Save Search

Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download PDFDownload PDF 

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment

NATION-BUILDING FUNDS BILL 2008E NATION-BUILDING FUNDS (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2008E COAG REFORM FUND BILL 2008

Order of the day read for the adjourned debate on the motion of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (Senator Evans)—That these bills be now read a second time.

Debate resumed.

Question put and passed.


Bills read a second time.

The Senate resolved itself into committee for the consideration of the bills.

In the committee

NATION-BUILDING FUNDS BILL 2008—

Bill taken as a whole by leave.

On the motion of Senator Milne, also on behalf of the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate (Senator Minchin), the following amendments, taken together by leave, were debated and agreed to:

 Clause 4, page 5 (after line 29), after the definition of COAG Reform Fund, insert:

   committee means the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building for the time being constituted under Part 2.5A.

committee member means a member of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building.

 Page 90 (after line 22), after Part 2.5, insert:

  

Part 2.5A—Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building

 

115A Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building

  (1) As soon as practicable after the commencement of the first session of each Parliament, a joint committee of members of the Parliament to be known as the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building is to be appointed according to the practice of the Parliament with reference to the appointment of members to serve on joint select committees of both Houses of the Parliament.

  (2) The committee must consist of 12 committee members, namely, 6 members of the Senate appointed by the Senate, at least one of whom is to be nominated by any minority group or groups or independent senator or independent senators, and 6 members of the House of Representatives appointed by that House, provided that there must not be more than 5 committee members in total from either the Government or the Opposition.

  (3) A member of the Parliament is not eligible for appointment as a committee member if he or she is:

 (a) a Minister;

 (b) the President of the Senate;

 (c) the Speaker of the House of Representatives; or

 (d) the Deputy-President and Chairman of Committees of the Senate or the Chairman of Committees of the House of Representatives.

  (4) A committee member ceases to hold office:

 (a) when the House of Representatives expires by effluxion of time or is dissolved;

 (b) if he or she becomes the holder of an office specified in any of the paragraphs of subsection (3);

 (c) if he or she ceases to be a member of the House of the Parliament by which he or she was appointed; or


 (d) if he or she resigns his or her office as provided by subsection (5) or (6).

  (5) A committee member appointed by the Senate may resign his or her office by writing signed by him or her and delivered to the President of the Senate.

  (6) A committee member appointed by the House of Representatives may resign his or her office by writing signed by him or her and delivered to the Speaker of that House.

  (7) Either House of the Parliament may appoint one of its members to fill a vacancy amongst the committee members appointed by that House.

   

115B Powers and proceedings of the committee

   All matters relating to the powers and proceedings of the committee must be determined by resolution of both Houses of the Parliament.

    

115C Duties of the committee

   The duties of the Committee are:

 (a) to consider Infrastructure Australia advice that is referred to the committee under section 119B;

 (b) to consider EIF Advisory Board advice that is referred to the committee under section 171A;

 (c) to consider HHF Advisory Board advice that is referred to the committee under section 246A;

 (d) to consider relevant Ministers' statements of reasons;

 (e) to report to both Houses of the Parliament, with such comments as it thinks fit, on any advice referred to it under paragraph (a), (b) or (c), and on any matter appertaining to or connected with that advice to which, in the opinion of the committee, the attention of the Parliament should be directed;

 (f) to examine each annual report on Infrastructure Australia and report to the Parliament on any matter appearing in, or arising out of, any such annual report;

 (g) to examine trends and changes in infrastructure provision and provision of education, health and hospital services and report to both Houses of the Parliament any change which the committee thinks desirable to:

 (i) the functions, structure and operations of Infrastructure Australia, the EIF Advisory Board or the HHF Advisory Board; or

 (ii) the operation of the Building Australia Fund, the Education Investment Fund or the Health and Hospitals Fund;

 (h) to inquire into any question in connection with its duties that is referred to it by either House of the Parliament, and to report to that House upon that question.


 Page 93 (after line 4), after clause 119, insert:

  

119A Infrastructure Australia advice to be tabled

   On receiving any advice prepared by Infrastructure Australia under subsection 116(1), 117(1), 118(1) or 119(1), the relevant Minister must cause a copy of the advice to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 3 sitting days of that House after the day on which he or she receives the advice.

 Page 93 (after line 4), after clause 119, insert:

  

119B Reference of advice of Infrastructure Australia to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building

  (1) If Infrastructure Australia provides advice in accordance with subsection 116(1), 117(1), 118(1) or 119(1) in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which exceeds the threshold amount, the advice and any document it considered when formulating that advice stands referred to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building for consideration and report.

  (2) If Infrastructure Australia provides advice in accordance with subsection 116(1), 117(1), 118(1) or 119(1) in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which does not exceed the threshold amount, the advice and any document it considered when formulating that advice must be provided to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building.

  (3) On receiving the advice of Infrastructure Australia in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which exceeds the threshold amount, the Minister must cause a copy of the advice to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 3 sitting days of that House after the day on which the Minister receives the advice, together with such plans, specifications and other particulars as the Minister thinks necessary.

  (4) Development of infrastructure which is the subject of advice that has been referred to the committee in accordance with this section must not commence before a report of the committee concerning the work has been presented to both Houses of the Parliament.

  (5) If, after a report of the committee in accordance with subsection (1) has been presented to both Houses of the Parliament and before the development of the infrastructure has commenced, each House resolves that, for reasons or purposes stated in the resolution, the advice of Infrastructure Australia is again referred to the committee for consideration and report, the committee must further consider the advice and the development of the infrastructure must not commence before a further report of the committee concerning the advice has been presented to both Houses.

  (6) In this section:

   estimated cost , in relation to the development of infrastructure, means an estimate of cost made when all the particulars of the development of the infrastructure substantially affecting its cost have been determined and includes the life-cycle costs of the infrastructure.


threshold amount means:

 (a) $50,000,000; or

 (b) if another lower amount is specified in the regulations for the purposes of this definition—that other amount.

 Clause 171, page 132 (after line 21), after subclause (4), insert:

  (4A) On receiving any advice prepared by the EIF Advisory Board under subsection (1) or (6), the relevant Minister must cause a copy of the advice to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 3 sitting days of that House after the day on which he or she receives the advice.

 Page 133 (after line 7), after clause 171, insert:

  

171A Reference of advice of EIF Board to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building

  (1) If the EIF Advisory Board provides advice in accordance with subsection 171(1) or (6) in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which exceeds the threshold amount, the advice and any document it considered when formulating that advice stands referred to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building for consideration and report.

  (2) If the EIF Advisory Board provides advice in accordance with subsection 171(1) or (6) in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which does not exceed the threshold amount, the advice and any document it considered when formulating that advice must be provided to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building.

  (3) On receiving the advice of the EIF Advisory Board in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which exceeds the threshold amount, the Minister must cause a copy of the advice to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 3 sitting days of that House after the day on which the Minister receives the advice, together with such plans, specifications and other particulars as the Minister thinks necessary.

  (4) Development of infrastructure which is the subject of advice that has been referred to the committee in accordance with this section must not commence before a report of the committee concerning the work has been presented to both Houses of the Parliament.

  (5) If, after a report of the committee in accordance with subsection (1) has been presented to both Houses of the Parliament and before the development of the infrastructure has commenced, each House resolves that, for reasons or purposes stated in the resolution, the advice of the EIF Advisory Board is again referred to the committee for consideration and report, the committee must further consider the advice and the development of the infrastructure must not commence before a further report of the committee concerning the advice has been presented to both Houses.


  (6) In this section:

   estimated cost , in relation to the development of infrastructure, means an estimate of cost made when all the particulars of the development of the infrastructure substantially affecting its cost have been determined and includes the life-cycle costs of the infrastructure.

threshold amount means:

 (a) $50,000,000; or

 (b) if another lower amount is specified in the regulations for the purposes of this definition—that other amount.

 Clause 246, page 186 (after line 8), at the end of the clause, add:

  (3) On receiving any advice prepared by the HHF Advisory Board under subsection (1), the Health Minister must cause a copy of the advice to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 3 sitting days of that House after the day on which he or she receives the advice.

 Page 186 (after line 8), after clause 246, insert:

  

246A Reference of advice of HHF Board to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building

  (1) If the HHF Advisory Board provides advice in accordance with subsection 246(1) in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which exceeds the threshold amount, the advice and any document it considered when formulating that advice stands referred to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building for consideration and report.

  (2) If the HHF Advisory Board provides advice in accordance with subsection 246(1) in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which does not exceed the threshold amount, the advice and any document it considered when formulating that advice must be provided to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Nation-Building.

  (3) On receiving the advice of the HHF Advisory Board in support of infrastructure the estimated cost of which exceeds the threshold amount, the Minister must cause a copy of the advice to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 3 sitting days of that House after the day on which the Minister receives the advice, together with such plans, specifications and other particulars as the Minister thinks necessary.

  (4) Development of infrastructure which is the subject of advice that has been referred to the committee in accordance with this section must not commence before a report of the committee concerning the work has been presented to both Houses of the Parliament.

  (5) If, after a report of the committee in accordance with subsection (1) has been presented to both Houses of the Parliament and before the development of the infrastructure has commenced, each House resolves that, for reasons or purposes stated in the resolution, the advice of the HHF Advisory Board is again referred to the committee for consideration and report, the committee must further consider the advice and the development of the infrastructure must not commence before a further report of the committee concerning the advice has been presented to both Houses.


  (6) In this section:

   estimated cost , in relation to the development of infrastructure, means an estimate of cost made when all the particulars of the development of the infrastructure substantially affecting its cost have been determined and includes the life-cycle costs of the infrastructure.

threshold amount means:

 (a) $50,000,000; or

 (b) if another lower amount is specified in the regulations for the purposes of this definition—that other amount.

On the motion of Senator Minchin the following amendments, taken together by leave, were debated and agreed to:

 Clause 52, page 47 (after line 7), after subclause (3), insert:

  (3A) If the Infrastructure Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Infrastructure Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 52, page 47 (after line 23), after subclause (6), insert:

  (6A) If the Communications Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment, the Communications Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 52, page 47 (after line 27), after subclause (7), insert:

  (7A) If the Communications Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (7) in relation to a payment, the Communications Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 52, page 48 (after line 11), after subclause (10), insert:

  (10A) If the Energy Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (8) in relation to a payment, the Energy Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 52, page 48 (after line 26), at the end of the clause, add:

  (14) If the Water Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (11) in relation to a payment, the Water Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 64, page 55 (after line 24), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Infrastructure Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Infrastructure Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.


 Clause 71, page 60 (after line 8), after subclause (3), insert:

  (3A) If the Communications Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Communications Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 78, page 63 (after line 23), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Energy Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Energy Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 85, page 67 (after line 23), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Water Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Water Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 90, page 71 (after line 16), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Infrastructure Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Infrastructure Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 95, page 74 (after line 19), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Communications Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Communications Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 100, page 77 (after line 25), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Energy Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Energy Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 105, page 80 (after line 29), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Water Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Water Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 177, page 136 (after line 10), after subclause (3), insert:

  (3A) If the Education Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Education Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.


 Clause 177, page 136 (after line 26), after subclause (6), insert:

  (6A) If the Research Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment, the Research Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 177, page 137 (after line 10), at the end of the clause, add:

  (10) If the EIF designated Ministers make a recommendation under subsection (7) in relation to a payment, the EIF designated Ministers must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 184, page 141 (after line 20), after subclause (3), insert:

  (3A) If the Education Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Education Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 184, page 142 (after line 2), at the end of the clause, add:

  (7) If the EIF designated Ministers make a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment, the EIF designated Ministers must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 191, page 146 (after line 2), after subclause (3), insert:

  (3A) If the Research Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Research Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 191, page 146 (after line 18), at the end of the clause, add:

  (7) If the EIF designated Ministers make a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment, the EIF designated Ministers must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 195, page 149 (after line 16), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Education Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Education Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 252, page 188 (after line 24), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Health Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Health Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.


 Clause 258, page 191 (after line 23), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Health Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Health Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

 Clause 263, page 195 (after line 9), at the end of the clause, add:

  (4) If the Health Minister makes a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment, the Health Minister must cause a written statement of reasons for the recommendation to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 9 sitting days of that House.

On the motion of Senator Minchin the following amendments, taken together by leave, were debated and agreed to:

 Clause 52, page 46 (lines 26 to 29), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Infrastructure Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 116 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 52, page 47 (lines 12 to 15), omit subclause (5), substitute:

  (5) The Communications Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 117 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 52, page 48 (lines 1 to 4), omit subclause (9), substitute:

  (9) The Energy Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (8) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 118 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 52, page 48 (lines 16 to 19), omit subclause (12), substitute:

  (12) The Water Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (11) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 119 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and


 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 64, page 55 (lines 14 to 17), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Infrastructure Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 116 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 71, page 59 (lines 27 to 30), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Communications Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 117 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 78, page 63 (lines 13 to 16), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Energy Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 118 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 85, page 67 (lines 13 to 16), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Water Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 119 that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.


 Clause 90, page 71 (lines 6 to 9), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Infrastructure Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a grant unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 116 that:

 (a) the grant satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the grant will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the grant will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 95, page 74 (lines 9 to 12), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Communications Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a grant unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 117 that:

 (a) the grant satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the grant will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the grant will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 100, page 77 (lines 15 to 18), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Energy Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a grant unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 118 that:

 (a) the grant satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the grant will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the grant will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 105, page 80 (lines 19 to 22), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Water Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a grant unless Infrastructure Australia has advised under section 119 that:

 (a) the grant satisfies the relevant BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the grant will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the grant will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 177, page 135 (line 27) to page 136 (line 2), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Education Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 171(1)(a) that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant EIF evaluation criteria; and


 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 177, page 136 (lines 15 to 18), omit subclause (5), substitute:

  (5) The Research Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 171(1)(b) that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant EIF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 177, page 136 (line 31) to page 137 (line 2), omit subclause (8), substitute:

  (8) The EIF designated Ministers must not make a recommendation under subsection (7) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has:

 (a) given advice under subsection 171(6) about the payment; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—advised that the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) advised that the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 184, page 141 (lines 9 to 12), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Education Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 171(1)(a) that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant EIF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 184, page 141 (lines 25 to 28), omit subclause (5), substitute:

  (5) The EIF designated Ministers must not make a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has:

 (a) given advice under subsection 171(6) about the payment; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—advised that the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) advised that the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.


 Clause 191, page 145 (lines 22 to 25), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Research Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 171(1)(b) that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant EIF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 191, page 146 (lines 7 to 10), omit subclause (5), substitute:

  (5) The EIF designated Ministers must not make a recommendation under subsection (4) in relation to a payment unless the EIF Advisory Board has:

 (a) given advice under subsection 171(6) about the payment; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—advised that the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) advised that the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 195, page 149 (lines 5 to 8), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Education Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a grant unless the EIF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 171(1)(a) that:

 (a) the grant satisfies the relevant EIF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the grant will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the grant will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 252, page 188 (lines 13 to 16), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Health Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless the HHF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 246(1)(a) that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant HHF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 258, page 191 (lines 12 to 15), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Health Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a payment unless the HHF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 246(1)(a) that:

 (a) the payment satisfies the relevant HHF evaluation criteria; and


 (b) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the payment will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 263, page 194 (line 29) to page 195 (line 2), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) The Health Minister must not make a recommendation under subsection (1) in relation to a grant unless the HHF Advisory Board has advised under paragraph 246(1)(a) that:

 (a) the grant satisfies the relevant HHF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) if the grant will result in the creation or development of an asset—the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (c) the grant will not be made in relation to a project that requires the payment of an upfront fee.

On the motion of Senator Minchin the following amendments, taken together by leave, were debated and agreed to:

 Clause 14, page 18 (lines 23 to 26), omit subclauses (4) and (5), substitute:

  (4) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

 Clause 15, page 19 (lines 10 to 12), omit subclause (3), substitute:

  (3) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

 Clause 17, page 20 (lines 3 to 5), omit subclause (3), substitute:

  (3) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

 Clause 133, page 103 (lines 22 to 25), omit subclauses (4) and (5), substitute:

  (4) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

 Clause 134, page 104 (lines 8 to 10), omit subclause (3), substitute:

  (3) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

 Clause 216, page 164 (lines 17 to 20), omit subclauses (4) and (5), substitute:

  (4) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

 Clause 217, page 165 (lines 3 to 5), omit subclause (3), substitute:

  (3) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

On the motion of Senator Minchin the following amendments, taken together by leave, were debated and agreed to:

 Clause 4, page 6 (after line 2), after the definition of Communications Minister, insert:

   Competitive Neutrality Guidelines means the Australian Government Competitive Neutrality Guidelines for Managers contained in Finance Management Guidance No. 9, published by the Department of Finance and Deregulation, as in force from time to time.

 Clause 116, page 91 (lines 11 and 12), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) In giving advice under subsection (1), Infrastructure Australia must:

 (a) apply the BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) apply the Competitive Neutrality Guidelines, if applicable; and


 (c) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—take into account whether the owners of the asset will meet all the whole-of-life asset costs, including operational costs; and

 (d) take into account whether or not the project will require the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 117, page 91 (lines 23 and 24), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) In giving advice under subsection (1), Infrastructure Australia must:

 (a) apply the BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) apply the Competitive Neutrality Guidelines, if applicable; and

 (c) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—take into account whether or not the owner or owners of the asset will pay the whole-of-life costs; and

 (d) take into account whether or not the project will require the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 118, page 92 (lines 11 and 12), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) In giving advice under subsection (1), Infrastructure Australia must:

 (a) apply the BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) apply the Competitive Neutrality Guidelines, if applicable; and

 (c) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—take into account whether or not the owner or owners of the asset will pay the whole-of-life costs; and

 (d) take into account whether or not the project will require the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 119, page 92 (lines 27 and 28), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) In giving advice under subsection (1), Infrastructure Australia must:

 (a) apply the BAF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) apply the Competitive Neutrality Guidelines, if applicable; and

 (c) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—take into account whether or not the owner or owners of the asset will pay the whole-of-life costs; and

 (d) take into account whether or not the project will require the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 171, page 132 (lines 20 and 21), omit subclause (4), substitute:

  (4) In giving advice under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), the EIF Advisory Board must:

 (a) apply the EIF evaluation criteria; and

 (b) apply the Competitive Neutrality Guidelines, if applicable; and

 (c) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—take into account whether or not the owner or owners of the asset will pay the whole-of-life costs; and

 (d) take into account whether or not the project will require the payment of an upfront fee.

 Clause 246, page 186 (lines 7 and 8), omit subclause (2), substitute:

  (2) In giving advice under paragraph (1)(a), the HHF Advisory Board must:

 (a) apply the HHF evaluation criteria; and


 (b) apply the Competitive Neutrality Guidelines, if applicable; and

 (c) if the payment will result in the creation or development of an asset—take into account whether or not the owner or owners of the asset will pay the whole-of-life costs; and

 (d) take into account whether or not the project will require the payment of an upfront fee.

Senator Minchin moved the following amendments together by leave:

 Clause 11, page 15 (lines 10 and 11), omit:

 The balance of the Communications Fund is to be transferred to the Building Australia Fund.

 Clause 11, page 16 (lines 12 to 14), omit note 1.

 Clause 14, page 18 (lines 15 to 18), omit notes 1 and 2.

 Clause 19, page 23 (lines 1 to 7), omit paragraph (b).

 Clause 19, page 23 (lines 13 to 17), omit paragraph (d).

 Clause 19, page 23 (lines 20 to 22), omit note 2.

Debate ensued.

Question—That the amendments be agreed to—put.

The committee divided—

AYES,34


Senators—
AbetzCoonanHeffernanParry
BarnettCormannHumphriesPayne
BernardiEgglestonJoyceScullion
BirminghamEllisonKrogerTroeth
BoswellFergusonMacdonaldTrood
BrandisFieldingMasonWilliams (Teller)
BushbyFierravanti-WellsMcGauranXenophon
CashFifieldMinchin
ColbeckFisherNash

NOES, 32


Senators—
BilykEvansHurleyMilne
BishopFarrellHutchinsMoore
Brown, BobFaulknerLudlamPratt
Brown, CarolFeeneyLudwigSherry
CameronForshawLundySiewert
CollinsFurnerMarshallStephens
ConroyHanson-YoungMcEwen (Teller)Sterle
CrossinHoggMcLucasWortley

Question agreed to.

Question—That the bill, as amended, be agreed to—divided in respect of clauses 16 and 33.

Question—That clauses 16 and 33 stand as printed—put and negatived.


Senator Milne moved the following amendment:

 Page 2 (after line 12), after clause 2, insert:

  

2A Principles of Nation-building Funds

  (1) The underlying principles of the Nation-building Funds established by this or any other Act are that projects financed from the Funds must:

 (a) address national infrastructure priorities;

 (b) demonstrate high benefits and effective use of resources;

 (c) address climate change mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity conservation;

 (d) prepare for the global oil production peak and subsequent decline in oil production;

 (e) efficiently address infrastructure needs;

 (f) demonstrate achievement of established standards in implementation and management.

Debate ensued.

At 2 pm: The President resumed the chair and the Chair of Committees (Senator Ferguson) reported progress.