



Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- PAPERS
- BANK NOTES TAX BILL
-
NAVIGATION BILL
- Division
- LYNCH, Patrick
- PEARCE, George
- SAYERS, Robert
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- MILLEN, Edward
- RUSSELL, Edward
- PEARCE, George
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- LYNCH, Patrick
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- DE LARGIE, Hugh
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- Division
- Procedural Text
- STEWART, James
- PEARCE, George
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- PEARCE, George
- KEATING, John
- STEWART, James
- VARDON, Joseph
- MILLEN, Edward
- MILLEN, Edward
- PEARCE, George
- MILLEN, Edward
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- LYNCH, Patrick
- PEARCE, George
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- PEARCE, George
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- LYNCH, Patrick
- PEARCE, George
- MILLEN, Edward
- PEARCE, George
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- PEARCE, George
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- MCCOLL, James
- MILLEN, Edward
- LYNCH, Patrick
- FRASER, Simon
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- MILLEN, Edward
- MCCOLL, James
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- MILLEN, Edward
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- MCCOLL, James
- TURLEY, Henry
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- SAYERS, Robert
- SAYERS, Robert
- MCCOLL, James
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- DE LARGIE, Hugh
- MILLEN, Edward
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- MILLEN, Edward
- TURLEY, Henry
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- MILLEN, Edward
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- MILLEN, Edward
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- MILLEN, Edward
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- MILLEN, Edward
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- MILLEN, Edward
- GUTHRIE, Robert
- ST LEDGER, Anthony
- MCGREGOR, Gregor
- MILLEN, Edward
- Division
Senator MILLEN (New South Wales)
. - The clause under consideration, which is specific and clear enough, provides that " no person other than a superintendent," apart from the owner, master, mate, or engineer, shall engage or supply a seaman; whilst the next clause provides that a seamen's inspector may supply seamen. The one clause says that a certain thing shall be done, and the other says that it shall not be done, and that if it is done, a penalty of £50 shall be imposed, or - what is very much better, seeing that a Government officer is concerned - three months' imprisonment. I should like to know how the Minister reconciles two clauses, one of which says that a thing shall be done, whilst the other says that it shall not?
