Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Witness K Timor-Leste spy trial must not be kept secret

Download PDFDownload PDF

Media Release Human Rights Law Centre | For immediate release: Wednesday 31 October 2018

Witness K Timor-Leste spy trial must not be kept secret

Tomorrow the ACT Magistrates Court will decide whether the trial of a former high ranking intelligence officer and his lawyer will be held in public or kept from scrutiny with a closed trial.

The former officer, known only as Witness K, and his lawyer Bernard Collaery were prosecuted earlier this year for their role revealing that the Australian Government had bugged the Timor-Leste cabinet room during sensitive negotiations about oil and gas revenue.

Hugh de Kretser, the Executive Director at the Human Rights Law Centre, said it is extremely important that the Government does not succeed in its attempts to hold the case in secret.

"In the current climate, with Parliament this year passing sweeping new laws criminalising the disclosure of information, transparency around this worrying case is vital," said Mr de Kretser.

Witness K did not take details of the controversial spying episode to the media, but instead lodged a protected complaint with the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security who subsequently directed him to lawyer Bernard Collaery for legal advice. In 2013, just before the matter was to be raised in arbitration proceedings at The Hague, the Australian Government raided Mr Collaery’s office in Canberra and seized Witness K’s passport which prevented him from giving evidence in the arbitration. The International Court of Justice subsequently ordered the Australian Government to stop interfering with Timor-Leste's communications.

"With this prosecution, the Government is trying to send a message to all public servants that if they dare to speak up about corruption or wrongdoing, the government will come down on them like a tonne of bricks. For a healthy democracy, we want people speaking up when they see something wrong," said Mr de Kretser.

"When someone exposes government wrongdoing they should be thanked, not prosecuted," said Mr de Kretser.

Witness K and Mr Collaery have been charged with breaching section 39 of the Intelligence Services Act. Charges under that section can only be laid by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions on the instruction or with the consent of the Attorney-General. The charges carry a potential two year jail term for the pair. The Government has subsequently increased the

penalty for future breaches to up to 10 years jail.

The news that Witness K and his lawyer, Bernard Collaery, had been charged, was revealed when independent MP Andrew Wilkie used Parliamentary privilege to detail the situation.

"That's what happens in a pre-police state, where instead of a royal commission they lock up people who more likely deserve the Order of Australia," said Mr Wilkie.

For interviews call: Michelle Bennett, Director of Communications, Human Rights Law Centre, 0419 100 519

Human Rights Law Centre

Level 17, 461 Bourke Street

Melbourne VIC 3000

ABN: 31 117 719 267

Preferences | Unsubscribe