Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Full Day's HansardDownload Full Day's Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Thursday, 29 November 1973
Page: 2363

Senator Little asked the Minister representing the Minister for Social Security, upon notice:

(1)   Does the Minister's statement, which appeared on page 3219 of the House of Representatives Hansard of 13 November 1973, that three out of four families, including those in which there is a working wife, would find the Government's proposed national health scheme cheaper than at present, take into account the extra taxation to be paid if the proposed rate of 1.35 percent is itself not deductible from personal income.

(2)   Will the Minister table, for the information of Senators, the documents upon which his statement was. based and the statistical information supplied to him by his advisers that prompted the conclusions referred to above.

Senator Douglas McClelland (NEW SOUTH WALES) - The answer to the honourable senator's question is as follows:

(1)   and (2) The Minister for Social Security refers the honourable senator to his reply to a very similar question by a Member of the House of Representatives, Mr Tom McVeigh, Member for Darling Downs, which was asked in the House on 22 November 1973- "Mr McVeigh- Will the Minister for Social Security table in the House all the information contained in the documents and calculations on which he bases his assertion that health insurance under his proposals will be cheaper for three out of four families and seven out often single persons?

Mr Hayden;Basically the information used for the purposes of that exercise comes from the Bureau of Census and Statistics publication 'Income Distribution 1968-69' which was published quite recently. It is a simple exercise to update those calculations. When I was in Opposition I received no help from the Government and did the hard work myself. I suggest that members of the Opposition ought to start doing a bit of work too."

Suggest corrections