



Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- QUESTION
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- ESTATE DUTY ASSESSMENT BILL 1970
- GRIEVANCE DEBATE
- QUESTION
- WOOL INDUSTRY BILL 1970
- AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL BILL 1970
- CUSTOMS TARIFF BILL 1970
- MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNORGENERAL
- HOMES SAVINGS GRANT BILL 1970
- DRIED FRUITS EXPORT CHARGES BILL 1970
- PARLIAMENTARY ALLOWANCES BILL 1970
- AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MAKINE SCIENCE BILL 1970
- PRINTING COMMITTEE
- STATES GRANTS (UNIVERSITIES) BILL 1970
- CANNED FRUITS EXPORT MARKETING BILL 1970
- INTERNATIONAL MONETARY AGREEMENTS BILL 1970
- ADJOURNMENT
-
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS UPON NOTICE
-
Civil Aviation: Night Flights (Question No. 673)
(DALY, Fred, WHITLAM, Gough, SWARTZ, Reginald, BARNES, Charles) -
Industrial Information Bulletin (Question No. 814)
(CAMERON, Clyde, WHITLAM, Gough, BURY, Leslie, SNEDDEN, Billy, BOWEN, Nigel) -
Mousing: Finance (Question No. 998)
(CALWELL, Arthur, BURY, Leslie) -
Taxation (Question No, 548)
(WEBB, Charles, BURY, Leslie) -
Company and Bankruptcy Legislation (Question No. 291)
(CAMERON, Clyde, SNEDDEN, Billy) -
Conciliation and Arbitration Procedures (Question No. 446)
(CAMERON, Clyde, SNEDDEN, Billy) -
Conciliation and Arbitration Act (Question No. 808)
(CAMERON, Clyde, EVERINGHAM, Douglas, SNEDDEN, Billy, MCMAHON, William) -
United Nations Charter (Question No. 987)
(EVERINGHAM, Douglas, MCMAHON, William) -
English Spelling Conventions and Usage (Question No. 1058)
(EVERINGHAM, Douglas, MCMAHON, William) -
Australian Aid to Fiji (Question No. 939)
(KEATING, Paul, MCMAHON, William) -
Australian Water Resources Council (Question No. 73)
(WHITLAM, Gough, SWARTZ, Reginald) -
Australian Forestry Council (Question No. 75)
(WHITLAM, Gough, SWARTZ, Reginald) -
Australian Minerals Council (Question No. 74)
(WHITLAM, Gough, CAMERON, Clyde, SWARTZ, Reginald, BARNES, Charles) -
Australian Capital Territory: Housing (Question No. 740)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Australian Capital Territory: Housing (Question No. 737)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Australian Capital Territory: Housing (Question No. 736)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Australian Capital Territory: Housing (Question No. 659}
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Australian Capital Territory: Self-Government (Question No. 832)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Australian Capital Territory: Housing (Question No. 741)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Darwin: Port Development (Question No. 22)
(EVERINGHAM, Douglas, SWARTZ, Reginald) -
Great Barrier Reef (Question No. 38)
(WHITLAM, Gough, GORTON, John) -
Australian Capital Territory: Parkway System (Question No. 831)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter) -
Australian Capital Territory: Parks and Reserves (Question No. 834)
(WHITLAM, Gough, NIXON, Peter)
-
Civil Aviation: Night Flights (Question No. 673)
Mr GILES (Angas)
- The honourable member for Dawson (Dr Patterson) has quite accurately described the machinery of the Bill and there is no need for me to repeat what he has said. I will however touch on it initially in order to make One more comment. The Canned Fruit Excise Fund, which is controlled by the Australian Canned Fruits Board, is the fund in which the surpluses described by the honourable member for Dawson are held. As the honourable member for Dawson explained, these excess funds are to be paid back to the canners under the terms of this legislation. I am not quite clear whether the growers will receive any part payment of this amount from the canners.
I would add only one thing to his general argument. He mentioned quite properly the agreement following which the industry or perhaps the Board decided, after some negotiations, to discontinue as from 1st January 1969 its promotional activities in the West German market.I think one can continue this argument just a stage further and say that there is a lesson in what has happened for members of Parliament. The
Fund is a government fund, although the contributions came from the industry itself; the moneys are not held by the industry.
My understanding of what happened is that one signatory to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, in this case I think the United States, objected in some way to our trade promotional activities on the West German market. The lesson to be learned from this situation is that it is very difficult, whether by growers funds or governmental funds, to subsidise some forms of primary industry without running into this type of objection from signatories to GATT who happened to be concerned with a market outlet.
That is about all I wish to add to the remarks of the honourable member for Dawson. This is nol an important Bill. It is a very minor one. But it will provide the machinery to allow the surplus funds held in the Canned Fruit Excise Fund by the Australian Canned Fruits Board to be disbursed to the canners. There is one other point. It is the intention of the industry to mount a bigger and, I suppose, a more expensive type of promotion fund in 1970. Some of the moneys for this will come from the excess presently held in the Canned Fruit Excise Fund. 1 support the Bill.
Question resolved in the affirmative.
Bill read a second time.
Third Residing
Leave granted for third reading to be moved forthwith.
Bill (on motion by Mr Anthony) read a third time.
