Search Results

Parliament of Australia Departmentof Parliamentary Services Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Table 1 - Electoral district by electoral division ................................................................................. 1 Table 2 - Electoral division by electoral district ............................................................................... 20 BACKGROUND NOTE 2 June 2011 How do federal and state electorates overlap? Paul Nelson Statistics and Mapping Section Concordance between

      Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Contents  Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1  Table 1a â€  Local Government Area by electoral division ......................................................................... 3  Table 1b â€ Ele ctoral division by Local Government Area ....................................................................... 13  Table 2a â€  Statistical Local Area by electoral division ............................................................................ 23  Table 2b â€ Ele ctoral division by Statistical Local Area ............................................................................ 45  BACKGROUND NOTE   3 February 2011 Local Government Areas and Statistical Local Areas in  electoral divisions  Paul Nelson  Statistics and Mapping Section  Local Government Areas and Statistical Local Areas in electoral divisions  1  Introduction  This Background Note provides two concordances. One concordance lists the proportion of people in  each Local Government Area (LGA) that fall within each Commonwealth electoral division while the  other concordance lists the proportion of people in each Statistical Local Area (SLA) that fall within  each Commonwealth electoral division. The concordances are base d on the 2010 edition of the  Australian Standard Geographic Classification (ASGC) as published by the Australian Bureau of  Statistics (ABS).1 The concordances incorporate the current electoral boundaries, i.e. those in force  at the federal election of August 2010.  The concordances were generated by processing the 2006 Census population figures for Census  Collection Districts (CCDs). Each CCD was allocated to the relevant SLA, LGA and electoral division of  best fit. LGA and SLA nam es are not unique across states and territories thus a one digit state code is  concatenated with the four digit ASGC code for either the SLA or LGA to create a unique 5 digit code  in the accompanying tables. Each LGA comprises one or more whole SLAs thus the two conco rdances  are closely related.  The two concordances enable statistical information published on a SLA or LGA basis, by  organisations such as the ABS, to be converted into electoral division totals. For example the  population of the LGA ‘Auburn (C)’ lies 76.8 per cent in the Reid division and 23.2 per cen t in the  Blaxland division. Since the SLA of ‘Auburn (C)’ is the same area as the LGA of ‘Auburn (C)’, the same 

Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 28 July 2010, no. 1, 2010-11, ISSN 1834-9854 Socio-economic indexes for 2009 electoral divisions: 2006 Census Paul Nelson Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary • The Census collects data on a

Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament BACKGROUND NOTE www.aph.gov.au/library 1 31 March 2009 Tasmanian redistribution, 2009 Paul Nelson Statistics and Mapping Section Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 17 March 2008, no. 23 2007-08, ISSN 1834-9854 revised 4 February 2009 Electoral division rankings: Census 2006 second release Paul Nelson Statistics & Mapping Section Executive summary This research paper provides