Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
National Residue Survey (Customs) Levy Amendment Bill 1998



Download WordDownload Word

Bills Digest No. 80   1998-99

 

National Residue Survey (Customs) Levy Amendment Bill 1998

Warning:

This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have any offi cial legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the Bill.

Contents

 

 

Passage History

National Residue Survey (Customs) Levy Amendment Bill 1998

Date Introduced: 3 December 1998

House: House of Representatives

Portfolio: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Commencement: 1 July 1999

Purpose

The major amendments proposed by the Bill are definitional and ensure consistency between the proposed Primary Industries (Customs) Levies Act 1998 and the National Residue Survey (Customs) Levy Act 1998 .

Background

This Bill forms part of a package of five Bills designed to consolidate 40 levy and charge imposition Acts into two principal Acts. The Bills in this package are the Primary Industries (Ex cise) Levies Bill 1998, the Primary Industries (Customs) Charges Bill 1998, the Primary Industries Levies and Charges (Consequential Amendments) Bill 1998, the National Residue Survey (Excise) Levy Amendment Bill 1998 and the Bill.

The reader is referred to the 'Background' to the Digest for the National Residue Survey (Excise) Levy Amendment Bill 1998.

Main Provisions

Amendments to the National Residue Survey (Customs) Levy Act 1998

The effect of the amendments proposed by items 1-3 of Schedule 1 of the Bill is to ensure consistency between the definitions of 'cattle', 'dairy cattle', 'horticultural products', 'lamb' and 'sheep' used in the Act and the proposed Primary Industries (Customs) Levies Act 1998.

image

Contact Officer

Ian Ireland

20 January 1999

Bills Digest Service

Information and Research Services

This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament.  While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public.