Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document


The order of the day having been read for the resumption of the debate on the question—That the Bill be now read a second time—

Debate resumed.

Mr Tanner moved, as an amendment—That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House condemns this Government for its:

(1) reduction in the projected Budget cash surplus from $14.6 billion when the 2001-02 Budget year first appeared in the 1998-99 Budget Papers to a surplus of $1.5 billion and an accrual deficit of $0.8 billion in this Budget;

(2) failure to address the significant investment needs in the areas of education and health provision;

(3) string of policy backflips and wasteful, panic driven spending across almost all program areas;

(4) commitment to sell the rest of Telstra if re-elected;

(5) failure to provide relief for Australian families under financial pressure;

(6) failure to address the hardship, and red tape nightmare faced by small business arising from the introduction of the GST;

(7) deception of self-funded retirees and pensioners through misleading taxation claims;

(8) failure to provide a comprehensive retirement incomes policy which addresses the needs of the new century;

(9) lax approach to corporate governance issues which has contributed to the recent spate of corporate failures;

(10) lack of an ongoing commitment to the protection of employee entitlements;

(11) misuse of taxpayers' money on its politically partisan GST advertising campaign;

(12) provision of complex, confusing and uninformative budget documents;

(13) failure to identify in the Budget papers the true cost of GST collection and implementation; and

(14) failure to deliver its guarantee that no Australian will be worse off as a result of the GST package".

Debate continued.