Browse By

Close Facet Group

Collection

Close Facet Group

Date

Close Facet Group

Parliament No.




Search Results

     
Summary results: 106-120 of 1144 matches.
Email List Link   Print List   RSS Feed
First Page Previous Page
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Next Page Last Page

For this page            
  •   MAY 6, 2011 Gambling on the pokies - recommendations for government policy The Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform has just released a report into the design and implementation of a mandatory pre-commitment system for electronic gaming (poker) machines. The introduction of mandatory pre-commitment technology for poker machines
    Date: 06/05/2011 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/844470 - Source: FlagPost - Author: THOMAS, Matthew

  •   MAY 6, 2011 Means testing the private health insurance rebate—one more attempt in a changed parliamentary environment? In the 2009-10 Budget the Rudd government announced it intended to means-test the private health insurance rebate which it said would deliver savings of $1.9 billion over 4 years. The rebate reimburses
    Date: 06/05/2011 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/844480 - Source: FlagPost - Author: BIGGS, Amanda

  •   APRIL 4, 2011 Making savings from the PBS - is deferring the listing of medicines the answer? In a recent speech, Prime Minister Gillard warned that there would be ‘painful’ cutbacks in the forthcoming Budget. There was no indication of where these cuts might be but it appears that
    Date: 04/04/2011 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/844485 - Source: FlagPost - Author: DE BOER, Rebecca

  • ISSN 1328-8091 Parliament of Australia Departmentof Parliamentary Services Contents Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Child Care Tax Rebate (CCTR) ............................................................................................................. 2 The original model ......................................................................................................................... 2 2007 Election Commitments and reform since then ..................................................................... 3 Financial implications ............................................................................................................................... 4 Key provisions .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Schedule 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Amendment of
    Date: 22/03/2011 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/640296 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: DANIELS, Dale

  • ISSN 1328-8091 Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Contents Purposes ................................................................................................................................................... 4 NBN Co financial heads of agreement with Telstra .................................................................. 5 Further background information .............................................................................................. 6 Basis of policy commitment ................................................................................................................ 6 Committee consideration ................................................................................................................... 7 Previous committee consideration ................................................................................................ 7 Current committee consideration ................................................................................................. 9 Future committee
    Date: 17/03/2011 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/628753 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: DALZELL, Brian - PYB...

  • ISSN 1328-8091 Parliament of Australia Departmentof Parliamentary Services Contents Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Basis of policy commitment ................................................................................................................ 4 Committee consideration ................................................................................................................... 5 Current consideration .................................................................................................................... 5 Previous consideration .................................................................................................................. 5 Policy position of non-government parties and independents .......................................................... 6 Coalition ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Australian Greens .......................................................................................................................... 6 Senator
    Date: 28/02/2011 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/589584 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: PYBURNE, Paula

  • ISSN 1328-8091 Parliament of Australia Departmentof Parliamentary Services Contents Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Committee consideration ........................................................................................................................ 4 Schedule 1—Film tax offsets .................................................................................................................... 4 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Main provisions ................................................................................................................................... 5 Schedule 2—Capital protected borrowings ............................................................................................. 6 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Capital protected borrowings ........................................................................................................ 6 Deductibility of interest on capital protected borrowings
    Date: 23/02/2011 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/574806 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: MURRAY, John

  • JANUARY 25, 2011 Financing of aged care - recommendations from the Productivity Commission The draft report of the Productivity Commission’s (PC) Inquiry into Caring for Older Australians, released on 21 January 2011, provides a sobering assessment of the current state of the aged care system. It argues that the current
    Date: 25/01/2011 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/1032117 - Source: FlagPost - Author: DE BOER, Rebecca

  •     ISBN 1834‐9854  Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services   RESEARCH PAPER NO. 9, 2010-11  12 January 2011 Marketing obesity? Junk food, advertising and kids  Dr Rhonda Jolly  Social Policy  Executive summary  • Childhood obesity has been labelled one of the most serious public health issues of the 21 st   century.  • Overweight and obese children typically grow into overweight and obese adults, who are  susceptible to chronic complaints such as diabetes and cardio vascular disease. These diseases  place considerable burdens on national health systems and economies.   • It can be argued therefore that policy which encourages healthy eating habits is desirable.   However, the increasing availability of foods high in fat, sugar and salt (so called junk foods)  across the world has made eating healthily a challenge.    • This challenge, according to some research, is compounded by advertising that adversely  influences people’s food preferences and consumption patterns. As a consequence of this  research, there has been considerable advocacy which has urged governments to place  limitations on the advertising of junk foods, particularly to children.  • In opposition, other research has supported the argument that junk food can be part of a  balanced diet and that it should be the responsibility of individuals, including children, to make  decisions about what they consume.   • This paper considers both sides of this debate.    • The paper also looks briefly at the policy approaches to junk food in a number of countries and  consequent actions taken to control or prohibit the influence of advertising. In particular, the  paper notes recent Australian Government approaches to dealing with this issue.    • The paper concludes that to date, the Australian response to this issue has emphasised the value  of a self regulatory regime.  However, this approach may be modified in the future, as a result of  a number of factors. These include growing public demand for intervention and a shift in health  policy more towards preventive health than has been emphasised in the past.   
    Date: 12/01/2011 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/481449 - Source: Research Paper (Parliamen... - Author: JOLLY, Rhonda

  • NOVEMBER 29, 2010 Market concentration in the banking sector - household loans Recently, there has been considerable concern amongst politicians, the media and the broader community regarding competition in the Australian banking sector. Specifically, concerns have been raised regarding banks increasing certain lending rates over and above rises in the
    Date: 29/11/2010 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/1040053 - Source: FlagPost - Author: KOMPO-HARMS, Scott

  • ISSN 1328-8091 Parliament of Australia Departmentof Parliamentary Services Contents Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Australian Research Council ............................................................................................................... 2 Committee consideration ................................................................................................................... 3 Financial implications ............................................................................................................................... 3 Key provisions .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Schedule 1—Amendments to the Australian Research Council Act 2001 .......................................... 4 BILLS DIGEST NO. 49, 2010-11 24 November
    Date: 24/11/2010 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/383664 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: COOMBS, Moira

  •     ISSN 1328‐8091  Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services BILLS DIGEST NO. 45, 2010-11  18 November 2010 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition  and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010  Brian Dalzell   Economics Section  Paula Pyburne  Law and Bills Digest Section  Contents  History of the Bill...................................................................................................................................... 3  Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 3  Background .............................................................................................................................................. 4  Australian telecommunications sector ............................................................................................... 4  History ............................................................................................................................................ 4  Telecommunications sector outcomes .......................................................................................... 5  The telecommunications access regime ........................................................................................ 6  The view of the regulator ......................................................................................................... 7  Revision of the telecommunications access regime ................................................................ 7  Structural separation as a solution? .............................................................................................. 8  OECD support for structural separation of Telstra ........................................................................ 9  Comments .................................................................................................................................... 10  Basis of policy commitment .............................................................................................................. 10  Timing of policy commitment ...................................................................................................... 12  Committee consideration ................................................................................................................. 12  Policy position of non‐government parties and independents ........................................................ 13  Coalition ....................................................................................................................................... 13  Senator Steve Fielding, Senator Nick Xenophon and the Australian Greens .............................. 13  Financial implications ............................................................................................................................. 14  Main issues ............................................................................................................................................. 14  Structural separation ........................................................................................................................ 14  ACCC oversight .................................................................................................................................. 14  Any consequences of failure to pass ................................................................................................ 16  Key provisions ........................................................................................................................................ 16  Part 1—amendments relating to Telstra .......................................................................................... 16  Structural separation ................................................................................................................... 16  Functional separation .................................................................................................................. 18  Part 2—telecommunications access regime .................................................................................... 19  Part 3—anti‐competitive conduct .................................................................................................... 20  Part 4—universal service regime ...................................................................................................... 21  Part 5—customer service guarantee ................................................................................................ 22 
    Date: 18/11/2010 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/369245 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: DALZELL, Brian - PYB...

  •     ISSN 1328‐8091  Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services BILLS DIGEST NO. 42, 2010-11  17 November 2010 Corporations Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2010  Sharon Scully and Mary Anne Neilsen  Law and Bills Digest Section  Contents  Re‐introduction of the Bill ........................................................................................................................ 2  Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 2  Background .............................................................................................................................................. 2  Access to company registers .............................................................................................................. 3  Committee consideration ........................................................................................................................ 5  Policy position of major stakeholders ...................................................................................................... 5  Financial implications ............................................................................................................................... 5  Key provisions .......................................................................................................................................... 6  ASIC and search warrants to seize documents ................................................................................... 6  Comment ....................................................................................................................................... 7  Access to company registers .............................................................................................................. 7  Comment ....................................................................................................................................... 9  The Aevum case ................................................................................................................................ 10  Comment ..................................................................................................................................... 11  Penalties for offences under Corporations Act ................................................................................ 11  Amendments to Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 .................................... 13  Comment ..................................................................................................................................... 13      2  Corporations Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2010    Corporations Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2010  Date introduced:  29 September 2010  House:  House of Representatives  Portfolio:  Treasury  Commencement:  sections 1-3: on Royal Assent; Schedule 1: on proclamation but, if any  provision does not commence within six months from Royal Assent, it commences on the  day after the end of that six month period.  Links: The links to the Bill, its Explanatory Memorandum and second reading speech can be found on  the Bills home page, or through http://www.aph.gov.au/bills/. When bills have been passed they can  be found at the ComLaw website, which is at http://www.comlaw.gov.au/.   Re‐introduction of the Bill  The Corporations Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2010 (the Bill) was first introduced on 24 June 2010 but 
    Date: 17/11/2010 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/366782 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: SCULLY, Sharon - NEI...

  • NOVEMBER 15, 2010 Australian report on Bisphenol A Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) has released its report on Bisphenol A (BPA) in food packaging and the risks to consumers. The compound BPA has a controversial history. It is suspected of being an endocrine disruptor (a chemical that mimics some
    Date: 15/11/2010 - Collection: Publications - ID: library/prspub/1040117 - Source: FlagPost - Author: BECKMANN, Roger

  •    BILLS DIGEST NO. 33, 2010-11  1 November 2010 Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2010 Measures No. 1) Bill 2010  This is a later edition of a Bills Digest previously prepared for the 42nd  Parliament    Rebecca de Boer  Social Policy Section    Sharon Scully  Law and Bills Digest Section  Contents  Re‐introduction of the Bill ........................................................................................................................ 2  Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 2  Summary of proposed amendments ....................................................................................................... 2  Committee consideration ........................................................................................................................ 4  Financial implications ............................................................................................................................... 5  Main provisions ........................................................................................................................................ 5  Schedule 1 - Exempting medical devices if substitutes are not widely available .............................. 5  Schedule 2, Part 1 - Amendments commencing the 28th day after Royal Assent ............................. 8  Schedule 2, Part 2 - Amendments commencing on the day after Royal Assent................................ 9  Recent amendments to the Bill ............................................................................................................. 11  Concluding comments ........................................................................................................................... 12        ISSN 1328‐8091  2  Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2010 Measures No. 1) Bill 2010     Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2010 Measures No. 1) Bill 2010 Date introduced:  30 September 2010  House:  House of Representatives  Portfolio:  Health and Ageing  Commencement:  Sections 1-3: on Royal Assent; Schedule 1 and Part 2 of Schedule 2: the  day after Royal Assent; Part 1 of Schedule 2: the 28th day after Royal Assent.  Links: The links to the Bill, its Explanatory Memorandum and second reading speech can be found on  the Bills page, or through http://www.aph.gov.au/bills/. When Bills have been passed they can be  found at ComLaw, which is at http://www.comlaw.gov.au/.  Re‐introduction of the Bill  The Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2010 Measures No. 1) Bill 2010 (the Bill) was first introduced 
    Date: 01/11/2010 - Collection: Bills and Legislation - ID: legislation/billsdgs/329008 - Source: Bills Digest Service - Author: DE BOER, Rebecca - S...

Summary results: 106-120 of 1144 matches.
Email List Link   Print List   RSS Feed
First Page Previous Page
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Next Page Last Page

For this page            
Top