Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Current HansardDownload Current Hansard   

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Monday, 7 February 1994
Page: 464

Senator REYNOLDS —I present the 45th report of the Committee of Privileges, entitled Person Referred to in the Senate (Mr T.T. Vajda).

  Ordered that the report be printed.

Senator REYNOLDS —by leave—I move:

  That the report be adopted.

This is the nineteenth report of the committee concerning a matter raised by a person under privilege resolution 5 of 25 February 1988.  On 11 January 1994, Bertock and Associates, solicitors acting for Mr T.T. Vajda, wrote to the then President of the Senate, Senator the Hon. Kerry Sibraa, referring to remarks made by Senator Short on 20 May and 15 December 1993. On behalf of Mr Vajda, his solicitors requested that a response to the matters raised by Senator Short be incorporated in Hansard. Senator Sibraa accepted the letter as a submission for the purposes of the resolution of the Senate of 25 February 1988 relating to the protection of persons referred to in the Senate, and referred it to the Committee of Privileges on 28 January 1994. The committee decided to consider the submission made on Mr Vajda's behalf.

  As previously indicated to the Senate, in matters of this nature the committee does not judge the truth or otherwise of statements made by honourable senators or persons but, rather, ensures that a person's submission, and ultimately the response recommended by the committee, accord with the criteria set out in privilege resolution 5. Agreement was reached to treat the submission as Mr Vajda's response to the remarks made about him in accordance with privilege resolution 5, and Mr Vajda has agreed to the terms of the response. The committee recommends to the Senate that the response be incorporated in Hansard under privilege resolution 5(7)(b).

  Question resolved in the affirmative.

  The response read as follows





I was the subject of remarks in the Senate on 20 May 1993 by Senator Short (see pages 941 and 942) which were seriously damaging to me. As the Senator himself acknowledged explicitly (page 942 1st column, 5th paragraph), they were based on a report in the Sydney Morning Herald of 27 March 1993. My letter to the editor of the Sydney Morning Herald the next day denying the allegations was not published.

On 21 June 1993 my legal representatives wrote to Senator Short pointing out in detail the many errors in the Sydney Morning Herald article, and consequently in his remarks to the Senate. Senator Short again spoke on the matter in the Senate on 15 December 1993 (pages 4740 and 4741). There are further errors in what was said on that occasion.

I had nothing to do with the arrest or interrogation of Mrs. Magda Bardy and her then husband in Hungary in 1951. Senator Short's claim that I signed the arrest document of Mrs. Bardy's husband was not correct. The documents which it appears I signed in relation to Mrs Bardy and her husband were final decrees, recording administrative decisions made by the head of the State Defense Authority, and in fact prepared for signature by my then superior, Colonel Juhasz. These documents had nothing to do with arrest or interrogation, but came into existence only after a person had been interrogated, and recorded the decision of the head of the State Defense Authority as to what next was to happen to the person.

Far from being a Stalinist "hard-liner", I was myself arrested and imprisoned in 1953 by the "hard-line" Rakosi regime as part of a "Zionist conspiracy" fabricated by the Hungarian regime following upon the notorious "Jewish doctors' trial" contrived in Moscow by Stalin. I was tortured for five months to confess to being a zionist spy and conspirator. I was sentenced by a closed military court on other trumped up charges, not maltreating prisoners or preparing false statements.

I was sentenced to six years and served nearly four, before being released on 15 October 1956 by the moderate Kadar regime. The Russian army invaded Hungary on 4 November 1956, and far from seeking to associate with the re-instated "hard-liners", I fled Hungary on 24 November 1956.

I came to Australia on a boat with hundreds of other refugees from the Hungarian hard-line regime, and have lived in Australia under my own name, and have chosen to associate closely, both professionally and socially, with the Hungarian community in Australia, a community which of course includes victims of the sort of behaviour of which I am accused by Mrs. Bardy.

I achieved international recognition in dentistry, and have been invited to lecture at universities and international congresses in 19 countries. From 1969 I was many times an invited lecturer at the Scientific Meetings of the Hungarian Dental Association, held at the University of Medical Sciences in Budapest. Since 1969 I have visited Hungary 22 times, including occasions in 1991 and 1992 after the change of government. On all these occasions my lectures have been advertised under my name to all Hungarian dentists.