Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Thursday, 31 July 1930

Senator McLACHLAN (South Australia) . - As sub-clause 5 of this clause is in direct conflict with the decision the committee has reached on clause 12, it will require readjustment at the hands of the draftsman. I think it better, however, to agree to it at this stage with a view to its recommittal later.

Senator SirHAL COLEBATCH (Western Australia) [9.41].- The real difficulty is created, not by the present bill!, but by the act itself, because it purports to take away the original jurisdiction of the High Court in the matter of prohibition, mandamus or injunction. It is a point that will have to be considered.

Suggest corrections