

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2002-03
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
-
General Business
- Notice given 14 February 2002
- Notice given 11 March 2002
- Notice given 16 May 2002
- Notice given 26 June 2002
- Notice given 19 August 2002
- Notice given 22 August 2002
- Notice given 16 September 2002
- Notice given 19 September 2002
- Notice given 24 September 2002
- Notice given 17 October 2002
- Notice given 24 October 2002
- Notice given 12 November 2002
- Notice given 13 November 2002
- Notice given 9 December 2002
- Notice given 18 March 2003
- Notice given 25 March 2003
- Notice given 18 August 2003
- Notice given 19 August 2003
- Notice given 8 September 2003
- Notice given 9 September 2003
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged, Laid Aside or Negatived
-
Questions on Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 12 February 2002
- Notice given 15 March 2002
- Notice given 8 April 2002
- Notice given 18 April 2002
- Notice given 19 June 2002
- Notice given 2 July 2002
- Notice given 11 July 2002
- Notice given 22 July 2002
- Notice given 15 August 2002
- Notice given 20 August 2002
- Notice given 13 September 2002
- Notice given 17 September 2002
- Notice given 23 September 2002
- Notice given 24 September 2002
- Notice given 15 October 2002
- Notice given 7 November 2002
- Notice given 8 November 2002
- Notice given 11 November 2002
- Notice given 21 November 2002
- Notice given 26 November 2002
- Notice given 29 November 2002
- Notice given 3 December 2002
- Notice given 10 December 2002
- Notice given 11 December 2002
- Notice given 13 December 2002
- Notice given 7 January 2003
- Notice given 14 January 2003
- Notice given 17 January 2003
- Notice given 17 February 2003
- Notice given 25 February 2003
- Notice given 18 March 2003
- Notice given 20 March 2003
- Notice given 25 March 2003
- Notice given 27 March 2003
- Notice given 2 April 2003
- Notice given 17 April 2003
- Notice given 22 April 2003
- Notice given 7 May 2003
- Notice given 9 May 2003
- Notice given 14 May 2003
- Notice given 22 May 2003
- Notice given 6 June 2003
- Notice given 10 June 2003
- Notice given 16 June 2003
- Notice given 17 June 2003
- Notice given 18 June 2003
- Notice given 19 June 2003
- Notice given 20 June 2003
- Notice given 23 June 2003
- Notice given 24 June 2003
- Notice given 25 June 2003
- Notice given 26 June 2003
- Notice given 27 June 2003
- Notice given 3 July 2003
- Notice given 7 July 2003
- Notice given 10 July 2003
- Notice given 11 July 2003
- Notice given 14 July 2003
- Notice given 15 July 2003
- Notice given 17 July 2003
- Notice given 18 July 2003
- Notice given 21 July 2003
- Notice given 22 July 2003
- Notice given 24 July 2003
- Notice given 25 July 2003
- Notice given 28 July 2003
- Notice given 1 August 2003
- Notice given 4 August 2003
- Notice given 5 August 2003
- Notice given 7 August 2003
- Notice given 8 August 2003
- Notice given 11 August 2003
- Notice given 12 August 2003
- Notice given 13 August 2003
- Notice given 14 August 2003
- Notice given 15 August 2003
- Notice given 18 August 2003
- Notice given 19 August 2003
- Notice given 20 August 2003
- Notice given 21 August 2003
- Notice given 22 August 2003
- Notice given 25 August 2003
- Notice given 26 August 2003
- Notice given 1 September 2003
- Notice given 2 September 2003
- Notice given 3 September 2003
- Notice given 4 September 2003
- Notice given 6 September 2003
- Notice given 8 September 2003
- Notice given 9 September 2003
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- A Guide to the Daily Notice Paper
- A Guide to the Full Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 12 August 2003
1751 Senator Ludwig: To ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General—
(1) What is the total amount budgeted for the Protective Security Coordination Centre.
(2) How much of this budget is allocated for staff wages.
(3) What is the wage scale for staff.
(4) How many calls does the Protective Security Coordination Centre receive each day.
(5) How is information received on the hotline forwarded to respective agencies.
(6) Is there a criteria to determine which agency should receive incoming information; if so, can this criteria be provided.
(7) Are there any reporting processes in place to determine the feasibility of the program; if so, can these details be provided; if not, why not.
(8) Is there a counselling service for staff who are showing signs or symptoms of distress relating to calls they receive during working hours; if not, why not.
1752 Senator Ludwig: To ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General—With reference to the answer to question on notice no. 23 asked during the 2003-04 Budget estimates hearings of the Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee:
(1) Is there an option for an alternate contact person in the event the programmer contracted is unavailable.
(2) What are the hours of operation.
1753 Senator Ludwig: To ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General—In relation to the Community Legal Services Information System design and development of a new data collection and reporting system:
(1) What data is collected.
(2) What is the data used for.
(3) Who has access to the database.
(4) Can examples be provided of the records kept or information gathered as a result of information gained by this database.
(5) Will the report be reviewed; if not, why not; if so: (a) when will the review be held; and (b) when will a report be released.
1754 Senator Ludwig: To ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General—In relation to the department’s submission to the Attorney-General on Community Legal Centres and the Regional Law Hotline: Can a copy be provided of the department’s submission be provided.
Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1757-1759)—
- Have any analyses been conducted in relation to a national carbon tax or greenhouse gas emissions trading system; if so, can the following information be provided: (a) the dates the analyses were conducted; (b) who did the work; and (c) where copies of these analyses can be obtained.
- (a) What meetings have been held between government and industry to discuss carbon taxes or emissions trading this year; (b) who attended the meetings; (b) when were the meetings held; and (c) what was discussed.
1758 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
1759 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1760-1761)—With reference to the review of the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target Scheme:
(1) What input, if any, have the following agencies had to the preparation of the panel’s report: Environment Australia, Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of Industry, Tourism and resources, Treasury, any other government agencies.
(2) What advice, analysis or information have the agencies listed in paragraph (1) provided to the review, and can a copy be provided.
(3) Can a list be provided of groups and individuals with whom the review panel has met, including the dates of the meetings, locations and length.
(4) Can a list be provided of confidential submissions including reasons as to why they have been made confidential.
(5) (a) Has the Government of New South Wales made a submission; (b) did the panel request a submission from New South Wales or have any meetings with representatives of the New South Wales Government; if so, can details be provided.
1760 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
1761 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1762-1764)—In relation to the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) scheme:
- What analyses of MRET have been conducted by the department or its agencies; please include in the answer: (a) a description of each analysis; (b) when it was carried out; (c) by whom; and (d) its conclusions.
- Has any assessment been undertaken of the economic, environmental and social benefits of different MRET targets in 2010; if so, what were the conclusions.
- What information or analysis has been obtained on levels of renewable energy targets internationally and the benefits derived from them.
1763 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
1764 Minister representing the Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources
Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1765-1766)—
(1) Why has Australia slipped from providing 5 per cent of the world’s photovoltaic (PV) power to less than 1 per cent.
(2) Is the Minister concerned that Australia’s advantage in PV power has declined so precipitately; if so, what are the consequences, environmentally and economically, of the decline.
(3) Why is PV power going ahead so fast in Japan and Germany.
(4) What action is being taken to bring Australia’s PV power back up to 5 per cent of world production.
1765 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
1766 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1769-1770)—
(1) (a) How many cameras watch over the Aboriginal Tent Embassy and surrounding area; and (b) how long have these cameras been in place.
(2) (a) Were any persons identified as responsible for the fire bombing of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy on 14 June 2003; and (b) did the camera footage show people in the vicinity who may have been responsible.
(3) Can the original unedited video of 14 June 2003 (24 hours) be available for viewing by Senator Brown’s office.
1769 Minister representing the Minister for Regional Services, Territories and Local Government
1770 Minister representing the Minister for Regional Services, Territories and Local Government