

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Kakadu National Park
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
30-05-1996
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
NT
- Interjector
- Page
1449
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
- Question No.
- Questioner
Senator BOB COLLINS
- Responder
Senator Hill
- Speaker
- Stage
- Type
- Context
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1996-05-30/0143

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
PETITIONS
- Census
- Industrial Relations: Reform
- Logging and Woodchipping
- Forest Protection
- Higher Education Funding
- Pet Food
- Sale of Telstra
- How to Vote Cards
- Procedural Text
-
NOTICES OF MOTION
- Consideration of Legislation
- Regulations and Ordinances Committee
- Uranium Mining
- Snowy River
- Aussie's Coffee Shop
- Banking
- Port Lillias
- Budget Cuts
- Salinity
- Tully Millstream Project
- Logging and Woodchipping
- Drugs
- Land Clearing
- Higher Education Funding
- Commonwealth Ombudsman
- Daw Aung San Suu Kyi
- Water Pollution
- Greenhouse Gases
- Murray-Darling Basin
-
COMMITTEES
-
Selection of Bills Committee
- Report
-
Selection of Bills Committee
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- REPRESENTATION OF VICTORIA
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
-
COMMITTEES
-
Legal and Constitutional References Committee
- Reference
-
Legal and Constitutional References Committee
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- INDEXED LISTS OF FILES
-
COMMITTEES
-
Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- Report
-
Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- Report
-
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee
- Report
-
Community Affairs Legislation Committee
-
AIRPORTS BILL 1996 AIRPORTS (TRANSITIONAL) BILL 1996
- First Reading
- Second Reading
-
COMMITTEES
- Sales Tax Legislation Committee
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
-
NOTICES OF MOTION
- Native Title Committee
-
SUPPLY (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL 1996-97 SUPPLY BILL (No. 1) 1996-97 SUPPLY BILL (No. 2) 1996-97
- First Reading
- Second Reading
-
CUSTOMS TARIFF (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996 TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- First Reading
- Second Reading
-
CRIMES AMENDMENT (CONTROLLED OPERATIONS) BILL 1996
-
In Committee
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator BOLKUS
- Senator CHAMARETTE
- Senator VANSTONE
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator BOLKUS
- Senator VANSTONE
- Senator BOLKUS
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator VANSTONE
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator VANSTONE
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator BOLKUS
- Senator VANSTONE
- Senator BOLKUS
- Senator VANSTONE
- Senator SPINDLER
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- EDUCATION AND TRAINING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- LOAN BILL 1996
- SYDNEY 2000 GAMES (INDICIA AND IMAGES) PROTECTION BILL 1996
- AUSTRALIAN SPORTS DRUG AGENCY AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- INDIGENOUS EDUCATION (SUPPLEMENTARY ASSISTANCE) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
-
SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (NEWLY ARRIVED RESIDENT'S WAITING PERIODS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 1996
- First Reading
- Second Reading
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- HOUSING ASSISTANCE BILL 1996
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Sale of Telstra
(Senator WHEELWRIGHT, Senator ALSTON) -
National Accounts Figures
(Senator MacGIBBON, Senator SHORT) -
Budget Deficit
(Senator SHERRY, Senator SHORT) -
Optus: Foreign Ownership
(Senator PATTERSON, Senator ALSTON) -
Housing
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator NEWMAN) -
Climate Change: Greenhouse Emissions
(Senator LEES, Senator HILL) -
Kakadu National Park
(Senator LUNDY, Senator HERRON) -
Land Fund
(Senator CHAMARETTE, Senator HERRON) -
Higher Education Funding
(Senator DENMAN, Senator VANSTONE) -
Equal Pay
(Senator MACKAY, Senator NEWMAN) -
Mahogany Glider
(Senator WOODLEY, Senator HILL) -
Defence Runways
(Senator FOREMAN, Senator NEWMAN) -
Mining Industry
(Senator TROETH, Senator PARER) -
Women
(Senator REID, Senator NEWMAN) -
Higher Education Funding
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator VANSTONE) -
Australian Defence Force Academy
(Senator NEWMAN) - Budget Deficit
-
Land Fund
(Senator CHAMARETTE) -
Kakadu National Park
(Senator BOB COLLINS, Senator Hill, Senator Campbell)
-
Sale of Telstra
-
SHIPPING GRANTS LEGISLATION BILL 1996
- Report of Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee
- ACCESS TO INTERNET
- COALITION: ELECTION COMMITMENTS
-
NOTICES OF MOTION
- Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Regulations
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- DOCUMENTS
- HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING
-
COMMITTEES
- Employment, Education and Training References Committee
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- PETITIONS
-
COMMITTEES
-
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee
- Report
-
Radioactive Waste Committee
- Report
- Consideration
-
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee
-
ADJOURNMENT
- Tasmanian Economy
- Western Australia: Liberal Party
- Second Sydney Airport Queensland Parliament
- Second Sydney Airport
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1449
Senator BOB COLLINS(3.29 p.m.)
—I move:
That the Senate take note of the answer given by the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (Senator Herron), to a question without notice asked by Senator Lundy today, relating to the management of Kakadu National Park.
Senator Hill, the Minister for the Environment, recently met with the board of management of Kakadu National Park. At that meeting—he was accompanied by Senator Parer—the future management of the park was raised not surprisingly with Senator Hill by the Aboriginal traditional owners. I have spoken to a number of them who were at that meeting. They told me that they were impressed with how forthright Senator Hill was in his answer to that question.
Senator Hill told the Aboriginal traditional owners, who represent a majority of the board, that the Commonwealth had `no hidden agenda' on this issue. He said that there had been no formal approach to the federal government from the Northern Territory government and, if there were to be such an approach, the traditional owners would be the first to know and their wishes in this matter would be paramount.
I would like to commend to Senator Herron and Senator Hill—and indeed to any other senators—a paper that was prepared, at my request, by the Parliamentary Research Service on this question in 1992. The paper provides a very succinct history and background as to the legal situation concerning the parks. I have always believed in giving credit—and I have given credit—where credit is due. I want to commend Senator Hill—
Senator Hill
—That's worrying. That will not do me any good.
Senator BOB COLLINS
—I am sorry about that, Robert, but I am quite sincere when I do this. I want to commend Senator Hill for the very direct way in which he answered the paramount concern of those people. I want to pass on to him the fact that they were extremely thankful and commended him for it.
The paper lays out the position very succinctly, as papers from the Parliamentary Library normally do. The parks are leased back to the Commonwealth government for 99 years. The parks are on Aboriginal owned land by virtue of a grant in freehold title to the relevant Aboriginal land trust under the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976. These 99-year leases specifically include provision for joint management of the parks by the Aboriginal owners and the Commonwealth parks service. Clause 9(b) of the lease agreement with the Commonwealth agrees not to transfer, assign, sublet or part with the possession of the park or any part of the park without the consent in writing of the lessor of the Kakadu Aboriginal Land Trust.
Senator Campbell
—Why didn't you ask the question of the responsible minister?
Senator BOB COLLINS
—I will answer that in a minute. A number of other clauses are enshrined in the lease to ensure against the enactment of any act or regulations that could substantially be detrimental to the interests of the owners—that is, the Aboriginal people. Any such action could be seen as a breach of a legally binding agreement by the Commonwealth, and would expose the Commonwealth to a substantial claim of damages.
The paper concluded that persuasion and coercion would be the more likely tactics to succeed in any alliance between the Commonwealth and the territory government to transfer management against the wishes of the owners. The reason I raise that is that the paper—it is an excellent paper on the legal position regarding Kakadu—makes it very clear that the most obvious way this would be done would be through a decline in budget funding for the park. I am assured by the statements made by the Minister for the Environment that there is no hidden agenda, and that that will not be the result in the budget.
Senator Campbell, in response to your interjection, we had thought of coming in here today and asking Senator Hill a question on these issues. But, on reconsideration, we decided that we would direct the question instead to the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (Senator Herron). At the weekend Senator Hill's assurances to the traditional owners got very prominent coverage in a major national paper, the Weekend Australian, where these assurances were prominently carried.
I was genuinely surprised that the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs, on an issue this significant—it got lots of publicity in the Northern Territory, let me tell you—was completely unaware of the assurances that his colleague had given to the Aboriginal traditional owners of the park.
These are important matters. We were interested in hearing a response from Senator Hill, but it was decided to ask the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs if he was aware of these widely publicised matters in order to find out just how much importance the government places on the Aboriginal affairs implications of this major issue. Judging by the performance of the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs here in Senate question time today, the answer is: very little.
Question resolved in the affirmative.