Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Address to the national Greek union of Australian students

Download PDFDownload PDF




Address by B i l l Hayden , H P , ,

Leader of the Opposition

the National Union of Greek.Australian Students

Union Theatre

University of Melbourne

Sunday, 9 S e p t e m b e r , 1979 .

3.00 p . m .


I greatly value this opportunity to speak you. I know that your main concern at this Conference has been the future direction of the Greek community of Australia.

That, of course, is something for Greek Australians to s e t t l e and I would not presume to encroach upon such a debate. I am aware, though, of the issues that prompt such a debate at this time and I'd like to deal with some of them today. Few Australians, irrespective of their

background, have escaped the e ff e c t s of the policies dictated from Canberra in the past few years.

But there is a depressing, and constantly growing catalogue of instances to show that the burdens of such policies f a l l disproportionately on people from a non-English speaking background. .

That in ju stice that no national Government in Australia should tolerate. I assure you emphatically that the next Labor Government will not tolerate i t .

Far too many of the programs that are supposed to be correcting this imbalance are l i t t l e more than public relations exercises. It might sound impressive to say that $50 million is being provided over three years to fund the Galbally recommendations on post-arrival se rvices.

But look at i t in perspective. .

It amounts to spending about 10 cents a week on each person concerned.

It compares with $60 million reaped by the Government over the. same three years by abolishing the tax rebate for overseas dependents.

And on the scale, of Government spending p r io ritie s i t ranks below the $40 million being spent over two years on the Prime Minister's VIP . aircraft.

There's a l o t of good sense in the Galbally Report but i t ' s sheer humbug for the Government to i n s i s t that i t ' s being implemented in full and, therefore.,, the full Government responsibility is discharged. .

For a ' s t a r t, there is quite unjustified delay in implementing certain. ■ ·. of the Galbally recommendations, because, of bureaucratic infighting. ·" " : -Even more important, however, is the fact that the whole scale of the report has been overtaken by events. .

The Galbally recommendations were based on a net intake of 50,000 immigrants and 9,000 refugees. .

But now the migrant intake is up to 70,000 a year with a proposal that i t be raised further to 87,000, and the refugee figure has risen to 14,000 a year.

This can only mean that the funding, geared to the original", lower levels is to ta lly inadequate.

-2 -

And in addition to that, of course, the different composition of the totals - - especially the sharp increase in the number of

arrivals from Indo-China - - raised a need for a whole new range of s k i l l s and services.

All of this simply underlines the point that in the past four years there has been a progressive worsening of the position of some of the people in the community who were already in a disadvantaged position. . .

The recent Budget will widen this pattern sign ifican tly. By the time i t has run i t s course, the great majority of Australian families will find themselves noticeably worse o ff.

An average single-income family of four will be about $7.90 a*week worse o f f through the overall impact of the Budget. .

The Prime Minister also has a curious sense of justice about where the burden of tax changes should f a l l .

Under this Budget, the family really battling to get by on $160 a week w ill be hit by a tax increase over the year of 28 per cent.

I f they're lucky enough to be up at the level of average weekly earnings, about $232 a week, the tax increase is 16 per cent.

But for someone at the salary level of the Prime Minister — about $1,600 a week — taxation will rise by only 10 per cent.

That's the e f f e c t of things that i t will do. But to make a r e a l i s t i c

judgment, one must also look at the things this Budget won't do.

For example, i t won't increase family allowance. They've been frozen since 1976 when they were introduced.

That means that, compared with the previous system of tax rebates _ and child endowment, a family of four has lo s t $6.54.a week. And i f the bread-winner in that family happens to be unemployed, the position is l i t t l e less than disastrous.

In that situation , that family, would have to live on $112.20 a week — that's the married rate unemployment benefit, plus the dependents . . ~ allowance and family allowance. . ·. . ._. .· . · ’ -

Now $112 a week is about $120 less than average weekly earnings and more than $18 below the poverty,line calculated at June this year.

But the story doesn't end there. .

Look at petrol prices. Petrol cost 70 cents a gallon in November, 1975. Now i t ' s $1.40 a gallon. To an average family that probably represents an extra $6.30 a week.

In the past year, the basic shopping l i s t for a family of four has

increased in cost by well over $6.00.

. . . / 3

- 3 -

For a great many families the question of health insurance has become a nightmare.

There are still.more than 620,000 people on unemployment, sickness and special benefits, and their dependents, who are excluded from the bulk-billing arrangements by which the Government pays 85 per cent of doctors' b i l l s .

But apart from that, the destruction of effectiv e general health cover is striking more and more at the most acutely disadvantaged families in our community.

A quarter of all the families existing at around poverty level are currently paying for medical and hospital insurance they can't really afford. .. ~ ■ -

But now, to give themselves that measure of security, they're having to pay an extra $759 a year for full medical cover.

At the other end of the scale, of course, the wealthy, who also know the system better, are opting out of insurance and claiming all their health costs against tax.

That's just a brief survey of one perspective on the Budget. The hardship i t will wreak on so many people can be viewed from all sorts of other angles.

One is the extraordinary combination of measures that will lead to 50,000 to 60,000 more people joining the ranks of the unemployed while, at the same time, funds for job training are slashed by $27 million.

Now, I suppose i t would be fair question for an observer o f these proceedings today to ask, "W hy is Hayden injecting a discussion of the l a t e s t Budget into a conference on the future direction of Greek community a c tivity in Australia?"

I'm happy to respond. . .

I t ' s because the whole basis of what you're talking about, and what I'm talking about is a concern for people.

The-overwhelming majority of families in Australia will, suffer ..from . .. this;Budget. ,'. ' V: : v · ; - W' V. . ; ; . '-.Λ

• I fear, i t will be f e l t particularly by those of a southern European' . background, where the' culture of the extended family provides a bond and strength of such great importance.

I have called this an anti-family Budget and I believe strongly that the description is warranted. . .

In my view, these are not the signs of a Government with a proper humanitarian concern. .

The single-minded pursuit of an 'in fla tio n f i r s t ' policy, without proper regard for the e ffe cts on so many people is destructive and dangerous for our future. . ,

. . . / 4

- 4 -

The seeds of social discord and alientation which are being sown now are lik e ly to produce lethal fruits i f they are allowed to keep growing. . . .

Some would say that the early crop is already with us — that the increased incidence of certain types of crime, of drug abuse, even suicide can be attributed, at least in part, to the social

circumstances flowing from economic recession.

The Australian Labor Party has a continuous tradition of basing i t s p o licies on concern for people.

In the present Federal Parliament, we are able to combine that tradition with an outstanding team — . i f I may say so - - of

economic talent. ■ - *

I can assure you that in the next Labor Government that team will do things very differently.

I t is_ possible to fight inflation and simultaneously generate a ' higher level of economic a c tiv it y , more jobs and greater confidence. .

Until this is accepted and we move away from blinkered ideological approaches — which are f a i li n g , anyway — the injustices and inequalities in our society will only worsen.

The types of communities represented here today, and comparable ones around the country, suffer.some of the worst e ffe cts o f these injustices and inequalities.

The 1975 Poverty survey disclosed that the rate of poverty among non- English speaking se ttle rs was twice that of the general Australian community.

Australian men of Southern European extraction are engaged in manufacturing industry at a rate 2 to 7 h times that of Australian-born workers and i t i s manufacturing which has been most depressed by the Government's economic p o l i c i e s . ’

Workers in that sector are obviously e s pe ci ally vulnerable to retrenchment because of Government p o l i c i e s . '

Immigrant teenagers have the highest unemployment rate after Aborigines.

The percentage of non-English speaking migrants in low status manual' " occupations i s higher than their proportion in the population, and th e i r concentration in low sk i l l e d and labouring occupations has persisted over many years.

This indicates that they have not been able to achieve any marked degree of occupational mobility.

Non-English speaking families have a far tougher struggle se ttin g up home. They generally pay higher rants and repayments than the Australian average although their income is some $20-$40 a week l e s s than Australian born or English-speaking migrant fami lies . .

. . . / 5

- 5 -

One in three migrant students is in need of remedial assistance and one in ten is unable to understand English. About every second 10-14 year old f a i l s in reading tests to show that they have mastered the language.

Despite the Government's publicity efforts proclaiming the contrary, i t is an undeniable fact that non-English speaking s e t t le r s are faring poorly in Australia.

Compared with their needs they are victims of enormous Government neglect.

They are s t i l l treated very much as grist for the mills of industry rather than as self-respecting individuals entitled to the maximum - of dignity and se lf-relia nce.

This discrimination must end: i t is a s lig h t on Australia. .

And i t is just not good enough to keep saying that questions like this must be deferred because of a chosen approach to economic management — an approach which, as I've pointed out, i s n ' t working, anyway!

Most of you will be familiar with the increasing e ffects of this approach in the f ield of education, particularly perhaps, with the Tertiary Education Assistance Scheme — TEAS, as i t ' s known.

Under the la s t Labor Government, students could receive up to $1,500 from private sources without affecting their entitlements and they could work during the summer vacation without affecting their means test.

Now, as you would know, those earnings do affect the means te s t.

W e allowed students to receive up to $600 from another award without . their TEAS entitlement being affects. That amount's been reduced to $150. .

The minimum allowance payable has been increased from $50 to $300. That means that all those students who would have qualified for some amount of assistance up to $300 will now get nothing, r > · '. · ■ . ·

The present maximum level, of TEAS is $45.T5 : that i s ,. $24.35. below the poverty line. ' . ' ··' V ; .

When we take inflation into account a student living away from home on TEAS is now over $10 a week worse o ff than he was four years ago.

The only study I know of on the effectiveness of TEAS was in this university. And i t showed that the total cost for a student living away from home in shared accommodation was $1,300 more than the maximum available under TEAS. .

The cost of residential accommodation on campus was $664 above the TEAS maximum. .

.. ./ 6

- 6 -


I n a d d i t i o n t o pr o bl e ms l i k e t h e s e , w e ' r e . a c c u m u l a t i n g s e r i o u s l o n g e r t e r m d e f i c i e n c i e s i n c a p i t a l g r a n t s .

The T e r t i a r y E d u c a t i o n Commi s s i on has p o i n t e d o u t :

"Me as ur e d i n c o n s t a n t December 1977 p r i c e s , t h e c o mbi ne d c a p i t a l program f o r t h e t h r e e s e c t o r s o f t e r t i a r y e d u c a t i o n has f a l l e n f rom $221 m i l l i o n i n 1975 t o $13 7 m i l l i o n i n 1 9 7 8 ".

F u r t h e r , " t h e r e a l v a l u e o f t h e Commonweal t h' s c a p i t a l program has be e n r e d u c e d by n e a r l y 40% i n t h e s p a c e o f 3 y e a r s " .

The u r g e n c y o f p r o v i s i o n o f f u n d s f o r c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s has i n c r e a s e d o v e r t i me .

P r o j e c t s i n c l u d e b u i l d i n g s f o r a pp r o v e d d e v e l o p me n t s wh i c h ha v e be e n unde rway f o r s e v e r a l y e a r s , p r o j e c t s t o c a t c h up on s u b s t a n t i a l b a c k l o g s o f ac c o mmo da t i o n o c c u r r i n g a s a r e s u l t o f t h e r a p i d e x p a n s i o n

i n numbers i n p a r t i c u l a r u n i v e r s i t i e s .......... p r o j e c t s , t o r e p l a c e

o b s o l e t e f a c i l i t i e s a n d , i n t h e c a s e o f some i n s t i t u t i o n s ,

e x p e n d i t u r e t o c o n c e n t r a t e a c t i v i t i e s on f e v / e r s i t e s . . .

The Commi s s i on t h u s c o n c l u d e d t h a t " s i g n i f i c a n t e x p e n d i t u r e on ma j o r new b u i l d i n g s w i l l be r e q u i r e d i n t h e u n i v e r s i t y s e c t o r f o r some t i me t o come , and i t s u p p o r t s t h e r e s u mp t i o n o f a r e l a t i v e l y mo d e s t new wor ks pr o g r a m". ·

I n s t e a d o f a c a p i t a l wor ks r e s u mp t i o n , t h e F r a s e r Gover nme nt c u t bac k e x i s t i n g g r a n t s e v e n f u r t h e r .

Now, I am a f i r m b e l i e v e r i n t h e ne e d f o r Gove r nme nt s t o d a y t o be d i s c i p l i n e d i n t h e i r appr o a c h t o s p e n d i n g . .

But we s h o u t i n ' t be s t u p i d a b o u t i t !

We ne e d s o me t h i n g a l i t t l e be yond t h e p i g g y - b a n k m e n t a l i t y .

The p e r s i s t e n t d e f e r r a l o f c l e a r l y - r e c o g n i s e d o b l i g a t i o n s o n l y compound t h e p r o b l e m . , . . .. . . ·' ·â– ·. ··"·"■■

It solves nothing and means only that.r esponsibility is being neglected.

In this case, the.price is paid by the current generation-of students.

Make no mistake about i t .

I f neglect is allowed to erode the quality of training available in the education system, then eventually the status of those i t produces will be progress!vely su llied .

There is no sense in forcing some areas of Government resp onsib ility to be the s a c r i f i c i a l offerings for a rigid outlook on economic -

management. .

. . . / 7

- 7 -

Real p r iorities have to be sorted out, including the capital works needs of education. .

Mr. Chairman, in the light of all the circumstances I have been describing, I am bound to say to an audience like this that the next Labor Government would have to be extremely cautious about any proposal to raise the general level of immigration.

I believe i t would be imperative to exercise caution i f there was the risk that a high proportion of new s e ttle r s would be unemployed or, in any other way, forced to suffer hardship.

Our policy on this subject and the wider matter of community relations was thoroughly reviewed at our recent National Conference in Adelaide, and I noticed a few comments in Greek and Italian language newspapers c r it ic is in g our attitude to immigration targets. * ■

I hope our position is not misunderstood. -

I think our policy.represents a balanced, sensible and humanitarian approach at a time of serious economic d if f ic u lt y .

When we take government, Labor will establish a National Population Council, with i t s membership drawn from a wide range of community interests - - demographic, economic, environmental, industrial and social. ,

W e will, want the Council to make balanced judgments upon the relationship between population growth, immigration, the economy * the environment and the quality of l i f e .

I believe that with advice of this sort available to i t , a Labor

Government would be able to make very considerable improvements in settlement and education services.

W e would certainly avoid the types of situation I described earlier where a series of unco-ordinated decisions wrecked the painstaking work of a committee of inquiry. .

W e would also direct the National Population Council to review the NUM AS system of immigrant selection - - that stands for Numerical Multifactor Assessment System, i f there should be anyone present who's not familiar with the acronym.. ' · ; .;Λ;\ :· . -r ·' .

, NUMAS, as i t ' s presently structured, is downgrading the importance, of · . family reunion as a criterion for entry, and we're'not prepared to . accept that. ' .

Labor believes that family reunion must have a high priority and we would seek a new series of weighting factors from the National Population Council.

There are, in fa ct, several aspects of NUM AS that n^ed change. I do not agree with i t s requirement of maintenance guarantees for family reunion sponsored by Australian residents. ■

Labor has decided as a matter of firm policy that we will remove that requirement. .

- 8 -

I think there is some evidence, too, that NLIM AS is creating a . situation in c o n flic t with our policy declaration which says:

A Labor Government wi l l not discriminate in the immigration policy or any other areas'of. policy on the grounds of race, nationality, p o l i t i c s , sex or creed.

This is a fundamental declaration of principle. I t ' s a l i t t l e

early y e t to draw firm conclusions but s t a t i s t i c s on immigration since NUM AS came into force suggest that i t does have an inbuilt bias. ,

W e don't want to enshrine a system which is biased towards rich, white, English-speaking, middle^class conservatives — and ‘that is what the early figures are suggesting about. NUMAS.

As a support for our proposed National Population Council, a Labor Government wi l l establish consultative machinery between the States and the Federal Government to determine the appropriate level of immigration intake, and of Federal financial support to ensure that

the States can provide adequate f a c i l i t i e s , services and opportunities for all new s e t t l e r s .

I'm confident that this new machinery wi l l give greater coherence, . relevance and effectiveness to policy, decisions, for the benefit of all the people concerned.

W e have also adopted a declaration which says this:

There shall be no distinction between Australian .

. c i t i z e n s , whether born in Australia or overseas,

in leg a l, social or p o litic a l rights.

Regrettably, there have been instances where distinctions do seem to have been drawn between Australian-born and overseas-born c it iz e n s .

I would c i t e particularly the cases of alleged social security fraud raised against Greek Australians in Sydney l a s t year.

W e have ventilated detai ls of this a ffair many timesin the Federal Parliament without receiving adequate explanation —. or even - . adequate response, for that, matter. .. . "·> ..'· ..

W e believe that the conduct of this matter and the nature of the charges have been such as to give rise to a feelin g among t h e s e .. Australian citize ns that they have been singled out for special treatment because of their Greek backgrounds.

If that i s so, i t i s wrong. It is offensive. It must not be allowed

to recur. ^

There must be an independent inquiry into the conduct of Government o f f i c i a l s in the investigation and subsequent treatment of social . security pensioners and beneficiaries in these alleged frauds.

. . . / 9

W e wi l l continue to seek such an inquiry from the present Government, despite their apparent determination to cover-up on the whole a f f a ir .

I f the present Government cannot be budged from this a ttitu de , the inquiry will be instituted by the next Labor Government after the next general elections. .

The truth will out. And we wi l l make sure that under Labor administration whatever faults may be uncovered by the inquiry wi l l be remedied.

Another subject covered by our new policy i s the vexed issue of deportations.

W e wi l l have a thorough-going review of this matter, covering both procedures leading up to deportation orders, and rights of appeal.

W e have serious misgivings about the present powers vested in the · Minister and have decided on the basics of new machinery.

W e shall establish a genuinely independent tribunal to handle these matters — independent, that i s , of both the Department and the Minister.

It wi l l be headed by a Judge and have the appropriate legal status. S itting with Judge will be a lay membership representing a cross­ section of the community and including, of course, the particular knowledge and background appropriate to the case under question.

Deportation orders are now being issued at a rate of more than 1,600 a year, with about half of those actually being carried out.

That is a sig n ifica n t number of people to be affected by so important a process, and we are determined to make i t work more f a i r l y , more openly and with far fewer overtones of authoritarianism.

In the same s p i r i t I intend to revive the concept of welfare rights o fficers being appointed at Government expense to work with . community organisations.

I introduced the original, p i l o t program f i v e years ago and my enthusiasm . for i t remains undiminished. .

' - There were 10 office rs appointed under the p i l o t scheme which is now, ‘/ for all practical purposes, being terminated by merging i t back into . :· the bureaucracy. ‘ . ... ·

A Labor Government will certainly revive and expand the progam in i t s original concept - - as an independent and f l e x i b l e channel of assistance, based with the people i t ' s designed to help.

As welfare systems seem, inevitably, to get more complex and more daunting to deal with, i t is imperative that we have these o fficers to protect the rights of the l i t t l e people.

Mr. Chairman, no Australian, whatever their background, can yet r est ' easy that the basis of genuine multiculturalism in this nation is recognised and secure.


Ι have raised today just a sampling of issues which cast serious doubt on any such claim. I'm certain that all of you could add to the l i s t . . z -r·

' ;; .'- v .

But we ar e a m u l t i c u l t u r a l community and t he r e has been a n o t a b l e advance i n t he c o n s c i o u s n e s s o f t h a t f a c t i n t he l a s t g e n e r a t i o n .

There i s an o b l i g a t i o n on Governments t o g i v e l e a d e r s h i p i n i t s f u r t h e r devel opment wherever t he o pp o r t u n i t y p r e s e n t s i t s e l f , or need i s de mons t rat e d.

The n e x t Labor Government wi l l honour that obligation in f u l l . W e regard i t as a baiic element of our humanitarian outlook on the whole f i e l d of p o l i t i c s that this should . .

People l i ke yourselves constitute an invaluable pool of talen t and dynamism in a ss is t in g such e ffo r ts.

People l i ke yourselves are needed in more prominent and active roles in a l l the public a c t i v i t i e s of Government affecting your community.

I hope for, and look forward, to your co-operation, and I assure you that in Opposition and in Government we wi l l be receptive to your proposals on behalf of Australians of Greek background.

Thank you for your attention.