- Home
- Parliamentary Business
- Senators and Members
- News & Events
- About Parliament
- Visit Parliament
Permalink
Prev
Next
Return to results list (1 results)




Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Table Of Contents


Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- HIGH COURT BENCH
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- PAPER
- QUESTION
- QUARANTINE BILL
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- POST AND TELEGRAPH BILL
- SUGAR BOUNTY BILL
- COPYRIGHT BILL
- TASMANIA GRANT BILL
- REFERENDUM (CONSTITUTION ALTERATION) BILL
- QUESTION
- INVALID AND OLD-AGE PENSIONS APPROPRIATION BILL
- REFERENDUM (CONSTITUTION ALTERATION) BILL
- Adjournment
Content Window
Thursday, 24 October 1912
Senator McGREGOR (SOUTH AUSTRALIA) (Vice-President of the Executive Council)
- In answer to Senator Needham's question, I may state that I simply expressed a general opinion. It has been acknowledged that the work of the High Court is of such a character that, in the very near future, some alteration will be required. That was the opinion which I expressed. As to the AttorneyGeneral's expression of opinion in reply to newspaper criticism, I may say that his statement, also, was absolutely correct. Consequently, there is no conflict of opinion on the part of Ministers.
