- Home
- Parliamentary Business
- Senators and Members
- News & Events
- About Parliament
- Visit Parliament
Permalink
Prev (2)
Next
Return to results list (3 results)




Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Annual meeting of the International Monetary Fund
Download PDF

FOR PRESS No. 943
⢠ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND - BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The following cabled report has been received on the
opening session of the Annual Meeting of the International
Monetary Fund in Vienna on 18th September, 1961. ,
. "Fund Annual Report was presented this morning and
Jacobsson (Managing Director) delivered opening statement.
Extract from main body of the statement is attached.
The question of the adequacy of the Fund’s resources was
the main issue raised in the statement. The discussion on
Fund matters will begin on Wednesday 20th September.
2. In his introductory statement Jacobsson ,oaid that' the
growing freedom for the international movement of funds
as a result of increased convertibility of the main
currencies had created new problems. With differences in
interest rates in the United States and Europe, and with
free convertibility of the main currencies, there had been
a temporary outflow of funds from the United States to
Europe. There had also been some movement from currencies
into gold.
3» However the United States balance of payments position
had improved in the latter part of I960 and early 1961· The
U.S. trade balance had been helped by boom conditions in
Europe and Japan and, by early 1961, the United States was
able to cover long term private investments abroad and
*
2.
Government expenditures abroad out of net income from
trade and services.
4. Jacobsson drew attention to the fact that there had
been an unusually large number of fund transactions over - -
the preceding year. This had been mainly due to the fact that
the general level of raw material prices had declined and a
number of countries had found themselves in balance of
payments difficulties and had turned to the fund for assistance.
In all 22 countries had received financial assistance from
fund during the last financial year.
5. « Jacobsson made a particular reference to the fund's
transaction with Australia and expressed his satisfaction that ,
Australia had been able to cancel its stand-by arrangement.
Following is the text of Jacobsson’s statement on this point -'The transaction with Australia in April,
which involved a drawing totalling the equivalent
Of 175 million U.S. dollars, in seven currencies
and a stand-by arrangement for an additional
100 million U.S. dollars, was made in support of
the Government's efforts to improve its foreign
payments position by means of fiscal, monetary,
and other measures. These efforts have been
most successful and I am happy to be able to
add that, in view of the improvement in the
3
position, the Australian authorities cancelled
the stand-by arrangement early this month after
. it had been in effect for only four months
instead of ,a year1. "
Canberra, A.C.T.
19th September, 1961» ·
Extract from Statement by the Managing Director in Presenting the Annual Report of the Executive Directors to the Board, of Governors of the Fund on September 18, 1$61
Drawings by the twenty-two countries during the year have totaled
the equivalent of $2,431 million. So large a use of Fund resources has
had a marked effect on the Fund’s holdings of currencies suitable for
use in transactions at the present time. Even after the replenishment
of these holdings by the sale of gold at the time of the drawing by the
United Kingdom, the Fund’s holdings of several convertible currencies
sire very low. In addition, we have to bear in mind that there are open
balances under stand-by arrangements equivalent to almost $1,200 million.
It had, indeed, become apparent at the end of last year, at the
time of the strong outflow of short-term funds from the United States,
that if the Fund were faced with substantial drawings by a number of
countries with large quotas, its available holdings of convertible cur
rencies xvould in all probability be inadequate. This has been borne out
by the experience of the last few months. The Fund can of.course make
use of its gold holdings, but these are not necessarily revolving, and
once they have been used for the replenishment of currency holdings they
may not readily be restored by repurchases in gold. The Fund should
therefore generally be careful in the use of its gold and should take
into account other possibilities for replenishing its currency holdings,
for instance by the borrowing of particular currencies under Article
VII of the Fund Agreement.
2
However, borrowing of currencies is not a method of replenishment
that can suddenly be improvised. For this and other reasons, the whole
complex of problems connected with such borrowing needs to be closely
examined and brought to an effective solution. Consideration of these
problems should be set against the wider background of the international
monetary system. In the vivid discussions on the merits and demerits
of the present system which have taken place in recent years and months,
attention has largely been devoted to the tensions which may result
from the international flow of funds in a world of convertible currencies,
and, as you know, a number of suggestions have been put forward advocating
more or less radical changes in the existing monetary arrangements. It
has been valuable that these matters have been so vigorously discussed,
but what we have to ask ourselves now is whether the present system can
be regarded as operating in a sufficiently satisfactory manner to be
worth maintaining. If that question is answered in the affirmative,
then we must consider whether any particular measures should be taken to
strengthen the existing institutional arrangements so as to provide suf
ficient safeguards against any dangerous tensions that may arise.
On the whole, I believe the system has worked well. It would in
deed be difficult to conclude otherwise in the light of the enormous
gains that have been made in recent years. In the purely monetary sphere,
external convertibility has been established, and with the better dis
tribution of reserves, there is an increasing measure of freedom for
capital movements. There has been a parallel development in the ever
growing liberalization of trade and, under conditions of relatively
stable prices, international trade has been increasing at an annual rate
- 3 -
of about 4 per cent In recent years, reflecting by and large a corres
ponding rate of growth In world production. These are no mean
achievements.
But In spite of these achievements there have been periods of
tension and unease. I do not think that the movements of short-term
funds from one country to another have really Impaired the financing
of trade or the flow of goods, but It Is largely the fears that these
movements have aroused that have led to the questioning of the soundness
of our present system. In some quarters doubts have been expressed
whether the system under which countries hold part of their Interna
tional reserves In currencies (which Is knovm as "the gold exchange
standard") will work satisfactorily In the longer run, and whether It
might not break down as It did In the lnterwar period. I do not think
we need draw that conclusion, for it is Important to remember that the
currency failures which occurred In the early 1930*s were caused not
by inflation, but by deflation--by a fall In prices which made itself
felt first in the United States and then in Europe. I am sure there
will be no such deflation now, for there has been such a change in the
objectives of the authorities that sufficient measures would surely be
taken to prevent such a calamity, If it seemed to be threatening.
Secondly, in the 19306s the exchange reserves of many of the European
countries had been acquired by large-scale short-term borrowing, and
melted away when the short-term loans were not renewed: today most
countries ire the true owners of their exchange holdings. A third
difference is that the Fund today stands behind the nations8 reserves,
supplementing them within the framework of its principles and practices
:·
- 4 -
and working at all times to promote International monetary consultation
and collaboration; there was no similar International agency in the
Intervar period.
Today two currencies, the United States dollar and sterling, are
the main reserve currencies. There is no doubt In my mind that the
authorities In the United States and the United Kingdom are determined
to pursue policies which will ensure confidence in the stability of
their currencies. Of the outstanding short-term U.S. liabilities,
about two thirds are In the hands of foreign central banks and govern
ments, and the remainder are largely held by commercial banks and business
firms. For sterling the proportion is very much the seme. Of these
currencies there are thus substantial amounts in private hands, and
in a convertible world, liquid resources owned by business firms and
banks can now with little or no difficulty be shifted from one country
to another. There is thus no lack of International liquidity in private
hands, and for this very reason it Is Important that there should he
adequate resources In official hands to meet the possible impact of
international movements of private funds.
As Indicated In the Report of the Executive Directors before you,
the Fund has been studying in the course of this year a broad range of
problems, seme of general Import and seme of a more detailed technical,
legal or Institutional character connected with this situation. It is
possible to summarize the main issues that have been considered in the
form of three questions. To begin with, what are the payments difficul
ties for which Fund resources may be made available under its Articles of
Agreement? Secondly, how can the Fund best use its resources to meet these
difficulties? And, finally, what resources are required to meet the dif
ficulties and are the Fund's available resources adequate to do so?
- 5 -
On the first question, the Executive Directors have discussed the
extent to which the Fund's resources may he used for helping to meet those
deficits in the balance of payments of members that go beyond the current
account and are attributable, in whole or in part, to capital transfers.
From a purely practical point of view, there is of course a great diffi
culty in separating current and capital payments under a system of con
vertible currencies. After a thorough examination of the various
aspects of the problem, the Executive Directors have clarified the inter
pretation that they had adopted on September 12, 1946, and in that way
eliminated any doubt which had not already been dissipated by the practices
of the Fund that the Fund resources can be used for capital transfers, in
accordance with Article VI and the other provisions of the Articles of
Agreement. If a country facing such an outflow of capital were to turn
to the Fund for assistance, the test would be the same as in the case of
countries with current account deficits, i.e., that appropriate measures
were being taken, so that the disequilibrating capital outflow would be
arrested and the repayment of any assistance provided by the Fund thereby
made possible within a maximum period of three to five years.
The answer to the second question— how the Fund can best use its
resources--must take into account the strengthening of the current posi
tion and reserves of several member countries and the increased number
which have accepted the obligations of Article VIII. This has made
possible the use of a much wider range of currencies held by the Fund, thus
increasing the volume of its usable resources. The Fund has therefore
sought to diversity the use of its currency holdings in such a manner as to
ensure that transactions with the Fund, and their repayment, will be con
ducted in those currencies which will be most helpful to the world* payments
- 6 -
situation. In pursuing this objective, the Fund has teen guided increasingly
by the principle that drawings should be in the currencies of those coun
tries that have a strong payments and reserve position, while it is to be
hoped that repayments will be made in those currencies that can be
strengthened by their use in this way. There are a number of technical and
legal problems to be faced in evolving a satisfactory program for the use
of a wider range of currencies in Fund transactions and repayments. Some
have already been resolved, others will need further attention. A measure
of the success already achieved is shown by the fact that during the last
year drawings have been made in eleven different currencies.
As a result of sales of their currencies by the Fund, a number of
countries in the Fund have now acquired increased drawing rights because
the Fund's holdings of their currencies have been reduced considerably below
75 per cent of quota. The Fund must therefore always take account of the
fact that, should there be a reversal in the payments position, the existence
of these increased drawing rights could give rise to appreciable demands on
the resources of the Fund.
I come now to the third question— the adequacy of the Fund's resources.
It v;ill be apparent from what I have said about the Fund's evolving policies
on the currencies that should be d r a w that the answer to this question
cannot be settled simply by adding up the Fund's holdings of gold and cur
rencies, or even gold and convertible currencies, at any particular time.
V/hat is important is to ensure that the Fund has enough of those currencies
which it would be appropriate to use at any particular time, given the
economic conditions of that time and the purposes for which it is appro
priate to use the Fund resources.
- 7 -
I have already referred to the fact that the intense activity over
the last year has reduced the Fund's holdings of certain currencies to a
very low level, despite the recent sale of $500 million of the Fund's gold.
But this is more than a transitory problem confined to the present circum
stances, and is more than just the narrow question of the Fund's own
liquidity. It is vital to consolidate and defend the convertible system
built up over the last few years, and to avoid the risk of any relapse into
restrictions and currency disorder. In order that the Fund may play its
part in this effort and meet the expectations of its members, it must be in
a position to provide resources that are adequate beyond doubt to meet
any needs that may arise. And in a world in which market fears and expec
tations play a large role, resources— national and international combined--
must not only be adequate to meet demands that may be made on them, but also
large enough to convince the public that they are adequate to defend cur
rencies from ill-advised speculation. A substantial reduction in the Fund's
holdings of major international currencies could itself become a disturbing
factor, long before the point of exhaustion is reached, unless there existed
arrangements for replenishing these holdings.
All these questions have to be evaluated in the light of the swift
changes in the balance of international payments that have occurred in
recent years. In the circumstances I cannot conclude that the composition
and size of the Fund!8 resources are adequate to support a healthy inter
national financial structure without further strengthening. The need for
additional resources might be remedied by an increase in particular quotas, ; .·
but in present circumstances I belipve it can be handled more acceptably by
firm borrowing arrangements, ί These would be concluded, in particular, with
the main industrial countries, because of the major role they play in the
- β -
swings in international trade and payments. This does not mean that
other countries would have no interest in the conclusion of such arrange
ments, for the maintenance of a stable and convertible exchange system,
is as important to them as it is to the industrial countries.
Some of the problems arising from use to be made of the Fund's bor
rowing powers under Article VII of the Fund Agreement have already been
discussed in general terms by the Executive Directors, but many aspects
still remain to be considered. An essential step in the conclusion of any
borrowing plan is for the author!tie s in the individual countries to obtain
the power to lend to the Fund if they do not already possess it. However,
it would not in my opinion be sufficient to leave the actual borrowing
transaction to an ad hoc agreement, between the Fund and the lending
country, under these powers. There is great merit in an assurance that
additional resources are available for its transactions. The ready
availability of resources is itself a contribution to stability and
strength. It has time and again been the experience of the Fund that as
surance to a member that it has access to the resources of the Fund under
the provisions of a stand-by arrangement is in itself a stabilizing factor
of great importance, and that often it has not been necessary for the member
to use all, or, indeed, any of the drawing rights thus assured. There is no
reason to believe that the same sort of benefit would not be obtained from
credit facilities granted to the Fund.
At the same time, adequate provisions would have to be made for con
sultation and general.safeguards for the lending members. Thus it should
be part of the arrangement that the Fund would not borrow from a member
country unless the country's payments and reserve position permitted this.
- 9 -
Moreover, the arrangement would be such that any member that had lent its
currency to the Fund would readily be able to obtain repayment if its own
payments position changed. There would of course be no question of any
weakening of the principles that the Fund has worked out for the appro
priate use of its resources. These have stood the test of time in a great
variety of circumstances, and we know they are endorsed by the members of
the Fund.
I believe that it should not be difficult to arrive at an agreement
that will give due weight to all the aspects of borrowing, and thus to
establish a workable system which would be beneficial and acceptable to
all members of the Fund. There Eire however clearly a number of decisions i i, ' â '
of policy to/be taken.
As is said in the Annual Report of the Executive Directors, this
approach to the increase in the Fund's resources by means of borrowing "looks
beyond the immediate needs and endeavors to equip the Fund to handle flexibly
the many and varied situations that may arise under a system of freely
convertible currencies."