Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document


The order of the day having been read for the resumption of the debate on the question—That the Bill be now read a second time—

Debate resumed by Mr Emerson who moved, as an amendment—That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "the House declines to give the Bill a second reading and condemns the Government for:

(1) seeking to weaken and remove, wherever possible, protection for working Australians against unfair dismissal;

(2) taking a confrontationist approach to workplace relations, aimed at provoking rather than averting industrial disputes; and

(3) tearing away at the safety net that has been erected over a century to protect vulnerable working Australians".

Debate continued.

Debate adjourned (Mr Ruddock—Attorney-General), and the resumption of the debate made an order of the day for a later hour this day.