Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Electorate talk - wheat to China

Download PDFDownload PDF


C A N B E R R A , A C T . 2 6 0 0

T E L 72 1211


EliBARGO: Sunday, 28 October, 1973.


I do not think any Australian likes double standards.

There was an example of a double standard a short while ago.

The Prime Minister attacked General Motors Holden for having appointed an American to be the Chief Executive Officer

of that Company in Australia. . The view was' very strongly

put that an Australian ought to be chosen.

In broad terms 1.would support that view, I ’was all

the more surprised, therefore, to find the Prime Minister

announcing that a Canadian was being appointed to head the

Australian Department of Transport. The person who has been appointed probably has many qualifications and many .

good ones, but if the Government-wants to criticise the

appointment of an American to head General Motors, how can ' it appoint a Canadian to head one of its own Departments,.

Earlier this month Jim Cairns, the Minister for Overseas

Trade, announced a 3-year agreement for the sale of wheat

to China, The agreement was for something between

4.0 to 4»7 million tons over 3 years - that is equivalent

to a little over 170 million bushels over the 3 years.

At present world prices that 170 million bushels would

be worth $600 million. Unfortunately this agreement is not as firm as it sounds, because the -price has only been

negotiated for the first instalment, and whether or not a

sale will in fact take place in the future will depend upon

whether China and the Australian V/heat Board can agrees on

price. ' '



The first sales have actually been negotiated, and are

around 51 «50 nor bushel and are worth about 380 million. The plainlv Chinese expect world prices of wneat to fall, because the price for the be.lance of the first year1s commitment of

l o l million tons is not to be negotiated until June next

yearo The agreement is unfortunately a fairly loose one and whether it advantages wheat growers or not will depend

upon the price actually to be negotiated in the latter period of the agreement. At this stage there is certainly no

firm commitment. . - -

Last week a Censure Motion was moved against the Government by Mr. Snedden, Leader of the Opposition. ■ The

Prime Minister replied and then "went off to Albury to sign an agreement with the Victorian and New South Vales Premiers.

This was no doubt an important occasion, but 1 asked the

Parliamentary Library to do a little research and on the . information given to was the first time a Prime Minisibr

had been absent from the Parliament while a Censure Motion

was still under debate, and the first time a Prime Minister^

had left before the vote' had been taken. '

' These Censure Motions are predictable in that the votes

are nearly always on Party lines, but the.y do provide an

opportunity for the Opposition to attack and to criticise the Government and for the Government to defend its policies.

It is all part of the process of Parliament and of public

education. · · .

1 do not really believe the main charges of the . '

Opposition were answered. Inflation is running at nearly 15 percent and the Government has not yet done anything that

will stop it. The Government has increased interest rates to · the highest level for 100 years, causing a good deal of ·

hardship and difficulty to many people especially to those

trying to save to buy their first home. V/e all know last

year we were promised low interest rates ~ down to 5 percent -

what is your overdraft now, 3 percent, 9 percent or 10 percent ?

The Government has of course put itself in this position

by.refusing to use the instruments of economic control

properly and adequately. - It is seeking powers.over

incomes and prices leading people to believe that this will

enable the Government to control .inflation - it won't unless the fires that keep the pressures burning are put out,

Last week the Minister for Labour said that he wanted to

see quarterly cost of adjustments to wage rates re-introduced,

I wonder if the Minister had read the judgement of the

Conciliation and Arbitration Commission when they abandoned

quarterly adjustments in .1952/53» The Court pointed out that it had stopped relating the basic wage merely to a basic

standard of needs, as was the case in the .Harvester Award.

The Court said that since 1950 'the basic wage was based on .

economic capacity to pay, which was quite a different concept leading to a higher "wage, The wage was thus fixed at the .

highest level that the Commission thought the economy could bear, . ■ ' ^

Because it was based on the economic capacity to pay, the Court said there was no justification for maintaining quarterly

adjustments, . It went on to say that the quarterly adjustments

had been an accelerating factor in the rapid increase in .

prices and inflation, and the Court strongly rejected any

opinions to the contrary that had been given to it.

The Court pointed out that the frequency and inpracticability

of price and wage changes makes the planning of business or financial transactions very difficult indeed. For example,■

builders would, be in a difficult position giving a firm .

contract price.

The Minister proposes to return to the system which the

Court dismissed in 1952/55». -In the present inflationary dircumstances the Minister's proposals would only make inflation worse with consequent harm to families right throughout Australia,

I would suggest that since the amalgamation of the basic wage with margins resulting in the minimum wage concept of .

196/, there is even less justification for a return to

quarterly adjustments, .


Prime Minister's Humbug . ' '

The Prime Minister is asking for powers that would. . allow the Commonwealth to control all incomes and all prices„

Last week he was asked how he would use the incomes power.

It is worth-noting that every example he gave was inflationary.

Thus, he is asking for powers which he says will help him to curb inflation, but he is proposing to use the incomes

power in an inflationary manner.

• For examples he said that he could use the incomes power to make' periodic adjustments to wages and salaries

compulsory. As the Arbitration Commission explained so clearly in its case concerning quarterly adjustments, this

would add strongly to the upward spiral of wages and prices.

The Prime Minister's humbug must be plain to everyone but himself. . ■ '

. 1