Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Enhancing the Australia-Indonesia relationship through good actions as well as good reactions: speech to the Australia Indonesia Business Council, Sydney.



Download PDFDownload PDF

ROBERT MCCLELLAND MP SHADOW MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Speech to Australia Indonesia Business Council Sydney 15 March 2007

ENHANCING THE AUSTRALIA-INDONESIA RELATIONSHIP THROUGH

GOOD ACTIONS AS WELL AS GOOD REACTIONS

There has been a lot of discussion in the past week about the Australia-Indonesia relationship is being strengthened by how we deal with shared

tragedies. The sad events at Yogyakarta airport last week remain very much

in the public consciousness of both countries. But so to does the way in

which we responded.

Within hours of the accident Australia offered formal assistance through

medical and forensic experts and Indonesia accepted without the slightest

hesitation or concern. Indonesia lost 16 of its own citizens but President

Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono promptly penned a thoughtful letter to our

Prime Minister saying his people are forever grateful for the service and

friendship of the Australians who died and were injured in the accident.

Garuda Airlines provided the 737’s charred black box flight recorders to

Australian experts for download and the vital information was expedited back

to the Indonesian authorities to assist the investigation. All this is tangible

evidence of trust and practical cooperation.

There is no doubt relations between Canberra and Jakarta have been

strengthened because of the bombings in Bali, the 2005 Boxing Day Tsunami,

and the Sea King helicopter crash on Nias. It has also led to a strengthening

1

of relations between the citizens of both our countries - but here there is

perhaps some way to go.

Each of the above tragic events has prompted empathy, cooperation and a

steeled resolve to address future threats and challenges. In this light we can

be thankful for positive outcomes from very negative experiences.

But it is Labor’s firm view that the best way to build a relationship is not just by

focusing on how countries react to unforeseen events - as important as that

capacity clearly is - but rather how each can be proactive to act in our shared

interests.

Good diplomacy must focus on identifying the opportunities on our mutual

horizon and always discussing how together we can best grasp these

opportunities.

In the 2006 Lowy Institute Poll - Australia, Indonesia and the World, Australian

respondents thought that Indonesia benefited from having Australia as a

neighbour. Australians believed that as a nation we had shown ourselves to

be a reliable long-term friend to Indonesia. This may be the case, but as in

any relationship - its success should never be taken for granted. It must be

supported by forward thinking - consistently asking: how can our relations be

further improved?

New opportunities

One of the best opportunities for Australia-Indonesia relations lies in the field

of education. Enhancing the linkages of our education sector promises deep

social and economic rewards for both nations.

Indonesia’s proximity, its rich culture and climate have long attracted many

tourists from Australia - in 2005 nearly 400,000. Indonesian visitors to

Australia numbered some 81,000 last year. While there has been a steady

2

downward trend since 1998 (Indonesian visitors numbered 154,000 in 1996)

the Indonesian figure is projected to reach about 200,000 within the next

decade. This travel ensures both countries already have a decent sized class

of cross-culturally aware citizens.

The opportunity presented here is to develop tourism and business

interactions into exchanges and investment more genuinely focused on

education and deeper understanding.

Last year roughly 15,000 Indonesian students were enrolled in Australian

institutions - both secondary and tertiary. This ranks in the top 10 of

international student enrolments by nationality. But this figure of 15,000

actually represents a 6.7 percent drop from 2005 figures, which was itself an

11 percent drop on the previous year.

The reduction in numbers is partially due to Australian universities offering an

increasing number of off-shore programs in Indonesia - some 11 institutions

now do so. But if you take into account the 2006 Lowy Survey, the decline

may also be attributed to unresolved suspicions and negative public

perceptions of one other.

The Lowy Poll represented public feelings between Indonesia and Australia

via a thermometer. The poll determined that the Australian public’s feeling

towards Indonesia was a pretty lukewarm 50 degrees. In comparison

Malaysia at 58, United States 62, Papua New Guinea 63 and Great Britain 74.

Indonesian feelings towards Australia on the Lowy temperature gauge were

similarly lukewarm - only one degree warmer at 51.

In August last year Mr Ross Taylor, WA chairman of the Australia Indonesia

Business Council, pointed out that the number of Indonesian tourists coming

to Western Australia has more than halved in the past decade. Mr Taylor also

noted that the number of Indonesian students and people seeking medical

treatment had steadily declined. The reason he put forward for the decline

was speculated to be this lingering suspicion and negative attitude.

3

Singapore, Japan and Hong Kong are today actively promoting their

education sectors. So the message for Australia is either compete by dealing

with the underlying problem and reap the many inter-state economic and

social rewards or watch our competitors prevail. If we watch on like sheep

standing in a paddock we will loose out.

Labor believes far more effort can and should be put into building the

incentive for Indonesian students to study within Australia. To achieve this, a

more comprehensive program of public awareness about our neighbours

needs to occur within Australia. The main cultural enemy to confront here is

ignorance.

Within the Indonesian education system, English is being taught at an

increasingly early age - it is a core part of their curriculum. Looking within the

Australian education system, it becomes clear that young Australians are

entering a multi-lingual global economy without the competitive linguistic skills

required.

Dr George Quinn, the head of the South East Asia Centre at the ANU has

noted a national decline in the study of Indonesian. This he attributes to

factors including the Bali Bombings, the Shappelle Corby issue, and a general

anti-Islamic sentiment in Australia. Given that language study is naturally

accompanied by a familiarization with national culture, customs and history

the depletion of Australia’s Indonesia ‘knowledge bank’ is not just linguistic.

The inadequacy of knowledge was noted at an official level when, in 2005

ONA Director General Peter Varghese commented at a Senate Estimates

hearing that the agency was struggling to find enough Indonesian linguists to

fill established positions. Australia must address this ‘Ba’hasa deficit’ as a

priority of national security. It is not just an issue of sensible and progressive

secondary and tertiary educational curriculum.

4

The Indonesian demand for education is not limited to the University domain

and certainly not limited to Indonesians studying here in Australia. As the

Indonesian economy grows and labour market demands become more

sophisticated it is being matched by an increased demand for vocational skills

and training.

Expertise in information technology, clerical work, basic accounting and small

business management is what Indonesia increasingly needs and wants. This

presents Australian private enterprise in the vocational education and training

sector with a terrific investment opportunity which would also serve to further

develop the broader relationship between the two countries.

Continued Indonesian economic reform

Education is the sector of the economy that holds out enormous opportunity.

The benefits for both nations also extend far beyond the financial - continued

trade and investment across the economic board will only serve to strengthen

our ties.

Over the last two decades, trade between Australia and Indonesia has

continued to grow. This reflects liberalisation in both economies, as well as

substantial growth within the Indonesian economy itself. In 2005 total trade

between Australia and Indonesia was estimated at $7.25 billion. Indonesia

has progressively been strengthening Australian investor confidence by

gradually improving regulations between Jakarta and provincial governments.

This has occurred in order to obtain investment licences, and has increased

efforts towards an overall simplification of trade licensing procedures. Labor

fully endorses these efforts.

The Yudhoyono government is undoubtedly committed to making life easier

for business in Indonesia. But there are still a number of bureaucratic

obstacles to the pace of change. Concerns remain over corporate governance

issues, judicial reform, entrenched vested interests - as well as national

security. These all impede foreign investment. To sustain the growth pattern

5

of previous years, there is an ongoing need for Indonesia to reduce the

volatility of investment brought about by uncertainty.

International investors, including of course Australian business, will

unquestionably benefit from a successful implementation of a range of

Indonesian Government reform packages launched in July 2006. These

reforms are aimed at addressing issues such as infrastructure development,

financial market reform and the deepening of local debt capital markets.

Continuation of these programs is essential to the growth of both the

Indonesian economy, and level of foreign investment. Australian financial

experts have concluded that if President Yudhoyono can win the next election

in 2009 there will be an extended time frame for Indonesia to move forward

quite rapidly.

The volume of Australian investment in Indonesia at the beginning of 2005

was roughly $2.3 billion. In a January 2007 market analysis the ANZ bank

predicted that “with continued reform” Indonesia’s growth could easily reach 7

to 8 percent. This type of turbo charged growth would obviously receive huge

interest from Australian investors. ANZ noted in its analysis that “Indonesia is

one of only a few Asian countries where local debt markets are rapidly

expanding”.

Another area where Indonesia is beginning to implement important structural

reforms is in its mineral and mining sectors. The country’s mineral sector has

potential for much investment if significant regulatory reforms occur. Even

Indonesia’s Mining and Energy Ministry has reflected the market’s lingering

doubts with Mr Simon Sembiring, a director general at the Ministry, saying in

January this year in respect to the resources sector:

“It’s very difficult. Not only for people from overseas. Even local

people do not want to invest their money. There is no certainty.”

Fortunately, a new mining bill aimed at easing foreign investor licensing is

expected to pass the Indonesian Parliament in March this year. Resource

6

sector financial analysts have observed that the bill should reassure investors.

On 10 January this year Macquarie Bank analyst Adam Worthington said:

“We expect the bill, once passed, to provide greater legal certainty to

investors.”

Again there are benefits in reinforcing the opportunities of greater educational

links. The teaching expertise Australian universities have in the fields of

engineering, construction and architecture would be of enormous advantage

to Indonesia as the resource industry explores and exploits new projects.

There is an enormous infrastructure/construction knowledge base that

Australian universities can provide budding young Indonesian professionals in

these areas.

Indonesia’s extensive and valuable natural resources also need to be

sustainably managed. This is particularly the case for the Indonesian Forest

Industry. The Forestry Department of the UN Food and Agriculture

Organisation estimates that illegal logging accounts for 40 to 60 percent of the

total industrial round-wood supply in Indonesia. Illegal logs are often

smuggled to neighbouring countries without paying fees, contributions or tax.

When a business sector solidifies a corruption free reputation and when there

is a market economy relaxed and open to foreign investment enhanced

national security and stability tends to follow.

It is obviously in Australia’s national interest to encourage our businesses to

invest in Indonesia and encourage authorities in Jakarta to make investment

opportunities as attractive as possible.

So what else can Australia do?

Australia’s Response

Dialogues

7

Firstly, there is no doubt that Government can play a central role in actively

promoting business dialogues such as the Australia Indonesia Business

Council.

Secondly, the establishment of an Australia-Indonesia Leadership Dialogue -

perhaps using the successful Australia-US Leadership Dialogue as a template

- could be of significant mutual benefit to both government and business in

our countries. While setting up a Dialogue would probably be best led and

financed by the private sector, government - including the respective national

parliaments -can undoubtedly play an important facilitating role.

Trade

In terms of trade, the success of the Doha rounds is a key aspiration. But

Australia should - when hosting the APEC summit this year - take a leading

role in strengthening APEC. APEC may become a mechanism to achieve a

regional FTA.

Small business

Indonesia also presents a huge potential market for small-businesses. The

Indonesian government is undertaking a range of programs to assist this

including improving small to medium enterprise access to finance. The

finance sector and Australian businesses generally have the opportunity to

assist the development of small business

Indonesian small business craves technical assistance in computing and

communications. Australia has the skills for this market. Many US firms are

already active in this endeavour. Microsoft has donated over US$3 million

worth of software to Indonesian businesses, and is actively retraining many

ex-bank workers who were made redundant after the Asian financial crisis.

Legal expertise

Recent democratic reforms and the scale and complexity of the Indonesian

provincial political system have developed a substantial market for legal

expertise. Australian law firms can help deliver these skills, in particular legal

8

and statutory drafting skills are valuable as is broad expertise in dispute

resolution. A stable Indonesian archipelago is in Australia’s regional security

interests and our highly respected legal-system can contribute to

strengthening the counterpart institutions and courts in Indonesia.

Shared interest of regional stability

Political instability - particularly when accompanied by a break down of the

rule of law - undermines investor confidence, deters tourism, disrupts capital

flows, and weakens the existing institutions of government.

Terrorist groups like Jemaah Islamiah, militant Islamist schools and inter-state

criminal organisations therefore remain a threat not only to the safety of the

Indonesian and Australian people but also to the strength of our economic

relationship.

Counter terrorism

Australian and Indonesian counter-terror cooperation is on strong ground and

we should seek to enhance our capabilities wherever possible.

The Australian Federal Police currently support the Indonesian police force

through the Trans-national Crime Centre. Australian should continue to play a

support role in developing financial and legal measures to identify and

prosecute money launderers in Indonesia that fund terrorist groups like

Jemaah Islamiah. This includes assistance to Indonesia's Financial

Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre. The Jakarta Centre for Law

Enforcement Cooperation (JCLEC) was also established in 2004 as a bilateral

initiative.

The recently signed security agreement in November last year is clearly

aimed at deepening and expanding bilateral cooperation and exchanges as

well as intensifying cooperation and consultation between security and

defence agencies. This includes the continuation of joint-military and police

training.

9

The treaty is currently being examined by the Australian Parliament’s Joint

Standing Committee on Treaties and we look forward to seeing the

committee’s report.

Labor have already given in principle support to the Treaty. Labor sees the

Treaty as going some way to meeting Labor’s repeated call for the

implementation of a comprehensive regional counter terrorism strategy for

South East Asia.

We firmly believe a counter terrorism strategy should involve:

• An audit of our region’s counter terrorism capabilities;

• The implementation of coordinated strategies of prevention and

protection;

• An emergency response management framework (in the event that

terrorist attacks occur); and

• A ‘hearts and minds’ strategy to address the underlying political,

economic and societal factors which terrorist groups exploit to their

advantage.

Maritime security

Global shipping routes bottle-neck through the many parts of the Indonesian

archipelago. Australia like the rest of the world relies on the security of those

sea-lanes for flows of trade. Australia and Indonesia share the primary

responsibility of ensuring the maritime security of those straits is

comprehensive and strong. We also both have a vested interest in

addressing illegal arms and drug trafficking.

The AFP and Indonesian security forces work very closely on these matters

and opportunities to further develop this cooperation should be grasped in our

proposed in our regional counter-terrorism audit.

Failing states in the region

10

Recent events in East Timor and the Solomon Islands serve to remind us that

the time has now well and truly come for Australia to review our strategy for

dealing with failing states in our region.

In recent years we’ve seen a revolving door of military deployments to these

countries because the Australian Government has failed to take effective

measures to address the underlying social, economic and ethnic pressure that

produce civil unrest.

Labor believes that the stability and prosperity in our region requires a more

comprehensive and long-term approach than short-term ‘band-aid’ solutions

to violent flare-ups. Indonesia can play an important role in assisting Australia

address the ‘arc of instability’.

In that context Labor aims to establish of a Regional College of Governance

Administration and Security to assist in capacity building throughout the

region. We see Indonesia playing a valuable role in providing input to training

modules. Indonesian representatives would of course be welcome students at

the college.

Bird flu

The health of our citizens is central to national security of both Indonesia and

Australia so we must continue to be proactive about strengthening our bird flu

defences.

Australia has to date provided $15.5 million towards combating avian

influenza in Indonesia. This involves strengthening public awareness through

information sharing It also involves supporting improvements in disease

detection, diagnosis and containment. Australia and Indonesia need to ensure

that they are as prepared as possible for these events. There was recently

some disagreement over Australian access to flu-strain samples which are

crucial to the disease preparedness - this must be mitigated to ensure that

both Indonesia and Australia are able to effectively address this threat.

11

Equally Australia has not been as proactive as it could be in taking steps to

assist Indonesia develop an immunisation program. The threat of bird-flu has

the potential to rapidly defy borders, and warrants close attention from both

countries. It is essential that we co-operate in terms of vaccine sharing,

development and distribution.

Natural disasters

Finally, history shows that man-made and natural disasters are an unfortunate

reality in our region. Labor has proposed the establishment of a Regional

Disaster Management and Co-ordination Centre to better facilitate and plan

for a response to crises as they arise.

Conclusion

The political relationship between Australia and Indonesia is fundamentally in

good shape. The knowledge of this however, should not distract us from the

task of pursuing a more comprehensive and mutually beneficial relationship

Closer ties can be made by addressing many of the underlying causes of

negative social attitudes and public perceptions. The most effective way to

achieve this is by enhancing our educational relations - at all levels of society,

encompassing a broad range of skills and disciplines.

The enhancement of skills and the economic relationship is not only beneficial

to business, but it serves as an effective and valuable promoter of regional

stability and security.

A Rudd Labor Government will be focused on searching for opportunities to

further develop the relationship and continue to build on our positive

cooperative reactions - highlighted in times of crisis and tragedy.

[ends]

12