Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Transcript of interview with Suzanne Hill, ABC Local Drive program: 25 April 2013: Anzac Day



Download PDFDownload PDF

Minister for Defence - Interview with Suzanne Hill, ABC Local Radio Drive Program

25 April 2013

TRANSCRIPT: INTERVIEW WITH SUZANNE HILL, ABC LOCAL RADIO DRIVE PROGRAM

TRANSCRIPTION: PROOF COPY E & OE

DATE: 25 APRIL 2013

TOPICS: Anzac Day

SUZANNE HILL: Well, it’s been 70 years since the Japanese Army sent hundreds of Australian

prisoners of war to begin work on a railway cutting that today bears the name of Hellfire Pass.

The name describes pretty accurately the torment suffered by prisoners as the Japanese forced

the rapid construction of this section of the Thai-Burma Railway. Some 2800 Australians died

on the railway, and this morning Defence Minister Stephen Smith was among those attending a

dawn service at Hellfire Pass, and he joins us by phone from Bangkok tonight. Minister, good

evening.

STEPHEN SMITH: Good evening, how are you?

SUZANNE HILL: Well. Describe for us this morning’s dawn service at Hellfire Pass.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, it was very moving. I think all of the people who were there were in a

sense awestruck. So the service starts at 5.30- so it starts in darkness other than lit candles,

and as the service proceeds, the dawn breaks, and the sun comes up. And by the end of the

service, you can actually see all of that vista and, most importantly, all of the actual cut which

is Hellfire Pass itself. There were a half dozen or so POWs who were veterans, some of them

veterans from Hellfire Pass itself, and so all round it was enormously moving, and just to

attend was a great privilege and a great honour.

SUZANNE HILL: It’s hard for those of us who haven’t been there to get a sense of just how

eerie the cutting is, because that’s how I’ve heard it described by people. What can you tell us

about what the pass is like and when you look at it, the sense you get of what went on there

and how horrible it was?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, you can still see in parts of the cut broken drill bits, which just tells you

how hard it was, how terrible a task it was and how inhumane the conditions were. I think in

very many respects, and one of the reasons I attended was not just because it was the 70th

anniversary of the start of the cut but because I think in very many respects Australia has

underappreciated the historical significance of what occurred there. It is eerie as the sun starts

to break the darkness of the night. It’s in a sense quite small, but you can just see from the

rock surface how hard and demanding a job it was, how narrow generally the old rail bed was,

tough and demanding work in terrible conditions.

We were all advised- I’ve never done an Anzac Day service as a Member of Parliament where I

haven’t been in a suit and tie, but the very strong advice and indeed requirement from the

locals was turn up in a shirt and a tie, don’t wear a suit because you won’t be able to suffer the

conditions, and even at six, 6.30 in the morning that was right. So- oppressive conditions,

confined space, thick jungle and then out of nowhere a man made passage, but man made in

the most terrible of circumstances.

SUZANNE HILL: Minister, why do you believe that this particular story in this place has been

underappreciated in our Anzac legend?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, it was only back in the mid-1990s that work was actually done to

effectively restore it and to make it an historic site. Former Prime Minister Keating visited

Thailand in 1994 and asked to go and witness - to have a look at the pass. He had an uncle

who served in the Pacific, and was involved in the Sandakan camp and so he had a keen

interest in it, and the Australian who today manages the war cemetery at Kanchanaburi where

the second service was held today where very many Australian graves are, he was given the

job back in 1994 of essentially cutting a path from the road down to Hellfire Pass itself for the

cutting itself, so that Prime Minister Keating could see it. He had to essentially get in there with

a machete, and he’s got a long-standing interest in prisoners of war and these matters, so he

now essentially manages the cemetery in the town down the road.

When Prime Minister Keating was there he said basically we need to do more to restore this,

and that coincides with the Australia Remembers program, the 1995, the 50th anniversary of

the end of World War II, so Commonwealth funds were applied and that was to Prime Minister

Keating’s credit. To Prime Minister Howard’s credit, he persevered with the program and now

we find the cut has got open access to the public, there’s a museum at the top of the hill and

Prime Minister Howard opened that back in the 1990s, and he tells people, John Howard tells

people, that the day he opened that museum was the hottest day he ever experienced in all of

his time as a Member of Parliament or a Minister or a Prime Minister.

And so it was really, in a sense, lost to history other than those people who were directly

involved, and that is the habit and the practice and almost the way of these things. Most of the

prisoners of war who were involved who survived rarely spoke about it, only spoke about it

with their mates, and so there’s been, over the last 20 or 30 years, a reawakening of what

occurred there. We’ve also seen appropriate memorials and almost shrines of devotions to

Weary Dunlop, because Weary Dunlop of course epitomises the medical assistance that was

given by POWs to their fellow POWs. So it’s taken us a long time since the end of the war to

actually come to where we are now.

And there was also the case that in the immediate aftermath of the war, there was in a sense a

stigma that people had become - that servicemen had become prisoners of war rather than

engaging in the full [indistinct] of war and took time for that to be overcome. We know make

no effective distinction between someone who was a prisoner of war and someone who served,

and that’s an unambiguously good thing.

SUZANNE HILL: Minister, we spoke on this program a couple of hours ago with Professor Joan

Beaumont, who’s been very involved in working up the Defence website and telling the story of

Hellfire Pass on it. And she said that one of the amazing things about the museum there is that

it’s seeing extraordinary numbers of people come through but the vast majority of those are

actually Thai people who are also taking ownership of the story. Do you think Australians at

this point aren’t taking enough ownership of that or - she suggested that perhaps it would be

the Thais who would be left to do the bulk of the carrying on of the story?

STEPHEN SMITH: There are three stories, I think. Virtually there’s the story of the prisoners of

war of the Australians and others including New Zealanders and British, the story of movement

of prisoners of war from Singapore, the establishment of prisoner of war camps and then the

working on the Thai-Burma Railway and Hellfire Pass itself. There’s that story.

Secondly there’s a story of the forced labour. There were - and the precise figures aren’t

known but people estimate over 250,000 Asians who were essentially forced labourers, either

Malays or Thais or Burmese or even people who were brought from what we then described as

Dutch East Indies, now Indonesia, and estimated over 75,000 of those lost their lives. Most if

not all of those would have been cremated so there’s no row of graves or row of headstones to

represent their tragic deaths. And then thirdly is the local Thais themselves who, in selfless

acts of courage, rendered assistance to the POWs as best they could.

So there are three stories to be told and when I was at the museum yesterday and speaking to

people who attended this morning did an appreciation of all of those things. The Australians

who were there are either just - they’re tourists and they happen to coincide with Anzac Day or

they’re there in a sense on a pilgrimage, they’re there because they’ve got a relative who was

on the railway line or they’re family members of one of the POWs who was there - one of the

six or seven who were there for Anzac Day, or they’re Australians who are expats who are

living in Thailand and they just come to essentially see a part of our own history. But there’s a

responsibility I think on all of us to bring more of a focus to this. I don’t think - it’s one of

those things where there’s a shared ownership. We owe a lot to the Thai people for the

courageous work they did helping our prisoners of war and we have our own history there as

well.

SUZANNE HILL: We’re speaking with Defence Minister Stephen Smith who’s joining us from

Bangkok on the phone. Minister, this is your first Anzac Day as Defence Minister. Does the

solemnity of the day change for you knowing that you are the person responsible for our

Defence Forces/ Does it add another angle to what you experience on this day?

STEPHEN SMITH: In a sense, yes. I spend all of my time as a local Member of Parliament going

to my local Anzac Day ceremonies. For those people who know Perth, I used to start at Halliday

Park in Bayswater and I’d end up at Bassendean. And ever since I’ve been a Minister I’ve been

engaged representing the country at a service overseas, variously Bomana in Port Moresby,

Gallipoli itself, Hellespont, Afghanistan and now Hellfire Pass. So it does change it.

And I was actually asked by someone, you know, when you’re standing there for the two

minute silence, you know what goes through your mind- and it’s the point I’ve made in the

context of Afghanistan, which is in any conflict it’s the easiest thing in the world to get in, but

it’s the hardest thing in the world to get out. So whether you’re a Minister for Defence, whether

you’re a Prime Minister, whether you’re a member of a Cabinet, whether you’re a Member of

Parliament, if you are thinking of committing your country’s forces to a conflict, you have to

think very, very carefully that this is in your country’s national interest and national security

interest?

Because the aftermath you’ll never - the aftermath of decision to enter the conflict, you’ll

never know the circumstances will unfold, but what you do know is that there is inevitable

tragedy which will attend upon the individual’s concern, whether they’re service personnel,

whether they’re service men or women, whether they’re innocent civilians of the country where

the conflict is and the like. And Hellfire Pass epitomises all of that: tragic circumstances forced

upon prisoners of war, courageous act by local civilians who are also punished and then forced

labourers from the area and adjoining country. So there are always terrible individual outcomes

as a result of entering into a conflict.

So if you’re going to do it, you want to make sure that it was absolutely in your country’s

national interest and national security interest to do it.

SUZANNE HILL: Minister, thank you so much for your time this evening, and for talking to us

from Bangkok.

STEPHEN SMITH: A great pleasure. Thanks very much. Thank you.