Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
The 2013 federal election report from JSCEM



Download PDFDownload PDF

The 2013 Federal Election report from JSCEM

Posted 16/04/2015 by Damon Muller

After each federal election the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) undertakes an inquiry

into the election. The Committee has already released two interim reports following the 2013 federal

election:

 A recommendation that the Senate electoral system be changed to remove Group Voting Tickets and

introduce optional preferential voting above and below the line; and

 A report recommending that Australian federal elections not move to electronic voting.

The Final Report of the inquiry, released on 15 April 2015, is far more wide-ranging.

The report comments extensively on the Australian Electoral Commission’s (AEC) performance at the 2013

federal election and since. The recommendations include structural changes to the AEC, increased

oversight by the JSCEM, increased training and documentation of training of polling officials, and increased

consultation with parties and candidates. Some of these recommendations will require legislative change,

however many will be able to be undertaken by the AEC now. These changes generally will not be noticed

by the public.

There are a number of recommendations that will profoundly affect Australia’s electoral system, and will be

noticed by everyone who votes.

The Committee recommended winding back the AEC’s Federal Direct Enrolment and Direct Update system

as an integrity measure. The recommended changes would remove the ability for the AEC to update an

elector’s enrolment without the elector’s active confirmation. The Committee noted that requiring

confirmations for direct enrolments would likely increase the number of electors who had enrolments at

different addresses on federal and state rolls, as several states continue to run their own direct enrolment

programs.

In what the Member for Fairfax has hailed as a success, the Committee recommended the AEC supply pens

in polling places. The Committee noted that pencils did not lead to ballot paper tampering, and that there

was no evidence of any pencil marks being tampered with, but that it saw no reason for the continued

exclusive use of pencils. While there has never been any requirement that ballot papers be marked with a

pencil, the legislation currently requires pencils be provided in each polling booth.

In its most ambitious recommendation, the Committee recommended that federal elections adopt the same

voter identification scheme as was used in the 2015 Queensland state election (which is reportedly set to

be repealed by the newly elected Queensland Labor government). This would require voters to provide a

prescribed form of identification at the time of voting, such as a driver’s license, a notice from a utility

provider, or a voter information letter from the electoral commission, or be required to complete a

declaration vote.

The committee noted that there appeared to be no significant problems identified in the use of voter ID in

the Queensland election, however a recent analysis conducted for the NSW Electoral Commission found

that no evidence of widespread electoral fraud in Australia that might be prevented by voter ID.

The JCSEM has previously looked into voter identification. In its 2001 Inquiry into the integrity of the

electoral roll it concluded that ‘the introduction of voter identification is not warranted as a measure to

deter fraud’. The Parliamentary Library has previously published a report examining the issues involved in

voter identification schemes.

The Committee acknowledged that implementing most of its recommendations will involve substantial

costs, but did not attempt to enumerate them.

The Committee avoided recommendations relating to some of the more contentious issues in electoral

administration, such as funding of parties and disclosure of donations (with the exception of Senator

Rhiannon’s dissenting report) and the increase in the rate of early voting.

The Labor and Greens members of the Committee issued a dissenting report arguing against the

recommendations to scrap direct enrolment and to require voter identification. They note that if the drop

in turnout seen in the 2015 Queensland state election was due to voter ID, and was replicated federally,

165,000 Australians could be excluded from voting.

The government has not publically commented on the May 2014 Interim report recommendations to

change the Senate electoral system. This may change now that the final report has been released. It seems

likely that, should the government attempt to legislate the substantial changes recommended in the final

report, it may face resistance in the parliament. However few would argue that having a robust public

discussion about the nature of Australia’s democracy is a bad thing.