Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry Final report of Royal Commissioner, the Hon. Terence Cole, March 2003 Volume 03-National perspective, part 1


Download PDF Download PDF

Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

National Perspective Part 1

Vol ume Three Royal Commissioner, The Honourable Terence Rhoderic Hudson Cole RFD QC

February 2003

Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry- Volume Titles

Volume 1 Summary of Findings and Recommendations

Volume 2 Conduct of the Commission - Principles and Procedures

Volume 3 National Perspective Part 1

Volume 4 National Perspective Part 2

Volume 5 Reform - Establishing Employment Conditions

Volume 6 Reform -Occupational Health and Safety

Volume 7 Reform - National Issues Part 1

Volume 8 Reform - National Issues Part 2

Volume 9 Reform - National Issues Part 3

Volume 1 0 Reform - Funds

Volu me 11 Reform - Achieving Cu ltural Change

Volume 12 State and Territory Overviews

Volume 13 Hearings - New South Wales Part 1

Volu me 14 Hearings - New South Wales Part 2

Volume 15 Hearings -Victoria Part 1

Volu me 16 Hearings - Victoria Part 2

Volume 1 7 Hearings - Queensland Part 1

Volu me 18 Hearings - Queensland Part 2

Volume 19 Hearings -South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory

Volume 20 Hearings - Western Australia Part 1

Volume 21 Hearings- Western Australia Part 2

Volume 22 Administration

Volume 23 Confidential Volume

ISBN : 0 642 21096 9

© Commonwealth of Australia 2003

This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth available from Information Services. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Copyright Services, Information Services, GPO Box 1920, Canberra ACT 2601 or e-mail Cwealthcopyright@finance.gov.au

Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Contents

Abbreviations

2

3

A National Perspective

Preface

Findings

A question of attitude

Governments

The future

Notes to A National Perspective

Structure of the Industry

Introduction

Size and scope of the industry

Growth in building and construction

Firms in the industry

Structure of the industry

Th e building and construction process

Notes to Structure of the Industry

Profile of Participants

Providers of capital and clients

Superannuation funds

Other roles of governments

Industry associations

Head contractors

Subcontractors

Unions

Role of the Australian Council of Trade Unions and trades and labour councils

The workforce

3

3

4

14

35

4 1

43

49 49

53

57

59

62

67

72

75

75

79

88

92

102

103

110

121

122

National Perspective Part 1 iii

4

5

Regulatory Framework

Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth)

Other Acts

National Construction Code

Awards

Bargaining framework

Office of the Employment Advocate

Industrial tribunals

Federal Court of Austral ia

Notes to Regulatory Framework

Industry Culture and Practice

157

165

167

167

167

168

173

177

189

198

205

Industry culture 205

Problems in the industry 214

National issues 222

Scope to improve performance 224

Reasons for continuing problems in the building and construction industry 225

Notes to Industry Culture and Practice 233

Attachment 1 Financial Analysis of Principal Employer and Employee Associations 237

Introduction 239

2

3

Employee Associations

The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union

The Australian Workers Union

Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union

The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Employer Associations

Australian Industry Group

Civil Contractors Federation

The Master Bui lders Associations

National Electrical and Communications Association

Employer Plumbing and Allied Industry Associations

Attachment 2 ACA members

Attachment 3 Union Governance and Objects

Attachment 4 State Tribunals

Attachment 5 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) Extracts

iv Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

241

241

242

244

247

251

251

252

252

253

255

257

263

279

307

Attachment 6 Industrial disputes in the building and construction industry

Attachment 7 Failure of Existing Remedies

Notes to Attachments 1 - 7

317

323

355

National Perspective Part 1 V

Vi Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Abbreviations

Australian Bureau of Statistics

Australian Construction Industry Council

Austral ian Construction Industry Forum

Australian Constructors Association

Australian Council of Trade Unions

Australian Industry Group

Australian Workers' Union, The

Auto motive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred

Industries Union (referred to as the Australian Manufacturing Wqrkers Union)

Building Workers Industrial Union of Australia

Civil Contractors Federation

Commonwealth

Com munications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information,

Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Construction & Building Unions Superannuation Fund

Construction Industry Development Agency

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Department of Industry Science and Resources'

ABS

ACIC

ACIF

ACA

ACTU

AIG

AWU

AMWU

BWIU

CCF

C'wth

CEPU

Cbus

CIDA

CFM EU

ISR

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Economic Development Committee EDC

Federation of Industrial, Manufacturing and Engineering Employees FIM EE

FED FA Division FED FA

Housing Industry Association Limited HIA

Master Builders Australia Inc MBA Inc

National Building and Construction Committee NatBACC

National Perspective Part 1

National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry

New South Wales

Royal Commission into Pro ductivity in the Building

and Construction Industry

the Rules of the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering,

Printing and Kindred Industries Union '

Contractors

Baulderstone Hornibrook Pty Ltd

Grocon Pty Ltd

Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd

Westfield Design and Construction Pty Ltd

2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

the National Construction Code

NSW

the Gyles Royal Commission

AMWU Ru les

Bau lderstone

Grocon

Leightons

Westfield

1 A National Perspective

Preface

This volume describes the building and construction industry from a national perspective. It

outlines the culture and practices within the industry, how pressures have arisen which result in

unlawful and inappropriate practices and conduct and how the remedies currently available to

the industry have failed to address these problems. It describes national institutions,

organisations and regulation.

2 It draws together all the material , including material addressed in the vo lumes relating to the

States and Territories and hearings, the 18 Discussion Papers issued by the Commission, the

responses thereto, private consultations with industry participants and general submissions

1·eceived.

3 Thi s Royal Commission was created to inquire into and report on the building and construction

industry throughout Australia. It was not a Commission created to inquire into practices and

conduct in each State and Territory. In order to obtain a national perspective of the matters

identified in the Terms of Reference, however, it was necessary to obtain information and

material from each State and Territory. One way in which that was done was by holding

hearings in New South Wales , Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia,

Tasmania, and the Northern Territory. Matters arising in the ACT were dealt with during the New

South Wales hearings.

4 In each State and Territory, in addition to calling overview evidence, which was evidence at a

high level of generality about the state of the industry, Counsel Assisting called evidence of

particular incidents that they regarded as representative, or that were illustrative of particular

problems, together with evidence of the extent and effect of such practices. That evidence was

designed to explore the nature and extent of the various types of practice and conduct

described in my Letters Patent.

5 My findings in relation to the particular incidents examined in evidence, any unlawfulness

disclosed by those case studies, and my conclusions on what was to be drawn from them are

set out in the hearings volu mes (volumes 13-21).

6 I have explained in detail my approach to the Commission's investigation of particular incidents

and the making of findings in relation to them in volume 2 of this report, Conduct of the

Commission - Principles and Procedures .

National Perspective Part 1 3

7 The overview evidence, the material disclosed in the hearings volumes and other material

relevant to eac h state and terri tory is assembled in a vo lume entitled State and Territory

Overviews (volume 12). A picture of the building and construction industry in each State and

Territory is there described.

8 The problems exposed in this national perspective, and the recommended solutions to these

problems are addressed in the reform volu mes (vo lumes 5-1 1 ).

9 This volume does not address in detail issues relating to occupational health and safety (OH&S)

and industry funds. Those issues are addressed in volumes 6 and I 0.

Findings

I 0 In the building and construction industry throughout Australia, there is:

(a) widespread disregard of, or breach of, the enterprise bargaining provisions of the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth);

(b) widespread disregard of, or breach of, the freedom of association provisions of the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth);

(c) widespread departure from proper standards of occupational health and safety;

(d) widespread requi rement by head contractors for subcontractors to have union -endorsed

enterprise bargaining agreements (EBAs) before bein g permitted to commence work on

major projects in State capital central business districts and major regional centres;

(e) widespread requirement for employees of subcontractors to become members of unions

in associat ion with their employer obtaining a union-endorsed enterprise bargaining

ag reement;

(f) widespread requirement to employ union-nominated persons in critical positions on

building projects;

(g) widespread disregard of the terms of enterprise bargaining agreements once entered

into;

(h) widespread application of, and surrender to, inappropriate industrial pressure;

(i) widespread use of occupational health and safety as an industrial tool;

U) widespread making of, and receipt of, inappropriate payments;

(k) unlawful strikes and threats of unlawful strikes;

(I) threatening and intimidatory conduct;

(m) underpayment of employees' entitlements;

(n) disregard of contractual obligations;

(o) disregard of National and State codes of practice in the building and construction

industry;

4 Final Report of the Royal Commission in to the Building and Construction Industry

(p) disregard of, or breach of, the strike pay provisions of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth);

(q) disregard of, or breach of, the right of entry provisions of the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wthj;

(r) disregard of Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AI RC) and court orders;

(s) di sregard by senior un ion officials of unlawful or inappropriate acts by inferior union

officials ;

(t) reluctance of employers to use leg al remedies available to them;

(u) absence of adequate security of payment for subcontractors;

(v) avoidance and evasion of taxation obligations;

(w) inflexibility in workplace arrangements;

(x) endeavours by unions, particularly the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energ y Union

(CFMEU), to regulate the industry; and

(y) disregard of the rule of law.

11 These findings demonstrate an industry which departs from the standards of commercial and

industrial conduct exhibited in the rest of the Australian economy. They mark the industry as

singula r. They indicate an urgent need for structural an d cultural refo rm.

12 At the heart of the findings is lawl ess ness . It is exhibited in many ways. There is criminal

conduct. In volume 23, which I have recommended not be made public , I have recommended

that certain conduct be referred to the relevant auth orities for consideration whether criminal

charge s should be brought. My recommendations concern activities an d persons in New

South Wales , Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia. There are breaches of laws of

general application to all Australians where the sanction is a penalty rather than possible

imprisonment. My findings in respect of such conduct as was examined are sum marised at the

end of each State and Territory overview. There are breaches of many provisions of the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) . Those findings are also found at the end of each State

and Territory Overview. The unsatisfactory record in respect of occupational health and safety

ind icates breaches of the various State acts addressing that matter. There is disregard of or

breach of the revenue statutes, both Commonwealth and State. When Courts or Tribunals

become involved and make orders, some union participants, particularly the CFMEU , regard

such orders as not binding upon them. There is the commonly held view, translated into

practice, that agreements entered into are binding upon unions only insofar as they confer

upon th e union a benefit, but not insofar as th ey confer an obligation. Underlying al l of this

lawlessness is an understanding and expectation, which reflects the reality, that those

eng aging in unl awful conduct wi ll not be held to account by criminal proceedings, proceed ings

for penalties, or for loss occasioned to others by unlawful conduct.

13 Subsidiary to this widespread conduct, which is plainly unlawful, are categories of conduct

wh ich would be regarded by most Australians, and which I regard, as inappropriate. For legal

reasons explained in volume 2, I have not made find ings of inappropriate conduct against

National Perspective Part 1 5

individuals or organ isations, unless they conceded such inappropriate conduct. Shortly stated,

it might have been regarded as unfair now to make a finding of inappropriate conduct judged

against a previously undefined standard of reference. That does not mean, however, th at

widespread inappropriate conduct and practices do not exist within the industry. They do, and

are accepted as part of th e industry culture. The reasons why such conduct is in appropriate

are various . Some conduct plainly infringes the objects of the Workplace Relations Act 1 996 (C'wth) although not, in all circumstances, the specific provisions of the Act. Other conduct

interferes unnecessarily with the building and construction process. Further conduct reduces

productivity for no reasonable commensurate purpose. Other conduct impinges upon a

person's right of free choice. Other conduct departs from recognised norms of civility and

behaviour. Some conduct interferes with what most Australians would recognise as the ir

freedom to conduct their businesses and their lives without interference from third parties. All of

this conduct unsettles participants in the industry; it causes them concern and uncertainty, and

inhibits any relati onship of trust and confidence.

14 The types of inappropriate conduct which exist throughout the building and construction

industry include: 1

• industrial action, or threats thereof, on a site and other related or unrelated sites, if all

subcontractors did not have a union-endorsed enterprise bargaining agreement (EBA);2

• stoppage of work by a union because a subcontractor would not enter into a union­ endorsed EBA; 3

• harassment by union officials of a subcontractor because it wou ld not enter into a union­ endorsed EBA;4

• union officials restricting, or threatening to restrict, a subcontractor's opportunity to

obtain work if it did not sign a union-endorsed EBA;5

• unions taking industrial action on government sites to pressure a government to adopt a

policy that contractors have a union-endorsed EBA in order to do government work;6

• unions demanding that if all subcontractors cannot be required to have a union-endorsed

EBA, EBA term s and conditions are to be applied by all subcontractors irrespective of

other agreements;?

•

•

•

•

union officials pressuring head contractors to replace subcontractors on a site because

they did not have a union-endorsed EBA; 8

the threat by union officials to prevent subcontractors with Australian Workplace

Agreements (AWAs) from working on site; 9

disregard by union officials of the wishes of employees , or their failure to consult with employees; 10

the initiation of a bargaining period by a union, although uninvited to do so by employees,

and where no employees were union members; 11

• interference by unions in industrial and safety issues where no employee had made a

complaint and no employee was a union member; 12

6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• unions seeking to have subcontractors enter into a union-endorsed EBA, without

seeking the views of employees, or where that was contrary to the wishes of

employees; 13

• a union refusing to sign an agreement agreed by its members with their employer, despite

the unanimous wishes of the members that it do so; 14

• agreement between a head contractor and a union about the appointment of a job

delegate, without regard to the wishes of workers on site; 15

• the lack of flexibility in union pattern EBAs;

• the payment to workers, pu rsuant to a pattern EBA, of a productivity allowance, with no

corresponding increase in productivity; 16

• head contractors and unions making ag reements which overrule agreements made

between subcontractors and their employees; 17

• agreements between head contractors and unions restricting the way subcontractors

can conduct their business; 18

• unions in sisting on the payment of a travel al lowance to workers who did not travel in

their work; 19

• a union taking or threatening to take industrial action in its own interests; 20

• union members engaging in sympathy action in support of matters not related to the site

on which they are working;21

• a union taking industrial action against an employer because of the public expression of

an opinion with which it disagrees; 22

• unlawful industrial action by a union forcing businesses to move outside the state, or to

determine not to work in that state;23

• unions seeking to act as the arbiter of who can and cannot work in the industry or in an

industry sector;24

• union officials attempting to regulate an industry by seeking 'donations' from contractors

to fund the salary of a union organiser; 25

• a union circulating 'approved subcontractor lists ';26

• a union requ iring a contractor to submit to a wage book inspection before permitting a

contractor to start work;27

• a union requiring a contractor to submit to a wage book inspection by a third party

nominated by the union, but paid for by the contractor; 28

• a union issuing notices purporting to have a statutory basis and authority, which they do not; 29

• the calling of unauthorised meetings by union officials; 30

National Perspective Part 1 7

• union officials acting with the apparent belief that their righ t of entry was effectively

unlim ited; 31

• the refusal by union officials to leave site upon request by the head contractor or occupier; 32

• the making by unions of groundless, unspecified or disputed wage claims, and

supporting such claims with threats of black bans or other industrial action; 33

• the failure of union officials to refer asserted breaches of awards and other industrial

issues to the relevant authorities; 34

• the fai lure by a union to provide particularisation of wage claims, while maintaining

pressure in support of the all eged claim; 35

• threats by a union to conduct wage book inspections to achieve its industrial aims; 36

• payment by a head contractor of unpaid debts of its subcontractor, pursuant to an

im plicit or explicit un ion demand; 37

• a union pressuring a head contractor to withhold payments from a subcontractor, in turn

placing pressure on the subcontractor to accede to the union's industrial aims; 38

• the employment by a contmctor of a particular person at the behest of a union; 39

• the enforcement of union-endorsed EBAs or union membership by un ion delegates; 40

• a union asserting a right to dictate when work may take place on a site; 4 1

• a un ion asserting a right to require the engagement of unnecessary labour; 42

• a union asserting a right to determine who may work on a project; 43

• a union asserting a right to determine who will be employed as a crane operator; 44

• unions preventing access to site; 45

• unions preventing the removal of equipment from site; 46

• union officials using abusive language and intimidatory behaviour; 47

• demarcation disputes between un ions, occasioning loss and delay; 48

• inadequate accounting procedures within a union; 49

• a union handling money received in settlement of wage claims differently from the way it

represented th at the money would be handled; 50

• the fa il ure of unions to account to employers fo r moneys paid fol lowing book audits; 5 1

• a practice within the industry that the response to the unlawful or inappropriate exercise

of power by a union is the payment of money or a 'commercial solution' rather than resort

to the law; 52

• contractors paying money to a union (or to an organisation nominated by the un ion) in an endeavour to buy industrial peace;53

• a union imposing informal 'penalties' upon contractors; 54

8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• the disguising of payments of money by contractors to a union; 55

• a union using industrial power to raise money for its own purposes; 56

• unions accepting membership fees in respect of employees who did not wish to join a union; 57

• unions demanding that they be paid money equivalent to membership fees for particular

persons, even though they did not want those persons to join the union; 58

• head contractors bowing to, accepting and supporting demands made by a union of

subcontractors by the application of commercial pressure; 59

• contractors paying union su bsc riptions for employees in order to enable those

employees to work on a site; 60

• head contractors acceding to union pressure to withhold payments from a

subcontractor, in turn placing pressure on the subcontractor to accede to the union's

industrial aims; 61

• a head contractor engaging a uni on-nominated delegate, who is al lowed to exercise an

inappropriate level of control over the site, such as determining which subcontractors

may commence on site, performing site inductions or having responsibility for safety and compliance issues; 62

• head contractors ceding control to unions over the erecti on of cranes; 63

• a head contractor stopping a subcontractor from working as a resul t of a complaint by a

union official , wi thout the head contractor undertaking any investigation of the matter; 64

• a head contractor co-operating with a union to render ineffective the work of an industry

task force; 65

• the unwi llingness of contractors to take legal action against unions to protect thei r

property or rights, or to recover loss; 66

• a head contractor and a su bcontractor agreeing to di sgu ise from a client payments to the

subcontractor, wh ich payments were required by a union; 67

• unions or head contractors applying pressure upon subcontractors in support of union

membership on sites; 68

• union 'show card' days; 69

• unions asserting the rig ht not to work with non-union labour;70

• compulsion upon non-members to attend meeting s called by un ion officials; 71

• the use by a union of OH&S issues as an industrial tool, interming led with legitimate

OH&S issues; 72

• the ra ising of alleged OH&S issues by a union in pursuit of industrial ends; 73

• unions making unqualified and incorrect assertions about OH&S processes; 74

National Perspective Part 1 9

• unions refusing to accept the results of repeated independent and expert safety inspections of a site; 75

• unions fai ling to refer asserted OH&S breaches to the relevant authorities; 76

• union officials preventing persons from working on site to rectify asserted safety hazards,

because of the existence of the safety hazards; 77

• employers failing to observe proper OH&S standards; 78

• disregard of the provisions of agreements entered into; 79

• disregard of dispute resolution procedures, both legislative and agreed; 80

• head contractors paying money to unions to entice them to adhere to dispute resolution procedures; 81

• a government department divulging confidential information to unions; 82

• a government department intervening in an industrial dispute in a way that lent support to activity by unions which was unlawful;s3

• a government department using a prequalification mechanism to pressure a contractor

to sign a union-endorsed agreement; 84

• a government being unwillingly to award a tender to a contractor, despite it being

satisfactory in all relevant respects, because of fears of possible disruption by a union; 85

• a WorkCover authority being susceptible to pressure from officials of a union; 86

• an industrial relations consultant to a state government being willing to arrange for

payments to be made to a contractor for services which were not provided; 87

• the covert commitment by a state government of public moneys to assist a private

company to overcome the effects of unlawful and inappropriate industrial action by

unions. 88

15 The question immediately arises why this unlawfulness and inappropriate conduct and

practices occurs, and why they have been allowed to continu e.

16 The answer is complex, but can be simply stated. The unlawful and inappropriate practices

occur because of a clash between the short term project profitability focus of the providers of

capital , clients, head contractors and subcontractors on the one hand, and the long term aspirations of the union movement, especially the CFMEU, to dominate, control and regulate

the industry for its benefit and what it perceives to be the benefit of its members, on the other hand.

17 This clash of short term focus with a longer term objective usually resul ts in those with the short

term focus surrendering to those with the longer term objective. The short term project driven profitability focus means that surrender to demands is the better immediate economic

alternative to long drawn out conflict. It means that quick fix solutions driven by commercial

expediency supplant insistence on legal rights, adherence to ethical and legal norms and the

pursuit of legal remedies. Those with longer term objectives know that those with a short term

focus are vulnerable to delay and cost. There is thus an inequality of bargaining power when

1 0 Final Report of the Royal Commission in to the Building and Construction Industry

conflict occurs. Sometimes unlawful or inappropriate conduct occurs for the sole reason of

exploiting or reinforcing that power.

18 The unions with coverage of workers in the building and construction industry have the

capacity to organise and engage in industrial conflict which can cause debilitating disruption to

major projects with little risk of being held to account. They have long term objectives but often

take a short term view towards the interests of their members and the resolution of disputes.

Short term outcomes for members, such as increased entitlements or benefits, tend to prevail

over long term outcomes, such as increased employment in the industry or more flexible work

practices. Underlying much of the conduct of unions, and in particular the CFMEU, is a

disregard or contempt for the law and its institutions, particularly where the policy of the law is

to foster individualism, freedom of choice or genuine enterprise bargaining. Overwhelmingly,

industrial objectives are pursued through industrial conduct, rather than reliance on

negotiations or the law and legal institutions.

19 The unwillingness and incapacity of head contractors to respond to unlawful industrial conduct

causing them loss is due, principally, to two structural factors. The first relates to their desire to

be long term participants in the industry. To be so, having regard to the competitive nature of

the industry and the low profit outcomes, requires them to not only address the short term

focus on profitability of a given project, but to consider the long term relationship with union

participants. They know that unless there is significant acceptance of union demands, there will

be continuous industrial disruption on other current and future projects. Clients, including

governments, who are major participants in the industry, will not select contractors who are

unable to deliver projects on time and within budget. prospect of industrial disruption is a

disqualifying feature for the obtaining of future work, and thus being a long time participant in

the industry. This is well understood both by the contractors, and by the unions. It places

enormous power in the hands of unions. It encourages unions to use that power to obtain

otherwise unattainable outcomes. The threat of the use of power is as effective as its exercise.

Each of the unions and the contractors knows this and factors this circumstance into their

relationships.

20 The second structural factor is the weakness in the mechanisms for enforcing laws of general

application, including criminal law, the industrial law, especially the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth), and the civil law for recovery of loss caused by unlawful action. There is no body

to ensure that the industry operates with in the law. The Task Forces established in New South

Wales on the recommendation of the Gyles Royal Commission in 1991 , and in Western

Australia in 1994 were soon abolished at the behest of the unions. The Office of the

Employment Advocate (OEA) established by the Commonwealth Government in 1996 is

responsible for all industries, not just the building and construction in dustry, is under-resourced

to address thi s industry, and has no special building and construction industry focus . There is

no organisation either to monitor the industry, or to ensure that normal standards attaching to

criminal, industrial and civil behaviour are adhered to.

21 Regarding the criminal law, there is an attitude within police forces that whenever conduct

which might offend against the criminal law occurs on or in relation to a construction site, the

matter is one of an industrial nature. On construction sites, the police attitude is that it is their

function to maintain the peace, not enforce the criminal law.

National Perspective Part 1 11

22 The efforts , inadequate and ineffective though they were, by the Office of the Employment

Advocate, to enforce the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) on building and construction

sites, were defeated by the unions by a consistent policy of obstruction and threat of industrial

action if contractors co-operated with the Office of the Employment Advocate. The CFMEU in

New South Wales issued pamphlets advising workers that if representatives of the Office of

Employment Advocate entered a site, they should say nothing and immediately contact the union. The men were directed to sit in the sheds whenever an inspector was on site. The threat

of future union action if there was co-operati on by contractors with the OEA in spectors was effective in en suring there was no such co-operation.

23 Resort to the AIRC by employers for relief against unlawful action was equally ineffective.

Consistent with its charter, the Australian Industrial Rel ations Commission (A IRC) sought to

resolve disputes by negotiation. If that failed, orders coul d be made, but not enforced,

notwithstanding that such orders were, by statute, mandatory. Both contractors and unions

know this. The unions adopted the view that, notwithstanding statutory provisions making

orders of the AIRC mandatory, they would decide, at their whim, whether they would adhere to

those orders. The process of enforcement involved taking yet further proceedings in the

Federal Court. Orders of the Federal Court were equally regarded by the unions as not

mandatory, to the despair of some Fed eral Court judges. Justice Merke l said, in relation to the

non-compliance by a senior union official with a court imposed penalty order:

The failure by all persons interested to seek to enforce the penalty order punishing [the

official] for his wilful contempt of court had the potential to bring the administration of

justice into disrepute. That IS especially so in view of [the official's] continuing wilful and

public defiance of the order. 89

24 From the contractor's viewpoint, faced with the prospect of little effective support from legal

structures, and ongoing loss, the pragmatic commercial decision was almost invariably taken

to resolve the dispute by surrendering to the union demands to the least extent possible. The

loss suffered by contractors is immediate, being the cost of standing charges while work

ceased, and prospective, being the cost of liquidated damages if projects were not completed

on time. Liquidated damages on a major project can equate to at least $250 000 per day.

Overhanging, remains the prospect of future retaliation by the union. The incentive to surrender is great.

25 If unlawful industrial action occurs causing loss to a contractor, the existing law, although

expansive and complex, provides theoretical relief. In reality there is no relief. To recover losses,

a separate action is necessary either in the Federal Court or a court of competent jurisdiction.

That litigation will be expensive, will not conclude for at least twelve months and more likely for

two years, may be subject to appeals, and the outcome may be uncertain. Th e litigation would involve a focus on a particular project. By the time litigation is ready for hearing, that project

may be conclud ed . Th e business focus of the contractor is on its next job. The inducements to

resolve any such litigation and move on are great. Contractors and unions both appreciate this.

26 In any such litigation to recover loss from unlawful industrial action, the unions invariably raise

technical objections relating to their absence of responsibility. Unions are quick to seize, exploit,

and publicise the benefits and advantages of collectivism. They are equally quick to deny

1 2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

responsibility for collective action when it causes others loss. For example, in consequence of

a dispute involving the Lavarack Barracks in Queensland, and the Kwinana Freeway in Western

Australia, the CFMEU decided to take industrial action against Th iess. The decision to take that

action was made during a telephone conference arranged by Mr John Sutton, the National

Secretary of the CFMEU, Construction and General Division. The participants in the telephone

conference were Mr Alex Bukarica, then the Assistant National Secretary of that Division, and

the Secretaries of the Divisional Branches of the Construction and General Division in each

State and Territory, including Mr Andrew Ferguson (New South Wales), Mr Martin Kingham

(Victoria), Mr Kevin Reynolds (Western Australia) and Mr William Trohear (Queensland). The

industrial action cost Thiess over $300 000. The CFMEU submitted to me that it was not

responsible for the nationwide industrial action . The basis for this was that: 'The telephone

hook-up was only between State Secretaries of the CFMEU and Bukarica . It was not a meeting

of the CFMEU.' It submitted that, 'The CFMEU did not co-ordinate any industrial action. The

CFMEU did not co-ordinate anything.' These submissions were apparently based on the

assertion that the CFMEU could not be responsible for the nationwide industrial action unless it

was implemented as a result of a decision of the National Executive of the CFMEU.

27 Whatever the legal merits of this su bmission on the current state of the law, such a position is

obviously absurd. Yet that is the type of barrier placed before those wishing to sue a union for

unlawful industrial action causing loss.

28 The result is that, even if litigation to recover loss from unlawful industrial action is commenced,

it is regarded , as Mr Kingham has said, only as a 'bargaining chip '. The unions and the

contractor know that whilstever unions control major construction sites, a matter I will address,

there must be rapprochement between the union and the contractor. They know that the

contractor cannot afford ongoing industrial disputes because of immediate losses, prospective

losses from liquidated damages, and prospective injury to reputation affecting future work.

Frequent short stoppages have an equal effect. The union is under no constraints of loss or

damage to reputation. While it controls major sites, it controls a significant element of the

labour force with the capacity to cause disruption and loss. The bargaining chip of litigation and

recovery of loss already caused is bargained away in that rapprochement. That is the recent

Grocon experience.

29 In the result, there is one category of participants, the contractors and subcontractors, who

have the potential to suffer serious present and future loss from unlawful industrial conduct by

unions. They know, in reality, that loss is irrecoverable. Opposed to them are unions, especially

the CFMEU, who know that engaging in unlawful industrial action causing loss to contractors

and subcontractors will not attract criminal sanctions, wi ll not attract penalties, cannot be

stopped by the AIRC, w ill rarely be the subject of Federal Court proceedings and, if they are

sued for loss , that litigation will be resolved without cost to them as part of future industrial

negotiations.

30 Governments have stood by and allowed this situation to eventuate. It is no wonder that the

CFMEU , and other unions, applied such pressure to governments for the removal of the Task

Forces in New South Wales and Western Australia, and mounted such an intense campaign

against the OEA when it sought to intervene. Th ey were the only three bodies with any

prospect of controlling unlawful industrial action.

National Perspective Part 1 1 3

31 The attitude of the unions, particularly the CFMEU , to the obl igation of their officials to adhere

to the law is exemplified by banners and placards carried in demonstrations against the Royal

Commi ssion, and most recently, in demonstrations in Melbourne relating to the charging of

Kingham by the Director of Public Prosecutions, not the Royal Commission, alleging breaches

of the Royal Commissions Act 1902 (C'wth). The banners reading 'Touch One- Touch All ' are

carried in mass meetings of protest. Th ey encapsulate a view that, even if it be that conduct by

a union official is agai nst the law of Australia, that law either has no application to or should not

be enforced against a union official. Implicit in the disruptive demonstrations is that if the law,

applicable to all other Australians , is applied against uni onists, disruption to construction sites

and normal civic life will occur. The demonstrations place implicit pressure on the judicial

system to take account of consequences that might flow if, in accordance with proper

principles of law, a union official were convicted of an offence. No other Australian citizen ,

charged with an offence, is entitled to disrupt commercial and civic life. No other Australian

citizen is entitled to maintain a position th at application of the law of this country against him or

her will result in commercial and civi l unrest. The attitude implicit in the statement 'Touch One­

Touch All ' in this context is that unions, and especially their officials, are immune from the

normal law applicable to all Australians. Collective action, having as its purpose the defeat of

the operation of the law, cannot be permitted to prevail over the will of the Australian people,

expres sed through th e Parliam ent and applied through the courts. I acknowledge the rights ,

advantages and merits of collectivism, but where they conflict wi th the ru le of law, the rule of

law mu st prevail . Otherwise, there is anarchy.

A question of attitude

32 The extent of unlawful and in appropriate conduct differs amongst the States, and differs

between unions. By far the worst is the co ndu ct and practices of the CFMEU and its officials.

In contrast, the Australian Workers' Union (AWU) has a general approach of adhering to

agreements made, and generally respecting the rights of others. Between these two are the

Communications , Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Al li ed

Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Au tomotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing

and Kindred Industries Union (AMWU).

33 There is also a difference in the lm1el of unlawfulness between the building and civil construction sectors of the industry. By far the worst is the building industry sector where the CFMEU predomi nates. The structure of the civil construction segment of the in dustry is somewhat

different to that of the building industry. In the construction sector the major contractors and

subcontractors have many more permanent employees, are frequently engaged on major

works in more remote areas, and operate in a construction enviro nm ent where there is not

such a close interaction between various trades.

34 It is important to understand the attitude of the participants in the industry. Thi s attitude has

evo lved from the operati on of the factors, pressures and outcomes which I have just discussed.

1 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

The attitude of the CFMEU

35 The CFMEU has an attitude of dominance. It is fully aware of its capacity through unlawful

industrial action to cause harm for which it will not be held responsible. It knows that it has a

network of militant unionists throughout Australia who will adopt the direction, intimation or

suggestion of union officials. It knows it can bring pressure to bear on major contractors

operating throughout Australia by threatening action on projects unrelated to any dispute on a

particular project. It knows it can ignore agreed dispute resolution mechanisms, favouring

instead industrial action to achieve its objectives. It knows, ultimately, that that pressure will be

so intense that even the most major contractors will ultimately surrender to the pressure. As

Kingham said in relation to the Sun Metals dispute: 'Inevitably the company is going to have to

back down very shortly and negotiate a settlement to this dispute'.90

36 Thi s attitude permeates throughout the union structure, being exhibited at all levels .

37 At the top of this structure in the CFM EU is Mr John Sutton, National Secretary of the

Construction and General Division of the CFM EU. Mr Sutton was, with Mr Ferguson , a

signatory to the Deed of Adherence dated 16 March 199491 between the State of New South

Wales, and the CFMEU Building Unions Division , New South Wales Divisional Branch, and the

Building Workers Industrial Union of Australia (BWIU), New South Wales Branch. By that Deed

those unions avoided deregistration. Th e unions undertook:

• to continue to comply with the dispute settlement procedures contained in the awards

and agreements to which unions were a party (Clause 3. 7);

• not to resort to industrial action in support of paym·ent for lost time in relation to a period

during which members were engaged in industrial action (Clause 3.8);

• not to pursue or seek to enforce any mechanism implying that compulsory unionism

applied on any construction site in New South Wales, contrary to established legal rights

(Clause 3.9);

• to be opposed to and not engage in or support victimisation , threats and intimidation

against any person or persons in respect of whether a worker was or was not a union

member (C lause 3.1 0); and

• to abide by the right of entry provisions contained in State and Federal industrial

legislation , awards and agreements to which the unions were respondent (Clause 3.1 3).

38 The unions also agreed to abide by their own Code of Conduct. 92 That imposed upon union

officers the following obligations:

• No person was to use their position for individual advantage or gain (Clause 4).

• No officer engaged by the unions was to converse in an abusive or derogatory manner

towards any person with whom they came into contact, irrespective of provocation

(Clause 5).

• All agreements entered into by unions were to be adhered to and honoured (Clause 8).

• No arbitrary fines or money penalties were to be imposed upon any builder or

subcontractor under any circumstance (Clause 13).

National Perspective Part 1 I 5

• All officers were to respect and abide by the relevant dispute settlement procedure

(Clause 16).

• All officials were to conduct themselves in accordance with their legal obligations arising

from their right of entry permits (Clause 17) .

39 The obligati ons set out above do no more than state the then and presently ex isting law and proper standards of behaviour. Although th e Deed applied and sti ll applies only in New South

Wales, adherence to the law and proper standards of behaviour would result in the CFMEU and

its officials acting in accordance with those obligations throughout Australia. Each of the

obligations is regularly breached and has been for many years . A reading of the case studies

throughout Australia makes that plain. There was no evidence before me to suggest that

Mr Sutton has taken any steps, and certainly not any effective steps, to ensure that the

undertakings he and Mr Ferguson, the other sig natory, gave were adhered to. The evidence

makes it plain that there is no point in making an agreement with the CFMEU because it will

adhere to that agreement only so long as it is in its interests to do so. Yet notwithstanding plain

and repeated breaches of the Deed of Adherence, nothing has been done by Government in

New South Wales since abolishing the New South Wales Task Force in 1995, to require

adherence to the terms of the Deed .

40 A similar contumelious disregard for the law was exhibited in 1997. On 22 May 1997 a meeting

of delegates of the CFMEU was held on the Stadium Australia site. The then Government of

Western Australia had recently introduced new industrial relations legislation . The contractor's

industrial relations report of that meeting stated:

Flyers were issued (refer attached) and John Sutton requested a letter to be written by all

national builders that they would not implement the new I.R. - laws on Western Australian

projects. 93

41 Four days later, the CFMEU organiser on the Stadium Australia project, Mr Barrios, was

informed by Mr Sutton that Multiplex had seven days to write a letter addressed to the CFMEU

stating that Multiplex would not follow the new industrial relations legislation on its Western

Australian projects94

42 Th is incident exhibits an attitude that it is for the union and its offi cials to decide whether it will

follow the law of a sovereign State, and further, that the union and its officials regarded it as

appropri ate to seek to pressure contractors to disregard the law.

New South Wales

43 The same attitude of dominance and disregard of the law permeates the State Branches of the

CFMEU. In New South Wales, a company, Deemah Marble and Granite, went into liquidation

leaving its employees owed wages. Ferguson, the State Secretary, claimed that Multiplex New

South Wales, as head contractor of the Establishment Hotel Project, was liable to pay certain

moneys in respect of those wages, as were Baulderstone, Leightons, Westfield and Grocon.

Multiplex paid to the CFMEU the amounts in excess of $70 000 said to be owing on its own

behalf and on behalf of Baulderstone, Leightons and Grocon. It did so 'under duress'. The

duress was that Ferguson told Stagg, a Multiplex director, that unless the moneys claimed from

the other companies were paid 'immediately then the Establi shment Hotel site would suffer

l 6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

immediate industrial acti on' . Thus Ferguson threatened industrial action to force payment of moneys not owing by Multiplex.95

44 In the Hackett Laboratory Services Pty Ltd (Hacketts) case study, that company did not have a

union-endorsed enterprise bargaining ag reement. In May 2000 Ferguson attended a meeting

with representatives of Hacketts and said he wanted Hacketts to take up a CFMEU endorsed

enterprise bargaining agreement. He said 'I want a deal and I want it today', that he had friends

in the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) , and cou ld have the company 'go down the tube' and

have Mr Hackett, a director of the company, put in gaol on tax matters 96

45 The attitude of disregard for the law is someti mes explic it. A company, Griffiths Landscape

Management Pty Ltd (Griffiths Landscape Management), failed, owing money to two

subcontractors. In March 2002 Ferguson contacted Zadro Constructions Pty Ltd (Zadro

Constructions) and asked it to pay money it owed to Griffiths Land scape Management directly

to the two subcontractors. Th e moneys should have been paid to the admini strator of Griffiths

Landscape Management. When the administrator raised with Ferguson the issue of Zadro

Constructions' legal oblig ations to him as administrator to pay the moneys to him, Ferguson responded, 'The union doesn 't believe in that law' 97

46 The dominant position the CFMEU asserts is illustrated in New South Wales by Ferguson's

attempt to regulate sectors of the industry. Ms Hi ll, the proprietor of Christies People Pty Ltd

(Ch risties People), a labour hire fi rm, knew that it was necessary to obtain a union-endot·sed

EBA with the CFMEU if she was to be able to provide labour to contractors on major projects

in th e CBD. She met with Ferguson to seek such an agreement. Ferguson told Hil l th at the

CFM EU would not be making a 'building EBA with Christies People'. He said that he was

endeavouring to regulate the industry and that there was no way that Christies People would

be a player in the building industry. He tol d Ms Hill that Christies People only had a 'civil' EBA

and that she was to get off all building sites immediatel y. When Hill protested that about 50 per

cent of Christies People's workforce was employed in the bu ilding industry, and asked whether

Christies People were supposed to put these employees off work, Ferguson said, 'yes'. He told

Murphy, an organise r, that if such workers were put off by Christies People, he would try and

help them get jobs with other builders and companies.98

47 Ferguson has attempted to regulate the cleaning industry. Focu s Property Services Pty Ltd had

a contract on a Baulderstone Pty Ltd project worth about $94 000. Ferguson al leged that

Focus Property was paying its employees cash in hand and keeping three sets of books. There

was no credible evidence presented to the Commission to support Fergu so n's allegations .

Ferguson told Clarke, Managing Di rector of Focus Property Services Pty Ltd, that it should not

work on the project. Clarke told Ferguson that Focus Property had a contract worth $94 000

and Ferguson replied, 'Bad luck' 99

48 This attitu de of dominance and disrespect for the rights of others to conduct business has

permeated down to the organiser level in New South Wales . On 11 Feb ruary 2002 Holland,

Construction Manager for Manu Enterprises Pty Limited, met Mitchell, a CFMEU organi ser.

Mitchell told Holland he wanted Bal l, a blocklaying contractor, 'off the site and out of business'.

When Holland demurred, Mitchell told Holland that Manu had to get rid of Ball or the union

would see that Man u 'went down too' . Later there was a meeting between Holland and union

National Perspective Part 1 1 7

officials including Parker, the Branch Assistant Secretary. Parker told the meeting that Ingleside

Bricklaying (Ball) was a 'pack of shonks' and that unless Manu got rid of Ingleside there wou ld

be 'lots of trouble'. Parker said that the CFMEU would stop the site and make life difficult for

Manu, that Manu would not get any work from clients, and that the CFMEU would spread the

word around and put black marks against Manu. 100

49 I heard evidence of a head contractor engaging an individual as a construction worker who in

the space of a few days took it upon himself to act as though he were a site delegate, did little

or no actual construction work, removed cases of beer from the site office, went to a political

rally, and fa il ed to report for work as requ ired. In short, the worker repeatedly showed contempt

for his employer and a disinclination to do any of the work for which he had been employed.

When the worker was retrenched, the CFMEU alleged that he was being victimised because of

his union activities and orchestrated a two day strike in support of his reinstatement. The

worker was re-employed for a few days, before he was permitted to resign so that he could

take up employment as an organiser with the CFMEU . The head contractor paid $20 000 to

the CFMEU for it to take the worker off the company's hands. The deal was structured to

enable the union to announce a win to its members and to sound a warning to other

contractors.101

50 A diary note taken by a site manager for Grindley Construction Pty Ltd records the actions of a

CFMEU organ iser, Brcic, who entered a Grindley site while a dispute about payment of a site

al lowance was current, and met with the workers:

Victo ria

[Brcic] even said that if the demands were not met, he would carry out a safety inspection

& would find faults that would close the site, if the demands were met he would go away

& not cause trouble on the site again. This was not accepted by Alan & that further

negotiation would be required & to meet again Monday [Brcic] wasn't happy with this &

he left the office & addressed the men again. He told them that management would not agree to the terms & he told the men that the job was stopped & to go home & come

back Monday I managed to speak to approx half the men & advised them that th e job

was not shut. I told them that above Level 4 would be out of bounds until the dispute was

settled & that the proper procedure to follow was in the E.B.A endorsed by unions &

agreed by them. While I was trying to talk to the men [Brcic] was interrupting telling them

not to listen to me. When I was asking [Brcic] on what grounds he was clos1ng the job &

he said it was on safety issues - this was based on not even carrying out an

Inspection. 102

51 The National Gallery of Victoria (NGV) case study illustrates graphically the problems with in the

building and construction industry in Victoria. The three phases of that study illustrate the

central role and immense power wielded by the building unions. That power was wielded not at

the behest of employees or members of the unions involved, but at the behest of officials , and predomin antly for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing union power.

52 The issues involved included the awarding of contracts fo r demolition works by the Victorian

Government to Able Demolitions and Excavations Pty Ltd (Able), it being known that there were

disputes between Able and the CFMEU . It was also known that there were demarcati on

I 8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

disputes between the CFMEU and the AWU regard ing coverage for work. Subject to those

matters, Able Demoliti ons was plainly the most su itable contractor. Th e State prevaricated in

awarding the contracts because of possible industrial action. That action occurred wi th a

disgraceful invasion of, and rampage through, the NGV on 1 0 August 2000 organised by

officials of the CFMEU . It was a physical demonstration of union power. A mob of unionists

caused damage of between $100 000 and $150 000. It was led by union officials, including

Kingham, Oliver, Cummins and McPartland , all senior CFMEU officials.

53 There was no respect by th e union for the law, for public property, for the rights of contractors

and their employees to work, or for safety. It was a raw exercise of union power aimed at

demonstrating to the Victorian Government its displeasure at a contract being awarded to

Able. It was aimed at showing the union's dominant position and demonstratin g that if

Government incurred its displeasure, consequences would follow, as they did.

54 Yet nobody did anything about this. The police investigation concluded with a statement that

wh ile, 'Serious offences of criminal damage were committed ... investigation has not disclosed

sufficient admissible evidence with which to charge any person with a criminal offence given

the burden of proof attached to such proceedings '.

55 The response of the State Government to submissions in this matter makes plain that the

principal reason why proceedings were not taken to recover the losses suffered from the

CFMEU and its officials was union power. Victoria submitted:

ff the question of recovery of foss after 10 August 2000 was considered, it would first

have been necessary to ascertain the extent of the damage sustained by the State and

quantify its loss (as distinct from the foss suffered by Able). The next question would have

been whether any person or organisation could be proved responsible for the foss. That

would no doubt have involved disputed matters of fact, as the Victoria Police

investigation confirmed. It would then have been necessary to obtain legal advice as to

the prospect of recovering the foss, and weigh that prospect against the legal costs

involved. Next, at a policy level, other issues would require consideration, including the

advantages of governmental condemnation of the actions of 10 August 2000 and the

public perception that such behaviour would lead to punitive action, but also the

consideration that a dispute threatening delivery of several major projects might become

intractable, with consequent damage to the State and its economy There was no single

correct way of resolving these issues .

56 As I concluded in that case study:

f do not doubt tha t 'the consideration that a dispute threatening delivery of several major

projects might become intractable, with consequent damage to the State and its economy'

weighed heavily in any deliberations regarding whether those who caused the damage

should be required to pay for it. Officials of the CFMEU had demonstrated in August 2000,

their capacity to shut down State projects. The State Library, Federation Square, the Myer

Music Bowl and the State Hockey and Netbafl Centre were afl the subject of stoppages and

bans between 11 and 14 August 2000. And because of the power, capacity and

wiflingness of CFMEU officials to cause further and greater damage, apparently recognised

by the State, lawlessness went unpunished and w1Jfuf damage unpaid for.

National Perspective Part 1 l 9

57 I have no doubt that if those who organised and engaged in that rampage , and caused that

loss were other than the CFMEU and its offi cials, appropriate action would have been taken.

This graphically illustrates the power of the threat of future industrial action. If it can stop the

State of Victoria, with all its power and resources, from taking appropriate action, the prospect

of individual head contractors, let alone small subcontractors, resisting such pressure is

remote. Th is illustrates the core problem with in the bu ilding and construction industry

throug hout Australia, and especially in Victoria, namely, lawlessness and damage caused by

unlawful action attracts no sanctions whatsoever, and the unions, especially the CFMEU as the most powerful within the industry, know it.

58 A further demonstration of the attitude of the CFMEU to the rights of others was demonstrated

in th e Grocon Li mited case stu dy. Th ere the CFMEU organi sed industrial action on six different

sites, shutting down those sites on 30 and 31 July 2002. The action was not protected action

and was plai nly unlawful. The reason for the action was because the union did not agree that

Grocon had an entitlement to make a submission to this Royal Commission . Nor did it agree

with the content of that submission . Union officials misrepresented the content of the

submission to meeti ngs and persuaded workers to take strike action . The loss to Grocon

exceeded $500 000. Any proceedings taken to recover that loss have apparently been

bargained away as part of the EBA negotiations. The industry has reached a sorry plight when

unlawful industrial action can be taken with impunity causing loss in excess of half a million

dollars becau se the CFMEU does not ag ree with the entitlement of a contractor to express its

views to a lawfully constituted Commission established under the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia.

59 It is not on ly governments and major con tractors that are subjected to pressure from the

CFMEU and its officials . In May 2002, Canham Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd (Canham)

com menced a small office refurbishment at 370 Little Bourke Street, Melbourne. The contract

value was $7000. On 30 May 2002 , Dawson , who identified himself as a un ion official , told a

subcontractor he had to have an EBA. Dawson spoke to Canham , said he had 'seen the guys

on the site', and that they must have an EBA. He said:

If you want to work in the city, it's our playground and if you want to play in our

playground then you have to join the union.

60 A few days later Setka, a CFMEU organiser, rang Canham and asked if he had spoken to

Dawson. Setka said that if Canham 's employees wanted to work in the city 'they had to join the

union, and it did not matter how small the job was'. 103

61 Thus is the freedom of small Australian con tractors to work restricted by the CFMEU.

Queensland

62 I have previously referred to Mr Sutton 's involvement in arranging concerted action against

Thiess arou nd Australia. A not diss imilar circumstance involved Multiplex Constructions Pty

Limited. A note prepared by Mr Allen, the Managing Director of Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd , records that in September 1999, Mr Sutton made the following demand of Mr Allen , in relation to the Maryborough Project, Queensland:

20 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Multiplex must agree to ensure that all subcontractors (employed at the above project),

have union certified EBAs or industrial action will occur at Multiplex projects, nationally

You required our response by 3.30 pm (EST) 15 September 1999. 104

63 There had been a meeting seeking resolution of a dispute on 14 September 1 999 to no avail.

Mr All en noted the following facts in his letter of 15 September 1999 to Mr Sutton:

1. Maryborough is a town of approximately 16,000 people some three hours north of

Brisbane.

2. The Multiplex Project is a $1 7 million regional shopping centre, using

predominantly local tradesmen and subcontractors.

3. Also being built in Maryborough are a $10 million building and a $4 million building

being built by local contractors. These projects have no EBAs, no union delegates, and no union pressure.

4. We understand that the employees on our project have not taken industrial action

over your claim.

5. Multiplex operates under a number of principles:

We value a working relationship with your union;

We have a preference for subcontractors with EBAs as it indicates a

willingness to ensure progressive industrial relations;

We have a preference for using local subcontractors as it enables the region

to benefit from the project;

We have to operate within the law.

You appear to have singled out Multiplex and advise that you may take industrial

action on other completely unrelated Multiplex projects in support of this claim.

64 This letter reflects the attitude of dominance to which I have referred. It reflects that union

officials, here the National Secretary, threatened action nationally in relation to a localised

dispute because of the CFMEU's insistence that all subcontractors have 'union certified EBAs'.

The action threatened was unrelated to any action by the actual workers on the project. The

threatened action interfered with the freedom of Multiplex and its subcontractors to negotiate

the terms upon which they wished to work, and interfered with the freedom of the

subcontractors to agree terms of employment with their employees.

65 When the note setting out Sutton's demand was put to him, the following exchange occurred:

Q: You see, that verbal advice that is ascribed to you in the first sentence of Mr Allen's

letter to you is consistent with the approach that you have employed in the last

three years or so, isn't it, in dealing with the majors?

A: I repeat that we put to all the major builders and builders all up and down the

country that we want them to have union-certified EBAs on their sites. That is not

something that would shock them or would find any horror on their part. It is in fact

something I think every trade union in the country does.

National Perspective Part 1 2 1

Q: Does every trade union in the country go on to say 'And if you don't agree,

industrial action will occur on other sites around Australia'?

A: Every trade union in the country, and historically, needs to back any demand with

some bargaining power. If it is just a wish, Mr Commissioner, or just a hope or just a plaintive cry, nothing will happen'. 105

66 Thus, industrial relat ions in the in dustry are based upon the notion of engendering surrender by

the capacity to cause severe economic loss.

67 In Queensland, Mr Simcoe is the State Secretary of the Australian Building Construction

Employees and Builders' Labourers ' Federation (Queensland Branch) Union of Employees

(B LF Q). He attended a meeting on 21 April 1998 with Mr Frame, from Thiess, and Mr Scott,

from Kozwin Constructions Pty Ltd, a subcontractor. Kozwin Constructions had let a contract

to Quality Concrete for concreting work. Simcoe wanted all of the workers from Quality

Concrete to 'be in the union'. He indicated that 'there might be industrial trouble on the site'.

When asked what he meant by that statement, Simcoe replied, 'If you give us a cheque for

$2000, the problem wi ll go away'. He was asked whether he was speaking of membership

fees. He replied, 'I don't want anyone from Qual ity Concrete in the union. They're just scum. If

you give us the cheque, the problem will go away.'

68 Later, he made threats regarding other Thiess operations, particularly the Southbank Project.

He indicated he wou ld visit the site the next day to ask workers if they wished to work with non­

union labour. He threatened to withdraw members from the site. Simcoe said that the rules of

the BLF Q 'state that we reserve our right to not work with non-union labour'. 106 If the rules do

so provide, they are indicative of an attitude that union members reserve the right to cause

disruption on projects because persons who have chosen not to join a union are working there.

69 Such an attitude is contrary to the freedom of association provisions in the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C'wth), and many State industrial Acts. It fails to recognise individuals' rights. It may well be that a unionist who does not wish to work with others who are not unionists may resign;

but there is no right to cause industrial disruption because somebody has a view different from

that of a unionist on the advantages of unionism.

70 The dominance of the CFM EU was also illustrated in the Homezone Home and Garden Centre

case study. There, a subcontractor wished to start subcontract works. Mr Smith, the CFMEU

job delegate, had been placed in a position to vet entry to the site. To gain entry it was

necessary to fill out a form in respect of each worker. The subcontractor had filled in

approximately 20 forms. Smith said, after sorting the forms, 'At least someone's in the union.

Only two in the union out of 20. Only two can start, the rest will have to sort yourselves out'.

The subcontractor was not permitted to start on the site until a 'better balance' between union and non-union membership was achieved.

71 In Queensland the CFMEU also seeks to regulate sectors of the industry. A labour hire

contractor, Wilson, arranged a meeting with Simcoe to try and get an EBA from the BLF 0.

Such an EBA was necessary to be able to persuade clients to use his services. Wi lson told Simcoe he had heard of the existence of a list kept by the union of labour hire companies.

Simcoe replied, 'You'd better believe there's a fucking list. You're not on it, and you're not getting on it unless you sign an EBA'. 1 O?

22 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

72 In similar vein , Jamie McHugh, a BLF Q organiser, told Peterson , a site manager employed by

Jezer Construction Group Pty Ltd that he was not permitted to have two labour companies on

site because they did not have an EBA with the BLF Q. Peterson responded that he did not

believe it was necessary to have an EBA because he was 'not running a complete union site'

and was 'employing both union and non -union people'. McHugh's response was that he was

'wrong, that they did have to have one and that if [Peterson] continued to use them [he] could

run into problems on site with deliveries, fences, scaffolding and this sort of thing' . McHugh

said he would talk to contractors with which Peterson was dealing, particularly concrete

contractors and tell them that the site 'would be blackballed' .108

Western A us tralia

73 In Western Australia, there is a similar attitude of dominance, power, disregard of the rights of

others, and disregard of the law. The CFMEU was in dispute w ith Bregma Pty Ltd (Bregma), a

subcontractor to Consoli dated Constructions Pty Ltd (Consolidated Constructions) . Th e

CFMEU had an EBA with Consolidated Constructions which contained a disputes settlement

procedure. Despite this, McDonald, the Assistant State Secretary of the CFMEU Western

Australi an Branch , stopped the site. He did so because he 'believed that industrial action was

necessary'. He was asked:

0: Does that mean that the disputes settlement procedure operates only when one party decides it will operate?

A: Yes, in this case, yeah, that's exactly what it meant.

0: The whole purpose of a disputes settlement procedure is to avoid industrial action and to let an umpire decide?

A: Yes.

0: Why didn't you follow it?

A: Because the person that was driving this issue was BGC, and it was an industry

issue so we took industrial action. There was a need for militant action and militant

action took place.

0: So if you reach the view that militant action is appropriate, you just disregard whatever agreement you've entered into?

A: As far as a recommendation for action, for strike action is concerned, yes I do. 109

And later:

0: What (it) really means is that you, as a union official, simply disregard the provisions of agreements that unions enter into?

A: No, I don't quite see it like that, but I do disregard any hint of a no strike clause. I do

disregard any hint of a no strike clause, yes.

0: What do you think the disputes settlement procedure means when it says that work will proceed as normal while the disputes procedure is implemented?

A: I don't want to say there hasn't been cases when that happened, but where I

participated it would be in the minority, if ever. 110

National Perspective Part 1 23

74 McDonald 's evidence was that the State Secretary, Reynolds , had never criticised him for

recommending strike action. When McDonald was asked what criteria were applied in reach ing

a decision whether or not to take strike action or apply the disputes resolution procedure, he

required time to think about that question . Ultimately his answer was, 'I think the answer to that

is there is no criteria. I think that would be the answer to it. Every dispute is on its merit.' 111

75 Thi s illustrates the pointlessness of reaching agreement with the CFMEU, for it will abide by

such agreements on ly when it suits its industrial purpose.

76 Further, McDonald expressed his goal of having every man as a 'card carrying member of the

appropriate union '. He was asked :

0: You had intention of using pressure to use all of your influence to shut down that job, unless Mr Brajkovich had his employees sign up and join the union, didn 't you?

A: I'm not sure how you'd define pressure, but it was my intention to try and close that

site down if everyone wasn't a financial member of the union, yes. 112

77 When asked if he had given thought to whether such conduct was lawfu l, he replied, 'No'. 113

McDonald held the view that every working man and woman should belong to a union, 11 4

effectively negating their right, preserved by the law, to individually decide whether they wished to join a union or not.

78 His view of an individual's right of freedom of association was summarised in the following

evidence:

0: Do you think that people have a right to choose whether or not they are members of a union?

A: I think there's areas where people should go and work if they don't want to belong

to a union, yeah.

0: And is it your view that those areas do not include the CBD of Perth?

A: Definitely

0: Why is that?

A: Hey?

0: Why is that?

A: Because that's the bastion of the trade union movement; that's where we draw the

line in the sand. 115

79 Th at line in the sand marked out the reality that in the CBD in Perth, a contractor could only

work on a project if it had a union-endorsed EBA, and a person could only work on a building

site if he or she joined the union.

80 Justice Scott in the Western Australian Supreme Court, accurately recorded McDonald's approach to undertakings given to the District Court:

[McDonald} paid scant regard to the undertaking ... its terms mattered little to him. He did not consider the undertaking to be of any particular significance and . . was not

concerned whether his conduct was in breach of that undertaking or not. 116

2 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

81 His contempt for the law was illustrated by his attitude towards strike pay which is illegal under

the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) . He said, 'Every time there 's been a strike, I've asked

for it.' 11 7 McDonald ag reed, in aski ng for strike pay, he did not 'pay regard to the law in relation to taking a shi lling from the ruling class and paying it to the workers' .11 8

82 McDonald's attitude illustrates an archaic view of industrial relations based upon 'class

strugg le' . He plain ly had no view of modern in dustrial relations, of co-operation , of seeking to

increase productivity for mutual benefit, but rather saw ind ustrial re lations as a brutish exercise

of power. His approach was typi fied by his conduct as illustrated in the Tom's Cranes case

study. There, McDonald was dissatisfied with the way in which he perceived a Royal

Commission investigator was seeking to meet a union official to discuss certain matters

associated with Tom's Cranes. To demonstrate his unhappiness he shut down cranes

successively on the 240 St George's Terrace site, the Panorama Apartments site, the Q-Con

site and the Mount Street site. The explanation for doing so was that because a detective from the Royal Commission had been 'hassling' an ex-employee of Tom 's Cranes so that

information could be obtained fro m him, the CFMEU was going to shut down Tom's Cranes .

He made no apolog ies for his behaviour. He thought th e example set by him was appropriate

and one which he was happy to set as Assistant State Secretary, for shop or job stewards. He

said that he would continue to behave as he did on the day he shut down the four cranes

unless and until somebody were to stop him. Once the Western Australian Task Force had

been closed down, there was no one to stop him.

83 The attitude of the CFMEU in Western Australia to the righ t of companies in dispute with the

CFMEU to use the processes of the AIRC to resolve the dispute is illustrated in the Bregma Pty

Limited case study. Bregma had agreed with its workers to split their rostered day off (ROO) so

that half worked on the nominated rostered day off and took their rostered day off two weeks

later. This was convenient to Bregma's clients . The CFMEU would not agree to this

arrangement. Bregma listed the matter for hearing in the AIRC on 28 February 2002. On

27 February 2002, McDonald and McCullough, a CFMEU organiser, attended the Sheraton site

where Bregma's employees were working with others. McDona!d told the meeting that Breg ma

had the CFMEU in the AI RC the following day regarding splitting of employees' designated

RDOs, that the CFM EU's position was that RDOs should be taken on the designated day, that

the CFMEU wanted Bregma's application withdrawn from the AIRC by the end of that day, that

if Bregma failed to withdraw its application from the AI RC by the end of that day, work at the

Sheraton site would stop and the site would be shut down. McDonald also told the meeting of

about 20 employees that if the application was heard by the AIRC the followin g day, Bregma

wou ld be successful and the CFMEU would lose.

84 McDonald and McCullough then went to another site, the Motorola site. They there met with

workers on that site including Bregma workers and told them the same. Th us, McDonald

threatened to close down two sites if Bregma exercised its rig ht to have the dispute resolved by

the AIRC. Bregma withdrew its application under pressure that two sites on which it and others

were working would stop. McDonald gave the following evidence:

Q: So if you could bring pressure to bear on Bregma to have it withdraw its application

before the Industrial Relations Commission, you believed it appropriate to do that?

National Perspective Part 1 25

A: Yes.

Q: And if that pressure included the workers to go out on strike unless the application

were withdrawn, you believed that that was appropriate as well.

A: Yes.

Q: And that's what you did?

A: Yes.

Q: And you succeeded in having the application withdrawn?

A: Yes.

Q: Because of the pressure you were able to bring to bear?

A: Because I was able to put more pressure on than the builder, yes. 119

85 The attitude of the CFMEU towards industrial relations was also expressed by two organisers

of the CFMEU, Mr Graham Pallot and Mr Daron Smith. The CFMEU was pursuing one of the

Doric Group companies, seeking to force it to enter into an EBA. 120 Doric was unresponsive.

Pallot said to Wakeling, a Doric manager:

I'm going to crucify Doric if this is the sort of people you employ and also the Casino if I

don't gain rights of entry when I choose. I will put 50 to 100 people on a picket line

outside the hotel.

86 In May 2001, after a change in government and the dismantling of the Western Australian Task

Force, Daron Smith said to McGivern, the Doric Site Manager:

Now that the Labor Party has won, we have four years to level the playing field. We will

take one builder at a time and pursue them until they play with us, or they crumble. At the

moment, it's your tum.

87 The attitude of the CFMEU , and its State Secretary, Reynolds, to the ru le of law was illustrated

by the Worsley Expansion Project case study. Haslemore was the joint venture Employee Relations Manager. Disputes arose. A CFMEU organiser came on site. Haslemore asked him

why he did not fol low the disputes resolution procedure. The organiser replied, 'Stuff the

disputes procedure'. On another occasion, the organiser said to a joint venture manager:

You guys just don't understand. We rule the site and we will do what we want to do.

88 Has lemore was told by union officials on more than one occasion that:

Disrupting the work was considered to be part of the CFMEU's strategy based on the

premise that disrupting work was what the members expected and was an important

element to increasing membership.

89 Th ere were frequent strikes despite a project agreement wh ich included a disputes resolution

procedure permitting work to continue whi le matters in dispute were resolved. At a partners '

review forum attended by representatives of the joint venture, the AMWU, the CEPU and the

CFMEU , union representatives expressed concern that the AIRC had imposed a total of three 'no strike' s127 orders. Reynolds said:

26 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

I want you to back off from the 12 7 order

90 McDonald said, 'You should request that the other employers who are party to the 127 order

back off.' Haslemore indicated their requests were inappropriate. Reynolds threatened a

prolonged strike i{ the contractor applicants for the s127 orders failed to guarantee they would

not enforce their rights in the event of unions breaching those orders. He said, 'The unions have

decided to convene a stop work meeting of all employees on the project on

Friday 18 June 1999. If you do not respond by advising me that you wi ll back off from the

127 Orders, the whole site wi ll take strike action on Friday 18 June for a prolonged period .'

91 On 1 July 1999 Messrs McDonald, Murphy, Pa llot and McCullough, the CFM EU Assistant

Secretary and organisers shut down certain cranes on the project on the pretence of safety

issues. Kerr, a contractor representative, asked the organisers if their actions were 'Some sort

of payback for anything [the company] had done'. Pallot replied , 'Withdraw the Section

127 and we will leave you alone' .

92 The reality in Western Australia is that the CFMEU is not prepared to tolerate decisions being

made by the umpire designated by the Commonwealth Parliament under the Workplace

Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), or agreed to in project agreements. It prefers the use of unlawful

industrial action.

Tasmania

93 In Tasmania Mr Benson, the Branch Secretary of the CFMEU, Tasmanian Divisional Branch

attended a meeting on 24 August 2000 of Master Plumbers. He told the meeting that there

were a number of larger projects coming up in Hobart involving funding from the Construction

& Building Unions Superannuation Fund (Cbus). He said that on those projects things were

going to be 'different'. He said that EBAs would be required from head contractors and

subcontractors on these sites, and that union membership was 'expected' or 'required' on these sites. 121

94 In August or September 2000 there was a meeting between Mr Killick of Fairbrother Pty Ltd

(Fairbrother), a major contractor, and Messrs Murphy and Harkins from the CEPU. The purpose

of the meeting was to tell Killick that the union was sick and tired of Tasmanian plumbers and

electricians not having EBAs. Murphy told Killick that he had spoken to his union in Melbourne

and that workers 'on the Chadstone Shopping Centre in Melbourne [another site of

Fairbrother's cl ient] would stop work until the Tasmanian employees were on an EBA.' They

advised Killick that 'they would make our life hell on the cinemas project as the roof plumber,

plumber and electrician did not have an EBA'. He said that the CEPU would organise 'a

boatload of unemployed thugs ' from Melbourne to 'sort us out', and Harkins said, if necessary,

they would 'block off the entrance to the site with the truck in the middle of a concrete pour' .122

95 When first seeking to introduce enterprise bargaining ag reements into Tasmania, Bukarica,

then the National Assistant Secretary of the Construction and General Division of the CFM EU,

and Benson , the State Branch Secretary, said that if agreement could be reached it would avoid the industrial unrest that occurred in Victoria, and would thus avoid the need for visits by

organisers from the mainland. 123 There was a plain understanding that causing loss was an

effective means of achieving industrial objectives.

National Perspective Part 1 27

The attitude of head contractors and subcontractors

96 Head contractors and subcontractors have an attitude of resigned acceptance. They have a

feeling that the industry, as it presently exists, has not chang ed in any material respects for a

long period, and that there is effectively nothing which they can do to improve the industry.

They accept the power and dominance of unions. As business people, they take a pragmatic

view that they will conduct business in the existing conditions in whatever way they can, which

is most profitable for their enterprise. While being frustrated that unions have such dominance

and have usurped aspects of control of their businesses, they accept that the highly

competitive business in which they operate means that there is no unified approach by

business, whether head contractors or subcontractors, towards resisting demands by the

uni ons . They fear being singled out by unions because of the great loss which can occur to an

individual contractor, and thus accede to industrywide arrangements. They regard it as

preferable to accept restrictive practices affecting the flexibility and productivity of their

businesses than to seek to improve productivity by arrangements which would attract the ire of

unions. The costs occasioned by unlawful industrial action are accepted because resistance or

recovery attempts would generate more industrial disputes and further costs. They see no

effecti ve mechanism to protect them from unlawful industrial action, or efficiently to enable them to recover losses from such action. As businessmen and women, they seek to minimise

loss, endeavour to bring in the current project at a profi t, and then concentrate on the next project. Th is short term focus means they have no interest in changing the existing structure

unless driven to do so . As a result, their behaviour reinforces the ills of wh ich they complai n in

the industry, namely, union power, the culture and attitudes of union officials, and the

ineffecti veness of mechanisms for resolving disputes.

97 The major head contractors, mainly Australian Constructors Association (ACA) members, who

each transact more th an $200 million of work each year, and Groco n Limited have the financial

capacity to generate change. However, each recognises the competitive circumstance that, for

major projects, there are a limited number of contractors with the capacity to tender. They also

accept that if they are in dispute with the unions , the prospect of being the selected tenderer is

diminished. Th ey know that if they take a principled stand and resist unlawful industrial action,

they will be singled out and caused further loss, and that their competitors will eagerly seize the

projects they might otherwise have won. Th is individual understanding and acceptance means

that there is no concerted approach by all the major contractors to stand together against un lawful industrial action. Their bel ief in disunity, commercial pragmatism, and the

predominance of self-interest is reinforced by the experience in 2000 in negotiation of the

bargaining round when, after some months of dispute, first Grocon, then Multi plex broke from

the group and reached agreement w ith the unions. The remaining head contractors thereafter believed they had no option but to reach similar ag reements to avoid continu ing loss. That

battle was said to have cost $65 million and, with flow on effects, $175 million to the Victorian economy.

98 This desire not to be sing led out by the unions means that they wi ll not resist unlawful industrial

action unless forced to do so, and unless each is satisfied that others will be equally obliged to

resist such action .

2 8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

99 It was demonstrated in South Australia in 1994 that if major contractors stood together and

resisted inappropriate or unlawful demands, in that in stance compulsory unionism on major

CBD sites, 124 they could succeed . However, such a show of unity is ra re because of a short

term pragmatic view of profitability.

1 00 Most subcontractors are in a different position . Most are smal l businesses with 94 per cent of

contractors in the industry employing fewer than five people. Many are poorly capitalised and

depend upon the cash flow from continuous work to continue. They operate in a highly

competitive low profit margin sector, and know that they have no prospect whatsoever of

resisting continuous union pressure. Th ey know that if they do not accede to union demands,

they will not be selected by the head contractor for fear of there being disruption on the project.

They also know that there are many competitors ready to take their place. They are pressured

by unions to accede to demands on the one hand, and by head contractors also to accede to

those demands to avoid disruption to the head contractor's project on the other. They are

reliant on the head contractor for cash flow and do not have the resou rces to withstand

disruption to that flow. The interests of the head contractors and the unions thus, in a curious

way, coincide to put irresistible pressure on the subcontractors, who provide between 90 per

cent and 95 per cent of the labour to bui ld projects, to concede to the unions' demands. They,

as do the head contractors, also accept that neither the Austra li an Industrial Relations

Commission, nor the courts, can give them adequate timely relief to prevent them from

suffering significant losses, or to recover those losses. If they do take loss recovery action

against unions they know that in future, their projects will be disrupted.

101 It is of importance to note that of the 692 800 people engaged in the industry, 248 100, or 36

per cent, are subcontractors or 'own account workers '. Less than 25 per cent of the total

workforce belong to a union. These figures are indicative of an industry where more than three

quarters of the workforce do not wish to be involved with unions, and more than one third have

an attitude of independence and self reliance . Much of the workforce thus exemplifies the small

business culture.

102 To begin to understand the attitude of head contractors and contractors, it is necessary to have

an overall understanding of the nature of a modern building or construction project. Most head

contractors are requ ired by their contract with the client, be it a government or private cl ient, to

assume the financial risk of project based industrial relations. Further, their contract is normally

a fixed price contract requiring project delivery by a specified date. Th e provisions permitting

extensions of time are limited as are the provisions addressing variation in price. Costs and ti me

attributable to site specific industrial relations risk are usually not within those provisions. Thus

the head contractor bears that risk. Being a fixed price contract there are usually liquidated

damages provisions providing for significant sums to be payable for each day of late delivery. In

construction of buildings or facilities for commercial enterprises or operations, the loss payable

by way of liquidated damages relates to the loss which the client may suffer in consequence of

late delivery.

103 The organisation of a major construction work is a matter of great complexity. Most major

contractors, with the exception of Grocon, do not have a substantial workforce which engages

in the construction process. The head contractor is essentially a manager who engages a

series of subcontractors to perform various packages making up the total works. Those

National Perspective Part 1 29

packages commence with demolition or excavation, and conclude with the finishing trades.

There is a close sequencing and interrelationship between all of the trades engaged on a

project. A measure of the complexity of the programming task, and th e interrelationship of one

trade with another, is demonstrated by the fact that on a major project there may be at least

1 00 and perhaps 200 subcontractors engaged. Not all are on site at the one time but one

subcontractor must integrate its work with the subcontractor who precedes it, and many other

subcontractors who may be working in close proximity.

1 04 Through the sequenci ng of the works, there can be found at least one critical path. That means

that if there is delay to an activity on that path , the total construction time for the project wi ll be

extended. Some activities are sub-critical but may become critical during a contract if there are

delays associated with particular tasks .

1 05 On any significant building project, a most important aspect is cranage. All of the materials and

equipment necessary to construct a project must be lifted into position. Stoppages or

interference with the cranage operations will necessarily impact adversely on all tasks . This is

well understood by all industry participants and explain s why the CFMEU is especi al ly keen to

control the operators of cranes, and to ensure, where possible, that a union -nominated

representative operates those cranes. It enables the CFMEU to effectively control progress on

the site. In Western Australia, permission is required from the CFMEU before a crane can be

erected an d it nominates who wirl drive the cran e. In Queensland permission is req uired from

the BLF Q pri or to the erection of a crane. That head contractors have devolved thi s critical

function to the control of the unions is a measure of the extent to which man agement has succumbed to uni on pressure.

106 Due to the close interrelationship of sequential trades, and th e great number of them, the

capacity to cause disruption , delay and attendant costs relating to standing charges and

liquidated damages is immense. There needs to be a co-operat ive and flexible approach to

enable the project to be constructed on time and with in budget. That co-operati ve approach is

required from the subcontractors and thei r workforces. Thus it is the task of the head

contractor to endeavour to co-ordinate the subcontractors and to adjust the construction

process to accommodate unforeseen events or circumstances that occur. In addition, as many

construction projects, or stages of them, are subject to weather uncertainty, whi le provision for

wet weather is anticipated in the overall construction time, the period when it occurs, and its

effect on the construction process can not be foreseen. This introduces a further requirement for flexibility.

1 07 All of these matters are well understood by parti cipants in th e industry, including head

contractors, subcontractors, constructi on workers , specialist tradesmen , and the unions.

1 08 While the construction process involves complexity from a head contractor's perspective,

subcontractors have a similarly complex task. The construction process is broken down into

smaller packages wh ich means that the specialist contractors may be on site on a project only

for a limited time, or for a series of short periods of ti me. Others may be there for longer. To

endeavour to maintain continuity of a subcontracting business, subcontractors must bid for

many jobs. Th ey endeavour to sequence their work on various projects on which they may be engaged at the one time to accommodate the head contractor's construction schedule. Delay

30 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

or disruption on a particu lar project may th row out their scheduli ng of work on many other

projects. On the other hand, disruption or stoppage on a particular job may enable them to

transfer their workforce or part of it to another project. Thus great flexibil ity is req uired in the

management and operation of the subcontracting business, and from the subcontractor's

workforce. It is a notable ci rcumstance that in the bui lding and construction in dustry, 94 per

cent of subcontractors are small , having five employees or less. This potentially gives them the

flexibility to deal with their employees in a manner which can accommodate their requirements

to work on differing sites in changing circumstances. However, if conditions of employment are

imposed upon the subcontractor's business by inflexible pattern agreements, all that flexib ility

is lost, and the wishes of employees cannot be accommodated .

109 Head contractors endeavour to pass risk down the contractual chain. They impose upon the

subcontractor liquidated damages for its fa il ure to complete its subcontract package in

accordance with the construction programme, either as initially determined or as varied . The

extent of allocation of risk may vary, but in essence, subcontractors carry a sign ificant risk of

damages for non-performance on time. This introduces a further requ irement upon them for

flexibility of performance.

110 It is against this structure of pre-planni ng, dependent interrelationships, and flexible

requirements that contractors and subcontractors confront the unions' desire for control of

major projects, rigidity and uniform ity of wage and conditi ons outcomes, and the recognised

potential of unions through industrial action, either lawful or unlawful, to cause them loss . It is

against th is background that unions sought pattern enterprise bargain ing agreements with

commonality of wages and conditions, fixed hours of work, fixed RDOs and limited flexibility. As

will be obvious, the more rigid the employment structures, the greater potential to impact upon

productivity on a given project, or in the case of subcontractors who provide most of the

labour, on many projects.

111 Head contractors and subcontractors recognise the real risk of loss. They also recognise that

even if the loss be caused by unlawful industrial conduct, the reality is, at present, it is

irrecoverable.

112 The potential for loss from standing charges and liquidated damages is read ily assessed. Head

contractors and subcontractors know the potential loss suffered from a delay. They can assess

the cost of demands made by unions, whether lawful or unlawfu l. They take a commercial

decision whether to concede the demands or not, based on economic criteria.

113 Grocon described the characteri stics of the build ing and constructi on industry, and attendant

risks in the fo llowing terms:

The nature of the construction workplace features commercial, structural and physical

characteristics which distinguish it from most other industries, and which in combination

perhaps contribute to some of its problems.

• Commercial risk: By its very nature, each construction project represents a substantial economic commitment for the client, and an urgent requirement for the

investment to begin contributing return within a specifically defined (and usually

very tight) time frame. That commercial risk is inevitably passed on through the

contracts from the client to the principal contractor, and then to each

National Perspective Part 1 3 i

contractor/subcontractor in turn with the consequence that considerable liability

resides with businesses which can ill afford the responsibility. This simply translates

into an environment in which it is sometimes more affordable to concede union

demands, rather than run the risk of facing liquidated damages. The 'affordability'

of giving in to the unions is further enhanced on occasions if the cost of concession can be assured of flowing on to the rest of the industry (thus ensuring no long-term

loss of competitive advantage). Such cost is even further defrayed if

implementation of the concession can be deferred to future contracts (and thus

included in future project costs).

• Subcontracting: By its very nature, the construction process requires that much

of the work be subcontracted out to appropriate specialist businesses. Grocon is unique among Australia's major builders, in that we directly employ our own

personnel concerned with the structural erection aspect of the process. Even so,

we must still utilise subcontractors in the various services (plumbing and electrical)

etc, and in the fit-out and finishing stages of our projects. The incidence of

subcontracting is, to our understanding, a particular aspect of this industry which

largely distinguishes it from most others, and it can certainly raise issues of debate

as regards the 'loyalty' of workers to the enterprise versus loyalty to the union.

However, we think the incidence of subcontracting does not itself increase the volume of job turnover in the industry, or result in a 'hire and fire' regime as is

sometimes implied in popular media reports. In fact, work continuity and job

security can be - and frequently is - very high within those subcontractors who are

successful in winning a volume of work on successive projects through which they

can rotate their workforce. And no successful builder or subcontractor engages in

hire and fire as a deliberate bus1ness strategy. Skilled and experienced workers are

a valuable resource and not to be used in such a fashion. In fact, this method of

employment provides more certainty than would be the case if workforces were

assembled and disassembled on a project by project basis.

Grocon believes that our Industrial relations systems presently provide no practical

protection against unlawful industrial action by trade unions. This conduct is not policed.

It is, in our opinion, this absence of immediate and certain retribution for industrial

misconduct which, at least in part, leads to a construction industry in which

confrontation, not co-operation, is accepted in many cases as being normal.

In addition, access to the refuge of 'protected industrial action' during the agreement

bargaining period has been used by the construction unions so as to create an

advantage that we do not think was intended.

To address these issues, we believe the Workplace Relations Act should be revised so as

to bring greater fairness and equity to the bargaining process, to require genuine

bargaining, and to provide for timely and effective recourse to legal restraint in the case of unlawful action. Th ere should be some time limit on the protected action. It should not be

allowed to drag on.

32 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

In addition, it should be a requirement of the law that an organisation found guilty of

unlawful industrial action should be liable to be penalised, notwithstanding that the action

may have ceased. As things presently stand, the unions have found that they can with

impunity engage in unlawful industrial action until such time as an employer, in frustration

- and having exhausted the preliminary consultative processes of the Disputes

Procedure- seeks orders under s127a. This can see the particular site or project exposed to industrial disruption for some time while the processes of notification and

listing for hearing unfold. And at the hearing of the application, the unions will frequently

pursue the strategy of arguing that the action - even if it was unlawful - has ceased, or

some acceptable solution has emerged, or is accessible to the parties. The AIRC

proceeds to endorse a resolution of the issue, and deems the matter successfully

settled. But in fact the employer has experienced the considerable cost of the period of

unlawful industrial action, and is exposed to the potential for future industrial action if the

whole costly and time-consuming process is repeated. 125

114 I agree entirely with that analysis .

115 A not dissimilar approach was found in the submission of Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd

addressing the Queensland Statement of Intent, that being an unregistered industrywide

agreement. Adherents to the Statement of Intent are required to agree for themselves , and their

subcontractors, particular wage structures and conditions. It was entered into in the hope of

industrial stability. The Multiplex submission stated:

Is there an alternative?

It is submitted that there is no workable alternative available to major contractors other

than agreeing with the major building unions the wage structure on major projects.

This conclusion must be set against a background where there is no workable economic

recourse available to employers to protect themselves against wild cat and unlawful

industrial action by the militant unions [who dominate] the construction industry.

Conclusion

Regardless of what the reasonable opinions may be among the management of major

contractors, including Multiplex, its [sic] is not the business of contractors to deliver

political or philosophical outcomes on industrial relations. In light of the substantial risks

involved in contracting and the disportionately [sic] low margins, contractors necessarily

focus on delivering certainty and stability in industrial relations to manage that species of

risk.

If governments want a certain political or philosophical result, they can legislate to

achieve that. Governments have enacted the current industrial legislative framework

which, in the building and construction industry, has delivered to the industry pattern

bargaining which is very like the old award system except for the following:

• Wages are higher.

• Unions no longer have to get the1r demands tested in the appropriate

industrial relations tribunals.

National Perspective Part 1 33

• Employers have no real choice but to capitulate to union pattern demands.

• Unions maintain membership through the EBA system, not by workers exercising any freedom of choice.

The statement of intent is a way in which employers get something out of the system -relative industrial stability. 126

116 Mr Bickerdike, a Director of Multiplex Queensland, made the foll owing observations:

... neither the union nor its members, carry any potentia/liability for the damage caused

by what is often unlawful industrial action.

On the other hand, the contractor, and potentially all subcontractors, are subject to both

liquidated damages and the expenditure of unproductive preliminaries.

Although unions are, as I understand it, liable at common law for damages, it is not

practical to enforce that right for damages for the following reasons:

• Most contractors, and certainly Multiplex, avoid formal disputes [that is,

disputes conciliated and arbitrated in an industrial tribunal] because they are

time-consuming, costly and rarely result in positive outcomes.

• It would be extremely damaging to any kind of relationship between a

contractor and a union to be engaged in ongoing civil proceedings seeking damages.

The unions would predictably see this kind of action as highly provocative and that would

throw into jeopardy any semblance of certainty of industrial relations in all of Multiplex's

operations in Queensland. Accordingly, civil action is not a realistic commewal option.

Whatever view an outsider may take, if any contractor does not have a cooperative

relationship with the relevant building unions, that contractor will not be in business long. 72 7

117 In the Multiplex Constructions (Queens land) Pty Ltd submission, the position of head

contractors was summarised in the following terms:

In summary, the head contractor's only available course is to engage in CONTROLLED

CAPITULATION (original emphasis). 128

118 In Tasmania, a major builder, Fairbrother, required its subcontractors to have uni on-endorsed

EBAs. Mr Royce Fairb rother explained the reason for this decision. He said he had come to the

decision only to use subcontractors wi th union-endorsed EBAs because a lot of pressure had been put on his company by the unions. He had concluded it was not worth his while dealing

with companies that had not signed EBAs with the union because of the threat of industrial

disruption. The ri sk of disrupti on was in Tasmania and also on the mainland. Thu s, anyone

wantin g to work on Fairbrother sites in Tasmania would have to sign an EBA with the CFMEU

or the CEPU as one of the parties. The agreement was an endeavour to minimise the potential for damage across the whole Fairbrother business in Tasmania and elsewhere arising from industrial action causing loss by the un ions . 129

34 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

119 Baulderstone also referred to the realities in the building and construction industry. In its

submission concerning the National Gallery of Victoria Redevelopment - Phase 3, it wrote:

It must be remembered that BH operates in the real world, and in a competitive one. As

Dempsey [Baulderstone's then Chief Executive] said in answer to Counsel Assisting .. . :

'Mr Tracey, the issue between subcontractors and their employees is really one for

them, but we are trying to get projects built. We operate in an industry where we

have to get the jobs finished, so we operate in a way that attempts to - certainly

allows us to complete the projects, but also comply with the law, and we don't set

out to break the law, but we understand the rea lities of working in our industry

0: What are those realities?

A: That the unions have enormous influence and control and that unless you find a way to work with them , then you won 't finish your projects.

This is not to be fatalistic about inappropriate behaviour by other persons or

organisations, but it is to recognise the reality that, at base, it is the law that defines the

norms by which commercial and industrial parties must conduct themselves. A company

such as BH must obey the law, but beyond that its responsibilities are to its shareholders

and other stakeholders . If there is a lawful course of action that would be to the

advantage of those persons, BH would normally follow it. If it does not do so, a

competitor will. If BH had not resolved the Shop Steward imbroglio on the NGV project,

presumably there were other constructors which could have taken its place. 130

120 Thi s was the common explanation for the so-called 'commercial solution ' to industrial

problems, including the response to unlawful industrial action. No contractor wanted to be

sing led out. Each feared the damage uni ons could cause. Each recognised competitive

pressure. Each recognised there was no effective preventative or loss recovery mechanism .

And so each gave in on th e best terms available.

121 Such attitudes reinforce union dominance in the industry. It results in freedom of association

and freedom of bargaining being oppressed. It means unlawful industrial action is rewarded.

Governments

122 The attitude of governments has been one of intermittent interest. Th e deregistration of the BLF

in the I 980s resulted simply in those controlli ng the deregistered organisation continuing to

operate through State organisations. Some moved to other federal organisations . The culture

continued in those bodies . In the five years between 1990 and 1995, New South Wales

showed some interest with the Gyles Royal Commission , a recommendation of deregistration,

an agreement with the unions which avoided th at, the establishment of a Task Force and its

abolition. Western Australia showed some slight interest in 1994 with the establishmen t of a

Task Force but, within seven years, it had been abolished resulting in the reappearance of all

the restrictive practices which existed in the 1980s and early 1 990s. Victoria showed some

interest with the establishment of the Inquiry into the Victorian Building and Construction

Industry between 1992 and 1994 but it reported on party lines and little came of it.

National Perspective Part 1 35

123 The Commonwealth showed some interest with an Industry Commission Report on

Construction Costs of Major Projects in 1991, the establishment of the Construction Industry

Development Agency (C IDA) in 1992, the establishment of the National Building and

Construction Committee in 1 997, the release in 1 999 of the Building and Construction

Industries Action Agendas, and a Productivity Commission Report in 1 999 on Work

Arrangements on Large Capital City Projects.

124 Each of these bodies, to a greater or lesser extent, considered the problems in the industry and

plans for its improvement and reform . Each of the Commonwealth and each State and Territory

during the 1 990s, established Codes of Practice - but, with one notable exception, no one

adheres to them and no one enforces them.

125 This melancholy history of a decade of intermittent interest and activity has had the perverse

effect that as each flurry of activity to reform the industry, stamp out unlawfulness and increase

productivity, has faded to nothing, the un ions have taken strength from their ability to resist

these endeavours. The failure of governments to put in place appropriate structural

mechanisms to permit the industry to operate fairly and efficiently has been greatly assisted by

the unwillingness of major contractors to resist pressure and unlawful action. State reforms,

while producing some short term improvements, are rendered ineffective by the capacity of

unions to impose industrial and commercial pressure on major contractors' operations in other

States which in turn results in those contractors requiring subcontractors to accede to unions ' demands.

126 The failure of governments to put in place the structural framework to allow the growth of a

more productive industry in which the rights of individuals and businesses are respected and

protected, has been compounded by the absence of any entity charged with, and interested in ,

enforcing the law. The State pol ice forces throughout Australia play no part on construction

sites . The Office of the Employment Advocate is ill -equipped to do so and , prior to the

establishment of the Interim Task Force in October 2002, there was nobody else to do so.

127 Discussion Paper 7 sets out a history of recent industrial relations events in the Australian

bui lding and construction industry. It details the history of governments' interventions since the

early 1 980s, and in particular, from 1 990 to date. It is found in volume 4 of this report.

128 I will not attempt to summarise it but it is necessary reading to understand the background to

the present state of the industry. A number of matters emerge:

• Many of the persons involved in the industry in the early 1 980s at the time of the

deregistration of the BLF remain as prominent officials of the CFMEU . They include Mr John Cummins, Mr Kevi n Reynolds and Mr John Setka, amongst others.

• The attitudes disclosed by the evidence in this Royal Commission are similar to those the subject of prior Commissions, inquiries and reports. The culture has not changed.

• In 1985, when Mr Gall agher, General Secretary of the BLF was being tried on corruption

charges, the BLF sought by industrial action, to prevent the trials. Mr Brian Boyd, then a BLF organiser, described the action taken:

The first phase of the industrial campaign to stop the consequences of the Royal

Commission bribes allegations going to Court occurred from the latter part of 1980

36 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

to December 1984. The second phase was during the actual County Court trial

February to June 1985, when various activities were deliberately encouraged by

Gallagher in an attempt to have the trial aborted. The general idea at this point was

to create an adverse atmosphere and generate a level of media coverage that

would have the prospect of a 'fair trial' declared to have been prejudiced.

Now the objective of the third phase is to 'convince' the powers that be it is not

worth their while tore-prosecute Gallagher 731

It was Mr Brian Boyd, now Secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall Council, who organised

the demonstrations and protests against this Royal Commission and the demonstrations

in support of Mr Kingham . Th e same tactics continue.

• In July 1990, when the Gyles Royal Commission was announced, the National Secretary

of the BWIU branded it 'A conspiracy against militant unionism in general, an d the BWIU

in particular'.132 He later complained that 'From day one of the Royal Commission, the

union called upon Commissioner Gyles to investigate corruption and illegal behaviour in

relation to tax avoidance, "cash in hand" payments, under-payments of wages and

breaches of safety and award regulations. But Gyles gave little attention to these issues '. 133

The present Secretary of the Construction and General Division of the CFMEU ,

Mr Sutton, made the same demands on this Royal Commission and makes the same complaint.

• Commonwealth Governments and various Stafe Governments, of both po litical

persuasions , have been concerned with seeking methods to control industrial relations

and increase productivity in the industry. Governments of both political persuasions have failed in that en deavour.

• Since at least 1991 , governments, Royal Commissions, the Prod uctivity Commission

and various inquiries have been concerned about the exploitation of safety disputes,

inclement weather, restrictive work practices, industrial relations problems, 'last on/first

off ', overtime, management, pay for industrial action, an d union membership. None has

solved those problems.

• All governments have recognised that matters just referred to adversely affect productivity.

• From at least 1992 , the CFMEU has been fostering pattern bargaining. Its strategy was

to target the major contractors who in turn, were to encourag e subcontractors working on their sites to enter into similar enterprise ag reements , with unions attempting to have

the wages and conditions binding subcontractors at particular major projects applied at

all sites at which the subcontractor works. That still occurs.

• Since th e late 1980s, governments have been seeking to use codes of conduct as a method of encouraging standards of conduct in the industry. Every endeavour at a State

and Federal level has failed .

National Perspective Part 1 3 7

• Two Task Forces and the Office of the Employment Advocate have been established in

an endeavour to moderate unlawful and inappropriate conduct. Due to pressure from

unions, both Task Forces were soon abolished, and the Office of the Employment

Advocate neutralised.

• Since the Federal Labor Government introduced legislation in I 993 seeking to foster

bargaining at the enterprise level, and introduce flexibility into industry structures,

Governments of both persuasions, federally and in the States, have done likewise. The

unions have successfully resisted these endeavours principally by pressuring contractors

and subcontractors to enter into pattern agreements, with consequential pressure to

defeat freedom of association concepts.

• The process of industrywide regulation has been assisted by avoiding the provisions of

Commonwealth legislation by entering into unregistered industry agreements, in

particular, the Victorian Building Industry Agreement (VB IA), and the Queensland

Statement of Intent. These facilitate and reinforce pattern bargaining.

• In seeking to ensure industrial disruption does not delay facilities for internationally

prominent events, the New South Wales Government, and more recently, the Victorian Government, reached an accommodation with the unions. The accommodation involved

payment of wages and conditions superior to the norm. They also involved project

agreements between governments, Labor Councils, employers, unions and employees.

• There has never been true enterprise bargaining in projects in the CBDs of major capital

cities or major regional centres. Th e productivity gains from flexibility anticipated more

than a decade ago have not been achieved because of union resistance to enterprise

bargaining.

129 The reali ty is that, while the level of unlawful and inappropriate practices and conduct in the

building and construction industry may have fluctuated to some extent for short periods, all

endeavours of government to introduce proper standards of industrial conduct and respect for

basic freedoms and rights into the building and construction industry have failed.

130 The Tasman ian Government contended that unlawful or otherwise inappropriate industrial or

workplace practices or conduct, 'are not features of the building and construction industry in

this State' .134 I have found that contention is unsustainable. I heard evidence of widespread

unlawful or otherwise inappropriate conduct in the industry in Tasmania. The evidence

suggests the situation in that State is worsening.

131 In Queensland, the Minister for Public Works and Minister for Housing in January 2000 sought

to persuade a contractor who did not wish to do so , to enter into an enterprise bargaining

agreement, telling him, 'It is compulsory to sign if your registration to tender on State

Government projects is to continue' .135 His belief was that union-endorsed 'EBAs were a fact

of industrial life'. The Minister had intended to make it a condition of contract for Government work, that the contractor have an EBA with a union. He was dissuaded from that course upon

being advised such a provision would contravene the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth) . The Minister said:

38 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Contractors who have a record of failing to complete contracts on time, for whatever

reason, are at risk of failing to win further government contracts. Sometimes, the reasons

for late completion may be out of the control of the contractor, in which case, I would

expect due allowance to be made. However, if the remedy for the reason for late

completion is within the control of the contractor and it refuses or otherwise fails to avail

itself of the solution, it is my belief that it is perfectly reasonable for that contractor to expect that further contracts will not be offered.136

132 It was th e Minister's view that industrial disputation is one reason for late completion, enterprise

agreements with the relevant un ions are a 'remedy' for or a 'solution' to in dustrial disputation,

and if the contractor fails to avai l itself of that remedy or solution it could not reasonably expect

further Queensland Government work. In the Rockhampton case study, it was plain , indeed it

was admitted by the BLF 0 and an organiser that subcontractors were not permitted to work

without an enterprise bargaining agreement with the BLF 0. Such a position was un lawful as

was admitted in undertakings given by the union to the ACCC. Yet that approach had the

support of the Minister.

133 As I concluded:

A sovereign State Government, and its Ministers, are, of course, entitled to act in such

manner as the applicable laws allow, and to legislate within power to change applicable

laws. The executive government similarly, may act in such manner, and adopt and

enforce such policies within the law as it decides. One can understand and accept the

interest of a State as a client in monitoring projects to ensure their being built on time and

within budget. However, to propose that a contractor should surrender to unlawful

conduct by a third party and submit to the third party's demands in order to be able to

achieve performance on time and within budget under threat that non-performance due

to such unlawful conduct will result in deprivation of the right to tender for or be awarded

government work, does not accord with the usual policy positions adopted by

governments. If governments do not protect those who act within the law, or if

governments reward those who breach the law, the rule of law is diminished.

134 In Western Australia, the present Government abolished a Task Force and replaced it with a

body which has not proven effecti ve . Since that event in early 2001 , practices which had not

been prominent have re-emerged . They include 'no ticket no start' practices, 'no pattern EBA

no start' practices, threats of industrial action, enteri ng premises irrespective of right, re­

emergence of intimidatory, coercive and threaten in g behaviour in pursuit of industrial demands,

and effective compulsory unionism on CBD sites . I agree with the view of the Executive Director

of the MBA WA that the statement by the Premier that 'no ticket no start ' signs on building sites

were merely a form of advertising 137 of a view sent a powerful and unfortunate message that

there was no true freedom of association on building sites in the Perth CBD.

135 In Victoria, Able Demolitions was involved in four case studies considered by me. In the Holland

Estate case study, I concluded:

Able was involved in four projects considered by me. They are the National Gallery of

Victoria, the Port Melbourne Flats, Latrobe Regional Hospital and Holland Estate. In all

four studies, the only difficulties arising in the relationship between Able and th e State

National Perspective Part 1 39

flowed from Able's relationship with the CFMEU. In one case study, the State of Victona

accepted that it had acted inappropriately In that and two of the other three instances

the evidence establishes that Victoria departed from normal contractual processes and

outcomes and departed from independent assessments of the superiority of Able's

tender, because of the State's concern that the performance of Able might be affected by

acts, which would be unlawful, of the CFMEU.

Contractors that do not have good relations with the CFMEU are disadvantaged in

tender and contractual processes and outcomes within the State of Victoria. Those that

do have good relations with the CFMEU are correspondingly advantaged. This gives the

CFMEU enormous power. Contractors wishtng to contract with the State of Victoria are

obliged in their own commercial interest to accede to demands or reqwrements of the

CFMEU. That necessarily regulates the conditions of employment of the contractor's

employees. It diminishes or negates competitive contracting. It introduces into the

contracting process the influence of a third party which has no place 1n that process. It

increases cost, and time, for both the letting of and performance of the contract.

It is, of course, a matter for the State of Victoria to decide how it conducts its contractual

affairs. It is entitled as a sovereign State to manage its affairs within the law as its

Parliament and Executive determines.

The position adopted by Victona was that it is entitled to act in its own commercial

interest. It has a legitimate concern to ensure its contracts are delivered on time and on

budget. If a contractor cannot ensure such delivery, it should not be selected. One task

of a contractor is to manage industrial relations. If it cannot do this adequately it should be down-graded 1n the tender process. That was what had occurred with Able.

The fallacy in this position is plain. Industrial relations should concern an employer and its

employees. They should not involve a union with which the contractor has no contractual

relationship and of which the contractor's employees are not members. It is not the fault

of a contractor that a union, here the CFMEU, wants to have the contractor's employees as members and wants to have an EBA with the contractor. It is not the fault or the

responsibility of a contractor that a union may act unlawfully because the contractor and

its employees resist the union's demands. The company and its employees are lawfully

entitled to resist such demands. To disadvantage the contractor because it resists the

demands of a third party union is to disadvantage a contractor that acts lawfully and to

advantage a union that acts unlawfully That IS not a usual policy outcome.

136 The Commonwealth seeks to uphold the principles embedded in the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth), including freedom of association and bargaining at the enterprise level by

application of the Natio nal Code of Conduct. It insisted on that Code applying to the Lavarack

Barracks Development in Queensland. 138 Th iess was the contractor. The CFMEU recognised

that 'rigorous enforcement of the Federal Government's Code of Conduct' was an emerging

difficulty for it. It organised stoppages on Thiess sites in New South Wales, Victoria and

Queensland . The senior officers of the CFMEU around Australia agreed that if the matter was not resolved to the union's satisfaction, workers on Thiess mine sites wou ld take industrial

action as well. The difficulty for Th iess was intense. It was a signatory to the Statement of Intent

40 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

which obliged it, and its contractors, to pay certain benefits. The Code of Conduct did not

permit payment of such benefits. The solution was a project agreement provid ing for such

payments, but the Commonwealth would not agree to a project agreement unless a benefit to

it could be shown. The solution achieved was that instead of Thiess or its subcontractors

agreein g to pay the benefits, Thiess gave an assurance that it would 'use its best endeavours'

to ensure that the benefits were paid. In fact, they were paid. I have found that Thiess breached

the Code and Implementation Guidelines by a method suggested by office rs of the

Commonwealth familiar with the Code of Conduct. The matter was not investigated by the

Code Monitoring Group, or the Office of the Employment Advocate. The mechanisms of the

Commonwealth Government thus failed to ensure adherence to proper principles enunciated

in the Code of Conduct. There is no point in having a Code of Conduct unless it is enforced .

Indeed, there has never been any sanction imposed upon any party dealing with the

Commonwealth for breach of the National Code of Conduct.

137 It will be apparent that I regard the responses of government to unlawful and inappropriate

conduct as inadequate. If the culture in the building and construction industry is to change, as

in my view it must if the productivity benefits from bargaining at the enterprise level are to be

realised, and the freedoms encapsulated in the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) are to be

upheld, there needs to be an independent properly resourced entity which wi ll vigorously

uphold the law. I propose such a body, provisionally entitled the Australian Building and

Construction Commission, in volume 11 - Reform- Achieving Cultural Change.

The future

138 The industry in the future need not be like the industry of the past or the present. However, if

there is to be change in the culture of the industry so that lawlessness is quashed, individual

righ ts are respected, and the great productivity potential which the industry has is to be

unlocked, there will need to be a long term and steely determination on the part of government

to effect change . There will also need to be some leadership shown from within the industry.

139 Government will need to clarify the industrial relations law affecting the industry so that its

participants are fully aware of their obligations, responsibilities and rights . There must be a

strong, well-funded independent entity charged with ensuring that obligations and

responsibilities are enforced, and rights upheld. There wil l need to be an understanding th at

those who, by unlawful conduct, cause loss to others will be the subject of penalties for so

doing, and will be held accountable to compensate for that loss. To achieve th is, there must be

a quick and simple method of attribution of liability to those causing loss, and speedy

mechanisms for its recovery.

140 If the rights of individual employees are to be respected , there will need to be the introduction

of industrial democracy in the workplace. Employees and their employers will need to be given

the opportunity to accommodate their respective interests and wishes by flexible agreements

made at the workplace level. Only in this way can the wishes and aspirations of individual

workers be accommodated, and the improvements in productivity yield ing mutual benefits to

employees and employers unlocked. As the study by Tasman Economics demonstrates, the

benefits to the Australian economy are significant indeed.

National Perspective Part 1 4 I

141 However, establishing frameworks within which the industry can operate more efficiently, more

fairly and more productively, and in which the rights of individuals are respected and enforced,

will not in itself be enough.

142 Leadership will be requ ired from within the business community operating in the industry to

realise the newly available benefits. While th e recommendations proposed in this report will, if

adopted, remove any excuse which business may have for surrendering to unlawful industrial

action and allowing loss caused in consequence to go unrecovered, there remains the

necessity for business leaders at the head contractor and subcontractor level to resolve to

change the culture within the industry and to require adherence to industrial and civil laws at all

levels within the industry. There will need to be a readjustment of the short term project driven

profitability focus, and an acknowledgement that the achieving of long term productivity gains

will flow from the introduction of flexibility. There will need to be a determination both as

individuals and as a group, that it is both right, and in their commercial interests, that the law be

upheld. To achieve cultural change explicit and frank arrangements must be made in the

workplace, 'cheque book industrial relations' must be abolished, and agreements once made

must be adhered to and enforced . The industry should each three years or at some agreed

period, revisit its operations and profitability and fairly distribute the productivity gains which will

flow if the reforms proposed are adopted and the culture in the industry changes. Thereafter,

with agreements made, the industry should settle for a further three years undisturbed by

industrial action and with the flexibility to attract further investment and profitability.

143 The archaic notion that industrial relations in the industry are to be determined by a battle

between monetary might and the industrial capacity to cause great damage must be replaced

by an approach by all participants in the industry that a co-operative approach to industrial

relations practices and conduct can yield great benefit to all participants.

144 The role of unions must be respected. Those who wish to join unions must be entitled to do so

without restriction. Within the limits of industrial democracy at the workplace level, unions must be entitled to rep resent their members who seek their assistance. They must act within the law,

and be held responsible if they do not. They will need to recognise that agreements once made

must be adhered to, and that orders of tribunals and courts must be respected, acknowledged

and implemented.

145 The problems which presently face the industry, and the lawlessness within it, are deep seated

and of long standing. This has occurred because neither governments nor contractors have

had the will to stamp out lawlessness. There has been no strong entity to monitor conduct and

practices, and enforce the law.

146 The workplace practices to be established by enterprise bargaining at the workplace level

should remain unregulated. That will allow the wishes of employees and the businesses by which they are employed to each be accommodated to the greatest extent possible. It should

produce the flexibi lity to allow enterprises and productivity to grow.

14 7 However, the conduct within the industry both affecting the making of agreements and

industrial behaviour thereafter, does need supervision by a body capable of ensuring that

proper standards of behaviour and practices are met and that the agreements, once made, are

adhered to. That should be the task of the Australian Building and Construction Commission.

42 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Notes to A National Perspective

Some instances of the types of conduct set out below, drawn from the case studies in the Hearings Volumes (Volumes 13-21 ), are provided.

Eastlands Cinema Project case study (Tas).

Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (ACT).

Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (ACT) .

A J Bignell Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Eastlands Cinema Project case study (Tas); Hobart Private Hospital Redevelopment Project case study (Tas) .

The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old}.

Lavarack Barracks case study (Old).

PaneiCraft Coolrooms (NSW) Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Neale Jones Civil Contracting Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

A J Bignell Ply Ltd case study (NSW).

10

National Gallery of Victoria case study (Vic); Townsville case study (Ol d}; No 1 The Esplanade, Glenelg case

study (SA); Timbercraft Pty Ltd case study (SA). 11 Peri Australia Pty Ltd case study (Old); Advanced Electrical Pty Ltd case study (Tas) .

12

Matthews Contracting Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Klesteel Pty Ltd trading as Bassett Demolitions case study (NSW).

13

J K Williams Contracting Ply Ltd case study (NSW); PaneiCraft Coolrooms (NSW) Ply Ltd case study (NSW); Lockrey Holdings Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

14

Mobile crane dispute 1997-1998 case study (NSW) .

15

Bosform Pty Ltd case study (Old}. 16 Many pattern EBAs provide for the payment of such an allowance, ·with no corresponding increase in

productivity. Some examples taken from the case studies are: Ace Contractors Pty Ltd case study (NSW);

Masonry Contractors Association- Nevada Contractors Pty Ltd case study (NSW) . 17 Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd case study (Old}; Barclay Mowlem Construction Limited case study (Old);

Watpac Australia Ply Ltd case study (Old}; MarGra Pty Ltd case study (Old); Royal Hobart Hospital Stage 2

Development case study (Tas) . 18 No. 1 The Esplanade, Glenelg case study (SA).

19

Peri Australia Pty Ltd case study (Old).

20

Neale Jones Civil Contracting Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 21 Bovis Lend Lease Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 22

Grocon Limited case study (Vic). 23 Monarch Group Pty Ltd case study (Vic). 24

Ingleside Bricklaying case study (NSW); Christies People Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Labour Hire in

Queensland case study (Old). 25 Alkene Asbestos Removal Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 26

Gillespie's Cranes Nominees Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Bitz Excavations Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 27 Jim Morrissey Bricklaying Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Jim Godfrey Earthmoving Pty Ltd case study (NSW);

Grindley Construction case study (NSW) . 28 Betaform Constructions Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 29

Jim Morrissey Bricklaying Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 30 Worsley Expansion Project case study 0/VA). 31

The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old}; Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (ACT).

National Perspective Part 1 43

32 Network Project Developments Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 33 Neale Jones Civil Contracting Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Bitz Excavations Ply Ltd case study (NSW).

34 ln gles_ide Bric klaying case study (NSW) .

35 Neale Jones Civil Contracting Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Alkene Asbestos Removal Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

36 Fineline Painting Pty Ltd case study (N SW); Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (ACT). 37 Abigroup case study (Old) ; Townsvi lle case study (Old ); Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (ACT) .

38 MarGra Pty Ltd case study (Old). 39 Cranes case study (Vic) ; Bosform Pty Ltd case study (O ld) ; John Holland case study (Old). 4 ° Florea! Forum case study (WA); The Western Australian Cricket Association Demolition Project case study

(WA).

41

Doric Group Holdings case study Pty Ltd (WA) .

42

Florea! Forum case study (WA); 240 StGeorge's Terrace Perth case study (WA) .

43 240 St George's Terrace Perth case study (WA). 44 Woodman Point Wastewater Treatment Plant case study (WA) .

45

Everwilling Cranes & Platforms Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Jim Godfrey Earthmoving Pty Ltd case study

(NSW).

46 Wilson Mobile Cranes Pty Ltd case study (NSW) . 47 CFMEU Subcontractor Audits case study (Vic); Royal Hobart Hospital Stage 2 Redevelopment case study (Tas) .

48

National Gallery of Victoria case study (Vic); Barclay Mowlem Pty Ltd case study (Old); The Sun Metals

Dispute case study (Old); Chadwick Construction Technology Pty Ltd case study (SA) . 49 Payments to the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (WA). 50 Ideal Interior Linings Pty Ltd case study (Old). 51

CFMEU Subcontractor Audits case study (Vic) .

52 Zlatar Partitions Pty Ltd case study (N SW); Anzac Day case study (Vic); CFMEU Subcontractor Audits case study (Vic); Cranes case study (Vic); Fastform Systems Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Grocon Limited case study (Vic); Herscheii -Stent Pty Ltd case study (Vic); lntreepit Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Kessaris and Dawson case

study (Vic); Monarch Group Pty Ltd case study (Vic); National Gal lery of Victoria case study (Vic); Sa1zeriya case study (Vic) ; Shaun Hughes case study (Vic); The Age Print Centre case study (Vic); The Federation

Square case study (Vic); The Victorian State Hockey and Netball Centre case study (Vic); Walter

Constructi on Group Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Westfield Design and Construction Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Woolworths case study (Vic) .

53

Betaform Constructions Ply Ltd case study (NSW); Bovis Lend Lease Australia Pty Ltd case study (NSW) ;

Anzac Day case study (Vic); Fastform Systems Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Herscheii-Stent Pty Ltd case study

(Vic); lntreepit Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Kessaris and Dawson case study (Vic); National Gallery of V1ctoria

case study (Vic); Nu -Line Aluminium Windows case study (Vic); Saizeriya case study (Vic) ; Shaun Hughes

case study (Vic); Wal ter Construction Group Pty Ltd case study (Vic); Westfield Design and Construction Pty

Ltd (Vic); Woolworths case study (Vic). 54 Betaform Constructions Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Union Matters case study (NSW); Shaun Hughes case

study (Vic); Donations to the Guide Dogs Association case study {Old) . 55 Payments to the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union case study (WA). 56

Payments to the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union case study (WA). 57 Crestway Constructions Ply Ltd case study (NSW) ; Walter Construction Group Pty Ltd case study (Vic). 58

The Events of 21 April 1998 in Townsville case study (Old). 59 Norske Skog Boyer Paper Mill case study (Tas) .

44 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

60 Townsvil le case study (Old); The Woolstore Apartments Redevelopment Project case study (Tas).

61 Salmon & Son Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

62 PaneiCraft Coolrooms (NSW) Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Saxona Pty Ltd trading as Campbelltown

Cool rooms case study (N SW); Mirvac Constructions Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Cranes case study (Vic);

Shaun Hughes case study (Vic) ; The Age Pnnt Centre case study (Vic); National Gallery of Victoria case

study (Vic); The Victorian State Netball and Hockey Centre case study (Vic); Homezone Home and Garden

Centre case study (Old).

63 Watpac Australia Pty Ltd case study (Old). 64 Hackett Laboratory Services Pty Ltd case study (NSW) . 65 Dependable Roofing Scissor Lift Incident case study (WA). 66 Salmon & Son Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Bovis Lend Lease Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Anzac Day case

study (Vic); Cranes case study (Vic) ; Fastform Systems Pty Ltd case study (Vic); The Age Print Centre case

study (Vic); Th e Victori an State Netball and Hockey Centre case study (Vic); Woolworths case study (Vic);

Abigroup case study (Old); Lavarack Barracks case study (Old); Watpac Australia Pty Ltd case study (Old) ;

The Sun Metals dispute case study (Old); The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old) .

67 Lavarack Barracks case study (Old). 68 New Era Balustrading Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Blue Circle Southern Cement Ltd case study (NSW); Geelong Code of Practice case study (Vic); Nu-Line Aluminium Windows Pty Ltd case study (Vic); The Age

Print Centre case study (Vic); Woolworths case study (Vic); Westfield Design and Construction Pty Ltd case

study (Vic); Walter Construction Group case study (Vic); Homezone Home and Garden Centre case study (Old); Joe Battaglia case study (Old); Farl ey Concreting Pty Ltd case study (Old); Labour Hire case study

(Old); John Holland case study (Old); MarGra Pty Ltd case study (Old); Multiplex Constructions (Old) Pty Ltd

case study (Old); Peri Australia Pty Ltd case study (Old); Townsville case study (Old); Casuarina Shopping

Centre case study (NT).

69

Westfield Carousel Shopping Centre case study (WA).

70 The Events of 21 April 1998 in Townsville case study (Old). 71 Westfield Carousel Shopping Centre case study (WA) .

72

OH&S case study (Tas).

73

Bitz Excavations Pty Ltd case study (NSW); The Age Print Centre case study (Vic) .

7 ' Alkene Asbestos Removal Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

75

The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old) .

76 Ingleside Bricklaying case study (NSW); Grindley Construction Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 77 Betaform Constructions Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

78 Sebastian Builders & Developers Pty Ltd case study (NSW); Citylink case study (Vic); Tiwi Campus case study (NT); Mitchell Street case study (NT).

79

Mobile Crane Dispute 1997 - 1998 case study (NSW) .

80 The Age Print Centre case study (Vic); The Victorian State Netball and Hockey Centre case study (Vic). 81 Leightons Contractors Pty Ltd case study (Old).

82

The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old).

83

The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old) .

84

The Nambour Hospital Dispute case study (Old).

85 National Gallery of Victoria case study (Vic); Holland Estate case study (Vic); LaTrobe Regional Hospital Demolition Project case study (Vic) . 86 Port Melbourne Flats case study (Vic). 87

Saizeriya case study (Vic).

National Perspective Part 1 45

88 Saizeriya case study (Vic) .

89 Australian Industry Group v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union of Australia [2001 ] FCA 77 4, 22 June 2001, at 19.

90 Video containing footage of the Sun Metals Dispute, Exhibit 1 040. 91 Deed between the New South Wales Government and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Bui lding Un ions Divisional Branch and the Building Workers Industrial Union of Austra lia, New South Wales

Branch, dated 16 March 1994, exhibit 568, document 002 0467.0323 0002 at 0003.

92 A copy of the Code of Conduct is annexed to the Deed . See exhibit 568, document 002.0467.0323.0002 at 0014.

93 Exhi bit 596, document 050.0996.01 68.0015. 94 Exhibit 596, document 050.0996.0168.0016. 95 Multiplex Constructi ons (NSW) Pty Ltd case study (NSW) . 96 Hackett Laboratory Services Pty Ltd case study (NSW) . 97

Zadro Constructions Pty Ltd case study (NSW).

98 Christies People Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 99 Focus Pro perty Servi ces Pty Ltd case study (NSW) . 100 Ingleside Bricklaying case study (NSW).

101

Bovis Lend Lease Pty Ltd case study (NSW). 102 Grindley Construction Pty Ltd case study (N SW)/ 1

03 Kessaris and Dawson case study (Vic).

104 Exhibit 702, document 022 0236.0375.0001.

105 Sutton , T9064/13-25.

106 The Events of 21 April1998 in Townsville case study (Old). 107 Labour Hi re in Queensland case study (Old). 108

Labour Hire in Queensland case study (Old). 10 9 McDonald, T 4119/35-4120/ 3.

110 McDonald, T4121/ 19-27. 111 McDonald , T 4122/30-35. 112

McDonald , T4356/3-7. 113 McDonald, T 4356/ 16-20. 114

McDonald, T4358/41 -42. 115 McDonald , T4357/3-13. 116

Su preme Court File, exhibit 851, document 017.0052.0191 .0203 at 0217; Zaknich v McDonald [2000]

WASC 151 per Scott J at paragraph 50. 117 McDonald, T5334/9-1 0. 118

McDonald, T5334/3-5. 11 9 McDonald, T4097/31-44.

120 Doric Group Holdings Pty Ltd case study 0/VA). 121 Pattern Agreements to which the CEPU is a Party case study (Tas). 122

Eastlands Cinema Project case study (Tas). 123 Pattern Agreements to w hich the CFMEU is a Party case study (Tas). 124

Exhibit 1341, parag raph 148-155.

46 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

125 Grocon Pty Ltd Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry dated 22 July 2002, exhibit 830, page 26-27 and 30, document 048.0949.0311.0094.

126 Response by Phillips Fox on behalf of Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd dated 20 December 2002 , to Submissions of Counsel Assisting the Royal Commission on whether the Queensland Construction Sector Statement of Intent breaches the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth), dated 9 December 2002, page 3-4. 127

Bickerdike Statement, exhibit 399, paragraphs 15.1 - 15.5, document 068.0269.0210.0016. 128 Multiplex Construction (Old) Pty Ltd Submission to the Royal Commissio n into the Building and Construction Industry dated 11 April 2002, exhibit 400, page 12, document 068.0269.0210.0003. 129

Pattern Agreements to which the CFMEU is a Party case study (Tas).

130 Response by Mr Jessup QC and Mr Santamaria on behalf of Baulderstone Pty Ltd dated 23 April 2002, to the Submissions of Counsel Assisting the Commission regard ing the National Gallery of Victoria Redevelopment Project- Phase 3 dated 5 April 2002, paragraphs 6-7. 131

Boyd, B, (199 1) Inside the BLF: A Union Self-destructs, page 234 , cited in a History of Recent Industrial Relations Even ts in the Building and Construction Industry, Discussion Paper 7, Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry.

132 McDonald, T and A, (1998) Intimate Union. Sharing a Revolutionary Life, Pluto Press, page 315, cited in a History of Recent Industrial Relations Events in the Building and Construction Industry, Discussion Paper 7, Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. 133

McDonald, T and A, (1998) Intimate Union: Sharing a Revolutionary Life , Pluto Press, page 320, cited in a History of Recent Industrial Relations Events in the Building and Construction Industry, Discussion Paper 7, Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. 134

Submission by the Tasmanian Government to the Bui lding and Construction Industry Royal Commission

dated 21 February 2002, exhibit 179, document 016.0409 0260.0001. 135 Rockhampton case study (Old). 136 Schwarten Statement, exhibit 1009, paragraph 15, document 019.0139.0154.0001. 137

Mclean Statement, exhibit 315, paragraph 95, document 016.0873.0470.0001. 13 8 Lavarack Barracks case study (Old).

National Perspective Part 1 4 7

48 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

2 Structure of the Industry

Introduction

The building and construction industry is critical to welfare and prosperity in Australia. In 2001 -02

it directly accounted for 5.5 per cent of Australia 's gross domestic product1 and 7.5 per cent of

employment. 2 Indirectly, it has a much greater impact. CSIRO Built Environment noted that:

The Built Environment is the nation's largest asset. It is where all Australians live, where

95% work and where over 90% of the nation's GOP is generated. The technologies available for its design, planning, construction and operation are fundamental to the

productivity and competitiveness of the economy, the quality of life of our citizens and the ecological sustainability of the continent. 3

2 Similarly, the National Building and Construction (Nat BACC) 4 argued that:

The building and construction industry is a vital element of the Australian economy and

has a significant impact on the efficiency and productivity of other industries. Its outputs

are critical for all of us whether it be via the provision of physical infrastructure that

underpins the economy or through the built environment which more directly influences

the quality of our lives. 5

3 The importance of an efficient building and construction industry is obvious in the development

of infrastructure facilities , such as electricity grids, gas pipelines, telecommunication networks,

ports, roads and railways . Usually, the cost of building these facilities is large compared with the

ongoing cost of operation. This makes the cost of construction even more critical for these

important services. For example, the price of electricity has a signi fi cant effect on nearly every

individual and business in Australia. The cost of constructing electricity infrastructure has a

significant impact on that price. Similarly, the cost of constructing transport facilities such as

ports, roads and railways will affect Australians generally and particularly those looking to

export their products overseas. Again, it is clear that the cost of building office blocks, shops

and factories is relevant to nearly all Australian businesses.

4 These observations are reinforced by the work of this Commission. It investigated many major

projects with significant levels of investment in key sectors of Australia's economy. As shown in

box 1 , building and construction projects involve millions of dollars across all States and

Territories and affect many sectors of the economy.

National Perspective Part 1 49

Box 1 Examples of major projects

Sydney Olympics 2000 Main Stadium ($463 million)

Stadium Australia was the largest, most technologically advanced stadium ever built. 6

The Stadium has a seating capacity of 11 0 000, an international Olympic standard track

and hig h quality lighting for te levision coverage . There were numerous major building

projects associated with its construction. Construction ran from August 1996 until March 1999.7

MS East Motorway ($750 million)

This New South Wales Government project made a substantial contribution to Sydney's

road infrastructure. It involved building a ten kilometre expressway, and construction

began in December 1998. Tunnels were built under Arncliffe and Bardwell Park and

much of the existing two-lane carriageway was duplicated .8

Tallawarra Power Station ($250 million)

Located in New South Wales, this government project required the construction of a

new 400 megawatt combined cycle gas fired turbine power plant and related facilities .

The site area is 600 hectares, and the project began in October 1999.9

Docklands - Victoria Harbour Precinct ($1500 million)

This 1 0 year development, located in the Docklands area of Melbourne, has a site area

of 30.2 hectares. Construction will include 2100 residential apartments, 160 000 square

metres of office space, 20 000 square metres of retail, restaurants and cafes, 15 000

sq uare metres of community facilities and 6.6 hectares of public space.w

UQ and CSIRO Joint Building Project St Lucia ($100 million)

This federally funded project is on the site of the former CSIRO Cunningham Laboratory

in Queensland. It will include University of Queensland 's Institute of Molecular

Bioscience, CSIRO Tropical Agriculture and other divisions, Australian Genome

Research Facility, Queensland Agriculture Biotechnology Centre and Wesley Research

Institute. Construction began in December 2000 and the facility will house 850 staff. 11

Australian Glass Manufacturers Company ($65 million)

Located in South Australia, the project comprised construction of a new glass furnace

and upgrade to a bottle manufacturing and packaging plant. The project ran from August 1999 to November 1999.12

50 Final Report of the Royal Commission into tile Building and Construction Industry

Narrows Bridge ($42 million)

The Narrows Bridge in South Perth was widened to accommodate two dedicated bus

lanes, additional traffic lanes and a dual use path across the Swan River. The project ran

from June 1999 to November 2000 and was part of the State Government's $1.3 billion Transform WA Transport Package. 13

The Australian Trucking Association ($30 million)

Located in the ACT, this building includes a new four-storey office building with two

levels of basement parking and plant room on the roof. The project was to run from July 2001 until September 2002. 14

Benefits from improving productivity

5 There are clear benefits from improving the productivity of bu ilding and construction. The

Commission engaged Tasman Economics to estimate the impact on the Australian economy of

improving productivity in the building and construction industry.15 A full copy of the Tasman

report is included at annexure 1 in Volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of thi s report. That

work found that since high levels of productivity growth in the mid-1970's, the rate of growth in

productivity in bu ilding and construction has been considerably less than the national average for the market sector.

6 In its first scenario Tasman modelled the benefits of increasing the rate of productivity growth in

building and construction to match the average for the market sector over the last five years. It

estimated that between 2003 and 2010 the accumulated gain in real gross domestic product

would be about $12 billion. All industries would benefit from an increase in output as a result of

the reduction in the cost of building and construction . In 2010 five industries - transport,

equipment n.e.c. 16 , motor vehicles and parts, electronic equipment, metals n.e.c. and ferrous

metals - were projected to have output more than two per cent higher than if the current rates

of productivity growth in the buil ding and construction industry were maintained. Building and

construction industry output was estimated to expand by one per cent. Exports were predicted

to grow by 1.6 per cent and imports to decline by 0.2 per cent.

7 Th e second scenario illustrated the benefits from wage rises accompanied by productivity

gains. A productivity increase of 7.6 per cent would be required to maintain the building and

construction industry's competitiveness if average wages for the entire industry increased by

12 per cent over the three year period 2003 to 2005. The results carry clear benefits for all

groups. Th e estimates suggest that from 2003 to 201 0:

• workers benefit from the 12 per cent pay rise;

• the building industry benefits from output growth of about 0.6 per cent;

• Australia benefits from an accumulated increase in real gross domestic product of about

$11.5 billion;

National Perspective Part 1 51

• exports would grow and imports fa ll ; and

• the output of all industries would grow with particular benefits to manufacturing and

processing industries like motor vehicles and parts, transport eq uipment and metals. 17

8 Dr Peter Crowley, who reviewed the Tasman work, made the following comments.

The results of the analysis confirm the direct and indirect economic importance of the

building and construction sector. An 1ncrease in labour productivity has a substantial and

beneficial impact on the international competitiveness of, and incentives to invest in,

most sectors of the economy The effect is most pronounced in the more capital­ intensive sectors, as would be expected given the high content of building and

construction in capital expenditure. An increase in labour costs, without a commensurate

increase in productivity, raises capital costs and therefore reduces future investment in Australia relative to the rest of the world. 18

A national focus

9 I have considered many individual case stu dies from all States and Territories, drawn from

those sectors of the industry under the Terms of Reference. Those case studies revealed an

industry in which the rule of law has been eroded. Its erosion has been accompanied by an

uneasy all iance between major contractors and unions. That alliance is based on a mixture of

self interest and commercial pragmatism .

1 0 There is no one characteristic that sets the building and construction industry apart from all

other industries. Building and construction is project based with projects varying from short to

long term. This is true of the information technology industry. Building and construction workers

move between employers relatively frequently. The same can be said for hospitality workers.

The large number of small contractors in bui lding and construction is a characteristic of the

agricu ltural industry. The work is dangerous, as is work in mining and much of manufacturing.

Together, however, ail these and other characteristics do distinguish building and construction

from other industries.

11 The work is project based. Each 'product' is constructed in a different location under different

circumstances. The 'product' is discrete in nature, location, time and cost. While the processes

used in bu ilding or construction may be repetitive in concept each production process is un ique.

12 As the work is project based the workforce on the site is not constant throughout the project.

Each project involves differen t workers with differi ng skills for differing but overlapping periods

of time . Trades intermesh with and are dependent on the preceding trade.

13 This work structu re requires flexibility in work arrangements. Businesses are looking for

alternative ways of managing the workforce. In the building and construction industry, the

largest companies employ very few tradespeople on site. They rely on contractors that have a

small number of employees or persons who work as individual subcontractors .

14 Continuity of employment is, in the main, not assured and usually depends on the success of

ve ry small businesses operating in a highly competitive environment. Workers face uncertainty

about the avai labi lity of future work.

52 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

15 The head contractor of the project has no direct relationship with most of the workers on the

proJect. Nevertheless the head contractor requires workers to work in sequence, in

co-operation and in close proximity to others who have different employers with no prior or

continuing association. This increases the risk of accidents. The head contractor thus has no

direct control flowing from an employment relationship with those building the project.

16 The mobilisation and co-ordination of labour, plant and materials is an organisational task of

great complexity. That task continues throughout the whole building project. Disruption can

impose large costs on the parties involved. As a result building and construction is frequently a risky industry. Plant, capital and labour are mobile and the cost of disruptions is high .

17 Overall, this has resulted in the following key characteristics:

(a) clients only select head contractors with a reputation for delivering on time and on

budget;

(b) head contractors are responsible for most of the project based risk , including industrial

relations risk;

(c) head contractors have a short term, project based focus on profitability and

performance;

(d) subcontractors are dependent on head contractors for continuity of work ;

(e) while having specialist trade skills subcontractors often lack broader business

management skills;

(0 the level of bargaining power of subcontractors, who employ the bulk of the workforce, is

limited;

(g) head contractors dictate terms and conditions they have agreed with the unions and if

favourable terms and conditions are secured on one site the unions quickly incorporate

these benefits in they demands on other sites;

(h) the level of unionisation is high on major projects;

(i) workers feel insecure about their prospects for long term employment and the safety of

their workplace; and

U) the cost of industrial unrest is high, so industrial action or the threat of it is highly effective

in securing demands.

18 Such an environment can lead to an industry where all participants seek short term commercial

expediency at the expense of the industry's long term performance.

Si ze and scope of the industry

1 9 Building and construction is a large and diverse industry. Projects are located across the

country in urban, rural and remote areas. The building and construction in dustry, as defined by

my Terms of Reference, encompasses:

(a) multi-unit and high rise residential developments;

National Perspective Part 1 53

(b) non-residential buildings, such as office blocks, shopping centres , retail premises,

ed ucational institutions, and hospitals; and

(c)- engineering construction work.

20 The Terms of Reference exclude the building of si ngle dwelling houses unless they are part of a

multi-dwelling complex.

21 Total building and construction industry activity in Au stralia was valued at $59 682 million in

200 1-02. This includ ed site preparation, but not land cost and landscaping . The Commission

has estimated the value of bui lding and construction activity covered by the Terms of

Reference. 19 In total, about 68 per cent of the total activity in the bui lding and construction

in dustry was covered by my Terms of Reference (chart 1 ). This equated to $40 71 1 million. The

estimates for each State and Territory are presented in chart 2 and table 1.

22 The States with the largest building and construction ind ustry were New South Wales (35 per

cent of the national total), Victoria (23 per cent) and Queensland (22 per cent). Togethe r, th ese

three accounted for over 80 per cent of the building and construction activity covered by my Terms of Reference (chart 2).

Chart 1

Value of work done in the building and construction industry covered by the

Commission's Terms of Reference, 2001-02 ($ 'million)

Engineering construction 20085

Alterations and additions to other residential building 706

Total non-residential building 13168

Source: ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8752.0) and ABS 2002

(Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no_ 8762.0)

54 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 2

Val ue of work done in the building and construction industry in each State and

Territory covered by the Commission's Terms of Reference, 2001-02 ($'million)

SA 2421

Source: ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8752.0) and ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8762.0)

Ta ble 1

Value of work done by industry sector under the Commission's Terms of Reference

fo r each State and Territory, 2001-02 ($'million)

Industry NSW Vic Old SA WA Tas NT ACT

New other 3037.4 1786.5 1150.4 193.9 394.2 12.8 50.0 127.3

residential

bu ilding

Alterations and 257 .1 247.0 91.3 33.0 48.7 11.0 3.9 13.5

additions to

other residential

building

Total non- 4353.2 3963.3 2400.1 774.4 1038.3 168.5 183.8 286.1

residential

building

Engineering 5601.9 3390.3 4631.9 141 9.4 3149.2 461.7 1230.7 199.9 construction

Total 13249.6 9387.1 8273.7 2420.7 4630.4 654.0 1468.4 626.8

Source : ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Au stral ia, Cat. no. 8752 .0) and ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no . 8762.0)

Total

6752.5

705 .6

13167.7

20084.9

40710.7

Na tional Perspective Part 1 55

23 Of the three main sectors of building and construction covered by my Terms of Reference, the

largest is engineering construction, which, in 2001-02, accounted for 49 per cent of the activity

under review by the Commission. Engineering construction refers to bui lding infrastructure

faci lities such as roads , railways, ports, pipelines and water storage and supply. It inclu des

recreatio nal facilities such as golf cou rs es, swimming pools, parks and stadiums, the

construction of production, storage and distribution faci lities for oil , gas, coal and other

minerals , and other heavy industry construction such as chemical plants, blast furnaces, steel

mills, ovens and industrial processing plants.

24 In the engineering constru ction sector, roads , high ways and subdivisions accounted for 26 per

cent of the value of work done in 2001 -02 . Electricity generation, transmission and distribu ti on

and pipelines made up a further 18 per cent and 18 per cent was attributed to heavy industry.

Telecommunications infrastructure comprised 17 per cent of engineering construction activity

across Australia. Togeth er, these fou r sectors accounted for nearly 80 per cent of th e total

value of engineering construction activity (chart 3) .

25 The proportion of engineering construction activity during 2001 -02 in the Northern Territory,

Tasmania and Western Australia was unusually hi gh, accounting for 84, 71 and 68 per cent of

building and construction activity in these jurisdictions respectively. This was due to major

heavy industry projects in the Northern Territory and Western Australia and , in the case of

Tasman ia, construction for electricity transmission infrastructure.

Chart 3

Value of engineering construction work done, 2001-02 ($ 'million)

Telecommunications 3473

Recreation and other 1389

Water storage and supply, sewerage and drainage 1330

Roads, highways and subdivisions 5199

Bridges, railways and harbours 1513

Electricity generation, transmission etc. and pipelines 3676

Source: ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002 : Australia, Cat. no. 8762.0)

56 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

26 The second largest area of build ing and construction activity is non-residential building. In

2001 -02 it accounted for 32 per cent of the activity under review by th e Commission. The

areas with the highest levels of activity were shops (20 per cent of non-residential bui lding

activity), offices (18 per cent) and educational facilities (14 per cent). Together, these three

sectors made up about half of the value of non-residential bu ilding activity (chart 4).

27 Both Victoria and the ACT were heavi ly re liant on non-residential bu ilding activity.

Chart 4

Value of non-residential building work done, 2001-02 ($'million)

Entertainment and recreational 900

Health 1354

Religious 132

Educational 2032

Other business premises 1650

Hotels etc 478

Offices 2673

Factories 791

Source: ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Austral ia, Cat. no. 8752.0)

28 The third of the main sectors covered by my Terms of Reference, other residential bui ldin g,

includes the construction of, and alterations and additions to, blocks of flats , home units,

attached townhouses and terrace houses. In 2001-02 this sector accounted for 18 per cent of the activity under my Te rms of Reference.

Growth in building and construction

29 The level of bu ild ing and construction activity is cyclical. It declines when economic activity is

low and rises when the rest of the economy is growing quickly .

. . . the industry is more exposed than many others to cyclical economic factors, both local

and national .. . 20

30 Chart 5 illustrates the volatility in the industry from I 97 4-75 to 2001 -02. This chart uses the

original chain volume measure of the val ue of building work done. Thi s measure adj usts the

figures to take out the effects of price changes over time and , therefore, it is the best way of comparing how vo lumes of production have changed. Because of the way the chai n volume

National Perspective Part 1 57

measures are calculated they cannot be used to estimate changes in the total level of activity

under the Term s of Reference. Instead , chart 5 presents separate information on the key

industry sectors.

Chart 5

Value of building work done, original chain volume measures ($ 'million)

50000 -- New other residential building Total building

39078

40000 r------------------------------------------------------------·-----

Non-residential building Engineering construction

30000

20000

10000

0

24425

19736

13097

10717

- 6719 U') m m m m m m m 9 co c\, .;, "' .;, Jo ,_:, cb 0, 6 o; c\, .;, "' .;, Jo ,_:, cb 0, 6 0 co co co co co co co co m m m m m m m m m 8 0 N N Source: ABS 2002 (Bui lding Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. nos. 8752.0 & 8762.0 table 1A time series quarterly data) Notes: Data collection on engineering construction began in 1986-87. Reference year for chain volume measures is 2000-01 . 31 The trend has been for building and construction activity to grow over time, although there are sharp increases and decreases from year to year. For example, there was an 11 per cent decrease in building and construction activity under my Terms of Reference between 1999-2000 and 2000-01 . Thi s has been partially off set by a 10 per cent increase in 2001-02. 32 The Australian Procurement and Construction Council had predicted that the industry would recover somewhat in 2002, followed by another decline in 2003 and then steady growth from 2004 to 2010. In its analysis, the Council noted that: Although the industry is cyclic the underlying trend is one of growth. The low point of the current cycle ($59.5 billion in 2001) is $13.3 billion higher than the low point of the previous cycle ($46.2 billion in 1992) and $17.8 billion higher than the low point of the cycle before that ($41.7 billion in 1983 and 1984). The low point in 2002 is also higher than total expenditure in any year before 1998. 21 58 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Firms in the industry

33 The diversity in the building and construction industry makes it difficult to accurately generalise

about the characteristics of a typical business. It is still possible to draw some insights from the

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Construction Industry Surveys. The fourth and most

recent survey was for 1996-97. All four surveys found the construction industry was comprised

mostly of small firms with fewer than 20 employees. They contributed most of the industry's

output and accounted for 99 per cent of the total number of enterprises. Very small firms in the

construction industry, employing fewer than five people, accounted for 94 per cent of all

businesses in the industry in 1996-97, and over two-thirds of all employees. In contrast, less

than one per cent of businesses employed 20 or more people.

34 The number of small businesses in the building and construction industry appears to be

increasing and the number of large businesses falling (table 2). As the ABS made changes to its

survey for the 1996-97 collection, the numbers in table 2 are indicative only and do not provide

conclusive evidence of this change.

Table 2

Private sector construction establishments: number operating ('000)

Number of Employees 1984-85 1988-89 1996-97

Less than 5 91.6 82.5 182.0

Between 5 and 19 7.9 11.9 11 .1

20 or more 1.3 2.3 1.2

Total 100.8 96.6 194.3

Source : ABS 1999, 1991, and 1987 (1996-97 , 1988-89 and 1984-85, Private Sector Construction Industry; Australia, Cat. No. 8772.0)

35 Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) research under the National Skills Initiative stated that:

Many of the smaller businesses are family run (often a husband and wife partnership

whether incorporated or not), through which the husband carries out his particular

trade. 22

36 Table 3 further illustrates the current domination of the industry by small businesses. Those

employing less than fi ve people have 69 per cent of the workforce who earn 39 per cent of

wages and salaries. They account for nearly half of the building and construction industry's

turnover and generate 7 4 per cent of profits.

37 Less than one per cent of businesses employ more than 20 people. They employ 14 per cent

of the workforce who earn 32 per cent of wages and salaries. They are responsible for 28 per

cent of turnover and 14 per cent of profit. Despite the number of small firms, the large firms in

the industry clearly play a significant role. These firms contribute a disproportionate share of

income, turnover and profit.

National Perspective Part 1 59

Table 3

Size and characteristics of building and construction firms, 1996-97

Selected indicators Employment: Employment: Employment:

less than 5 5 to 19 20 or more

(per cent) (per cent) (per cent)

Operating businesses 93.7 5.7 0.6

Employment 68.6 17.7 13.6

Wages and salaries 39.4 28.2 32.4

Turnover 48.3 23.7 28.0

Total income 48.1 23.6 28.3

Total operating expenses 45.2 24.9 29.9

Operating profit 74.4 11 .3 14.3

Industry gross product 53.5 22.1 24.4

Source: ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97 Australia, Cat. No. 8772 .0)

38 Most of the largest contractors {those with an annual turnover in excess of $200 million) belong

to the Australian Constructors Association (ACA). The ACA website notes that 'ACA member

companies have a combined annual revenue in excess of $A 15b and collectively employ over

49,000 people in their Australian and international operations' 23 The 2002 Annual Report

stated 'Member companies account for around 40% of total construction activity in

Australia'. 24 While the large contractors subcontract much of this work to smaller businesses,

these figures illustrate that large contractors control a substantial part of the industry's output

and cash flow. The shape of the industry structure is that of a flattened pyramid, with a handful

of very large contractors and a few {1200) large contractors (more than 20 employees) at the

top, and many small subcontractors forming the base.

39 The subcontractors follow a similar structure. Within each of the 14 specialist trade areas the

ABS data show there are many small firms and a few large ones. Fo r example, in site

preparation services there are 637 4 firms with fewer than five employees (employing 11 499

people) and 60 firms with more than 20 employees (employing 2934 people). This pattern is

repeated in the other trades 2 5

60 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

40 The average level of profitability in the bu ilding and construction industry is low, particularly in

non-residential bui lding and non-building construction (for example the construction of

infrastructure). The percentage of businesses in the building construction industry that made a

profit was slightly higher than the average for all other industries (chart 6). However, at 4.6 per

cent, the average profit margin in the industry was much less than the national average of

9.3 per cent (chart 7) . This falls to 0.7 per cent for non-residential building construction and

4.3 per cent for non-building construction. It is as high as 16 per cent for other residential

build ing construction and 15.5 per cent for construction trade service 2 6

Chart 6

Business profitability in the building and construction industry 2000-01

80

72.7 • Building and Construction D All industries

70

60

50

40

30

23.3

20

10

0

Made a profit Broke even Made a loss

Source : ABS 2002 (Summary of Industry Performance 2000-2001 , May 2002: Australia, Cat no. 8142 .0.55.002)

Na tional Perspective Part 1 61

Chart 7

Profit margins by industry 2000-01

30

25 22.3 .----

19.6

20 .----

0> .!:! c:

15

"'

13.8

,..----

a.

9

10

,..----

7

6. 3 ,..----

5

- 4.6 4.2 4. 1 5.1

0 I nn lei

(J) (J) A c:

"' "'

UJ UJ (!)

c: c 0. 0 u u

c (J) "' (.) (!) (!) (!) c "§ 0. :;::; _g _g (.) c: (.) (.) (.) :;, :0 u (.) 0 2' 2' 2' 2' t5 1i) "' ::> "' "' (!) ill 1il ro ·rn §-ffi s E "' 0 (.) ·u; E c 0. ·c: (!) ::> E "' E (.) D "' ·u (!) (f E ·.:: 0. t5 e .2 (!) w ()._ 3 u Source: ABS 2002 (Summary of Industry Performance 2000-2001, May 2002: Australia, Cat no. 8142.0.55.002) Structure of the industry 9.3

,..----

"' "' (.) ·.:: 2' 1i) (!) ::> UJ u ill .S L

41 It is possible to look at the structure and characteristics of the bui lding and construction

industry from several different perspecti ves. For example, the Commission has observed

regional differences in the culture of the industry between urban, rural and rem ote area projects.

42 There are differences between sectors of the industry - residential building, non-residential

build ing and engineering construction. For example engineering construction tends to be

characterised by large projects that are more capital intensive than building work generally. The

MBA Inc made the fo llowing comments about the sectors:

In the commercial and industrial construction sector; work is usually performed on both

an independent contractor and/or employee basis. Overall, there is a medium level of

unionisation. It increases to almost 100% on CBD, metropolitan and major regional

projects. The industry is flexible, extremely competitive and accepts very high levels of

commercial risk in return for low rewards compared with other industries.

62 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Build ing and Construction Industry

The size of firms in this sector varies from small through to multinational. The location of

work is mainly urban, although there are also projects undertaken in regional and remote areas ...

The civil and engineering construction sector is structured similarly to the commercial

and industrial construction sector; except that there is less union involvement both in

terms of level of membership and union militancy and thus a significantly lower level of disruption.

Projects typically have very large dollar values and very high mechanisation-to-labour

ratios. This is its fundamental difference from traditional commercial and industrial building.

Employment in this sector tends to be more continuous. It is characterised by a small

group of specialised contractors and subcontractors which engage and transfer their

employees from project to project (so that high mobility is required) until there is no more

work available. 27

43 The Queensland Government observed:

the multi-unit/high rise residential, and non-residential sectors are more likely to have:

• large principal contracting companies;

• many trades brought together on one site;

• higher rates of workers classified as employees [compared with the housing

sector], with most employees employed by sub-contractors and independent

contractors, as opposed to head contractors;

• more coordination and principal contractor presence;

• prominent union presence and high unionisation rates;

• long working hours and regular overtime;

• greater levels of technology and plant; and

• an impact on public safety.

In contrast to the building sector; the civil and engineering sector exhibits the following

unique characteristics:

• head contractors usually directly employ a greater number of employees (up to

65 per cent) than the building sector (approximately 5-10 per cent);

• a greater number of employees are engaged on a permanent basis; and

• a greater degree of industrial stability. ..

However; a trend is emerging where the contractual employment arrangements in the

residential housing sector are increasingly being adopted in the non-residential building

and civil and engineering sectors. 28

National Perspective Part 1 63

44 I agree with these observations.

45 Different types of firms operate within each sector of the industry. The former Department of

Industry Science and Resources' (ISR) paper, Building for Growth: An Analysis of the Australian

Building and Construction lndustries, 29 divided these firms into three key categories:

(a) the supply network- consisting of the traditional construction trades;

(b) the project based firms - consisting of designers, engineers, project managers, builders

and contractors; and

(c) the property sector - which includes firms, individuals and organisations that develop,

commission, own, manage and lease buildings and other infrastructure.

46 To understand the interrelationships between these groups of firms, the ISR paper outlines a

cluster framework. The framework, as shown in chart 8, identifies components of the industry

as:

(a) the reg ulatory framework;

(b) supply networks;

(c) project-based firms;

(d) property sector; and

(e) technical support infrastructure.

47 Each component is linked by information and knowledge flows.

64 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 8

Building and construction industry cluster map

I

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

ACTIVITIES: technical, economic, environmental and social regulation

ACTORS: Commonwealth, State, Territory and Local Government,

Australian Building Codes Board, Standards Australia,

builders licensing authorities, fi rms, industry and professional associations

!

SUPPLY NETWORKS PROJECT BASED PROPERTY SECTOR

ACTIVITIES: Materials, FIRMS ACTIVITIES:

components, equipment ACTIVITIES: Design, Commissioning and

manufacture and engineering, integration, using constru cted

services assembly/construction products and

construction services

ACTORS: ACTORS:

Building materials and Consultants, designers, ACTORS:

product manufacturers, engineers, project Finance sector,

construction trades managers, constructors, real estate,

(electrical, plumbing and specialist contractors build ing owners

carpentry), wholesalers and subcontractors and managers

and retailers

l l

TECHNICAL SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

ACTIVITIES: long term technical development and support

l

A.CTORS: Commonwealth, State, Territory and Local Government, education sector,

research and development institutions, industry and professional associations

The cluster framework utilised in this report is based on a framework developed by the Australian Expert Group in Industry Studies (AEGIS) - a research centre of University of Western Sydney. AEG IS undertook a number of

studies on the building and construction industry on behalf of the Depart ment of Industry, Science and Resources.

Source: Industry Science and Resources 1999, Building for Growth: An analysis of the Austra lian Building and

Construction Industries, p. 10

National Perspective Part 1 65

48 The cluster map model illustrates the complexity of the industry and the way various groups of

firms are interrelated. Factors that affect firms in one group or sector will often flow on to affect

other groups. This shows the importance of industrial harmony on project sites, as any type of

industrial dispute may affect all parti ci pants in the model.

49 In the category Project-Based Firms there is usually an hierarchical relationship between the

various parties to a project (chart 9) .

Chart 9 Stylised representation of project relationships

Client a

I

Consultantsb

Architecture

Engineering

Accounting

Head Contractorb

Contruction Manager

Crane Crew

Cleaners

Safety Officer

Materials Suppliers

Legal

Finance

Subcontractors b Plumbing

Painting

Electrical

Lifts

Excavation

Fire Protection

Concreting

Carpentry

Door Installation

Roofing

Plastering

Formwork

Glazing

Air Conditioning

Suspended Ceilings

Tiling

a A consultant may represent the client when it lacks the technical and organisational expertise to

coordinate a large building project. b The list of occupants and tasks is given as an example and is not intended to be exhaustive.

!

Source: Adapted from Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building

Projects, Labour Market Research Report , Auslnfo, Canberra, p . 14

66 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

50 The hierarchical structure has implications for the way influences on firms at one level in the

chain can flow up or down the chain and affect others. The implications of these

interrelationships between firms are discussed later in this volume.

The building and construction process

51 It is generally agreed that all large building and construction projects have three common

characteristics, reflected in the discussion by the Productivity Commission paper in its report

on Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects30 and the submission presented to this Commission by MBA Inc. These characteristics are:

(a) each project is managed on an individual basis;

(b) each project draws together a wide range of skills; and

(c) the specific skills needed vary during the life of the project.

52 These characteristics must be managed. An integral part of managing the building and

construction process is the adoption of a suitable risk management strategy, incorporated into

contractual arrangements. This involves identifying the risks associated with building and

construction delivery processes and determining which parties to building and construction contracts should bear those risks .

Risks associated with large building and construction projects

53 Risk management issues are not unique to the building an.d construction industry. They are an

integral part of Australian management practices. The Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard for Risk Management defines risk management as :

... the term applied to a logical and systematic method of establishing the context,

identifying, analysing, evaluating, treating, monitoring and communicating risks

assoc18.ted with any activity, function or process in a way that will enable organisations to

minimise losses and maximise opportunities. 31

54 The entire building and construction process contains inherent risks. Builders and

subcontractors are responsible for delivering a project on time and within budget. Larger

projects involve greater risks; major contractors and subcontractors look to minimise risk to

reduce potentially large financial losses.

55 As noted by Crittall, 32 these risks, illustrated in table 4, may be categorised as falling:

(a) within the control of the owner;

(b) under the control of the builder; or

(c) outside the control of either party.

56 The incentive and effects of the way risk is managed in this industry, and whether risks are

being inappropriately passed on to smaller subcontractors , is a key issue that is discussed later

in this volume and then in the volumes on reform.

National Perspective Part 1 67

Table 4

Major categories of risk associated with building and construction projects

Items within the control of the owner

Timely and

instructions approvals

Access to site

Design changes

Payment methods

Use of consultants

Preparation of sufficient contract documentation

Quality workmanship

Financial accountability

Items under the control of the builder or head contractor

Ti mely letting of subcontracts

Programming of works and

materials ordering and storage

Site-specific industrial

disturbances

Site safety

Contract administration

Supervision

Quality workmanship

Financial accountability

Items outside the control of either party (costs usually shared between parties)

Acts of God - weather

National and industry-wide

strikes and stoppages (if the

disruption is site-specific, the

contractor must accept the risk

and the consequences of that risk)

Political interference - laws

Latent conditions which nobody could anticipate

Source: Based on Crittall, J. 1997 (online), 'Industrial Relations Risk in the Construction Industry- A Contractual Perspective' , a paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Conference of the AssoCiation of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand, Brisbane, p. 433 [accessed 20 January 2003], http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/depts/SMUAiraanz/old/conferce/pdf/crittal.pdf

Contracts in the building and construction industry

57 In a submission to the Royal Commission the Australian Industry Group (AIG) provided the

following description of the contractual process in the bwlding and construction industry.

The size, nature, location and complexity of major construction projects results in a

complex chain of contractual relationships.

Management of a construction project is delegated to a head contractor. Specialist work is then let to subcontractors. However, due to 1ssues such as scale and complexity, a

significant number of major construction projects have additional layers of contractual

relationships. Typically the head contractor divides a construction project into packages

of work. These packages are let to major subcontractors, who then in turn subcontract specialist work within each of the packages.

Major construction projects involve a complex sequence of Interdependent tasks that require different types of specialist workers. The level and types of specialist skills used vary over the life of the project. 33

68 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

58 The major types of building and construction contracts, set out in table 5, can be differentiated by:

(a) management structure;

(b) liability and risk sharing;

(c) design management;

(d) tendering procedures; and

(e) determination of contract pri ce.

Table 5

Major types of contracts in the building and construction industry

Contract Type

Traditional Tender

Design and Construct

Competitive Negotiation

Cost Plu s Contract

Contract Qualities

A project design team is appointed by the client.

Fixed cost tenders sought from builders.

Site handed over to successful tenderer.

Client's agent ad mini sters contract.

Construction work generally sub-let by the builder to specialist

subcontractors.

Bu ilder undertakes to del iver project for a fixed cost (usually), to

meet a performance specification produced by or on behalf of the

client.

Builder responsible for both design and construction elements of

the project.

Client appoints a team of consultants to prepare a design up to

preliminary drawings.

Tenders called from builders for the cost of preliminaries,

completion time, and a percentage for margins and off-site

overheads.

Successful tenderer then joins the consultancy team to prepare

final design documentation and erect the building. Often

subcontractors are also used.

Client selects builder on the basi s of a tendered fee to be paid in

excess of costs incurred .

Strategic Alliance Contracting Arrangement between contractors and client, which entails

difference between quoted and actual costs being shared

between both parties.

'No dispute' clause.

Source: Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects, Labour Market Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, p. 13.

National Perspective Part 1 69

59 Of the above, 'Trad itional Tendering ' is the most widely used type of contract in the industry. Typically it involves the client appointing an architect to do the project design and

documentation prior to any contract being entered into with the head contractor. The head

contractor provides the management services necessary to plan, co-ordinate and build the

works within agreed time and budget, as required by the contract documents. The head

contractor then engages subcontractors to undertake the building and construction work.

Some of these wil l employ their workforce. Many engage smaller sub-subcontractors.

Transferring delay costs

60 Under forms of contract where claims for variations and extensions are allowed, clients may

carry a significant share of the cost risk of industrial relations problems. Cost increases for

delays due to industrial disputes are typically claimed from clients under these contracts .

However, in the building and construction industry widespread use of Traditional Tendering ,

which is a fixed price contract, means that this risk is transferred to head contractors an d

subcontractors. Contracts usually impose sanctions on builders for delays in completing the

project, including delays due to industrial action. In turn, head contractors pass on similar

obligations to subcontractors. In the Commission's hearings Mr Gary May, Deputy Director

General of the Queensland Department of Public Works noted that from his observation the

main contractor is responsible for industrial relations on building projects. 34 There was a large

body of evidence given by head contractors in other states supporting that observation. For

example the evidence given by Mr Brian Seidler, the Executive Director of the Master Builders

Association of New South Wales, discussed the commercial exposure of head contractors to industrial action35

61 Similarly, the Department of Empl oyment and Workplace Relations noted that:

Fixed price building contracts have become the most common form of contract for large

capital city building projects since the early 1990s. These contracts impose client­

determined penalties to reflect the costs of delays (liquidated damages) and are used to

transfer most of the risks associated with a project from the client to the head contractor

A portion of the risk is passed down the contractual chain to each subcontractor, again

through fixed price contracts. The contractual system thus provides a strong incentive for

both head contractors and subcontractors to complete their work on time and within

budget. 36

62 Th e AIG described the position thus:

Head contractors are not usually the direct employers of the vast majority of labour on a

construction project. Head contractors are responsible for the project overall and they

typically have a direct contractual relationship with major subcontractors undertaking

packages of work. The subcontractors, in turn, have a contractual relationship with sub­ subcontractors who perform the bulk of the work on a project. This means that the head

contractor, who assumes the majority of the risk, has no direct contractual relationship

with the sub-subcontractors whose behaviour can significantly impact on that risk. 37

70 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

63 The Building Industry Specialist Contractors Organisation (Tasmania) argued that from a

subcontractor's point of view :

There must be a fair distribution of the risk associated with industrial action or dispute

when it occurs during the course of a contract. The present system that leads

subcontractors to absorb the majority of risk is detrimental to the long term interests of the industry and the community. 38

National Perspective Part 1 71

Notes to Structure of the Industry

ABS 2002 (Australian System of National Accounts, 2001-02, Nov 2002, Cat. no. 5204. 0).

ABS 2002 (Labour Force: Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6203.0).

Commonwealth Scientifi c and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (online), Built Environ ment

[accessed 23 December 2002], http://www.csiro.au/index.asp?type-sector&id-Built%20Environment&xml-sector&style-sectorAustralian

Context

NatBACC was establ ished by the Commonwealth Government in 1997 to foster a partnership between the Government and the building and construction industry and to advise on the development of an action agenda for the industry. The committee included representatives from major industry, commercial and

professional groups in the building and construction industry.

National Bui lding and Construction Committee 1999, A Report for Government by the National Building and Construction Committee, Canberra, p. 1 .

Sports Venue Technology (on li ne), Stadium Australia - Sydney [accessed 17 December 2002], http://www.sportsvenue-technology.com/projects/stadium australia

Cordell Construction Building Information Service Pty Limited , Database, information purchased by the Commission, project 282813.

Cordell Construction Building Information Service Ply Limited, Database, information purchased by Commission , project 277424.

Cordell Construction Building Information Service Ply Limited, Database, information purchased by Commission, project 225869. 1 ° Cordell Construction Building Information Service Ply Lim ited, Database, information purchased by

Commission, projects 374482, 374483, 374485, 374486, 374944 , 377876, 382334, 382336, 386288, 392516,394260,394602,394701,394861,3000800,3003604,3004147. 11 Cordell Construction Building Information Service Pty Limited, Database, information purchased by

Commission, project 4151306. 12 Cordell Construction Bui ld ing Information Service Pty Limited , Database, information purchased by Commission, project 541549. 13

Cordell Construction Building Information Service Pty Limited, Database, information purchased by Commission, project 665961. 14 Cordell Construction Building Information Service Pty Limited , Database, information purchased by

Commission, project 2147036. 15 The Tasman Economics work was released in fu ll in discussion paper 17.

16

Not elsewhere classified (see annexure 1 in volume 4 for a full list of the industry categories included in the model). 17 See an nexure 1 in volume 4 for more detail on the benefits to various industnes. 18

See annexu re 1 in volume 4. 19 Th is excludes single dwelling and alterati ons and additions to single dwellings. In 2000-01 83 per cent of

alterati ons and additions were attributed to single dwellings, and hence are outside the scope of the Commission's Terms of Reference. Over the past five years the amount of alterations and additions attributable to single dwelling ranged between 80 and 90 per cent. 2

° Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry: Phase One , 15 May, exhibit 494, paragraph 32, document 005.0151.0052.0002. 21 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 2002 (onli ne), Construct Australia- Forecasts of

Construction Industry Activity, Australia and all States and Territories, January 2002, p. 4 [accessed 7 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/ForecastsofConstructionDec2001 .pdf. Billion refers to 1 000 million.

72 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

22

Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) 2001 , Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, paragraph 29, document 064.0681.0226.0003. 23 Australian Constructors Association (ACA) (online) , About ACA [accessed 12 December 2002], http:/ /www.constructors.eom.au/pages/splash shortcut 02 .htm 24

Australian Constructors Association (ACA) 2002 (online) , Annual Report 2002, p. 24 [accessed

8 January 2003], http:/ /www.constructors.com.au/downloads/ ACA 2002 Annual Report.pdf. 25 ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97: Australia, Cat. no. 8772.0).

26

ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97: Australia, Cat. no . 8772 .0) .

27

Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) 2001, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, paragraphs 34- 35, 42-44, document 064.0681.0226.0003 . 28 Queensland Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 4 July, exhibit 821, paragraphs 22-24, document 001 .0001 .0529.0002.

29

Industry Science and Resources (ISR) 1999, Building for Growth: An Analysis of the Australian Building and Construction Industries, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

30 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects, Labour Market Research Report, Auslnfo , Canberra.

31

Standards Association of Australia 1999, Risk Management- Joint Standards Australia/Standards New

Zealand, AS/ NZS 4360:1999, Strathfield , NSW, p. 1. 32 Crittall, J . 1997 (online), 'I ndustrial Relations Risk in the Construction Industry- A Contractual Perspective ', a paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Association of Industrial Relations Academics

of Australia and New Zealand, Brisbane, p. 433 [accessed 20 January 2003], http://www. mngt. waikato .a c. nz/depts/SM U Ai raanz/old/conferce/pdf/ crittal. pdf 33 Australian Industry Group (AI G) 2001, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 12 November, exhibit 17, paragraph 4.1 , document 100.0964.0072.0001.

34 May, T1 156/47-48.

35 Seidler, T7 4 70/1 0-32.

36 Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission 1nto the Building and Construction Industry: Phase One , 15 May, exhibit 494, document 005.0151.0052 .0002 at 0011 . 37 Australian Industry Group (AIG) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in response to discussion papers 1-5, 30 June, exhibit 778, document

041 .0313.0689.0001 at 0007 .

38 Building Industry Specialist Contractors Organisation (Tasmania) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in reference to discussion paper 3, 24 June, exhibit

773, document 017 .0101 .0834.0003 at 0005.

National Perspective Part 1 73

7 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

3 Profile of Participants

The building and construction industry is made up of a number of key participants. Cl ients and

the providers of capital, including governments, have a key role to play. In addition to being a

provider of capital, governments have a po licy and regulatory role in the industry. Other key

participants are the employer and industry associations, head contractors, subcontractors and

workers. Unions play a major role in the industry.

Providers of capital and clients

2 Capital providers and clients in the building and construction industry can be categorised as

either public (government) or private sector. Capital providers finance projects whi le the c lients

are the owners of the project and are responsible for servicing the finance used to fund the

project. Usually the government takes on the roles of both financier and client.

3 Both capital providers and clients have simi lar views on their involvement in projects, seeking to

distance themselves from day to day management, including the management of industrial

relations. As AIG noted:

... project owners of major construction projects display the following common views:

• A requirement for certainty of project cost;

• A recognition that labour costs significantly impact upon overall project costs, and

constitute a high risk in cost management;

• A desire to maximise return on investment and net present value of a project, by

completion of the project on time and within budget;

• Where a project is constructed on an existing operational site, a desire to

quarantine operations from construction and to prevent the construction impacting

upon their operational workforce and employee relations structures. 1

4 Most clients in the building industry, whether in the private or government sector, do not want

to be directly involved in the industrial relations issues that may arise on site. It may on ly be

during major disputes that clients, often reluctantly, become aware of the industrial issues that

exist on their project. This aversion to involvement often extends to government clients. 2 The

implications of the approach taken by clients are discussed in the later volumes on reform.

National Perspective Part 1 7 5

5 All capital providers are in a position to influence the development and implementation of policy,

reg ulati ons and legislation pertaining to the industry. Governments , through codes of practice

for _ project procurement, have attempted to set requirements that impact on work

arrangements existing in the building and construction industry.

Private developers and financiers

6 Private developers play a significant role in the building and construction industry. They engage

in all kinds of construction activity: fro m residential and non-residential building to engineering

construction.

7 Overall, in 2001-02 the private sector accounted for 7 4 per cent of building and construction

activity and 63 per cent of the activity subject to my Terms of Reference .3 Private sector work

in the bu ild ing and engineering construction sectors is illustrated in charts I 0, II and 12. Chart

I 0 il lu strates the size of public and private sector activity under my Terms of Reference.

Chart 10

Value of building and construction done for the public and private sectors under the

Commission's Terms of Reference, 2001-02 ($'million)

12000

• Pnvate Sector D Public Sector

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

6051

251

New other residen tial bu ilding

677

29

Alterations and additions to other residential building

9571

Total non-residential bu ildi ng

Engineering construction

Source: ABS 2002 (Bu ild in g Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no . 8752 .0) and ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002 : Australia, Cat. no. 8762.0)

7 6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 11

Value of non-residential building done for the public and private sectors,

2001-02 ($'million)

• Private Sector 0 Public Sector

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

() (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) Cll (f) £ OJ Q_ Q) Q) (f) Q) c :::l 0 "§ () Q) (f) 0 0 Cll "' 6 (f) £ it= £: E Q) c a; (J) t5 0 3 I 0 "' () Qj Q) e! I lL .Do_ .:::l a: E () (D 1:J c e! w ·ro .r: 6 t Q) c w Source: ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8752.0) (f)

:::l 0

Q) c

a; ()

(f)

:;:,

National Perspective Part 1 7 7

Chart 12 Value of engineering construction work done for the public and private

sectors, 2001-02 ($'million)

4000

35 14

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

"'"' >-c

.en - :J -8 "' rou 0 c a: ro

• Private Sector D Public Sector

"' c 0 u

·c: :J

E E 0

u

Q)

3504

Source: ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia , Cat. no. 8762.0)

Qj .c

0

u

c

ro c

0

"' u

Q) a:

8 Many large infrastructure projects are now financed by private capital rather than direct

government expenditure.4 Private capital is generated from both domestic investors and

overseas investors. 5 The level of investment in major projects is substantial , sometimes

extend ing to billions of dollars,6 as is illustrated by the projects outlined previously in box 1.

9 Financing arrangements vary depending upon the size of the project and the parties involved.

Examples include 100 per cent financing, syndication and trust arrangements, or 'seed' money

being provided . According to the Australian Industry Group, the factors developers take into

consideration in deciding whether or not to invest include:

(a) political stability;

(b) availability of skill ed labour; and

(c) mechanisms to manage risk associated with construction ?

1 0 As capital providers, private developers and financiers are in a position to set requirements th at

impact on contract conditions between clients and head contractors.

7 8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Comm ercial interests

11 The typical private sector client is a development company seeking to undertake a building

project. The developer will approach a financer with a project proposal. The financier will

conduct a feas ibility study. Only about one in every 20 projects is approved by a financier.

Australian building and construction projects must demonstrate competitive cost and

investment returns to attract capital from private developers and financiers.

12 Projects will usually be put to tender on the basis that the contract will require the project to be

finished at a fixed time for a fixed price 8 Financiers will often take an active role in the selection

of the head contractor, as they must feel comfortable with whoever is chosen to undertake the project. 9

13 The client and its financier generally perform a ri sk assessment process, design ed to ensure

that the project risks are transferred to the head contractor. Their concern is to have the project

delivered on time and within budget. The risk assessment takes into account the tendering

contractor's previous 'track record' for delivering similar projects on time, within budget and

with minimal disruption. Consideration is given to the financial capacity of the contractor to

meet liq uidated damages, in the event that the project is not delivered on time. 10

14 The codes of practice for the building and construction industry apply on ly to govern ment

projects. The private sector is, however, encouraged to adopt the codes on a voluntary basis.

Superannuation funds

15 The Australian superannuation industry comprises over 240 000 funds . Ninety-nine per cent

are small , with less than five members. As at June 2002, about $519 400 million was invested

in superannuation funds in Australia.11 In Australia superannuation funds are a major source of

investment funding, including for the bui lding and construction industry. Major superannuation

funds include: Cbus, AMP and AXA.

16 Many of Australia's superannuation funds invest in building and construction, particularly the

building and construction industry funds, such as Cbus. Superannuation funds can be involved

in providing capital as an owner, developer, a joint venturer or a consortium.

Types of funds

17 The superannuation legislation recognises types of superannuation funds. In many cases ,

legislation imposes different requirements on different categories of funds.

18 Employer funds are run by organisati ons and are on ly open to people who work for th at

organisation. Although such funds are established by employers, the employers are not

permitted to control the money or make investments for the fund or use th e funds in any way

connected with their business.12

19 Industry funds are available for people who work in a particular industry, and are oft en linked

to a union. Increasingly, industry funds are expanding their membership base so that people

from any industry can be a member. Industry funds in Australia tend to operate on a state by

state basis, with the exception of the national superannuation scheme Cbus.

National Perspective Part 1 79

20 Master funds operate under a si ngle trust deed, even though the contributors do not share an

industry or the same employer. Master funds are offered by banks, trustee companies, life

in surance companies and similar institutions.

Investment powers

21 A trustee is vested with a legal responsibility to run the superannuation fund in the best interest

of its members. A trustee may be a person or a company. If the fund is large, the trustee is

usually a company with a Board of Directors representing the interests of both employees and

employers. The trustee must act in accordance with the relevant superannuation legislation

and the requirements of the trust deed - a legal document which establishes the ru les for

operating the superannuation fund. 13

22 The trustee of a fund is conferred with a general power of investment. Under the

superannuation fund's trust deed, the trustee is generally granted the power to enter into any

type of commercial undertaking and has the option to invest the funds, on behalf the members,

in building and construction projects. The trustee must set investment objectives having regard

to the whole of the circumstances of the Fund .

23 While trustees may provide members with a choice of investment strategies within a given

fund, legislation does not allow members to direct trustees to pursue individual investments.

24 Trustees' fiduciary obligations are codified in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act

1993 (C'wth) . The object of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (C'wth) is to

make provision for the prudent management and supervision of superannu ation funds. The

provisions relating to trustees ' obligations are contained in Part 12 of the Superannuation

Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (C'wth), which imposes special duties on the trustees and

investment managers of superannuation entities.

25 Section 109 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (C 'wth) requires that all

investments of superannuation funds be made on an arm's-length basis. This section

endeavours to ensure that members' benefits are not reduced or put at risk.

Commercial interests

26 Superannuation funds are required to be maintained solely for the 'core' purpose of providing

retirement and death benefits to members.14 The main concern of superannuation funds is the

best interests of the members. While permitted to make investments to maximise returns to

members, the prime responsibility of the fund trustee is the prudent management of

superannuation savings.15

27 Industry funds will often invest in the in dustry to which its members belong, in order to

contribute to the development of that industry. Cbus, the dominant superannuation fund in the

building and construction industry, invests a proportion of its portfolio in building and

construction projects. At 30 June 2002 Cbus had invested over $781 million in property and

$283 million in infrastructure. 16 Its investments in the building and construction industry are

spread across much of Australia , and include developments in the Barossa Valley South

Australia, the City Square in Melbourne, airports in Victoria and Tasmania , and buildings in

Western Australia. 17

80 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Public sector

28 All levels of government, Commonwealth, State, Territory and local are involved in the building

and construction industry. Government projects include educational, health and miscellaneous

buildings, such as law courts, homes for the aged, orphanages, gaols, barracks, public toilets,

and ambulance, fire and police stations. Government engineering construction projects include

telecommunications infrastructure, roads and highways, railways , bridges, electricity

generation and transmission, pipelines, and water storage, supply, sewerage and drainage.

29 Overal l, the public sector accounts for 26 per cent of building and construction activity and 37

per cent of the activity subject to the Commission 's Terms of Reference. 18 Nearly all of the work

undertaken for the public sector is under the Commission's Terms of Reference because

government has very little involvement in the construction of single dwellings. Government

work in the building and engineering construction sectors was illustrated earlier in charts 1 0, 11

and 12 above.

30 While the government workforce undertakes a lot of building and construction work (work done

by the public sector), Governments also contract out work (work done by the private sector for

the public sector). The importance of these two categories of work for engineering construction

projects is illustrated in chart 13.

Chart 13

Value of engineering construction work done, chain volume measures, 2001-02 ($'million}

15000

-- By the private sector for the pu b lic sector 12000

10055

9000

8451

6621

6000

5966

3000

2282

0

r- (J) N

OJ OJ q>

0 ro o; OJ ro

Total by the public sector - Total for the public sector

12546

7916

4630

8

m (J)

0

6

8 N

7184

N 9

8 N

Source: ABS 2002 (Table 1: Val ue of work done , Chai n Volume Measures, En gineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8762. 0)

Note: This data is based upon chain volu me measures. Chain volu me measures are not additive for most periods; the component measures do not sum to a total in the same way as the corresponding

current pri ce components do.

National Perspective Part 1 81

31 The Commonwealth budget papers provide information on capital expenditure. However, this

includes much more th an just building and construction industry works; and building and

construction projects often come under other industry expenditure categories . For example,

there is a considerable amount of building and construction work incorporated in the defence

budget. It is therefore to be expected that in many of the reported categories in

Commonwealth budgets there is a mixture of building and construction wi th other expenditure.

32 The 2002-03 Commonwealth Budget incorporated considerable expenditure on building and construction. Road construction is a major component of this work. Tab le 6 provides

projections of Commonwealth expenditure on road construction and maintenance.

Table 6

Major components of the Commonwealth Budget Road Transport sub-function

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 $m $m $m $m $m

National Highway and Roads of 1093 981 929 1245 1050

National lmportance(a)

Road Safety Black Spot Programme 49 45 45 45 45

Roads to Recovery 418 202 302 252 0

Other 41 99 40 32 32

Total (b) 1602 1327 1316 1573 112 7

Source: Commonwealth of Australia 2002, 2002-2003 Budget; CanPrint Communications Pty Limited pp. 6- 51 .

(a) Largely Specific Purpose Payment funding to States and Territories but with a small additional

component for land transport research.

(b) See Outcome 1 of Transport and Regional Services 2002-03 Portfolio Budget Statement.

33 The work of the Joi nt Standing Committee on public works provides information on the nature of large Commonwealth bui lding and construction projects. Parliament, or the Governor­

General if Parl iament is not sitting, can refer to the Committee projects valu ed at more than

$6 million. The Committee reviewed about $200.3 mi llion of public works projects in 2002. In 2001 it reviewed over $559.4 million of projects .19

34 It is not possible to estimate annual Commonwealth expenditure from the Committee reports because these projects usually span several years and the Committee does not report on the

commencement or progress of the projects.

82 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

35 Much of the public sector expenditure on building and construction projects is initiated by State

and Territory governments. State Governments are major clients of the building and

construction industry. According to the Austra lian Procurement and Construction Council they

commission 25 to 30 per cent of non-residential building, 35 to 40 per cent of engineering

construction and a small amount of residential building 2 0 Some examples of the level of State

and Territory expenditure in building and construction are in box 2. This demand is generated

by direct government investment, and, increasingly, through joint arrangements between the public and private sector.

Box 2 Examples of State and Territory expenditure on building and

construction

The New South Wales Government's annual capital works and maintenance program is

approximately $6.5 billion. Expenditure on asset acquisitions and maintenance for the

2001-02 financial year included:

Infrastructure

• roads $1570 million;

• electricity $1050 million;

• other transport $930 million;

• water $260 million; and

• environment protection $400 mi llion.

Buildings

• health $730 million;

• education $550 millim; and

• housing $390 million .21

For 2001-02 the Western Australian Government's planned Capital Works Program

totalled $3.3 billion. 22

In 2000-01 the gross fixed capital expenditure for the Tasmanian Government sector

was $280 million. The expenditure was on:

• other dwellings $16.8 million;

• other construction $138.3 million;

• equipment other than Transport $78.1 million; and

• transport Equipment $46.9 million. 23

In 2001 $224 million was spent by the Northern Territory Government on new fixed

assets .24

National Perspective Part 1 83

36 The government as a client faces simi lar issues to all other clients. The difference between

government and private clients is their long term , continuous involvement in the industry, and

the potential for their objectives as a client to conflict with broader government objectives.

Governments, as do private clients, have a desire to maximise their return on investment by

completing projects on time and within budget. The community is entitled to expect that the

public sector wil l conduct its business activities with efficiency, expertise, economy, fairn ess,

and impartial ity and with high standards of probity and accountability.

37 A government client is accountable for ensuring that each construction project for which it is a

capital provider:

(a) is delivered within its budget;

(b) is completed on time;

(c) meets the end users' objecti ves;

(d) is managed appropriately from the outset to completion; and

(e) complies with government requirements for probity and accountability.

38 Government clients face issues of risk management similar to the private sector. A govern ment

must be able to identify and manage risks, monitor and measure the performance of

contracted parties, manage the transition from the planning role to the contracting role, and maintain responsibility for any changes to the scope of work. It if does not manage risks

effectively the government could find itself responsible for cost overruns.

39 Governments have the right to choose with whom th ey do business and to determine and

communicate the standards of performance and behaviour they expect from all industry

participants. Codes of practice are a key mechanism that all governments have used to

manage their involvement in the building and construction industry.

40 Often the public sector uses pre-qualification processes for projects over a certain monetary

value. The pre-qualification process requires consideration of factors including value for money,

previous performance in meeting budget and completion deadlines, and adherence to the

relevant code of practice. This is a way in which government can encourage bu il ders,

subcontractors and workers (whether individually or as a collective) to observe the rel evant

code of practice.

National Construction Code

41 Th e National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry (the National Construction Co de)

was introduced on 22 September 1997 to promote best practice in the building and

construction industry. The National Construction Code was jointly developed by the

Commonwealth, States and Territories, and was written by the Australian Procurement and

Construction Council , the national body for policy advice on procurement and construction

industry matters.

42 The National Construction Code is the central code within the industry. It has been adopted by

the Commonwealth Government, and the Governments of South Australia, Tasmania, the

Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. It has been endorsed by the Victorian

84 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Government. Although the New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australian Codes do

not adopt the National Code, they complement it and bu il d upon it. No governmen t has

proclaimed a Code inconsistent with the National Code, although there are variations to suit the

priorities and circumstances relevant to particular jurisdictions, as the National Code contemplated. 25

43 The National Construction Code applies to the construction industry which is defined to

include:

all organised activities concerned with demolition, building, landscaping, maintenance,

civil engineering, process engineering, mining and heavy engineering. 26

44 The Code only applies to parties doing business with the Federal Government, or a State or

Territory Government that has adopted the Code, not to the industry as a whole. Construction

companies not performing government work, and employer and employee associations are

not obliged to comply with the Code.

45 The Australian Procurement and Constructi on Council argued that adoption of the Code

' ... expresses a comm itment to deal on ly with organisati ons and personnel in the con struction

industry whose standards and be haviour conform with pri nciples expressed in the Code. In

particular, coercion in any form is prohibited '.27

46 The National Code of Practice expresses the principles which governments agree should

underpin the future development of the bui lding and construction industry in Australia. Those

principles are:

1. Clients have the right to choose with whom they do business and to determine and

communicate the standards of performance and behavior they expect from all

industry participants. 28

2. Business relationships must be built upon the essential qualities of trust, co­

operation, equity and honesty These qualities must be reflected at all links in the

contract chain . 29

3. Principles of ethical behavior must be adhered to by all parties, at all times, and at

all levels. Tendering processes must be conducted with commitment, honesty and fairness. Anti-competitive behavior or any other practice which denies other

participants legitimate business opportunities are unacceptable. These practices

are inconsistent with the establishment and maintenance of ethical business

practices which must underlie good working relationships between a client and a

service provider and between service providers. 30

4. A positive commitment to best practice is required of all industry participants. This

commitment will be demonstrated by evidence of continuous improvement; excellent business practices and relationships; effective organisational systems

and standards; exceptional people management policies and practices; and,

superior, time, cost and quality outcomes. 31

5. Industry participants are encouraged to adopt a broad-based agenda to improve productivity through the development of workplace and management practices

National Perspective Part 1 85

that are flexible and responsive to the business demands of the enterprise and its

clients' requirements. An Enterprise with this focus will achieve a workplace culture

that is recognized for value, quality, innovation and competitiveness and will be a

preferred partner for clients ' projects. 32

6. OHS & R [Occupational Health Safety & Rehabilitation] obligations must be actively

addressed by all industry participants. Unequivocal commitment to OHS&R

management must be demonstrated in systems that address responsibilities,

policies, procedures and performance standards to be met by all parties involved in

a project and are directly linked to quality OHS&R outcomes. 33

7. .. .industrial relations principles embodied in this Code are to apply to the

construction projects. 34

8. . .. the highest ethical standards must be observed throughout the contract chain.

This specifically includes ensuring the timely progress of the processing,

management and finalisation of claims, payments, retentions and securities due

under the contract for all parties. 35

47 To aid in the implementation of and to supplement the National Construction Code, the

Commonwealth Government issued implementation guidelines in February 1998 and industry

guidelines (based on the implementation guidelines) in March 1998. The guidelines detail

processes that the Government established to monitor and report on the Code. Th e guidelines

are Commonwealth Government guidelines, and do not represent an ag reed position of all

governments. They are more detailed than the Code.

48 The National Construction Code allows the Commonwealth Government to require those

wishing to deal with it to demonstrate compliance with the terms and standards of the Code.

Failure to demonstrate such compliance could resu lt in the deprivation of the right to deal with

government with disadvantageous commercial consequences.

49 The effectiveness of the Code and the possible ways of improving its effectiveness are

discussed in Volume 7, Reform National Issues Part 1, of this report .

State Codes

50 The State and Territory codes of practice are referred to in Volumes 12, State and Territory

Overviews , and Volume 7, Reform -National Issues Part 1, of this report. Briefly, Codes of

Practice for the building and construction industry have been introduced in the States and

Northern Territory, consistent with the principles establ ished in the National Code. Individual

governments tai lor their codes to suit the priorities and circumstances relevant to particular

jurisdictions. The National Code provides the minimum level of compliance.

51 New South Wales - The current code for New South Wales is the Code of Practice for the

Construction Industry (1996) , which reflected the earlier 1992 code for the State. The 1992

code was introduced to use th e State's purchasing power to promote fundamental reforms in the New South Wales building industry. In November 2000 the Minister for Public Works and

Services announced a review of the New South Wales Code to ensu re that its objectives

remained appropriate in the prevai ling environment. A draft of a new code was released in

86 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

April 2002. The proposed code retains a strong focus on enterprise agreements and project

agreements in the industry. A breach of the code may result in sanctions being applied.

52 Victoria - The Victorian Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (1 999)

describes minimum standards of acceptable practice for the building and construction industry

in its dealings with Government. The Victorian Code endorses the National Code. The Victorian

Code applies to all parties involved in 'public construction' as defined in s3 of the Project

Development and Construction Management Act 1994 (Vic). It must be observed by all parties

involved in such work. The Victorian Code prescribes the conditions which must be observed

by government agencies and statutory corporations in their dealings with the industry.36

53 Queensland - The code for Queensland is the Code of Practice for the Building and

Construction Industry (2000) . The code came into operation in August 2000. It applies to all

government building, construction , maintenance and material supply contracts, consultants,

commissions and government funded projects and sites . The code sets out specific principles

and standards of behaviour that underpin best practice and promotes a shift in industry cu lture

away from the adversarial approach towards a co-operative model. 37 A breach of the code

may result in preclusion from tendering from work for a specified period of time .

54 Western Australia - The code for Western Australia is the Code of Practice for the Bu ilding

and Construction Industry in Western Australia (2002), introduced after a review of the previous

code. The Western Australian Government has stated that it hopes that industry support for

the new code 'wi ll lead to higher safety standards, greater productivity and aims for the

promotion of a cu lture of best practice' .38 While the new code does not contain specific

compliance provisions, there is a Code Monitoring Committee which can receive complaints

concern in g alleged breaches of the code excluding industrial relations matters and matters

being dealt with before the courts or by other formal dispute resolution processes. The

committee has no statutory powers to determine matters and is not a disputes settlement

body. It reports on matters for the benefit of the Minister for Consumer and Employment Protection 3 9

55 South Australia - The code of Practice for the South Australian Building and Construction

Industry came into operation in July 1 995. The Code establishes principles to achieve value for

money for all South Australians by working with the building and construction industry to

improve the way in which business is conducted. There is no specific industrial relations

component in the code. Any sanctions for breaches of the code are applied by the appropriate

Minister.

56 Tasmania - The National Construction Code applies to the building and construction industry

in Tasmani a. Tasmania adopted the National Code in December 1998. Any party wishi ng to do

business with th e Tasman ian Government or work on State Government projects is required to

comply with the National Code40 The Tasmanian annexure to the code adds specific details

relating to Tasmanian circumstances and provides a brief statement of Tasmanian Government

compliance and sanctions methods. The Tasmanian Government submitted that by adopting

the National Code it has committed to deal only with organisations and personnel in the

construction industry whose standards and behaviour conform to the principles expressed in

the code 41

National Perspective Part 1 8 7

57 Australian Capital Territory - The Australian Capital Territory government has adopted the

National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry.

58 Northern Territory - The Northern Te rritory has the Northern Territory Procurement Code

(2000) . The Procurement Code is an adaptation of the National Code. The amendments reflect Northern Territory circumstances and have a broader application to procurement in all

industries 42 The code sets a minimum standard of conduct for business in the Territory and

encourages the adoption of good business practices 43 Compliance with the code is a

condition for tendering for government construction projects. The Northern Territo ry Code

contains compliance provisions that specify sanctions for non-compliance with the code.

Other roles of governments

59 Governments, in addition to the role of client, have policy and regulatory roles .

Policy roles of governments

60 Governments have a long-term interest in maintaining a viab le and internationally competitive

construction industry. Each government seeks to create an environment in which there is the

opportunity for the construction industry to be innovative, efficient and profitable while

demonstrating continuous improvement of core skills and competencies 4 4

61 The construction industry has a critical influence on Australian lifestyle, creating work sites,

recreation places, schools, hospitals and vital economic and social infrastructure such as roads, water and electricity supply and telecommunications. Productivity in allied Australian

industries is heavily reliant on the performance of the building and construction industry.

Included are wholesale and retail trade industries, component, fitting and furnishing

manufacturers and suppliers and commercial and horne finance lending and investment

services. Architectural and engineering professional service industries are also closely

linked to the construction industry. 45

62 The construction industry in Australia must be efficient and competitive if it is to fu lfil its potential

to contribute towards national economic growth.

63 Governments' interest in policy issues relating to building and construction is illustrated by the

large number of reviews relating to the industry, and the amount of government funded

research into building and construction.

Comm onwealth

64 There have been a number of Commonwealth reviews, research programs and policy initiatives

in the building and construction industry including the following:

• Industry Commission, Construction Costs of Major Projects, 1991;

• Construction Industry Development Agency, 1991 to 1995;

• Productivity Commission, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects,

1999; and

88 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• National Building and Construction Industry Council and the Commonwealth Building and

Construction Industries Action Agenda, launched in 1999 and sti ll being implemented.

35 A discussion paper produced by the Commission on these reviews is at annexure 2 in Volume

4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report. Commonwealth initiatives to implement policy

related to the building and construction industry have been continuous (chart 14).

Chart 14

Policy actions by the Commonwealth

r

I

I

I

I

L

1991-95

Construction Industry Development Agency (CIDA)

Established to implement the industry reform agenda and develop a consistent set of standards for

the selection of service providers to allow clients to use their market position to demand change.

' 1995-97

Australian Construction Industry Council (ACIC)

The ACIC comprised industry, union and government representatives and

succeeded CIDA in its Construction Industry Reform Strategy

+

1997-99

National Building and Construction Committee (NatBACC)

Responsible for the development of the Building and Construction Action Agenda4 6

1

1999-present

Australian Construction Industry Forum (ACIF)

A peak body representing the interests of the industry, implementing the Action Agendas47

National Perspective Part 1 89

66 NatBACC comprised representatives from major industry, commercial and professional groups

in the building and construction industry. The focus of the Action Agendas was to identify and

address impediments to growth in the industry. NatBACC produced a series of resea rch

reports.

67 The Action Agendas, were designed to create a more value focussed market place in five key

areas:

• creating a more informed marketplace;

• maximising global business opportunities;

• fostering technological innovation;

• creating economically and ecologically sustainable environments; and

• creating a best practice regulatory environment. 48

68 The Government accepted the recommended Action Agendas put forward by NatBACC and

they are being implemented. To assist with implementation of the Action Agendas, the

Australian Construction Industry Forum (ACIF) was established. The Government has

committed $3.6 million for the Action Agenda initiatives.

69 The Commonwealth has undertaken initiatives with State Governments and industry to review

other issues related to the building and construction industry, such as training. These reviews

are discussed in other volumes.

State and Territory

70 The States and Territories have demonstrated an interest in policy development in the bu ilding

and construction industry. The Royal Commission into Productivity in the Building and

Construction Industry in New South Wales (the Gyles Royal Commission) and the Victorian

Economic Development Committee were major reviews conducted at the State level. The

Gyles Royal Commission was established in 1991 to review productivity in the building industry

in New South Wales. It produced a final report in 1992. It focussed primarily on illegal activities

within the industry and industrial relations issues, which it saw as the main impediments to

efficiency and productivity. The main recommendations were:

• investigation and prosecution (civil and criminal) through the Building Industry Task Force;

• the Building Workers' Industrial Union (BWIU) be reformed or deregistered;

• the Government, as a client, take the lead in reform; and

• a Ministry of Construction be established.

71 Commissioner Gyles recommended the adoption of two principal strategies, namely, the

re-establishment of the rule of law in the building industry, and the use of the State's purchasi ng

power to influence change within the industry49

72 In response to the level of criminal activity and industrial disputation, a Building Industry Task

Force was established during the life of the Gyles Royal Commission. The Bui lding Industry

Task Force was assigned responsibility for investigating criminal and civil matters identified in

the final report; and for starting legal proceedings where it believed there was sufficient

90 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

evidence . Special attention was to be given to practices, such as collusive tendering , 'no ticket

no start', payment for lost time, second ary boycotts, intimidation and abuse of safety

legislation. It was to co-ordinate civil proceedings on behalf of Government, an d liaise with the

New South Wales ·Crime Commission and Commonwealth Trade Practices Commission

regarding organised and sophisti cated crimes and anticompetitive practi ces in the New South

Wales building and construction industry50

73 Consistent with Commissioner Gyles' recommendation that the New South Wales

Government, as a client , take a lead role, the Construction Agencies Steering Committee was

established to co-ordinate and facilitate the overhaul of government standards and policies,

and to develop consistent building, consultant and contractual policies to be implemented by

government agencies 51 As a result of a joint effort by construction agencies through the

Construction Policy Steering Committee, the New South Wales Government published the

Code of Practice for the Construction Indu stry, and associated Code of Tendering, as the

principal means of utilising the State's purchas ing power to promote reforms in the industry. 52

74 In 1992, pursuant to the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968 (Vic), the Economic Development

Committee (EDC) was constituted to inquire into the Victorian building and construction

industry. The EDC produced six reports for Parliament on the corruption of the tendering

process, evidentiary powers of parliamentary committees, code of tendering , security of

payments and a final report, including a report on union assets.

75 There have been reviews considering reform arrangements for providing security of payments

by State Governments in New South Wales in 1996 and 2002, and in Queensland and Western

Australia in 200 1. State and Territory Governments have undertaken numerous other initiatives

to improve work place health and safety in the building and construction industry, and develop

Codes of Practice, training and design initiatives.

Regulatory roles of governments

76 Governments use reg ul ation to implement their policies. The regulatory framework re levant to

the Commission 's Terms of Reference is discussed in chapter 4. This is not the only fo rm of

regulation relevant to the industry.

77 The key instruments include legislation , su bordinate legislation (such as regulations) and

government codes of practice.

78 Local governments for example affect the building and construction industry by pl anning and

building local by-laws and regulations. They have sig nificant powers to control assemblies and

processions. Th is is through the conferral of power to control public places and traffic and to

make by-laws in respect of those matters. 53 This tier of regulation has implications for the

approach to industrial disputes as local authorities may impose penalties for contraven tions of

such local regulations .

79 A sig nificant issue is whether there is conflict arising from the ro les of government as client,

policy maker and regulator.

National Perspective Part 1 91

Industry associations

80 The building and construction industry has numerous industry associations. Some have

national coverage and others small sub-sectoral coverage. Some are peak bodies. These are

listed in box 3.

Box 3 Employer and industry organisations and associations

Air Conditioning and Mechanical Contractors' Association of Australia Limited

Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturers Association Australia Inc

Asbestos Removal Contractors' Association

Association of Consulting Architects - Australia

Association of Consulting Engineers Australia

Association of Consulting Structural Engineers of NSW

Australasian Concrete Paving Association

Australian Asphalt Pavement Association

Australian Building Services Association

Australian Bu siness Limited

Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (including State and Territory branches)

Australian Contractors Association

Australian Council of Building Design Professions Ltd

Australian Elevator Association Ltd

Australian Employers Federation, The

Australian Industry Group

Australian Institute of Building, The

Australian Institute of Building Surveyors, The

Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors, The

Australian Pi peline Industry Association Inc

Australian Shop and Office Fitting Industry Association

Australian Stabilisation Industry Association

Australian Stainless Steel Development Association

Australian Steel In stitute, The

Australian Underground Construction and Tunnelling Association

92 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Building and Construction Council NSW Inc

Building Designers .Association of Australia Ltd. (including State and Territory branches)

Building Industry Specialist Contractors Organisation of Australia (including State and Territory branches)

Building Science Forum of Australia NSW Division

Business Council of Australia

Business SA

Cement and Concrete Association of Austral ia

Cement Industry Federation

Ceramic Industry Association of Australia

Chamber of Commerce and Industry Western Australia

Civil Contractors Federation

Clay Brick and Paver Association of New South Wales

Concrete Institute of Australia

Concrete Masonry Association of Australia

Concrete Pipe Association of Australasia

Construction Industry Engineering Services Group Ltd

Confederation of A.C.T. Industry

Crane Industry Council of Australia (Inc in NSW; including State associations)

Crushed Stone and Sand Association of NSW

Demolitions Contractors Association of Victoria

Electrical Contractors Association of Western Australia Incorporated

Electrical Contractors Industry Association Tasmania

Electricity Association of New South Wales

Employers' Federation of New South Wales

Eng ineering Employers Association of SA

Federation of Australian Concrete Pumping Associations (including State and Territory

branches)

National Perspective Part 1 93

Federation of Watt and Ceiling Industries of Australia and New Zealand (including State

and Territory branches)

Fire Contractors' Federation

Glass and Glazing Association of South Australia Inc

Hardware Association of Queensland

Hardware Federation of Australia

Housing Industry Association Limited (i ncluding State and Territory branches)

Landscape Industries Association of Australia Inc

Master Builders Australia Inc (including State and Territory branches)

Master Painters Australia Ltd

Master Plasterers' Association of Western Australia Union of Employers

Master Platers, Tilers & Shingters Association of New South Wales Inc

Master Plumbers' and Mechanical Services Association of Australia, The

Master Plumbers Australia Limited (including State and Territory branches)

Master Stonemasons Association Victoria Inc

Master Tile Layers Association of SA Inc

National Electrical and Communications Association (including State and Territory

branches)

National Precast Concrete Association Austra lia Inc

Process Engineers and Constructors Association Inc

Property Council of Australia

Royal Australian Institute of Architects, The

Southern Gold Coast Chamber of Commerce, The

Structural Steel Fabricators' Association, The

Surface Coatings Association Australia Inc.

Victorian Congress of Employer Associations

94 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

81 These groups form part of the technical support infrastructure of the industry through the

provision of policy advice and business services. Theoretically they provide a collective voice for

smaller firms such as subcontractors. In practice, the extent of subcontractors' involvement

depend s on the consultation mechanisms used within the employer and industry

organ isations . Overall , the divers ity of these groups provides a challenge for the industry to

present cohesive input into policy debates. It is difficult to identify any one organisation that

represents a particular group within the industry as there is overlap in types of businesses

represented by many of the organisations . A financial analysis of the principal employer associations is inclu ded at attachment 1.

82 Employer associations play a formal role in industrial relations when registered under the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). Reg istration brings with it certain rights and obligations.

Registration of associations is regulated under Part IX of the Act. Upon registration under s1 92, an organisation:

(a) is a body corporate;

(b) has perpetual succession;

(c) has power to purchase, take on lease, hold, sell, lease, mortgage, exchange and

otherwise own, possess and deal with any real or personal property;

(d) shall have a common seal; and

(e) may sue or be sued in its registered name.

83 Part X of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) deals with the cancellation of reg istration of

registered organisations.

84 In the building and construction industry the following employer organisations are registered

under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth):

(a) Australian Industry Group;

(b) Civil Contractors Federation;

(c) Master Builders Association of South Australia Inc;

(d) Master Builders Association of New South Wales Inc;

(e) Master Builders Association of Tasmania Inc;

(n Master Builders Association of Victoria;

(g) Master Builders Construction and Housing Association of the Australian Capital Territory;

and

(h) National Electrical and Communications Association.

85 Employer associati ons and trade unions whi ch operate in the building and construction

industry may be registered under State workplace relations law. These associations are

separate legal entities from those registered under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth).

Each State workplace relations law specifies the rights and responsibilities of those

associations.

National Perspective Part 1 95

86 The major general associations, covering more than one trade or sector include:

(a) Australian Constructors Association (ACA)-members include a significant number of

large national head contractors;

(b) Master Builders of Australia Inc. (MBA lnc)-members of the national body are the State

and Territory Master Bui lders Associations. Members of the State and Territory

associations include large employers across the commercial sector, and small employe rs

and subcontractors involved in all sectors of the industry;

(c) Civi l Contractors Federation (CCF)-members comprise contractors working on civil eng ineering projects;

(d) Housing Industry Association Lim ited (H IA)-members include residential build ers,

developers and commercial bui lders, manufacturers and suppliers, contractors, build ing

consu ltants and professional service providers. It offers membership to financ ial institutions, government agencies and students; and

(e) Australian Industry Group (AIG)-members include employers of various industry sectors,

including build ing and construction, with significant involvement in engineering construction .

Australian Constructors Association

87 The ACA was established in 1 994, following the dissolution of the Australian Federation of

Constructors Contractors. It is an association of 15 of the largest head contractors in Australi a.

Members must be construction companies that operate in two or more Australian states and

have an annual turnover in excess of $200 million 5 4 They operate in the residential and

non-residential building markets, engineering construction, process engineering, contract

mining, engineering design, infrastructure development and maintenance, oil and gas

operations and maintenance, telecommunications services and environmental industries 55

88 ACA is incorporated as a company limited by guarantee. ACA is not a reg istered industrial

association and , therefore, does not represent its members in negotiations on workp lace

arrangements. It has an agreement that the AIG provides industrial relations advice on

occasion . AIG organised a working group of ACA members' in dustri al relations managers to

make contributions to the AIG submissions to the Royal Commission 5 6

89 The ACA mission states that members are ' .. . dedicated to making the construction industry

safer, more efficient, more competitive and better able to contribute to the development of

Australia' 5 7 Its objectives are:

(a) To require the highest standards of skill, integrity and responsibility of member

companies.

(b) To represent the interests of major contractors to government and other decision

makers.

(c) To enhance and promote the status of construction contractors and the industry

they serve.

(d) To faCilitate the exchange of information and. encourage furth er research. 58

96 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

90 The ACA has a Code of Ethics that its members agree to abide by:

(a) Honesty and integrity - Association members shall undertake all business dealings

with honesty and integrity;

(b) Fair and Healthy Competition - The Association shall promote fair and healthy

competition between members and throughout the industry;

(c) Confidentiality and Intellectual Property - Association members will respect

intellectual property rights and maintain confidentiality in their dealings with each

other and with clients, consultants, sub-contractors and suppliers;

(d) Tendering Practices - Association members wiJ/ not engage in practices such as

collusion, hidden commissions, unsuccessful tender fees or any other secret arrangement;

(e) Principles of Best Practice - Members shall adopt best practice principles and

strive for increased productivity and enhanced skills through education and training;

(f) Relationship Contracting - Members shall promote relationship contracting

principles and practices with clients to reduce contractual disputation and add

value for the benefit of all parties;

(g) Payment Practice - Members shall conduct relationships with consultants, sub­

contractors and suppliers in an ethical manner, and meet all financial obligations for

payments;

(h) Health and Safety - Members shall provide a safe and healthy workplace for all

employees;

(i) The Community and Environment - Association members shall meet their

obligations to the community arising from construction activity and to protect the

physical environment;

OJ Laws and Regulations - Members shall abide by all laws and regulations affecting

the industry and shall promote improvements to such laws, regulations and

subordinate legislation. 59

91 The Chief Executive of each member company is a Director on the ACA Board.

Australian Industry Group

92 The Australian Industry Group is an independent industry and employer representative body,

which has over 10 000 member companies throughout Australia . Its members belong to the

manufacturing, construction, engineering and service industries60 AIG has relationships with

owners of projects, head contractors and subcontractors within the building and construction

industry. AIG's involvement in building and construction is mainly within the engineering

construction sector, but it has some members in building.

National Perspective Part 1 9 7

93 AIG is represented on three building and construction industry fund Boards.

(a) The Director of Queensland AIG, Mr David Whiting, is a Director and Secretary of Allied

Unions Superannuation Trust (Queensland) Pty Ltd.

(b) The AIG's former Director, Mr Derek Buckiand, represents AIG as a Director of Australian

Construction Industry Redundancy Trust Fund Pty Ltd.

(c) The Director of Victoria AI G, Mr Paul Fen nelly, is a Director of Co iNVEST Li mited 61

94 The services provided to members include:

(a) strategic planning, design, development, negotiation and implementation of employee

relations structures;

(b) advice and representation to clients, contractors and subcontractors;

(c) occupational health and safety and environment services;

(d) train ing and ski ll s development services;

(e) ri sk identification and management strategies 6 2

95 The AIG provides management and advisory services to the ACA.

Master Builders Australia Inc

96 The MBA Inc is the peak national body for the Master Builders Associations in various states

and territories . The State and Territory Master Builders Associations have over 23 000

members, rangi ng from large multinational and national contractors to small 'husband and

wife' subcontracting businesses. 63 Contractors and subcontractors are not members of MBA

Inc, but are members of State or Territory Master Buil ders Associations 64

97 In I 994 MBA Inc adopted a Nat ional Code of Practice (the MBA Code) now in its second

ed ition . Organisations must comply with the MBA Code as a condition of membership. The

principles of the MBA Code are ' ... independent endeavour and freedom of association ,

enterprise and competition for the benefit of Australia 's economy and quality of life ' 6 5

98 State and Territory Master Builders Associations members work in all sectors of the building

and construction industry. 66

99 MBA Inc objectives include:

1. protect and advance the interests and status of builders, contractors,

subcontractors, suppliers, project and construction managers and other persons

engaged in any capacity in the industry (which is defined to mean the ''Australian

building construction, civil engineering and housing industry);

2. set the highest standards of skill, integrity and responsibility associated with

Membership and maintain and enhance the reputation for skill, integrity and

responsibility of members of Association Members;

98 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

3. provide an authoritative and representative voice for builders, contractors,

subcontractors, suppliers, project and construction managers and other persons

engaged in the Industry on matters of common interest;

4. establish codes of ethical conduct for builders, contractors, subcontractors,

suppliers, project and construction managers and other persons engaged in the

Industry and use every effort to ensure the observance of such codes by Members. 57

Features and services

100 The MBA website lists 'features and services' provided to members. These include the following:

(a) Techn ical building codes and standards

• MBA Inc is a member of some 7 4 industry, technical , regulatory and standards

setting committees, convened by either Standards Australia or the Australian Building Codes Board.

• It provides members with information on Australian standards, local authority

requirements , building act requirements, advice on legislation and regulations ,

requirements of the building licensing authorities and trade practices legislation.

(b) Workplace relations

• MBA Inc seeks to offer its members a: full range of workplace relations services. It

often appears in AIRC proceedings in relation to the award .

• MBA Inc provides telephone advice on new events and specific local industrial

conditions. It may become involved in negotiations with unions, on -site audits,

advocacy and preparation of documents.

• MBA Inc lobbies government and is a member of the National Labour Consultative Council.

• State and Territory associations offer members advice and representation for:

industrial disputes; award conditions; employment legislation, including workers

compensation, annual and long service leave and discrimination; enterprise

agreements; unfair dismissals; apprenticeships; site allowance claims; redundancy;

and superannuation.

(c) Training and employment

• MBA Inc offers education and training packages on: occupational health and

safety; supervisory and management skills; industrial relations; negotiations and

mediation; technical sem inars; use and administration of contracts; and application

of the partnering concept on construction projects.

(d) Apprenticeship services

National Perspective Part 1 99

• All members of the industry can employ apprentices indentured to MBA Inc group

training companies. Bui lders and subcontractors can employ apprentices from one

week up to full indenture term without normal administrative overheads.

(e) Legal Services

• MBA Inc has written and published a comprehensive set of contracts and

subcontracts used widely in the building and construction industry. Th ese are for

small building works through to major commercial and civil engineering

construction projects. MBA Inc jointly publi shes contracts with the Royal Australian

Institute of Architects, Standards Australia and the Property Council of Australia.

• It is a member of Standards Australia Contracts Committees and the Joint Contracts Committee.

• MBA Inc publishes 'Advice Notes' and 'Practice Notes' for contracts interpretation,

use and administration .

(0 Superannuation

• MBA Inc holds di rectorships on the superannuation fund, Cbus.

(g) International Division

• MBA Inc International Division provides programs including a trade mission

program and a business matchin g program , which sets up business appointments

for Australian fi rms with potential overseas partners.

• It has a diagnostic program for firms considering exporting, or who have had tro uble entering export markets. It conducts export forums featuring key speakers.

Housing Industry Association

I 01 HIA has approximately 30 000 member businesses. It is the peak national industry association

for businesses in the residential building, renovation and development industry (single,

detached and multidensity). HIA members employ almost 300 000 people, or 3.5 per cent of

the total nati onal workforce. Sales revenue from HIA members totals approximately $33 billion ,

or 4.4 per cent of Australia's gross domestic product. 68

I 02 HIA, as a matter of policy, has not sought to be registered as an industrial association under

Federal or State law. Th is pol icy was adopted so that its members would not automatically be

bou nd as parties to any federal awards 69

I 03 Wh ile HIA is fundamentally an association for the housing industry, it has some experience in

the commercial bui lding area. HIA has supported and assisted many members who have had difficulty working on union-controlled building sites?O

Civil Contractors Federation

104 CC F is a national body with a national office and State and Territory branches, together with

19 regional divisions across Australia 71 CCF is the major representative body of civil

engineering contractors. In 2001 civil engineering contractors throughout Australia were

l 00 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

involved in construction and maintenance work worth approximately $13 000 million. Most of this work involved public infrastructuren

105 CCF represents about 1250 members and 450 associate members. Its members employ more

than 40 000 people.l3

106 Industrial relations matters are handled by both national and state offices. The national office has responsibility for overseeing al l relevant federal award matters, such as award variations in respect of wages and conditions, award simplification, and safety net adjustments 7 4

107 Membership of CCF requires adherence to a code of ethics. It is a condition of membersh ip

that members comply with the following objectives:

(a) Members will not engage in any activities designed to cause injustice or oppression

in the fair and proper execution of such civil construction works as they may

undertake.

(b) Members will endeavour th rough honest and forthright dealings to secure, maintain

and improve favourable trade relations with all public authorities, manufacturers,

suppliers and distributors of goods materials and/or services either within Australia or abroad.

(c) Members will at all times maintain and enhance the reputation for skill, integrity and

responsibility of the members of th e Federation and to ensure the highest

standards of skill, integrity and responsibility expected of members of the Federation.

(d) Members will make all reasonable efforts to maintain and improve relations

between members and their employees with a view to the avoidance of industrial

unrest and strikes, and to take all such s teps as may be considered desirable in the

settlement of strikes and industrial disputation by their employees.

(e) Members will endeavour to secure amongst members all the advantages of unity of

action in any lawful manner whatsoever.

m Members will recognise and behave in accordance with the Federation's code of ethical behaviour for contractors. 75

Nati onal Electrical and Communications Association

1 08 NECA is a national employer organisation registered under the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) . It has about 5500 members, all of whom operate as electrical or communications

contractors, with chapters in each State and Territory. 76

109 The objects of the NECA as stated in its rules include:

(a) To conserve and further the legitimate interests of its members.

(d) To prevent and/or settle disputes between members or between the Organisation

and any employee or body of employees by conciliation and/or other lawful means.

National Perspective Part 1 0

(lj To undertake, defend or intervene in any proceedings in any Court or Commission

of law or arbitration which in the opinion of the Organisation affects or may affect the rights or interests of its members or persons eligible to be members or any of

them. 77

Air Conditioning and Mechanical Contractors' Association

11 0 AMCA members are specialist ai r conditioning and mechanical services contractors who do

not work in the residential building sector. They generally tender to and work for builders78 and

employ plumbers for on-site construction work.

111 At the national level AMCA is a federation of state organisations. Each of the state

organisations is a separately incorporated body, either established as a company limited by

guarantee under the Corporations Law, or alternatively, an incorporated association.

11 2 The objects of its members include:

1. Engage competent highly trained specialists to evaluate the technical reqwrements

of specifications and the technical merits of works and to deliver to the clien t, a project which is correctly engineered, completed on time, within budget and with

minimisation of life cycle costs.

2. Meet all contractual and legal obligations including compliance with releva nt

legislation, Australian Standards and Codes of Practice. This in particular in cludes

those wh ich apply to environmental and health and safety issues.

3. Implement and maintain correct business and management practices, together

with adequate asset backing, to ensure financial accountability and financial

stability

4. Implement the appropriate standards of quality assurance.

5. Encourage education, training and advancement of employees including

apprentices, tradesperson, engineers and administration staff to ensure a

competent and multi-skilled workforce within equal opportunity guidelines. 79

Head contractors

113 The head contractor is responsible for delivering the project on time and within budget,

managing the construction work and co-ordinating the work of the subcontractors supplying

specialist services. Usually, the client will have direct contact only with the head contractor. The

reason for this is the nature of contractual relationships, and fear of attracting liability if the cl ient

intermeddles with subcontractors. As AIG submitted:

Head contractors are not usually the direct employers of the vast majority of labour on a

construction project. Head contractors are responsible for the project overall and th ey typically have a direct contractual relationship with major subcontractors undertaking

packages of work. The subcontractors, in turn, have a contractual relationship with sub­

subcontractors who perform the bulk of the work on a project. 80

1 02 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

114 The Victorian Auditor-General's Office made the following observation in relation to VicRoads:

... VicRoads maintained that its contractual relationships are with the prime contractors. It

explained that it has no contra ctual obligations with sub-contractors who enter into quite

separate and distinct contractual arrangements with the prime contractor. VicRoads also

considers that any direct involvement by it with sub-contractors could result in an

exposure to potential legal action against it by prime contractors in the event of contractual disputes. 81

115 This is a commonly held view.

116 The tight profit margins in the industry have led head contractors to seek avenues to redu ce

risks wherever possible. Head contractors are usually reimbursed if a clie nt causes costs to

rise, for example, by varying the design . Cost increases not attributable to either party are

so metim es shared. For example, del ays caused by inclement weather and industrywide strikes

typically entitle head contractors to time extensions and thus exemption from liquidated

damages . In such cases, some of the costs of extending the project are still borne by the head

contractor. In contrast, head contractors are usually liable for most delay costs when it is

caused by a site-specific dispute. Such a cost is generally sought to be passed down the line

to any relevant subcontractor.

117 The MBA Inc opening submission to the Commission contended that: 'achieving ind ustrial

relations harmony so as to minimise their commercial risks is uppermost in the minds of head

contractors' 8 2

118 Outlin ed in attachment 2 is a descri ption of the 15 head contractors that are ACA mem bers.

Th is does not include all head contractors but it illustrates the type of companies , and their

activities, operating in the building and construction industry.

Subcontractors

119 Subcontracting in the building and construction industry involves any of the following

arrangements:

(a) subcontracting businesses th at employ workers under award and agreement wages and

conditions or sub-subcontract others when needed;

(b) self-employed individual subcontractors who seek work individually (in dependent

subcontractors); or

(c) self-employed individual subcontractors who seek work through employment agencies .

120 Self-employed contracting in the industry takes several forms. Some individuals contract their

labour with tools of the trade to builders and building subcontractors. Other contractors are

supplied by manufacturers with materials such as doors and tiles. A less common arrangement

involves workers who also supply plant and equipment.

121 One iss ue addressed by the Commission is the distinction between employees and

contractors and the implications of this distinction for the rights of workers, the obligations of

employers and the collection of government revenu e. These issues are discussed in the later

vo lumes on national issues reforms.

National Perspective Part 1 I 03

122 Over the past 20 years there has been a steady emergence of non-traditional working

arrangements, including temporary workers such as casual and part-time employees and

subcontractors, and labour hire companies.83 The construction industry is characterised by a

large number of businesses that rely on outsourced work. While the level of subcontracting

appears to be increasing in many industries the use of subcontractors in building and

construction is very high. The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFME U)

stated:

ABS research indicates that the construction industry experiences a higher degree of

contracting and subcontracting than most other industries. In the case of sub­

contracting, the recent White Paper on the construction industry in NSW (July 1998)

estimated that sub-contractors now delivered between 75% and 85% of the product of

the industry. The White Paper suggested that:

• up to 20 specialist skilled sub-contractors are employed on a residential housing

project; and

• up to 200 specialist sub-contractors may be involved on a major construction site.

Th1s indicates that work is organ1sed into small, often ISolated packages. The growth of sub­

contracting has been associated with shorter contract cycles and specialisation. It has been

noted that sub-contractors often lack the necessary business management skills. 84

The nature of the subcontracting sector

123 On large capital city projects there is usually a complex chain of contracts between the cl ient,

head contractors and subcontractors. Management of construction work is performed by the

head contractor. However, most of the construction work is sub-let to subcontractors, who employ aroun d 90 per cent of the workers on site 8 5 Subcontractors may employ workers

under awards or agreement wages and conditions, or independent subcontractors may seek

work individually or through employment agencies 86

124 Subcontractors tend to be small businesses. The building and construction industry has the

fourth largest number of businesses and second lowest number of employees in each

business. 87 In 1999-2000 construction businesses with employees employed an average of

4.6 people88 If businesses with no employees (that is, sole traders) are included, the average

is only 2.5. Of the 194 300 businesses in 1996-97, most were in construction trade servi ces

(158 000 or 81 per cent) with average employment of 2.3 people 89

125 Many subcontractors provide construction trade services, which include specialist trades th at

cover:

(a) site preparation , for example, demolition, earthmoving, land clearing and trench digging;

(b) bui lding structure servi ces , for example, concreting , bricklaying , roofing and structural

steel erection;

(c) installation trade servi ces , for example, plumbing, electri cal, air-conditioning and heating,

and fire and security systems; and

l 04 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(d) building completion services, for example, plastering, carpentry, tiling and carpeting,

painting and decorating, and glazing.

126 Table 7 illustrates the average size and economic characteristics of these businesses.

Table 7

Construction trade services

Units Site Building Installation Building Other Totals

preparation structure trade competition construction

services services services services services

Average employment No. 2.7 2.3 2.9 1.8 2.4 2.3

Average wages $ '000 48 .9 30.4 58.2 14.7 27.6 30.8

and salaries

Averag e turnover $'000 270.2 157.5 260.7 94.6 156.4 159.9

Average income $ '000 274.3 158.9 263.5 96.0 155.2 161 .6

Average operating $'000 251.7 134.8 235.9 71 .9 131.7 136.7

expenses

Average profit $'000 23.5 24.0 27 .9 23.7 23.7 24.8

Average net worth $ '000 46.6 13.8 33.5 19.7 15.4 22.9

Average gross product $'000 111 A 64.1 98.7 41.2 58.9 64.1

Source: ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry: Australia, 1996-97, Cat. no. 8772 .0)

127 Within each of the five areas of construction trade services the ABS data show there are many

small firms and a few large ones. For example, in site preparation services there are 6400 firms

with fewer than five employees (employing 11 600 people) and 1 00 firms with more than 20

employees (employing 2900 people). This pattern is repeated in the other trades. 90

128 Because of the number of firms and the pressure exerted by head contractors the

subcontracting sector is highly competitive .

. . . throughout all levels of the industry, contractors and sub-contractors operate on very

small profit margins. This originates at the top level, where head contractors tender on

the basis of small profit margins or, often, at cost ... . As a result, for a head contractor to

ensure profit at the end of a project, considerable pressure is often applied by the head

contractor with the aim of reducing the castings provided by tendering sub-contractors.

This same process is then replicated down the cha1n of sub-sub-contractors. 91

Level of subcontracting

129 The buildi ng and constructi on industry has currently more owner managers and own account

workers than any other industry (charts 15 and 16). There were 341 000 owner managers in

National Perspective Part 1 1 05

bu ilding and construction in November 2001 9 2 This comprised both incorporated and

unincorporated enterprises. In particular, the number of unincorporated businesses with owner

managers was 234 000; more than any other industry. These numbers included housing

developments where there were a large number of unincorporated businesses.

Chart 15

Number of owner managers of enterprises, November 2001 ('000)

350

300

250

200 175 1-----------1

150

100

50

0

Ol c

:.c

""

Ol c

c

:2

>­ Q_ Q. :::J

I D c "'

c: 0

:;:;

" 2 tl c: 0 (..)

Owner managers of incorporated enterprises

Owner managers of unincorporated

- c

"'"' u :::J :;:::; Q)

"' uu 0 c E ro E 0 () :t

Q)

[? 0

u; D c

"' t 0 Q. Vl c "' F

Q) ()

c

:::J

c

"' c "' c u::

148

gJ '-' "2: ill

gJ c

·v; :::J .D D

c

"' £ Q) Q. e 0..

c Q)

0 '-'

:;:::; c

Q)

E c

D ro

"' c Q) E c 0

Source: ABS 2002 (Forms of Employment: Australia, Sept 2002, Cat. no. 6359.0)

130 The Australian Bureau of Statistics defines an own account worker as:

c

0

'-' :::J D w

'-' 2: ill c

c :::J E E 0 '-' D c "' £ Cll Q) I

A person who operates his or her own unincorporated economic enterprise or engages

independently in a profession or trade, and hires no employees (this category was formerly entitled self employed). 93

131 Based on ABS statistics on own account workers, in August 2002, 30 per cent of the

workforce in the building and construction industry were independent contractors, compared with ten per cent of the workforce nationally94

1 06 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 16

Number of labour force classified as own account workers, August 2002 ('000)

250

206.5

200 1------ - ---

150

100

50

0

Ol c

E

Ol c

"§ t5 .!'! :J

c

"' 2

>-a. 0. :J

c

0

:;::; (.)

s

ro Q) a:

w ­ - c "'"' (.) c- 2 0

Ol l"

0

U5 D c

"' t 0 0.

2' Q)

c

0

(.)

·c :J

E E 8

Q) (.)

c

l"

:J

.,; D c

"' Q) (.) c "' c u:::

2' Q)

c

·u; :J

.D D c

"' € Q) 0. e Q..

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force: Australia, Aug 2002 , Cat. no. 6203.0)

c Q)

0 (.)

:;:;::; c

(15 Q)

E c

D CO

"' c Q) E c (.')

c

0

(.)

:J

C3

2' Q)

c

c :J E E 0 (.) D § £ 1E I

2' Q)

Q; .c

0

D c

"' ro c 0 l" Q) Q..

132 The number of own account workers in the construction in dustry increased by 75 900 between

May 1985 and May 2002. ABS reports show that this is a much higher rise, both in percentage and

absolute terms, than for any other industry.95 From May 1985 to May 2002 the number of

independent contractors in the building and construction industry grew by 60 per cent, compared

wi th 23 per cent growth nationally across all industries% The nu mber of own account workers rose

significantly from May 2000 as is shown in chart 17. This narrowly preceded the introduction of the

GST in July 2000 and the Sydney Olympics in September 2000.

National Perspective Part 1 1 07

Chart 17

Number of own account workers- 1985 to 2002. ('000)

250

200

150

Agriculture, forestry, and fish ing (01 1-042)

Retail trade (51 1-532)

Construction (411-425)

Average for all industries

..... ---

198.4 '"'"""..- ..............

---, ..... ___ _

112.4

100

73.7

50

U) CD '- 0) m 0 o; N co

.,. U) CD '- ro m 0 0 ro ro ro ro ro 0> m m m m m m m m 0 m m m 2' m Q) m m m 2' m m m m m 0 0 N N "' "' "' ;., ;., ;., ;., ;., ;., ;., <1l <1l "' "' <1l OJ "' "' <1l "' "' "' "' "' "' <1l <1l 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

201.8

165.0

101.3

9 1. 0

N 0

0

N

"' 2

Source : ABS 2002 (6291. 0.40 .001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed- Australia- Quarterly- Labour Force-Own Account Workers- Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6291 .0)

133 Finally, the prevalence of subcontractors in the building and construction industry does not

appear to be localised to one State or Territory, as shown in chart 18.

1 08 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 18

Number of own account workers by State and Territory ('000) - August 2002

• Constructio n D State Average per industry (All industries)

80

70

603

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

0.7

NSW Vic Old SA WA Tas NT ACT

Source: ABS 2002 (6291 .0.40.001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed -Australia- Quarterly- Labour Force­ Own Account Workers- Tables 1 c), 2c) 3c), 4c), 5c), 6c), 7c) , 8c), Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6291.0)

Labour hire companies

134 Labour hire firms operate by supplying labour to other companies, their 'clients'. Workers

employed by labour hire firms typically contact the labour hire firm to determine availability of

work. Workers are usually paid an hourly rate and are hired on a casual basis. There are three

operational models for labour hire firms.

• The first involves labour hire firms hiring self employed workers to clients. This model was

adopted by the labour hire firm Troubleshooters. Clients pay an hourly rate for labour, which includes a commission with an 'all in' rate paid to the worker. Under this model,

workers are responsible for all their own costs, including taxation, workers compensation and superannuation. There is no award based regulation under this model . Empl oyees

are not protected under standard employment contracts. Under this model the worker is

not employed by either the labour hire company or the client.

• The second form of labour hire involves the client of the labour hire firm employing a

worker as a 'temp' or 'agency' worker. The worker becomes a casual or temporary

employee of the firm where he or she is sent. The firm in return pays a commission, often

a percentage of the hourly wage, to the labour hire firm . The client bears normal empl oye r

responsibilities for the temporary employee such as abiding by employment regu lation (for example award conditions) with respect to wages, conditions and payroll tax. This

form of labour hire is usual ly related to white collar employment.

National Perspective Part 1 1 09

• The third form of labour hire involves a labour hire firm itself employing workers but

contracting their services to the 'client' firm. A commercial contract exists between the

labour hire firm and the 'client' firm . Employees are paid an hourly rate by the labour hire

firm but work under the direction of the client firm. The workers remuneration and

conditions (such as superannuation and long service leave) are subject to award

conditions or to an agreement negotiated with the labour hire company97 Under this

model the worker is an employee of the labour hire firm.

Unions

135 Trade unions are periodically formed to utilise the collective strength of the membership to

counterbalance the power of employers. The principal unions operating within the scope of my

Terms of Reference are:

• The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU);

• The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and

Al li ed Services Union of Austral ia (CEPU);

• The Australian Workers' Union (AWU);

• The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering , Printing and Kindred Industries Un ion,

referred to as the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU).

136 The CFMEU is the largest and most active union on large building projects. It also operates on some civil construction sites. 98

137 The CEPU is the second major union representing employees on large capital city building

projects, its members are involved in electrical, plumbing and roofing activities. The AWU 's

pri ncipal area of coverage in the in dustry is on civi l construction projects, such as tunnels,

bridges and road making. The AMWU has coverage of civi l construction sites, for workers in

metals and engineering manufacturing 99

138 A summary of the governance arrangements and objects of all major unions in the bu ilding and

construction industry is included at attachment 3.

Membership

139 The level of union membership varies between different sectors within the building and

construction industry. Anecdotal information is supported by evidence gathered by the

Commission indicating that union membership is much higher on large inner-city construction

sites than it is in the construction of single dwellings.

140 Mr Andrew Ferguson, the New South Wales state secretary for the CFMEU stated:

Let's say in the central business district, there is a higher level of union membership,

there's higher levels of expectation by workers in relation to union agreements. 100

141 In 1999, the Productivity Commission Report found uni on membership on large CBD bu ilding

projects to be 'almost 1 00%' .101 The evidence before this Commission supports this finding.

11 0 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

142 Chart 19 shows the general trend of declining membership of trade unions across all industries.

Creighton and Stewart confirm that membership of unions in Australia has dropped

significantl y. 102 Over the years shown, the proportion of trade union membership in the

construction industry has been sim il ar to that for all industries. In the two years to August 2000

there was a rise in the number of trade union members in the construction industry, from

1 00 600 to 116 200. Th is fell to 106 800 by August 2001. The proportion of trade union

members in building and construction and nationally for all industries at August 2001 was the

same at 24.5 per cent (chart 20). However, as the single dwelling sector, where unionisation is

low, is not within my Terms of Reference, these figures understate the proportion of employees

with union membership for those sectors of the industry under review by the Commission .

143 As at August 2001 a higher proportion of fu lltime employees (29 per cent) than part-time

employees (11 per cent) were trade union members in the building and constru ction industry.

Across all industries a much higher proportion of female employees were trade union members

(23 per cent) than in building and construction (4 per cent). 103

Chart 19

Union membership comparing percentage share in construction indust ry with all ind ustries, August 1992 to August 2001

50 ,---------------------------------------------------------------,

- Construction - - All industries

20 r---------------------------------------------------------------

10 r---------------------------------------------------------------

1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Source: ABS 2002 (Australia Now, Construction, Union Membership, Jan 2002)

Note: These numbers represent a proportion of union members surveyed at an appointed time during August of each year.

National Perspective Part 1 i i i

Chart 20

Union membership by industry, August 2001

50

40

Q)

30 Cl <1l c Q) 2 Q) 20 c.. 10

0

OJ c

E 2

D c

"' c Ui .2

[Ll

E ::J u <(

48.3

30.8 30.4

c: .Q t5 s Vl c 0 (.)

(JJ

ro Vl

(JJ

0

L

s

38.6 39 .3

(JJ Ol l"

0

Ui D c

"' t 0 0. Vl c

22.3

c

l" ::J (/) .S D c "' (JJ u c "' c i.L

c <])

0 u

-.;:::; c

E c uro "'

43.6

Vl

<]) u

'2' <]) (/)

.c ·c: ::J E E 0 u D c "' £ m I

(/)

(JJ u

2' (JJ (/)

0

D c:

"' ro c 8

24.5

Source: ABS 2002 (Employee earnings, benefits and trade union membership, Aug 2001: Au stralia, Cat . no. 6310.0)

144 According to Creighton and Stewart, the Australian Council of Trade Union 's (ACTU) res ponse

to the decline in union membership has been two-fold . 'One strategy has focused on

recruitment, with affiliates being encouraged not just to be active in targeting industries or types

of worker where organi sation has been weak , but to improve and expand the services to

members. Secondly, the ACTU committed itself in the !ate 1980s to restru cturin g the union

movement into larger, better-resourced units, setting a target of around 20 ind ustry-oriented

"groupings" for its affiliates' .1 04

145 According to Mr William Shorten, the National Secretary of Th e Australian Workers Uni on, the

'high rate of job casualisation , now accounting for more than 30 per cent of all Au stral ian jobs, has not helped unions arrest membership decline' .105

Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union

146 CFM EU resulted from a series of amalgamations during the 1 990s, with separate unions

amalgamating along industry lines to form each of the divisions of CFMEU .106 CFMEU was

formed in 1992, with much of the membership and officials of the Construction and General

11 2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Division coming from the former Building Workers' Industrial Union and the Bui lders' Labourers' Federation.

Objects

147 The relevant objects of CFMEU are set out in attachment 3. CFMEU sees its core

responsibilities as the wages, working conditions and safety of building workers .10 7 Key objects

of the CFMEU include:

Structure

1. To uphold the right of combination of labour, and to improve, protect, and foster

the best interests of the Union and its members, and to assist them to obtain their

rights under industrial and social legislation;

2. To regulate the conditions under which all members of the Union may be

employed;

3. To affiliate to, federate with, amalgamate with, or otherwise combine with any trade

or industrial Union, or association, or association of Trade Unions or any other

organisation having objects similar in whole or in part to the objects of this Union. 108

148 The CFMEU is a reg istered organisation under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) with

three main divisions:

• The Construction and General Division

• The Forest, Furnishing, Building Products and Manufacturing Division (which includes the

FFTS Division , which was restructured into the Forestry Division as of 11 February 2002 109)

• The Mining & Energy Division;

and two transitional divisions:

• The Furniture Division

• The FEDFA Division (FEDFA).

149 The Construction and General Division and the FEDFA are the primary divisions with members

involved in building and construction .

150 The Construction and General Division has nine Divisional Branches: one each in New South

Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australi a, Western Australia and the ACT; two in Queensland

(CFMEU Construction and General Division , Queensland Construction Labourers' Divisional

Branch and CFMEU Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers

Divisional Branch); and the Clay and Ceramics Industry Divisional Branch .110

151 The Clay and Ceramics Industry Divisional Branch is not further discussed.

152 The Divisional Branches in New South Wales , South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania and

the ACT are named 'The Construction and General Division, X Divisional Branch' where X is the

State or Territory concerned . The Victorian Divisional Branch is named 'The Construction and

General Division, Victorian Building Unions Divisional Branch' .111

National Perspective Part 1 11 3

Financial p ro file

153 The financial analysis of each union is further explained in attachment 1. The financ ial

information included in the following profile, and others below, does not account for state

registered organisations. In brief, the Construction and General Division of CFMEU had total

assets of $54.9 million for the year ending 31 December 2000. 112 Its total liabilities were

$10 million for the same period. 113 It thus had net assets of $44.8 million. 114

154 The Construction and General Division recorded total income from membership subscriptions

of $22.1 million for the year ending 31 December 2000. 115

Size and membership

155 CFMEU has offices in all capital cities in Australia and in many major regional centres. The union

employs approximately 400 fulltime staff and officials. 116 It has more than 1500 elected

delegates or shop stewards on construction projects throughout Australia. 117

156 On 3 April 2002 CFMEU declared to the Australian Industrial Commission that it had 11 0 000

members and employees or independent contractors. 118 However, Sutton's statement dated

21 June 2002 said that the CFMEU had more than 150 000 members across all divisions and

that it is the largest of the unions, in terms of the number of members, working in the building

and construction industry. Membership of the Construction and General Division is claimed to

be about 100 000. 11 9

157 CFMEU covers building tradespeople (including bricklayers, carpenters, plasterers, painters),

skilled non-trades construction workers (crane drivers, steel fixers, operators), and

construction labourers and trades' assistants. It has members who work in brick, tile and

pottery manufacturing and in furnishing trades. 120

158 CFMEU Rules and the Rules for the Construction and General Division define a person 's

eligibility for membership to that division. 121 Under CFMEU Rules, 'A member shall be attached

to the Division of the union covering the industry or employment of the member and shall be in

only one such Division'. 122 CFMEU Rules provide that 'the Union may reach agreement with

any organisation of employees, trade union, industrial organisation, whether incorporated or

otherwise or whether registered under a law of the Commonwealth, State or Territory or

unregistered' that provides for automatic membership of the CFMEU for members of any such

association. 123 The CFMEU can waive the requirement for an entrance fee or whole or part

contributions for members of other associations.

State employee organisations

159 In each state, apart from Victoria, there are organisations of employees registered under state

industrial relations legislation which are the state-based equivalents of CFMEU, or one of its

Divisions. The CFMEU Rules allow for members of state registered unions to be members of

both the organisation registered under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) and the state

registered union. A number of senior officials in CFMEU are senior officials in a state registered

organisation. For example, Mr Peter Boden Zaboyak is an Assistant Secretary of both the

Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch of the CFMEU (federally registered), and of the Construction and General Division of the Construction.

Forestry, Min ing, and Energy Union (NSW Branch) (state registered).

11 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and All ied Services Union of Australia

160 The Communications, Electrical, Electronic , Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia (C EPU) was established in 1994, as a resu lt of the amalgamation of

ten unions between 1988 and 1994. The major unions forming the CEPU were regi stered

federa lly from 1912. They were preceded by colonial organisations which had existed prior to

1901 . Th e main amalgamation to form the CEPU was between the Electrical and Plumbing Union and the Communication Workers Union in 1994.124

Objects

161 Key objects of the CEPU include (see attachment 3) :

Structure

3. 1 To enrol in the Union persons eligible to be members.

3.2 To advance the interests of members and secure a proper classification structure

with appropriate rates of pay

3.3 To ensure adequate training is available for members including the maintenance of

the principles of the apprenticeship system.

3. 4 To ensure that award rates of pay and other provisions adequately reflect the

training and skills of members. 12s

162 CEPU is registered under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). Th e Ru les of CEPU

provide for three divisions:

• the Communications Division;

• the Electrical Division (also known as the Electrical Trad es Union Division 126); and

• the Pl umbing Division (also known as the PGEU Divis ion121) .

163 The Communications Division is not further discussed.

164 The Electrical Division is often referred to by its members and other persons as the 'ETU'.

165 The CEPU Rules provide for the creation of Divisional Branches of the Electrical and Plumbin g

Divisions. In the case of the Electrical Division, there are Divisional Branches in all States,

except Victoria and Tasman ia; and in the Northern Territory. The members of the union in

Victoria and Tasmania are deemed a singl e Divisional Branch. 128 In the case of the Plumbing

Division, there are branches in each State and the Australian Capital Territory. 129

166 Th e Electrical Division makes provision in its rules for the creation of Sub-Branches by a Divisional State Councii. 13D

167 Each Division is autonomous on matters wh ich affect only that Division and each has its own

set of rules , as does the nati onal organisation. 131 Th e Electrical Division and the Pl umbing

Division 's rules are set out in Section B and C respectively of th e CEPU Rules.

168 The NSW Divisional Branch of the Electrical Division has its own set of registered rules, wh ich

are set out in Section B2 of the CEPU Rules. These rules provide that matters specified in the

National Perspective Part 1 11 5

NSW Divis ional Branch Rules prevail over any inconsistent provision in Section B, Divisional

Rules of the Electrical Divisiona! Rules of the CEPU .132

Financial profile

169 In brief, the Electrical Division's total assets for the year end ing 31 December 2000 were

$35.7 mi llion .133 The Plumbing Division had total assets of $6.3 million for the financial year ending 31 March 2001 .134

170 The Electrical Division's total liabilities for the period ending 31 December 2000 were

$11 .4 million .135 For the year ending 31 March 2001, the Plumbing Division recorded total

liabilities of $2 .1 million. 136 The net assets of the Electrical Division were thus $24.3 million, 137

and the Plumbing Division $4.2 million .138

171 For the year ending 31 December 2000 income generated by the Electrical Division totalled

$11.9 million .139

172 The Plumbing Division, excluding the National Office, received $3.2 million in membership

contributions and entrance fees in the year ending 31 March 2001, 140 with the National Office

receiving contributions of $686 000.141 Other income for the Plumbing Division totalled

$1.2 million; with combined income $4.4 million (see attachment 1) .142

Size and mem b ership

173 The CEPU has more than 170 000 members working across various industries. 143 Members

have job classifications in communications, electrical and electronic, information technology,

postal, plumbing and allied areas. Each member of the Union is attached to the division of the

Union covering the industry or employment of that member.144 A member is only in one division

or one divisional branch. 145

17 4 Rule 2 of the CEPU Rules sets out eligibility for membership.

175 A characteristic of CEPU membership is that it is skilled, in both the Electrical and Plumbing

Divisions . Members need to have appropriate qualifications. A concern about training and

qualifications is reflected in the objects of the union.

State employee organisations

176 In New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia there are two separate state registered

organisations which cover electrical trades and plumbers and gasfitter employees. Weste rn

Australia has a state registered organisation for plumbers and gasfitters employees, and the

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Al lied

Workers Union of Australia, Engineering and Electrical Division, WA Branch. Tasmania has one

state registered organisation named the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energ y,

Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. In Victoria, there are no state registered organisations.

177 There is no provision in the Ru les of the CEPU , or the Rules of the CEPU Electrical Division or

Plumbing Divisions, deeming membership of the CEPU to be membership of an equivalent

state registered organisation. The Rules of the NSW Divisional Branch of the Electrical Divis ion

of the CEPU , allow for the interchange of membership, and state that financial members of

11 6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

kindred unions may, at the discretion of the Divisional State Council and or State Divisional

Branch Executive, be admitted to membership of the NSW Divisional Branch of the Electrical

Division of the CEPU , without payment of ent rance fees, if they are ful ly paid up members of the other union .146

Australian Workers' Union

178 The Australian Workers' Union was form ed in 1894, having been origi nally formed in 1886 as

the Amalgamated Shearers Union .147 In 1993 the AWU amalgamated with the Federation of

Industrial, Man ufactu ring and Engineering Empl oyees (FIM EE). FIM EE was formed in July 199 1

as an amalgamation of the Federated Ironworkers' Association of Australia and th e

Australasian Society of Engineers, which subsequently amalgamated, in November 1992, with

the Am algamated Society of Carpenters and Joi ners of Australia. All of these em ployee organisations had eligibility in the construction industry.148

Objects

179 Key objects of the AWU include (see attachment 3):

• To uphold the rights of combination of labour and to improve, protect and foster the best

interests of its members and to assist them to obtain their rights under industrial and

social legislation;

• To regulate and protect the conditions of labour, the relations between workers and

between workers and employers. To regulate conditions on the conduct of trade,

business or industry of the members;

• To endeavour by political action to secure social justice;

• To establish one union for Australian workers.149

Structure

180 The AWU is an organisation registered under the Workplace Rela tio ns Act 1996 (C'wth) . Its

Rules provide that it is divided into nine geographically based branches :

• Greater New South Wales Branch

• Newcastle and Northern Regions Branc h

• Port Kembla, South Coast and Southern Highlands Branch

• Queensland Branch

• Greater South Australian Branch

• Whyalla- Woomera Bran ch

• Tasmania Branch

• Victoria Branch

• West Australia Branch ;

and three specific industry branches:

National Perspective Part 1 i i 7

• Technical, Administrative, Professional Staff and Gas Industry

• Glass and Container Industry Branch

• Tobacco Workers Branch. 150

181 The Newcastle and Northern Regions Branch has 11 Sub-Branches. 151 The Queensland

Branch has seven districts, which are geographically based, with the exception of the Metals

and Construction Sub-Branch. 152 Each of the Techn ical, Administrative, Professional Staff and

Gas Industry, Glass and Container Industry and Tobacco Workers Branches have

Sub-Branches defined geographically by state. 153

182 The Rules provide that a Branch functions as a single unit of the union. It may be divided who lly

into Sub-Branches on a job, industry or locality basis. It can be divided into Districts. 154

183 Two or more Branches may form a Division, subject to the approval of the National Conference

or the National Executive. 155

184 The Ru les establish Industry Committees of representatives which include Civil and Mechanical

Engineering Construction, and Building and Construction. The Committees are constituted by

representatives as determined by the National Executive and must meet at least annually. 156

The rep resentatives may include Officers or employees of the union . The Committees have

advisory powers only. Such pow8rs are determined by the National Executive .157

Financial profile

185 The federally registered AWU recorded combined total assets of $27.9 million for the year

ending 30 June 2001. 158 Total liabilities for the financial year ending 30 June 2001 for the

federally registered AWU equalled $15.6 million. 159 The National Office had liabilities for that

period accounting for 54 per cent of the total, far in excess of those of any geographically­

based branch. 160

186 Thus, for the year ending 30 June 2001 the net assets of the federally reg istered AWU totalled

$12.3 million. 161

187 The combined income for the National office and all the Branches of the federally registered

AWU was $29.2 million which included $2.4 million in non -core income for the year ending

30 June 2001 (see attachment 1 ). 162

Size and membership

188 The AWU has over 100 000 members. Ru le 5 of the AWU sets out eligibility for membership.

Any person applying for membership of the union must be admitted if they meet the eligibility

criteria. 163 The State Secretary of the Victorian Branch of the AWU, described the rule as 'long

and complex and there are a number of exclusions or qualifications relating to the AWU's

eligibility in the Buil ding and Construction Industry' .164

189 The AWU covers workers involved in:

• the construction, repair, maintenance or demolition of:

(i) Civil and or mechanical engineering projects,

11 8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(v) Sports or entertainment complexes and car parks excepting car park

buildings and car parks within the alignment of a building.

• all operations incidental to road making, water and sewerage, railway construction

work, pipeline construction (excluding welders) and in the manufacture or

preparation, applying, laying or fixing of bitumen emulsion, bitumen or asphalt preparations, manufacture of cement articles. 165

State employee organisations

190 The signing of an application form for membership of the AWU in a 'designated State

Branch' 166 constitutes an application for membership of the union and is deemed to be an

application for membership, in the case of each State Branch, of the appropriate state union

with constitutional coverage. For example, a worker applying to join the Whyalla-Woomera

Branch of the AWU is deemed additionally to be an applicant for the Australian Workers' Union

(Whyalla-Woomera Branch) Association of Employees, which is an association of employees

registered under the provisions of the Industrial and Employees Relations Act 1994 (SA).

Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union

191 The AMWU evolved through a series of amalgamations over the last 150 years. The most

recent amalgamations have been:

• In 1991 the Amalgamated Metal Workers' Union amalgamated with the Association of

Draughting Supervisory, and Technical Employees to form the Metals and Engineering Workers ' Union.

• In 1 993 the Metals and Engineering Workers' Union amalgamated with the Vehicle Builders Employees Federation of Australia to form the Automotive, Metals and

Engineering Union .

• In 1 994 the Automotive, Metals and Engineering Union amalgamated with the

Confectionery Workers and Food Preservers Union of Australia to form the Automotive, Food, Metals and Engineering Union.

• In 1 995 the Automotive, Food, Metals and Engineering Union amalgamated with the

Printing and Kindred Industries Union to form the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering,

Printing and Kindred Industries Union {the AFMEPKIU, also known as the AMWU). 167

192 There have been no further amalgamations since 1995.

Objects

193 Key objects of the AMWU include (see attachment 3):

• The contro l of industry in the interests of the community;

• The organi sation of all workers qualified for membership, the development of the most

cordial relations with other unions in the industry with a view to bringing into existence of

one union for the found ry, engineering, ship-building and kindred trades, and the

obtaining and maintaining of just and proper hours of work, rates of wages, and

conditions of labour;

National Perspective Part 1 i i 9

• The negotiation and settlement of differences and disputes between the members of the

union and employers by col lective bargaining and agreement, withdrawal of labour or otherwise. 168

Structure

194 The AMWU is a registered organisation under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). The

Rules of the 'Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union '

(AMWU Rules) provide that the union consists of metals and engineering members, 169 and the following divisions :

• Technical and Supervisory Division;

• the Vehicle Division;

• the Food and Confectionery Division; and

• the Printing Division. 170

I 95 None of the above Divisions is further discussed. The metals and engineering members are

those primarily involved in bu ilding and construction, although some members of the Techn ical and Supervisory Division are involved. 171

I 96 There is a State Branch of the AMWU in every state. Each consists of metals and engineering

members and some or al l of the Divisions. For example, the Secretary of the Western Australian

Branch of the AMWU, stated that his branch consists of the Technical and Supervisory Divisi on

and the Printing Division and metal and engineering members. He stated that the metal an d

engineering members are 'widely referred to as the Metal Division although no such Division

formally exists under the Rules of the AMWU'. He noted that the metal and engineerin g

members were formerly members of the Amalgamated Metal Workers Union. 172

Financia l profile

I 97 The AMWU National Council accounts recorded total assets of $57.6 million for the ye ar

ending 30 September 2001 ,173 a significant portion of which is land and buildings held by the

AMWU . The accounts recorded property at cost, and after depreciation, of $38.3 million for the

year ending 30 September 2001 H 4 For the year ending 30 September 2001 the National Council's net assets were $37.3 millionH5

I 98 The AMWU National Council General Fund received income of $35.9 million for the year endi ng

30 September 2001 H 6 This income comprised approximately $30.2 million in membership

contributions and a further $5.7 mill ion from other sources, primarily rent ($4.8 million) (see attachment 1). m

Size and membership

199 Members elect AMWU officials and organisers:

to organise and assist the unions on job delegates to represent members 1n a wide range

of industrial matters ... The Union has 7,000 shop stewards and Job Delegates throughout Australia whose main function is to provide leadership to members 1 n the

120 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

workplace. They also provide a link between the members and the formal structure of the Union.

The AMWU employs full-time Health and Safety Officers to check workplaces, inform

members on health hazards, monitor working environments, enforce acceptable

standards and improve safety on the job ... The AMWU employs Workers' Compensation

Officers to help members with their compensation claims. 178

200 The National Secretary of the AMWU stated on 8 October 2002 that the AMWU now represents over 160 000 workers. 179

201 Rule 1 of the AMWU Rules sets out eligibility for membership of the union. The eligibility rules

for metals and engineering members are in Rule 1 sub-rules 1 A, 1 B and 1 D of these Rules and

include other persons eligible for membership of the union who are not allocated to any of the Divisions. 180

State employee organisations

202 In Western Australia and Tasmania there are state registered organisations called the

Automotive, Food , Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union of Workers -Western Australian Branch; and the Automotive, Food , Metals, Engineering, Printing and

Kindred Industries Union respectively. There is a federally based Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union in South Australia which does not have

separately registered 'state' rules, but is governed by its federally registered rules. Other states do not have state registered organisations.

Role of the Australian Council of Trade Unions and trades and labour councils

203 The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) is made up of 46 affiliated unions representing

around 1.8 million workers. 181 In 1981 the ACTU merged with the Council of Australian

Government Employees' Associations and since then has been 'the sole peak council for the Australian trade union movement' .182

204 Creighton and Stewart are of the view that 'this has given it an enormous advantage relative to

its counterparts in many other countries, where there are competing peak councils organised

by reference to political affiliation, sectarian loyalties, etc. It has given it a crucial strategic

advantage relative to business. '183

205 The ACTU plays an important role in the operation of the industrial relations system - 'for

example, by representing affiliates before State tribunals and the AIRC; helping fund important

legal proceedings; coordinating presentations for national wage hearings and for other

significant test cases; and representing the union movement in consultation with the federal

government over industrial relations legislation' .184

206 As well as fulltime officers, the ACTU employs specialist advisers in occupational health and

safety and international and trade union training areas .

207 ACTU uses democratic processes for establishing its policies and making its most important

operational decisions. These processes involve the ACTU Executive which consists of

National Perspective Part 1 1 21

approximately 50 people and meets three times a year, and the Congress, representing all

ACTU affiliates, which consists of approximately 800 delegates who meet every three years. 185

208 There is a branch of the ACTU in each State and Territory. The State and Territory branches are

as fol lows:

• Australian Capital Territory Trades and Labor Council;

• Labor Council of New South Wales;

• Northern Territory Trades & Labor Council;

• Queensland Council of Unions;

• Unions Tasmania;

• Unions WA;

• United Trades & Labor Council of South Australia; and

• Victorian Trades Hall Council. 186

The workforce

209 In August 2002, 692 800 people were employed in the building and construction industry. Of

these 593 I 00 (86 per cent) were full time and 99 700 (14 per cent) were part time; 241 600

were employed in general construction and 451 200 in construction trade services. Of the total

figure of 692 800, 441 I 00 (64 per cent) were employees, 41 600 (six per cent) were employers

and 206 500 (30 per cent) were 'own account workers'. 187

210 General construction includes the construction, alteration, renovation and repair of buil di ngs

and engineering construction projects. It encompasses assembly, erection or in stallation of

prefabricated buildings or engineering construction works.

2 11 Construction trade services include specialist trades that cover, for example:

• site preparation, inclu ding earthmoving work such as levelling of construction sites,

excavation of foundations, trench digging and removal of overburden;

• building structure services, including concreting, bricklaying, roofing and structural steel

erection;

• installation trade services, including plumbing, electrical, air conditioning and heating and

fire and security systems; and

• building completion services, including plastering , carpentry, tiling and carpeting , painting

and decorating, and glazing. 188

21 2 These ABS data are aggregated and cover the whole of the construction industry, including

single dwellings, which is not part of my Terms of Reference. Work in the domestic sector of the

construction industry accounted for 26 per cent of building and construction activity in

2001-02. 189 It is not possible to separate workforce statistics for the building of sin gle

dwellings.

122 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Size of the workforce

21 3 As il lu strated in charts 21 and 22 , New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland employed the

largest proportion of workers in th e building and construction indu stry. The majority of the

workforce in each State and Territory is employed in construction trade services, rather than general construction work.

Chart 21

Employment in the building and construction industry in each State and Territory, August 2002 ('000)

Tas NT ACT

12.0 6.0 9.5

Vic 183.0

Source: ABS 2002 (Employment time series, Sept 2002, 6291 .0.40.001 labour force - Employed - Industry­ Au stralia - Quarterly)

National Perspective Part 1 123

Chart 22

Employment by building and construction industry sectors in each State and

Territory, August 2002 ('000)

Construction Trade Services • General Construction

250

200

141.3

111.6

150

100

50

0

NSW Vic Old

34.9 9.1

SA

55.9

WA

7.9

4.1

Tas

5.1 0.9

NT

5.8 3.7

ACT

Source : ABS 2002 (Employment time series, Sept 2002, 6291 .0.40.001 labour force - Employed- Industry ­ Australia - Quarterly)

214 Employment in the build ing and construction industry is not constant Chart 23 shows the numbers of people employed in the bui lding and construction industry for each quarter

between August 2000 and August 2002. It features a peak in numbers just before the Sydney

Olympics in September 2000, with a subsequent decline in the ensuing months. The rec ove ry

in numbers seemed to take about a year, and by November 2001 the number of people

employed by the industry had almost returned to the pre -Olympic figure . The August 2002

figure shows the number employed has again declined.

I 2 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 23

Numbers of employed people in construction industry at quarterly intervals, August

2000 to August 2002 ('000)

740

720.7

720

700

680

660

640

620

600

0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

N N N

8 0 0 0 0 0J 0J 0J 0J 0J 0J N N N

t5 Qj c >- t5 Qj <1l ::> .0 <1l :;;; ::> .0 Ol E ::> Ol E ::> n ::> <(

c >- t5 <1l <1l 2 ::> 2 Ol .0 ::>

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force, Aug 2002: Australia , Cat. no. 6203.0)

Employment types

215 The majority of the workforce are employed as tradespersons or related workers (table 8) .

National Perspective Part 1 125

Table 8

Employment in the building and construction industry by occupation, August 2002

Occupation Employees Percentage

('000) of total

Managers and administrators 52 .4 8

Professionals 15.7 2

Associate professionals 36.6 5

Tradespersons and related workers 354.8 51

Advanced clerical and service workers 37.3 5

Intermediate clerical sales and service workers 32.7 5

Intermediate production and transport workers 65.5 9

Elementary clerical sales and service workers 4.0

Labourers and related workers 93.9 14

Total workers 692 .8 100

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force, Sept 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 6203.0)

216 These figures do not divide tradespersons and related workers into the various trades involved in

the building and construction industry. Some indication of the different types of tradespeople

working in the industry can be ascertained from the ABS Private Sector Construction Industry

Survey 1996-97, which provided data about the number of different types of businesses that

constitute construction trade services and the average number of employees per business. The

total number of operating businesses and employee numbers in each of the construction trade

services are set out in table 9.

Table 9

Total operating businesses and numbers of employees- construction trade services, 1996-97

Construction Trade Services Operating Employee

Businesses Totals

('000) ('000)

Site Preparation Services 7.1 19.2

Bu ilding Structure Services 28.7 67. 1

Installation Trade Services 38.9 114.0

Bui lding Completion Services 70.1 125.7

Other Construction Services 13.2 30.9

Total Construction Trade Services Businesses 158.0 356.9

Source: ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97: Australia Cat. no . 8772 .0)

1 26 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Size of employer

217 As noted above, the building and construction industry is made up of mostly small businesses.

In 1996-97, 94 per cent of businesses employed less than fi ve people. 190

218 Across Australia, the average number of employees per business is between 2 and 2.6 (chart

24) . Th is further demonstrates that the majority of the workforce is employed in small

businesses. There is lower average employment for each business reported in the smaller

jurisdictions, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and Northern Territory, and higher than

average employment for each business in Western Australia.

Chart 24

Average number of employees in building and construction businesses in each State and Territory, 1996-97

3.0

2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4

2.6

2.5 -

2.5

2.2 2.1 - 2.0 2.0 1-- r- '-- - i 1.5 - 1-- 1-- - - 1-- - 1--; •••••••••••• - 1-- 1-- - -__:____ -j 1-- .. 1.0 0.5 - - r- - - - -0.0 ill NSW Vic Old SA WA Tas NT ACT Total Source: ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97: Australia Cat. no. 8772.0) Age of workers 219 The age of employees in the building and construction industry is similar to that in several other industries. In August 2002 the number of young employees was slightly less than the national average (chart 25). However, there were still 11 other industries where the proportion of workers in the 15 to 24 age bracket was less than the 13 per cent for the building and construction. Similarly, at 54 per cent the proportion of workers in the building and construction industry in the 25 to 44 age group was higher than the national average of 49 per cent. There were still a significant number of industries where the proportion of workers in this age group was higher than building and construction. The number of older workers in the bui lding an d constru ction industry, 45 years and over, was 31 per cent compared to the national average of 32 per cent. 191 National PerspectiVe Part 1 I 2 7

220 The early peak in chart 25 for the construction industry curve shows that generally the average

age of workers may be slightly lower than in other industries. Chart 26 shows that it is not vastly

different from the national averages.

Chart 25

Age spread of employed persons in selected industries, August 2002

40

-- Mining Manufacturing Construction Retail trade Transport and storage

35

30

"'

25

Ol c

"' l::' 20

"' a.

15

10

5

0

55 and over

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force: Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6203.0}

Chart 26

Age spread of employed persons in all industries, August 2002

30

-- Construction Total workers

25

20

"' Ol "' c Q)

l::' 15 Q) a.

10

5

0

19 55 and over

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force: Australta, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6203.0}

128 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Consiruction Industry

Women in the building and construction industry

221 Historically, the building and construction industry has been characterised by a predominantly

male labour force. This continues today. ABS figures demonstrate that women make up on ly

I 2 per cent of the construction industry workforce, compared with 44 per cent nati onally

across all industries. The average weekly earnings of women employed within the bu ilding and construction industry is the lowest of all industries as indicated in chart 27.

Chart 27

Average adult total weekly earnings for full time employees, May 2002 ($)

2000

1500

1000

500

0

" (})

1--

(})

co <;:'

OJ c

c

:;e

K" (J)

U') (J)

"-0

';C'

:;;

(J)

<0

N

(J)

<:: 0

n 2 ti <:: 0 (.)

(J)

co

c.o -"" "-

Q)

Q) ro

co

• Fem ales

"-

o"- Nr- co

lO "- (J) ,--

"- N "-

Q)

I? 0

en D c

"' t 8_

"' c=

co (})

lO<;:' N (J)

=:J Males

"- co N .=

f--;=-" co

Q) u

c

l" :::J

-

co (J) "-

U') 0

C') 0

0

co

c Q)

0 u

:..;::::; c

E c

D <1l

"' c Q) E c (;; 6 (')

tD U')

<;:'

(J)

c

0

u

:::J D w

Source: ABS 2002 (Average Weekly Earnings: Australia, May 2002, Cat. no. 6302 .0.)

co N co

;;:; <;:'

2l c

c :::J E E 8 D c "' £ ro Q) I

(})

" (J)

a; (J)

Q)

(;; _c 0

D c

"' ro c Q) [l_

N "- (J)

co co "-

222 A study by McGrath-Champ, Crawford , Tan and Kelleher in I 998, found that of the sma ll

number of women employed in the building and construction industry, the majority were

employed in administrative and accounting functions, rarely in positions of sen ior or middle

management. 192 As outlined in chart 28 , women tend to be employed in clerical positions, with

very few women employed as tradespersons, labourers or professionals.

National Perspective Part 1 I 29

223 This was confirmed by the Australian Industry Group (AI G) in its submission to the Commission,

which stated that relatively few women are employed in the industry, other than in clerical and

administrative roles .193 Information provided by a project director of Baulderstone indicated

that, apart from the nurse, the only other women employed on site were two of the three site

engineers employed in the office. 194

224 There is a clear delineation between gender in particular occupations within the building and

construction industry (c hart 28) . An equitable industry would have shown approximately equal

heights for the female and male bars in this chart.

Chart 28

Percentage distribution of each gender across the industry, August 2002

60

[:::_j Females D Males

50

40

30

20

10

0

"0 if)

c

ro.8

c E

"'u 2

if) Q) if) "0 if) "0 if) Q)"Q if) Q) "0 if) c:-u if) "0 if)

ro rom c c ."ffi@ ."ffi ro c (5 ffi]? c ·u § -"'-"' 0 if) roo as 6 o c if) if) 0 "Uj 0 ·- c 0 Q) Q) 0 if) if) OS !:!s Eros E""s Eros if) if) if) -2'

227 There are a number of factors which cau se there to be extremely low numbers of women

working in the building and construction industry. These factors include marketing, traini ng and

education to women, and disc rim ination and harassment on work sites.

Workers born overseas

228 Often, discussions about the need for specific types of training in th e bu ilding and construction

industry refer to the num ber of buil ding and co nstruction workers from non-English speaking

backgrounds. The ABS published statistics do not provide information for the number of

people whose second language is English; they do provi de information on the number of

people born outside Australia. Th is is illu strated in chart 29.

229 Whi le there were a significant number of workers in the building and construction industry born

outside of Australia, the proportion of 23 per cent was almost the same as the nati onal

average. Based on this data, issues in respect of overse as born workers have the same level of

significance in the bu ilding and construction industry as in many other industries.

Chart 29

Proportion of labour force born outside Australia, August 2002

35

30

25

20

.!!l c Q) !2 &: 15

10

5

0

"" c E

c

0

·n 2

v; c

0

()

Q) D _g

ro Q5 a:

-c ro ro (.) - iil §en uu 0 c E ro E 0 Q)

g'

0

Ui D c

"' t 0 0.

Q) (.)

c

"' 's

30

i£ c

·u; ::> .D u

c

ro

20 20

c Q)

0 (.)

:;::::; c

Q)

'!!u u

E c

u ro

"' c Q) E c Qj € 6 1'5. (') e 0..

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force, Aug 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 6203.0)

2 Q) E E 0 (.) D c "' E ro Q) I

(.)

2

ro c

0

(.)

u

c

"'

.2 ""5 ()

w Q) (.)

2 (]) "' Qj .c. 0

D c

"' ro c 0 t:' Q) 0..

National Perspective Part 1 I 31

Workers' incomes

230 Tab le I 0 sets out the average weekly earnings for workers in the construction industry for adult

managerial, non-managerial and junior wages.

Table 10

Construction Industry wages, May 2000 ($)

Type of wage Average weekly earnings

Adult managerial wages $764.70

Adult non-managerial wages $849.80

Junior wages $441.10

Source: ABS 2001 (Employee earnings and hours, May 2000: Australia, Cat. no. 6306.0)

231 Average adu lt weekly earnings in the bui lding and construction industry were similar to the

national average. However, the building and construction industry was the only industry where

the adult managerial wage ($764 . 70) was lower than the adult non-managerial wage ($849.80).

232 Managerial wages were much lower than the national average , but non-managerial wages

were much higher than the national average. This may arise from the high wage levels of

overtime paid in the industry. 198

233 Th e Queensland Government argued that this result is not surprising given the large number of

working proprietors in the building and construction industry who are likely to be very small

operators. 199

234 Average weekly earnings for wage and salary earners increased steadily in the construction

industry in the period I 993 to 1999, but have fallen in the last two years, in contrast to the

continued growth of average weekly earnings for all industries combined (chart 30). This could

be attributed to compositional changes in the industry's employment patterns and to the

volatility in the industry which coincided with the transition to the new tax system. 200

1 32 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Chart 30

Average adult weekly earnings, May 1993 to May 2001 ($)

1000

-- FT adult construction - - $ All employees construction

$ FT adult all industries All industries

800

600

400

200

0 ______ ____

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Source: ABS 2002 (Australia Now, Construction, Average weekly earnings, Jan 2002)

235 It is often claimed that the income of workers in the bui1ding and construction ind ustry is highly

variable. The ABS provides information on the number of workers in each industry whose

earnings (excluding overtime) vary from one month to the next. This information is presented in

chart 31 to illustrate the proportion of workers in each industry with variable incomes.

236 As would be expected, given that work in the building and construction industry is project

based and affected by a range of factors including the weather, the level of variability in income

was relatively high . At 54 per cent, it was well above the average for all industries (34 per cent).

It was second to agriculture, forestry and fisheries, where 68 per cent of workers had earnings

that vary from month to month.

National Perspective Part 1 I 33

Chart 31

Proportion of employees with variable incomes, August 1998

80

68

70

60

50

49

Q)

"' "' 40 c 40 Q) Q) a. 30 20

10

0

Ol Ol Ol >- <:: Q) Q)

"'

c c c a. .Q D D Q) - Ol Q) u Q) 0 u 0 Q) Q) Q) Q) - c u c u c .>! u u E ·c: "§ 0. "' ro [1l .Y. - c c 0 (.) > ro ro "' "S ·u t 0 .c Q) (') [il Q) u ·.:: 0. a. 1:5 2 Q) 3 <( Q) []._ I "S w (.) Source: ABS 1999 (Forms of Employment, Aug 1998: Australia, Cat. no. 6359.0) 237 Table 11 illustrates that the proportion of the building and construction labour force who recei ve standard benefits in their main job is less than the national average for holi day leave, sick leave and long service leave, and very close to the national average for superannuation. The information in cludes the hou sing sector and covers those who worked for a wage or salary, or in their own incorporated business. Table 11 Proportions of construction workers with benefits (per cent) Type of benefit Employees Average receiving benefit (all industries) Superannuation 89 90 Holiday Leave 67 72 Sick Leave 66 72 Long Service Leave 56 62 Source: ABS 2002 (Employee earnings, benefits and trade union membership, Aug 2001: Australia, Cat. no. 631 0.0) 1 34 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

238 Employed persons in the building and construction industry work slightly more hours than the

national average (chart 32). The proportion of people in the bui lding and construction industry

working more than a 40 hour week was higher than the national average (chart 33) . This is

consistent with .ABS data indicating that 43 per cent of building and construction industry

employees are paid overtime. This is the highest of al l industries and well above the national average of 23 per cent. 201

Ch art 32

Em ployed persons: average hours worked, August 2002

50

40

30

20

10

0

Ol c

£.

44.9

c

0

n 2 t; c 0 (.)

39.9

Q) Ol l"

0

(i) 'D

c

ro t

8.

'i: Q)

c

0

0

·c: :::>

E E 0

0

Q) 0

c

l"

:::> ; 'D

c

ro Q) 0

c

ro c

i.L

i: Q) .0 1:?

c Q)

0 ()

:,:::; c

Q)

E c

'D ro

ro

c Q) E c ro iD £ 6 (9 e Q..

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force, Aug 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 6203.0)

c

0

0

:::> 'D

w

i: 2l c ·c: :::> E E 0 0 'D c ro £ ro Q) I

2 Q)

0

e! 0

e! 'D

c

ro

(li

.2 'S

0

National Perspective Part 1 "135

Chart 33 Employed persons: proportion working more than 40 hours per week, August 2002

60

50

40

Q)

"' "' "E 30 Q) Q) Cl. 20 10

0

55

Ol c

§

R ::0 c "' 2 .c Q_ Q_ ::0

41

c

0

:;::;

" s

40

Q)

g

Q)

1Jl Q)

0

"' s

43

Q) Ol

0

U5

"D c

"' t 0 Q_

$

c

0

u

·c: ::0 E E 8

Q) u

c

::0

c

C1l

Q) u

c

C1l c

u::

ifl u

$

·u; ::0 .0

c Q)

0 u

:;:; c

E c

"D C1l

C1l

c Q) -o E c c 1l. (.')

e Cl.

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force , Aug 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 6203.0)

Workers' literacy and numeracy

c

0

u

::0

$

c ·c: ::0 E E 0 u "D c "' £ ro Q) I

Q)

(ij

c

0

t" u

t" "D c

C1l

2

:; ()

Q)

til

"' 15 "D §

(ij

Q) Q_

239 CFMEU, in its submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Amendment

(Genuine Bargaining) Bill 2002, provided information from a 1996 ABS Survey into Aspects of

Literacy, in support of submissions that poor literacy and numeracy were impediments to

enterprise based negotiations by workers in the building and construction industry. CFMEU

stated that the 1996 study had found that the literacy skills of the construction workforce were considerably poorer than those of the Australian workforce in general. Fifty-five per cent of

construction workers had poor literacy skills compared to 39 per cent for all industrie s. Over 43

per cent of construction workers had poor numeracy skills compared to just over 36 per cent for all industries. The numeracy skill s of younger workers aged 15 to 34 years were poorer than

the numeracy skills of older workers (46 per cent as compared to 42 per cent) 202

1 36 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Mobility of workers

240 While the level of mobility in the building and construction industry was high, particularly for

people moving between jobs within the industry, there were several other industries with similar

levels of mobility. For those people employed in the building and construction industry in

February 2002 13 per cent had moved jobs within the last year (chart 34). Th is compared with

a national average of 14 per cent, 22 per cent in mining, 21 per cent in accommodation, cafes

and restaurants, 19 per cent in financ e and insurance, 17 per cent in retail trade and property

and business services and 16 per cent for transport and storage and wholesale trade. Out of

17 industries, building and construction workers were the tenth most mobile.

Ch art 34

Mobility of labour force, February 2002

• Percentage moved jobs w1thin industry • Percentage moved jobs between industries

25

20

" 15

"' "' c; " !::' " a. 10

5

0

Source:

Note:

D Percentage moved jobs

-- r---- -

- c-- r---- f--- - r---- r---- r-- -- r----

r- r- I

IIJ II

I

i

0> Ol 0) >. c Q) Q)

c c c a. 0 u TI Q)- Ol Q) 0 Q) 0 0 0 Q) Q) Q) Q)

£ ·c: .§ 0. :;::;

- c 0 c 0 "" c

0 0 0

"' .2' 2' 2' 2' 2' ""' (.) 0 :::> 0 0 0 "" Q) - Q) Q) Q) Q) TI "" (jj co

(ij

:::>

t) 1D TI .£ TI c :::>

"'

c

"'

c Q) a: !!! c Q 0 0 2 (.) .c 0 c t "' "' Ui u s E "' 0 0 Q) ·u; E D I!! c 0. c :::> c E !!! "' E 0 D Q) c .2 c 0 0 "' . c c 0 (.) > t1l t1l

finance and insurance, and property and business services. They ranked equally with retail

trade, health and community services, and personal and other services. The national average was eight pe r cent.

242 The period of time workers had been employed in their current job in the building and

construction industry was slightly higher than the national average (chart 35) . In February 2002

30 per cen t of construction workers had spent over ten years with their current employer. Th is

compared with 24 per cent of workers nationa ll y. Consequently, without portable long service

leave arrangements, construction workers would be just as likely as the average worker to be

eligible for long service leave.

243 As noted in the following section , there is a higher level of involuntary redundancy in the

building and construction industry than in most other industries. Hence, the proportion of people choosing to leave their employer is less.

Chart 35

Duration of current job, February 2002

60

50

40

Q) tJ)

"' c 30 Q) Q) o._

20

10

0

f.-- f- 1--- f--

f-.- e.- 1---

f---- f-

>-a. 0. :0 (/) ill D c "' (/) ro tJ)

• under 1 year

e.-

c: 0

n 2 1i) c: 0 ()

ro (/)

1---

1---

e.-

f-

g 1-10years D over 1 0 years

1--

f-

2 (/) D c

ro t

g_ (/)

c

1-- 1-- 1-- I-

f--f--1---1---l---1--1--1--1-

1-- 1-- 1--

()

'2' 3l c

0

()

c :0 E E 0 ()

:0

(/)

.S D c

ro

ffi c

LI:

1--

()

2' QJ (/)

(/)

rn

'iii

:0

.0

c Q)

0 ()

:,:::;C - Q)

E c

D ro

ro

c QJ D E c c ;_ t 0 (') e (l_

e.-

I--

e.- 1--- 1--- 1--

(/)

QJ ()

2 QJ (/) c ·c :0 E E 0 () D c ro £ ro

I--

(/)

QJ ()

2' QJ (/)

ro c

0

(ll ()

(ll D c

ro

2

3

u

(/)

2l 2' QJ (/)

1' 0

D c

ro ro c

0

['?

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Mobility Australia, Feb 2002, Cat. no. 6209.0)

1 38 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Retrenchment

244 Tab le 12 presents information for people retrenched in the three years to 30 June 1997. It

includes people who were both retrenched and made redundant.

245 While retrenchments, as a proportion of employment, were higher in the building and

construction industry than the national average, there were still several other industries where

the results were as high or higher.

Table 12

Retrenched workers and total employees between the ages of 18-64, 1997

Industry Retrenched Proportion of Total

workers workers employees

('000) retrenched between 18-64

(per cent) ('000)

Agricu ltu re, forest ry and fishing 18.0 13 138.3

Mining 10.9 15 72.6

Manufacturing 166.9 19 899.6

Electricity gas and water supply 19.3 30 64.4

Construction 59.1 18 322.0

Who lesale trade 46.4 12 384.8

Retail trade 82 .0 12 693.3

Accommodation, cafes and restaurants 37.0 13 275.4

Transport and storage 30.6 10 291.7

Communication services 17.5 14 129.1

Finance and insurance 23.1 9 258.9

Property and business services 47.6 8 584.5

Government administration and defence 39.5 12 322.5

Education 21.5 4 518.5

Health and community services 33.9 5 644.3

Cultural and rec reational services 14.6 11 131 .7

Personal and other services 17.6 8 22 1.7

All industries 685.4 12 5953.5

Source : ABS 2001 (Labou r Force, Nov 2001: Australia, Cat. no . 6203.0)

Note: This was the most recent data on retrenched workers published in 6203.0.

National Perspective Part 1 1 39

246 In the three years before 1997 there was a short term fa ll in the level of building and

construction activity, fol lowed by a rise . This is likely to be reflected in a higher level of

retrenchments th an would occur in periods when activity in the industry is constant or growing

and a high number of people subsequently are re -employed in the industry. However, this

cyc lical pattern of fal ls and growth in building and construction activity is typical for this industry.

Consequently, the conclusions drawn from the data are likely to hold for the industry over time.

247 The building and construction in dustry had a high proportion of unemployed people who lost

their job involuntarily. Table 13 looks at people who have worked for two weeks or more in the

past two years and the reasons why they left their employment. It in cludes people who lost

their job involuntarily -for example they where laid off or retrenched from that job, left that job

because of their own ill -health or injury, or the job was seasonal or temporary - or they were

running their own busi ness and the business closed down, for example because of financial

difficulties. It also includes people v1ho left their job voluntaril y. Th is includes those whose last

job was running their own business where the business closed down or was sold voluntarily.

248 The only industry where the percentage of people who lost their job involuntarily was higher

was agriculture, forestry and fishing . These data provide support for the claim that the level of

in voluntary retren chment among unemployed building and construction workers is relative ly

high.

249 ABS provides information on whether retrenched workers found alternative employment. That

information indicates that there were only three industries - mining , finance and insurance, and

property and business services - where the proportion of retrenched workers who found new

employment was higher. 203

250 The number of retrenched workers remaining in th e same industry and occupation provides

some support for th e claim that it is typical for bu il ding and construction workers to be

retrenched at the end of one job and then re-employed in th e industry. The data indicate that

this was relatively more common in building and construction than in most other industries. On

average , across all industries, 37 per cent of retrenched workers were re-employed in the same

industry and occupation. In the bu il ding and construction industry, this rate was 52 per cent.

The only industry where th is rate was higher was agriculture, forestry and fishing (64 per cent).

25 1 This conclusion is further supported by a survey undertaken by the ABS that asked how

residential construction and construction trade businesses dealt with downturns in the industry.

That survey indicated that 2.5 per cen t of businesses looked to reducing their expenditure on

staff, 9.8 per cent reduced expenditure on employed trades staff and 13.9 per cent reduced

th e number of subcontractors they engaged.204

1 40 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Ta ble 13

Unemployed persons: reasons for ceasing last job, August 2002

Ind ustry Lost job involuntarily Left job voluntarily Total

'000 per cent '000 per cent '000

Agricultu re, forestry and fish ing 17 .0 84 3.3 16 20 .3

Manufacturi ng 35.7 74 12.7 26 48.4

Construction 21.1 82 4.5 18 25.6

Wholesale trade 6.6 61 4.2 39 10.8

Retai l trade 31 .5 45 38.9 55 70.4

Accommodation, cafes and 14 .1 44 17.6 56 31.7

restaurants

Transport and storage 11.0 66 5.6 34 16.6

Government administration 8.5 75 2.8 25 11. 3

and defence

Education 6.4 69 2.9 31 9.3

Health and community services 5.5 43 7.2 57 12.7

Cultural and recreational services 6.9 68 3.3 32 10.2

Personal and other services 8.3 67 4.0 33 12.3

Other industries 42 .2 62 25 .4 38 67 .6

All Industries 214.8 62 132.4 38 347.2

Source: ABS 2002 (Labour Force, Aug 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 6203.0)

National Perspective Part 1 I 4 I

Notes to Profile of Participants

6

9

Australian Industry Group (AIG) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 28 March, exhibit 441, document 016.0672.0673.0001_001 at 0009-{)01 0.

Overview of Private Meetings held between the Honourable TRH Cole RFD QC and participants in the bui lding and construction industry, exhibit 442, paragraphs 39-40, document 088.0525.0010.0001.

Commission estimates based on ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8752.0); ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8762.0).

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in reference to discussion paper 3, 3 July, exhibit 825, document 001. 1819.1805.0003 at 0003.

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in reference to discussion paper 3, 3 July, exhibit 825, document 001. 1819.1805.0003 at 0003.

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) (online), Superannuation Institutions Statistics, Superannuation Market Statistics [accessed October 2002]. www.aora.qov.au/Statistics/Superannuation­ Market -Statistics. cfm

Australian Industry Group 2001, Statement by the Australian Industry Group, exhibit 17, document 100.0964 0072.0001 at 0020.

Overview of Private Meetings held between the Honourable TRH Cole RFD QC and participants in the building and construction industry, exhibit 442, paragraphs 37- 38, document 088.0525.0010.0001.

Overview of Private Meetings held between the Honourable TRH Cole RFD QC and participants in the building and construction indust ry, exhibit 442, paragraphs 37, document 088.0525.0010.0001. 10 Overview of Private Meetings held between the Honourable TRH Cole RFD QC and participants in the

building and constru ction industry, exhibit 442, paragraphs 38, document 088.0525.0010.0001. 11 Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (online), Superannuation Market Statistics June 2002 [accessed 14 January 2003]. http://www.apra.qov.au/Statistics/Superannuation-M arket-Statistics.cfm 12

Moneymanager (online), Superannuation [accessed 8 November 2002], http://www.moneymanager.com.au/tools/factsheets/super funds.html 13 Moneymanager (online), Superannuation [accessed 8 November 2002],

http://www.moneymanager.com.au/tools/factsheets/super funds.html 14 Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry: Phase One, 15 May, exhibit 494, parag raph 203, _ document 005.0151.0052.0002. 15

Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry: Phase One, 15 May, exhibit 494, paragraph 218, document 005.0151.0052.0002. 16 CBUS 2000 (online), Members, Australia [accessed October 2002].

http://www. cbussuper. com .au/members 17 CBUS 2000 (on line), Members, Australia [accessed October 2002]. http :1 !www. cbussuper. com. au/members 18

Commission estimates based on ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8752.0); ABS 2002 (Engineering Construction Activity, June Quarter 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 8762.0). 19 Parliament of Australia, Joint Standing Committee on Public Works,

www.aph.qov.au/house/committee/pwc/reports.htm . 20 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 2002, Client Skills: Skills required by Government as the Construction Industry Client, p. 2, [accessed 7 January 2003].

http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/CiientSkills-v2.pdf 21 New South Wales Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 19 April, exh ibit 558, document 023.0638.0572.0001 at 0003.

1 4 2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

22 Western Australian Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 6 March, exhibit 250, paragraph 65, document 030.0157.0729.0006.

23 Tasmanian Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 21 February, exhibit 179, document 016.0409.0260.0002 at 0002. 24 Northern Territory Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry, 22 March, exhibit 822, document 040.0429.0811.0002 at 0003.

25

Department of Infrastructure (Victoria) (online), Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (March 1999), cl. 1.3.3 [accessed 6 January 2003],

http://www.buildinqcommission.com.au/ CVICWeb/knowledge/Code%20of%20Practice%20Buildinq.pdf 26 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 2 [accessed 6 January 2003],

http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of practice.pdf 27 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 2 [accessed 6 January 2003],

http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of oractice.pdf 28 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the

Construction Industry, p. 3 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of practice.pdf 29 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the

Construction Industry, p. 3 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of oractice.pdf

30 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 3 [accessed 6 January 2003], http :1 /www.apcc. qov.au/apcc/docs/ code of practice. pdf 31

Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 3 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of practice.pdf 32

Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 5 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of practice.pdf 33

Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (onl ine), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 6 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of practice.pdf. 34

Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, p. 6 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of oractice.pdf 35 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997 (online), National Code of Practice for the

Construction Industry, p. 8 [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.apcc.qov.au/apcc/docs/code of practice.pdf 36 Victoria- Overview Bundle Vol 1, exhibit 2(A), document 007.0137.0535.0084 at 0094. 37

Queensland Department of Industrial Relations 2000, Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry, cl. 1.1 [accessed 8 January 2003], http://www.ir.qld.qov.au/publications/b&ccodeofpractice.pdf

38 Kobelke, J. (Hon) 2002 (online), New Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, Media Statement, 28 January 2002, paragraph 1 [accessed 10 January 2002], http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/medialmedia.nsf!HTMUMinisters+Menu?openDocument

39 Western Australian Government 2002 (online), Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry in Western Australia, p. 5 [accessed 20 January 2003], http://www.docep.wa.gov.au/ lr/publications/pdfs/ConductCode.pdf

National Perspective Part 1 143

40 Tasmanian Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 21 February, exhibit 179, document 016.0409.0260.0002 at 0004.

4 1

Tasmanian Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 21 February, exhibit 179, document 016.0409.0260.0002 at 0004.

42 Territory Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 22 March, exhibit 822, document 040. 0429.081 1.0002 at 0005.

43

Northern Territory Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 22 March, exhibit 179, document 016.0409.0260.0002 at 0005.

44 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 2002, Client Skills: Skills required by Government as the Construction Industry Client, p. 10 [accessed 7 January 2003], http://www.apcc.gov.au/apcc/docs/CiientSkills-v2 .pdf

45

Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry: Phase One, 15 May, exhibit 494, document 005.0151.0052.0002 at 0006. 46 Commonwealth Government, Department of In dustry, Tourism and Resources 1999 (online), Building for

Growth: Key Initiatives ofthe Building and Construction Industries Action Agenda, 6 May [accessed 9 January 2003], http://www.i ndustrv.gov.au/ librarv/content librarv/ BC brochure.pdf 47 Commonwealth Government, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources 1999 (online) , Bwlding for

Growth: Building and Construction Industries Action Agenda, 6 May [accessed 9 January 2003], http://www. industrv. gov.au/ librarv/content librarv/BC-response. pdf 48 Commonwealth Government, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources 1999 (online), Building for

Growth: Key Initiatives of the Building and Construction Industries Action Agenda, 6 May [accessed 9 January 2003], http://www.industrv.gov.au/librarv/content librarv/BC brochure. pdf 49 Thompson, M. 1995, 'Current Trends in the Construction Industry - What will happen to Government

Reforms and Best Practice', paper presented at Synergy Conventions - International Best Practice in Construction , Sydney, Australia. 50 New South Wales Government, Premier's Department 1992 (online), Memorandum No. 92-33: Implementation of Recommendation from the Royal Commission into Productivity in the Building Industry

[accessed 1 July 2002], http://www.prerniers.nsw.gov.au/pubs dload part4/orem circs rnemos/prern memos/1992/m92-33.htm 51 New South Wales Government, Premier's Department 1992 (online), Memorandum No. 92-33:

Implementation of Recommendation from the Royal Commission into Productivity in the Building Industry

[accessed 1 July 2002], http://www.prerniers.nsw.gov.au/pubs dload part4/prem circs rnemos/prern memos/ 1992/m92-33.htm

52 New South Wales Government, Premier's Department 1992 (online) , Memorandum 92-37: Code of Practice for the Construction Industry [accessed 1 July 2002], http://www.premiers.nsw.gov.au/pubs dload part4/prem circs memos/ prern rnemos/1992/rn92-37.html 53 Local Government Act 7993 (NT), ss182(1) (by-law power), 121, 131 (control of roads), Sch. 2 (control of

public places); Peaceful Assembly Act 1992 (Old), s5(4) (the power of local authorities to regulate pedestrian ma ll s is subject to the right of a person 'to assemble peacefully with others in a public place'); Local Government Act 1993 (Tas), ss20 (powers), 145 (by-laws); Local Government Act 1989 (Vic), ss205, 207, Sch. 11 ell. 1 0(1 )(a) , 11. 54

Australian Constructors Association (ACA) (online) About ACA [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.constructors.eom.au/pages/about/whoarewe.htm 55 Austral ian Constructors Association (ACA) (online) About ACA [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www. constructors. corn .au/pages/about/whoarewe. htm 56 Dempsey Statement, exhibit 905, attachment 1, paragraph 9, document 080.0566.0560.0015. 57

Australian Constructors Association (ACA) (online) About ACA [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.constructors.eom.au/pages/about/whoarewe.htrn

1 44 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

58 Australian Constructors Association (ACA) (online) About ACA [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.constructors.com.au/pages/about/whoarewe.htm

59 Australian Constructors Assoc1ation (ACA) (online) Code of Ethics [accessed 6 January 2003], http://www.constructors.com.au/ pages/code/ policies.htm 60 Australian Industry Group (AIG) (online), Member services brochure [accessed 6 January 2003],

http://www.aigroup.asn.au/PDFs/member services 1208.pdf 61 Australian Industry Group (AI G) 2001 , Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 12 November, exhibit 17, document 100.0964.0072.0001 at 0048.

62 Australian Industry Group (AI G) 2001 , Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 12 November, exhibit 17, document 100.0964.0072.0001 at 0004. 63 Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) 2001, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, document 064.0681.0226.0003 at 0005. 64 Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) 2001, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, document 064.0681.0226.0003 at 0005. 65

Master Builders Australia Inc (M BA Inc) 2001, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, document 064.0681.0226.0003 at 0007-0010. 66 Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) 2001, Submission to the Royal Comm1ssion into the Building and

Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, document 064.0681 .0226.0003 at 0005. 67 Master Builders Australia Inc (MBA Inc) 2001 , Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, document 064.0681 .0226.0003 at 0006. 68 Housing Industry Association Ltd (HIA) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry, 25 March, exhibit 521, document 007.0670.0881.0001 at 0008. 69 Housing Industry Association Ltd (HIA) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 25 March, exhibit 521, document 007.0670.0881.0001 at 0010.

70

Housing Industry Association Ltd (HIA) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission 1nto the Building and Construction Industry, 25 March, exhibit 521 , document 007.0670.0881.0001 at 0010- 0011. 71 Civil Contractors Federation (CCF) 2000, Submission to the Senate Committee in reference to Workplace

Relations Amendment Bill 2000, 25 May, exhibit 168, document 017.0705.0540.0208. 72 Civil Contractors Federation (CCF) 2000, Submission to the Senate Committee in reference to Workplace Relations Amendment Bill 2000, 25 May, exhibit 168, document 017.0705.0540.0208. 73

Civil Contractors Federation (CCF) (online), About the Civil Contractors Federation [accessed

21 December 2002], http://content.e-mach.com/ccfnat!Your Website Page 2

74

Civil Contractors Federation (CCF) 2001 , Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 1 November, exhibit 168, document 017.0705.0540.0198 at 0199. 75 Civil Contractors Federation (CCF) (online), CCF Code of Ethics [accessed 21 December 2002],

http:/ / content .e-mach .com/backdoor /ccfnat/code ethics/

76

National Electrical and Communications Association (NECA) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 21 May, exhibit 528, document 097.0993.0724.0002 at 0004. 77 Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) (online), National Electrical and Communications

Association Constitution and Rules [accessed 4 January 2003], http://www.airc.gov.au/ organisations/ rules/ 233vfed/233vfed.pdf 78 Air Conditioning and Mechanical Contractors' Association of Victoria Ltd (AMCA) 2002, Submission to the

Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 19 July, exhibit 857, document 031 .0615.0400.0001 at 0002.

79

Air Conditioning and Mechanical Contractors' Association of Victoria Ltd (AMCA) (on line), Code of Ethics [accessed 21 December 2002], http://www.amca.com.au/Code of Ethics/code of ethics.html

National Perspective Part 1 l 45

80 Australian Industry Group (AIG) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 12 November, exhibit 17, document 100.0964.0072.0001 at 0023.

8 1

Victorian Auditor-General 1999, Road Construction in Victoria: Major projects managed by VicRoads: Performance Audit Report 61, Melbourne, parag raph 8.48.

82

Master Bui lders Australia Inc (MBA In c) 2001 , Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 11 December, exhibit 6, paragraph 74, document 064.0681.0226.0003.

83 Mayhew, C., Young, C., Ferris, R. & Hartnett, C., 1997, An Evaluation ofthe Impact of Targeted Interventions on the OHS Behaviours of Small Business Building Industry Owners/Managers/Contractors,

NOHSC, Sydney, cited in Bui lding and Construction Industry (Workplace Health and Safety) Taskforce 2000, Health and Safety in the Building and Construction Industry- Final Report, Queensland, p. 18.

84 As quoted by the CFMEU, Sutton Statement, exhibit 701, Appendix C, paragraph 3.1, document 098.0019.0116.0039 at 0043--D044 .

85 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects, Labour Market Research Report, Au slnfo, Canberra, p. 12.

86 Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry: Phase One, 15 May, exhibit 494, paragraph 25, document 005.0151.0052.0002.

87

ASS 2001 (Business Operations and Industry Performance, 1999-2000, Cat. no. 8140.0). Note: The 2000-01 data for this report exc ludes the Agriculture, forestry and fishing industry statistics. 88 ASS 2001 (Business Operations and Industry Performance, 1999-2000, Cat. no. 8140.0) . Note: The 2000-01 data for this report excludes the Agriculture, forestry and fishing industry statistics. 89 ASS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry Australia, 1996-97, Cat. No. 8772. 0) . 90 ASS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, Australia, 1996-97, Cat. no. 8772.0). Note: The

2000-01 data for this report excludes the Agriculture, forestry and fishing industry statistics. 9 1 Overview of Private Meetings held between the Honourable TRH Cole RFD QC and participants in the building and construction industry, exhibit 442, paragraph 13, document 088.0525.0010.0001. 92 ASS 2002 (Forms of Em ployment: Australia, Sept 2002, Cat. no. 6359.0). 93 ASS 2002 (Glossary, Labour Force, Austral ia, Oct 2002, Cat. No. 6203.0). 94

ASS 2002 (Labour Force: Australia, Aug 2002 , Cat. no. 6203.0). 95 ASS 2002 (6291.0.40.001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed- Australia- Quarterly- Labour Force- Own Account Workers - Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6291.0) and ASS 2002 (6291.0.40.001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed- Australia- Quarterly - Labour Force- Employed Persons Table 91 - Australia, Aug 2002,

Cat. no. 6291 .0). 96 ASS 2002 (6291.0.40.001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed- Au stralia- Quarterly- Labour Force- Own Account Workers- Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no . 6291.0) and ASS 2002 (629 1.0.40.001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed- Australia - Quarterly- Labour Force- Employed Persons Table 91- Australia , Aug 2002,

Cat. no. 6291 .0). 97 Underhill, E. 1999 (on line), 'Collective Action and Labour Hire Workers : A Preli minary Analysis of the 1997 Victorian Labour Hire Dispute', a paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Association of

Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand, 'Current Research in Labour Relations' ,

Adelaide, vol. 2, p. 278 [accessed 7 January 2003]. http://www. mnqt. waikato. ac.nz/depts/ SMU Airaanz/old/conferce/adelaide 1999/pdf/pdf/ Underhilln .pdf 98 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union 2002, Response by the CFMEU Construction & General Division to Discussion Paper 16- Demarcation Disputes in the Building and Construction Industry,

6 December, exhibit 1913, document 050.0510.0860.002 at 0004-0005. 99 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Build1ng Projects. Labour Market Research Report, Ausl nfo, Canberra, p. 25.

100 Ferguson, T7601 .

146 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

101

Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects. Labour Market Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, p. xxi.

102 Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [5 .52]. 102 ABS 2002 (Australia Now, Construction, Union Membership, Jan 2002). Note: These numbers represent a

proportion of union members surveyed at an appointed tim e during August of each year. 104 Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [12 .34] .

105 Shorten, B. (online), Changing tactics for changing times [accessed 3 January 2003]. http://www.awu .net.au/media/media releases/ news93.html 106

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (online), CFMEU Amalgamation, [accessed 29 May 2002]. http://www.cfmeu.asn.au/construction/historvjamalg.html, exhibit 701 , Appendix A, document 098.0019 0116 0024 107

Constru ction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (online), Solidarity and Political Action - Fi ghting for a better world [accessed 29 May 2002], http://www.cfmeu.asn.au/construction/ history/ solid.html, exhibit 701 , Appendix A, document 098 001 9. 0116.0032. 108

CFM EU Rules (1 05N -FED: incorporates alterations of 19 July 2002), Rule 4, exhibit 1342, document 033.0621.0146 .0066 at 0084-Q085. 109 CFMEU Rules (1 05N -FED: incorporates alterati ons of 19 July 2002), Ru le 42D, Divisional Restructuri ng

(FFTS) , exhibit 1342, document 033.0621 .0 146.0066 at 0123. 110 CFMEU Construction and General Division Rules (1 05N:BWIU: incorporates alterations of 13 December 2002), Rule 18, 28, exhibit 2076, document 098 0857 0170.0001 at 0022-0025, 0030. 111

CFMEU Construction and General Division Rul es (1 05N: BWIU: incorporates alterations of 13 December 2002). Rule 28, exhibit 2076, document 098.0857.0170.0001 at 0030. 112 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union , Construction an.d General Division, National Office (200 1),

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Labourers Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statemen ts for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union , Constructi on and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 14 March; Construction, Forestry, Mi ning and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, South Australian Branch (2001 ), Fi nancial Statements for year ended 31 Decem ber 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union , Construction and General Division, Western Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000,

19 March; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Australian Capital Territory Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 28 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Tasmanian Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 18 May; Construction , Forestry,

Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch (2001 ),

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 16 May; Constru ction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Vi ctorian Building Uni ons Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 15 August; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Clay and Ceramics Industry Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 23 January.

i

13

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union , Construction and General Division, National Office (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Labourers Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statements fo r year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction , Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 14 March; Constructio n, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financial Statements for

National Perspective Part 1 I 4 7

year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Western Australian Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December

2000, 19 March; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division,

Australian Capital Territory Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 28 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Tasmanian Divisional

Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 18 May; Construction, Forestry,

Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 16 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Union, Construction and General Division , Victorian Building Unions Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial

Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 15 August; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Clay and Ceramics Industry Divisional Branch (2001), Financial

Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 23 January.

114 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, National Office (2001 ).

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Union, Construction and General Division , Queensland Construction Labourers Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Union, Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch (2001),

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 14 March; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, South Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for

year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Western Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December

2000, 19 March; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Australian Capital Territory Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 3 1 December 2000, 28 May;

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Tasmanian Divisional

Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 18 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union , Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch (2001),

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 16 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division , Victorian Building Unions Divisional Branch (2001), Financial

Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 15 August; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Clay and Ceramics Industry Divisional Branch (2001), Financial

Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 23 January. 115 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, National Office (2001 ),

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Labourers Divisional Branch (2001 ),

Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Union, Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 14 March; Construction, Forestry, Mining and

Energy Union, Construction and General Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financial Statements for

year ended 31 December 2000, 22 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction

and General Division, Western Australian Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December

2000, 1 g March; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division,

Australian Capital Territory Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 28 May;

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Tasmanian Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 18 May; Construction, Forestry,

Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 16 May; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Union, Construction and General Division, Victorian Building Unions Divisional Branch (2001), Financial Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 15 August; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Union, Construction and General Division, Clay and Ceramics Industry Divisional Branch (2001 ), Financial

Statements for year ended 31 December 2000, 23 January. 116 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (online) , What is the CFMEU? [accessed 17 December 2002], http://www.cfmeu.asn.au

148 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

11 7 Sutton Statement, exhibit 701, paragraph 6, document 098.0019.0116.0001.

118 Maitland AIRC Statutory Declaration, CFMEU National Secretary, 3 April 2002, exhibit 2006, document 085.0391 0438.0001 at 0003.

119 Sutton Statement, exhibit 701, paragraph 6, document 098 .0019.0116.0001. 12 ° Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (online), Welcome to CFMEU Construction Online

[accessed 17 December 2002], http://www.cfmeu.asn.au/construction 121 CFMEU Construction and General Division Rul es (1 05N:BWIU: incorporates alterations of 13 December 2002), Rule 29, exh1b1t 2076, document 098.0857 0170.0001 at 0030-0031; CFM EU Rules (1 05N-FED:

incorporates alterations of 19 July 2002), Ru le 2-3, exhibit 1342, document 033.0621.0146.0066 at 0068-0084.

122 CFMEU Rules (1 05N-FED: incorporates alterations of 19 July 2002), Rule 7(iv), exhibit 1342, document 033.0621 .0146.0066 at 0087.

123 CFMEU Rules (105N -FED: incorporates alterations of 19 July 2002), Rule 8(iv)(a), exhibit 1342, document 033.0621.0146.0066 at 0089. 124

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services Union (CEPU) (online), CEPU General Information - CEPU Structure, [accessed 19 November 2002], http://apro.techno.net.au/ceou/tob201.htm; CEPU CD General Information - CEPU CD History, [accessed 19 November 2002], http://www.apro.tech.net.au/cepu/tob205.htm 125

Rules of the Communications, Electrical , Electronic , Energy, Information , Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia (128V Incorporates alterations of 17 April 2002), Rule 3, exhibit 1995, document 091 .0549 0085 0002 at 0019- 0021 .

126 CEPU Rules, Section "B" , Rules of the Electrical Division of the CEPU (128V-ELE: incorporates alterations of 17 April 2002), Ru le 1.1, exhibit 1996, document 085.0222.0445.0083 at 0084. 127

CEPU Rules, Section "C", Rules of the Plumbing Division of the CEPU (128V-P LU: incorporates alterations of 31 October 2000), Rule 1, exhibit 1994, document 085 0222 0445.0002 at 0004. 128 CEPU Rules, Section "B", Rules of the Electrical Division of the CEPU (128V-ELE: incorporates alterations of

17 April 2002), Rule 11.1, exhibit 1996, document 085.0222 .0445.0083 at 0103. 129 CEPU Rules, Section "C", Rules of the Plumbing Divis1 on of the CEPU (128V-PLU: incorporates alterations of 31 October 2000), Rule 48.1.1 exhibit 1994, document 085 0222.0445.0002 at 0029. 130

CEPU Rules, Section "B", Rules of the Electrical Division of the CEPU (1 28V-ELE: incorporates alterations of 17 April 2002), Rule 11.12.1, exhibit 1996, document 085.0222.0445 0083 at 0109. 131 Rules of the Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia (128V: incorporates alterations of 17 April 2002), Rule 4, 6, exhibit 1995, document 091.0549.0085.0002 at 0021 - 0023, 0024-0025; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union (C EPU) (on line), CEPU CD General Information­ CEPU CD History, [accessed 19 November 2002], http://apro.techno.net.au/cepu/tob205.htm; CEPU General Information- CEPU Structure, [accessed 19 November 2002],

http://apro.techno.net.au/cepu/tob201 .htm 132 Rules of the NSW Divisional Branch of the Electrical Division of the Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (1 28V-NSW: incorporates

alterations of 3 March 2000), Rule 1A, exhibit 1997, document 085.0222.0445.0044 at 0045.

133 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division , National Office (2001), Annual Report 31 December 2000, 4 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, New South Wales Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements 31 December 2000, 9 August; Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services

Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Victorian Branch (2001), Financial Report 31 December 2000, 30 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services

National Perspective Part 1 I 49

Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Queensland Branch (2001), Annual Report 31 December 2000,

9 April; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services

Union of Australia, Electrical Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Balance Sheets and Revenue Statements 31 December 2000, 4 April; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Western Australian Branch (2001 ),

Financial Accounts 31 December 2000, 31 May; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Tasmanian Branch

(2001), Financial Accounts 31 December 2000, 22 January. 134 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Un1on of

Australia, Plumbing Division, National Office (2001), Financial Report, 6 December; Communications,

Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Al lied Services Union of Australia , Plumbing Division, Canberra Branch (2001), Financial Accounts, 5 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic,

Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Tasmanian

Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 16 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Queensland Branch (2001 ),

Financial Report, 14 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing

and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financial

Statements, 26 September; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing

and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Victorian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 25 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Plumbing Division, New South Wales Branch (2001), Financial Report 31 March 2001,

23 October; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Western Australian Branch (2001), Financial Report, 30 August. 135

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, National Office (2001 ), Annual Report 31 December 2000, 4 June;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Electrical Division, New South Wales Branch (2001), Financial Statements 31 December 2000, 9 August; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services

Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Victorian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report 31 December 2000,

30 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Al lied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Queensland Branch (2001), Annual Report 31 December 2000,

9 April; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia , Electrical Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Balance Sheets and Revenue

Statements 31 December 2000, 4 April; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Western Australian Branch (2001),

Financial Accounts 31 December 2000, 31 May; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Tasmanian Branch

(2001), Financial Accounts 31 December 2000, 22 January. 136 Communications, Electrical, Electron ic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Plumbing Division, National Office (2001 ), Financial Report, 6 December; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing

Division, Canberra Branch (2001 ), Financial Accounts, 5 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic,

Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Tasmanian

Branch (2001), Financial Report, 16 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia , Plumbing Division, Queensland Branch (2001 ),

Financial Report, 14 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing

and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financ1al

Statements, 26 September; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Victorian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 25 July;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, New South Wales Branch (2001 ), Financial Report 31 March 2001,

I 50 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

23 October; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Western Australian Branch (2001), Financial Report, 30 August.

137 Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Electrical Division, National Office (2001 ), Annual Report 31 December 2000, 4 June;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Electrical Division, New South Wales Branch (2001), Financial Statements 31 December 2000,

9 August; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services

Union of Australia, Electrical Division , Victorian Branch (2001), Fi nancial Report 31 December 2000,

30 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division , Queensland Branch (2001 ), Annual Report 31 December 2000,

9 April; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Balance Sheets and Revenue

Statements 31 December 2000, 4 April; Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal ,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Western Australian Branch (2001 ),

Financial Accounts 31 December 2000, 31 May; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Tasmanian Branch

(2001), Financial Accounts 31 December 2000, 22 January.

138 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Plumbing Division , National Office (2001), Financial Report, 6 December; Communications,

Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Canberra Branch (2001 ), Financial Accounts, 5 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic,

Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Tasmanian

Branch (2001), Financial Report, 16 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information,

Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Queensland Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 14 June; Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing

and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financial

Statements, 26 September; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing

and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Victorian Branch (2001), Financial Report, 25 July;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Plumbing Division, New South Wales Branch (2001 ), Financial Report 31 March 2001, 23 October; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Western Australian Branch (2001), Financial Report,

30 August.

139 The income of $11.9 million excludes the $1.4 million received in sustentation fees by the National Office of the Electrical Division. Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, National Office (2001 ), Annual Report 31 December 2000, 4 June;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Electrical Division, New South Wales Branch (2001) , Financial Statements 31 December 2000, 9 August; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services

Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Victorian Branch (2001), Financial Report 31 December 2000, 30 June;

Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Electrical Division, Queensland Branch (2001), Annual Report 31 December 2000, 9 April;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Electrical Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Balance Sheets and Revenue Statements 31 December 2000, 4 April; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and

Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Western Australian Branch (2001), Financial Accounts

31 December 2000, 31 May; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing

and Allied Services Union of Australia, Electrical Division, Tasmanian Branch (2001), Financial Accounts

31 December 2000, 22 January.

National Perspective Part 1 i 51

14 ° Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Canberra Branch (2001 ), Financial Accounts, 5 June; Communications,

Electrical, ElectroniC, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing

Division, Tasmanian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 16 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Queensland

Branch (2001), Financial Report, 14 June; Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information,

Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financial Statements, 26 September; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Victorian Branch (2001), Financial

Report, 25 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, New South Wales Branch (2001), Financial Report 31 March

2001, 23 October; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Western Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 30 August. 141 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Plumbing Division, National Office (2001), Financial Report, 6 December. 14 2 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information , Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of

Australia, Plumbing Division, National Office (2001), Financial Report, 6 December; Communications,

Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Pl umbing and Al lied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing

Division, Canberra Branch (2001), Financial Accounts, 5 June; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Tasmanian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report, 16 July; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information,

Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division , Queensland Branch (2001),

Financial Report , 14 June; Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal , Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, South Australian Branch (2001), Financial

Statements, 26 September; Communications, Electrical , Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, Victorian Branch (2001), Financial Report, 25 July;

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumbing Division, New South Wales Branch (2001), Financial Report 31 March 2001,

23 October; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, Plumb1ng Division, Western Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Report,

30 August. 143 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union

(CEPU) (online), CEPU Communications Division, Origins of the CEPU [accessed 7 January 2003],

http://www.cepu.asn.au/comm.cepu/rules/fr stats.html 144 Rules of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia (128V: incorporates alterations of 17 April 2002), Rule 5.1.2, exhibit 1995,

document 091.0549.0085.0002 at 0023. 145 Rules of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied

Services Union of Australia (128V: incorporates alterations of 17 April 2002), Rule 5.1.3, exhibit 1995,

document 091 0549.0085 0002 at 0023. 146 Rules of the NSW Divisional Branch of the Electrical Division of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic,

Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V: incorporates alterations

of 3 March 2000), Rule 9.1, exhibit 1997, document 085.0222.0445.0044 at 0049. 147 Australian Workers' Union (online), The War that Never Ended, History of the AWU [accessed 13 November

2002], http://www.awu.net.au/historv/history.html; National Organising Centre, Policy [accessed

13 November 2002], http://www.awu.net.au/policy.html 148 Shorten Statement, exhibit 122A, paragraph 5, document 063.0805.0016.0002. 149

Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 4, exhibit 1999, document 091.0549.0085.0069 at 0079-0082.

152 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

150 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 33(7), exhibit 1999, document 091.0549.0085.0069 at 0142- 0148.

151 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002 N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 33(7)(d) , exh ibit 1999, document 091.0549.0085.0069 at 0143-0144.

152 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 Ap ril 2002) , Rule 33(7)(n), exhibit 1999, document 091.0549.0085.0069 at 0145. 153

Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002) , Rule 33(7)(1), (v), (w), exhibit 1999, document 091 .0549.0085.0069 at 0146-0148. 154 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 33(1 ), exhibit 1999, document

091.0549.0085.0069 at 0142 . 155 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 33(3), exhibit 1999, document 091 .0549.0085.0069 at 0142.

156 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 42(1 ), exhibit 1999, document 091.0549.0085.0069 at 0155. 157

Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N : issued 10 April 2002), Rule 42(3), (5), exhibit 1999 , document 091.0549.0085.0069 at 0155. 158 The Tobacco Workers Branch of the Australian Workers Union and the Federated Tobacco and Cigarette

Workers Union of Australia, New South Wales (2001), Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 3 1 August; Australian Workers Union National Office (2001), Summary of the Financial Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2001, 18 December; Amalgamated Australian Workers Union (SA) State Union , Greater South Australian Branch (2001 ), Statement for financial year ended 30 June 2001,

18 November; Australian Workers Union Glass and Container Industry Branch (2001), Financial Statements, 11 December; Australian Workers Un ion Technical Administrative Professional Staff and Gas Industry

Branch (2001 ), Financial Returns 2000/2001, 13 August; Australian Workers' Union, Queensland Branch and the Australian Workers' Union of Employees, Queensland (2001 ), Summary of the Combined Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 12 December; The Australian Workers' Union, Queensland Branch (2001), Financial Statements year ended 30 June 2001, 17 October; Australian Workers Union Victorian Branch (2001 ), 2000-2001 Audited Accounts, 10 October; Australian Workers Union Whyalla!Woomera Branch (2002), Audited Financ1al Statements 2001, January ; Australian Workers' Union Tasmanian Branch (2001), Financial Statements 2000/2001, 27 July; Australian Workers' Union Western

Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ending 30 June 2001, 13 November; Australian Workers' Union Greater New South Wales Branch (2001 ), 2000/2001 Financial Statement, 13 August; Australian Workers' Union Port Kembla, South Coast and Southern Highlands Branch (2001 ), 2001 Financial Statements, 11 September; Australian Workers' Union Newcastle and Northern Regions Branch (2001) , Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 22 November. 159

The Tobacco Workers Branch of the Australian Workers Union and the Federated Tobacco and Cigarette Workers Union of Australia, New South Wales (2001), Conso li dated F1nancial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 31 August; Australian Workers Union National Office (2001 ), Summary of the Financial

Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 18 December; Amalgamated Australian Workers Union (SA) State Union, Greater South Australian Branch (2001), Statement for financial year ended 30 June 2001, 18 November; Australian Workers Union Glass and Container Industry Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements, 11 December; Australian Workers Union Technical Administrative Professional Staff and Gas Ind ustry

Branch (2001 ), Financial Returns 2000/2001, 13 August; Australian Workers' Union , Queensland Branch and the Australian Workers' Union of Employees, Queensland (2001), Summary of the Combined Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 12 December; The Australian Workers' Union, Queensland Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements year ended 30 June 2001, 17 October; Australian Workers Union Victorian Branch (2001 ), 2000-2001 Audited Accounts, 10 October; Australian Workers Union Whyalla!Woom era Branch (2002), Audited Financial Statements 2001, January; Australian Workers' Union Tasmanian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements 2000/2001, 27 July; Australian Workers' Union Western Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ending 30 June 2001, 13 November; Australian

National Perspective Part 1 I 53

Workers' Union Greater New South Wales Branch (2001 ), 2000/2001 Financial Statement, 13 August;

Australian Workers' Union Port Kembla, South Coast and Southern Highlands Branch (2001 ), 2001 Financial Statements, 11 September; Australian Workers' Union Newcastle and Northern Regions Branch

(2001). Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 22 November.

160 Australian Workers Union National Office (2001 ), Summary of the Financial Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 18 December.

161 The Tobacco Workers Branch of the Australian Workers Union and the Federated Tobacco and Cigarette

Workers Union of Australia, New South Wales (2001), Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended

30 June 2001, 31 August; Australian Workers Union National Office (2001), Summary of the Financial Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 18 December; Amalgamated Australian Workers Union (SA)

State Union, Greater South Australian Branch (2001), Statement for financial year ended 30 June 2001,

18 November; Australian Workers Union Glass and Container Industry Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements, 11 December; .A.ustralian Workers Union Technical Administrative Professional Staff and Gas Industry

Branch (2001 ), Financial Returns 2000/2001, 13 August; Australian Workers' Union, Queensland Branch

and the Australian Workers' Union of Em oloyees, Queensland (2001 ), Summary of the Combined Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 12 December; The Austral ian Workers' Union, Queensland

Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements year ended 30 June 2001, 17 October; Australian Workers Union

Victorian Branch (2001 ), 2000-2001 Audited Accounts, 10 October; Australian Workers Union Whyalla/Woomera Branch (2002), Audited Financial Statements 2001, January; Australian Workers' Union

Tasmanian Branch (2001 ). Financial Statements 2000/2001, 27 July; Australian Workers' Union Western Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ending 30 June 2001, 13 November; Australian

Workers ' Union Greater New South Wales Branch (2001). 2000/2001 Financial Statement, 13 August; Australian Workers' Union Port Kembla, South Coast and Southern Highlands Branch (2001 ), 2001

Financial Statements, 11 September; Australian Workers' Un ion Newcastle and Northern Regions Branch

(2001 ), Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 22 November. 162 The Tobacco Workers Branch of the Australian Workers Union and the Federated Tobacco and Cigarette

Workers Union of Australia, New South Wales (2001 ), Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 31 August; Australian Workers Union National Office (2001), Summary of the Financial

Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 18 December; Amalgamated Australian Workers Union (SA) State Union, Greater South Australian Branch (2001), Statement for financial year ended 30 June 2001,

18 November; Australian Workers Union Glass and Container Industry Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements, 11 December; Australian Workers Union Technical Administrative Professional Staff and Gas Industry

Branch (2001 ), Financial Returns 2000/ 2001, 13 August; Australian Workers' Union , Queensland Branch and the Australian Workers' Union of Employees, Queensland (2001 ), Summary of the Combined Financial

Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001, 12 December; The Australian Workers' Union, Queensland

Branch (2001), Financial Statements year ended 30 June 2001, 17 October; Australian Workers Union Victorian Branch (2001). 2000-2001 Audited Accounts, 10 October; Australian Workers Union

Whyalla/Woomera Branch (2002), Audited Financial Statements 2001, January; Australian Workers' Union Tasmanian Branch (2001), Financial Statements 2000/2001, 27 July; Australian Workers' Union Western

Australian Branch (2001 ), Financial Statements for year ending 30 June 2001, 13 November; Australian

Workers' Union Greater New South Wales Branch (2001 ), 2000/2001 Financial Statement, 13 August;

Australian Workers' Union Port Kembla, South Coast and Southern Highlands Branch (2001 ), 2001 Financial Statements, 11 September; Australian Workers' Union Newcastle and Northern Regions Branch

(2001). Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2001 , 22 November. 163 Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), Rule 7, exhibit 1999, document

091 .0549.0085.0069 at 0114- 0116.

164 Shorten Statement, exhibit 122A, paragraph 6, document 063.0805.0016.0002. 165 Shorten Statement, exhibit 122A, paragraph 6, document 063.0805.0016.0002. 166

Branches of the AWU in NSW, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, as set out in Rule 8 of

the Rules of The Australian Workers' Union (002N: issued 10 April 2002), exhibit 1999, document 091 .0549.0085.0069 at 0116- 0119.

i 54 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

167 John Ferguson Statement, exhibit 992, paragraph 9(d), document 057.0863.0167 .0001; Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (online), Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Information Kit , pp. 7- 8 [accessed 17 December 2002], http://www.amwu.asn.au/images/amwu information kit. pdf 166

Rules of the AMWU (188V: incorporates alterations of 2 December 2002), Rule 3, exhibit 2075, document 003 0988.0127.0001 at 0020. 169 John Ferguson statement, exhibit 992, paragraph 9, document 057.0863.0167.0001. 170

Rules of the AMWU (188V: incorporates alterations of 2 December 2002), Rule 48(4), 50(4), 52(4) and 54(4), exhibit 2075, document 003.0988 0127 0001 at 0086, 0102-0104, 0137-0139, 0168- 0169. 171 John Ferguson Statement, exhibit 992, paragraph 9, document 057.0863.0167.0001. 172

John Ferguson Statement, exhibit 992, paragraph 9, 23, document 057.0863.0167.0001. 173 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2001 ), Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2001, 4 December. 174

Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2001), Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2001 , 4 December. 175 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2001 ), Financial Statements

for the year ended 30 September 2001, 4 December. 176 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2001), Financial Statements

for the year ended 30 September 2001 , 4 December. 177 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2001 ), Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2001, 4 December. 178

Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (online), Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Information Kit ,

pp. 2-3 [accessed 17 December 2002], http://www.amwu.asn.au/images/amwu informati on kit. pdf 179 Doug Cameron, Doug 's Column: Workers must have a strong National and International Voice, 8 October 2002 [accessed on 23 December 2002], http://www.amwu.asn.au/default.asp?action- LoadArticle&ID-768 180

Rules of the AMWU (188V: incorporates alterations of 2 December 2002), Rule 3A(1 ), exhibit 2075, document 003.0988.0127.0001 at 0021. 181 Australian Council of Trade Unions (onl ine), About the ACTU [accessed 23 December 2002],

http://www.actu.asn.au/public/about/actu.html 182 Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction , 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [5.51].

183 Creighton, B. and Stewart, .A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [5.51]. 184 Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction , 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [5.51].

185 Australian Council of Trade Unions (online), About the ACTU [accessed 23 December 2002], http://www.actu.asn.au/public/about/actu.html 186 Australian Council of Trade Unions (online), ACTU National Directory On-line [accessed 6 January 2003],

http://www.directorv.actu .asn.au/index.php3?0age- actu&report-tlc 187 A person who operates his or her own unincorporated economic enterprise or engages independently in a profession or trade, and hires no employees. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2002, Labour Force, Aug 2002,

Cat. no. 6203.0, Auslnfo, Canberra. 188 ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97, Cat. no. 8772 .0). 189 ABS 2002 (Building Activity, June Quarter 2002, Cat. no . 8752 .0); ABS 2002 (Engineering Constru ction

Activity, June Quarter 2002, Cat. no. 8762.0).

190 ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97, Cat. no. 8772.0) . Reported employment in this survey includes working partners and directors of businesses, as well as all employees. It specifically

excludes staff engaged on a contract or subcontract basis. 191 ABS 2002 (Labour Force: Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6203.0).

National Perspective Part 1 1 55

192 McGrath-Champ, S. , Crawford, L. , Tan, A & Kelleher, J. 1998 (onli ne), 'Women and Ethnic Workers: Issues

in the Au stralian Construction Industry', a paper presented at the Twel fth Annual Conference of the

Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand Conference, Wellington, p. 499, [access·ed 7 January 2003],

http://www. mngt. waikato .a c. nz/depts/ sm l/airaanz/old/conferce/ wgtn 1998/ PDF/mcgrath. pdf

193 Australian Industry Group 2002, Submission by the Australian Industry Group in Response to Discussion

Papers 1-5, 1 July, exhibit 778, document 041 .0313.0689.0001 at 0025-0027.

194 Fletcher T5169/8-11 .

195 McGrath-Champ, S. , Crawford, L. , Tan, A & Kelleher, J. 1998 (online), 'Women and Ethnic Workers Issues

in the Australian Construction Industry', a paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Conferen ce of the

Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand Conference, Wellington, p. 499, [accessed 7 January 2003],

http://www. mngt. waikato .a c. nz/depts/sml/airaanz/old/conferce/wgtn 1998/PDF /mcgrath. pdf

196 Strong, T10081/36-37.

197 Andrews Statement, exhibit 471, paragraphs 33- 36, document 045.0010.0735.0001; Andrews Statement,

exhibit 471, annexure 'Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and Graham Andrews Builders Ply

Ltd Certified Bargaining Agreement 1999-2002', document 010.0938.0493.0001; Andrews Statement,

exhibit 4 71, annexure 'Andrews Statutory Declaration filed with AIRC', document 010.0938.0493.0004.

198 ABS 2001 (Employee earnings and hours, May 2000, Cat. no. 6306.0) .

199 Queensland Government 2002, Queensland Government Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 4 July, exhibit 1338, document 001. 0001.0529.0002 at 0022.

200 ABS 2002 (Australia Now, Construct ion, Average weekly earnings, Jan 2002). 20 1 This information includes part time workers. Thi s reduces the average for industries such as retail trade,

accommodation, cafes and restaurants and health and community seNices, where there was a high proportion of part time workers. As the chart also includes workers in the dwelling sector, the results would

be affected by any differences between the hours worked in this sector, compared with the parts of the industry subject to my Terms of Reference.

202 Austral 1an Bureau of Statistics unpublished data from the SuNey of Aspects of Literacy 1996, cited in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Ellergy Union 2002, Submission to the Senate Inquiry 1nto the Workplace

Relations Amendment (Genuine Bargaining) Bill 2002, April. 203 ABS 1998 (Retrenchment and redundancy, July 1997: Australia, Cat. no. 6266.0). 204

ABS 1999 (Private Sector Construction Activity, 1996-97: Australia, Cat. no. 8772.0).

1 56 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

4 Regulatory Framework

There is a complex of legislation, regulations, industrial instruments, rules and codes that make

up the regulatory framework covering the building and construction industry. All three levels of

government, Commonwealth , State and Territory and local, contribute to this regu latory

framework. The State and Territory provisions are discussed in, Volume 12 of this report, State

and Territory Overviews.

2 The regulatory framework covers aspects of the industry extending beyond workplace practices and conduct. This volu me focusses on the Commonwealth regulatory framework

covering workplace practices and conduct in the building and construction industry. It

discusses the key institutions that operate within that framework.

• The Office of the Empl oyment Advocate

• Industri al tribunals

• The Federal Court

3 The regulatory framework pertaining to occupational health and safety is the subject of a Volume 6 of this report, Reform - Occupational Health and Safety.

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth)

4 The Workplace Relations Act 1966 (C'wth) is the main piece of legislation governing workplace

practice and conduct in the building and construction industry. The principal object of the Act is :

Section 3 Principal object of this Act

The principal object of this Act is to provide a framework for cooperative workplace relations

which promotes the economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia by:

(a) encouraging the pursuit of high employment, improved living standards, low

inflation and international competitiveness through higher productivity and a flexible

and fair labour market; and

(aa) protecting the competitive position of young people in the labour market,

promoting youth employment, youth sk1J!s and community standards and assisting

in reducing youth unemployment; and

National Perspective Part 1 I 57

(b) ensuring that the primary responsibility for determining matters affectkJg the

relationship between employers and employees rests with the employer and

employees at the workplace or enterprise level; and

(c) enabling employers and employees to choose the most appropriate form of

agreement for their particular circumstances, whether or not that form is provided for by this Act; and

(d) providing the means:

(i) for wages and conditions of employment to be determined as far as possible

by the agreement of employers and employees at the workplace or

enterprise level, upon a foundation of minimum standards; and

(iij to ensure the maintenance of an effective award safety net of fair and

enforceable minimum wages and conditions of employment; and

(e) providing a framework of rights and responsibilities for employers and employees,

and their organisations, which supports fair and effective agreement-making and

ensures that they abide by awards and agreements applying to them; and

m ensuring freedom of association, including the rights of employees and employers to join an organisation or association of the1r choice, or not to join an organisation or association; and

(g) ensuring that employee and employer organisations registered under this Act are

representative of and accountable to their members, and are able to operate effectively; and

(h) enabling the Commission to prevent and settle industrial disputes as far as possible

by conciliation and, where appropriate and within specified limits, by arbitration; and

(i) assisting employees to balance their work and family responsibilities effectively

through the development of mutually benefiCial work practices with employers; and

OJ respecting and valuing the diversity of the work force by helping to prevent and

eliminate discrimination on the basis of race, colour, sex, sexual preference, age,

physical or mental disability, marital status, family responsibilities, pregnancy,

religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin; and

(k) assisting in giving effect to Australia's international obligations in relation to labour

standards.

5 The Workplace Relations Act 1966 (C'wth) covers a number of significant issues for the

building and construction industry, namely bargaining, right of entry, freedom of association and the right to strike .

6 The Act retains enterprise bargaining as a key feature of Australian workplace relations law and practice. These enterprise bargaining objects, outl ined in s3 of the Act, 1 are important because

they ass ist the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) in exercising its discretion

1 58 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

under the Act and provide a clear statement of government policy towards labour market reform.

7 In theory, bargaining under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) generally occurs at the

workplace or enterprise level, that is, at the 'single business or part of a single business' level 2

The types of agreement include collective, certified agreements, and individual ag reements.

Agreements between an employer and a group of employees are made under Part VIB Division

2 (Division 2 agreements) and the union stream of agreement is governed by Division 3. The

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) provides for bargaining periods within which industrial

action is protected. A more detailed description of the bargaining framework is outlined below.

Entry and inspection of premises

8 Part IX Division 11A of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) is headed: 'Entry and

inspection of prem ises etc. by organisations.' Similar provisions exist in State industrial relations legislation. The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) contains a scheme which

empowers approved permit holders to investigate suspected breaches of the Act, Awards, an

order of the AIRC or certified agreements. 3 An org anisation that is registered under the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) 4 may apply to the Registrar for a permit to be issued to

an officer or employee under s285A of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wthP

9 Section 285A permits are issued at the discretion of the Reg istrar and are vali d for three years

after the day of issue, or at an earlier time if the person to whom the permit was issued ceases

to be an officer of the organisation concerned. 6 Permits may be revoked by the Registrar where

the holder has 'intentionally hindered or obstructed any employer or employee or otherwise

acted in an improper manner' while exercising the powers under Part IX Division 11A. 7

1 0 The powers that a permit holder is permitted to exercise are set out in ss285B and 285C of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) .

11 Permit holders may enter any premises where employees work for the purpose of investigating

a suspected breach of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), if the em ployees are

members of the same organisation to which the permit holder belongs. 8 This right is subject to

specific limitations. This right of entry operates only during working hours9 and is conditional

upon the occupier of the premi ses bei ng given 24 hours notice of the proposed entry. 10 If a

permit holder is asked to produce his permit, he is not entitled to enter or remain on the

property unless he shows the occupier the permit. 11

1 2 Once a permit holder has entered premises in accordance with the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth) , he has the right to access any documents that are kept by the employer on the

premises that are relevant to the alleged or suspected breach .12 The range of material that the

permit holder can inspect and copy is very broad and includes 'any time sheets' , 'any pay

sheets ' or 'any other documents other than an AWA, an ancillary document or a document that shows some or all of the content of an AWA or of an ancillary document' .13 The permit holder

can require the employer, which has in its employ a member of the organisation to which the

permit holder belongs, to produce any of these documents 'at the premi ses at which the

employees work or at some other agreed place' .14

National Perspective Part 1 i 59

13 A permit holder may exercise the power to require the production of documents without first

having exercised a right of entry or any of the associated rights set down in ss2858(2) and (3)

of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) .15

14 A permit holder who has entered premises in accordance with the Act may inspect or view 'any

work, material, machinery, or appliance that is relevant to the suspected breach' .16 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) empowers the permit holder to interview any person

about a suspected breach who is a member, or is eligible to be a member, of the same organisation as the permit holderH

15 A permit holder may enter a work premises if it is covered by an Award that binds the

organisation that the permit holder represents and the people who are working there are

members, or are eligible to become members, of that organisation. 18 This right to enter may

on ly be exercised during the employees' meal-time or other breaks 19 and if the occupier of the

premises has been given 24 hours notice. 20

16 Civil penalties attach to the conduct of:

• a permit holder who, in exercising powers under s2858 or s285C, intentionally hinders or obstructs any employee;

• an occupier of premises, that refuses or unduly delays entry to premises by a permit holder who is entitled to enter the premises;

• an employer that refuses to observe a permit holder's right to inspect and copy documents that are relevant to a suspected breach or who does not comply with a

permit holder's right to require the production of relevant documents; or

• a person who intentionally hinders or obstructs a permit holder from exercising any of the powers in s2858 or s285C. 2 1

17 Contravention of a penalty provision does not constitute an offence. 22 An eligible court 23 may, however, impose a penalty on a person who contravenes such a provision. The maximum

penalty for a body corporate is $10 000, and $2000 in other cases. 24 The court may grant an

injunction requiring a person not to contravene or to cease contravening, a penalty provision .2 5

18 A Registrar may, on application in accordance with the regulations, revoke a permit if sati sfied

that the permit holder has, in exercising powers under Division 11 A of Part IX, intentionally

hindered or obstructed any employer or employee or otherwise acted in an improper manner26

19 Th e AIRC has the power to revoke a permit issued to a person pursuant to s285A, for the

purpose of preventing or settling an industrial dispute. If the AIRC takes this action then:

... it may make any order that it considers appropriate, for the purpose of preventing or

settling the industnal dispute, about the issue of any further permit to the person, or of

any permit or further permit to any other person, under that section. 27

Freedom of association

20 Part XA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) deal s with freedom of association. Part

XA seeks to ensure that employers, employees and independent contractors may free ly

l 60 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

choose whether they will or will not join an industrial association and that employees and

independent contractors are not discriminated against or victimised as a resu lt of exercising

such a choice. 28 Part XA was inserted into the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) by the

enactment of the Workplace Relations and other Legislation Amendment Act 1996 (C'wth).

21 Sections 298K and 298L of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) are designed to provide

comprehensive protection against victimisation of employees and independent contractors. 29

Section 298K applies when an employer dismisses an employee or independent contractor,

refuses to engage them, discriminates against them in their terms of engagement, injures them

in their employment or alters their position to their prejudice. An employer is forbidden from

engaging in such conduct, or threatening such conduct, for 'a prohibited reason, or for reasons

that include a prohibited reason ' .3° Conduct for a prohibited reason includes, among other things , where it is carried out because:

• an employee or independent contractor is not, or does not propose to become, a

member of an industrial association; or

• in the case of a refusal to employ another person as an independent contractor, the

independent contractor has one or more employees who are not, or do not propose to

become, members of an industrial association 31

22 Contravention of Part XA does not constitute an offence 32 Hence the civi l standard of proof

applies. 33 Furthermore, if an application is made under Part XA Division 6 in respect of the

conduct of a person or an industrial association, the alleged reason for the conduct is

presumed unless the respondent proves otherWise 34 f\pplications for relief may be made to

the Federal Court, which may make one or more orders, including orders requiring the payment

of appropriate compensation, or orders imposing a penalty of up to $2000 for an individual, or

up to $1 0 000 for a corporation. 35

23 Part XA Division 5 forbids industrial associations, and their officers and members, from

engaging in various forms of victimisation 36 They must not advise, encourage or incite an

employer to take action that would contravene s298K of the Workplace Relations Act 2996

(C 'wth). 37 For the purposes of Part XA an industrial organisation is responsible for the actions

of its officers or agents38 Remedies for breaches of Part XA include the imposition of financial penalties, reinstatement, payment of compensation and injunctions (inc luding interim

injunctions) 39 Other orders may be made 40

24 Part VIB (Certified Agreements) provides protection for both employees and employers

negotiating a certified agreement. In negotiating an agreement under Divisions 2 or 3 of Part

VIB of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), employers must not discriminate against

employees on the grounds that they do not belong to a union, or a particular union 41 Part VIB

Division 9 (s 170NC) prohibits coercion in relation to making, varying , terminating or extending

the nominal expiry date of an agreement under Division 2 or 3 of Part VIB 4 2 Industrial

associations are prohibited from taking or threatening to take industrial action against an

employer to that end 43 An injunction may be granted requiring a person not to contravene or

to cease contravening a provision such as s170NC 44

National Perspective Part 1 6

Right to strike

25 Australia's federal structure and common law make it almost impossible to specify the

circumstances in which employees and un ions will be legal ly entitled to engage in industrial

action. The law in relation to industrial action in Australia has been affected, influenced and

shaped by the common law, by Commonwealth, State and Territory legislation, by jurisprudence of the courts and industrial tribunals, and by Australia's international obligations.

26 The forms of industrial action engaged in by participants in the building and construction

industry are many and varied. Industrial action here refers to action taken by employers,

employees and their representative organisations which affects the performance of work, and

which is engaged in for the purpose of supporting or advancing some workplace or other

cause. Industrial action in the building and construction industry typically involves strikes, bans, limitations and restrictions on work, or threats to engage in same.

27 Except in the case of 'protected action' most forms of industrial action will offend against the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), State industrial relations legislation or some other

statutory prohibition, or constitute an industrial or other tort, a breach of contract or a criminal offence.

28 There is, at the Federal level and in some States, a statutory right to engage in limited forms of

industrial action, most notably 'protected action' during periods of bargaining with respect to

enterprise agreements. In so far as a 'right' to engage in industrial action might be said to exist

under Australian law, however, it is mostly a negative or residual right, permitted only to the

extent that it has not been comprehended by the common law or prohibited by legislation.

29 Despite the fact that most forms of industrial action are unlawful, the principal piece of Federal

legislation, the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), does not specify the circumstances in

which industrial action is allowed or prohibited. Although it is silent as to most forms of

industrial action, the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) does touch in various ways on the rights and obligations of employers, employees and unions in respect of industrial action. The

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) will not apply to all industrial disputes on all building and

construction sites. It will, however, generally apply to 'industrial action' as that term is defined in s4(1) of the Act.

Application of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) to industrial action

30 The application of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) to industrial action on building and

construction sites depends principally on whether the action in question falls within the scope

of the definition of 'industrial action' in s4(1 ).

31 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) has potential application to industrial action taken

by employers, employees or their representative organisations where:

• the action concerns the terms or conditions of work prescribed by a Federal award, an order of the AIRC, a federally certified agreement or Australian Workplace Agreement

(AWA) , or an award, determination or order made by another tribunal under a law of the

Commonwealth or otherwise by or under a law of the Commonwealth; 45

1 62 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• the action is taken in connection with an actual , threatened , impending or probable

industrial dispute which extends beyond the li mits of any one State and that is about

matters pertaining to the relationship between employers and employees (including

demarcation disputes), or with a situation that is likely to give rise to such a dispute; 46

• the action involves employees of the Commonwealth or a constitutional corporation , or

persons employed in a Territory, failing or refusing to attend fo r work or to perform any work at all; 47 or

• the action involves persons who are members of an organisation registered under the Act

who fail or refuse to attend for work or to perform any work at all in accordance with a

decision made or directi on given by the organisation , the committee of management of

the organisation , or an officer or group of members of the organisation actin g in that capacity. 48

32 Relevant action is:

• the perform ance of work in a manner different from that in which it is customari ly

performed , or the adoption of a practice in relation to work, the resu lt of which is a

restri ction or limitation on , or a delay in , the performance of the work;

• a ban , limitation or restriction on the performance of work, or on acceptance of or offering

for work; or

• a failure or refusal by persons to attend for work , or a failu re or refusal to perform any

work at all by persons who attend for work.

33 The definition of 'industrial acti on ' in the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) does not

include action which is authorised or agreed to by the employer or employees, or action taken

by an employee based on a reasonab le concern about an imminent risk to his or her health or

safety, provided that the employee has not unreasonably failed to comply with a direction of his

or her employer to perform other avai lable work that is safe and appropriate 49

Authorised industrial action under the Workplac e Relations Act 1996 (C'wth)

34 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) expressly authori ses industrial action in certain

limited circumstances: employers , employees and unions are entitled to engage in 'protected

action' during bargaining periods for certified agreements; 50 and employers and employees

may engage in 'AWA industrial action' for the purpose of compelling or inducing an employer

or employee to make an AWA, on particular terms and conditions. 5 1

35 Broadly speaking, 'protected action ' is industrial action taken for the purpose of supporting or

advancing claim s made in respect of a proposed certified agreement during a validly initiated

bargaining period. To be protected, the action may only be taken by a union that is a

negotiating party and its members, officers and employees, and employees and employers

who are negotiating parties 52

36 'Protected action ' carries a number of benefits, namely:

• ord ers made by the AIRC under s127 do not apply to protected action;53

National Perspective Part 1 1 63

• under si70MT(2) of the Act, no action lies under any written or unwritten law of a State or

Territory in respect of protected action unless the action has involved or is likely to involve

personal injury, wilful or reckless destruction of or damage to property, or the unlawful

taking , keeping or use of property; 54

• employers must not dismiss or detrimentally alter the position of an employee for

engaging or threatening to engage in protected action; 55 employers may, however, stand

down employees, refuse to pay employees for not performing work as directed , or engage in protected action of their own. 56

37 Action will not be protected where it involves a secondary boycott (si70MM), until the nomin al

expiry date of a certified agreement has passed (s170MN), or certain wri tten notice of such

action is given by the negotiating party (si70MO).

Prohibited industrial action under the Workplace Relations Act

38 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) contains two important express prohibitions on

industrial action.

• Section 170MN of the Act prohibits industrial action by employees, unions and uni on

offi cials where there is a certified agreement in force by which the employees or unions

are bound which has not reached its nominal expiry date, where the action is engaged in

for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims against the employer in respect of

employees whose employment is subject to the certified agreement. The limitation as to

purpose in si70MN substantially limits its scope.

• Section 170VU(I) of the Act prohibits employees, during the period of an AWA and before its nominal expiry date, from engaging in industrial action in relation to the

employment to which the AWA relates . Under si70VU(2), an employer must not lock out

an employee for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims in respect of the

employee's employment during the period of operation of an AWA before its nominal

expiry date.

39 Those provisions aside, the Workplace Relations Act (C'wth) does not contain express

prohibitions on other form s of industrial action.

40 Part XA of the Workplace Relations Act (C'wth) is concerned with freedom of association. Thi s

Part contains various limitations on industrial action taken fo r the purpose of infringing freedom

of association .

Section 127 orders

41 The Australian Industrial Relations Commission may make orders under sl27 of the Workplace

Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) that industrial action stop or not occur of its own motion or on the

application of a party to th e industrial dispute, a person who is directly affected or who is likely

to be directly affected by the industrial action, or an organisation of wh ich such a person is a member. 57 A person to whom an order under sl27(1) is expressed to apply must comply with

the order. 58 An order under s 127 that industrial action stop or not occur is grounded on an

industrial dispute, negotiations for an agreement under Division 2 of Part VIB , or work that is regulated by an award or a certified agreement.

I 64 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Strike pay

42 Under s187 AA(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), employers are generally

proh ibited from making payments to employees in relation to periods during which the

employees were engaged in industrial action . Under s187 AA(2), employees must not accept

such payments from an employer. Contravention of these provisions is not an offence, but a

court may grant a range of relief for contravention, including fines not exceeding $10 000, orders for compensation, and injunctions 59

Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth)

43 Part IV of the Trade Practices Act 197 4 (C'wth) concerns restrictive trade practices. The policy

objectives of this Part:

... can be described by saying that it contains provisions which proscribe and regulate

agreements and conduct and which are aimed at procuring and maintaining competition in trade and commerce. 60

44 The Trade Practices Act 19 7 4 (C 'wth) covers some areas of restrictive trade practices in the

bui lding and construction industry but not all. In particular, workplace relations and enterprise

bargaining issues are exempt from Part IV of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth) under

s5 1 (2)(a) . Th e Trade Practices Act 1974 (C 'wth) does impact on workplace relations through its

prohibition on both primary and secondary boycotts 5 1 These prohibiti ons, concerning unlawful

industrial action, were restored to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C 'wth) by the Workplace

Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996 (C'wth). Section 60 of the Trade

Practices Act 1974 (C 'wth) also applies to workplace relations issues. This section prohibits a

corporation from using physical or undue harassment or coercion in connection with the supply

or possible supply of goods or services to a consumer or the payment for goods or services by a consumer. 62

45 Trade unions were initially exempt from the operati on of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C 'wth).

in 1 g75 the Trade Practices Review Committee (the Swanson Committee) recommended that

protection should be afforded to businesses that were affected by industrial action through

their dealings with another business that was the target of the industrial action. As a result ,

s45 D, which prohibited secondary boycotts, was inserted into the Trade Practices Act 1974

(C'wth). The provision was used, usually to obtain an injunction restraining persons from

engaging in such conduct.

46 The effect of s45D is to prohibit various kinds of conduct engaged in by one party in concert

with another, that has the effect of interfering with the provision of supply of goods or services

to or by a target employer. It requires the purpose of the conduct to be to cause loss or lessen

competition; and that the conduct did cause, or was likely to cause, loss or lessen competition .

Section 51 (2)(a) exemption

47 Section 51 (2)(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth) exempts from Part IV, 'any act done,

or any provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding that relates to the remuneration,

conditions of employment, hours of work or working conditions of employees ' 63 In the

absence of the exemption in s5 1 (2)(a), certain employment agreements may breach Part IV of

National Perspective Part 1 I 65

the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth), 64 for example, the price fixing provisions under s45A or

unconscionable conduct provisions under s51 AC of the Act.

48 The National Competition Council stated the objective of s51 (2)(a) as being:

Boycotts

.. to excise the labour market from goods and services markets for the purposes of

applying competition law, supporting a public policy observed both nationally and

internationally that labour markets are treated differently to markets for goods and non ­

labour services. This policy is reflected in the mechanisms and institutions in place under

Federal and State industrial relations legislation, international agreements relating to

labour that recognise collective bargaining and the exemption of employment matters

from competition laws in countries with regulatory and legal systems comparable to Australia's. 65

49 Section 45D(1) covers secondary boycotts engaged in for the purpose of or likely to have the

effect of causing substantial loss or damage. Under s45D(1 ), one person (A) must not engage

in conduct, in concert with another person (B), which:

• hinders or prevents a third person (C) either supplying goods or services to a fourth

person (D) or acquiring goods or services from D; and

• is eng aged in for the purpose (it need not be the main purpose), and would have or be likely to have the effect, of causing substantial loss or damage to the business of D.

50 Th is section will apply if Dis a corporation, or if Cis a corporation and D is not a corporation,

where the conduct would be likely to have the effect of causing substantial loss or damage to

the business of C. D must not be an employer of A or B.

51 Section 45 DA rep licates s45D, but applies where the conduct engaged in is for the purpose,

and would have or be likely to have the effect, of causing a substantial lessening of competition in any market in wh ich D supplies or acquires goods or services . This section will apply where

C or D or both are corporations, and where the conduct would have or be likely to have the

effect of cau sin g substantial loss or damage to th e business of the party that is a corporation .

Again , D must not be an employer of A or B.

52 Section 45DB prohibits a person (A) from acting in concert with another (B) for the purpose and

having the effect, or likely to have the effect, of preventing or substantially hindering a third

person (C) from engaging in trade or commerce involving the movement of goods between

Australia and places outside Australia.

53 C must not be an employer of either A or B. Again , it is sufficient that the purpose be one of the purposes for the action being taken.

54 Th e Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth) contai ns a number of defences to these provisions66 and provides a mechanism to determine whether an employee association may be held liable for

the actions of its members or officials67

55 Section 77 confers upon the ACCC the power to seek orders for penalties contemplated by

s76 6 8 The Trade Practices Commission (TPC) did so twice in respect of participants in the

1 66 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

building and construction industry, in August and December 1977, when it instituted

proceedings in the Federal Court against unions. The TPC alleged that the unions had engaged

in secondary boycott action against companies that had not entered into enterprise bargaining agreements with the union. On each occasion the matter was resolved by consent, with the

Federal Court making declaratory and injunctive orders, and, in one case, an award of

compensation. 69 The secondary boycott provisions have been invoked infrequently in the building and construction industry.

Other Acts

56 The re are a number of pieces of Commonwealth legislation which, while not directly targeting the buildin g and construction industry, affect working arrangements and entitlements within the industry.

• Taxation obligations are governed by the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (C'wth) and

the New Business Tax System (Alienation of Personal Services Income) Act 2000 (C'wth) .

• The main superannuation legislation is the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration)

Act 1992 (C 'wth); the Superannuation Guarantee Charge Act 1992 (C'wth); the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (C 'wth); and the Superannuation

(Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (C'wth). In additi on, the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth) enables federal awards to regulate minimum superannuation arrangements. ?o

• Employment of foreign nationals is governed by the .Migration Act 1958 (C'wth) .

57 In addition, management of bu il ding and construction corporations are governed by the Corporations Act 2001 (C'wth).

National Construction Code

58 In support of the Workplace Relations Act 1966 (C 'wth), the Commonwealth introduced a National Construction Code? 1 The Code aims to promote best practice in the building and

construction industry. The National Construction Code is the central code within the industry,

with no government of any State or Territory proclaiming a Code inconsistent with it.

59 The Commonwealth Government, as a capital provider, is able to set requirements that affect work arrangements. All parties invited to express interest in any Commonwealth construction

project must be informed of the application of the Nati onal Construction Code to the project.

Failure to demonstrate compliance with the Code could resu lt in the deprivation of the right to

deal with government, with disadvantageous commercial consequences.

Awards

60 The major Federal Awards applying to the building and construction industry include:

• the National Building and Construction Industry Award 2000;

• the Plumbing Tra des (Southern States) Construction Award 1999;

• the Plumbing Industry (OLD and WA.) Award 1999;

National Perspective Part 1 167

• the National Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Industry Award

1998;and

• the Spnnkler Pipe Fitters Award 1998.

61 The various Awards, made un der th e Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), contain a safety

net of allowable Award mattersn

62 The National Building and Construction Industry Award applies to and is binding upon :

• the CFMEU and its officers and members employed by employers respondent to the Award;

• the AWU in respect of carpenters and joiners who are employed by the Crown or local

government authorities respondent to the Award in New South Wales (exc luding the

County of Yancowinna), South Australia, Tasmania and Victoria; and

• the employers and organisations of employers respondent to the Award in respect of

their employees or employees of their members within the classifications contained in the

Award whether members of the CFMEU or not. 73

63 The Award applies to the employment of persons engaged on construction work as labourers,

tradespersons or operators. It defines construction work as all work performed under the

Award 'in connection with the erection, repair, renovation , maintenance, ornamentation and

demolition of buildings or structures , including the making, assembling or fixing of any material

necessitating the use of tradesperson's tools or machines including all work performed by stonemasonry classifications (provided that in South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia and

Queensland work in stonemasonry yard s and/or shops and in cemeteries is not regarded as

construction work) and the pre-fabrication of a building in an open yard ' ? 4

64 Th e Award is high ly prescriptive. It contains a wide range of allowances, special rates and detail

in respect of ro stered days off, crib time, overtime, special time, shift work , weekend work and

a dispute resolution procedure.

Bargaining framework

65 There has been a significant shift from award coverage to the use of collective agreements in

that section of the building and construction industry falling within the Commission's terms of

reference . The use of collective agreements generally takes the form of pattern bargaining.

66 Pattern bargaining is effected by agreements struck at four levels - industry, sector, projects

and the enterprise. The dominance of industry and project level agreements (derived from

activities of head contractors, employer associations and trade unions) means that, in practice,

there is little genuine enterprise bargaining occurring on major building and construction industry sites. 75 Subcontractors employ up to 95 per cent of labour on major building sites but

do not participate in these negotiations. Bargaining occurs at a national level between the

CFMEU and major head contractors. 76 In some States, the outcome of industry level negotiations is reflected in an industry ag reem en t which, in turn , is reflected in a pattern

enterprise agreement. Subcontractors are usually compelled to sign the pattern enterprise

1 68 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

agreement to work on major sites. Information on key features of construction industry

agreements is inclu ded at annexure 3 of Volume 4 of this report, National Perspective Part 2.

Enterprise bargaining

67 Enterprise bargaining has existed in Australia for many years without any formal legislative or

industrial tribunal fiat. Enterprise bargaining means:

Negotiations between an employer and its employees (or their representatives) to

formulate an agreement on pay and working conditions for a specific enterprise. 77

68 What is comparatively new is the more formal recognition and encouragement of enterprise

bargaining and enterprise agreements by industrial tribunals and legislation in Australia. Since

1 995 the Commonwealth and every State has passed legislation embracing enterprise

bargaining . Thi s was intended to produce a decentralised structure of determination of

employment conditions. 78

The Industrial Relations Reform Act 1993 (C'wth)

69 In 1 994 the Industrial Relations Reform Act 1993 (C'wth) introduced some major changes to

the Federal industrial relations system including:

• structural changes to institutions;

• enterprise bargaining;

• limited protected industrial action; and

• a floor of minimum rights.

70 The Industrial Relations Court of Australia was established to take over the jurisdiction of the

Industrial Divi sion of the Federal Court.

71 The changes provided a new focus on enterprise ag reements. It provided for two methods of

agreement being reached, one between an employer and its employees, and the other

between the employer and an employee association. It brought into Australian law for the first

time a form of enterprise agreement, known as the 'enterprise flexibility agreement', which

enabled employees and employers to negotiate an agreement and have the agreement

registered. There was no necessity for there to be an industrial dispute. The Act relied on heads

of power in the Constitution additional to the 'conciliation and arbitration' power of s51 (xxxv) .

72 The two methods of bargaining were the predecessors to Division 2 and Division 3 Certified

Agreements, of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth).

The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth)

73 The Industrial Relations Act 1988 (C'wth) was amended and retitled the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C 'wth) by the Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996 (C'wth). The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth):

• affi rmed and advanced a new commitment to enterprise bargaining;

• introduced individual agreements, the Australian Workplace Agreements;

National Perspective Part 1 I 69

• retained the notion of protected action and a measu re of immunity from liabi lity for

industrial action; and

• reintroduced the secondary boycott provisions into the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C 'wth).

7 4 Relevant sections of the current Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) are at attachment 5.

75 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) had as one of its aims the simplification of awards

made by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. It restricted awards to 20 allowable

award matters, which establi shed a safety net of minimum wages and conditions, leaving all

other matters, including above award conditions, open to negotiation. Enterprise flexibility

agreements were repl aced by agreements made between an employer and its employees

under Part VIB Division 2 (s 170LK agreements) and agreements with an organisation of

employees (s170LJ agreements).

76 Part VIB provides for Certified Agreements to be made between an employer and one or more

employee organisations, or between an employer and a valid majority of employees whose

employment, at the time, wi ll be subject to the Agreement. 79 In the case of a new business

wh ich does not yet have any employees, a 'Greenfields' Certified Agreement can be made

between the employer and one or more employee organisations with entitlement to represent the interests of one or more persons likely to be employed by the employer.so

77 The formal process of negotiations for a Certified Agreement under the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C'wth) are begun by the employer, or an organisation of employees, by initiating a

bargainin g period .s1 Notice must be given by the initiatin g party to each other negotiating party and to the AIRC .s2

78 Once the negotiating parties have agreed on the terms of a Certified Agreement, one of them

may make application to the AIRC within 21 days to have that agreement certified.S3 To be

certifi ed by the AIRC , an Agreement must satisfy the requirements set out at s170LT of the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). These requirements include:

• that the application for certification is made in accordance with either Division 2 or 3 of Part VIB ;

• that the agreement passes the no-disadvantage test;

• that a val id majority of persons employed at the time whose employment would be subject to the Agreement have genuinely approved or made the Agreement;

• that the terms of the Agreement have been explained to those employees with regard to

their particular circumstances;

• that the Agreement includes procedures for the prevention and settlement of disputes;

• that an employer did not coerce any employee not to req uest union representation if the

employee wished such representation; and

• that the Agreement specifies a nominal expiry date that is not more than three years after the date on which the Agreement comes into operation.s4

1 70 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

79 The AIRC must certify an agreement that satisfies these criteria and can not certify agreements

that do not satisfy the criteria. 85

80 The purpose of these provisions is to ensure that any Agreement certified by the Commission

has been genuinely negotiated at the enterprise level between the actual parties to it (including

the specific employees whose employment will be regu lated by the proposed agreement), and

that appropriate steps have been taken to ensure that the agreement has been understood,

and approved by a valid majority of the actual employees of the enterprise to be subject to the agreement.

Australian Workplace Agreements

81 Australian Workplace Agreements are agreements made between an employer and an

individual employee. They are governed by Part VID of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth). These agreements were not provided for under the Industrial Relations Reform Act 1993 (C'wth).

82 Under s1 70VPB, the Office of the Employment Advocate (OEA) has the power to approve

A WAs. A WAs are subject to a no disadvantage testB6

Industry level agreements

83 Industry level ag reements generally result from negotiations between State employer

associations and relevant trade unions. The most influential industry agreements in Australia

are the Victorian Building Industry Agreement, the Queensland Statement of Intent and in Tasmania there is a Framework Agreement.

84 These agreements commonly apply on large inner city bu ilding sites. Where the agreements

apply, the terms of the agreement are imposed on all contractors working on the particular project.

Victorian Building Industry Agreement

85 The Victo rian Building Industry Agreement (VBIA) was negotiated by a negotiating party of

representatives of the Master Builders Association of Victoria, the Building Industry Group of

Unions, the Victorian Trades Hall Council and other employer associationsB7 The VBIA

provides that contractors agree that all companies engaged on their build ing sites wi ll apply the

terms and conditions outlined in the Agreement.

86 The VB IA specifies terms and conditions including site allowances, superannuation, long service leave, workcover, redundancy, rostered days off and provisions for inclement weather

and for workplace health and safety. A significant difference between the VBIA and the

Queensland Statement of Intent is that the Victorian Ag reement does not specify wage rates or

the actual amount to be paid into superannuation , long service leave or redundancy fu nds.

Remuneration rates are specified in a union-endorsed pattern EBA. The VBIA applies from

2000 to 2005.

87 The VBIA encourages parties to enter into enterprise agreements but does not include any

specific clauses addressing union membership.

National Perspective Part 1 i 7 i

Queensland Construction Sector Statement of Intent

88 The Queensland Statement of Intent was negotiated between the Queensland Master Buil ders

Association on behalf of building contractors, and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and

Energy Industrial Union of Employees Queensland and the Australian Building Construction

Employees and Bu ilde rs ' Labourers' Federation (Queensland Branch) Union of Employees. The

former Statement of Intent was signed by about 35 major building contractors as well as the two un ions.

89 The Statement of Intent specifies that contractors agree that all companies engaged on their

building sites will apply the terms and conditions outlined in the Statement of lntent. 88 It

specifies actual rates of pay and allowances and increases to those rates for the period January 2000 to December 2002.

90 Clause 15 of the Statement of In tent envisages that companies which sign it will negotiate a

Certified Agreement. In addition, the provisions of the Statement of Intent encourage union

membership among all employees on building sites .

Framework Agreement - Tasmania

91 The Framework Agreement in Tasmania was a result of discussions initiated in early 2000 by

the CFMEU and facilitated by the Master Bu ilders Association of Tasmania Inc. between four of

its largest members and the Construction, Forestry, Mi ning and Energy Union 89 There are two

statewide model enterprise bargaining agreements between the four major builders, one for the 'building contractors' , the other for 'trade contractors '. Th e Framework Agreement is narrower

in its application than the Queensland and Victorian agreements, as it is not made applicable to

subcontractors working on a particular site, although in practice they are often required to comply with its terms.

92 The Framework Agreement specifies terms and conditions of employment including wage

rates, payments to superannuation and redundancy funds and a productivity allowance. It

includes wage increases over the period of the agreement from 1999 to 2002 . The agreement in cludes clauses encouraging union recognition and membership.

Project agreements

93 Project agreements proceed on the basis that multi-employer building or construction projects

are, in fact, a single workplace (or enterprise), and that terms and conditions of employment

should be negotiated for the whole project, rather than for individual participants in that enterprise.

94 Project agreements are typically reached between an employer association, a principal

contractor and unions. The interests and rights of subcontractors and their employees working

on a particular site are subordinated. In practice, project agreements are reached between a

principal contractor and unions. Thus , the major employers of labour, subcontractors, and their

employees have no say in the terms applicable to these employees on that site . The MBA Inc

argued that the terms and conditions of project agreements frequently flow on to other sites.

Th e MBA Inc considered it would be 'extremely difficult if not impossible to stop project

agreements becoming standard' 9o

I 7 2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

95 Project agreements are used on many large capital city bui lding projects in Sydney and

Brisbane. In Victo ri a, some sites use project agreements whilst others rely on the VBIA.

96 Project agreements may be registered as multiple-business agreements under s170LC of the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). However, there are difficulties in registering multi ­

employer agreements under this legislation . The Act requires the consent of all employers and

the majority of employees to be covered by such an agreement and the agreement has to be

certified by a Full Bench of the AIRC whi ch must be satisfied it passes a public interest test. No

bu ilding and construction industry project agreement has been registered as a multi-employer

agreement under the Act. 9 1 'Protected action ' is unavailable in relation to a proposed multiple­ business agreement. 92

97 Some States, in particular Queensland and New South Wales, expressly provide for the making

of project agreements. Otherwise, project agreements generally remain unregistered

agreements 93 Wh ile unregistered agreements may be recognised under Federal workplace

relations law, 94 their legal status and effect are open to doubt. Ryan v Textile Clothing and

Footwear Union of Australia95 illustrates the difficulties of enforcing industrial agree ments that

are uncertified or unregistered.

Pattern Agreements

98 A Pattern Agreement has been described as:

a bargaining process in which unions or employers attempt to achieve common

outcomes across different enterprises in an industry or sector; for example by the

adoption of standard agreements or a specified wage increase. 96

99 Pattern bargain agreements usually have common effective start and expiry dates, and similar

if not identical terms and conditions. Pattern bargaini ng takes place on both a sectoral and

industry basis.

1 00 Widespread pattern bargaining exists in the bu ilding and construction industry despite the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) seeking to encourage bargaining at the enterprise level.

Office of the Employment Advocate

The OEA's powers and functions

1 01 Section 83BA of Part IVA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) provides that there is to

be an Employment Advocate.

I 02 Section 83BB sets out the functions of the Employment Advocate, which include:

(a) providing assistance and advice to employees about their rights and obligations

under this Act,

(b) providing assistance and advice to employers (especially employers in small

business) about their rights and obligations under this Act;

National Perspective Part 1 I 73

(c) providing advice to employers and employees, in connection with A WAs, about th e

relevant award and statutory entitlements and about the relevant provisions of this

Act;

(e) investigating alleged breaches of A WAs, alleged contravention of Part VIO and any

other complaints relating to A WAs;

(& investigating contraventions of Part XL\;

(g) providing free legal representation to a party in a proceeding under Part VIO or XL\ ,

if the Employment Advocate considers this would promote the enforcement of the provisions of those Parts.

1 03 Staff of the Office of Employment Advocate are engaged under the Public Service Act 1999 (C'wth) 97

1 04 The Employment Advocate may appoint a person who is appointed or employed by the

Commonwealth, a State or Territory to be an authorised officer. Authorised officers can enter

premises, inspect documents or materials and interview a person, for the purposes of

ascertaining whether the terms of an AWA, the provisions of Part VID (AWAs) or Part XA

(Freedom of Association) or the provisions of the Act prescribed by the regulations are being complied with 98

1 05 A memorandum of understanding was created in December 1 997 between the Office of the Employment Advocate and the Department of Workplace Relations and Small Business (now

Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR)) to clarify work arrangements

between the Department's employees who were appointed inspectors under the Workplace

Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) and the OEA. Like the OEA, the inspectors have a role in advising

employers and employees of their rights and obligations under the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth) and have certain powers to enforce compliance with the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth). These powers are set out in ss84 and 86 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) and Regulation 9 of the Workplace Relations Regulations 1996. The memorandum of

understanding specifies the areas of prime responsibility of the OEA and the inspectors and the

way in which the OEA and the inspectors should interact. 99 It provides for information sharing and referral of appropriate matters between the OEA and Department of Workplace Relations

and Small Business.

1 06 The responsibilities of the Employment Advocate and those who assist that officer as set out in

both the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) and the memorandum of understanding are in relation to:

Australian Workplace Agreements including filing and approval requirements ... ;

Application of the WRA provisions relating to:

Freedom of Association (FOA)

Coercion and applying duress in agreement making

Right of Entry

Strike Pay

1 7 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

The tndustrial relations provisions of the Code. 100

I 07 The responsibilities of the inspectors employed by Department of Workplace Relations and

Small Business as set out in both the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) and the Memorandum of Understanding are in relation to:

Application of and compliance issues relating to:

Federal awards and certified agreements

Schedule 1 A of the WRA in respect of VIC employers and employees

time and wage records and pays/ips requirements (except those relating to A WAs)

minimum entitlements under the WRA (eg termination provisions). 701

I 08 Under the Memorandum of Understanding, 102 the Employment Advocate was given the role of

investigating compliance with sl 70NC (coercion of persons to make, vary or terminate certified

agreements), Part VI ll A (strike pay) and Division I I A of Part IX (right of entry) in recognition that

the OEA had greater expertise in these areas, and should undertake the enforcement and compliance functions of the inspectors.

I 09 In order that the Employment Advocate's officers had power to undertake these additional

functions, some of th e Em ployment Advocate's authorised officers, who acted in investigative

roles , were appointed as inspectors under Part V of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) .

In addition, to assist with the sharing of responsibi lities, some of the Department of Workplace

Relations and Small Business's inspectors were appointed as authorised officers under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) .103

I I 0 Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) and the relevant regulations, inspectors were

given power to initiate prosecutions in certain circu mstances, whereas authorised offi cers of

the Employment Advocate were not. 104 The powers granted to authorised offi cers and inspectors are subject to Directions from the Minister. 105

I I I Pursuant to the Commonwealth Implementation Guidelines for the National Code of Practice

for the Construction Industry, th e OEA has a role in investigating and ensuring compliance with

the Code. The Memorandum of Understanding refers to this power.106 OEA's role in

investigation and enforcement of the Code may require 'the exercise of powers based on contractual provisions of the contract between th e Commonwealth and th e contracting party•.107

I I 2 The Employment Advocate does not have statutory authority to investigate or prosecute criminal matters. If information relating to a criminal matter arises during the course of their

investigations, the OEA officers advise the complainant to refer the matter to th e local police. 108

The OEA's operations

I I 3 The Office of the Employment Advocate includes:

(a) a Cl ient Service Network team which is based in each State and the Northern Territory;

(b) a Policy and Research Unit;

National Perspective Part 1 I 7 5

(c) a National AWA team (based in Sydney and Brisbane);

(d) a legal team;

(e) · a Corporate and Planning Services team; and

(f) a National Communications Team .109

114 The OEA receives complaints from industrial associations (employer and employee

representative groups), employers, employees and industrial practitioners.

115 The procedure for investigation of a complaint involves a number of steps.

(a) The OEA will ascertain what outcome is being sought by the complainant and will explain

the process of the investigation.

(b) The OEA officers will try to establish the facts concerning the complaint, by conducting

interviews with persons involved.

(c) If the OEA ascertains that there has been a breach of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) it will usually seek voluntary compliance from the offending party.

(d) Voluntary compliance usually takes the form of undertakings given by the offending party

that there will be no further breaches of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) . Th ere

may also be compensation payments or penalties ordered.

(e) If voluntary compliance is not achieved proceedings may be instituted, in cluding

proceedings for urgent interlocutory rel ief where necessary.

(f) The OEA can provide free legal advice if the OEA decides that it is warranted in any given

case. 110

116 An example of a dispute being resolved through voluntary compliance arose in Victoria:

A subcontractor was terminated from a project allegedly because he did not have an

enterprise agreement with the CFMEU. The head contractor agreed that one of the reasons the contract had been terminated was because the subcontractor had not

provided any 'EBA details'. The head contractor made written undertakings to

discontinue the practice of asking if subcontractors had an EBA and paid the

subcontractor for all work undertaken in preparation for the contract. 111

117 Other disputes have been resolved voluntarily, for example, a deed of agreement was entered

into in response to complaints received from Baulderstone subcontractors that Baulderstone had breached section 1 70 NC of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) on a project at

Tandys Lane. Baulderstone denied the allegations and did not admit liability, but gave a number

of undertakings set out in the deed of agreement. In another instance, the OEA obtained written assurance from Multiplex that subcontractors which had a section 170LK agreement

and complained that they were not allowed onto the Multiplex site by the CFMEU site delegate would be allowed onto the sit e. 112

118 The pri mary focus of the OEA has been on AWAs and freedom of association .11 3 It receives

more complaints about contraventions of the freedom of association provisions in the building and construction industry than in any other industry. 114 A large proportion of the building and

1 7 6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

construction industry complaints have related to freedom of association, fo llowed by coercion to make, vary or terminate an agreement (s170NC) , right of entry and strike pay. 11 5

119 Over a quarter of the OEA's activity in the building and construction industry from March 1997

to 1 March 2002 related to s170NC of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). Examples of such investigations were given by the Commonwealth.

(a) A subcontractor was pressured by a union to sign a union enterprise bargaining

agreement, and the head contractor was subjected to industrial action on other building

sites because it objected to the pressure exerted on the subcontractor. The OEA

negotiated a resolution whereby the subcontractor could continue working on site without signing a union enterprise bargaining agreement.

(b) A number of subcontractors were being denied access to a building site by a union

requiring that they enter into a union enterprise bargaining agreement. The OEA raised

the issue with the head contractor, and subsequently all subcontractors were permitted

on site, without a union enterprise bargaining agreement. 116

Industrial tribunals

The constitutional framework

120 The powers of the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws regarding industrial relations arise

primarily from the provisions of s51(xxxv) of the Constitution, which provides a power to make laws with respect to:

Conciliation and arbitration for the prevention and settlement of industrial disputes extending beyond the limits of any one State.

121 The limitations of this power are considerable and well known, although the precise boundaries

of these limits may not always be clear. In general terms:

• Section 51 (xxxv) does not empower the Commonwealth Parl iament to regulate industrial

matters by direct legislation. It only empowers the Commonwealth to establish machinery

for the prevention or settlement of industrial disputes extend ing or capable of extending

beyond any one State. That machinery is presently found in the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C 'wth).

• Section 51 (xxxv) empowers the AIRC , established under s8 of the Act, to operate by way

of conciliation and arbitration . It is beyond the constitutional power given under s51 (xxxv)

for the AIRC to act by any other method.

• Section 51 (xxxv) empowers the AIRC to deal only with industrial disputes. An award wi ll

bind only the parties in dispute and cannot be made a common rule applying to all

employers and employees in the industry affected, except in the case of Commonwealth

territories or public sector employment where validity is derived from the territories power and the executive power of the Commonwealth, respectively. 117 Otherwise, unless there

is an industrial dispute extending beyond any one State or capable of doing so, the AIRC

has no jurisdiction. It cannot deal with matters that are not in dispute. As to matters that

are in dispute, the AIRC can operate only within the ambit of the dispute.

National Perspective Part 1 '1 7 7

• The dispute must be industrial in character. In particular, the activities to which an award

can be directed, the re lationship between the parties to the dispute and the matters over

which they are disputing must al l have an industrial character.

• The dispute must be one which extends beyond the limits of any one State. In particular,

it must exist as a sing le dispute at the one time between employers and employees in

more than one State (or in a State and a Commonwealth territory) .

122 These limitations on s5 1 (xxxv) have caused legislators to utilise other sources of constitutional

power to expand the role and powers of the AI RC. For example, the power to legislate for

Commonwealth territories (ss52(i) and 122 of the Constitution) is rel ied on in the case of

employers and employees in the Commonwealth territories. The executive power of the

Commonwealth (ss6 1 and 51 (xxxix)) is re lied on in the case of the Commonwealth public

service, and the corporations power (s51 (xx)) is relied on in the case of most certified agreements. The external affairs power (s51 (xxix)) is re li ed on in the case of termination of

employment and unlawful termination of employment.

1 23 These limitations contrast w ith the constituti onal power of the respective State Parliaments

where the only limitation is territorial. The State industrial tribunals established under State

legislation may be , and sometimes are, authorised to determine matters without adherence to

the processes of conciliation and arbitration . For example, under the Industrial Relations Act

1996 (NSW), an 'arm' of the NSW Industrial Relations Commission, namely the Commission in

Court Session , is a superior court of record of equivalent statu s to the NSW Supreme Court

and exercises judicial powers accordingly.

124 State industrial tribunals are also empowered to deal with matters on application, without any

need to find the existence of a dispute as the jurisdictional basis for the proceedings. Determinations may be made to bind any or all employers and employees in the industry

concerned . The definition of 'industrial matters' , the defin ition of the employment relationship

and the definition of 'industry' are all within the power of the respective State Parl iaments,

unhindered by the constitutional restrictions that apply to the Commonwealth Parliament.

125 State industrial tribunals may be, and sometimes are, empowered to enforce their orders or direct ions wi th penalties, for example financial civil penalties and demarcation orders. The

Australian Industrial Relations Commission lacks enforcement powers by reason of the

constitutional doctrine of separation of powers.118 Judicial functions are, relevantly, the

preserve of the Federal Court of Australia, the Federal Magistrates Court and State courts

invested with federal jurisdiction.

126 Thus, State legislation and State industrial tribunals supply industrial regulation where

Commonwealth laws and the AIRC are constitutionally unable to reach. In the case of Victoria,

however, those State powers have been expressly referred to the Commonwealth . Th is is discussed below.

127 Many State awards are intended to apply to industries that have not been touched by Federal awards, but others purport to apply to all employers and employees in industries for which

Federal awards have been made in the settlement of interstate industrial disputes. In such

cases, a Federal award does no more than lay down a set of legally binding ru les in respect of

the parties to th e dispute, and in respect of the matters in dispute between them. Any conflict

1 7 8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

between these rules and those prescribed by State law or State awards is resolved by s 1 09 of

the Constitution which provides that where a law of a State is inconsistent with the law of the

Commonwealth, the latter prevails, and the former shall (to the extent of the inconsistency) be

invalid. Section 109 is utilised by s152 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) to give priority to Fed eral awards.

128 However, since Commonwealth legislation that relies on the conciliation and arbitration power

of s51 (xxxv) can apply only to the parties to an interstate dispute, and only in respect of matters

that are in dispute, the inconsistency between a Federal award and State laws or State awards

can only arise within these limits unless some other Commonwealth power, for example s51 (xx)

(corporations power), supports a provision which has an intra-State operation. Where no

Federal award exists, or where the Federal award does not apply to the employer and

employee in question, or where the Federal award does not apply to a particular aspect of the

employment contract, the rights and obligations of employers and employees are subject on ly

to the State law or the State award. It has been accepted though that in part settlement of an

industrial dispute, the AIRC may make an award which operates within a single State. 11 9

129 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) requires that if the AIRC:

is satisfied that a State award or State employment agreement governs the wages and

conditions of employment of particular employees whose wages and conditions of

employment are the subject of an industrial dispute, the Commission must cease dealing

with the industrial dispute in relation to those employees, unless the Commission is

satisfied that ceasing would not be in the public interest. 120

The legislative framework of the tribunals

130 The AIRC is constituted under Part II of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). It consists

of a President, two Vice-Presidents and such numbers of Senior Deputy Presidents, Deputy

Presidents and Commissioners as, from time to time, hold office under the Act. 121 Each

Presidential Member has the same ran k, status and precedence as a Judge of the Federal

Court. 122 A member of the AIRC holds office until the member resigns, is removed from office or attains the age of 65 years. 123

131 The AIRC may perform a function or exercise a power of its own motion, or on the application

of a party to an industrial dispute, or on the application of an organisation or person bound by

an award or certified agreement made or certified under the Act. 124

132 Section 37 empowers the President to assign an industry or group of industries to a panel of

members of the AIRC consisting of at least one Presidential Member (as the Panel Head) and

at least one Commissioner. The President has established such panels . The building, metal and

civi l construction industries, the electrical contracting industry and the plumbing industry,

among others, are grouped in a panel presently headed by Ross VP.

133 Part II Division 3 of the Act addresses representation and intervention before the AIRC.

• A party may appear in person.

• A party may be represented by counsel, a solicitor or an agent by leave of the AIRC.

There are varying circumstances in which leave may be given .

National Perspective Part 1 I 79

• A party that is an 'organisation' (defined in s4 to mean an organisation registered under

the Act) may be represented by a member, officer or employee of that organisation.

• A party (other than an organisation or employing authority) may be represented by a

member, officer or employee of an organisation of which the party is a member. By

means of these, a union officer or employee has a right of representation on behalf of that

union or any member of that un ion. 125

134 Part II Di vi sion 4 provides for appeals to a Full Bench of the AIRC and references to the Federal

Court. An appeal lies with leave of the Full Bench of the AIRC against any of the decisions of

the AIRC at first instance listed in s45. For leave to appeal to be granted a Full Bench must be

of the opinion that the matter is of such importance that, in the public interest, leave should be granted. 126

135 In Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission, 127 the High

Court stated the ambit of appeals under s45 as follows:

.. . s 45 does not require a Full Bench of the Commission to "make such order as it thinks

fit". Nor is there anything else in the terms of s 45 to suggest that the powers of a Full Bench are exercisable or ... are required to be exercised in the absence of error on the

part of the primary decision-maker.

Because a Full Bench of the Commission has power under s 45(6) of the Act to receive

further evidence on appeal, an appeal under that section is properly descnbed as an appeal by way of reheanng. And because there is nothing to suggest otherwise, its

powers under sub-s (7) are exercisable only if there is error on the part of the primary

decision-maker. And that is so regardless of the different decisions that may be the

subject of an appeal under s 45 .

. . . in the case of a discretionary decision [which is under appeal], the exercise by a Full

Bench of the Commission of its powers under s 45{7) of the Act depends on the decision

at first instance being attended by appealable error.

Because a decision-maker charged with the making of a discretionary decision has some

latitude as to the decision to be made, the correctness of the decision can only be

challenged by showing error in the decision-making process. And unless the relevant

statute directs otherwise, it is only if there is error in that process that a discretionary

decision can be set aside by an appellate tribunal. The errors that might be made in the

decision -making process were identified, in relation to judicial discretions, in House v The Kin g in these terms:

"If the judge acts upon a wrong principle, if he allows extraneous or irrelevant

matters to guide or affect him, if he mistakes the facts, if he does not take into

account some material consideration, then his determination should be reviewed

and the appellate court may exercise its own discretion in substitution for his if it has the materials for doing so. "128

1 80 Final Report of the Royal Commission in to the Building and Construction Industry

136 Section 46 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) empowers the AIRC to refer a

question of law arising in a matter before it for the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia.

137 The Rules of the AIRC are made under s48 . They provide for the practice and procedure to be

followed in the AIRC and the conduct of business in the AIRC .

138 Information on state industrial tribunals, in particular the legislative framework, awards and

certified agreements, conciliation, arbitration and injunctions, is included at attachment 4.

Awa rds and Certified Agreements

139 The objects of Part VI (Dispute prevention and settlement) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) , are set out in s88A of the Act which provides:

The objects of this Part are to ensure that:

(a) wages and conditions of employment are protected by a system of enforceable

awards established and maintained by the Commission; and

(d) the Commission's functions and powers in relation to making and varying awards

are performed and exercised in a way that:

(i) encourages the making of agreements between employers and employees

at the workplace or enterprise level; and

(ii) uses a case-by-case approach to prote_ct the competitive position of young

people in the labour market, to promote youth employment, youth skills and

community standards and to assist in reduCing youth unemployment.

140 The AIRC must perform its functions under Part VI 'in a way that furthers the objects of the Act and, in particular, the objects of [Part VI]'. 129

141 The capacity of the AIRC to establish and maintain a system of enforceable awards (through

s88A(a)) is contingent upon the existence of an 'industrial dispute' about an 'allowable award matter'. 130

142 The term 'industrial dispute' is defined in s4 to mean:

(a) an industrial dispute (including a threatened, impending or probable industrial

dispute);

(i) extending beyond the limits of any one State; and

(ii) that is about matters pertaining to the relationship between employers and

employees; or

(b) a situation that is likely to give rise to an industrial dispute of the kind referred to in

paragraph (a);

and includes a demarcation dispute (whether or not, in the case of a demarcation dispute

involving an organisation or the members of an organisation in that capacity, the dispute

extends beyond the limits of any one State).

National Perspective Part 1 1 81

143 The 'allowable award matters' about which the AIRC may make an award are listed in

s89A(2)(a) to (t) of the Act. Those matters are as follows:

(a) classifications of employees and skill-based career paths;

(b) ordinary time hours of work and the times within which they are performed, rest

breaks, notice periods and variations to working hours;

(c) rates of pay generally (such as hourly rates and annual salaries), rates of pay for

juniors, trainees or apprentices, and rates of pay for employees under the supported wage system;

(d) incentive-based payments (other than tallies in the meat industry), piece rates and

bonuses;

(e) annual/eave and leave loadings;

m long service leave; (g) personal/carer's leave, including sick leave, family leave, bereavement leave,

compassionate leave, cultural/eave and other like forms of leave;

(h) parental/eave, including maternity and adoption leave;

(i) public holidays;

OJ allowances;

(k) loadings for working overtime or for casual or shift work;

(!) penalty rates;

(m) redundancy pay;

(n) notice of termination;

(o) stand-down provisions;

(p) dispute settling procedures;

(q) jury service;

(r) type of employment, such as full-time employment, casual employment, regular

part-time employment and shift work;

(s) superannuation;

(t) pay and conditions for outworkers, but only to the extent necessary to ensure that

their overall pay and conditions of employment are fair and reasonable in comparison with the pay and conditions of employment specified in a relevant

award or awards for employees who perform the same kind of work at an employer's business or commercial premises.

144 Section 89A(3) provides that the power of the AIRC 'to make an award dealing with matters

covered by subsection (2) is limited to making a minimum rates award' .

1 82 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

145 Section 89A(1 )(b) empowers the AIRC, within that framework, to make an award or order to

prevent or settle industrial disputes about an allowable award matter. The dispute might extend

beyond an allowable matter, but the AIRC 's award (or order) can only apply to those aspects of

the dispute that are allowable award matters. Similarly, s89A(1 )(c) of the Act empowers the

AIRC to vary an award or order to maintain the settlement of an industrial dispute about an

allowable award matter. The AIRC may include in an award provisions that are incidental to the

matters in s89A(2) and necessary for the effective operation of the award. 13 1

146 In making or varying an award, the AIRC must give effect to any determinations made by a Full

Bench of the AIRC and any principles established by a Full Bench about the making or varying

of awards in relation to each of the allowable award matters. 132

147 Within the statutory framework described above, s111 (b), (e) and (n of the Act empower the

Commission, in relation to an industrial dispute, to:

(b) make an award or order .. .

(e) make an award or order Including, or vary an award or order so as to include, a

provision to the effect that engaging in conduct in breach of a specified term of the

award or order shall be taken to constitute a commission of a separate breach of the term on each day on which the conduct continues;

m set aside, revoke or vary an award, order, direction, determination or other decision of the Commission.

148 Section 143 provides that where the AIRC makes a decision or determination that, in the

AIRC's opinion , is an award or an order affecting an award, the AIRC shall promptly reduce the

decision or determination to writing that expresses it to be an award.

149 Because of the constitutional limitations on awards made by the AIRC, an award determining

an industrial dispute is binding only on the parties to the dispute and their successors. Under

s 141 (and with rel iance on the territories power and the executive power to the Constitution)

however, the AIRC may declare that any determinant of an award (subject to such conditions,

exceptions and limitations as are specified in the declaration) be a common rule in a territory for

an industry in relation to which the industrial dispute arose, or a common rule for the whole or

a specified class of public sector employment.

150 This may be contrasted with the States where, free from constitutional limitation , awards are

frequently made as 'common rule awards' for an industry.

151 If a State law or a State award is inconsistent with, or deals with a matter dealt with in, an award

made under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), the latter prevails and the former, to the

extent of the inconsistency or in relation to the matter dealt with, is invalid. 133 However, if the

AIRC is satisfied that an existing State award, or State employment agreement governs the

wages and conditions of employment, subject of an industrial dispute brought before it, the

AIRC must cease dealing with the industrial dispute in relation to those employees, unless the

AIRC is satisfied that ceasing would not be in the public interest. 134

National Perspective Part 1 1 83

152 The AIRC has power to certify and where satisfied that the requirements have been met must

certify agreements under Part VIB of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth).

153 The AIRC may certify agreements under Part VIB, Division 3 of the Act that empowers the AIRC

to certify agreements 'to settle, further settle or maintain the settlement of, or to prevent,

industrial disputes; or to prevent industrial situations from giving rise to industrial disputes' .135

These certified agreements derive their constitutional validity from the conciliation and

arbitration power (s51 (xxxv) of the Constitution).

154 Both kinds of agreements must be approved by a valid majority of employees covered by the

ag reement 136 and must be certified by the AIRC to be enforceable under the Act. 137

Section 170LT(1) provides:

If an application is made to the Commission in accordance with Division 2 or 3 to certify

an agreement, the Commission must certify the agreement if, and must not certify the

agreement unless, it is satisfied that the requirements of this section are met.

155 Section 170LT requires the AIRC to be satisfied that employees who are parties to the

agreement, or are to be bound by it , have been given a proper and adequate opportunity to

understand it, and that a valid majority of those persons genuinely approved it. 138 The

proposed agreement must include procedures for preventing and settling disputes about matters arising under the agreement. 139

156 A certified ag reement comes into operation when it is certified by the AIRC and ceases to have

effect if it is replaced by another certified agreement after its nominal expiry date or if it is

terminated either by the AIRC or with its approval. 140 While a certified agreement rema ins in

operation it overrides any inconsistent Commonwealth industrial awards made before it where the nominal expiry date has passed. 141 It prevails over any inconsistent State award or

employment agreement with some exceptions. 142

Conciliation

157 The AIRC, and each of the industrial tribunals in each State, is directed, under its applicable

legislation, to endeavour first to settle disputes by conciliation. The applicable legislation is set out below.

158 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s89, provides:

The functions of the Commission are:

(a) to prevent and settle industrial disputes:

(i) so far as possible, by conciliation; and

(ii) as a last resort and within the limits specified in this Act, by arbitration; and

(b) such other functions as are conferred on the Commission by this or any other Act.

159 Section 89 is supported by other provisions of the Act.

160 Section 1 00 of the Act provides:

1 84 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(1) Where an alleged industrial dispute is notified under section 99 . . . the relevant

Presidential Member shall, unless satisfied that it would not assist the prevention or

settlement of the alleged industrial dispute, refer it for conciliation by himself or herself or by another member of the Commission.

(2) If the Presidential Member does not refer the alleged industrial dispute for

conciliation:

(a) The Presidential Member must publish reasons for not doing so; and

(b) The Commission must deal with the alleged industrial dispute by arbitration.

161 Section 103 of the Act provides:

(1) A conciliation proceeding before a member of the Commission shall be regarded

as completed when:

(a) the parties have reached agreement for the settlement of the whole of the

industrial dispute and the agreement has been certified under Division 4 of

Part VIB; or

(b) whether or not the parties have reached agreement for the settlement of part

of the industrial dispute:

(i) the member of the Commission is satisfied that there is no likelihood

that, within a reasonable period, conciliation, or further conciliation, will

result in agreement, or further agreement, by the parties on terms for the

settlement of the industrial dispute or any other matter in dispute; or

(ii) the parties to the industrial dispute have informed the member that there

is no likelihood of agreement, or further agreement, on matters in dispute

and the member does not have a substantial reason to refuse to regard

the conciliation proceeding as completed.

(2) Nothing in this Act prevents the exercise of conciliation powers in relation to an

industrial dispute merely because arbitration powers have been exercised in

relation to the industrial dispute.

162 Section 11 0 provides:

(1) Where the Commission is dealing with an industrial dispute, it shall, in such manner

as it considers appropriate, carefully and quickly inquire into and investigate the

industrial dispute and all matters affecting the merits, and right settlement, of the

industrial dispute.

(2) In the hearing and determination of an industrial dispute or in any other

proceedings before the Commission:

(a) the procedure of the Commission is, subject to this Act and the Rules of the

Commission, within the discretion of the Commission;

National Perspective Part 1 I 85

(b) the Commission is not bound to act in a formal manner and is not bound by

any rules of evidence, but may inform itself on any matter in such manner as

it considers just; and

(c) the Commission shall act according to equity, good conscience and the

substantial merits of the case, without regard to technicalities and legal

forms .

(3) The Commission may determine the periods that are reasonably necessary for the

fair and adequate presentation of the respective cases of the parties to an industrial

dispute or other proceeding and require that the cases be presented within the

respective periods.

(4) The Commission may reqwre evidence or argument to be presented in writ1ng, and

may decide the matters on which it will hear oral evidence or argument.

163 Subsections 11 9(1) and (5) provide:

(1) For the purpose of the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, of the

Commission in relation to an industrial dispute, a member of the Commission may,

of the member's own motion, or an application made by a party to, or intervener in, the industrial dispute, direct a person to attend, at a specified time and place, a

conference to be presided over by a member of the Commission or another person

nominated by the President.

(5) The conference shall be held in private except to the extent that the person

presiding over the conference directs that it be held in public.

Arbitration

164 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) provides for prevention and settlement of industrial

disputes so far as possible by conciliation and 'as a last resort and within the limits specified in

this Act, by arbitration'. 143 The applicable State leg islation si milarly intends industrial tribunals to

use their arbitration powers only where conciliation has failed to resolve the industrial dispute.

165 For constitutional reasons, the AIRC is empowered to make orders and give directions but has

no power to address non-compliance with those orders or di rections.

166 The applicable legislation under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) is set out below.

167 The arbitration powers of the AIRC are contained in s104(1) to (5) of the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C'wth) which provide:

(1) When a conciliation proceeding before a member of the Commission in relation to

an industrial dispute is completed but the industrial dispute has not been fully

settled, the Commission shall proceed to deal with the industrial dispute, or the

matters remaining in dispute, by arbitration.

(2) Unless the member of the Commission who conducted the conciliation proceeding

is competent, having regard to section 105, to exercise arbitration powers in

1 86 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

relation to the industrial dispute and proposes to do so, the member shall make a report under subsection (3).

(3) The member shall, for the purpose of enabling arrangements to be made for

arbitration in relation to the industrial dispute, report to the relevant Presidential

Member or, if the member is a Presidential Member, to the President as to the

matters in dispute, the parties and the extent to which the industrial dispute has been settled.

(4) The member shall not disclose anything said or done in the conciliation proceeding

in relation to matters in dispute that remains unsettled.

(5) In an arbitration proceeding under this Act, unless all the parties agree, evidence

shall not given, or statements made, that would disclose anything said or done in a

conciliation proceeding under this Act (whether before a member of the

Commission or at a conference arranged by a member of the Commission) in

relation to matters in dispute that remain unsettled.

168 Section 105 provides that where a member of the AIRC has exercised conciliation powers in

relation to an industrial dispute, the member shall not exercise arbitration powers in relation to

the industrial dispute if a party to the arbitration proceeding objects. A party must object before

arbitration is commenced, otherwise the right to object is lost. 144 For this reason, a member of

the AIRC must make it clear when the conciliation phase is ended, and arbitration is to begin,

so that the parties have an opportunity to exercise their rights of objection.

169 The existence of the industrial dispute, which is the subjeGt of the arbitration, gives the AIRC its

power to make an award by way of an order or determination, to dispose of the dispute. For

this reason, the ambit of the dispute determines the constitutional vali dity and enforceability of

an award or order made by th e AIRC in the exercise of its arbitral function. 145 This is not to say

that the award must adhere to the remedy or relief claimed , but it does mean that the relief

must be reasonably incidental to the settlement of the defined dispute. 146

170 Th e ambit of any consequential award is constrained by s89A(1) that provides that when the

AIRC is dealing with an industrial dispute by arbitration, the industrial dispute can on ly include

matters (described as allowable award matters) covered by s89A(2) and (3). These matters are

listed above. In other words, the dispute may involve more than allowable award matters but

the AIRC can arbitrate only to the extent that the dispute involves allowable award matters.

171 Accordingly, if parties are in dispute, for example about whether one party is in breach of the

terms of an award or certified agreement, the AIRC may exercise its conciliation powers in an

effort to resolve the dispute, but has no power to ru le upon the meaning of the award or

certified agreement. That power lies with the courts. 147

172 Section 170N(1) of the Act provides that, during a bargaining period, the AIRC must not

exercise its arbitration powers under Part VI in relation to a matter that is at issue between the

negotiating parties. But that prohibition does not prevent the AIRC exercising its arbitration

powers to deal with an application to vary an award by making a safety net wage

adjustments. 148

National Perspective Part 1 187

Injunctions

173 The bui lding and construction industry is especially vulnerable to significant financial loss

arisjng from industrial action . The Commission received evidence throughout Australia about

this vu lnerability and the manner in which industrial action is taken and addressed as a

consequence.

17 4 The extreme financial vulnerabi lity of owners, bui lders and subcontractors (in particular) to

industrial action, particularl y strike action, makes it critical that such persons have recourse to

a body with effective inj unctive powers where such a remedy should be provided. The

Commission heard evidence of a widespread reluctance on the part of participants in the

industry to approach a court seeking injunctive relief in respect of industrial action.

175 The injunctive powers conferred by Commonwealth legislation is addressed below.

176 The AIRC is empowered to make orders that industri al action, which is occurring or threatened,

impending or probable, should either stop or not occur. 149 Orders may be made regarding

industrial action (or threatened industrial action) that is in relation to:

(a) an ind ustrial dispute; or

(b) the negotiation or proposed negotiation of an agreement under Division 2 of Part VIB; or

(c) work that is regulated by an award or certified agreement. 150

177 A person to whom an order is expressed to apply must comply with the order.151 Accordingly,

a sl27 order has the effect of making any behaviour which is the subject of the order a

contravention of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) . Where behaviour contravenes an

order made under sl27(1 ), a person or organisation affected by the order may apply to the

Federal Court of Australia (the Federal Court) for an injunction. The Federal Court can issue an

injunction on such terms as it sees fit where a person to whom an order applies engages in

conduct that constitutes a contravention of that order, or proposes to engage in such

conduct. 152 The Court may grant interim injunctions pending the determination of an

application for an injunction. 153

178 Mu nro J of the AIR C recently stated his view of the efficacy of sl 27 orders as follows :

I am not one who thinks that a section 127 order will resolve many problems at a site or

forever stop industrial action. It simply is another step in the process. In this instance, if

Trans field wants to enforce it, it will have to go to the Federal Court. However, in this case

a section 127 order is about the only step that is within the Commission's repertoire to

indicate the degree to which it seeks to discourage industrial action during the life of an

agreement. 154

179 Orders of the AIRC made under sl27 must be unambiguous and clearly directed to particular

persons and conduct. For example, the Federal Court declined to grant an injunction because

the relevant order was directed to 'industrial action ' on a given day and this failed to identify

precisely the action to be prohibited. The application was made with the intention of obtaining

an order prohibiting a work stoppage. The order was also defective because it was directed at

union members subject to awards but the relevant awards were not identified in the order. 155

1 88 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

180 The AIRC's power under s127 is discretionary. The Full Bench of the AIRC has described that

discretion as manifestly 'at large', but guided by the objects of the Act and an understanding of

the relationship of the power and the effect of its exercise upon the scheme of the Act. 156

However, once the AIRC makes an order, a person or organisation to whom an order under

s127(1) is expressed to comply, must comply with the order. 157

181 A significant limitation on the scope of a s127 order is found in s170MT(1). An order made by

the AIRC under s127 does not apply to protected action. 158

182 The AIRC has no power to enforce an order made under s127 nor could it be invested with

such an enforcement power because its judicial character would make such an order constitutionally impermissible under the separation of powers doctrine. The role of enforcing an

order of the AIRC, therefore, is invested in the Federal Court under s127(6) and (7). This

incapacity of the AIRC to enforce its own orders is a significant limitation, particularly in the

build ing and construction industry, where continuance of industrial action, even for small

periods of time, inevitably has significant financial consequences.

183 In Tran sfield Construction Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metal, Engineering, Printing & Kindred

Industries Union ,159 Merkel J adopted an approach to s127 which emphasises the Court's role

of enforcement of an order made by the AIRC under s127(1) :

In considering the strength of the claim for interlocutory relief due weight is to be given to

the fact that s 127(1) orders have been made by the AIRC and to the reasons given by

the AIRC for making those orders. The legislature has reposed in the AIRC, as an expert

industrial tribunal, the power to determine whether an order to stop industrial action

should be made. While the Court has an undoubted discretion under ss 127(6), its role is

essentially intended to be one of enforcement of an order that has been made where

there has been a contravention or proposed contravention of that order. While I accept

that there is no presumption or pre-disposition in favour of the making of an enforcement

order ... I would expect that, in the usual course, there would have to be good reason not

to enforce an order of the AIRC, given that the legislature has reposed in the AIRC, rather

than the Court, the question of whether an order under s 127(1) is to be made and has

provided that when it has been made the persons to whom the order is expressed to

apply "must comply with" it (s 127(5)). Good reason may be shown if, for example, the

AIRC erred in law, the order is shown to be invalid for any reason or where subsequent

circumstances have arisen that make its enforcement inappropriate or unjust. I doubt,

however, that the legislature intended that the Court should be required to embark on a

hearing de novo of the s 127(1) application. 160

184 The role of the Federal Court of Australia in enforcing orders made by the AI RC under s127 is

discussed below.

Federal Court of Australia

185 The role of the Federal Court of Australia in industrial disputes is a product of its place in our

Federal system, and of the historical development (in State courts, as well as overseas) of the economic torts, and later legislative initiatives of the Commonwealth. While the Federal Court of

Australia has jurisdiction under statute (particularly the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth)

National Perspective Part 1 I 89

and the Trade Practices Act 1974 (C 'wth)), it lacks jurisdiction in toti, except to the extent th at

an issue arising in tort is associated with a matter arising under either of the above Acts. 161

General role of the Federal Court under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth)

186 Whi le the AIRC is given primary responsibility under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth)

in relation to the prevention and settlement of disputes, 162 the Federal Court has jurisdiction

over some matters arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) .163 Th ese include

where a writ of mandamus or prohibition or an inj unction is sought against a member of the

AIRC , or of the Registry, 164 and matters remitted to it from the High Court of Australia under s44 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (C 'wth).165

187 The Federal Cou rt 's jurisd iction under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), includes:

(a) certain functions regard ing the protection of employers and independent contractors ,

including:

• an application to review a contract for services that is binding on an independent

contractor on the ground th at it is unfai r or harsh; 166

• an application in relation to an alleged unlawful termination of employment;167

• an application for a penalty in respect of an alleged breach of an award, order of the

AIRC, or a certified agreement; 168 and

• an action for recovery of wages owing un der an award , AIRC order, or certified agreement; 169

(b) certain functions relati ng to the proper maintenance of the affairs of industrial

organisations, including :

• an app lication by a member of an industri al organisati on for an order declaring part

or all of a ru le of that organisation to be invalid, 170 or for performance of the rules of the organisation ; 171

• an application for an inquiry into an election , 172 or into a ballot for an amalgamation

in respect of an industrial organisation; 173

• a range of applications dealing with other issues arising in amalgamations of

industrial organisations, and withdrawal from amalgamations of industrial organisations; 17 4

• an application for leave to hold office in an industrial organisation after be ing convicted of a prescribed offence; 175

• an application for a declaration having the effect of waiving certain validating

provisions relating to the management and administration of industrial

organisations, 176 or having certain other effects on the affairs of industrial organi sations; 177 and

• an application for a declaration as to a person's entitlement to be admitted as a

member of an industrial organisation, 178 for an order that a person's membership

1 90 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

cease, 179 or for an order that the register of members of an organisation be rectified; 180

(c) certain functions relating to the supervision of proper behaviour in engaging in industrial

action, including:

• an application for an injunction to restrain a contravention of an order of the AIRC

under s127(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) that industrial action

stop or not occur, where it is of the opinion that another person or organisation has

engaged , or is proposing to engage, in conduct that would contravene that order; 181

• an application for a penalty in respect of a range of provisions designed to maintain

the effectiveness of the provisions contained in Part VIB of the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C'wth) in relation to enterprise bargaining, and Part VID in relation to

Australian Workplace Agreements; 182 and

• an application for penalties or injunctions in respect of the paying, or making

demands for the payment, of strike pay; 183

(d) certain functions relating to the maintenance of appropriate standards of behaviour by

industry participants, including:

• an application for a penalty or injunction for a contravention of certain provisions

relating to the rights and obligations of holders of entry permits; 184

• an application for an order cancel ling the registration of an organisation; 185

• an application pursuant to s298T for a penalty in relation to the freedom of

association provisions arising under Part XA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth); 186 and

• proceedings in relation to offences prescribed by Part XI of the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C 'wth); and

(e) a limited role in supervising the role of the AIRC, including:

• determining a question of law arising in a matter before the AIRC, 187 or if a registrar

refers a question of law arising in a matter before him or her for the opinion of the

court; 188 and

• determining any application for writs of mandamus or prohibition, or for an

injunction against a member of the AIRC or the registry, upon remittal from the High

Court of Australia, 189 or any other matter remitted to it from the High Court of

Australia under s44 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (C'wth}. 190

188 A party to a proceeding under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, other than an

application in relation to an alleged unlawful termination of employment, will not be liable for the

costs of any other party unless they instituted the proceedings vexatiously or without

reasonable cause. 19 1

National Perspective Part 1 1 91

The role of the Federal Court in relation to enterprise bargaining and industrial disputes

Proceedings in tort

189 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) limits the circumstances in which an action in tort

under State or Territory law may be brought against a union, or an officer, member or employee

of a union in relation to conduct by the organisation, or by the officer, member or employee

acting in that capacity, in contemplation or furtherance of claims th at are the subject of an industrial dispute. 192

190 If an employer wishes to bring an action in tort in respect of such conduct, the employer may

give written notice to the AIRC .193 The AIRC must then take immediate steps to try, or to

continue to try, by the exerc ise of its powers under the Act, to stop the conduct. 194 The AIRC is required to certify in writing if:

(a) it forms the opinion that it is not likely to stop the conduct promptly; or

(b) it decides that it would cause substantial injustice to the person who gave notice if the

person were prevented from bringing an action; or

(c) it has not stopped the conduct by the end of 72 hours after the notice was given. 195 If the

AIRC issues a certificate, the party seeking to bring the action is permitted to do so. 196

1 91 This restriction does not apply to the following conduct:

(a) conduct resultin g in personal inju ry or damage or taking of property; or

(b) demarcation disputes; or

(c) clai ms relating to payment in relation to industrial action; or

(d) conduct in breach of an AIRC or State industrial authority direction. 197

192 Section 170WC confers a limited immunity on similar actions in respect of 'Australian

Workplace Agreement industrial action '. Unlike s166A, s170WC is not limited to action in tort

but the same limitations in relation to personal injury, damage to property and defamation

apply. The immunity is conditional on giving three working days notice of intention to take the

Australian Workplace Agreement industrial action. 198

193 In relation to interlocutory injunctive relief restraining tortious conduct, the effect of s166A is

limited following the judgment of Beach J of the Supreme Court of Victoria in Patrick

Stevedores No 1 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia 199 (confirmed in Tenix Defence Systems

Pty Ltd v The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union 200).

Beach J drew a distinction between an application for interlocutory relief and an action in tort,

stating that an application for injunctive relief is not an action in tort under the law of the State

of Victoria 201 His Honour held that the application for an injun ction to prevent the union

committing the tort of interference with contracts was an application seeking that the Court exercise its equitable jurisdiction.202 Consequently, s166A does not impair a party 's right to seek interlocutory injunctive relief. 203

1 92 Final Report of the Royal Commission in to the Building and Construction Industry

Anti-suit injunction

194 Even where a party has obtained a s166A certificate, there is the possibility that the Federal

Court will exercise its discretion to grant an anti-suit injunction to prevent that party from

bringing an action for damages (where there is or may be protected action occurring). This

developing area of law was considered in Australian Workers ' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty

Ltd204 (the Australian Workers Union case) and Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Master Builders' Association of Victoria (No 1)2°5 (the Master Builders case) . In both

cases the Federal Court indicated that it was wi lling to grant the anti-suit injunctions but did not

do so after the employers gave undertakings that they wou ld not proceed with the actions 2 06

195 In the Australian Workers Union case, Merkel J considered the power to grant an anti -suit

injunction. After a discussion of case law on the issue, His Honour noted that the:

court may exercise its jurisdiction to prevent the bringing of a proceeding as relief sought

in a suit for a declaration of non-liability or where under domestic law the proceeding is

not sustainable or the bringing of the proceeding is an abuse of process or for an ulterior

purpose. 207

196 No action lies under any law in force in a State or Territory in respect of industrial action that is

protected 208 Merkel J was of the opinion that s170MT(2) is a substantive provision operating

as a bar to action rather than a defence that might be wai ved 209 The effect of this is not to

prohibit the bringing of an action . Merkel J stated that:

where there is a genuine issue as to whether action is protected, then a legal proceeding

can properly be brought so as to enable that issuf? to be determined. In that sense the

extinguishment of the cause of action does not prevent a court from exercising jurisdiction in a matter concerning protected action in order to determine whether the cause of action is extinguished. 210

197 His Honour therefore concluded that an anti-suit injunction could be granted in respect of

protected action , where the party engaging in protected action has brought a suit for a

declaration of non-liability211 In such an action, the main issue will be whether the action fa lls

within the definition of 'protected action'. Merkel J noted that in such a situation the court must

proceed in accordance with equitable principles relating to a grant of interlocutory relief: it must then determine whether there is a serious issue to be tried and, if so , whether the balance of

convenience favours the grant of an interlocutory injunction.

198 The unions based their application for an injunction on the ground that seeking a s166A

certificate amounted to a breach of s170NC of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) . It

was argued that the proceedings contemplated by the certificate constituted 'action ' under this

section and it was being taken to coerce the union in relation to the making of the agreement.

Merkel J rejected the respondent's submission that the contemplated proceedings were

'unconnected' with the bargaining in relation to the certified agreement. His Honour saw that all steps taken by the parties during a bargaining period were about the parties ' bargaining

position and :

a proceeding by an employer in tort in respect of industrial action alleged by the union to

be protected action or a proceeding by a union to impose penalties on an employer

National Perspective Part 1 1 93

under ss 1 70MU and 1 70MC in respect of the action, even if ultimately found to have

been properly brought, will be likely to affect the parties respective bargaining

positions. 212

199 His Honour consequently found that there was a serious issue to be tried in relation to this

allegation. However, the injunction was not granted because the employer gave undertakings

not to start proceedings.

200 A similar approach was adopted by Goldberg J in the Master Builders case. Th e facts in this

case can be distinguished in relation to s 170MT because the s 166A certificate expressly did

not apply to protected action. Again, the injunction was not granted on the basis of

undertakings by the employer.

201 Thus the anti- su it injunction may be used to avoid the effect of employer attempts to penalise

unions, as described above .

202 The availability of anti-suit injunctions from the Federal Court may have been significantly

reduced by the judgment of Weinberg J in National Tertiary Education Industry Union v Commonwealth of Australia, 213 at least where the industrial action sought to be restrained is

not arguably protected action, since it would be difficult to estab lish that the bringing of

proceedings either in tort, or sl 27 in respect of unlawful industrial action, was unlawful ,

illegitimate or unconscionable 214 His Honou r gave detailed consideration to (but did not

appear to accept the correctness on the judgments in the Australian Workers' Union case and

the Master Builders case. 21 5

Section 127 orders

203 The power of the Federal Court to grant injunctions under ssl27(6) and (7) is discreti onary. In Australian Paper Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, North J observed that the equitable principles

relating to the grant of injunctive relief apply:

The power to grant an injunction is a discretionary power in very wide terms. The word

'may' in s 127(6) is used in a permissive sense (Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth)

s 33(2A)) . Even if the Court determines to grant an injunction, the terms may be moulded to meet the needs of the particular circumstances. The power to grant an interim

injunction is 1n equally wide terms.

The Court only acqwres jurisdiction if the Commission has made an order, but the mere

fact that the Commission has made an order does not mean that the Court is bound to, or will grant, an injunction. The grant of an injunction is an independent function

performed by the Court. The Court is not entitled to grant an injunction without satisfying

itself that an injunction is appropriate in all the Circumstances. In performing its function,

the Court will determine whether the respondents have contravened, or propose to contravene, the Commission's order and will take into account the Circumstances of

such Industrial action to establish whether the circumstances justify the grant of an

injunction. The proceedings in the Commission leading to the making of the order under

s 127(1), the positions put by the parties to the Commission, the decision of the

I 94 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Commission, and the responses of the parties to that decision may well be relevant facts

bearing on whether the Court should grant an injunction. The independent function of the

Court follows from the different roles the Court and the Commission perform under s

127. The order of the Court may be enforced through contempt proceedings, by fine,

sequestration or imprisonment. Thus, in determining whether to grant an injunction, the

Court must consider whether, if there were to be conduct in breach of the injunction, it

would be of such nature or effect that, in all the circumstances, it should carry the

possible consequence of a fine , sequestration or imprisonment. These considerations do

not arise when the Commission makes an order under s 127(1].2 16

204 However, North J's remarks indicating that the Court has a broad discretionary power will need

to be read against Merkel J 's statement in the Transfield case that 'in the usual course, there

would have to be good reason not to enforce an order of the AIRC '.21 7

205 In Inner and Eastern Health Care Network v Health Services Union of Australia 218 the AIRC

made an order under s127(1) on 29 October 1997. The order was directed against the branch

of a union, being a union which was registered under the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth). The applicant subsequently applied to the Federal Court on 6 November 1997 for an

injunction under s127(6) to enforce the order of the Commission as well as an interim injunction

under s127(7).

206 In considering the application Marshall J noted that:

The making of an order by the Commission under s 127(1) of the Act is a very serious

step. Persons who are required to comply with such an order must know with certainty

that it is directed towards their conduct ... it is critical for the purposes of proceedings in

Court pursuant to s 127(6) and s 127(7) of the Act that the order made by the

Commission under s 12 7(1) of the Act be a valid order. It is a/so critical that such an order clearly identify the persons upon whom it is binding and the precise conduct which it

seeks to prohibit. 219

207 The branch of the union did not have corporate status and therefore could not be a respondent

to proceedings before the Court. As the order was drafted to bind the branch it was not binding

on the union. The applicant argued that there was simply a misdescription in the AIRC's order

and that the misdescription could be cured by the Court. Rejecting this submission, Marshall J

stated that it is not the function of the Court to redraft orders made by the AIRC under s127 of

the Act but to exercise its discretion as to whether or not it should grant an injunction to restrain

contravention of the order made by the AIRC 22° Consequently, the application for an injunction

was dismissed.

National Perspective Part 1 1 95

208 In The Original Juice Co Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Ktndred

Industries Union, 221 Whelan C made an order pursuant to s127(1) of the Workplace Relations

Act 1996 (C'wth). The order was directed against a number of parties including the

Automotive, Food, Metals, Eng ineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union (AMWU) and

employees of the applicant whose employment was regulated by the Original Juice/AMWU

Agreement 1999. The order required that the employees cease strike action and cease

refusing to work in accordance with the Agreement. It also directed the union not to direct,

procure or encourage employees to engage in such action. The action included a picket

outside the applicants' plant. Despite the order, which was made on 30 May 2001 , the strike

action and picket continued and the employer applied to the Federal Court for an injunction

under s127(6) late on 31 May 2001. The employer had applied for a certificate under s166A on

28 May 2001 and the AIRC provided the certificate on 31 May 2001. The Federal Court

subsequently granted interlocutory relief to the employer under its accrued jurisdiction in

relation to the tortious acts allegedly committed as part of the picket.

209 On 1 June 2001 the application for an injunction to enforce the s127 order came before

Goldberg J. The applicant argued that the employees had not returned to work as required by

the order and that the AMWU was still invo lved in the industrial action . The AMWU argued that

the AIRC's original order was defective because it did not accurately identify who was bound

by the order and because an exclusion clause omitted the word 'not' leading to uncertainty.

Goldberg J was satisfied that the order was not unclear or ambiguous and found that in light of

the events at the plant, which included the continued strike action and the picketing which was

preventing deliveries to and from the plant , it was appropriate to grant an order under s127(6). 222

210 In ABB Australia Pty Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,

Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, 223 Weinberg J had to consider an application

for an injunction under s127(6) by ABB Australia and Worley Pty Ltd. These employers were

joint venturers providing services to Esso at the Longford plant. Th ere was a history of work

stoppages at Longford . Orders under s127(1) had been obtained in March 2002 and in June

2002 . The latter order was expressed to apply for three months and named persons that sha ll

stop engaging or threatenin g to engage in industrial action (refusing to attend for work as

normal at Esso's Longford site) . There was a day long work stoppage on 2 August 2002 and on

22 August 2002 there was a meeting of CEPU members on the site where they resolved to go

on strike for seven days. A union official had foreshadowed that the members had resolved not

to sign off on quality assessment documents and not to undertake other tasks which evidence

showed were part of 'customary practice' at the site. The evidence showed that the applicants

were losing $32 000 a day. Weinberg J granted the injunction on 27 August 2002 finding that

there was a serious question to be tried and that the balance of convenience favoured the grant of relief.

Strike pay

211 Under s187AA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), strike pay is not permitted.

Employers are not to make payment to an employee in relation to a period when the employee

engages in industrial action . This prohibition will apply if:

I 96 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(c) the employer or employee was or is a member of an organisation during that

period; or

(d) the employer was or is a constitutional corporation bound by an award, a certified

agreement or an AWA during that period; or

(e) the industrial action was taken, or is being taken, in connection with work regulated

by an award, a certified agreement or an AWA; or

(0 the industrial action was taken, or is being taken, in relation to an industrial dispute;

or

(g) the industrial action was or is of a kind referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of the

definition of 'industrial action' in subsection 4(1); or

(h) the industrial action was taken, or is being taken, in a Territory. 224

212 Section 187 AA (2) prohibits employees from accepting payment from an employer where the

employer is not permitted to make such payment under s187 AA(1 ). Organisations and their

officers, members and employees must not make claims for payment of employees in relation

to periods of industrial action .225 This prohibition extends to taking, organising or threatening industrial action to coerce the employer to make such a payment. 226

213 Contravention of these provisions is not an offence.227 However, in the event of a breach, the

Federal Court may make orders:

• imposing a fine on the person contravening of up to $10 000;

• that the person contravening compensate an employer;

• for injunctions and interim injunctions and other orders to stop or remedy the effects of

the contravention; and

• any consequential orders. 228

National Perspective Part 1 1 9 7

Notes to Regulatory Framework

6

8

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth} , s3 (a), (b) , (c) , (d)(i), (e).

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170L.

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285B(1).

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s191.

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285A(1) .

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s285A(1) , (2).

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s285A(3) .

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s285B(2).

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285B(2). 10 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285D(2) . 11

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285D(2) . 12 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s285B(3)(a) . 13

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285B(3)(a)(i) -(i ii). 14 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285B(4)(a) . 15

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) , s285B(4)(a). 16 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285B(3)(b). 17

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285B(3)(c)(i) -(ii). 18 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285C(1) . 19

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285C(2) . 20 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s285D(2) . 21

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285E(1)- (4). 22 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285F(2). 23

An eligible court 1s defined by s285F(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) to mean:

(a) the Federal Court of Australia: or

(b) a District, County or Local Court; or

(c) a magistrate's court.

24

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285F(3). 25 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s285F(5). 26

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285A(3) . 27 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s285G(2) . 28

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s298A. 29 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s298K(1) , (2); Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [1 0.39]. 30

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, ss298K(1), (2); 298L(2). 3 1

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth} , s298L(1) . 32 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s298X. 33

Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [1 0.43] .

34

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s298V. 35 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, ss298T, 298U.

I 98 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

36

Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3'd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [10.40]. 37 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s298P(3). 36

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s298B(2). 39 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss298T, 298U . 40

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss298T, 298U. 41 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170NB(1 ). 42

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170NC. 43 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170NC. On 'coercion ' see National Tertiary Education Union v Commonwealth [2002] FCA 441 ; National Workforce Pty Ltd v Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union

(No 2) (1997) 76 IR 200 at 221 (Vic CA). And, more generally on s170NC, see Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3'd edn , Federation Press, Sydney, [6 .87]. 44 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), ss170ND, 170NG. 45

See the definition of 'industrial action' in s4(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) . 46 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s4(1 ); see the definitions of 'industrial action' and 'industrial dispute'. 47

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s4(1) ; see paragraphs (d)(iii) and (iv) of the definition of 'industrial action'. 48 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s4(1 ); see paragraph (d)(i) of the definition of 'industrial action'. 49 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s4(1 ); see parag raphs (e), (f), (g)(i) , (ii) of the definition of 'industrial

action'.

50 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss170ML, 170MT. 51 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170WC.

52 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s170ML.

53 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170MT(1). 54 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s170MT(3).

55

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170MU(1).

56 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) , s170MU(2). 57 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s127(2). 58 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s127(5). 59 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s187AD(1). 60 Refrigerated Express Lines (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Australian Meat and Livestock Corporation and Others

(1980) 29 ALR 333 at 340.

6 1 Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth), ss45D, s45DA, 4506, 45E.

62 See Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Maritime Union of Australia [2001] FCA 1549. 63 National Competition Council (NCC) 1999, Review of Sections 51 (2) and 51 (3) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 , Final Report, Auslnfo, Melbourne, March, p. 25.

64 National Competition Council (NCC) 1999, Review of Sections 51 (2) and 51 (3) of the Trade Practices Act 1974, Final Report, Auslnfo, Melbourne, March, p. 5.

65 National Competition Council (NCC) 1999, Review of Sections 51 (2) and 51 (3) of the Trade Practices Act 1974, Final Report, Auslnfo, Melbourne , March, p. 5; see also p. 27 .

66 Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth), s45DD.

67

Trade Practices Act 1974 (C'wth), s45DC.

68 Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, Federation Press, Sydney, 3'd edn, [13 .99].

National Perspective Part 1 i 99

69 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, 30 July, exhibit 961, document 059.0082.0993.001.

70 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s89A(2)(s) . 71 Australian Procurement and Construction Council 1997, National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry, exhibit 2A, document 007.0137.0535.0059.

72

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s89A(2).

73 Austral ian Ind ustrial Relations Commission 2000, National Building and Construction Industry Award 1990, Clause 7, exhibit 171, document 032 0772 0888.0001 at 0022-0023. 74 Australian Industrial Relations Commission 2000, National Building and Construction Industry Award 1990,

Clause 4.13.1, exhibit 171, document 032.0772 0888.0001 at 0008. 75 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects , Labour Market Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, p. xxii. 7

6 Sutton, T9066-9073

77

Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects, Labour Market Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, p. xii.

78 See Sheldon, P. and Thornthwaite, L. 1996, 'Re-evaluating the Impact of Employer Associations on the Accord : An Analysis of Changes to Bargaining Structures , 1983-1993', in Fells, R. and Todd, T. (eds.), Current Research in Industrial Relations, proceedings of the 10th AssoCiation of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand Conference, Perth .

79

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, ss170LJ, 170LK.

80 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s170LL. 81 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s170MI(1).

82

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s170MI(2) .

83 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth}, s170LM. 84 Workplace Relations Act 1996(C'wth}, s170LT(1), (2), (5)-(6), (7), (8), (9), (10). 85

Workplace Rela tions Act 1996 (C'wth}, s170LT(1) .

86

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170VPB(1)(a). 87 Victorian Building Industry Agreement 2000, exhibit 2A, document 007.0137.0535.0004. 88

Cuthbert Statement, Queensland Construction Sector - Statement of Intent, exhibit 0021, Attachment D, document 082.0026.0817.0129. 89 Atkins Statement, exhibit 180, Attachment 3- The Framework Agreement 2001 , being the Building Contractors Enterprise Agreement 200o-2003, document 054.0087.0178.0203. 90 Master Builders Australia Inc 2001 , Opening Submission by the Master Builders Australia Incorporated,

11 December, exhibit 6, paragraph 140(0. document 064.0681 .0226.0003 at 0038.

9 1

However, one multi -employer agreement applying to Victorian group training companies across various industries, including the build ing and construction indu stry, has been approved- see Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) 2000, Multi-Union Group Training Companies (Victoria) Collective Agreement 1999: M2738. 92 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170LC(6). 93 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects , Labour Market

Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, p. 52. 94 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth}, s3(c). 95 Ryan v Textile Clothing & Footwear Union of Australia [1996] 2 VR 235; see also Hildebrand, D. 1996, 'Th e

Legal Status of Unregistered Collective Industrial Agreements', Australian Journal of Labour Law, vol. 9, no. 2, p . 177; and Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. 2000, Labour Law: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney, [6.195].

200 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

96

Department of Industrial Relations 1996, Enterprise Bargaining in Australia 1995, AGPS, Canberra, p. 209. 97 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s83BD.

98 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss83BG, 83BH. 99 Rushton Statutory Declaration , exhibit 768, annexure A, document 01 1.0687.0464.0007. 100

Rushton Statutory Declaration , exhibit 768, annexure A, document 011.0687.0464.0007 at 0008. 101 Rushton Statutory Declaration , exhibit 768, annexure A, document 011.0687.0464.0007 at 0008. 102

Rushton Statutory Declaration, exhibit 768, annexure A, document 011.0687.0464.0007.

i03 Riggs Statutory Declaration, exhibit 1527, attachment 2, document 007.0527.0726.0015 at 0017-0018,

0020-0021; Rushton Statutory Declaration, exhibit 768, paragraph 8, document 01 1.0687.0464.0002. 104 ss178(5), Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) , Regulation 9(3), Workplace Relations Regulations 105

Workplace Rela tions Act 1996 (C'wth), ss83BC, 83BE; 84(5) .

106 Rushton Statutory Declaration, exhibit 768, annexure A, document 011.0687.0464.0007; Copeland Statutory Declaration , exhibit 572, paragraph 37, document 098.0027.0256.0001.

107 Copeland Statutory Declaration , exhibit 572, paragraph 38, document 098.0027.0256.0001.

108 Rushton Statutory Declarati on, exhibit 768, paragraphs 9-1 0, document 011.0687.0464.0002. 109 Office of the Employment Advocate 2002 (online), Annual Report 2001 -2002, p. 7, [accessed 20 January 2003], http://www.oea.gov.au/docs/annual report 02.pdf

110 Office of the Employment Ad vocate 2002 (onli ne), Annual Report 2001-2002, p. 18, [accessed 20 January

2003], http://www.oea.gov.au/docs/annual report 02.pdf

111

Rushton Statutory Declaration, exhibit 768, paragraph 12, document 011.0687.0464.0002.

112 Marias Barrios Examination Documents, exhibit 596, document 045.0872.0147.0009.

113 Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction

Industry: Phase One, 15 May, exhibit 494, paragraph 105 , document 005.0151.0052.0002.

114 Copeland Statutory Declaration, exhibit 572, paragraph 129, document 098.0027.0256.0001.

115 Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction

Industry: Phase Two, 6 August, exhibit 494, document 100.0721.0253.0002 at 0021 .

116 Commonwealth Government 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission in to the Building and Construction

Industry: Phase Two, 6 August, exhibit 494, paragraphs 1.18-1.22, document 100.0721.0253.0002.

117 This is reflected in s141 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth).

118 R v Kirby: Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254.

119 R v Isaac; Ex Parte State Electricity Commission of Victoria (1978) 140 CLR 615.

12o Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s111AAA(1). 121 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s8.

122 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) , ss4, 9(2).

123 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s16.

12 4 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s33 .

125 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss42(1 ), 42(3), 42(4) , 42(7)(b).

126 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s45(2)

127 [2 000] HCA 47. 128 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Austral1an Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47, paragraphs,

16- 18, 21 ; (2000) 99 IR 309 at 314-15.

129 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s88B.

130 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s89A

13 1 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s89A(6).

National Perspective Part 1 201

132 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s1 06. 1 33 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s152.

134 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s 111 AAA. 1 35 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170LN .

13 6 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss170LE, 170LR.

1 3 7

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), ss170LT, 178, 179.

1 3 8

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s170LT(5)-(7) . 139 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170LT(8). 14

o Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170LD and 170LX. 141 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170LY. 142

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s 170LZ. 14 3 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s89.

144 Re Northern Territory Electricity Commission (Employees) Award 1980 (198 1) 257 CAR 812, Print E6682

(N032); Re Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia, Australian Industrial Relations Commission, Print H8985, 21 July 1989. 145 R v Bain: Ex parte Cadbury Schweppes Australia Ltd (1984) 159 CLR 163; 51 ALR 469. 146

R v Holmes; Ex parte Victonan Employers' Federation (1980) 145 CLR 68. 147 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , Part VIII. 148

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170N(2). 149 Workplace Relations Act 1996(C'wth), s127(1) . 150

Workplace Relations Act 1996(C'wth), s127(1). 15 1 Workplace Relations Act 1996(C'wth), s127(5) . 152

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s127(6) . 153 Workplace Relations Act 1996(C'wth), s127(7). 154

Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, PR919758, Australian Industrial Relations Commission, 5 July 2002, Munro J, [21]. 155 Metal Trades Industry Association of Australia v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and

Kindred Industries Union [1997] FCA 1355. 156 Coal and Allied Operations Ply Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred lndustnes Union (1997) 73 IR 311 at 316-320. 157

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s127(5) . 158 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170MT(1 ). 159

[2002] FCA 1413. 160 [2002] FCA 1413, paragraph 34. 161

Federal Court of Australia Act 1916 (C'wth) , ss19, 32. 162 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s89 . 163

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s412(1) provides that the Federal Court has jurisdiction in relation to:

(a) applications that may be made to it under the Act:

(b) actions that may be brought in it under the Act;

(c) questions that may be referred to it under the Act;

(d) appeals which lie to it under s422 of the Act;

(e) penalties that may be sued tor and recovered under the Act; and

prosecutions that may be instituted tor offences against the Act.

202 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

164 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s412(2) . 1 6

5

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s412(3). 166 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s127A. 167 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170CP. 168

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s178. 1 69 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s179.

17 0 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s208.

171

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s209. 172 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s218. 173

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s253M. 174 For example, see Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , ss253ZC, 253ZG, 253ZJ and 253ZV. 175

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s230. 176 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s258. 177

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), Part IX, Division 8. 178 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s261. 179

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth}, s262. 180 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s266. 181

Workplace Relations Act 1996(C'wth}, s127(6). 182 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170W. 18

3 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth}, s 18 7 AC.

184 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s285F. 1 85 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s294.

186 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), ss298K, 298M, 298N, 298P, 2980, 298R, 298S. 1 8

7

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s46. 188 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s82. 1

89 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s4 12(2) .

190 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s412(3). 191 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth}, s347. 192

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth} , s166A(1 ). 193 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s 166A(3). 194

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s166A(5) . 195 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth}, s166A(6).

196 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth), s166A(1) 197 WorkplaceRelationsAct 1996(C'wth}, s166A(2). 198

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth}, s170WD 199 (1998) 79 IR 268. 200 [1999] vsc 40. 201

Patrick Stevedores No 1 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 79 IR 268 at 271. 202 Patrick Stevedores No 1 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 79 IR 268 at 271. 203 DiFelice, V. 2000, 'Stopping or Preventing lndustnal Action', Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 24,

p. 310 at 336. 204 (2000) 95 IR 207.

National Perspective Part 1 203

205 [2000] FCA 168, per Goldberg J.

206 DiFelice, V. 2000, 'Stopping or Preventing Industrial Action', Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 24, p. 310 at 336-339.

207 Australian Workers ' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty Ltd (2000) 95 IR 207 at 218.

208 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s170MT(2).

209 Australian Workers' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty Ltd (2000) 95 IR 207 at 216. 210 Australian Workers' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty Ltd (2000) 95 IR 207 at 216.

211 Australian Workers' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty Ltd (2000) 95 IR 207 at 218.

212 Australian Workers' Union v Yallourn Energy Pty Ltd (2000) 95 IR 207 at 223.

213 [2002] FCA 441 .

214 National Tertiary Education Union v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 441 at paragraph 116.

215 National Tertiary Education Union v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 441 at paragraphs 99-100,

citing Gyles J in Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2000) 106 FCR 16. 216 Australian Paper Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and

Allied Services Union of Australia [1998] 321 FCA.

2 17

[2002] FCA 1413, paragraph 34

2 18 (1997) 76 IR 420. 219 Inner and Eastern Health Care Network v Health Services Union of Australia (1997) 76 IR 420 at 422-423.

220 Inner and Eastern Health Care Network v Health Services Union of Australia (1997) 76 IR 420 at 423.

221

[2001] FCA 675.

222 The Original Juice Co Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union

[2001 ] FCA 675, per Goldberg J.

223 [2002] FCA 1070. 224 WorkplaceRelationsAct 1996(C'wth), s187AA(1).

225 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s187AB(1)(a).

226 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s187AB(1)(b).

227 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s187AA(3) , s187AB(4).

228 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , s187AD(1).

204 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

5 Industry Culture and Practice

The previous chapters of this volume have described the building and construction industry and that part of its regu latory environment that relates to workplace practice and conduct. In

the following sections I discuss the culture of the industry, the problems that have resulted from

that culture and why those problems are ongoing. My recommendations in respect of these problems are set out in the reform volumes (volumes 5 - 11 ).

Industry culture

2 The relationships between parties in the building and construction industry are not conducive

to an efficient, fai r and innovative industry. There are many points of tension within this industry

and many aspects of behaviour and culture have contributed to the breakdown in relationships between parties. This behaviour and cu ltu re encompasses commercial pragmatism, desire for

uniformity in employment terms and conditions, excessive pursuit of self interest, an industry

characterised by conflict, high levels of lawlessness and a breakdown in rights.

Commercial pragmatism

3 Throughout Australia commercial pragmatism is the response to much of the inappropriate

behaviour which is occurring in the building and construction industry.

4 The commercial pressure on all businesses is great. Clients face pressure from financiers to

guarantee the total cost and timing of projects. Governments face political and budgetary

pressure to complete projects within their announced budgets. In consequence, clients do not

want to be responsible for project risks. It is usual for them to contract, as far as possible, for

the head contractor for be responsible for such risks . Head contractors subsequently pass

these risks on to subcontractors. Businesses fear that any disruption to construction could

result in consequential losses affecting their profitability.

5 The average level of profitability in the building and construction industry is low, particu larly in

non-residential building construction and non-building construction. At 4.6 per cent, the average profit margin in the in dustry is much less than the national average for all industries of

9.3 per cent. 1 This drops to 0. 7 per cent for non -residential building construction and 4.3 per

cent for non-building construction. 2

National Perspective Part 1 205

6 For all of their economic and management strengths, head contractors and subcontractors are

immensely vulnerable to signifi cant economic loss caused by disruption and delay to the

construction process. This is well understood by unions. It results, commerciall y, in a short term

project profitability focus by those involved in projects- clients, governments, head contractors

and subcontractors. They do not consider the implications that the approach taken now will

have on the long term prosperity of the industry. In 1995, the Construction Industry

Devel opment Agency (C IDA) prepared a report based on survey information from building and

construction industry companies. Th at report found:

Most organisational and industry change efforts are sparked by a sense of crisis, without

which the pressures of day-to-day operations means improvement initiatives take a back

seat and are undertaken, 'when there is time'.

Many managers were found to be complacent and deluded themselves about how the1r

company stood against best practice, not an uncommon finding. 3

The project-to-project, short-term and financial focus of the industry continues to

threaten its ambition of improving its performance. 4

7 CIDA argued that:

Short-term time frames are a major concern to the industry because:

• companies looking at their survival on a day-to-day basis are unlikely to undertake

reviews of their business, except in the context of a crisis;

• similarly, managers are unlikely to pursue higher risk strategies involving longer pay

back periods. This includes investing in research and development, new

technologies, and entering export markets. All these strategies provide companies

and the industry with a competitive edge in the future;

• worthwhile and new initiatives (e.g. the implementation of company-wide traimng)

could be shelved because the time scale required to demonstrate the company

has benefited is longer, and managers tend to want quick fix solutions. 5

8 Following from this short term focu s, businesses fail to undertake planning and investment

even when it is in the industry's long term interests. The low levels of traini ng , for example,

illustrate how businesses ' short term fi nancial decisions can undermine the long term

availability of skilled workers.

9 There are many areas where businesses are taking a pragmatic approach that results in a narrow, short term, commercial view that is not necessarily in the best long term interests of the

industry. The prevalence of 'cheque book' indust ri al relations is a clear illustration of this.

10 Head contractors, in particular, are wi lling to succumb to the financial demands of unions to

buy industrial peace. This can include agreeing to substantial increases in wages and salaries , payin g strike pay or numerou s other contributions or donations that are demanded. The State

and Territory Overviews, found in volume 12, note many examples of such payments.

206 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(a) In New South Wales union officials soug ht a substantial 'donation' from an em ployer to

help fund a union organiser's salary to reg ulate a sector of the industry. A union requi red

an employer to pay moneys to both union related and unrelated organisations in the form

of 'donations' in return for the agreement to settle an industrial dispute, when in reality

these so-called 'donations' were in fact penalties or fines imposed by the union. 6

(b) In Victoria head contractors and subcontractors made inappropriate payments to unions

and union -nomi nated funds because of demands by union officials. Union officials

demanded that employers make contribu tions to union fund s, linking a positive response

to industrial peace. 7

(c) In Queensland head contractors paid un ion membership fees for subcontractors'

employees to avert the risk of industrial action 8

(d) In Western Australia payments for casual tickets, 'specialised training ' and strike pay

were all made to unions with the expectation of buying industrial peace.9

(e) In the Northern Territory a subcontractor made payment for union membership for its

employees in order to gain uni on support for the award of a contract. 10

Self interest

11 In all sectors of the economy parties are motivated by their own self interest and pursuit of their

long term financial success. In the building and construction industry this focus on individualism

is extreme. Although some businesses foster long term relationships with certain contractors

and subcontractors, there are many oth er examples where the various parties demonstrate a

culture of individualism , and take a short term opportunistic approach in their dealings with

each other.

12 Cl ients seek to protect th eir self-interest by transferring industrial and other construction risks

to head contractors.

13 Head contractors display an emphasis on self interest when they capitulate to union demands

to avoid industrial unrest. Head contractors bear the cost of li qu idated damages if the project is

delayed due to industrial unrest. They requ ire subcontractors to ag ree to meet the cost of union

demands so they can avoid the potential cost of project delays, in disregard of the effects the

impositions may have on the long term viability of the subcontractor's business .

14 One illustration of the level of individualism in the industry is the high level of subcontracting. 11

Many individuals choose to work as indepen dent autonomous operators. The anecdotal

evidence and the statistics both indicate that there are more subcontracting businesses in the

bui lding and construction industry than any other. 12 Increasing specialisation is one reason for

the high level of subcontracting .

15 One of the strengths of subcontractors is their independence. Skilled workers often do not

want to work as employees and want to ru n their own businesses, seeing subcontracting as

rewarding effort and providing better fi nancial incentive. Buil ders contend that subcontracting is

a benefit to all parties. It reward s productivity, innovation and quality. It makes individuals

responsib le for their own well-being. 13 Unions arg ue that many workers become

subcontractors to avo id paying tax 14 or because they are req uired to by employers tryin g to

National Perspective Part 1 207

avoid paying them their proper entitlements. Whatever be the reason for the high level of

subcontracting, the result is that subcontractors have an interest only in a small segment of the

project. This results in a concentration by them on that aspect, a desire to complete their work

profitably, and a desire to do the work without disruption to progress. Their interest is not on the

project overall , but on their segment of it.

16 The motivation of those parties in the building and construction industry that believe terms and

conditions on a building site should be uniform has several elements of self interest. From the

unions' perspective, they desire uniformity of outcomes for members as a basic tenet of

collectivism . It also reinforces their own bargaining power and their abil ity to dictate outcomes

on building sites. Businesses that support uniformity see advantages in reducing the facets for

competition between subcontractors. The cost of an increase in employee entitlements can be

automatically passed up the contractual chain, as businesses know that their competitors

must bear sim ilar costs. Uniformity acts as a protective shield that denies businesses the

opportunity to gain a competitive advantage by being innovative in the way they remunerate

their employees.

17 There are extreme examples of self interest, exercised in disregard of the effect on others.

Phoenix companies epitomise the problem of a culture of se lf interest. Many, incl ud in g the

Australian Taxation Office (ATO), identified bu ilding and construction as one of the industries

most susceptible to phoenix company activity.

18 At its worst, offenders deliberately structure their operations to engage in phoen ix activity and

to avo id detection. They fail to pay their debts, act in a manner that intentionally den ies

unsecured creditors equal access to the entity's assets to later re-emerge as a simi lar business

control led by parties related to either the management or directors. 15 Such activity can cause recurrent losses to other businesses. Some operators design and plan their businesses to

profit at the expense of their cred itors.

19 In the case of Emerson Industries, large debts to the ATO, state revenue authorities and

workers compensation insu rers were al lowed to build up unchecked over a number of years

after previous compan ies had fai led, because inadequate checking was carried out by head contractors. Harkin, a formworker, restructured his activities so as to use various compan ies,

one after another, to move assets to new companies, leaving his old companies as shel ls with

large accumulated debts. Upon the failure of his labour supply company, he used its name as

a trading name for its successor. Eventual ly all the companies collapsed, except this successor

that held the assets. Its major shareholder was a family trust company. 16

20 Businesses seeking to use underpaid illegal migrant workers are clearly inappropriately

pursuing their own self interest.

21 Field operations conducted by the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous

Affairs (DIMIA) have indicated that the majority of illegal workers are often paid less than leg al

entitlements; some 17 were not paying tax , either at the correct rate or at all; and some 18 we re

claiming social security benefits to which they were not entitled. 19 There is reason to suspect

that some illegal workers are inadequately trained , and thu s pose a safety risk to themselves

and others.

208 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

22 Such businesses are responsible for exploiting migrant labour and avoiding tax and compete

unfairly with law abiding businesses.

Conflict

23 The culture in that part of the industry subject to the Commission's terms of reference is

characterised by confrontation and conflict. There are examples of co-operati ve projects, for

example the Darwin to Alice Springs Railway, but these are notable as exceptions. 20 The level

of conflict varies between States and Territories . It is highest in Victoria and Western Australia,

evident in New South Wales and Queensland and less of an issue in the smaller States and Territories.

24 There are many examples of behaviour wh ich illustrate the cu ltu re of conflict in the bu ilding and

construction industry. A major example is union militancy, exemplified by the level of industrial

action. The traditional tender process that perpetuates head contractors and subcontractors

making decisions based on short term commercial priorities because of liability for li quidated

damages increases the damage that can be caused by unions that adopt a militant approach in support of industrial objectives .

25 The CFM EU, in particular, promotes itself as a 'militant union' 21 There is nothi ng wrong with

militancy if by that term is meant the strong advocacy of the rights of its members, and

pressing, wit hin the law, for improved conditions. The problem arises when by militancy is

meant a philosophy that the end justifies the means, that the law can be disregarded, that

rights of others can be trampled upon or ignored, that oppression is a va li d tool, and that the

power to cause loss is a weapon to be rout in ely used or threatened to achieve one's objective.

Such militancy is the first step towards anarchy. Might replaces right. Arrogance and inducing

fear become hallmarks of conduct. People are oblig ed to act against their will . Mob ru le

emerges. Such power leads to illegality, and unlawful payment of money to avert loss .

26 Through the use of industrial force and threats the unions often require subcontractors to sign

union-endorsed EBAs, employees to join the union and businesses to employ particular

people.

27 While industrial action is common, these threats are not restricted to industrial action. I have

found that union officials have made various threats against the businesses of individuals they

wish to press, and in some cases against the individuals themselves. For instance:

• in New South Wales I found that there was harassment of employers by a union organiser

by making unfounded al legati ons, here regard ing victimisation and racism; 22

• in Western Australia there was a willingness by a union and its officials to make threats of

violence and harm and to damage property to achieve its in dustrial objectives; 23

• in Tasmania there was use of threats to a subcontractor that if it did not sign a union­

endorsed enterprise bargaining agreement the subcontractors would not be able to do

any more commercial work; 24 and

• in Victoria there was threatening and intimidating conduct by union officials .25

28 In practice militant union behaviour has been illustrated by:

National Perspective Part 1 209

• a high level of industrial disputes;

• the methods used to get subcontractors to sign EBAs and ensure their employees are

members of the union;

• the methods used to collect outstanding workers' entitlements;

• demarcation disputes;

• demands on businesses to make payments to union related and unrelated organisations;

• the destruction of public and private property; and

• the abuse of rights designed to protect workers' health and safety to achieve industrial

goals.

29 The last of these is discussed separately in volume 6 of this report, Reform - Occupational

Health and Safety.

30 In that part of the building and construction industry under the Commission's Terms of

Reference industrial action is common.

Of the 698 Industrial disputes in Australia during 2000, 221 (32%) affected the construction industry ... These disputes involved (either directly or indirectly) 58,300

construction industry employees and resulted in the loss of 108,800 working days. This

represents 23% of the total number of work1ng days lost due to all industrial disputes in

Australia in 2000. 26

31 Between 1996 and 2000 working days lost in the building and construction industry accounted

for between 23 and 40 per cent of the total working days lost nationwide. In contrast build ing

and construction accounted for between seven and eight per cent of total employment during

that period .

32 The number of working days lost for each thousand employees in the building and construction

industry was significantly above the national average. Building and construction ranked among

the four industry sectors with the highest levels of disputation. In the last five years, the only

industry with a higher level of industrial disputation was mining, due to very high levels of

industrial disputes within coal mining. 27

33 Unions are aggressive in the way they get contractors to sign EBAs and ensure their

employees are union members.

34 Conflict in the form of demarcation disputes among unions is still a feature of the industry. 28

35 Overall, the militant approach of unions results in absence of a co-operative approach to

construction, an attitude of distrust, and a failure to resolve disputes through negotiation and

arbitration in favour of threats and use of industrial action. In practice unions seek to perform

the ro le of industrial police, enforcing their own interpretation of appropriate industrial

standards. Conflict exhibits itself in an early resort to industrial action rather than an attempt at

the site level to resolve problems as they arise. This approach is in part driven by the need to

demonstrate the strength, usefulness and necessity of unionism. The CFMEU, in particula r,

seems to regard co-operation with contractors as a sign of weakness.

21 0 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Lawlessness

36 The rule of law has been supplanted in the building and construction industry by a culture of

lawlessness. Participants in the industry instinctively succumb to the exercise of industrial

muscle in the interests of commercial expediency and survival. They prefer to capitulate to

unlawful or otherwise inappropriate demands or to allow unlawful or otherwise inappropriate practices to continue, rather than resort to the law to enforce their rights . Insisting on legal

rights risks , at best, raising the ire of other participants in the industry and at worst, making a

martyr of oneself and putting one's business and livelihood at risk.

37 A culture of lawlessness pervades every level of the industry. Among its many manifestations, it

is evident in head contractors who agree to appoint union nominees as site safety or induction

officers, knowing that those nominees will use their position to flout freedom of association and

freedom of bargaining laws on their sites. They both condone and encourage such conduct. It

is evident in subcontractors insisting that all of their employees join the union, regardless of the

wishes of the employees, in order to keep the peace and ensure workflow. It is evident in

workers who engage in industrial action without regard to their employment obligations. It is

evident in unions and their officials who demand that every contractor on a site have a union ­

endorsed EBA or that every worker on a site be a union member. It is evident every time a

pariicipant in the industry engages in threatening or intimidatory conduct with the intent of putting illegitimate pressure on another participant in the industry. It is evident in the actions of

businesses that evade paying taxation, workers compensation and rightful employee

entitlements. It is evident in failure to adhere to proper OH&S standards. And it is evident in the

failure by parties, particularly the CFMEU , to adhere to agreements made.

38 There was much evidence of unlawful behaviour. It is discussed in volumes 13 to 21 reporting

on the hearings in each State and Territory. The overview for each State and Territory, found in

volume 12, includes a schedule of findings of unlawful conduct. These schedules are extensive

and clearly illustrate the extent of unlawful conduct in this industry. In addition conduct that

might constitute criminal conduct is contained in the confidential volume (volume 23) of this

report.

39 Civi lised standards of the kind which would be expected by ordinary Australians have too often

evaded workplace relations in the building and construction industry. This is a matter for which

every participant bears some responsibi lity.

Negotiation of rights

40 Important aspects of the industry affecting all participants are controlled by the decisions of

large head contractors and employer and employee organisations. For instance, the Victorian

Building Industry Agreement (VBIA) was negotiated by representatives of the Master Builders

Association of Victoria, and other employer associations, the Building Industry Group of

Unions, and the Victorian Trades Hall Counci l. It specifies a range of terms and conditions including site allowances, superannuation, long service leave, workcover, redundancy, rostered

days off and procedures for in clement weather and for workplace health and safety, and is

backed up by a union-endorsed EBA that specifies levels of remuneration.

National Perspective Part 1 211

41 There was no involvement by individual subcontractors and their employees. Yet head

contractors require the agreement and the EBA to be adopted by subcontractors on their sites.

The terms and conditions in the EBA then apply to all of the wo rk carried out by the subcontractor and its employees, regard less of the project.

42 In many areas in this industry the righ t of choice is being constrained. Smaller participants are

being dictated to by larger businesses and organisations. Examples include:

• the negotiation of terms and conditions of employment;

• the decision to join a union; and

• the decision on whom to employ and the type of workforce that will be used.

43 Pattern bargaining leads to the terms and conditions of employees of small subcontractors,

wishing to work on major building sites, being determined by mechanisms outside the control

of those employers and employees.

44 In reality, the employees of businesses that wish to work on major CBD building sites do not

have a choice. The 'one size fits all' approach of pattern bargaining impedes productivity,

flexib ility and in many cases the individual aspirations of workers. It assumes that all employees have the same wishes in relation to hours of work, wage structures and other conditions of

employment. It assumes that the unions know best what is in the interests of and what the

desires are of all employees, including those who have chosen not to join the union . It ign ores

the possibility that different levels of remuneration depending upon skil l and productivity,

operate as an incentive to employees to achieve increased productivity and quality of work. It

assumes, wrongly in my view, that those who are more productive or work harder than others

should not be better rewarded. Rewarding skill, application and productivity does not infringe

any notion of fairn ess : indeed , it maintains the notion of fairness. It is in the best interests of

employees to be afforded the opportunity to enhance their earning capacity if th eir

performance justifies it. Examples of th e results of pattern bargaining not being equitable and contrary to the wishes of employees and employers are outli ned in volume 5 of this report ,

Reform - Estab lishing Employment Conditions .

45 The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) explicitly promotes employers and employees

negotiating at an enterprise level. Section 3(d)(i) sets out enterprise bargaining as an object of the Act.

The prinCipal object of this Act is to provide a framework for cooperative workplace

relations which promotes the economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australta

by. ..

(d) providing the means:

(ij for wages and conditions of employment to be determined as far as possible

by the agreement of employers and employees at the workplace or

enterprise level, upon a foundation of minimum standards; and

(!I) to ensure the maintenance of an effective award safety net of fair and

enforceable minimum wages and conditions of employment; and ...

21 2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

46 In the building and construction industry these objectives are being denied by pattern

bargaining .

47 While the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) provides for freedom of individuals or

businesses to choose whether they will or will not join an industrial association it does not

prevent a range of practices which, while not requiring union membership, can have the effect

of coercing people to join a union, or result in their employer signing them up as union

members without their knowledge. Four instances are:

• the arrangements made by head contractors with unions before the start of a major

project that, in the interests of industrial peace on that project, the head contractors in

fact require all subcontractors coming on site to have union-endorsed EBAs;

• union-endorsed EBAs that encourage union membership, or the requirement that most

or all employees be union members as a precondition to the union signing such an EBA;

• the pressure on head contractors and subcontractors to sign a union-endorsed EBA;

and

• the leverage and information the unions obtain from the EBA process.

48 Union-endorsed EBAs in the building and construction industry often contain clauses that

encourage union membership. In Queensland, for example, the Statement of Intent required

that the company signing it should establish procedures so that all reasonable steps were

taken to ensure that eligible employees, including subcontractors' employees, were financial

members of the CFMEU or the BLF. The Statement of Intent also provided that where an

employee working on the site was found not to be a financial unionist, the company, and where

appropriate the subcontractor, was to be notified immediately and given a reasonable

opportunity to comply with the union encouragement clause . This provision of the Statement of

Intent is contained in substantially similar terms in the industry pattern EBA.

49 There was evidence of instances where unions have had access to private information about

individuals which has been used to encourage union membership. In some cases, unions

obtained access to detailed information about workers through industry superannuation fund

records . Union involvement in site inductions gives them the power and opportunity to push for

all employees to become union members. In addition, subcontractors may pay union fees for

their employees without subsequent reimbursement from their wages, and without informing

employees that they have been joined into a union.

50 Arrangements such as these make it very difficult for an individual to exercise any real choice,

at least on major CBD sites. It is virtually impossible for an employer to operate in an

environment where there is not considerable pressure on it to ensure its employees are

members of the union.

Summary

51 The various components of the culture in the building and construction industry are interrelated

and reinforce each other. Combined they create an environment in which many unlawful and

inappropriate practices and conduct have become entrenched.

National Perspective Part 1 2 i 3

52 The commercial pressures facing businesses make aggressive militancy by unions a high ly

effective method of achieving their ends. Project-based work means that for significant periods

a large proportion of businesses ' incomes are dependent on non-disruption of a small number of other businesses.

53 When profitability is put at risk, businesses act in their own self interest. Often this can extend

to acting unlawful ly. Disregard for the law is further reinforced by unions using whatever tools

are available to maintain their position of power and to expand their membership. Th e most

successful tool is commercial pressure.

54 The resu lt is an industry under siege. There is considerable tension between the parties. They

do not co-operate or develop united strategies to promote the future of the industry.

55 Unions use the obl igation to protect and pu rsue the interests of their members to justify the

appropriation to themselves of many aspects of business decision making. Th is strategy reinforces the power of the union and promotes its own organisational goals.

Problems in the industry

56 The culture of the bu ildin g and construction industry has affected its efficiency, fairn ess and the capacity to innovate. Obviously, the breakdown in rights and lawlessness are problems in

themselves. Other aspects of the culture have resu lted in many inflexible practices an d

impediments to productivity, inappropriate behaviour, particularly by union officials, a lack of

leadership among building and construction businesses and a range of national issues that

have been identified by the Commission.

Inflexible practices

Awards and agreements

57 Many of the constraints on productivity result from rigidities entrenched in the National Building

and Construction Industry Award 2000 or the inflexibility in pattern bargaining and associated

demands by the unions. 29

58 Even in an era of award simplification and the circumscription of allowable award matters30 th is

Award is highly prescriptive. It is the repository of at least 21 allowances and 41 special rates

that are in the nature of allowances.3 1 It also imposes severe limitations on the scheduling of

rostered days off (RDOs) , crib time, overtime, special time, shift rates and weekend work.

59 The various inflexible practices and impediments to produ ctivity are discussed in detail in

volume 8, Reform- National Issues Part 2, of this report. Most sign ifi cantly, they arise from the:

•

•

•

•

•

current plethora of all owances and special rates;

rigid ities in relation to hours of work;

high incidence of industrial stoppages;

lack of flexibility in industrial ag reements; and

constraints on employment arrangements .

21 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

60 All these examples prevent employers and employees from negotiating working arrangements

that suit their circumstances. In effect there are key aspects of bu ilding and construction

businesses where productivity improvements are impossible because the status quo is locked in.

61 Despite the rigidities in the Award the large number of certified agreements in the building and

construction industry should provide an avenue for more flexible arrangements to be

negotiated by individual businesses. Over the past two years more bu ilding and construction

industry agreements have been certified under Part VIB of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) than in any other industry32 Thi s flexibility has not fully eventuated. Many of these

agreements still include complex sets of allowances and special rates.

62 The sheer number and complexity of these allowances makes it obvious that it is

administratively costly for businesses to calculate their workers' rightful remuneration . This

increases the risk of error, particularly among small businesses. It is difficult for employees to be

aware of all of their entitlements, making it easier for unscrupulous employers to get away with

underpaying their workers.

63 Certified agreements have not been used as a vehicle to improve productivity. They frequently

refer to 'efficiencies and productivity offsets' as being the justification for improved wages and

conditions 33 Rarely do they specify what those 'efficiencies or productivity offsets' are. Even

less frequently are stated empirical measurement or performance indicators by which such

efficiencies or productivity offsets could be measured. In one example the improved payment

was dependent on achieving milestones or key performance indicators . The payments were

made even though the performance milestones were not met. 34

64 Wh ile the Award provides for some limited flexibility in start and finish times and the timing of

RDOs, industrial practices do not allow this flexi bility to operate. Excessive hours should be

avoided as they place an unreasonable burden on employees, affect health and increase the

risk of accidents at work. Within these constraints, however, there should be flexibility to meet

the demands of projects and the preferences of employees. In many cases this flexibility is not

being achieved.

65 Mr Daniel Grollo, Managing Director of Grocon Pty Ltd (Grocon), raised the issue of the

flexibility of start and finish times on Saturdays on the Queen Victoria site in Melbourne.

Workers arrive on site for work to start at 7 am. The Melbourne City Council does not permit

work to commence until 8 am. Workers are paid for the additional hour without having to

work35 Grocon has been unable to reach agreement with its employees and the CFMEU for

the working day to start at 8 am.

66 Similarly there is often very little flexibility regard ing when RDOs can be taken. I heard evidence

of some flexibility. I also heard evidence of unions refusing to allow substitution. I received

submissions in which it was contended there were circumstances where workers would agree

to rea llocate RDOs, but would be blocked by a union. 36 In New South Wales the flexibility to

bank and alter RDOs was more common than in Western Australia and Victoria.

67 As the timing of days off is not driven by the needs of the project, but is fixed by a calendar

agreed by the unions and head contractors during the preceding year, there is a risk that even

longer hours wil l be necessary if project stages need to be met with in a restricted timeframe.

Na tional Perspective Part 1 2 '1 5

68 Overall , there are considerably more days off in the building and construction industry than in

most other industrie s. In Victoria in 2003 under the Victorian Building Industry Agreement,

RDOs, fixed and general annual leave, public holidays and picnic days mean that workers have

57 days or over 11 weeks leave. Yet in many cases employees work a six day week, the sixth

day of which is paid at overt ime rates, to compensate in part for thi s excessive leave .

69 In conjunction with a large number of scheduled days off employees work large amounts of

overtime. In May 2000 about 43 per cent of building and construction industry employees were

paid overtime. This was the highest of all industries and nearly twice the national average of

23 per cent. A relatively hig h proportion of income is earned through overtime. Thirteen per

cent for the building and construction industry was again the highest for all industries and over

twice the national average 3 7

70 This is confirmed by anecdotal evidence. In Victoria the standard number of hours is 56 per

week comprising a cycle of four ten hour days followed by two eight hour days. On large scale

projects workers are usuall y engaged for somewhere between 50 and 58 hours each week

with working days ranging from eight to twelve hours per day38 Th is equates to between

1 0 and 18 hours overtime.

71 Campaigns to reduce the number of standard hours do not lead to a reduction in the number

of hours worked each week. For example, the introduction of the '36 hour week' in Victoria:

(a) has not res ulted in the weeks actually worked being shorter. It was never intended to do

so;

(b) has resulted in increased overtime payable during the weeks actually worked; and

(c) has resulted in an increased nu mber of days not worked.

Th ere are obvious ways in which the working week could be rationalised to the advantage of

both employers and employees, but such methods have not been discussed because of the

en trenched rigidities and culture.

Stoppages

72 Work stoppages are common in the building and construction industry. I am not concerned

about lawful stoppages . Unlawful stoppages, however, are often used as an in dustrial tool to

persuade businesses to comply with union demands. I have identifi ed problems with :

• inflexibility in the inclement weather provisions;

• abuse of OH&S procedures to achieve other industrial goals; and

• excessive industrial disputes.

73 The Award provides for work to stop if abnormal cli mate conditions such as rai n, hail , sn ow,

cold, high wind, severe dust storms or high temperature make it unreasonable or unsafe for

employees to continue to work. Em ployees are paid for time off due to inclement weather.

7 4 I have received evidence of inclement weather claims being used for industrial purposes. For

example, in 1997 a roving shop steward for the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy

Uni on employed by Wycombes Pty Ltd , threatened to close down the Bun nings site at Cori o

21 6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

because of in clement weather. It was not raining. However, the shop steward held out a

cigarette, spat on it and told a concrete contractor who did not have a union-endorsed EBA

that the spittle on the cigarette was sufficient to justify closing the site down on the grounds of

inclement weather .. He ordered the contractor's employees to go to the site sheds. The

contractor then signed a union- endorsed EBA. 39

75 In several cases union organisers and site delegates acted as arbiters of what amounted to

inclement weather and acted upon their own assessment. They arrived on a site and ordered

workers to the shed or to go home. In some cases meetings were conducted and workers

voted to sit in the sheds or return home.

76 Definitions of inclement weather were often interpreted contrary to the definitions in

agreements or award, and contrary to common sense. What was considered inclement

weather often depended on the part icular union organ isers, and in some cases whether they

were pursuing an industrial agenda against a head contractor or subcontractor on a project 40

77 Flexibility has been included in in clement weather provisions in awards to enable work to

continue in areas unaffected by inclement weather but union organisers do not allow that

flexibility. While the incidence of this practice appears to be far less prevalent than in the 1980s, 41 I heard eviden ce of electricians be ing ordered to cease work when the outside

temperature was in excess of 35°C whi le the area in which they were working was below 30°C.

In Victoria, this practice is entrenched by clause 26 of the VBIA, which provides that all work on

a site will cease wh en the local temperature reaches 35°C whether or not workers are exposed

to the temperature unless they are working in an air-conditioned space 42

78 There was extensive evidence of stoppages for claimed occupational health and safety

reasons.

79 I recognise the importance of occupational health and safety in an indu stry characterised by

dangerous work. Workers in the building and construction industry are, on average, twice as

likely to be kil led at work and 50 per cent more likely to be injured at work than workers in other

Australian industries43 It is totally unacceptable that any bui lding and construction worker

should be seriously injured or ki lled while at work.

80 However, many stoppages were not necessary. They were often instigated by union officials

who were ill placed to judge the need for a stoppage. Frequently, safety committees and safety

officers were not involved in decisions to close sites or portions of sites.

81 The approach of union organisers to safety issues was frequently idiosyncratic . There was

much evidence su pporting the view that the frequency and rigour of a safety inspection

depended upon collateral industrial matters being negotiated with a head contractor or other

subcontractors on a site. In these cases, frivolous safety matters were raised in order to cause

delay. Stop work meetings were called , wh ich inevitably stopped productive work even if

workers ultimately elected to continue work.

82 Stoppages on one site were sometimes linked to safety issues on a different site. The most

prominent example is the Victorian practice of an industrywide 24 hour stoppage in the

commercial sector following a death on a building site in Victoria 44 These statewide stoppages

National Perspective Part 1 2 1 7

inflict economic damage on the majority of contractors who have been complyi ng wi th

occupational health and safety obligations and have nothing to do with the incident at hand 45

83 ThBre was evidence that occupational health and safety is used to circumvent s187 AA of the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth). That provision prohibits an employer from paying an

employee for a period during which the employee was engaged in industrial action. In contrast,

stoppages for occupational health and safety are paid stoppages 4 6 When parties are in

dispute over industrial matters, stoppages are frequently called for minor safety issues to justify

payment for lost time 47 It was rare to hear evidence of an in dustrial dispute in which safety

issues were not raised, even though it was obvious the true issue was an industrial one. The

Nambour Hospital dispute is a clear example.48

84 Over the last six years the level of industrial disputation in the building and construction industry

has been at least twice and sometimes nearly five times the national average. 49 More detail is

provided in attachment 6. Because of the complexity of the causes and impact of industrial

disputes it is difficult to measure their impact on productivity across the industry. Even in an

industry with as much time lost as building and construction, thi s is on ly a small part of the total

hours worked. However, lost tim e does have a significant impact on continuity of work and thus productivity on the affected project. so

85 As a result , the indirect effects are likely to be the most significant. The potential for industrial

action adds an additi onal commercial risk to an already risky in dustry. It exacerbates existing

problems such as the volatility in businesses' cas h flows . This risk is bu ilt into the cost of

bui lding and construction projects. 5 1

86 It can affect the reputati on of a particular State or of Australia as a whole as a good place to

invest.

87 It was found that in Victoria unl awfu l industrial action had forced a contractor to cease doing business in Victoria or to determine not to enter the Victorian market. Another business is

reviewin g its investment decision. 52 Both business income and employment opportunities are

thereby lost to the State. 53

Employment arrang ements

88 There was much evidence before the Commission that the unions direct businesses as to

whom they can employ and how they can engage their workforce. In particular they discourage

the employment of:

• non-union membe rs;

• contractors;

• casual workers; and

• workers engaged through labour hire companies except those companies approved by the union.

89 They encourage the employment of union-endorsed workers , particularly in the key positions of

site delegate and OH&S officer. In some cases unions have used threats or industrial action to achieve their preferred employment arrangements.

21 8 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

90 Many groups are concerned about union control over employment arrangements. The

evidence before me indicated that many of these concerns are justified.

91 In New South Wales, for example, a union through an organiser sought to act as the controller

of who should or should not be in the industry54 Similarly, problems were found in Victoria, 55

whi le in Western Australia the union required businesses to engage unnecessary labour56

92 Such restrictions impede productivity as the unions, rather than management. are responsible

for making management decisions. The requirement for businesses to employ and pay

individuals who ostensibly work for the union and undertake very little, if any, construction work

is of particular concern. Businesses are unable to choose the employees and employment

arrangements that best suit their circumstances. 57

93 The evidence I heard included the following examples.

• Unions require particular individuals to be employed in key positions - for example the

induction officer, workplace delegate or occupational health and safety officer. These

employees are paid by the employer, often to undertake union business. Many of them do little, if any, building work. 58

• Unions have a list of unemployed workers. At the beginning of a new project builders are

obliged or coerced to engage employees from the list. Employers who do not agree to use these workers may not be allowed to work on site. 59

• Uni ons have preferred labour hire companies and businesses are required to engage

people from th e preferred companies. If a business a non-preferred company then

the workers may not be allowed to work on site or the project may be subject to industrial action. 60

• Unions oppose the use of part time labour and encourage employers to engage people

as employees rather than subcontractors or as temporary labour hire.61 The unions also

have preferred subcontractors 62

Behaviour ot union officials

94 There are many examples of inappropriate behaviour by union officials . Such behaviour occurs

in many different forms of activity. There was no evidence of senior union officials in the CFMEU

seeking to control or stop such behaviour.

95 A few examples of such behaviour will suffice:

• Threatening book inspections if the subcontractor did not enter into an EBA with the

CFMEU:

Ken oss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (ACT) : Kenoss Contractors was subjected to a

campaign by organ isers of the CFMEU to have it enter into a union-endorsed EBA. In late

1999, Mr Peter Primmer, a CFMEU organiser, said to the General Manager of Kenoss

Contractors, 'I'll make sure you never get that job ... unless you sign an enterprise

agreement' , and then gave him a notice demanding an inspection of time and wages

records. Between 22 October 2001 and 26 November 2001 Kenoss Contractors

National Perspective Part 1 2 i 9

received twelve separate notifications from the CFMEU of its intention to have officials

attend on sites on which Kenoss was working to conduct inspections.

• Threatening book inspections unless a subcontractor enrolled its employees as uni on

members:

Fineline Painting Pty Ltd case study (NSW): In late I 998 Mr David Kelly, a CFMEU

organiser, visited the Milton Water Treatment Works Project on which Fineline was

engaged, and demanded to know why Fineline's employees were not members of the

CFMEU. When Mogg said he was not interested in joining his employees to the CFMEU ,

Kelly said that he was going to carry out a wage book inspection, find a breach and

cause problems for Fineline.

• Threatening OH&S inspections if the subcontractor did not agree to the union 's

demands:

Grindley Constructions Pty Ltd case study (NSW): On 6 October 2000 Brcic, a CFMEU

organiser, attended a Grindley Construction site while a dispute was current The site

diary notes record him as saying, ' .. . if the demands were not met, he would carry out a

safety in spection and would find faults that would close the site ... '.

• Repetitive entry to a site aimed at causing disruption on a project so as to force a

subcontractor to enter into an EBA with the union:

Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd case study (NSW): As part of a campaign to have Kenoss

Contractors sign a union-endorsed EBA, King, a CFM EU organiser, entered sites on which

the company was engaged more than 9 times between I 0 June 2000 and 12 July 2000.

On many of these occasions he spoke with the men and disrupted work on site.

• Requiring 'donations' to be paid to the CFMEU or bodies associated with the union:

Payments to the CFMEU case study (WA) : This case study details the practice in

Western Australia of the payment by most major contractors of amounts to the CFMEU in order that the uni on permit the presence of non-union labour on site . The claim for

payment is supported by the explicit or implicit threat that, without payment, industrial

action wi ll follow.

Right Group Pty Limited case study (NSW): Right Group made a $25 000 'donation' to

the Korean Federation of Construction Trade Unions. The payment was made after

Mr Andrew Ferguson had alleged that Right Group had been employing illegal immigrant labour and had been paying its employees cash in hand. Ferg uson drafted a note which

was signed by a director of Right Group, which asserted that the payment had been

made 'without duress' and in the hope that the money would be 'of value in assisting th e

KFCTU to improve wages and conditions of building workers in South Korea'.

• Union officials adopting the role of policeman of practices in the industry, and imposing or

threatening to impose fines:

Union matters case study (NSW) : The CFMEU suspected Royal Tiles Contractors Pty

Ltd, Deemah Marble & Granite Pty Ltd, Stonetech (Holdings) Pty Ltd and Saba Bros

Ti ling Pty Ltd of having evaded their obligations to pay certain entitlements to an illeg al

220 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

immigrant worker who had died in Sydney. The CFMEU organised for work bans to be

imposed on sites involving the four companies 'until all related matters have been

resolved '. The dispute was re solved with each of the companies making separate

'donations' of $25 000 to the deceased worker's widow.

• Union officials seeking to act as regulators of sectors in the industry:

Alkene Asbestos Removal case study (NSW): In June 2000 Mr Craig Bates , then the Assistant Secretary of the CFMEU in New South Wales, asked a contractor, Alkene

Asbestos Removal Pty Ltd, to pay $10 000 as a contribution to the wages of an

organiser, so that the organiser could police the asbestos industry. Bates said he was

going to ask other asbestos removal contractors for a similar contribution.

• Union officials ignoring legal requirements by using industrial pressure to force payments

to workers rather than a liquidator

Herscheii-Stent Pty Ltd case study (Victoria) : In May 1999 Herscheii-Stent went into

liquidation, owing its employees some moneys in respect of entitlements. As a result of a

demand by two CFM EU organise rs, Grocon Lim ited paid $30 000 in retention moneys it

held against Herscheii-Stent to the CFMEU, despite instructions from the company's

liquidator that moneys owed by Grocon to Herscheii-Stent were to be fully accounted for to the liquidator.

Lack of accountability

96 The behaviour discussed above illustrates a lack of accountability by unions and their officials .

Used appropriately the right of entry and book inspections have a legitimate role in protecting

workers. Used inappropriately, particularly when accompanied by abusive or aggressive

behaviour, such inspections create many problems for the industry.

97 It is not the function of unions to usurp the role of government to police and, where appropriate,

regulate sectors of the industry. Union officials have no mandate from the public to do so, and

no body of union members can confer such a mandate upon officials.

98 The behaviour of union official s reinforces a culture of conflict and prevents negotiation that

could lead to improvements in workplace practices. It is disruptive to individual businesses an d

often to a whole site . Such disruptions can delay projects or require longer working hours to

make up time . Yet neither officials nor their union are held accountable for their actions.

99 Such behaviour breaches the rights of individuals and of businesses .

Lack of leadership

1 00 With a few exceptions, such as when State-based taskforces were in operation in New South

Wales and Western Australia, nobody has been able to change the inappropriate behaviours in

the building and construction industry. There is a general acceptance of what is considered to

be 'commercial real ity'.

1 01 There are very few examples of large businesses, major clients, or even governments taking the initiatives necessary to address the problems in the industry. Periodicall y, a head contractor

will try to negotiate alternative arrangements with the unions . Usually this attempt fails when the

National Perspec tive Part 1 221

objectives of the head contractor are undermined by the union reaching an agreement with one

of the contractor's competitors .

102 Lar-ge private sector companies and their representative organisations believe it would be

commercial suicide for an individual company to attempt to change the culture and practice in

the building and construction industry. When Grocon recently sought to do so, Kingham on

behalf of the CFMEU, suggested the attempt cou ld cause the company great fin ancial loss to

the extent that its bankers might become involved . As a result, head contractors and

subcontractors concede to union demands, even when they are legally entitled to do

otherwise. 63

1 03 Wh ile the current attitude of head contractors may be understandable it wi ll need to change for

the cu lture and practices in the building and construction industry to improve. The Commission

can only make recommendations that will improve the tools available to businesses to protect their rights . Businesses will need to be proactive, professional and eth ical in their dealings with

all parties in the industry to generate lasting change. One might have expected that the ACA

and its members, professing to uphold the highest ethical standards might, at the least, have agreed as a group to require adherence to the law, and agreements entered into. However,

their individual self-interest seems to predominate.

104 Similarly, governments have oft en accepted 'commercial reality' instead of insisting on

adherence to the law or ethical business standards. They have made various attempts to

change the cu lture and practices in the industry but these efforts have not generated lasting

resu lts. There is potentially a conflict between the long term policy objectives of the government

to improve the culture and performance of the industry and the short term focus of the

government as a major client wishing to get its projects finished on time and on budget.

Different government departments are responsible for different roles . The problems the

Commonwealth has had in implementing the National Code of Practice for the industry

illustrates that differing practices in various departments, each acting in accordance with its

own priorities, can resu lt in inconsistent and divergent outcomes.

1 05 These conflicting objectives are further complicated by the political consequences of major

government projects being embroiled in costly industrial disputation and the close links

between political parties and the unions or major builders.

106 Currently, businesses that attempt to generate change do so on their own , in an environment

where others are willing to concede to union demands. Given the nature of competition

between building companies and the risk that confronting th e unions wi ll damage a head

contractor's reputation with clients, it is relatively easy for the unions to withstand and outlast

such efforts. As a result the current culture and practices have become deeply embedded in participants' attitudes.

National issues

107 The Commission identified many national issues creating problems in the building an d

construction industry. These are discussed in volumes 7 to 9 of this report . Some of these, for

example freedom of association, illegal migrant labour, inflexible practices, entry and

222 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

inspection, phoenix companies and unlawful and inappropriate payments are discussed

elsewhere in this volume. A few additional examples are provided in thi s section.

108 The security of payments is a major problem for subcontractors. As the bu ilding and

construction industry operates under an hierarchical chain of contracts, non-payment of one

subcontractor can affect payments to other subcontractors or suppliers down the contractual

chain. The financial failure of any one party in the contractual chain can cause a 'domino effect'

on other parties. Many of the smaller construction compan ies hold few assets - hen ce if the

firm becomes insolvent there are few assets to se ll to meet outstanding debts.

109 Cash fl ow is the lifeline of these smal l businesses. Default by a head contractor or a

subcontractor in making payments due has serious consequences on those awaiting payment fo r work done or goods supplied .

110 The natural risks in the industry are exacerbated by some principal contractors employing

tactics aimed at reducing, delay in g, or avoiding the payment of progress claims of

subcontractors, in order to boost the pri ncipal contractor's liquidity or profit margin.

11 1 The security of payment problem in the building and construction industry is exacerbated by

the absence of an effective adjudication and enforcement mechanism in relation to disputes

over progress payments, and the high cost and long delay in pursui ng payment claims through the court system.

112 A further problem in the industry is that managers are inappropriately devolving their

management respo nsibilities. The many significant risks and decisions on building and

construction projects need to be managed at the appropriate level in the hierarchy of project

management.

113 In many cases managers have surrende red management decisions to unions. Unions control

who can be employed by requi ring employees to be union members and specific individuals to

take key roles on many building sites. They control th e term s and conditions of employment

through pattern bargaining. Unions restrict which businesses co ntractors can deal with by

requiri ng all subcontractors to have union- endorsed EBAs, use preferred labour hire

companies or engage specific crane hire companies.

114 Yet another problem is that commercial risks are being inappropriately passed on to

subcontractors who are ill equipped, and can ill afford, to manage the responsibility. 64

115 If risks are inappropriately passed from head contractors to subcontractors or unions, or from

sen ior management to inadequately supported middle man agement in the head contracting

business then the fo llowing may occur:

• Management may be restricted in pursuing productivity improvements.

• In effect the workplace may be regulated by an industrial organisation without

accountability to the general community, and with a narrow sectional interest.

• Head contractors may be locked into a relationship with unions that reinforces union

power.

National Perspective Part 1 223

• Subcontractors may suffer financial losses because they are responsib le for risks that are

better dealt with at the head contractor leve l.

• Time delays and poor safety may occur because people who are ill -equipped to deal with

issues are forced to manage them.

• The senior management of the head contractor may distance itself from the management

of the project and not take responsib ility for wh at occurs on site. Thi s can include site safety and the making of in appropriate and unlawful payments, such as strike pay.

116 Inadequate focus on and investment in training are leading to sk il ls shortages in the industry.

Without access to trai ning, a hig hly skilled, flexible workforce cannot be maintained.

117 Lack of trai ning raises other concerns in relation to occupational health and safety. Inadequate

trai ning, especially in relation to new technologies and machinery, increases the risk of injuries

and accidents on site.

Scope to improve performance

118 Th ere is significant scope to improve the performance of the building and construction industry.

Identification of the problems makes clear the potential for improvement if these problems can be solved .

11 9 The Commission looked at many projects. The worst cases clearly illustrate the high cost of

failing to achieve appropriate workplace practices and conduct. 65 Materially identical projects

in New South Wales and Victoria took different periods to construct, and had materially

different costs principal ly be cause of poor work practices in Victoria.

120 In recent years the level of productivity growth in build ing and constru ction has fall en behind

other sectors of the economy. Since 1981 the rate of growth in various measures of

productivity has been less than the market average 66 This is due, in major part, to the

entrenched culture and work practices in the industry.

12 1 It has been argued in some submissions that the Australian bu il ding and construction industry

is performi ng well internationally an d, therefore, there is little justification for major industry

reforms.67 It is true that a number of international studies have concluded that the Australian

building and construction industry is among the better performers internationally (see annexure

4, volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report). But using this as an excuse not to act

is shortsighted. The studies do not show that the industry is operating efficiently. Indeed, the

fact that on vario us productivity measures , the industry has fallen behind the market average in Australi an industry indicates that signi fi cant ineffi ciencies remai n.

122 All international comparisons should be treated with caution because of the difficulty in

obtaini ng data that is comparable between countries. The international studies look on ly at

labour productivity because the difficulties in obtaining data limit the validity of broader

measures for comparing productivity. Partial productivity comparisons can be misleading. If

labour is relatively expensive in one country, construction firms in that country will tend to use

more capital to reduce the need to use expensive labour. The impact of this on labour productivity comparisons wi ll be that the country with the expensive labour will appear to be

224 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

highly productive. In the results presented it is difficult to identify the reasons underlying

Australia's ranking relative to other countries.

123 Continued improvements in performance in the Australian building and construction industry

are important for two reasons :

• the increasing gl obal competition in construction services; and

• the aggressive attempts of other countries to make their own building and construction industries more internationally competitive.

124 Annexure 4, volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report discusses two examples, the

United Kingdom and Singapore, where governments are pursuing major reform programs to

improve the performance of the building and construction industry in their countries.

125 International competitiveness attracts international investment. Reform is especially important

for Australia given its location in one of the world's most dynamic economic regions. This poses

special competitive challenges, risks and opportunities for both Australia generally and the

building and construction industry specifically.

Reasons for continuing problems in the building and construction industry

126 There are many problems in the building and construction industry. Some of the gains to the

economy and other industries from improving the performance of building and construction are

illustrated in modelling in annexure I , volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report . For

example there are significant benefits to the whole economy, the bui lding and construction industry and workers within the industry from pay in.creases that are accompanied by

productivity gains.

127 The problems in this industry are entrenched. Similar problems have been identified for many

years and while some have improved others have not. The industry is still characterised by

conflict, self interest and lawlessness. This section discusses why these problems are

contin uing despite various government initiatives to address them 68

Industry history and practice

128 The problems in the bu ilding and construction industry are not new. A History of Recent

Industrial Relations Events in the Australian Building and Construction ln dustry69 briefly notes

the industrial relations history between 1970 and 1990. Over that period the main industry

union was the Builders Labourers ' Federation (B LF). There were significant periods of chronic

industrial disputation, convictions for corruption and the eventual deregistration of the BLF.

Mr Brian Boyd, then an organiser with the BLF, later detailed in his book, Inside the BLF: A

Union Self-destructs, the use of builders labourers' indu strial power to seek to avoid the

General Secretary's corruption charges and the ensuing criminal trials:

The first phase of the industrial campaign to stop the consequences of the Royal

Commission bribes allegations going to court occurred from the latter part of 1980 to

December 1984. The second phase was during the actual County Court trial, February to

June 1985, when various activities were deliberately encouraged by Gallagher in an

attempt to have the trial aborted. The general idea at this point was to create an adverse

National Perspective Part 1 225

atmosphere and generate a level of media coverage that would have the prospect of 'a

fair trial' declared to have been prejudiced.

Now the objective of the third phase is to 'convince' the powers that be it is not worth

their while to re-prosecute Gallagher. 70

129 In 1 992 the Gyles Royal Commission described the environment in New South Wales as

'nothing less than industrial anarchy in which any pretence of the rule of law or the application of principle has been abandoned'?1

130 In Victoria in 1 994:

The [Economic Development] Committee [found} that an atmosphere of uncertainty and

fear of retribution operates within the Victorian build1ng and construction industry,

crea ting a culture that accepts inefficient and corrupt practices as the norm. 72

131 This cu lture has been strong enough to survive several attempts at reform . The most effective

attempts were the State Government taskforces but when these initiatives were withdrawn the

industry soon returned to its old practices. I heard evidence that illustrated that unions took the

absence of the taskforce as an indication that they could take more extreme action . For

instance, the Site Manager of Doric Construction Pty Ltd told the Commission in Perth that

when a union representative was seeki ng to hold a site meeting without providing 24 hours

notice the union rep resentative said 'the taskforce are gone and I am coming on site for a

coffee' . 73

132 Pattern bargaining has further entrenched the existing culture and practices by:

(a) encouraging an average outcome across the industry that does not provide for

innovation and change;

(b) developing agreements that have been negotiated by a small group of establish ed

industry players who accept the cu rrent cu ltu re as inevitable;

(c) encouraging and requiring the adoption of ag reements reinforcing a mandated uniform

approach;

(d) maintaining the control and domination by unions because of their ability to control the

bargaini ng process;

(e) imposing barriers on movement between sectors in the industry; and

(fj preventing employees and employers negotiating with each other.

133 A glass ceiling exists below the top level of commercial work in the industry, which severely

restricts the entry of potential partici pants who might otherwise compete for work in this sector

of the industry, particularly at subcontractor level. 74 Once a subcontractor signs the union­

endorsed EBA its terms and conditions apply to its whole business. The higher cost structure that results means that the subcontractor cannot compete on smaller projects against non ­

EBA subcontractors. 75 Conversely, subcontractors without a union -endorsed EBA and thus

with a lesser cost structure, are not permitted to compete for the more major works.

134 Transfield argued that pattern bargaining results in :

226 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

forcing smaller and specialist subcontractors to execute Pattern Agreements, so that

such subcontractors experience dramatic increases in all areas in which they operate.

This often results in subcontractors declining to bid for work on large projects where a

Pattern is a necessary condition to access and work on the site. This has the effect of lessening competition in the industry. 76

135 Similarly, in Tasmania the Building Industry Specialist Contractors Organisation (BISCO

Tasmania) stated that:

By far the most damaging result of any agreement made between head contractors and

unions is there [sic} ability to overturn subcontractors Enterprise Agreements that have

been previously negotiated and ratified by the Industrial Court. 77

136 The culture and practices described in the previous sections have become the industry norms.

There is little momentum for change because:

• parties accept and expect the current standard of behaviour; and

• incumbents are more comfortable dealing with the environment they know, than facing

the risk of change.

The economic structure of the industry

137 Given the economic structure of the industry it is not possible to rely on market pressure to

rectify the deficiencies in industry culture and practice.

138 In most industries, there is a range of competitive pre$SUres that ensure that the industry

operates efficiently - minimising costs (subject to the quality of the product or service

produced) and providing remuneration to business owners and employees that reflects the

value of their work compared with the value of similar work in other industries.

139 In the building and construction industry several of these competitive pressures are weak or

non-existent.

140 In most industries such competitive pressures come from one or more of the following sources:

• imports;

• export markets;

• similar products produced in Australia;

• other producers in the industry;

• competition within the labour force; and

• investment capital markets.

141 International competition from im ports and exports results in pressures on domestic producers

to improve their productivity. Imports achieve this by bringing products into Australia that

compete directly with Australian produced products. Businesses that rel y heavily on exports

need to keep their costs internationally competitive , otherwise they wil l lose their overseas

customers.

National Perspective Part 1 227

142 Another aven ue that puts pressure on firms to work hard to improve all levels of their business

is competition from competing projects. Many services, for instance cinema entertainment, are

not imported or exported. However, there are many other products and services, such as

videos, television and alternative forms of entertainment that ensure that the owners and

managers of cinemas operate their businesses as efficiently as possible.

143 Within an industry itself, competition among producers will ensure that they improve

productivity in those areas under their control. Often thi s wi ll inc lu de both management and

labour costs. For competition between businesses to improve labour productivity business

owners must be able to influence the terms and conditions under wh ich they employ people. In

practice, in most industries this is possible subject to a minimum set of employment conditions.

Even when only one union covers an industry labour arrangements can be relatively flexible

because there is a choice between union and non -u nion employees and contract workers.

144 Overall, these factors work together to put pressure on businesses to ensure that they have

high levels of productivity. Otherwise, they wil l become uncompetitive and lose business. These

factors also work to ensure that labour and other supp liers improve their productivity. If the

productivity of employees is low, employers will either choose to use other sou rces of labour or

they wi ll go out of business, result in g in people losing their jobs.

145 In the building and construction industry there is no international competition. While it is

possible for an overseas company to come to Australia to tender for a project, the on ly import

is project man agement. Because it is not possible to import the fin ished road or bui lding the ful l

price is not subject to import competition . Si mi larly, Australian firms can sell their services

overseas, but again they are only exporting the project management component of the building

or constructi on project.

146 In additio n, there are few products produced in Australia that provide an alternative to a

build ing or piece of infrastructure. There is virtually no competition from alternative products

and services .

14 7 There is competition among producers in the building and construction industry and this is

likely to be reflected in some parts in the industry operating very efficiently. However, as discussed in the following section, the type of competition is not uniform. In addition, the

incidence of pattern agreements in non -residential building, particularly in the capital cities, and

the difficulties facing companies looking to employ people under alternative terms and

conditions, means that the competition among producers in this sector tends not to influence

the terms and conditions of employment.

148 Whi le there is some indirect competitive pressure exerted through the capital markef8 its

effectiveness in the building and construction industry is muted. The public sector accounts for

nearly 40 per cent of the building and construction activity within the Commission's terms of

reference and the public sector is not subject to the same funding constraints as private

investors. The capital market responds to project returns and, as discussed later, often higher

build ing costs can be passed on to the end user of the building. Therefore, higher costs do not

necessarily affect the return on project capital.

149 Overall, because of the lack of competitive pressure from external forces such as exports,

imports or alternative Australian produced products there is little pressure on individual

228 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

employers to attempt to break ranks and run the risks of trying to change labour arrangements

to improve productivity. The incentive is for each business to try and improve productivity in

those areas where it has control and accept as given any labour or other costs when it knows

that its competitor? will also face such costs.

150 The Gyles Royal Commission noted that there are few incentives for businesses to focus on improving the productivity of labour.

Another feature of the industry is the relative lack of import competition. Buildings

themselves, in the main, will not be imported. Transport makes it difficult to import many

building materials. The nature of our immigration system and industrial relations systems rules out importing labour from overseas for individual projects. It is difficult enough to

bring labour in from other States of Australia. It would be a brave overseas contractor

who confronted industrial relations in the commercial sector in competition with local

builders. This, coupled with the monopoly of labour in the commercial sector by the

unions and the high concentration of ownership in building materials and certain

specialised contractor sectors, indicates that most clients are at the mercy of the system.

Neither head contractors nor consultants have any particular reason to resist cost

increases . Ultimately they are all rewarded by adding a fee or a margin to cost or charging a fee which is based on cost. 79

Barriers to establishing a building and construction business

151 The previous section discussed the factors that red uce overall competitive pressure s on the

building and construction industry. The type of within the industry is affected by

how freely businesses can move into the industry or between sectors within the industry.

152 Most of the building and construction industry is highly competitive. It is characterised by a

large number of small specialised subcontractors. These businesses own very little plant and

equipment and they can readily move in and out of the industry. This competition makes it risky

for subcontractors to refuse to work under the terms and conditions set by head contractors.

Except during a building boom or for very specialised projects the head contractor will have a

choice of subcontractors.

153 The competitive environment for large head contractors is more complex. There are a number

of well established international businesses operating as head contractors in Australia. Many

have a proven track record and competition is strong. It is difficult for new head contractors to

establish themselves. In particular, new entrants need to get onto client tendering li sts. Pre­

qualification based on the expertise and the track record of head contractors, and sometimes

the major subcontractors, is now common for tendering on larger projects. Head contractors

must have demonstrated an ability to manage and co-ordinate projects. Because th ere are

only a few major contractors capable of undertaking major projects they tend to develop strong

links with major clients. These relationships make it difficult for other contractors to win

contracts away from the established businesses. As both relationship contracting (a lliances,

partnering , and negotiated tenders) and pre-qualification become more rigorous and

widespread in the industry, the difficulties for new firms seeking projects with the major clients

will increase.

National Perspective Part 1 229

154 The MBA Inc argued that the need to develop a relationship with the union further restricts the ability for new head contractors to become established.

The fact that only a limited number of contractors are capable of managing large projects

is pnmarily due to their commercial resilience which allowed them the necessary time to

develop working relationships with the unions ... This historical legacy in itself limits new

players from developing the capability to compete in the large project market. 80

155 The combination of competition within a group and the existence of a group that is difficult for

outsiders to break into generates an environment that perpetuates many of th e problems identified previously.

• The commercial pressure of competition encourages head contractors to adopt a commercially pragmatic approach to industrial relations.

• Clients have a choice of head contractors so that no individual business is willing to affect

its reputation by marring its industrial relations record.

• Head contractors are willing to overlook productivity issues when their competitors face

the same cost structures. There is little risk that an outside business with an innovative

approach could move in and undercut the incumbents.

156 In effect it reduces the incentives for the large businesses operating on major projects to

attempt to break ranks and run the risks of trying to change labour arrangements to improve productivity.

Failure of existing remedies

157 There are several existing mechanisms that should address the problems identified previously

in this volume. Despite the industry history and practice and the economic structure of the

industry, if these mechanisms worked effectively they should mitigate these problems. This is

not happening. For a range of reasons they have failed to deliver the desired outcomes (see attachment 7).

158 For instance, theoretically, the AIRC's role in mediating disputes should be able to address

many of the problems associated with a history of union militancy and unlawful strike action. In

practice, however, the responses of the AIRC are too slow to effectively deal with disputes and

the directions of the AIRC are often ignored.

159 The Code has not been as influential in changing the culture within the building and

construction industry as hoped. The Commonwealth Government made the following comments regarding the Code:

• support for the Code from the industry has been limited. There has been a negative

reception from unions;

• awareness of the Code amongst Commonwealth Departments and agencies

needs to be improve[d];

230 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• oversight and monitoring of the Code and its implementation are bureaucratic and

overly focussed on contractual issues rather than changing the behaviour of industry parties on site. 81

160 There are problems in implementing the Code because:

• industry guidelines have been developed for only two of the eight principles contained in the Code;

• the implementation guidelines are not sufficient to requ ire notification of breaches of the

Code;

• the Code Monitoring Group is ineffective;

• government departments have acted inconsistently with the Code because there are

inadequate measures to permit proper monitoring of the application of the Code;

• client departments are concentrating on contractual outcomes rather than

implementation of the objectives of the Code; and

• the Commonwealth has sought to pass compliance obligations contractually to head

contractors without supporting the contractors seeking to implement them .

161 The stated objective of the OEA is that when a breach of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) occurs , it will seek voluntary compliance from the offender before resorting to any other

dispute resolution mechanism. Whi le in some cases in the building and construction industry

this approach has been successful , in others the OEA has been unable to deal with problems

in this in dustry. Its performance appears to be inhibited by · many factors including :

• the CFMEU has an explicit policy of not co-operating w ith the OEA;

• the investigators have difficulty obtaining and collecting information in the building and

construction industry because the constraints on their powers do not take into account

the culture of lawlessness and intimidation that operates in this industry;

• the OEA policy of voluntary compliance means that much of its activity is confidential and

its activities are not sufficiently visible to act as a deterrent; and

• the OEA does not have the resources to develop the expertise and focus necessary to deal with the difficult environment in the building and construction industry.

162 Th e Commission received evidence throughout Australia that in the building and construction

industry parties that are subject to an order or direction from an industrial tribunal often breach

those orders or directions and usually with impunity.

163 The reasons for this are many and varied. Sometimes, another party that could seek redress for

non-compliance with an order or direction elects not to do so in the interests of resolving the

dispute and allowing the project to proceed. Sometimes such a party has no practicable option

but to allow the project to proceed because of an ongoing need to deal with the other party to

the dispute.

164 The Commission received consistent evidence that many participants regard the AIRC as an

uncertain and unsatisfactory forum for regulating industrial disputation because of:

National Perspective Part 1 231

• its primary function being to settle disputes by conciliation and compromise, rather than

enforcement of rights;

• the legal and commercial impediments to a party electing to pursue legal rights; and

• the absence of any material consequences when a claim is rejected.

165 The inability of the AIRC to enforce its orders compounds the problem. A number of examples

are provided in attachment 7 where the AIRC processes failed to resolve disputes. This

supports the conclusion that the AIRC processes are not working in the building and construction industry.

1 66 Employers have found the remedies avai lable at law to be cumbersome, slow and costly to

pursue, as well as diffic ult to achieve because they are governed by evidentiary requirements in

ci rcumstances where participants are often unwilling to give evidence voluntarily because of

fears of reprisals.

167 Because industrial action often takes the form of short stoppages, the timeframe fo r seeking

orders that industrial action stop or not occur under s127 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) and having them enforced by the Federal Court is too prolonged to enable this to be an

effecti ve remedy against industrial action. Unions well understand the practical delays any

employer faces in seeking to challenge their actions in tribunals or courts and know that by

adopting tactics such as short strikes they can damage the employer commercial ly without risking legal repercussions.

1 68 The costs to employers of enforcing their rights un der the Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C'wth) where unlawful industrial action was occurring are prohibitive. A simple proceeding

comprising an application to the AIRC under s166A coupled with an interlocutory application to

the Federal Court wou ld easi ly cost $30 000 to $60 000 in legal fees and management time.

These costs are disproportionate to the maximum fines provided for under the Workplace

Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) of $2000 for individuals and $10 000 for unions in respect of any

breach of a penalty provision in Part VIB of the Act. The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth) does not normally allow the recovery of costs nor does it allow for the awarding of damages.

Hence, the consequences faced by the unions from acting unlawfully are relatively minor in

comparison to the cost to businesses of seeking to take legal action to enforce their rights.

169 Con tractors and subcontractors are concerned furth er that if they take action in the Federal

Court they will be subject to reprisals by all unions. Th e basis for this concern is illu strated in the

attitude Mr Wi lliam Oliver, the th en Acting Victorian Building Uni ons Divisional Bran ch Secretary

for the CFMEU Construction and General Division , expressed during his dealings with Saizeriya

Australia Pty Ltd after it used th e secondary boycott provisions in the Trade Practices Act 1974

(C'wth) . This example is presented in detail in attachment 7.

232 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Notes to Industry Culture and Practice

ABS 2002 (8142.0.55.002 Summary of Industry Performance 2000-2001, May 2002).

ABS 1999 (Pri vate Sector Construction Industry, 1996-97: Australia, Cat. no. 8772.0).

Construction Industry Development Agency 1995, Measuring up or Muddling Through: Best Practice in the Australian Non-Residential Construction Industry, March, Sydney, document 072.0009.0780.0001 at 0015, based on IBM Consulting Group and the London Business School, Made in Europe: A Four Nations Best Practice Study.

Construction Industry Development Agency 1995, Measuring up or Muddling Through: Best Practice in the Australian Non-Residential Construction Industry, March, Sydney, document 072.0009.0780.0001 at 0016.

Construction Industry Development Agency 1 995, Measuring up or Muddling Through: Best Practice in the Australian Non-Residential Construction Industry, March, Sydney, document 072.0009.0780.0001 at 0016.

Volume 13, Hearings - New South Wales Part 1, case studies on Alkene Asbestos Removal Pty Ltd, and Betaform Constructions Pty Ltd.

Volume 15, Heanngs- Victoria Part 1, case studies on Anzac Day 1999, and Kessaris and Dawson; Volume 16, Hearings- Victoria Part 2, case study on Shaun Hughes.

Volume 18, Hearings- Queensland Part 2, case study on Townsville.

Volume 21, Hearings- Western Australia Part 2, case studies on The Accounts of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union of Workers, the Construction Skills Training Centre Inc and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, Western Australian Divisional Branch, and on 240 StGeorge's Terrace Perth.

10

Volume 19, Hearings- South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory and ACT, Northern Territory case study on Casuarina Shopping Centre. 11 Section 3.5 of this volume discussed the level of subcontracting in the building and construction industry.

12 ABS 2002 (Forms of Employment: Australia, Sept 2002, Cat. no. 63"59.0); ABS 2002 (6291.0.40.001 Labour Force (SE) Self Employed - Australia - Quarterly - Labour Force - Own Account Workers -Australia, Aug 2002, Cat. no. 6291.0).

13 Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd 2002, Letter to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry - Working arrangements, tax evasion, phoenix companies and underpayments of workers compensation , premiums and workers entitlements, 11 July, exhibit 1337, document 069.0521.0279.0031.

1 " Sutton, T14766/ 5-9.

15 National Intelligence and Analytical Service, Australian Securities Commission 1996, ASC Research Paper 95/01 , Project One: Phoenix Activities and Insolvent Trading , Public Version, Australian Securities Commission, Brisbane, pp. 12-13.

16 Volume 8, Reform- National Issues Part 2, Phoenix Companies. 17 The proportion was not identified by the review. 18 Again, the review did not identify the proportion. 19 Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs 1999, Review of Illegal Workers in Australia: Improving

Immigration Compliance1n the Workplace, Canberra, exhibit 1540, document 007.0030.0519.0001 at

0012.

2o Volume 19, Hearings- South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory and ACT, case study on Alice Springs

to Darwin Railway.

2 1 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (online), Welcome to CFMEU Construction Victorian

Branch [accessed 3 February 2003], http://www.cfmeu.com.au/construction/states/vic

22 For more information see volume 13, Hearings- New South Wales Part 1, case study on Alkene Asbestos

Removal Pty Ltd.

National Perspective Part 1 233

23

For more information see volume 20, Hearings- Western Australia Part 1, case study on Bluewater Apartments. 24 For more information see volume 19, Hearings- South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory and ACT,

Tasmanian case study on Kellaway Wall and Ceilings Pty Ltd.

25 For more information see volume 15, Hearings - Victoria Part 1, case study on Graham Andrews Builders Pty Ltd.

26 ABS 2002 (Australia Now, Construction, Industrial Disputes, Jan 2002). 27 ABS 2002 (Industrial disputes, Aug 2002: Australia, Cat. no. 6321.0). 28 See for example volume 19, Hearings - South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory and ACT, South

Australian case study on Chadwick Construction Technology Pty Ltd; volume 13, Hearings- New South Wales Part 1, case study on Rescrete Industri es Pty Ltd.

29

Pattern bargaining was discussed in section 4.6. The award and its coverage were discussed in section 4.5. 30 See Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), s89A. 31 These are set out in detail in volume 8, Reform- National Issues Part 2. 32

Departmen t of Employment and Workplace Relations 2002, Agreement Making in Australia, Workplace

Agreements Database. 33 Atkins, T3214/18-33. Typically, 1n relation to the prescription of wage increases an agreement certificate under s170LJ would read: 'In recognition of the efficiencies and productivity measures contained herein the

following increases shall be available to all employees covered by this agreement. .. ' 34 Volume 16, Hearings- Victoria Part 2, case study on The Federation Square Project.

35 Grollo, D. 2002, 'Back to the future: Grocon's New Direction', Speech to the Property Council of Australia, 12 November, Melbourne, exhibit 2008, document 095.0025.0988.0001 at 0004. 36 Master Builders Australia Incorporated 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and

Construction Industry in reference to discussion paper 3, 17 June, exhibit 771, documen t 067.0160.0974 0002 at 0012. 37 ABS 2001 (Employee earnings and hours, May 2000: Australia, Cat. no. 6306.0) . 38 Richardson T 4922/2-12; Trohear T5670/5-11; Williams T5429/21-27; James T2666/41-T2667 /3. 39 Carter Statement, exhibit 676, paragraph 31, document 066.0765.0087.0001; Carter, T2567/20-43. 4

° For example volume 20, Hearings- Western Australia Part 1, case study on Doric Group Holdings Pty Ltd; volume 15, Hearings -Victoria Part 1 , case study on City Link. 41 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects, Labour Market

Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, p. xxvii. 42 Victorian Building Industry Agreement 2000, exhibit 2A, document 007.0137.0535.0004 at 0032; T11967 /1 0-18. Meadows Statement, paragraphs 245-6, exhibit 1093, document 090.0148.0428.0001. 43

National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (onl ine), National On li ne Statistics Interactive (NOSI)-a Workers' Compensation Statistics Database [accessed 17 February 2003], http://nohsc.info.au.com 44 Ol1ver, T336/4-45.

45 Cross Statement, exhibit 5, paragraphs 98-99, document 010.0422.0350.0001. 46 Cross Statement, exhibit 5, paragraph 95, document 010.0422.0350.0001. 47 Volume 6, Reform- Occupational Health and Safety, Misuse of safety issues for industrial purposes. 48

Volume 18, Hearings- Queensland Part 2, case study on The Nambour Hospital Dispute.

49

ABS 2002 (Unpublished data, Construction, Industrial disputes, 2002; Industrial Disputes Australia, Aug 2002: Cat. no. 6321.0). 50 Productivity Commission 1999, Work Arrangements on Large Capital City Building Projects, Labour Market Research Report, Auslnfo, Canberra, page 34; Volume 13, Hearings- New South Wales, case study on Bitz

Excavations Pty Ltd, HMAS Albatross Project.

234 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

51

Australian Industry Group 2002, Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry­ Submission by the Australian Industry Group, 28 March , exhibit 441, document 016.0672.0673.0001_001 at 0007.

52 Volume 16, Saizeriya Case Study.

53

For more information see volume 15, Hearings- Victoria Part 1, case study on Monarch Group Pty Ltd. 54 For more information see volume 13, Hearings- New South Wales Part 1, case study on Ingleside Bricklaying . 55

See for example volume 15, Hearings - Victoria Part 1, case study on National Gallery of Victoria. 56 For more information see volume 20, Hearings -Western Australia Part 1 , case study on Floreat Forum. 57

Volume 13, Hearings- New South Wales Part 1, case study on Buildcorp (Australia) Pty Ltd. 58 For example, volume 13, Hearings - New Soutr, Wales Part 1, case study on Bovis Lend Lease Pty Ltd on Head Contractors' strategies; volume 16, Hearings- Victoria Part 2, case study on The Victorian State

Netball and Hockey Centre . 59 Volume 20, Hearings- Western Australia Part 1, Bui lding proJect at 166 Murray Street, Perth; Bukarica, T11200/28-35; T11967/ 21-30.

60

Volume 14, Hearings - New South Wales Part 2, case study on labour hire. 61 Volume 19, Hearings- South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory and ACT, case study on Timbercraft Pty Ltd .

62

Volu me 13, Hearings- New South Wales Part 1, case study on cranes. 63 For example volume 20, Hearings- Western Australia Part 1, case study on Payments to the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. 64

Grocon Pty Ltd 2002, Royal Commission 1nto the Building and Construction Industry Statement of Behalf of Grocon Pty Ltd, p. 26, exhibit 830, document 048.0949.0311.0094 at 0119-0120. 65 For example volume 16, Hearings- Victoria Part 2, case study on Woolworths OP1-0P2. 66

See annexure 1, volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report. 67 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union 2002, Further Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, exhibit 1807, document 029.0348

0978.0001 at 0003- 0005. 68 See annexure 2 on recent reviews, in volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report. 69 See annexure 5, volume 4, National Perspective Part 2, of this report.

70

Boyd, B. 1991, Inside the BLF· A Union Self-destructs, p. 234. 71 Gyles, R.V. OC 1992, Royal Commission into Productivity in the Building and Construction Industry in New South Wales: Final Report, Volume 7, Sydney, p. 18, exhibit 556, document 092.0709.0033.0002 at 0031. 72

Economic Development Committee 1994, Inquiry into the Victorian Building and Construction Industry, Third Report to Parliament: Productivity, April, Melbourne, p. 9.

73

Perrott Statutory Declaration, exhibit 935, paragraph 18, document 007.0686.0547.0001. 74 Overview of Private Meetings Held between the Honourable TRH Cole RFD QC and participants in the building and construction industry, exhibit 442, paragraphs 11-12, document 088.0525.0010.0001. 75

Master Builders Australia Inc 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in response to discussion paper 3, 17 June, exhibit 771 , document 067 .0160.097 4.0002 at 0006. 76 Transfield Pty Ltd 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry,

July, exhibit 820, paragraph 6. 1.8, document 057.0166.0542.0001 at 0014-0015. 77 Building Industry Specialist Contractors Organisation (BISCO Tasmania) 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in reference to discussion paper 3, 24 June, exhibit 773, document 017 0101.0834.0003 at 0005.

National Perspective Part 1 235

78

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in response to discussion paper 3, 3 July, exhibit 825, document 001.1819.1805.0003 at 0003: 'Projects developed in Australia therefore must be competitive in terms of cost and investment returns otherwise Australian and overseas investors will look elsewhere to place their money'.

79 Gyles, R.V. QC 1992, The Royal Commission into Productivity in the Building and Construction Industry in New South Wales: Final Report, Volume 7, Sydney, p. 5, exhibit 556, document 092.0709.0033.0002 at 0022.

80 Master Builders Australia Inc 2002, Submission to the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry in response to discussion paper 3, 17 June, exhibit 771, document 067.0160.0974.0002 at 0004.

81 Commonwealth Government 2002, Commonwealth Submission to the Royal Commission into the Buildmg and Construction Industry- Phase Two, 6 August, exhibit 494, document 100.0721.0253.0002 at 0067-0068.

236 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Attachment 1

Financial Analysis of Principal Employer and Employee Associations

National Perspective Part 1 237

238 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

1 Introduction

The fo llowing financial analysis provides indications of the financial strength of the various

employer and employee associations that play a ro le in the bui lding and construction industry.

2 The analysis does not provide consolidated accounts in accordance with relevant accounting

standards . Instead it uses figures drawn from financial returns provided to the State-based

industrial relations commissions and the Australian Industrial Registry of the Australian

Industrial Relations Commission, and as required by other bodies in accordance with State and

Commonwealth legislation.

3 The methodology adopted combines financial information for associations that in some cases

are separate for operational purposes, but can be viewed as one legally and in other cases

associations that are separate entities under law but are strongly affiliated. This methodology

has been adopted to reflect the cumulative financial strength of each association.

4 While the analysis focuses on information relating to the building and construction industry, it

includes every known branch, division and chapter for each employer and employee

associations. In some cases these separate units may not be related to the buil ding and

construction industry but have been included within the analysis as they are part of a principal

building and construction industry association . In other cases it is not possible to hig hlight

financial information relating to the building and construction industry for associations that deal

with many industries. In these cases the financial data provided reflect the information included

in the association 's consolidated accounts.

5 Where possible all income that has not been earned through membership subscriptions,

contributions or entrance fees has been identified separately and classified as non-core

income. In some cases a total income to total assets ratio, expressed as a percentage, has

been provided. Liabilities, being a total of non -current and cu rrent liabilities, have been outlined.

In some cases a total liabilities to net assets ratio in both per cent and times formats has been

provided. All liabilities have been included in these ratios.

6 Within the text values have been rounded to the nearest $1 00 000 excepting figures below

$1 mi llion which are as provided. In tabular form all figures are rounded to the nearest $1000.

Al l combined figu res and ratios have been calculated using actual values and not rounded

figures.

7 Combined figures for both liabilities and assets do not exclude loans between branches,

chapters or divisions of the same association unless otherwise noted. More broadly, the

National Perspective Part 1 239

Commission has not, for the purposes of this analysis, examined financial relationships with

controlled entities or other associated parties , excepting those trusts examined duri ng hearings .

8 It is important to note that different associations and even branches or divisions within

associations adopt different accounting methodologies and vary in adherence to accepted

accounting standards. In some instances this may have an impact on the actual financial

position of the association. For example , in many instances buildings an d land are valued at

cost as opposed to an appropriate market value.

9 The limitations of examining associations, particularly unions, which are replicated at State level

shou ld be acknowledged. There may be instances of overlap between associations that have

not been bought to the attention of the Commission. It cannot be discounted, excepting where

identical accounts are prepared at State and Federal level, that additional overlap, not cited in

the following analysis, exists.

1 0 Conversely, excepti ng those matters raised during the heari ngs in relation to trust funds, only

repo rted assets, liabil ities and in come provided in lodged accounts have been considered. The

extent to wh ich there are ad ditional bank accounts or assets held by associations which have

not been reported in lodged accounts or are held by related parties not required to lodge accounts within a particular jurisdiction has not been exam ined in this analysis.

2 40 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

2 Employee Associations

11 A number of unions have coverage of employees in the building and construction industry. The

major unions, as a consequence of their coverage of segments of the industry and trades within the industry, are :

• the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union also

referred to as the Australian Manufacturing Workers ' Union (AMWU).

• the Australian Workers ' Union (AWU);

• the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and

Allied Services Union commonly known as the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union (CEPU); and

• the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU);

The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union

12 The AMWU represents persons employed in the metals and engineering sectors of the industry

and tradespersons who undertake work of that nature. The AMWU is organised into a number

of divisions which reflect the nature of the work performed by members within those divisions.

13 The division of the AMWU with the most involvement in the building and construction industry

is the Metal and Engineering Division . That division does not lodge discrete accounts with the

Australian Industrial Registry of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission.

14 Each AMWU State council incorporates the relevant divisions within that geographic region .

Each State council receives remittances from the National Council to meet yearly expenditure.

In the financial year ending 30 September 2000 no State council retained an operating surplus

in excess of $100 000. 1 For this reason the AMWU National Council accounts are the most

relevant. An overview of the accounts of the National Council is presented in table 1 .

Total assets

15 The National Council accounts recorded total assets of $57.6 million for the year ending

30 September 2001 .2 A significant portion of the total assets was accounted for by land

and buildings held by the AMWU. The notes to, and forming part of the accounts,

recorded property at cost, and after depreciation , of $38.3 million for the year ending

30 September 2001 3

National Perspective Part 1 2 4 I

Liabilities

16 The National Council recorded total liabilities for the year end ing 30 September 2001 of

$20.3 million of which a significant portion was as a consequence of bank bills payable and

contri butions to hardship, political and other funds . 4

Net assets

17 For the year ending 30 September 2001 the National Council's net assets totalled

$37.3 million .5 The accounts show that over $5 million was transferred from the National

Council General Fund to the respective State councils during the period .6 The total debt to

equity ratio was 55 per ce nt or 1 .83 times .

Income

18 The National Council General Fund received income of $35.9 million for the year ending

30 September 2001 ? Th is income comprised approximately $30.2 million in membership

contributions and a further $5 .7 mi llion, or 19 per cent , from other sources. 8 The latter figure

mainly comprised income derived from rent ($4.8 mill ion) 9 The AMWU income to assets ratio

was 62 per cent.

Table 1 AMWU National Council General Fund ($'000), as at 30 September 2001 10

Total Assets Total Liabilities Net Assets Total Income

57 613 20330 37 283 35 903

The Australian Workers Union

19 The AWU represents employees working on a range of projects in the building and construction industry. The majority of AWU members, in the bui lding and construction industry,

are engaged on civil construction projects such as tu nnels, bridges and road making.

Federally registered association

20 The federally reg istered AWU consists of a number of branches and a national office. The

majority of these branches operate on a geographical basis. An additional number of branches

are specific to particular sectors within industry. There is no branch of the AWU which

exclusively represents people engaged in building and construction.

Total assets

21 The federally registered AWU recorded cumulative total assets of $27.9 million for the year

ending 30 June 2001. 11 The National Office recorded total assets of $9 .1 million for this

period.12 This was followed by the Greater New South Wales Branch with $5 .1 mi lli on for the

same period . 13

Liabilities

22 Cumulative total liabilities for the financial year ending 30 June 2001 for the federally registered

AWU eq ualled $15.6 million.14 The National Office's liabilities for the period of $8.5 million 15 was

2 42 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

far in excess of those of any geographically based bran ch . However, approximately $2.4 million in mostly non-current liabi lities is accounted for by loans from bran ches. 16

Net assets

23 For the year ending 30 June 2001 the cumulative net assets of the fe derally regi stered AWU

totalled $12.3 mi llion H The Queensland Branch and the Greater New South Wales Branch

recorded net assets of $3.8 million and $4.6 million respectively for the period . 18 The total debt to equity ratio for the federally registered union was 128 per cent or 0. 78 times.

Income

24 The combined income for the National Office and all the branches of th e federally registered

AWU was $29.2 mill ion, which included $2.4 mi llion in non-core income for the year ending

30 June 2001 w Of the income earned by the branches $2 .8 million was remitted to the

National Office 20 The income to assets ratio, excluding the National Offi ce subscription income of $2.8 million, was 95 per cent.

25

Table 2 Financial Position of AWU as at 30 June 2001 21

Total Assets Total Liabilities Net Assets Total Income

27 903 15 646 12 258 29 227

State unions

26 There are State unions registered under the name of the AWU. Mostly the State union and the

State branch of the federally registered union within a particular State are id entical. Queensland

was the only instance where financial · returns lodged with the State industrial relations

commissi on provide for separate accounts. This is detailed below.

27 In Queensland, membership subscriptions received by the State union, called the Australian

Workers' Union of Employees, Queensland (AWU Q), are forwarded in their enti rety to the State

branch of the federa lly reg istered AWU 22 In additi on the AWU 0 generates other income

not forwarded to the State branch of the federally registered AWU. 23 For the year ending

30 June 2001 over $1 million in non-core income was earned by the AWU Q 2 4

28 Additionally, the AWU Q held $1.4 million in net assets with total assets of $1 1.7 million for

the year ending 30 June 2001 .25 The AWU Q recorded total liabilities for the period of

$10.3 mill ion. 26

Combined assets, liabilities and income

29 The combined financial position for the AWU Q and the federally registered AWU is

summarised in tab le 3 below. Combined net assets exceeded $13.6 milli on with total income

of approximately $30.3 million . Table 3 is exclusive of significant loans between the AWU 0 and

the Queensland Branch of the AWU.

National Perspective Part 1 2 43

Table 3 Financial Position of Combined AWU as at 30 June 2001 27

Total Assets Total Liabilities Net Assets Total Income

34 718 21 101 13 617 30 358

Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union

30 The CEPU is made up of three broad divisions. The first is the Communications Division, wh ich

has no direct representation of employees in the building and construction industry. The

Plumbing Division an d Electrical Division represent em pl oyees performing speciali st trade work

in the building and construction industry.

Communications Division

31 The Communications Division has 14 divisions which report separately to the Australian

Industrial Registry. For the financial year ending 31 March 200 1 combined net assets for the

Communications Division equall ed $22 .9 milli on 28 The combined total assets for the

14 divisions , including the national offi ce, referred to as the Divisional Conference, is

$29.2 million with total liabilities of $6.4 million for the year ending 31 March 2001. 29

Electrical Division

32 The Electrical Division operates branches in each of the major Australian States. In New South

Wale s, Queensland and South Australi a, the traditional title of Electrical Trades Uni on or 'ETU '

has been retained for organisations operating under the relevant state industrial relation s

leg islation. With the exception of the El ectrical Trades Union of New South Wales (ETU NSW) ,

each State union appears to mirror the local branch of their federally registered counterpart.

Total assets

33 The El ectrical Division cumulative total assets for the year ending 31 December 2000 was

$35.7 mi llion 30

Liabilities

34 Th e El ectrical Division's combined total liabi lities for th e period ending 31 December 2000

amounted to $11.4 million 3 1 The ETU NSW had total liabi lities of $1.8 million for this period. 32

A break down of liabi lities by branch is provided at tab le 4.

Net assets

35 Cumulative net assets for the Electrical Division for the year ending 31 December 2000 totalled

$24. 3 million. 33 An overview of total assets and net assets for each branch of the Electrical

Division is provided at table 4.

36 The total debt to eq uity ratio for the CEPU Electrical Division was 4 7 per cent or 2.14 times.

Income

37 For the year ending 31 December 2000 income generated totalled $11 .9 million excluding the

$1 .4 million received in sustentation fees by th e National Offi ce of the Electrical Division 34 The

2 44 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construc tion Industry

ETU NSW recorded income of $3.9 million of which $860 102 was transferred to the New

South Wales Branch of the Electrical Divi sion 35 The in come to assets ratio, excluding the National office sustentation fees, was 33 per cent.

Table 4 Electrical Division Overview ($'000), as at 31 December 2000

National36 NSW37 Vic. 38 Qld39 SA4o WA41 Tas.42 Total43

Total Assets 2728 8777 13 799 5857 2252 1771 495 35 680

Total Liabilities 1683 4175 2292 1781 232 853 356 11 372

Net Assets 1045 4603 11 506 4076 2020 918 140 24 306

Core Income 1373 860 3590 2815 657 1164 287 10 746

Total Income 1647 1394 449 7 3353 785 1253 327 13 257

Funds and Trusts

38 The Electrical Division makes use of a number of discrete funds created for the benefit of their

members. These arrangements typically include a distress and mortality fund or simi lar. The

moneys included in these funds, as recorded in the respective financ ial statements, have been included in table 4, except for $1 .4 mi llion deposited in the Distress, Mortality and Train in g Fu nd

Trust controlled by the Victorian Electrical Division, which was not recorded in the appropriate

financial returns for the Victorian Electrical Division 44

State Unions

39 At State level a number of State reg istered unions mirror the CEPU Electrical Division or

incorporate a State branch of the federal union . In one instance there was a disparity between

the accounts of the State union and State branch of the CEPU Electrical Division.

40 The ETU NSW held total assets as at 31 December 2000 of $7.9 million and net assets of

$6.1 million 45 As noted earlier the ETU NSW recorded income of $3.9 million of which

$860 102 w as transferred to the New South Wales Branch of the Electrical Division 4 6

Plumbing Division

41 The Plum bing Division represents plumbi ng workers in the bui ldi ng and construction ind ustry.

The Plumbing Division operates a national office and branches in all States and the ACT.

42 Th e National Office of the Plumbing Division financial year ended 30 June 2001 and not

31 March 2001 as is the case with the seven jurisdictional branches 47 For this reason figures

provided for the Plumbing Divisi on as a whole are indicative only. The breakdown of assets,

liabilities and income for each rep orting entity is provided in table 5.

Totai assets

43 The Plumbing Division had total assets of $6. 3 million for the financial year end ing

31 March 2001 48 The bulk of this amount, $4 .2 million was held by the Victorian Branch 49

National Perspective Part 1 2 45

Liabilities

44 For the year ending 31 March 2001 the Plumbing Division recorded total liabilities of

$2. 1 million 5° The Queensland Branch recorded the most liab ilities at $4 19 051, 51 while the

Tasmanian Branch's liabi lities of $207 93452 exceed total assets by 24 times. The South

Australian, Western Australian and Tasmanian branches of the Plum bing Division liabilities

exceeded assets by $164 962, $192 929 and $207 934 respectively53

Net assets

45 The combined net assets of the Plumbing Division for the comparative period totalled

$4.2 mi llion 54 Th is was largely as a resu lt of the Victorian Branch. The Victorian Branch

financial accounts record net assets of $3.9 mill ion for the financial year ending

31 March 2001 55 In comparison, the National Office, New South Wales Division and

Queensland Division each recorded net assets of about $250 000. 56 The total debt to equity

ratio for the Plumbing Division, for the period, was 51 per cent or 1.97 times.

Income

46 The Plumbing Division, excluding the National Office, received $3.2 million in membership

contributions and entrance fees in the year ending 31 March 2001. 57 The National Office received contributions of $686 00058 Other income for the Plumbing Division totalled

$1.2 million with combined income being $4.4 million. 59

Table 5 Plumbing Division Financial Overview ($'000)

National60 NSW61 Vic.62 Qld63 SA64 WAss ACT66 Tas. 67 Tota l

Total Assets 626 532 4225 646 136 48 103 9 6325

Total Liabilities 362 263 294 419 301 240 36 217 2132

Net Assets 264 269 3931 226 (165) (193) 62 (208) 4186

Core Income 686 561 1728 522 129 162 74 20 3882

Non-core Income 16 162 845 51 112 11 12 0.5 1210

Combined assets and liabilities

4 7 A consol idated financial overview for the three Divisions of the CEPU is provided at table 6.

These figures are only indicative as a consequence of the disparate reporting periods. On the

basis of the combined figures net assets were $51.3 million, with total assets of $71.2 mi lli on

and total liabilities of $19.9 million.

2 46 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Table 6 CEPU Financial Overview ($'000)

Communicationsss Electrical6 9 Plumbing70 Combined

Total Assets 29 226 35 680 6325 71 231

Total Liabilities 6373 11 372 2132 19 877

Net Assets 22 853 24 306 4186 51 345

The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

48 The CFMEU represents workers engaged in a wide range of industries. The Construction and

General Divis ion of the uni on represents the largest cross-section of persons in the building and

construction industry. In addition to the Construction and General Division there exists a Mining

and Energy Division and a Forestry and Forest Products Division.

49 Two transitional divisions, th e Federated Furn ishing Trades Society Union Division and the

FEDFA and Fireman's Association (FEDFA) Division, have merged with the aforementioned

divisions to varying degrees over the past few years . The latter has direct involvement in the

building and construction industry.

50 Of particular interest is the financial strength of the Construction and General Division and to a

lesser extent the FEDFA Division. The Construction and General Division is examined below

with reference to the entire association. Combined figures, .which include all five divisions, 71 are

accurate to the extent that appropriate financial records are available for each division and its

branches during the year ending 31 December 2000. 72

51 The Construction and General Division has a National Office and State branches. The

exceptions are th e Northern Territory where no separate branch exists, an d Queensland where

the two branches work collaborative ly. A ninth branch, the Clay and Ceramics Industry

Divisi onal Branch, is also part of the Construction and General Division.

Assets

52 The Construction and General Divisi on had total assets for the year ending 31 December 2000

of $54.9 million .73 The New South Wales Branch held total assets for the period of

$22.3 mill ion 74 followed by the Victorian Branch with $10 million. 75 The Clay and Ceramics

Industry Divisional Branch had the least assets during the period, with a total of

$193 268 before liabilities. 76

Li abilities

53 The Construction and General Division had total liabilities of $10 million for the financial year

ending 31 December 2000 n The New South Wales Bran ch at $3 .1 million reported the most

liabilities. 78

National Perspective Part 1 2 4 7

Net assets

54 The federally registered Construction and General Division had combined net assets of

$44.8 million for the year ending 31 December 2000? 9 The FEDFA and Fireman's Association

Division, Victorian Divisional Branch held net assets of $1 .4 million during this period .so It

appears the FE DFA branches in al l other jurisdictions had by year ending

31 December 2000 merged, at least fin ancially, with the Construction and General Division or

similar.

55 Th e combined net assets of the federal ly registered CFMEU was $71 .I million fo r the year

ending 31 December 2000e1 This included the Mining and Energy Division with $20.4 million 82

and the Forestry and Forest Products Division with $4.4 million .S3 The total debt to equity ratio

for the Construction and General Division was 22 per cent or 4.45 times.

Income

56 Th e Construction and General Division recorded total income from membership subscriptions

for the year ending 31 December 2000 of $22 .1 mil li on .S4 Of this $389 262 was provided to the

CFMEU, National Office in capitation fees from the Construction and General Division National

Office.S5 The Construction and General Division National Office received around $2.5 million

from the State branches. 86

57 The New South Wales and Victorian Branches recorded the highest income from subscriptions

at $6.5 milli on 87 and $5.8 mi llion 88 respectively. The combined income from subscriptions for

the two Queensland Branches was sl ig htly less than $5.4 million.S9

58 The Construction and General Division 's combined non-core income for the year ending

31 December 2000 was $9.5 million 90 The New South Wales Branch earned $4.3 million91

and the Victorian Branch $3.1 million92 in non-core income. The Tasmanian Branch generated

the least non-core revenue at $68 551 93

59 Cumulative income for the Construction and General Division was $31.6 million for the year

ending 31 December 2000. The income to assets ratio for the Construction and General

Division was 57 per cent.

2 48 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Table 7 CFMEU, Construction and General Division Financial Overview ($'000)

Total Total Net Core Non-core

Assets Liabilities Assets Income Income

National94 8827 1197 7630 2450 445

NSW95 22 343 3056 19 288 6531 4306

Vic 96 10 007 1750 8257 5765 3117

Old L97 4222 734 3488 1984 222

Old W98 3729 1340 2390 3455 382

SAgg 542 113 430 724 129

WA 1oo 2263 1274 989 2466 373

ACT1 01 2405 182 2223 495 386

Tas. 102 374 251 123 249 69

Clay1 03 193 186 8 476 22

Total 54907 10082 44825 24 595 9451

State unions

60 At State level a number of State registered unions operate !hat mirror the CFMEU Construction and General Divi sion or incorporate a State branch of the federal union. In one instance there

exists a disparity between the accounts of the State union and State branch of the CFMEU,

Construction and General.

61 The Construction , Forestry, Mining and Energy Union of Workers 104 had net assets of $10.7 milli on and recorded income of $1 .3 mill ion for the year ending 31 December 2001 w 5

National Perspective Part 1 249

250 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

3 Employer Associations

62 A number of employer associations represent the interests of employers in the building and

construction industry. There are, in addition , a number of trade associations which also

represent employer interests nationally or on a State basis. For the purposes of this analysis the

Commission has only identified employer associations with national significance, either on the

basis of their combined sectoral representation or their operations across Australia. The

principal employer organisati ons are:

• Th e Australian Industry Group (AIG);

• The Civil Contractors Federation (CCF);

• Th e Master Builders Associations (MBA);

• The National Electrical and Communications Association (NECA); and

• Employer Plu mbin g and Allied Industry Associations.

Australian Industry Group

63 The AIG represents employer groups across a range of industries. Th is includes members in a

number of sectors in the building and construction industry throughout Australia.

64 Total assets for the AIG were $54.2 million , with total liabilities of $17.2 million for the fin ancial

year ending 30 June 2001.106 The AIG's consolidated and audited accounts record ed net

assets of $37 million for the year ending 30 June 2001.107 The total debt to equity ratio was 46

per cent or 2.16 times.

65 Total income was $32.7 million with membership contributions and fees accounting for

$14. 2 million 108 or 43 per cent. The in come to assets ratio for the period was 60 per cent.

Table 8 Australian Industry Group Overview ($'000), as at 30 June 2001 109

Total Assets Total Liabilities Net Assets Total Income

54 217 17 174 37 043 32 654

National Perspective Part 1 2 51

Civil Contractors Federation

66 In broad terms th e CCF represents contractors working on civil and eng ineering projects. The

CCF operates Branches in all States and Territories. The Northern Territory Branch is currently

inactive and the Tasman ian Branch has not provided financial retu rn s to the Australian Industria:

Registry for some years. Smaller Branches have been excluded from this analysis.

67 For the year ending 30 June 2001 the cumulative net assets of the CCF were approximately

$1 .1 million .110 The Victorian and Western Australian Bran ches had assets in excess of

$300 000,111 while the National Office's liabilities exceeded assets during this period.112

68 The CCF had total assets for th e year ending 30 June 2001 of $3 .1 million with total liabilities of

$2 million. 113 The total debt to equity ratio was 185 per cent or 0.54 times.

Table 9 Civil Contractors Federation Financial Overview ($'000}, as at 30 June 2001

National114 NSW11 5 Vic. 116 Qld 117 SA118 WA 119 ACT120 Total

Total Assets 274 540 1318 353 201 422 8 3108

Total Liabilities 276 372 923 143 196 107 n/a 2018

Net Assets (2) 168 395 209 5 315 8 1098

The Master Builders Associations

69 Master Builders Australia Incorporated is a national organisation with affili ates in every State.

The individual Master Builders Associations, referred to here collectively as the 'MBA',

represent employers in most areas of bui ldi ng and construction.

Total assets

70 For the year ending 30 June 2001 total assets for the MBA, excluding the Master Bu il ders

Australia Incorporated , exceeded $38.3 million. 121 Total assets for the Master Builders

Association of Victoria were $10.8 million, 122 with the Master Builders Association of Tasmania holding total assets of $2.7 million for the period. 123 The Master Bui lders Australia Incorporated

held assets of $1.7 million for the year endi ng 30 June 1999. 124

Liabilities

71 The Master Builders Australia Incorporated reported liabilities of $525 008 for the year ending

30 June 1999. 125 The MBA had total reported liabilities for the year ending 30 June 2001 of

$15.5 million .126

72 As at 30 June 2001 the Master Builders Association of Victoria had the greatest liabi lities at

$6 .2 million, 127 as compared with the Western Australian, ACT and Tasmania associations

whose liabilities at the time were all below $1 milli on .128

252 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Net assets

73 The cumulative net assets of the MBA for the corresponding period, once again excluding the

Master Bu ilders' Australia Incorporated, were $22.8 million. 129 This ranged from slightly more

than $500 000 "for Master Builders Association of New South Wales 130 to more than

$5.2 million for the Queensland Master Builders Association, Industrial Organisation of

Employers. 131 The total debt to equity ratio was 68 per cent or 1.47 times. Th e latest records

for the Master Builders Australia Incorporated indicated net assets of $1.16 million for the year ending 30 June 1 999 _132

In come

7 4 The total cumulative income arising from membership subscriptions for the year ending

30 June 2001 was $10.9 million.133 A further $27 million in other income was generated during

the same period. 134 This ranged from $11 .9 million for the Master Builders Association of

Victoria135 to sl ightly more than $800 000 for the Master Builders Association ofTasmania. 136

75 Total combined income for the associations, excluding Master Builders Australia Incorporated,

was $37.9 million. 137 Twenty-nine per cent of this income was derived from membership

subscriptions. The income to assets ratio for this period was 99 per cent.

Table 10 Financial Overview ($'000) of Master Builders Associations, as 30 June 2001

NSW1 38 Vic .1 39 Qld140 WA141 SA1 42 N 'cstle143 ACT144 Tas. 145 Total

Total Assets 4112 10816 6421 2802 5636 2855 2937 2704 38 283

Total Liabilities 3604 6231 1154 560 1146 1703 804 270 15 473

Net Assets 508 4585 5267 2241 4490 1152 2133 2434 22 810

Core Income 2460 2998 2927 620 1037 357 343 196 10 938

Non -core Income 2150 11 902 2188 2162 2565 4 11 6 1099 807 26 989

National Electrical and Communications Association

76 NECA is the nat ional representative of the electro-technical contracting industry. NECA

represents the interests of electrical and communications contractors, from employers and

business people to technicians in a range of industries including bu ild ing and construction.

77 NECA operates Chapters within each jurisdiction, with the exception of the Northern Territory.

Excluding Western Australia and Queensland , which have the relevant exemptions, each

Chapter reports to the Australian Industrial Registry. In Western Australia the Electrical

Contractors Association of Western Australia (ECA WA) , and in Queensland the NECA

Queensland, Industrial Organisation of Employers (NECA Queensland) both report to the

relevant State industrial registry. In New South Wales separate accounts are prepared for th e

State-registered Electrical Contractors Association (ECA NSW). The ECA NSW operates in

National Perspective Part 1 253

affiliation with the New South Wales Chapter. Each of these organisations, and the National

Office, has been included in the following analysis .

Total assets

78 NECA's combined total assets, including State associations and the EGA WA severance

scheme, were $22.3 million 146 for the year endin g 30 Ju ne 200 1.147 No separate trust existed

for the severance scheme 148 and as such it has been in cluded in the accou nts of the EGA WA

79 Total assets for the New South Wales Chapter, including the EGA NSW, were $6.8 million for

the same period .149 The EGA WA accounted for $5.3 million of the total figure of $22.3 million ,

which included $1.1 mi llion for the severance scheme. 15° Close to $20.2 million in total assets

was recorded in the balance sheets of the New South Wales Chapter, EGA WA. NECA

Queensland and Victorian Chapter. 151

Liabilities

80 NECA had com bined total liabilities for the corresponding period of $11.9 mi lli on. 152 A

sign ificant portion, nearly $10.9 mi llion, was attributed to the accounts of New South Wales

Chapter, EGA WA, NECA Queensland and Victorian Chapter in descending order. 153

Net assets

81 For the year ending 30 June 2001 consolidated net assets for NECA totalled $10.4 million. 154

The $10.4 million figure included $60 328 in net assets for the severance scheme managed

by the EGA WA 155 The total and net assets for each individual chapter have been detailed in

table 11.

82 The total debt to equity rati o for NECA was 114 per cent or 0.88 times.

Income

83 Total income from membership subscriptions for the year ending 30 June 2001 was

$3.2 mi llion. 156 The National Office received income from Chapters and affil iates of

$480 130. 157 The latter figure was not included in the $3.2 million. An additional $9.9 million

was received by NECA, including the National Office, in other income. 158 The bulk of this

income, $5.4 mill ion, was generated by NECA Queensland. 159

84 Th e consolidated income for NECA was $13.6 million for the year ending 30 June 2001. 160 This

rep resented an income to assets ratio of 60 per cen t.

254 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Table 11 NECA Financial Overview ($'000)

National161 NSW1 62 Vic.1 63 Qld1 64 SA165 WA 166 ACT167 Tas. 168Total

Total Assets 1003 6785 4333 3757 1050 5301 89 23 22341

Total Liabi lities 880 3484 1723 2011 110 3675 24 6 11913

Net Assets 122 3300 2610 1746 940 1626 66 17 10428

Core Income 480 916 729 815 274 364 40 39 3657

Non -core Income 1187 1689 752 5357 298 587 24 22 9916

Employer Plumbing and Allied Industry Associations

85 Unlike other industry sectors there exists a distinct lack of co-operation between some of the

associations that represent employers in the plumbing and allied industry. The main

associations are:

• The Master Plumbers and Mechanical Services Association of Australia (MPMSAA)

based in Victoria;

• The Master Plumbers and Mechanical Contractors Association of New South Wales

(MPMCA);

• Master Plumbers Association of Queensland (MPAQ)

• Master Plumbers and Mechanical Services Association of South Australia (M PMSASA);

and

• Master Plumbers and Gasfitters Association of Western Australia (MPGAWA).

86 While there is a degree of co-operation and joint marketing between some of these

organi sations the level of collaboration does not occur to the same extent as with comparative

employer associations. Therefore it is appropriate to deal with each association separately.

• The net assets of MPMSAA for the year ending 30 June 2001 were $3 milli on as provided

in financial records lodged with the Australian Industrial Registry. 169

• The net assets of MPMCA for the year ending 31 December 2001 were $3.5 million as

recorded in accounts lodged with the State industrial reg istry. 170

• The MPAQ financial accounts recorded net assets of $1.7 million for the year end ing

30 April 2001 H 1

• The MPMSASA for the year ending 30 Ju ne 2001 had slightly more than $1 million in net

assets. 172

• The Commission has been advised the MPGAWA has not provided financial accounts to

the State registry in recent years.

87 Further details, as available, have been summarised in table 12 below.

National Perspective Part 1 255

Table 12- Financial Overview ($'000) Plumbing and Allied Industry Associations

MPMSAA173 MPMCANSW174 MPAQ175 MPMSASA176

Total Income 6492 1202 958 968

Total Assets 3894 3737 2462 1107

Total Liabil ities 870 217 751 56

Net Assets 3024 3520 1711 1051

256 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Attachment 2

ACA members

National Perspective Part 1 257

258 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Head Contractors

Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd

Barclay Mowlem Construction

Limited

Bauld erstone Group

Bovis Lend Lease Pty Limited

Clough Group

Activities [In this table, 1 billion= 1000 million]

Abigroup Contractors performs civil, building, water treatment,

networks and telecommunications functions . It completed over

$3.6 billion worth of construction over the past I 0 years.

Abigroup Contractors' projects can be either public or private

and are usually worth between $1 million and $450 million. It

has offices in Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and the ACT. 177

Barclay Mowlem Construction is a multi-disciplined

construction and engineering company operating building, rail,

civil and marine and engineering groups.178 The company

operates in Australia, Papua New Guinea and South East Asia.

In 2001 Barclay Mowlem Construction had an estimated

turnover of $55 1 million , of whi ch the building group

contributed $115 million. On I April 2002 the company

employed 305 people in its building group. 179

Baulderstone Group has fou r integrated business units -transport and infrastructure, building, international and business

services. 180 It is a construction company with annual revenue of

about $1.1 billion. 181 Baulderstone undertakes major building

and infrastructure . projects, such as Colonial Stadium and the

National Gallery of Victoria'Redevelopment.

Bovis Lend Lease commenced operations in Australia in 1951

and operates in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and the ACT. 182 Its skills are in four

main areas - construction, design and engineering , design

management and procurement management. Bovis Lend

Lease operates in 38 countries spanning six continents and has

7500 employees worldwide.183

The Clough Group is a multidisciplinary engineering,

construction, operations and maintenance contractor that

operates in the international oil and gas, minerals, infrastructure

and property industries. 184 It consists of Clough Limited and Clough Engineering Limited , and has five divisions - offshore,

hydrocarbon facilities, minerals and infrastructure, PT Petrosea

Tbk and services. 185

National Perspective Part 1 259

Henry Walker Eltin

John Holland Group Pty Ltd

Leighton Holdings Li mited

Leightons Contractors Pty Ltd

MacMahon Holdings Lim ited

Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd

Henry Walker Eltin operates in the mining, engineering and

environmental sectors in Australia, New Zealand, Africa, South

America, Jamaica and Indonesia. It has three divisions -contracting, transport services and engineering and

infrastructure. 186 Its annual revenue at 30 June 2001 was

$1 .2 bi llion, with a net profit of $17.2 million . At that time it

employed 2956 people. 1B7

John Holland was first established in Victoria in 1 949. It is

part of Leighton Holdings. John Holland operates in bui lding,

civil engineering, process and industrial eng ineering, facilities

management, operations and maintenance, rail construction

and maintenance and telecommunications services .

John Holland's annual national turnover for 2001-02 was $730

million, and it employs over 1500 people. 188

Leighton Holdings is the parent company of Australia's largest

project development and contracting group. It was founded in

Victoria in 1 949 and has grown from a small , privately owned

civil engineering firm into a group that includes Thiess, Leighton

Contractors, Leighton Asia , John Holland and Leighton

Properties. 189 It operates in the engineering and building

construction sector, contract min ing , environmental services ,

operation and maintenance of infrastructure and facilities and

telecommunications services sectors.

Leighton Contractors is a construction contractor and project

developer. It was the original company within the Leighton

Holdings Group. It currently has $900 mi llion worth of

contracts 190 and has between 150 and 200 waged

employees.191

MacMahon Holdings' core businesses are in mining and ci vil

engineering . The total revenue for 2001-02 was $485 million

including joint ventures, and the net profit was $7.1 million. 192

Multiplex is a construction and development company. Since its

inception on 31 July 1962 it has worked on a range of projects

including Sydney's Stadium Australia. It is Australia's largest

private construction and development company, turning over

more than $1 billion in annual revenue. It has offices in eve ry

Australian mainland State and Territory, as well as London, New

Zealand, Dubai , Singapore and Malaysia.193

260 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Thiess Pty Ltd Thiess is a part of the Leighton Holdings Limited Group and is an

engineering and integrated services provider. It operates in the

building, civil en gineering , mining, process engineering, oil and

gas, environmental and utilities services, telecommunications

and facilities operations and maintenance. 194 Thiess had a

turnover of $2 .3 billion in 200 1-02 and employs over 9000 people. 195

Transfield Construction Pty Ltd 196 The Transfield Group of companies provides engineering,

United Group Lim ited

construction, equipment operation and maintenance services in

the road and rail infrastructure , water and waste water, power

and electric ity, mineral process and resources, oil, gas and

petrochemical, urban estate development and defence

sectors. 197 The Group 's turnover in 2000-01 was $1.8 billion. It

owns over $150 million in infrastructure assets and operates

and maintains assets valued at over $3 billion. 198

Transfield has been involved in projects such as the Sydn ey

Harbour Tu nnel, Melbourne City Link, Northside Storage

Tunnel, Eastern Gas Pipelin e, Graham Farmer Freeway,

Bri sbane Airport Rai l Link and Sydney Airport Rail Link.199

Th e United Group Limited is a mechanical and electrical

engineering, fabrication, maintenance and construction

company that operates in the power supply and distribution,

water and waste water processes, mining and mineral

processing, oil gas and liquified natural gas,

telecommunications and heavy haulage railway, an d commuter

transport equipment sectors. It has facilities in 25 locations and

35 site operati ons throughout Australia and overseas,

employing more than 3200 people. 200 In 2002 it reported

earnings of $16.3 mi lli on and revenue of $722.6 million 201

Walter Construction Group Limited Walter Construction Group Lim ited has building and

engineering divisions located in New South Wales, Victoria and

Queensland. It operates in Australia, New Zealand and the Asia

Pacific region 202 The Walter Construction Group building

division contracts in the com mercial and residential high-rise,

correctional , health and other high -technology facilities,

industrial and retail development sectors. The civil engineering

division operates in the areas of water and civil infrastructure,

road bui lding, and the resource and processing sector.203 Its

annual turnover for 2001 was $594 million .204 The net profit was

$0.6 million. The bu ilding division turnover was $357.2 million ,

an d the engineering division turned-over $167.4 million 205

National Perspective Part 1 261

262 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Attachment 3

Union Governance and Objects

National Perspective Part 1 263

264 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union

Governance

The governance structure of the CFMEU has national and divisional elements.

2 In relation to the national structure, the CFMEU Rules provide that the supreme governing body

of the union is the National Conference, which is convened every two years. 206 It consists of all

of the members of all of the union's Divisional Executives 207 Its powers include:

• taking steps to carry out all or any of the objects of the union;

• deciding the general policy of the union;

• imposing penalties on officers , members, representatives, committee members or

delegates for knowingly refusing to comply with the union Rules, or decisions of the

National Conference or the National Executive;

• settling disputes between Divisions;

• establishi ng Divisions; and

• making, altering and rescinding any of the Rules of the union.208

3 The National Executi ve has 'the care, control, superintendence, maintenance and

administration in all respects of the affairs, business , national funds and property of the Union

and has the same powers as the National Conference '.209 1t consists of the National Executive

Committee and the Divisional Branch Secretary of each Divisional Branch of each Division 210

4 The National Executive Committee consists of the National Principal Officers - the National

Secretary of the CFM EU, Divisional Secretaries of the Construction and General Division , the

Forestry, Furni shing, Building Products and Manufacturing Division, Mining and Energy

Division, the full time elected Officers of each Division , two Divisional Assistant Secretaries for

the Forestry, Furnishing, Building Products and Manufacturing Division, and two Divisional

Assistant Secretaries of the Construction and General Division (if not otherwise included) 211

The National Executive Committee sha ll , 'subject to the review of its actions by the Nati onal

Executive , have the care, control, superintendence, management and administration in all

respects of the affairs, business, national funds of the Union '.212

5 As part of the National structure, th ere are State Branches of the union in all States and the

ACT. 213 The State Branches co-ordinate Divisional Branches at a State or Territory level. They

deal with matters affecting on ly that State and more than one Division, and any other matter

that Divisions or Divisional Branches agree should be dealt with by the State Branches.214

6 A Branch is bou nd by the decisions of the National Conference, National Executive, and , in

matters relating affecting one Division on ly, a Divisio nal Executive. Branch Offi cers are bound by

decisions of the National Executive Committee. 215

7 The supreme governing body of a State Bran ch is the State Conference, which is convened

every two years .216 It consists of all of the members of the Divisional Branch Management

Committees for every Divisional Branch of the Union within the State or Territory covered by the

Branch217

National Perspective Part 1 265

8 The State Executive exercises all of the powers of the State Conference, subject to the State

Conference's review.218 It consists of the full time elected officers (State President, Senior Vice

President, Secretary, Assistant Secretary) of each Divisional Branch within the Branch area. The

President of each Divisional Branch (if not otherwise a member of the State Executive) is a

member. Where a Division has more than one Divisional Branch in an area, the Division

determines its representation 2 19

9 The State Branch officers are th e State Secretary, Assistant Secretary, President, Senior Vice

President, Vice President, Assistant Secretary and members of State Executive 220

1 0 In relation to the Divisional Structure of the Construction and General Division , the CFMEU

Construction and General Division and Construction and General Divisional Branches Rules

(C FMEU Construction and General Division Ru les) provide that the supreme governing body of

the Division is the Divisional Conference. 221 It consists of delegates, including full time Divisional

officers elected as delegates. The number of delegates to be elected from each Divisional

Branch depends on the number of members in the Branch. 222 It meets every two years. 223

11 The Divisional Conference powers include:

• taking steps to carry out all or any of the objects of the union as they relate to the

Division;

• deciding the general policy of the Division;

• im posing penalties on officers, members, representatives, committee members or

delegates for knowingly refusing to comply with the CFMEU Construction and General

Division Rules , or decisions of the Divisional Conference, Divisional Executive , or any

Divisional Branch;

• settling disputes between Divisional Branches;

• establishing Divisional Branches of the Division;

• making, altering and rescinding any of the Rules of the Construction and General Division

or any Branch of the Division ;224 and

• having and exercising all the powers of the Divisional Executive 225

12 The Divisional Executive consists of one Divisional President , three joint Divisional Senior Vice

Presidents, th ree Divisional Vice Presidents, Divisional Secretary, two Divisional Assistant

Secretaries, and such Divisional Branch Secretaries who are not elected to any of the

aforementioned positions on the Divisional Executive. 226

13 The Divis ional Executive exercises 'care, control, superintendence, management and

administration in all aspects of the affairs, business, Divisional funds and property of the

Division and have and exercise all of the powers of the Divisional Conference'. 22 7

14 The Principal Officer of the Division is the Divisional Secretary. 228

15 The supreme governing body of each Divisional Branch, except for the Queensland

Construction Workers Divisional Branch, is the Divisional Branch Council, which is convened by

each Divisional Branch Management Committee at least every two years .229

266 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

16 The Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch has the Divisional Branch

Management Committee as its highest governing body, and it meets not less than three times per year. 230

17 The Divisional Branch Council for each State and the ACT is separately specified , each

consists of at least the Divisional Branch President, Secretary and Assistant Secretary

(members of the Divisional Management Committee), and a number of councillors, which vary in number from Branch to Branch.231

18 The Divisional Branch Council's powers include:

• taking steps to carry out all or any of the objects of the union;

• directing the policy of the Divisional Branch;

• amending, adding to the Rules (subject to Rule 16); and

• directing the Divisional Branch Management Committee to carry out any of the provisions

of the Rules or the performance of any duties. 232

19 The composition of the Divisional Branch Management Committee for each Divisional Branch is separately specified in the Rules. 233 The Committee's responsibilities include:

• carrying out duties as directed by the Divisional Branch Council;

• control and supervision of all officers;

• dealing with applications for membership, claims for tool and funeral benefit, and grants

from contingent funds;

• make provision for the registration of members for employment;

• convening and conducting general meetings of the members;

• calling meetings necessary for the proper administration of the Divisional Branch;

• imposing penalties on Divisional Branch officers, councillors , members, committee

persons or delegates for knowingly refusing to comply with the Rules or decisions of the

Divisional Branch Council or Management Committee;

• suspending, expelling or dismissing from office Divisional Branch officers, council lors,

members, committee members or delegates; 234 and

• appointing shop stewards or delegates.235

20 The Victorian Divisional Branch has a Divisional Branch Executive Committee, which consists of the Divisional Branch President, three Vice Presidents, Secretary and Assistant Secretary.

This Committee meets at least fortnightly, and has the care, control, superintendence,

management and administration of the affairs, funds and property of the Divisional Branch in

between meetings of the Di vi sional Branch Management Committee. The Executive

Committee's actions are reviewable by the Management Committee. 236

National Perspective Part 1 267

Objects

21 CFM EU sees its core responsibilities as the wages, working conditions and safety of building

workers. 237

22 The objects of CFMEU are:

1. To uphold the right of combination of labour, and to improve, protect, and foster

the best interests of the Union and its members, and to assist them to obtain their

rights under industrial and social legislation;

2. To regulate the conditions under which all members of the Union may be

employed;

3. To affiliate to, federate with, amalgamate with, or otherwise combine with any trade

or industrial Union, or association, or association of Trade Unions or any other

organisation having objects similar in whole or in part to the objects of this Union,

4. To establish a fund for the assistance and support of Trade Unionists and to carry

out the foregoing objects;

5. To establish a funeral and other benefit funds;

6. To establish Branches, Divisions, Divisional Branches, Sub-branches, Districts or

Sections of the Union throughout the Commonwealth of Australia;

7. To further any scheme that has for its object the establishment of Labor Research

and Information Bureaux, and to assist in the establishment and maintenance of

Labour and Trade Union newspapers and wireless broadcasting and television

stations, and to invest in shares in such newspapers and radio and television

stations;

8. To constitute, conduct, carry on and manage clubs in the interests of members;

9. To pay affilia tion fees to and assist financially or otherwise any bona fide labour or

Trade Union Organisation or Association;

10. To establish and manage a Union Journal or Journals;

11. To hold, purchase, lease, sell, mortgage or otherwise deal in property;

12. To enter into contracts and agreements for the purpose of furthering directly or

indirectly any one or more of these objects;

13. To raise money by levies and/or other means for the purpose of carrying on the

objects of the Union;

14. To render legal and other assistance to members for the recovery of wages or

compensation for injuries, to protect the Interests of the trade in all its Branches,

and to assist other trades by any legal method;

15. To obtain such other objects as the National Conference or National Executive shall

from time to time determine;

16. To organise the education of workers;

268 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

1 7. To establish a fund from which to provide retiring allowances to fulltime officers and

employees of the Union, its Divisional or Divisional Branches;

18. The advancement of members intellectually, morally and socially and to do all

things which, in the opinion of the Union, is in the interest of members including

donations to political parties, the achievement of compulsory unionism, preference

in employment, retrenchment, promotion, demotion and transfer in employment,

the production and distribution of newspapers, journals and the like;

19. To achieve such other objects as may be lawfully adopted by any Division of the

Union;

20. To raise political levies, donate to and/or affiliate with political parties and to partake in conciliation and/or arbitration systems in the States and for that purpose to have

Branches, divisions or divisional branches in the States. 238

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Governance

23 The CEPU is governed by the National Council which has 'exclusive power to deal with matters

affecting more than one division and the general control and conduct of the business',

incl uding determining and implementing policy; making, amending and rescinding Rules

(subject to Rule 21 ); and resolving disputes between divisions 2 39

24 Members of the National Council include the Divisional Secretaries of the Electrical and

Plumbing Divisions; 12 delegates, one from each Divisional Branch of the Electrical and Plumbing Divisions; two delegates from the two largest Electrical Division Branches; and the

two Assistant Divisional Branch Secretaries from the Victorian and New South Wales Branches

of the Plumbing Division. 240

25 The National Executi ve exercises the powers of the National Council in between National

Council meetings, subject to some restrictions relating to making, amending and rescinding

Rules and processing disciplinary charges against union members 241

26 The National Executive Officers are the National President, National Vice President, National

Secretary, and National Assistant Secretary. 242 There are also 12 National Executive members

representing each of the Divisions , including three from each of the Electrical and Plumbing

Divisions. 243

27 The Electrical and Plumbing Divisions each have a Divisional Council. The Electrical Division

Divisional Council controls the Division. 244 Its powers include: auth orising the formation of

El ectrical Division Branches; deciding on the policy of the Division in all matters affecting the

members; electing, suspending or removing officers of the Division; settling disputes between

electrical Division Branches and Divisional Sub-Branches and sections; and making, amending

and rescinding rules of the Division 245

National Perspective Part 1 269

28 The Electrical Division Divisional Council consists of the Divi sional Secretary and delegates from

each branch of the Division.246 The number of branch delegates selected from each Bran ch

depends on membership size. 247

29 Between meetings of Electrical Division Divisional Council, the Divisional Executi ve is in charge

of the business of the Division. The Executive consists of the Divisional President, Divisional

Vice Presidents, Divisional Secretary and members elected from the Divisional Conference

delegates. 248

30 Each Divisional Branch is governed by the:

• Divisional Branch Conference;

• Di vi sional State Council; and

• Divisional Branch Executive .

31 The Divisional Branch President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer are President, Vice

President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Conference, Council and Executive. These office

holders are the Divisional Branch Officers. 249

32 The Divisional Branch Conference has the power to recommend the alteration of Divisional

Branch rules in accordance with Rule 3, and to formulate Divisional Branch policy250 A

Divisional Branch conference is held at least every alternate year. The number of delegates who

are elected by their respective Divisional Sub-Branches is determined with regard to numbers

of financial members.251

33 Each Divisional Branch has a Divisional State Council. The government of the Divis ional Branch vested in the Council, subject to the Powers of the Divisional Branch Conference252 The

number of Divisional State Councillors elected by their respective sections is determined with

regard to numbers of financial members. 253 Secti ons are constituted either by the following

groups, on a geographical basis, or as determined by the Divisional Branch State Council:

• members employed in the general trade;

• members employed by supply authorities;

• members employed by the transport industry;

• members employed in the manufacturing industry;

• members employed as salaried officers;

• members employed in the radio, television and electronics and communications

industries;

• members employed in the electrical contracting industry; and

• in Western Australia, members employed in the foundry industry. 254

34 Divisional Sub-Branches may be formed, and may be determined by the Divisional State

Council. 255

35 The Divisional Branch Executive consists of the Divisional Branch President, Secretary, and one member from each of th e sectio ns as represented on the Divisional State Council. 256 The

270 Final Report of the Royal Commission in to the Building and Construction Industry

Officers of a Divisional Branch are the President, Vice President, Treasurer, Divisional Branch

Secretary, Assistant Secretaries, Organisers and Trustees.257

36 The Divisional Branches, subject to powers conferred on the Divisional Council and Divisional Executive, have the power to make rules and by-laws for the management of the Divisional

Branches and any of its divisional sub-branches or agencies.258 These rules and by-laws have

no effect until endorsed by the Divisional Executive or Divisional Council.

37 The Plumbing Division Divisional Council exercises the supreme control vested in the Division's

members on their behalf. 259 The Plumbing Division Divisional Council's powers are similar to

those of the Electrical Division Divisional Counc il .260

38 The Plumbing Division Divisional Council Officers are the Divisional President, Divisional Deputy President, General Secretary and Assistant General Secretary, who are elected by an d from the

members of the Divisional Counci1 261

39 The Divisional Executive of the Plumbing Division has all the powers of the Divisional Council between meetings of the Divisional Council. 262 The Divisional Executive consists of the Federal

Vice Presidents and each Officer of the Divisional Council 2 63

40 The business of each Branch and Sub-Branch of the Pl umbing Division is , subject to the review and control of a Special or General Meeting of the Branch, conducted by a Committee of

Management. The Committee consists of the Branch President , Vice President, Secretary,

Assistant Secretary, two Branch Trustees, Branch Organisers, and not more than nine other

Committee members.264

41 Each Branch has the power to make such Rules 'as may be deemed necessary for the better

working and control of the Branch, always providing such Rules are not inconsistent with the

Rules of the Union '.265 Eac h Branch may formulate Sub-Branch Rules 266

Objects

42 The objects of the CEPU are:

3. 1 To enrol in the Union persons eligible to be members.

3.2 To advance the interests of members and secure a proper classification structure

with appropriate rates of pay

3. 3 To ensure adequate training is available for members including the maintenance of

the principles of the apprenticeship system.

3.4 To ensure that award rates of pay and other provisions adequately reflect the

training and skills of members.

3.5 To advance and protect the vocational interests of members including seeking and

maintaining representation of all relevant authorities, committees and bodies.

3. 6 To provide legal protection for members with respect to industrial and work injury

related matters where deemed necessary

3. 7 To assist members in the event of unemployment, sickness, injury, mortality or

industrial dispute.

National Perspective Part 1 2 71

3.8 To establish Divisions, Branches and Sub Branches of the Union and organise

members into Divisions, Branches and Sub Branches throughout Australia.

3.9 To publish a union journal, newspaper or other media.

3. 10 To advance the living and working conditions of workers and their families, and to

assist kindred Unions and other bodies having these objectives.

3. 11 To affiliate to, federate with, amalgamate with, or otherwise combine with any

trade, industrial union or association or any political party or any other organisation

having objects similar in whole or in part to the objects of this Union.

3. 12 To hold, purchase, lease, mortgage, sell or otherwise deal in property.

3. 13 To make financial provision for the carrying out of these objectives.

3. 14 To uphold the right of combination of labour, and to improve, protect and foster the

best interests of the Union and its members, and to assist them to obtain their

rights under industrial and social legislation.

3. 15 To secure preference of employment for unionists.

3. 16 To establish and maintain an employment bureau for members.

3. 1 7 To contribute to any charitable institution that the members may decide.

3. 18 To constitute, conduct, carry on and manage clubs, holiday and rest centres of

members.

3. 19 To co-operate and maintain social contact with members, other unions, labour

bodies and socially responsible organisations both in Australia and overseas.

3.20 To be involved, whether on a Divisional basis or as the whole union, in socially

responsible citizen actions.

3.21 To assist in the establishment and/or maintenance of labour newspapers and other media.

3.22 To bring about the socialisation of production, distribution and exchange and the

development and protection of effective enterprises.

3.23 To promote the policy of equality of status and opportunity for all members.

3.24 To adopt, promote and implement family friendly policies for union employees and

officials.

3. 25 To increase the number of women employed by the union.

3. 26 To ensure there is equal employment and career path opportunity for female union

employees.

3.27 To increase the number of female members.

3.28 To encourage the participation by women in union activities and decision making bodies.

272 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

3.29 To pursue such other objects as the Council and/or the various Divisions or

Divisional Branches shall from time to time determine being consistent with the

express wishes of the membership as determined by these Rules.

3.30 To establish Trust Funds for the benefit of the Members. 267

Australian Workers' Union

Governance

43 The highest deliberative body of the AWU is the National Conference, which is held every two

years. 268 Its powers include:

• taking steps to carry out all or any of the objects of the union;

• deciding the general policy of the union and taking steps to enforce the carrying out of such policy;

• dealing with and deciding any matter submitted to it by any Branch of the union;

• making, altering, amending or rescinding Rul es for the union and any Branch;

• establishing or closing Branches, Sub-Branches, or Districts of the union;

• confirming, overruling or otherwise dealing with decisions of the National Executive; and

• exercising all or any powers of the National Executive. 269

44 Below the level of the National Conference is the Nationa! Executive that, subject to review of

its actions by the Conference, 'has the care, control, superintendence, management and

administration in all respects of the affairs, business, funds and property of the Union' 270 Its powers include:

• interpreting and enforcing the general policy of the union as decided by Conference;

• deciding questions of policy not covered by Conference decisions;

• controlling and conducting the business and affairs of the union while the National Conference is not in session;

• establishing or closing any Branch of the union;

• ensuring that officers, committeemen, delegates, members and Branches carry out the

Rules , decisions and policy of the union;

• taking action in accordance with the Rules to secure the satisfactory working of any

Branch, Sub-Branch or District; and

• appointing, controlling and dismissing National Organisers. 271

45 Branches are represented at the National Executive by their Branch secretary. If the Branch has

more than 11 000 members, the Branch is entitled to an additional delegate. 272

46 The highest authority of any Branch is the Branch Executive, except in the case where Districts

have been formed, and in that case, the Delegate Meeting convened by the Branch is the

National Perspective Part 1 2 7 3

highest authority. When the Delegate Meeting is not in session , then the Branch Executive is

the highest authority in such Branches.273

47 The Branch Executive 'has general control and conduct of the business of the Branch, and acts on its own behalf in all matters', subject to the Rules and decisions of the National

Conference and Executive.274

48 A Branch Executive may form Local Committees in any town or district to perform such

advisory functions as the Branch Executive determines.

49 For those Branches with Districts, the Branch Delegate Meetings are held annually, and are attended by the President and Secretary of the Branch , the District Secretaries, and delegates

elected by the members of the various Districts.275

Objects

50 The objects of the AWU include:

• To uphold the rights of combination of labour and to improve, protect and foster the best

interests of its members and to assist them to obtain their rights under industrial and

social legislation;

• To regulate and protect the conditions of labour, the relations between workers and

between workers and employers. To regulate conditions on the conduct of trade,

business or industry of the members;

• To promote the general and material welfare of the members;

• To provide legal assistance in defence of members' rights where deemed necessary;

• To endeavour by political action to secure social justice;

• To establish and maintain a union newspaper;

• To establish one union for Australian workers;

• To uphold the authority of constitutional government and the Constitution of the

Commonwealth of Australia and the States and to oppose the growth of doctrines and

groups or organisations of persons incorporated or unincorporated which in the opinion

of the National Executive advocate, assist or encourage the overthrow by force or

violence of the established Government of the Commonwealth of Australia;

• To affiliate to, federate with, amalgamate with , or otherwise combine with, any trade or

industrial union or association, or association of trade unions or any other organisation

having objects similar in whole or part to the objects of this union. To establish joint

organisation and joint finance with other trade unions as a step towards amalgamation;

• To establish a fund for the assistance and support of trade unionists and to carry out

these objects;

• To assist in the establishment and maintenance of labour and trade union newspapers

and electronic media facilities and to invest in shares of such newspaper and electronic

media facilities;

2 7 4 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• To constitute, conduct, carry on and manage clubs in the interests of members;

• To raise money by contributions, levies and commercial investments for th e purpose of carrying out the objects of the union;

• To establi sh funeral and other benefit funds;

• To establish Branches of the union throughout the Commonwealth of Australia;

• To contribute financially and otherwise to political objects, so as to bring about the election of Federal and State Labor Governments;

• To protect the trade objects of members by any legal method;

• To inform members and potential members as to matters of interest and concern either industrially, politically or socially;

• To assist members with both trade union and vocational training;

• Generally to improve the conditions and promote the interests of members of the union

industrially, politically and socially and to do all things as are conducive to the attainment

of the above objects and which industrial organisations of employees may lawfu lly do. 276

Australian Manufacturing Workers Union

Governance

51 The government of the AMWU is entrusted to a National Conference, which meets every two

years . The National Conference consists of the National Council, metals and engineering

members delegates and delegates from each of the Divisions. The metals and engineering

members delegates are nominated and elected from metals and engineering members of the union in each State. 277

52 Any metals and engineering financial member resident in the Northern Territory, and qualified in accordance with the Rules, may be nominated by five other metals and engineering members

in the Northern Territory to be a delegate to the National Conference. The elected delegate

becomes part of the Queensland State Delegation 278

53 The National Conference is the supreme governing body of the AMWU, and its powers include:

• taking all steps to carry out all or any of the objects of the union;

• deciding th e general policy of the union and taking steps to enforce the carryi ng out of

such policy;

• imposing penalties in accordance with the AMWU Rules;

• making, altering , amending or rescinding the AMWU Rules or adopting new Rules;

• confirm ing, over-ruli ng or otherwise dealing with any decision of the National Council; and

• exercising all or any of the powers of National Council. 279

National Perspective Part 1 2 7 5

54 There is a National Council that is comprised of the National President, the National Secretary,

the State Secretaries from each State, Divisional representatives and metals and engineering

delegates 280 The metals and engineering delegates are:

• the Assistant National Secretary (Metals and Engineering Members);

• the National Organiser(s) (Metals and Engineering Members);

• the Assistant State Secretaries (Metals and Engineering Members) of the States of

Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland;

• one delegate representing all States other than Victoria, New South Wales and

Queensland; and

• one rank and file delegate (a member who has not been elected and does not hold a full ­

time office in the union) 281

55 The National Council is the Committee of Management of the Union, and operates subject to

the National Conference and the AMWU Rules. It has 'the care, control, superintendence, and

management in all respects of the affairs, business, funds and property of the Union'. Its

powers include:

• interpreting the Ru les , and interpreting and enforcing the general policy as decided by the

National Conference;

• determining matters of policy not covered by Conference decisions;

• controlling and conducting the business and affairs of the union while the Conference is

not in session;

• ensuring that officers and Committees of the union carry out the rules, decisions and

policies of the union and impose penalties in accordance with th e Rules; and

• control and supervise the work of the National Officers of the union. 282

56 The National Officials of the AMWU are the National President, National Secretary, Assistant

National Secretaries (from the metals and engineering members and from the Divisions),

National Organisers (metals and eng ineering members); and Assistant Secretary and National

Organisers from each Division . 283

57 Below the National Council is the National Administrative and Budget Committee, which is

made up of the National President, National Secretary, Assistant National Secretary and

Federal Secretary of each Divis ion; Assistant National Secretary (metals and engineering

members), each State Secretary and a Printing Division representative 284

58 The Committee is responsible for the union's administrative affairs in accordance with Rules

and policies of National Conference and National Council between meetings of those bodies. It

refers any matters relating to the union's rules, po licy or organisation to the National

Conference or National Council and develops draft budgets for the National Council 's consideration and monitors and administers the implementation of the National Council 's budgets. 285

2 7 6 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

59 In each State, there is a governance structure which primarily mirrors the national structure with

a few regional variations. There is a State Conference, the members of which include: the State

President; State Secretary and Assistant State Secretaries; and metals and engineering

delegates and the Division 's delegates to the State Conference. In the case of metals and

engineering delegates, there is one delegate for every 500 members, except in Tasmania where

there is one delegate for every 250 members. 286

60 The State Conference meets every two years and has similar powers to the National

Conference, but only within its particular State. 287

61 Below the State Conference is the State Council, which includes the State President, State

Vice-President, State Secretary and Assistant State Secretaries, metals and engineering

delegates from the State Conference, and delegates from each of the other Divisions . The

metals and engineering delegates are made up of organisers and rank and file members, the numbers of which vary from state to state. 288

62 The State Council serves as the executive body of the State Conference, and it generally

directs the work of the union in the particular State 289 Its duties include supervising and

directing the work of all full time Officers, District Committees and other union Committees; and

authorising the appointment of or election by members of shop stewards 290 It has the power

to establish District Committees, Trade and Section Committees. 291

63 There is a State Administrative Committee that acts as the Administrative Committee of the

State Conference and the State Council and administers the affairs of the union in accordance

with the policies of the National Conference, National Co.uncil, State Conference and State

Council. 292

Objects

64 The objects of AMWU include:

• The control of industry in the interests of the community;

• The organisation of all workers qualified for membership, the development of the most cordial relations with other unions in the industry with a view to bringing into existence of

one union for the foundry, engineering, ship-building and kindred trades , and the

obtaining and maintaining of just and proper hours of work, rates of wages, and

conditions of labour;

• The negotiation and settlement of differences and disputes between the members of the

union and employers by collective bargaining and agreement, withdrawal of labour or

otherwise;

• Generally to promote the welfare of the members of the union;

• The provision of legal advice and assistance to members where necessary or expedient;

• The furtherance of political object as provided by these rules;

• The advancement of the interests of women and non-English speaking background

workers in the workplace and within the Union through the development of equal

opportunity and affirmative action policies .293

National Perspective Part 1 277

278 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Attachment 4

State Tribunals

National Perspective Part 1 279

280 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

The Legislative Framework of the Tribunals

New South Wales

The Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales is established under s145 of the

Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW). It consists of a President, a Vice- President, Deputy

Presidents and Commissioners. 294 All but the Commissioners are Presidential Members.

2 The Commission's functions are to: set remuneration and other conditions of employment;

resolve industrial disputes; hear and determine other industrial matters; inquire into and report

on, any industrial matter or other matter referred to it by the Minister; and any other functions

conferred on it by the Act or any other New South Wales Act or law295 In th e exercise of its

functions the Commission must take into account the public interest and, for that purpose,

must have regard to the objectives of th e Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), and the state of

the economy of New South Wales and the likely effect of its decision on that economy. 296

3 The Commission may be constituted by one member or by a Full Bench of at least three members. A Full Bench must include at least one Presidential Member and at least one Commissioner. 297

4 The President may designate particular members as regional members for different regions of

the State. The President must designate particular Deputy Presidents to deal with matters

relating to general award reviews or discrimination in the workplace. 298

5 The Governor of New South Wales may appoint a Presidential Member to be a Member of the

Commission in Court Session. 299 Th e Members of the Commission in Court Session are

judicial members of the Commission . The Commission in Court Session is established as a superior court of record and is a court of equivalent status to the NSW Supreme Court and the

NSW Land and Environment Court300

6 Broadly speaking, the Commission in Court Session exercises the judicial functions of the Commission conferred under the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) 301

7 The Commission 's procedures and powers are described in Chapter 4, Part 5 of the Act 302

8 The Commission is not bound to act in a formal manner; is not bound by the rules of evidence and may inform itself on any matter in any way it considers just; and must act according to the

substantial merits of the case without regard to technicalities or legal forms 303

9 The Commission is empowered to summons witnesses, compel examination on oath or affirmation, compel production of documents and direct that a witness be prosecuted for perjury.304

10 A party is entitled to be legally represented, save that at conciliation proceedings the

entitlement requires leave of the Commission .305

11 The Commission has power to order that a secret ballot be taken of any group of employees in

order to find out their opinion about an industrial matter.306

12 The Commission has power to order costs. Except when the Commission is in Court Session ,

costs can only be awarded where the application is frivolous or vexatious, or where

proceedings are instituted without reasonable cause, or where proceedings are brought for a

National Perspective Part 1 28 1

breach of an industrial instrument (defined in s8 to mean an award, an enterprise agreement, a

public sector industrial agreement, a former industrial agreement, a contract determination or a

contract agreement), or where proceedings are brought for the recovery of money for breach of an industrial agreement,307

Victoria

13 In 1996 Victoria referred many of its industrial relations powers to the Commonwealth, pursuant

to the Commonwealth Powers (Industrial Relations) Act 1996 (Vic). In turn, the Commonwealth

enacted the Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1996 (C'wth)

that, among other things , extended the operation of various Commonwealth provisions to

Victoria, including enterprise bargaining provisions. This extension is now reflected in Part XV of

the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth).

14 Accordingly there is no Victorian industrial relations commission. In Victoria, subject to the

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), industrial matters are heard and determined by the

Australian Industrial Relations Commission. Only Victoria has referred its industrial re lations

power to the Commonwealth.

Queensland

15 Chapter 8 of the Industrial Relations Act 1999 (Old) provides for the continued existence of the

Industrial Court of Queensland and the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission. 308

16 The Queensland Industrial Relations Commission comprises the President, the Vice-President,

a Commissioner's Administrator and at least six other Commissioners.309

17 The Commission's jurisdiction is set out in s265. It is:

The Commission may hear and decide the following matters -

(a) all questions of law or fact brought before it or that it considers expedient to hear

and decide for the regulation of a calling ['calling' defined to mean the craft,

manufacture, occupation, trade, undertaking or vocation or a section of any of

those activities'};

(b) all questions-

(i) arising out of an industnal matter; or

(ii) involving deciding the rights and duties of a person in relation to an industrial

matter; or

(iii) it considers expedient to hear and decide about an industrial matter;

(c) an industrial dispute, referred to the Commission by a member [of the Commission]

who has held a conference under this Act at which no agreement has been

reached;

(d) all appeals properly made to it under this or another Act;

(e) all matters committed to the Commission by this or another Act.

18 'Industrial matter' is defined in the Act as:

2 82 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

a matter that affects or relates to -(a) work done or to be done; or

(b) the privileges, rights or functions of-

(i) employers, employees; or

(ii) persons who have been, or propose to be, or who may become, employers

or employees; or

(c) a matter (whether or not an industrial matter as defined in this section) that the

court or commission considers has been, is, or may be a cause or contributory

cause of an industrial action or industrial dispute. 310

19 'Industrial dispute' is defined to mean:

(a) a dispute, including a threatened or probable dispute, about an industrial matter, or

(b) a situation that is likely to give rise to a dispute about an industrial matter. 311

20 The jurisdiction of the Industrial Court of Queensland is established under s248 of the Act. That

section provides:

(1) The Court may-

(a) perform all functions and exercise all powers prescribed for the Court by this

or another Act; and

(b) hear and decide cases stated to it by the commission; and

(c) hear and decide an offence against this Act, other than an offence for which

jurisdiction is expressly conferred on [an industrial magistrate of the Industrial Magistrates Court]; and

(d) hear and decide appeals from an industrial magistrate's decision in

proceedings for-(ij an offence against this Act; or

(ii) recovery of damages, or other amounts, under this Act; and

(e) exercise the jurisdiction and powers of the Supreme Court [of Queensland} to

ensure, by prerogative order or other appropriate process-(i) the commission and magistrates exercise their jurisdictions according

to law; and

(ii) the commission and magistrates do not exceed their jurisdictions.

(2) In proceedings, the court may-

(a) make the decisions it considers appropriate, irrespective of specific relief

sought by a party;

(b) give directions about the hearing of a matter.

National Perspective Part 1 283

(3) The court's jurisdiction is not limited, by implication, by a provision of this or another

Act.

21 The President of the Court is also the President of the Commission .312

South Australia

22 Section 7 of the Industrial and Employee Relations Act 7 994 (SA) provides for the various

industrial authorities which administer industrial relations in South Australia.

23 The Industrial Relations Commission consists of two Divisions: the Industrial Relations Division

and the Enterprise Agreement Division .313

24 The jurisdiction of the Commission is conferred by s26 of the Act which provides:

The Commission has-

(a) jurisdiction to approve enterprise agreements regulating remuneration and other

industrial matters; and

(b) jurisdiction to make awards regulating remuneration and other industrial matters;

and

(c) jurisdiction to resolve industrial disputes; and

(d) jurisdiction to hear and determine any matter or thing arising from or relating to an

industrial matter; and

(e) other jurisdiction conferred by this Act.

25 The Commission has jurisdiction to inquire into, and report and make recommendations to the

Minister on, a question related to an industrial or other matter that is referred to the

Commission for inquiry by the Minister. 314

26 The Commission consists of the President of the Commission, Deputy Presidents of the

Commission and Commissioners. Each is appointed for a term of six years, and may be

reappointed for one further term of six years.3 15

27 Before a person may be appointed (or reappointed) as the President, or Deputy President or a

Commissioner of the Commission, the Minister must consult confidentially about the proposed appointment with a panel consisting of -(a) a nom1nee of the United Trades and Labor Council; and

(b) a nominee of the South Australian Employers' Chamber of Commerce and

Industry; and

(c) a nominee of the House of Assembly appo1nted by resolution of that House; and

(d) a nominee of the Legislative Council appointed by resolution of the Council; and

(e) the Commissioner of Public Employment. 316

28 For the purposes of the consultation, the Minister must inform the members of the panel of all

persons short -listed for appointment. 317

284 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

29 All members of the Commission enjoy security of tenure 3 18 A Commissioner must be

appointed as an Industrial Re lations Commissioner or as an Enterprise Agreement Commissioner or both319

30 Section 34(5) provides for an equal number of Industrial Relations Commissioners with

employee or employer associated interests.

An Industrial Relations Commissioner must be a person of standing in the community

with experience in industrial affairs either through association with interests of employees or through association with interests of employers and the number of Industrial Relations

Commissioners of the former class must be equal to, or differ by no more than one from,

the number of Industrial Relations Commissioners of the latter class (part-time

Commissioners being counted for the purpose of this subsection by reference to the

proportion of full-time work undertaken).

31 Section 37 of the Act allows a member of the Commission, with the Minister's approval, to be

appointed as a member of 'an industrial authority under the law of the Commonwealth or another State' . The defi nition of industrial authorities would include the Australian Industrial

Relations Commission and State industrial tribunals. There are presently four Commissioners

and one Deputy President. All hold appointments as members of the Australian Industrial

Relations Commission under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C 'wth).

32 The Industrial Relations Court of South Australia is a court of record. 320 The Court is empowered to:

• interpret an award or enterprise agreement;

• hear and determine questions of law referred to it by the Industrial Relations Commission

of South Australia;

• hear and determine jurisdictional or other questions about the valid ity of determinations

of the Commission;

• make declaratory judgments;

• hear and determine monetary claims of the kinds described in that section; and

• to make injunctive orders against a person who contravenes or fai ls to comply with the

Act, an award or an enterprise agreement made under the Act. 321

33 Section 16 of the Industrial and Employee Relations Act 1994 (SA) provides:

The Court's judiciary consists of-

( a) the Senior Judge of the Court; and

(b) the other Judges of the Court; and

(c) the industrial magistrates.

34 The Senior Judge is the principal judicial officer of the Court and is responsible for the

administration of the Court. The Senior Judge is a District Court Judge assig ned by the

Governor of South Australia to be Senior Judge of the Industrial Relations Court or a person

eligible for appointment as a District Court Judge appointed by the Governor to be Senior

National Perspective Part 1 285

Judge of the Industrial Relations Court. Other judges of the Court are assigned or appointed by the Governor in like manner322

35 An industrial magistrate is a magistrate under the Mag1strates Act 1983 (SA), proclaimed by the

Governor to be an industrial magistrate . There may be as many industrial magistrates as the Governor considers necessary. 323

36 Section 20 of the Act causes the Court's judiciary to be divided between members of its

principal judiciary (those who are occupied predominantly in the Court) and its ancillary judiciary

(those who are not occupied predominantly in the Court).

Western Australia

37 The Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission, by that name, is constituted under the

Industrial Arbitration Act 1979 (WAj.3 24 The Commission is a continuation of the Western

Australian Industrial Commission established under the repealed lndustnal Relations Act 1912

(WA) (repealed in 1 979). The Commission consists of a President, a Chief Commissioner, a

Senior Commissioner and such number of other Commissioners as may be necessary for the

purposes of the Act. 325 A member of the Commission 'has in the performance of his functions

and duties as such a member .. . the same protection and immunity as a Judge of the Supreme

Court of Western Australia' 326 and may, subject to certain conditions, hold a dual appointment

to and be a member of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. 327

38 Section 22B of the Act provides:

In the performance of its functions the Commission is to act with as much speed as the

requirements of this Act and a proper consideration of the matter before it permit.

39 Under s23, the Commission has, subject to the Act, cognizance of and authority to enquire into

and deal with any industrial matter. 328 1ndustrial matter is defined in s7(1) as:

any matter affecting or relating or pertaining to the work, privileges, rights, or duties of

employers or employees in any Industry or of any employer or employee therein.

40 The definition of industrial matter particularises a number of items in respect of which any

'matter affecting or relating or pertaining to ' falls within the definition of 'industrial matter'.

Where any employer and employee are parties to any workplace agreement entered into under

the Workplace Agreements Act 1993 (WA), any matter that is part of the relationship between

that employer and employee is not an industrial matter329

Ta smania

41 The Tasmanian Industrial Commission is constituted under s5 of the Industrial Relations Act

1984 (Tas.). The Commission consists of 'such number of members appointed by the

Governor [of Tasmania] as the Governor considers is necessary to perform the functions of the

Commission under th is Act'. 330 Under s5(5), the Governor appoints a President and a Deputy

President of the Commission.'

42 The Tasman ian Industrial Commission has jurisdiction to hear and determine matters and

things arising from or relating to industrial matters, including making of awards, the conduct of

hearings and the settling of disputes 331

286 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

43 A Commissioner is appointed for seven years, and on such terms and conditions as are

specified in the instrument of appointment. A Commissioner may be re-appointed. 332

44 Commiss ion ers have the same protection and immunity as a judge in the performance of their functions as a Commissioner.333

45 Section 16 of the Industrial Relations Act 1984 (Tas.) empowers the President to request the

President of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission to nominate a member of the

Australian Industrial Relations Commission to deal with the whole or any part of a matter before

the Tasmanian Industrial Commission . Where a member of the Australian Industrial Relations

Commission is so nominated, the President of the Tasmanian Industrial Commission may refer a matter, who lly or in part, to that nominee, who may then exercise all the powers that are

exercisable by a Commissioner of the Tasmanian Commission under the Tasmanian Act. A

decision made by the nominated member of the Australian Industrial Relati ons Commission

shall, for the purposes of the Tasmanian Act, be deemed to be an award or order, as the case

may require, made by the Tas manian Industri al Commission under the Tasmanian Act. 334

46 Section 17 of the Act enables a Commissioner to sit in joint proceedings of the Tasmanian

Commission and the Australian Industrial Relations Commission where the proceedings are on

the same or a similar matter. A determination to be made at any time, and on such terms as the

President thinks fit , not to deal with a matter in joint proceedings 335 Th e President of the

Tasmanian Industrial Commission is a Presidential member of the AIRC. 336

47 One of the purposes of the Industrial Relations Act 1984 (Tas .) is to encourage workplace

bargaining. 337

Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory

48 Neither the Australian Capital Territory nor the Northern Territory has its own workplace

relations legislation , Commission or industrial registry. The Workplace Relations Act 1996

(C 'wth), applies in both Territories. Th e AIRC sits in both Territories and has registries in both.

The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) is the Act that governs workplace relations

concerning the building and construction industry in each Territory.

Awards and Certified Agreements

New South Wales

49 The New South Wales Industrial Relations Commission is empowered to make awards, and to

make enterprise agreements, under Chapter 2, Parts 1 and 2, respectively, of the Industrial

Relations Act 1996 (NSW).

50 The Commission is empowered , under s 1 0 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), to

'make an award in accordance with this Act settin g fair and reasonable conditions of

employment for employees' .

51 Unlike the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth), an award made under the New South Wales

Act is binding on all employees and employers to which it relates, whether or not they were a

party to the making of the award, and an award that applies to a particular in dustry is, subject

to its terms, taken to bind all employees and employers engaged in that industry. 338 Subject to

National Perspective Part 1 287

an award's terms , it is bindin g on all industrial organisations that were a party to the making of

that award 339

52 An award under the New South Wales Act must be in writing, expressed to be an award and signed by at least one member of the Commission.340 It must contain procedures for the

resolution of industri al disputes under the award, but it need not contain such procedures if the

Commission is satisfied that another specified award already does so . Dispute resolution

procedures must include procedures for consultation at the workplace and the involvement of

relevant industrial organisations. Dispute resol ution procedures in awards do not apply to

employers who employ fewer than 20 employees, unless the award specifically applies those

procedures to such an employer341

53 The Commission in Court Session (referred to above) or a Local Court constituted speci fi cal ly for the purposes of Chapter 7, Part 1, of the Act by an Industrial Magistrate may hear

proceedings for breach of an award and order a person to pay a pecuniary penalty not

exceeding $10 000 (as a civil penalty) if satisfied of the breach. 342 Legal proceedings relating to

the enforcement of the award can only be commenced after seven days fol lowin g the day on

which it is published in th e NSW lndustn8J Gazette 3 43

54 An award applies for a specified period (its nominal term) and , after that period, until rescinded

by the Commission. A nominal term of an award must be at least 12 months but not more than

three years An award that sets conditions of employment in connection wi th a project may

have a specified nominal term that does not exceed the expected duration of the project.344

55 The Commission may vary or rescind an award, and may do so in the course of arbitration by the Commission to resolve an industrial dispute 345

56 Th e Commission must review each award at least every three years to modernise awards, consolidate awards rel ating to the same industry and rescind obsolete awards. It must take into

account decisions of the Commission, rates of remu neration and other minimum conditions of

employment, part ti me, casual, an d job sharing work arrangements, dispute resolution

procedures , discrimination issues, obsolete provisions or unnecessary technicalities, and th e

effects of the award on producti vity and efficiency in the industry concerned. 346

57 Enterprise agreements may be made under Chapter 2, Part 2, of the Act, setting conditions of

employment for employees. An enterpri se agreement may be made between the employer or

employers of the employees for whom it is made and one or more industrial organisations

representing any of those employees, although an industri al organisation may represent only

employees who are, or are eligible to be, members of the organisation. An enterprise

agreement may be made between the employer and its employees , although an industrial

organisation that represents any of the employees covered by the enterprise agreement may

become a party to that agreement if requested by a member employee.347

58 An enterprise agreement does not have any effect unless it is approved by the Commission. 348 A Full Bench of the Commission is required to set principles to be followed by the Commission

in determining whether to approve enterprise agreements 349 The Commission must approve

an enterprise agreement if it is satisfied that the ag reement complies with all relevant statutory

req uirements:

2 88 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• that it does not, on balance, provide a net detriment to the employees when compared

with the aggregate package of conditions of employment under any State awards covering those employees;

• that th e employees are not disadvantaged compared to their entitlements under any Federal awards covering those employees;

• that the ag reement does not, on balance, provide a net detriment to the employees when

compared with the aggregate package of conditions of employment under a State or

Federal award that covers employees performing sim ilar work to that performed by the

employees covered by the agreement in circumstances where the employees are not covered by any State or Federal award;

• the parties understand the agreement; and

• the parties do not enter the agreement under duress 350

59 In common with the award provisions of the Act, an enterprise agreement is not to be

approved unless it contains dispute resolution procedures, or the Commission is satisfied that

another relevant agreement or award already does so . Dispute resolution procedures may (but

need not) be included in an enterprise agreement if the em ployer has fewer than 20 employees 351

60 Subject to the terms of an enterprise agreement:

The provisions of an enterprise agreement prevail over the provisions of any State award

of the Commission that deal with the same matters in so far as the provisions of the Sta te award apply to a person bound by the enterprise agreement. 352

Queensland

61 Chapter 5 of the Industrial Relations Act 1999 (Old) provides for the making of award s. The

Queensland Industrial Relations Commission is empowered under Part 2 of Ch apter 5 to make

awards. Section 125(1) of the Industrial Relations Act (1999) (Old) empowers the Commission

to 'make , amend or repeal an award to provide, among other things, fair and just employment

conditions' . An award may operate retrospectively353 The Commission must ensure an award,

among other things, provides for secure, relevant and consistent wages and employment

conditions; provides fair standards for employees in the context of living standards generally

prevailing in the community; and is su ited to the efficient performance of work according to the

needs of part icular enterprises , industrie s or workplaces 354 The Commission must ensure that

an award contains a dispute resolution procedure. The form of the procedure is to be agreed

on by the parties to the award . If the parties cannot agree, the Commission must insert an

appropriate procedure in the award . The procedure must include procedures fo r consultation

at the workplace, the involvement of relevant organisation s and any other procedure

prescribed under a regulation. 355

62 In contrast to a Commonwealth award, an award made under the Industrial Relations Act 1999

(Old) 'takes effect and has the force of law throughout the State and without limit of time,

except as otherwise prescribed by [s123(2)]' 356 Accordingly, awards under the Queensland

Act are common rule awards, unless otherwise pre scribed. Subsection 123(2) allows an award

National Perspective Part 1 289

to state the period, location and employer it covers . In contrast to the Commonwealth award

system, awards can operate at large and their making is not conditional upon any precondition ,

for example, the existence of an industrial dispute.

63 Th e Commission may review an award of its own initiative or on the application of a party to the

award. Reviews must be conducted at least every three years 357

64 To the extent of any inconsistency, an award prevails over a contract of service that is in force

when the award becomes enforceable, or is made while the award continues in force . An

inconsistency does not arise simply because the contract provides for employment conditions

more favourable to the employee than the award .358 By contrast, while a certified agreement operates, it prevails to the extent of any inconsistency over an award. 359

65 Chapter 6, Part 1 of the Industrial Rela tions Act 1999 (Old} provides for certified ag reements.

Part 1, Division 1 deals with makin g the agreements. Division 2 deals with the certifying of the

agreements.

66 Section 142 enables a certified agreement to be made between an employer and its

employees or between an employer and one or more employee organisations. The employee

organisation must represent, or be entitled to represent, any employees of the employer. When

one of those persons or bodies proposes to make a certified agreement, the proposer must

advise the other parties in writing of the proposer's intention to begin negotiations for the

agreement. 360 Industrial action cannot be taken until seven days after the expiry of the existing

agreement and 21 days after the notice to beg in negotiations was given 361 During this period ,

the parties cannot ask the Commission to help to make the agreement.

67 After this period (described in the Act as the 'peace obligation period') has ended , the

Commission may exercise conciliation powers where a party has declared a breakdown in

negotiations or the Commission becomes aware that a negotiating party is engaging in

industrial action 362 Where conciliation has been unsuccessful, the Commission can exercise

arbitration powers to make a certified agreement. 363 Under s149(4) a full bench of the

Commission may establish principles about the arbitration of certified agreements. Unless all

the negotiating parties agree, the Commission as constituted for the conciliation cannot

exercise the arbitration powers provided under s149.

68 Chapter 6, Part 1, Division 2 of the Act deals with the certification of the ag reements.

Section 156 provides that the Commission must certify the agreement if, and must not certify

the agreement unless, it is satisfied of the various matters set out in s156(1 )(a) to (k). These

paragraphs requi re:

• that the terms of the agreement were explained in a way that was appropriate, having

regard to the persons' particular circumstances and needs;

• the agreement was freely made;

• it is in writing and signed by or for all the parties;

• it includes procedures for preventing and settli ng disputes;

290 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

• it specifies a nominal expiry date (for a project agreement- the date must be no later than

the date on which the project ends and for another agreement - a date no later than

three years after the date on which the agreement will come into operation);

• a valid majority of the relevant employees approved it; and

• it passes the 'no disadvantage' test.

69 Section 156U)(i) provides that for an agreement to be made with an employee organisation,

other than an agreement for a new business, each employee organisation that is bound by the

award or industrial agreement that binds the employer, or would bind the employer apart from

an award under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) , is a party to the agreement.

South Australia

70 The South Australian Industrial Relations Commission is empowered to approve enterprise agreements and to make awards under Chapter 3, Parts 2 and 3, respectively, of the Industrial

and Employee Relations Act 1994 (SA).

71 The objects of Part 2 pertaining to enterprise ag reements, set out in s73, are-

(a) to encourage and facilitate the making of agreements governing remuneration,

conditions of employment and other industrial matters at the enterprise or workplace level; and

(b) to provide a framework for fair and effective negotiation and bargaining between

employers and employees with a view to the making of such agreements and to

provide for the participation of associations in the process of negotiation and

barg81ning; and

(c) to ensure that award remuneration and conditions of employment operate as a

safety net underpinning the negotiated agreements at the enterprise or workplace

level; and

(d) to provide for improved flexibility in conditions of employment at the enterprise and

workplace level with consequence increases in efficiency and productivity

72 Sections 7 4 to 77 describe detailed requirements governing an enterprise agreement. Those

conditions include:

• a requirement that an enterprise agreement be made at the single business level;

• conditional capacity for an employee association to represent the employees employed

with that single business;

• a negotiation period accompanying the proposed enterprise agreement;

• a requirement that the proposed enterprise agreement 'include procedures for preventing

and settling industrial disputes between the employer and employees bound by the

agreement'; and

• if a majority of at least two thirds of the employees covered by the proposed agreement

agree, the agreement may include a provision giving an association of employees that is

National Perspective Part 1 291

able to represent the industrial interests of the employees' rights to represent those

employees to the exclusion of other associations of employees.

73 An enterprise agreement cannot be enforced unless it is approved by the Commission. 364

Section 79 prescribes conditions for approving an enterprise agreement, and requires the

Commission to approve an enterprise agreement if those conditions are met. The Commission must be satisfied that:

• before the app li cation for approval was mad e, reasonable steps were taken to explain the

terms and effect of the agreement to the employees who were to be covered by it,

including explaining the procedures fo r preventing and settling industrial disputes; 365

• the agreement has been negotiated without coercion and a majority of the employees

covered by the agreement have genuinely agreed to be bound by it;366 and

• if the agreement is entered into by an association as representative of the group of employees bound by th e agreement - an appropriate officer of the association has

lodged a statutory declaration with the Commission verifying that a majority of the

employees currently constituting the group have authorised the association to act on

their behalf.3 67 In this regard , s75(3) provides that a member of an association is taken to

have given the association an authorisation to enter into an enterprise agreement on

behalf of that employee for as long as the member remain s a member of the association

unless the member w ithdraws that authorisation .

7 4 Chapter 3, Part 3 deals wi th awards. The Commission is empowered under s90 of the Act to make an award about remuneration and other industrial matters. If there is an inconsistency

between an award and an enterprise agreement, the agreement prevails to the extent of the

inconsistency. 368 Th e Commission may refrain from hearing or determining an application for

an award bin ding only one employer or two or more employers who together carry on a single

business where the Commiss ion considers that the parties should try to negotiate an

enterprise agreement and is not satisfied that there is no reasonable prospect of the parties doing so .369

75 In making an award, the Commission is not restricted to the specific relief claimed, but may

include provisions wh ich the Commission considers necessary or appropriate 370 Before the

Commission makes an award, it must take reasonable steps to ensure that all persons who are

to be bound by it have been given a reasonable opportunity to appear and to be heard. 371

76 An award prevails over a contract of employment to the extent that the award is more beneficial

to the employee than the contract. 372

Western Australia

77 Th e Western Australian Industrial Relat ion s Commission is empowered under Part II, Divisions

2A and 28 respectively, of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) to make award s and to

register industrial agreements.

78 Part II , Division 2 of th e Act sets out the general jurisdiction and powers of the Commission.

Section 29 provides for the referral to the Commission of industrial matters. Th e decision of the

Commission 'shall be in the form of an award, order, or declaration and shall in every case be

292 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

signed and delivered by the Commissioner constituting the Commission that heard the matter

to which the decision relates or, in the case of a decision of the Commission in Court Session,

shall be signed and delivered by the Senior Commissioner among the Commissioners

constituting the Commission in Court Session ' 373

79 Division 2A of Part II of the Act makes specific provisions regarding awards. Section 36A(1)

provides that in any proceedings in which the Commission is considering making an award,

defined as the new award, that extends to employees to whom no award currently extend s, th e

onus is on any party opposing the making of the new award to show that it would not be in the publ ic interest. The Commission may make an interim award extending to employees pending the making of such a new award 3 74

80 Section 37(1) provides :

An award has effect according to its terms, but unless and to the extent that those terms

expressly provide otherwise it shall, subject to this section -(a) extend to and bind -

and

(i) all employees employed in any calling mentioned in the Industry or industries

to which the award applies; and

(ii) all employers employing those employees;

(b) operate throughout the State, [subject to certain exceptions].

81 Section 40 empowers the Commission to vary or cancel an award . The Commission is

empowered under s40B of its own motion to vary an award for any one or more of several

specified purposes including 'to ensure that the award is consistent with the facilitation of the

efficient organisation and performance of work according to the needs of an industry and

enterprises within it, balanced with fairness to the employees in the industry and enterprises . '375

82 Specific provisions regarding industrial agreements are contained in Part II, Division 2D of the

Act. Section 41 (1) provides that '[a]n agreement with respect to any industrial matter or for the

prevention or resolution under this Act of disputes, disagreements, or questions relating thereto

may be made between an org an isation or association of employees and any employer or

organization or association of employers. '

83 Bargaining for an industrial agreement may be initiated under and in accordance with s42(1) by

an organisation or association of employees or employers, or an employer. Section 428(1)

provides that when bargaini ng for an industrial agreement, a party to the negotiation shall

bargain in good faith . In order to assist parties to bargain for an industrial agreement, s42 E(1)

provides the Commission may exercise its powers as if it were endeavouring to resolve and

industrial matter. Where the Commission has declared that bargaining has ended between

negotiating parties, s421 provides that the Commission may, on application , make an

'enterprise order'. An enterprise order may also be made, on application, in other

circumstances. Section 43( 1) provides that an industrial agreement may be varied, renewed or

cancelled by the agreement of all the parties to the agreement. The Commission may vary an

National Perspective Part 1 293

industrial agreement pursuant to s43(2) for the purpose of including, omitting or varying a

provision that authorises an employer to stand-down an employee.

Tasmania

84 The Tasmanian Industrial Commission is empowered under Part II, Division 3 of the Industrial

Relations Act 1984 (Tas.) to make or vary an award. Part Ill of the Act deals with the subject

matter of awards, as do regulations 11-14 of the Industrial Relations Regulations 1993 (Tas.).

85 Section 41 provides:

(1) Where it is agreed by the parties concerned, there may be formulated, in relation to

any project, undertaking, establishment, or workplace, a procedure to be followed with a view to settlement, without strike action or other industrial action, of any

grievance or dispute that arises between any 2 or more of the parties.

(2) A procedure referred to in subsection (1) is in this section referred to as a grievance

or dispute settling procedure.

(3) A grievance or dispute settling procedure shall be set out in an agreement made in

writing between the parties.

(4) The parties to a grievance or dispute settling agreement shall be the organization or

organizations representing the employees concerned and the employer or an

organization of employers concerned.

(5) The Commission may encourage the parties to an award or industrial agreement or

any of them to enter into consultation with a view to formulating a grievance or

dispute settling procedure in relation to any project, undertaking, establishment or

workplace.

(6) With the consent of the parties to an award or an industrial agreement, a grievance

or dispute settling procedure may be inserted in that award or, as the case may be,

that industrial agreement.

86 The Act distinguishes between industrial agreements, made under Part IV of the Act, and

enterprise agreements, made under Part IVA of the Act.

87 An industrial agreement may ba entered into by an employee organisation with an employer

organisation, or any employer or group of employers, with respect to an industrial matter. The

Tasman ian Industrial Commission is empowered to conduct a hearing into an application for an

industrial agreement, and to approve the agreement. If all parties to an industrial agreement

agree to enter into an enterprise agreement, they may, by mutual consent, retire from that

industrial agreement which thereupon ceases to have effect. 376

88 Enterprise agreements regulate the conditions of employment for any or all of the people

employed in an enterprise. 'Enterprise' is defined as: any business, undertaking or project or

part of any business, undertaking or project; any combination of businesses, undertakings or

projects or parts thereof; any service provided by (generally speaking) a government

department or state authority; or any combination of services provided by government departments or state authorities. 377

294 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

89 The Commission is empowered under ss61 1 and 61 J to approve an enterprise agreement, and

must approve it unless satisfied that various preconditions set out in s61 J of the Act have not been met.

Conciliation

New South Wales

90 Section 3(g) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) provides that one of the objects of the

Act is:

To provide for the resolution of industrial disputes by conciliation and, if necessary, by

arbitration in a prompt and fair manner and with a minimum of legal technicality

91 The conciliation powers of the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales, are

provided in Chapter 3, Part I, of the Act, dealing with industrial disputes.

92 As noted, ss14 and 39 of the Act require the inclusion of dispute resolution procedures in

awards and enterprise agreements. Consistent with that requirement, s131 of the Act enables the Commission to:

refuse to deal with an industrial dispute until it is satisfied that any relevant dispute resolution procedures in an industrial instrument [defined to include an award and

enterprise agreement] have been followed as far as it reasonably practicable in the

circumstances.

93 Where the Commission deals with an industrial dispute, s132(1) provides that:

For the purpose of resolving an industrial dispute, the Commission may convene a

compulsory conference and require the attendance of any person whose presence the

Commission considers would help in the resolution of the dispute.

94 Section 133 provides that the 'Commission must first attempt to resolve an industrial dispute

by conci liation. '

95 Section 134(1) requires the Commission , when attempting the conciliation of an industrial

dispute, to do everything that seems to be proper to assist the parties to agree on terms for the

resolution of the dispute.

96 The Commission may, during conciliation proceedings:

make a recommendation or give a direction to the parties to the industrial dispute. Failure

to comply with any such recommendation or direction may not be penalised, but may be

taken into account by the Commission in exercising its functions under the Act. 378

97 Section 134(4) requires the Commission, when dealing with an industrial dispute, to consider

whether the parties have bargained in good faith and in particular, whether they have attended

meetings that they have agreed to attend, complied with negotiating procedures and disclosed

relevant information for the pu rposes of negotiation. The Commission may make

recommendations or give directions to the parties to bargain in good faith .

98 Section 135(1) provides:

National Perspective Part 1 295

The Commission is to deal with an industrial dispute by arbitration only if it is not resolved

by conciliation.

99 Section 135 provides :

(2) Arbitration by the Commission is not to proceed until the Commission has issued a

certificate that reasonable attempts have been made to resolve the industrial

dispute by conciliation (certificate of attempted conciliation).

(3)

(4) When determining whether to issue a certificate of attempted conciliation, the

Commission must consider the effect that any industnal action in connection with

the industrial dispute is having on the parties and the public generally. In particular,

the Commission must give urgent consideration to the effect of industrial action in

connection with a demarcation dispute

(5)

(6) The Commission must, without delay, issue a certificate of attempted conciliation

[on the application of any person authorised to notify the Commission of an

industrial dispute} if the person satisfies the Commission that there is no reasonable

likelihood that the dispute will be resolved by conciliation.

(7) The Commission must, without delay, issue a certificate of attempted conciliation if

the Commission decides that industrial action or duress necessitates the exercise

of its arbitral powers.

(B)

(9) Nothing 1n this Act prevents the exercise of conciliation powers mearly because

arbitration powers have been exercised under the Act.

100 Chapter 3, Part 3 of the Act contains a counterpart of s116A of the Workplace Relations Act

1996 (C'wth) . In particular, s141 provides that, subject to certai n exceptions listed in s140(2):

(1) A person may not bring or continue an action in tort to which this Part applies while

the industnal dispute to which the action relates is subject to conciliation by the

Commission.

(2) ... an industrial dispute is subject to conciliation if:

(a) the Commission has been notified under [Chapter 3] of the dispute or has

decided on its own initiative to resolve the dispute, and

(b) a certificate of attempted conciliation has not been issued by the

Commission under [Chapter 3] in respect of the dispute.

101 Further, s142 provides that 'an injunction cannot be granted by any court to restrain a

threatened or apprehended tort, or to restrain the contin uation or repetition of a tort, if at that time the tort is not actionable under th is Part. '

296 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Queensland

102 The functions of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission are stated, in s273(1 )(e) of

the Industrial Relations Act (1 999) (Old), to include 'resolving disputes by conciliation of

industrial matters and, if necessary, by arbitration or making an order'.

103 This emphasis on conciliation is reflected in Chapter 7 of the Act, which deals with industrial

disputes. Section 229 provides that if an industrial dispute exists between an employer

organisation or an employer and an employee organ isation or an employee and remains

unresolved after the parties have genuinely attempted to settle it, each party to the dispute

must imm ediately notify the registrar of the dispute.

104 Chapter 7, Part 2 deals with the actions that the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission

may take for settling industrial disputes. Where a notice is given under s229, s230 provides:

(3) The Commission may take the steps it considers appropriate for the prevention or

prompt settlement of the dispute, by -(a) conciliation in the first instance; and

(b) if the commission considers conciliation has failed and the parties are unlikely

to resolve the dispute - arbitration.

Without limiting subsection (3), the commission may-(a) direct the industrial action to stop or not happen, or

(b) make orders, or give directions of an interjocutory nature; or

(c) exercise the commission's powers under s277 [which empowers the

Commission to grant injunctions] (whether or not application under that

section has been made) to grant an interim injunction; or

(d) make another order or exercise another power the commission considers

appropriate for the prevention of prompt settlement of the dispute.

105 Section 231 empowers the Commission to act as a mediator in an industrial cause, which it

includes an industrial dispute, whether or not it is within the jurisdi ction of the Commission, on the request of the parties directly involved in the cause, or if the Commissioner is satisfied

mediation is desirable in the public interest.

1 06 Section 232 empowers the Commission to hold a compulsory conference to prevent or settle

the industrial dispute. It may require a person to attend, even if the person is not directly

involved in the dispute, if the Commission considers the person's presence would be

conducive to the prevention or prompt settlement of the dispute.

107 The Commission's conciliation powers are given some rigor by ss233 and 234 of the Act.

Section 233 empowers the Commission to 'direct an order' about an industrial dispute to an

organisation, or a person in a capacity as an officer or agent of an organisation, or to any other

person. Where such an order is made, a person or persons (as named) must file an affidavit

with the Registrar of the Commission stating wheth er there has been compli ance with the order

and, if the order has not been complied with, the steps the person is aware of that have been

taken to comply. The Reg istrar must examine the affidavits and decide whether there has been

National Perspective Part 1 297

substantial compliance with the order. If the Reg istrar is not so satisfied, the Registrar must

issue a notice under the ru les of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission 'calling on

the organisation or person to whom the order was directed, to show cause to the full bench [of the Commission] at a stated time, why the organisation or person should not be dealt with under section 234' 379

108 Section 234(1) then provides that, if an organisation issued with the notice under s233(7) 'does

not show cause at the stated time', the Full Bench may take action including the imposition of

a financial penalty an amendment of an award or certified agreement to which the organisation is a party suspension of the date of operation of a wage increase, a change to the

organisation's rules to exclude from eligibility for membership persons belonging to a particular

class or section of the membership, suspension of the organisation's registration for a stated period, deregistration of the organisation , such orders as the Full Bench considers appropriate

to secure the organisation 's compli ance with the original order, such orders that the Fu ll Bench

considers appropriate to punish the organisation for not complying with the Commission 's

order, and/or costs of the 'show cause' proceedings.

1 09 Section 234(2) deals with the situation where a person issued with a notice under s233(7) does

not show cause as to why the person has not complied with the order. The possible action

includes a fine , costs and such other orders as the Full Ben ch considers appropriate to secure

the person's compliance with the Commission's order and/or to punish the person for not

complying with the Commission 's order.

South Australia

11 0 Section 192 of the Industrial and Employee Relations Act 1994 (SA) provides:

In exercising its jurisdiction, the Commission must make every practicable attempt to

conciliate, to prevent impending industrial disputes and to settle existing disputes and

claims by amicable agreement.

111 The Commission can mediate between the parties to an industrial dispute for the purpose of

resolving the dispute.380 It may mediate between people who may become involved in an

industrial dispute for the purpose of preventing an in dustrial dispute.

112 The Presiden t of the Commission may assign a Commissioner, for up to one year to deal with the prevention and resolution of industrial disputes of a class specified in the instrument of

assignment. 381

113 Sections 200 and 201, respectively, provide for voluntary and compulsory conferences called

by the Commission. In the case of a compulsory conference, the Commission may summon

the parties to the dispute and any other person who may be able to assist in resolving the

dispute to appear at the conference. 382 A compulsory conference may, at the discretion of the Commission, be held in public or private or partly in public and partly in private. 383 A party or

intervener may be legally represented by leave of the person presiding at the conference

subject to certain circumstances. 384

114 Section 205 provides:

298 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

The President of the Commission may at any time, and must at least once in each year,

convene a conference of all members of the Commission to discuss means of-(a) preventing, and ensuring the fair and expeditious resolution of, industrial

disputes; and

(b) ensuring that determinations made in settlement of industrial disputes are

consistent with the objects of this Act.

Western Australia

115 The pri ncipal objects of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) include, in s6:

(b) to encourage, and provide means for, conciliation with a view to amicable

agreement, thereby preventing and settling industrial disputes;

116 Section 32 of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) provides:

(1) Where an industrial matter has been referred to the Commission the Commission

shall, unless it is satisfied that the resolution of the matter would not be assisted by

so do1ng, endeavour to resolve the matter by conciliation.

(2) In endeavouring to resolve an industrial matter by conciliation the Commission shall

do all such things as appear to it to be right and proper to assist the parties to

reach an agreement on terms for the resolution of the matter.

(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2) the Commission may; for the

purposes of that subsection -(a) arrange conferences of the parties or their representatives presided over by

the Commission;

(b) arrange for the parties or their representatives to confer among themselves at

a conference at which the Commission is not present.

(6) Where the Commission does not endeavour to resolve a matter by conciliation or,

having endeavoured to do so -(a) is satisfied that further resort to conciliation would be unavailing; or

(b) is requested by all the parties to the proceedings to decide the matter by

arbitration,

the Commission may decide the matter by arbitration.

(7) Where a matter is decided by arbitration the Commission shall endeavour to

ensure that the matter is resolved on terms that could reasonably have been

agreed between the parties in the first instance or by conciliation.

(8) For the purposes of this section the Commission may -

(a) give such directions and make such orders as will in the opinion of the

Commission -

National Perspective Part 1 299

(!) prevent the deterioration of industrial relations in respect of the matter

until conciliation or arbitration has resolved the matter;

(ii) enable conciliation or arbitration to resolve the matter; or

(iiO encourage the parties to exchange or divulge attitudes or information

which in the opinion of the Commission would assist 1n the resolution of

the matter;

(b) give any direction or make any order or declaration which the Commission is

otherwise authorised to give or make under this Act.

II 7 Section 32A provides:

Tasmania

(1) The functions of the Commission under this Act as to the resolution of matters by

conciliation ("conciliation functions") and the determination of matters by arbitration

("arbitration functions'') -

(a) are to and may be performed at any time and from time to tline as and when

their performance is necessary or expedient; and

(b) are not limited by any other provision of this Act.

(2) Without limiting subsection (1 ), nothing in this Act prevents the performance of

conciliation functions merely because arbitration functions are being or have been

performed.

118 The Tasmanian Industrial Commission is given power to conduct hearings for settling industrial

disputes under sl9 of the Industrial Relations Act 1984 (Tas), which provides:

(1) Subject to this Act, the Commission has jurisdiction to hear and determine any

matter arising from, or relating to, an industrial matter.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1 ), the Commission may-

(c) conduct hearings for settling industrial disputes.

119 Section 20 addresses the exercise of the Commission's jurisdiction, and provides:

(1) In the exercise of its jurisdiction under this Act, the Commission -

(a) shall act according to equity, good conscience, and the merits of the case

without regards to technicalities or legal forms;

(b) shall do such things as appear to it to be right and proper for effecting

conciliation between parties, for preventing and settling industrial disputes,

and for settling claims by agreement between parties;

(c) is not bound by any rules of evidence, but may inform itself on any matter 1n

such a way as it thinks just; and

(d) shall have regard to the public interest.

300 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Arbitration

New South Wales

120 Section 3(g) of the objects of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) is

To provide for the resolution of industrial disputes by conciliation and, if necessary, by

arbitration in a prompt and fair manner and with a minimum of legal technicality

121 Consistently with that object, the Commission is to deal with an industrial dispute by arbitration

only if it is not resolved by conciliation, and arbitration is not to proceed until the Commission

has issued a certificate to the effect that reasonab le attempts have been made to resolve the

dispute by conciliation .385 The certificate may be issued on the Commission's own initiative or on application by any person authorised to notify the Commission of the industrial dispute. The

Commission must issue the certi fi cate without delay on the application of any person, if the

person satisfies the Commission that there is no reasonable likelihood that the dispute will be

resolved by conciliation, or if the Commission decides that industrial action or duress

necessitates the exercise of its arbitral powers. 386

122 Section 136 empowers the Commission, in arbitration proceedings, to: make a

recommendation or give a direction to the parties to the industrial dispute; make or vary an

award; make a 'dispute order' (as discussed below); or make any other kind of order it is

authorised to make (including an order made on an interim basis).

123 Pursuant to s137 of the Act, the Commission may make the following kinds of 'dispute orders'

when dealing with an industrial dispute in arbitration proceedings:

(a) an order that a person cease or refrain from industrial action;

(b) an order that an employer reinstate or re-employ any one or more employees who are

dismissed in the course of the industrial dispute or whose dismissal resu lted in the

industrial dispute;

(c) an order that an employer not dismiss employees in the course of the industrial dispute if

the employer has threatened to do so;

(d) an order that a person cease a secondary boycott imposed in connection with the

industrial dispute;

(e) if employees are taking industrial action in connection with an industrial dispute, an order

that the employees cease taking that industrial action before it makes any other kind of

dispute order against the employer.

124 However, a dispute order 'may not provide for the payment of compensation, lost remuneration or any other amount' 387

125 Section 139 of the Act all ows a person who applied for the dispute order, or any other person

who is authorised to apply for the dispute order, to apply to the Commission in relation to an

alleged contravention of that order. Before dealing with an alleged contravention, the

Commission must summon the person alleged to have contravened the order to show cause

why the Commission should not take action for the contravention. After hearing from any

National Perspective Part 1 301

person in answer to the summons, and after considering any other relevan t matter, the

Commission is empowered to do any one or more of the following:

(a) dismiss the matter;

(b) cancel the approval of an enterprise agreement;

(c) suspend or modify for any period all or any of the entitlements under an industrial

instrument;

(d) cancel or suspend the registration of an industrial organisation;

(e) make a demarcation order so as to exclude from eligibility from membership of an

industrial organisation persons belonging to a class or group in ci rc umstances where it

finds that the contravention has arisen because of the conduct of a particu lar group of

members of that industrial organisation;

(f) impose a financial penalty on an industrial organi sation or an employer as provided for

under s139(4) ; or

(g) make any other determination that the Commission considers would help in re solving the

industrial dispute.

126 Subsections 139(4) and (5) specify the penal ty that may be imposed, and the manner in wh ich

a penalty may be recovered .

Queensland

127 The functions of the Queensland Industrial Relations Com mi ssion include 'resolving industrial

disputes by conciliation , of industrial matters and , if necessary, by arbitration or making an

order' 3 88 The Commission can resolve disputes in the negotiation of agreements by

conci li ation or arbit ration 389 and disputes that threaten to harm th e community or the economy

by concil iation and, if necessary, arbitration 390

128 As noted, the Commission may arbitrate if it considers that conciliation has failed and the

parties are unlikely to resolve the dispute3 91 Sections 233 and 234 of the Act enable a Full

Ben ch of the Com mission to impose penalties on a person or organi sation against whom an

order is made, where the party or organisation has not complied with the order and is unable to

show cause why a penalty sho1Jid not be imposed .

South Australia

129 The Industrial Relations Commission of South Au stralia has jurisd iction, under sub-ss26(c) and

(d) of the Industrial and Employee Relations Act 1994 (SA), 'to resolve industrial disputes ' and

'to hear and determine any matter or thing arising from or relating to an industrial matter'. For

that purpose, the Commission has power to issue a su mmons requi ri ng a person to appear to

give evidence and to produce evidentiary material. 392 A person who fails to give evidence or produce evidentiary material commits a contempt. 393 The Commission has power to pu nish for

contempt. 394 Evidence may be taken on oath , affirmation or declaration. It may be taken orally

or in the form of a written deposition.395

302 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

130 Section 202 of the Act empowers a person presiding at a compulsory conference to refer the

subject matter of the conference for determination by the Commission (which may, where the

person presiding is a Presidential Member or a Commissioner, be constituted by him/herseln.

Orders may be made by the Commission, fol lowing referral of a matter for determination. 396

131 The Commission may impose a procedural liability or civil penalty or other penalties, if a party

contravenes or fails to comply with an interlocutory order of the Commission, or an order to do,

or refrain from, a particular act and makes no reasonab le and adequate excuse to the Commission for the contravention or non-compliance 397

132 Chapter 6 of the Act specifies various monetary fines to be imposed in the event that a person

fails to comply with a provision of the Act. For example, under s224 if a person who is bound

by an award or enterprise agreement contravenes or fails to comply with a provision of the

award or ag reement, the person is guilty of an offence pu nishable by a maximum penalty of

$2500. As noted, enterprise agreements must contain procedures for preventing or settling

further disputes. A person or body that fails to comply with those procedures also fails to

comply with the enterprise agreement. The Commission has no power to hear and determine

proceedings for an offence against the Act. Th at power is exercisable by an ind ustrial

magistrate. 398

Western Australia

133 The principal objects of the Industrial Relations Act 19 79 (WA) include, in s6:

(c) to provide means for preventing and settling industrial disputes not resolved by

amicable agreement, including threatened, impending and probable industrial

disputes, with the max1mum of expedition and the minimum of legal form and

technicality;

134 The arbitration powers of the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission are

contained in s32 of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA). If the Commission does not attempt

to resolve a matter by conciliation, or having attempted to do so 'is satisfied that further resort

to conci liation would be unavailing; or . is requested by al l parties to the proceedings to decide the matter by arbitration', the Commission may decide the matter by arbitration 399

Where a matter is decided by arbitration , 'the Commission shall endeavour to ensure that the

matter is reso lved on terms that could reasonably have been agreed between the parties in the

first instance or by conciliation' 400

135 Section 32A(2) provides that 'nothing in this Act prevents the performance of conciliation

functions merely because arbitration functions are being or have been performed' .

Tasmania

136 Section 29(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1984 (Tas.) enables an organisation, employer or

employee to apply for a hearing in respect of an industrial dispute. Section 29(3) empowers the

Commission, 'at any stage of proceedings ... of its own motion or at the request of one or

more of the parties to .. . attempt to conciliate the dispute'.

137 Section 31 (1) provides that:

National Perspective Part 1 303

Subject to this section, where the Commissioner presiding at a hearing under section 29

is of the opinion, after affording the parties at the hearing a reasonable opportunity to

make any relevant submissions and considering the views expressed at the hearing, that

anything should be required to be done, or that any action should be required to be

taken, for the purpose of preventing or settling the industrial dispute in respect of which

the hearing was convened, that Commissioner may, by order in writing, direct that that

thing is to be done or that action is to be taken.

138 The Commission has a power to conduct a private arbitration with the consent of all the

parties. Section 61, which gives that power, is:

(1) Where the President is of the opinion that it is desirable to do so for the purpose of

resolving an industrial matter concerning 2 or more parties, he [sic] may, at the

written request of all those parties, appoint a Commissioner to conduct an

arbitration in respect of that industrial matter, subject to the parties agreeing to

accept the Commissioner's decision on the arbitration is final.

(2) All proceedings relating to arbitration pursuant to this section shall be conducted in

private and any record of those proceedings shall be supplied by the Commission

only to the parties to that arbitration.

(3) In conducting an arbitration pursuant to this section, a Commissioner shall have

regard to the matters specified in section 20(1) and to any principles previously

determined by a Full Bench and which still have application.

(4) The decision of a Commissioner acting pursuant to this section shall not be applied

as an award or order of the Commission, but may be incorporated in, or form, an

agreement made pursuant to section 55(1).

139 The Industrial Relations Act 1984 (Tas.) provides penalties for breaches of the Act, or an award

or a registered agreement made under the Act. Proceedings for an offence against the Act, and

the imposition of any consequential penalty, must be heard and determined by a magistrate,

not the Commission 4 01

Injunctions

New South Wales

140 Section 137 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) sets out the kinds of dispute orders that

the Commission may make when dealing with an industrial dispute in arbitration proceedings.

They include a power to 'order a person to cease or refrain from taking industrial action' 402

Under s137(2), 'if employees are taking industrial action in connection with the industrial

dispute, the Commission may order the employees to cease taking that industrial action before

it makes any other kind of dispute order against the employer.'

141 Section 139 deals with contravention of a dispute order, including an injunctive order. Under

s139(2), the Commission is required to summon a person alleged to have contravened an

order to show cause why the Commission should not take action for the contravention.

Section 139(3) sets out the course of action open to the Commission after hearing any person

304 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

who is all eged to have contravened the dispute order. These kinds of actions are described above.

142 Additional injunctive powers are conferred on the Commission in Court Session by Chapter 7,

Part 1, of the Act, which deals wi th breach of industrial instruments. Such instruments include

certified agreements, and so the legislation covers the breach of the dispute resolution

procedures contained in certified agreements. Under s357(1 ), 'if an industrial court is sati sfied

that a person has contravened a provision of an industrial instrument, it may ord er the person

to pay a pecuniary penalty not exceeding $10,000 (a civil penalty)'. Under s359:

(1) The Commission in Court Session may, on the imposition of a civil penalty under

this Part by it or another industrial court, grant an injunction to restrain the person

from committing further or other contraventions of the industrial instrument concerned.

(2) Such an injunction may be granted on application or on the Commission's own

initiative.

(3) A person who disobeys such an injunction is guilty of contempt of the Commission

and may be dealt with accordingly

Queensland

143 The Queensland Industrial Rel ations Commission can, under s277(1) of the Industrial Relations

Act 1999 (Old), grant the injunctive order it considers appropriate to compel compliance with an industrial instrument, a permit or the Act; or to restrain a contravention, or continuance of a

contravention, of an industrial instrument, a permit or the Act. The Commission may direct the injunctive order to officers or members of an organ isation generally, particular offi cers or

members of an organisation, or a particular employer or employee.403 If the inj unctive order is

directed to an organisation, the organisation and each officer of the organisation must ensure that the officers and members of the organisation comply with the order4 04 Where a person or

organi sation agai nst whom an injunctive order is made fails to comply with that order, and is

unable to show cause why the person or organisation should not be dealt with under s234, the

Full Bench of the Commission may impose one or more of the penalties li sted under s234. This

is discussed further above.

144 The Commission has injunctive powers, under sub-ss230(3), (4) and (5) of the Act, in relation to

an ind ustrial dispute. Section 230(4), quoted above, empowers the Commission to grant an

interim injunction .

South Australia

145 The South Australian Industrial Relations Commission may make orders, in relation to industri al

disputes, under s202 of the Industrial and Employee Relations Act 1994 (SA) , referred to

above.

146 Injunctive remedies under the Act rest with the Industrial Court of South Australia. In particular,

s15 provides:

(1) The Court has jurisdiction to order a person who contravenes or fails to comply

with the provision of this Act, an award or an enterprise agreement-

National Perspective Part 1 305

(a) to take steps, specified in the order, within a time specified in the order, to

remedy the contravention or non-compliance; or

(b) to refrain from further contravention of, or non-compliance with, the

provision.

(2) If there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person is about to contravene or

to fail to comply with a provision of this Act, an award or enterprise agreement, the

Court has jurisdiction to order the person to refrBin from the contravention or non­

compliance.

Western A ustralia

14 7 The Industrial Relations Act 19 79 (WA) does not confer on the Western Australian Industrial

Commission a general express power to issue injun ctions. The Commission has power to

convene a compulsory conference under s44. At or in relation to such a conference the Commission may, with respect to 'industrial matters', 'give such direction and make such

orders as wil l in the opinion of the Commission . . . prevent the deterioration of industrial

relations in respect of the matter in question until conciliation or arbitration has resolved that matter' 405 In the case of a claim of harsh, oppressive or unfair dismissal of an employee the

Commission may make 'any interim order the Commission thinks appropriate in the

circumstances pending resolution of the claim ' 406 The Industrial Magistrate's Court has powe r, in limited circumstances, to make orders requiring a person to do or cease any specified

activity4 07 A person failing to comply with such an order of the Industrial Magistrate's Court is

taken to have committed a contempt of the Industrial Appeal Court 408

Tasmania

148 The Tasmanian Industrial Commission has jurisdiction, under s1 9(1) 'to hear and determine any

matter arising from, or rel ating to, an industrial matter'. For the purposes of s1 9(1 ), the

Commission may conduct hearings for settling industrial disputes. 409 Under s31 (1) it can direct,

by order in writing, 'that anything shou ld be required to be done, or that any action should be

requ ired to be taken, for the pu rpose of preventing or settling [an] industrial dispute in respect

of which [a] hearing was convened' . The Commission 's power under s31, would appear to

include a power to direct, by order in writing, that a person or a body cease described action,

or not take described action , 'fer the purpose of preventing or settling [an] industrial dispute'.

306 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

Attachment 5

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (C'wth) Extracts

National Perspective Part 1 30 7

308 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

4 Interpretation

(I) In th is Act, unless the contrary intention appears:

industrial action (except in Part XA) means:

(a) the performance of work in a manner different from that in which it is customarily

performed, or the adoption of a practice in relation to work, the result of which is a

restriction or limitation on, or a delay in, the performance of the work, where:

(i) the terms and conditions of the work are prescribed, wholly or partly, by an award

or an order of the Commission, by a certified agreement or AWA, by an award ,

determination or order made by another tribunal under a law of the Commonwealth

or otherwise by or under a law of the Commonwealth; or

(ii) the work is performed, or the practice is adopted, in connection with an industrial

dispute;

(b) a ban , limitation or restriction on the performance of work, or on acceptance of or offering

for work, in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed by an award or an

order of the Commission, by a certified agreement or AWA, by an award, determination

or order made by another tribunal under a law of the Commonwealth or otherwise by or

under a law of the Commonwealth;

(c) a ban, limitation or restriction on the performance of work, or on acceptance of or offering

for work, that is adopted in connection with an industrial dispute; or

(d) a failure or refusal by persons to attend for work or a failure or refusal to perform any work

at all by persons who attend for work, if;

(i) the persons are members of an organisation and the failure or refusal is in

accordance with a decision made, or direction given, by an organisation, the

committee of management of the organisation, or an officer or a group of members

of the organisation acting in that capacity; or

(ii) the failure or refusal is in connection with an industrial dispute; or

(iii) the persons are employed by the Commonwealth or a constitutional corporation;

or

(iv) the persons are employed in a Territory;

but does not include:

(e) action by employees that is authorised or agreed to by the employer of the employees; or

(f) action by an employer that is authorised or agreed to by or on behalf of employees of the

employer; or

(g) action by an employee if:

(i) the action was based on a reasonable concern by the employee about an

imminent risk to his or her health or safety; and

National Perspective Part 1 309

(ii) the employee did not unreasonably fail to comply with a direction of his or her

employer to perform other available work, whether at the same or another

workplace, that was safe and appropriate for the employee to perform.

127 Orders to stop or prevent industrial action

(1) If it appears to the Commission that industrial action is happening, or is threatened , impending

or probable, in relat ion to:

(a) an industri al dispute; or

(b) the negotiation or proposed negotiation of an agreement under Division 2 of Part VIB; or

(c) work that is regulated by an award or a certified agreement;

the Commission may, by order, give directions that the industrial action stop or not occur.

(2) The Commission may make such an order of its own motion, or on the application of:

(a) a party to the industrial dispute (if any); or

(b) a person who is directly affected, or who is likely to be directly affected, by the industrial

action; or

(c) an organisation of which a person referred to in paragraph (b) is a member.

(3) The Commission must hear and determine an application for an order under this section as

quickly as practicable.

(4) The powers conferred on the Commission by subsection (1) are in addition to, and not in

derogation of, the powers conferred on the Commission by the rest of this Act.

(5) A person or organisation to whom an order under subsection (1) is expressed to apply must

comply with the order.

(6) The Court may, on the application of a person or organisation affected by an order under

subsection (1) , grant an injunction on such terms as the Court considers appropriate if it is

satisfied that another person or organisation:

(a) has engaged in conduct that constitutes a contravention of subsection (5); or

(b) is proposing to engage in conduct that would constitute such a contravention .

(7) If, in the opinion of the Court it is desirable to do so, the Court may grant an interim injunction

pending determination of an application under subsection (6).

166A Restriction on certain actions in tort

(1) Subject to this section, an action in tort under the law of a State or Territory may not be brought

by a person against an organisation of employees , or an officer, member or employee of such an organisation, in relation to conduct by the organisation, or by the officer, member or

employee acting in that capacity, in contemplation or furtherance of claims that are the subject

of an industrial dispute unless the Commission:

(a) has certified in writing as mentioned in paragraph (6)(a) or (c) in respect of the conduct; or

31 0 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(b) has certified in writing as mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) in relation to the person in respect

of the conduct.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to:

(a) conduct that has resulted in:

(i) personal injury; or

(i i) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or

(iii) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property; or

(b) conduct arising out of a demarcation dispute; or

(c) conduct arising out of a dispute relating to a claim for payment to employees in respect

of a period during which the employees engaged, or engage, in industrial action; or

(d) conduct that is in breach of a direction given by the Commission or a State in dustrial

authority.

(3) A person who wants to bring an action in tort in respect of conduct to which subsection

(1 ) applies may give written notice to a member of the Commission or a Registrar stating that

the person wants to bring the action .

(4) If a notice under subsection (3) is given to a Registrar, he or she must tell a member of the

Commission as soon as practicable.

(5) If such a notice is given , the Commission must take immediate steps to try, or to continue to try,

by the exercise of its powers under this Act, to stop the cond uct.

(6) If:

(a) after the Commission starts to exercise conciliation powers in relation to the ind ustrial

dispute it forms the opinion that it is not likely to be able to stop the conduct promptly; or

(b) the Commission decides that it would cause substantial injustice to the person who gave

a notice under subsection (3) in respect of the conduct if the pers on were prevented from

bringing the action to which th e notice re lates while the Commission is exercising

conciliation powers in relation to the industrial dispute; or

(c) th e Commission has not stopped the conduct by the end of 72 hours after th e notice

was given under subsection (3) in respect of the conduct;

the Commission must immediately certify in writing to that effect.

(7) If:

(a) the conduct stops before the end of the 72 hours referred to in paragraph (6) (c); and

(b) after the conduct stopped, other conduct occurred; and

(c) in the Commission's opinion , the other conduct is substantially related to the first

mentioned conduct;

then, for the pu rposes of paragraph (6)(c):

Na tional Perspective Part 1 311

(d) the other conduct is taken to be part of the first mentioned conduct; and

(e) the period of the first mentioned conduct is taken to include the period of the other

conduct.

Part VIS-Certified agreements

Division 8 - Negotiations for certified agreements etc.

170ML Protected action

(1) Thi s section identifies certain action (protected action) to which the provisions in section 170MT

(which confers certain legal immu nity on protected action) are to apply.

(2) During the bargaining period:

(a) an organisation of employees that is a negotiating party; or

(b) a member of such an organisation who is employed by the employer; or

(c) an officer or employee of such an organisation acting in that capacity; or

(d) an employee who is a negotiating party;

is entitled , for th e purpose of:

(e) supporting or advancing claims made in respect of the proposed agreement; or

(D responding to a lockout by the employer of employees whose employment will be

subject to the agreement;

to organise or engage in in dustrial action directly against the employer and, if the organisation , member, officer or employee does so , the organising of, or engaging in , that industrial action is

protected action .

(3) Subject to subsection (6), during the bargaining period, the employer is entitled, for the

purpose of:

(a) support ing or advancing claims made by the employer in respect of the proposed

ag reement; or

(b) responding to industrial action by any of th e employees whose employment wi ll be

subject to th e agreement;

to lock out from their employment all or any of the employees whose employment will be

subject to the ag reement and, if the employer does so, the lockout is protected action.

Note 1: The existence of this entitlement does not affect any right of the employer to

refuse to pay the employee where, under the common law, the employer is permitted to

do so because the employee has not perform ed work as directed.

Note 2: The existence of this entitlement also does not affect any authorisation of the

employer to stand down the employee as a result of a variation of an award under section

126, nor does it affect the Commission's powers under that section to vary an award to give such an authorisati on .

31 2 Final Report of the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry

(4) The