

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2002-03
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
-
General Business
- Notice given 14 February 2002
- Notice given 11 March 2002
- Notice given 16 May 2002
- Notice given 26 June 2002
- Notice given 19 August 2002
- Notice given 22 August 2002
- Notice given 16 September 2002
- Notice given 19 September 2002
- Notice given 24 September 2002
- Notice given 17 October 2002
- Notice given 24 October 2002
- Notice given 12 November 2002
- Notice given 13 November 2002
- Notice given 9 December 2002
- Notice given 18 March 2003
- Notice given 25 March 2003
- Notice given 18 June 2003
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged, Laid Aside or Negatived
-
Questions on Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 12 February 2002
- Notice given 15 March 2002
- Notice given 8 April 2002
- Notice given 18 April 2002
- Notice given 19 June 2002
- Notice given 2 July 2002
- Notice given 10 July 2002
- Notice given 11 July 2002
- Notice given 22 July 2002
- Notice given 15 August 2002
- Notice given 20 August 2002
- Notice given 13 September 2002
- Notice given 17 September 2002
- Notice given 23 September 2002
- Notice given 24 September 2002
- Notice given 15 October 2002
- Notice given 1 November 2002
- Notice given 7 November 2002
- Notice given 8 November 2002
- Notice given 11 November 2002
- Notice given 12 November 2002
- Notice given 21 November 2002
- Notice given 26 November 2002
- Notice given 29 November 2002
- Notice given 3 December 2002
- Notice given 10 December 2002
- Notice given 11 December 2002
- Notice given 13 December 2002
- Notice given 7 January 2003
- Notice given 14 January 2003
- Notice given 17 January 2003
- Notice given 3 February 2003
- Notice given 17 February 2003
- Notice given 25 February 2003
- Notice given 27 February 2003
- Notice given 10 March 2003
- Notice given 14 March 2003
- Notice given 18 March 2003
- Notice given 20 March 2003
- Notice given 25 March 2003
- Notice given 27 March 2003
- Notice given 2 April 2003
- Notice given 8 April 2003
- Notice given 14 April 2003
- Notice given 16 April 2003
- Notice given 17 April 2003
- Notice given 22 April 2003
- Notice given 7 May 2003
- Notice given 30 April 2003
- Notice given 2 May 2003
- Notice given 5 May 2003
- Notice given 6 May 2003
- Notice given 7 May 2003
- Notice given 9 May 2003
- Notice given 13 May 2003
- Notice given 14 May 2003
- Notice given 15 May 2003
- Notice given 19 May 2003
- Notice given 22 May 2003
- Notice given 27 May 2003
- Notice given 30 May 2003
- Notice given 2 June 2003
- Notice given 4 June 2003
- Notice given 5 June 2003
- Notice given 6 June 2003
- Notice given 10 June 2003
- Notice given 11 June 2003
- Notice given 13 June 2003
- Notice given 16 June 2003
- Notice given 17 June 2003
- Notice given 18 June 2003
- Notice given 19 June 2003
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- A Guide to the Daily Notice Paper
- A Guide to the Full Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 15 May 2003
1465 Senator Brown: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage—With reference to the 2003-04 budget:
(1) For each of the financial years from 2002-03 to 2006-07: can a breakdown be provided of the ‘Greenhouse - meeting the challenge of climate change’ program in Table A1 of the Environment Statement, in the same format as was provided in Table A2.1 of the 2002-03 Environment Statement (i.e. give the expenditure for each individual activity within the greenhouse program and show the adjustment for the discontinuation of the Capital Use Charge (CUC)).
(2) For each of the financial years from 2002-03 to 2006-07: how much has been allocated to the Natural Heritage Trust and what effect does the discontinuation of the CUC have.
(3) For each of the financial years from 2002-03 to 2006-07: how much has been allocated to the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality and what effect does the discontinuation of the CUC have.
1466 Senator Brown: To ask the Minister for Health and Ageing—
(1) What are the contingency plans for the provision of medical services, particularly obstetrics, if general practitioners, obstetricians and gynaecologists and other medical specialists withdraw their services as threatened on 1 July 2003.
(2) How will public hospitals cope if risky services such as obstetrics, gynaecology and neuro-surgery are transferred to the public hospitals, if they agree and cover visiting medical officers for all procedures performed under their roof.
Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1468-1469)—
(1) Is the Minister aware that logging is being conducted on private property at Black Tier near Woodbury and Bowsden Hill at Lake Tiberias, Tasmania.
(2) Is the Minister aware that the area in which these logging operations are taking place is suffering serious tree decline.
(3) (a) How much Commonwealth funding has been given to individuals and agencies in Tasmania to research or combat tree decline in the past decade; and (b) can a list of all projects and recipients be provided.
(4) Has any Commonwealth funding been spent on the private properties at Black Tier or Bowsden Hill where the logging is taking place; if so: (a) how much; (b) when; and (c) subject to what conditions.
(5) Is Commonwealth funding related to tree decline specifically, or land and water degradation generally, in Tasmania contingent on the state and/or landholder protecting native vegetation from logging or clearing; if not, why not.
(6) Does the Minister agree with the Chief Practices Officer of the Forest Practices Board who was quoted in the Mercury , of 27 April 2003, as saying, ‘the selective logging that was going on at the two sites would not impact on tree decline’ and ‘the logging would help the trees to survive by promoting regeneration’.
1468 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
1469 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage