- Parliamentary Business
- Senators and Members
- News & Events
- About Parliament
- Visit Parliament
A New Tax System (Fringe Benefits) Bill 2000
House of Reps
- System Id
Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
A New Tax System (Fringe Benefits) Bill 2000
Bill home page
Amendments and requests for
amendments to be moved
(Circulated by authority of
Bill home page
THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
REPLACEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
Amendments and requests for
amendments to be moved
on behalf of the Government
THIS REPLACEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM REPLACES EARLIER CIRCULATED SUPPLEMENTARY EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM IN RELATION TO THIS BILL
(Circulated by authority of
Treasurer, the Hon Peter Costello, MP)
Chapter 1 Fringe Benefits Tax Reform...................................... 3
Fringe Benefits Tax Reform
The amendments made to Schedule 1 to this Bill will:
· provide consistent fringe benefits tax (FBT) treatment between public and non-profit hospitals by replacing the rebate currently available to only some hospitals with an FBT exemption;
· increase the level of benefits eligible for concessional FBT treatment from $25,000 to $30,000 for each employee of a rebatable employer, or a public benevolent institution (PBI) other than a hospital, and effectively postpone the commencement of this aspect of the capping measure until 1 April 2001;
· ensure that a greater number of housing benefits provided to employees of public and non-profit hospitals, charities and police services in regional areas will qualify for the remote area housing exemption, by broadening the definition of remote areas; and
· clarify the operation of the new FBT grossing-up measure by restructuring the provisions that determine whether an input tax credit was available in respect of the provision of a benefit.
Date of effect : The extension of the section 57A exemption to public and non-profit hospitals will apply from 1 April 2000.
The $30,000 cap on benefits provided to an employee of rebatable employer, or a PBI that is not a hospital, is effectively delayed until 1 April 2001. However, the $17,000 cap for public and non-profit hospitals will continue to apply from 1 April 2000.
The new remote area test for public and non-profit hospitals, charitable organisations and the police services will apply from the FBT year commencing 1 April 2000.
The FBT gross-up provisions will continue to apply from 1 April 2000.
Proposal announced : The Bill containing the original measures was introduced into the House of Representatives on 9 March 2000. The $30,000 cap on concessional FBT treatment and the extension of the remote area definition to apply to certain employers was announced in Treasurer’s Press Release No. 22 of 13 April 2000. The remaining measures have not been previously announced.
Financial impact : The total revenue to be raised from the revised FBT capping measure (including the impact of transferring public and non-profit hospitals from the rebate provisions to the section 57A exemption) is expected to be $100 million in 2000-2001, $110 million in 2001-2002, $115 million in 2002-2003 and $120 million in 2003-2004.
The revenue impact of the new remote area test for housing benefits for charities, public and non-profit hospitals, and police services are unquantifiable.
The amendments to the new FBT grossing-up arrangements do not alter the original estimates contained in the explanatory memorandum to this Bill.
Compliance cost impact : The amendments to the new FBT grossing-up provisions and the FBT capping measure will not alter the compliance costs outlined in the explanatory memorandum to this Bill.
Public and non-profit hospitals, charities and the police services will experience reduced costs of compliance and record keeping costs, as a greater number of housing benefits will be eligible for the remote area housing exemption.
1.1 Schedule 1 to this Bill amends the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA 1986) to implement the reforms to fringe benefits tax (FBT) as foreshadowed in the Government’s Tax Reform Document: Tax Reform: not a new tax, a new tax system .
1.2 This Bill will stop the overuse of the FBT exemption for public benevolent institutions (PBI) and limit the concessional FBT treatment for certain non-profit, non-government organisations, exempt remote area housing benefits from FBT, extend the number of employers who will be eligible for exempt remote area housing benefits, exempt from FBT meals provided on a work day to remote area employees employed in a business of primary production, and introduce a new FBT gross-up formula.
Summary of the amendments
Purpose of the amendments
1.3 The purpose of the amendments is to:
· ensure that public and non-profit hospitals are treated consistently for FBT purposes by transferring those hospitals currently included in the rebate provisions to the section 57A exemption;
· increase the level of benefits eligible for the exemption under section 57A, or the rebate available under section 65J, where the benefits are provided to employees of a rebatable employer, or a PBI that is not a hospital, and to effectively postpone the measure until 1 April 2001;
· assist public and non-profit hospitals, charities and police services to attract and retain quality staff in regional areas, by broadening the definition of remote areas so that a greater number of housing benefits provided to these employees qualify for the remote area housing exemption; and
· clarify the operation of the provisions implementing the new FBT gross-up formula.
Background to the legislation
Public and non-profit hospitals
1.4 Under section 57A of the FBTAA 1986, a benefit provided to an employee of a public hospital which is a PBI, or to an employee of a government body where the employee works exclusively for a public hospital that is a PBI, is wholly exempt from FBT.
1.5 However, certain public and non-profit hospitals are not eligible for the section 57A exemption. Instead, they receive a rebate of 48% on FBT paid under subsections 65J(1)(c) and (d) of the FBTAA 1986. The effect of this rebate is that the employees of the rebatable employer can receive fringe benefits at a rate significantly less than the top marginal income tax rate.
Capping FBT exempt benefits and rebates
1.6 This Bill limits the FBT exemption currently allowed under section 57A to certain excluded fringe benefits and $25,000 of each employee’s ‘individual grossed-up non-exempt amount’. Where the section 57A employer is a public hospital that is a PBI, or the employer is a government body and the employee works exclusively for a public hospital that is a PBI, the cap is limited to $17,000.
1.7 Similar rules apply to the rebate of tax allowed under section 65J to certain non-profit, non-government organisations. The rebate available to public and non-profit hospitals under new subsection 65J(2A) is limited to the FBT that has been paid on an employee’s ‘individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount’ of, or less than, $17,000 as well as the FBT paid on any meal entertainment benefits, car parking fringe benefits, and entertainment facility leasing expenses. The threshold for all other rebatable employers is $25,000.
1.8 The FBT law currently provides a number of concessions where certain fringe benefits are provided to employees in ‘remote areas’. Further, this Bill seeks to extend the current remote area housing exemption for primary producers, to all employers who provide housing benefits to their remote area employees.
1.9 Generally, a particular location will be treated as a remote area if it is not at a location ‘in or adjacent to an eligible urban area’. Section 140 of the FBTAA 1986 explains what is an eligible urban area and an adjacent location. Under this provision, an area will be treated as remote where it is at least 40 kilometres from a town of 14,000 or more people and at least 100 kilometres from a town of 130,000 or more people. However, if the location is in either Zones A or B for income tax purposes, it must be at least 40 kilometres from a town of 28,000 or more people, and at least 100 kilometres from a town of 130,000 or more people. The population figures are based on the results of the Census of Population and Housing undertaken by the Australian Statistician on 30 June 1981.
1.10 Section 157 of the FBTAA 1986 states that, for the purposes of the FBT law, Christmas Island and the Cocos (Keeling) Islands are to be treated as remote areas.
New FBT gross-up provisions
1.11 Broadly, the new FBT gross-up formula recoups input tax credits claimed in respect of goods and services tax (GST) paid on fringe benefits. The intent of the measure is to maintain tax neutrality between fringe benefits and cash salary following the introduction of the GST.
1.12 As part of the changes necessary to implement the new FBT gross-up formula, new subsections 5C(3) and (4) of this Bill require an employer to classify fringe benefits into one of 2 types of aggregate fringe benefits amounts. The benefits are grouped according to whether or not input tax credits were available.
1.13 The ‘type 1 aggregate fringe benefits amount’ represents broadly the total value of fringe benefits provided to employees or their associates, in respect of which the provider of the benefit was entitled to input tax credits, at the time the benefit was acquired. The ‘type 2 aggregate fringe benefits amount’ is intended to apply to all other fringe benefits which are not included in the calculation of the ‘type 1 aggregate fringe benefit amount’.
1.14 The new FBT gross-up provisions also impact on the calculation of benefits eligible for exemption under section 57A of the FBTAA 1986, and the amount of rebate available to certain non-profit, non-government employers under section 65J.
1.15 Division 48 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) allows companies that satisfy common ownership rules to be organised as a single group for GST purposes. Non-profit bodies that are members of the same non-profit association may also qualify as a GST group. The grouping arrangements essentially provide for one member of the group to deal with all the GST liabilities and entitlements of the group. Also, any transactions carried out between members within the same GST group will fall outside of the GST system.
Explanation of the amendments
Public and non-profit hospitals
Amendments 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8
1.16 In order to provide consistent FBT treatment between public and non-profit hospitals, those hospitals which are currently eligible for a 48% rebate under paragraphs 65J(1)(c) and (d) will have the rebate replaced by the same exemption provided to public hospitals that are PBIs under section 57A. [New paragraph 57A(2)(b) and new subsections 57A(3) and (4)]
FBT capping changes
Amendments 3 and 6
1.17 Any benefits that are provided to employees of a PBI employer that is not a public hospital, will effectively retain their exempt status under section 57A for the FBT year of tax commencing 1 April 2000. Similarly, a rebatable employer will be entitled to the full rebate calculated under new subsection 65J(2A) in respect of benefits provided in the FBT year of tax commencing 1 April 2000.
1.18 In the case of an FBT year of tax commencing on or after 1 April 2001, the total grossed-up value of benefits that can be provided to each employee of a PBI or rebatable employer, without losing the existing concessions, is increased to $30,000. Note however, that where the employer is a non-profit hospital, a public hospital that is a PBI, a non-government public hospital, or the employer is a government body whose employees work for one of these hospitals, the limit on the amount of benefits which can be provided to these employees remains unchanged at $17,000, as does the 1 April 2000 start date for the measure.
1.19 Thus, in the case of a rebatable employer, or a PBI employer that is not a hospital, these amendments effectively delay the application of the FBT capping measure until 1 April 2001.
1.20 This amendment applies a broader remote area test to housing benefits provided in respect of an employee’s employment with one of the following employers:
· a public hospital that is a PBI or that is non-government;
· a hospital carried on by a non-profit society or a non-profit association;
· a government body where the employee’s duties of employment are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, a non-profit hospital, a public hospital that is a PBI, or a non-government public hospital;
· a government body where the employee’s duties of employment are performed in a police service; or
· a charitable institution. [New subsections 140(1B), (1C) and (1D)]
For all other employers to whom new subsections 140(1B), (1C) and (1D) do not apply, the existing remote area tests contained in subsection 140(1) must be applied for the purposes of the remote area housing exemption.
1.21 Where a housing benefit is provided to an employee of an employer described in paragraph 1.20, the extended remote area test contained in new subsection 140(1A) is to be applied in determining whether the benefit is exempt from FBT under new section 58ZC . Under this provision, an area will be treated as remote where it is situated at least 100 kilometres, by the shortest practicable surface route, from a town with 130,000 or more people (population figures based on the 1981 Census).
Requests for amendment 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8
1.22 Various provisions in this Bill require an employer to identify benefits that involved the provision of goods or services, where on their acquisition, the person providing the benefit was entitled to input tax credits. These provisions are extended to incorporate the common ownership rules for GST purposes. Further, the provisions are restructured so that the test to be used by an employer in classifying benefits is amalgamated into a single test to determine whether the benefit is a ‘GST-creditable benefit’. This term is subsequently defined in new subsection 149A to encompass the tests which are being replaced.
1.23 These amendments restructure and extend the FBT gross-up provisions to enhance the readability of the legislation and ensure consistency of treatment between the GST law and the FBT law.
Request for amendment 9
1.24 New subsection 149A defines what is a ‘GST-creditable benefit’. The first type of benefit to qualify as a ‘GST-creditable benefit’ is one where the person who provided the benefit was entitled to an input tax credit for that benefit by the operation of Division 111 of the GST Act.
1.25 New paragraph 149A(1)(b) applies to GST group arrangements and ensures that a benefit may also be a ‘GST-creditable benefit’ where another member of the GST group, rather than the person who is providing the benefit, is entitled to input tax credits in respect of the benefit being provided by the operation of Division 111 of the GST Act.
1.26 The second category of benefit which will be treated as a ‘GST creditable benefit’ is one that relates to the acquisition or importation of a ‘thing’. The term ‘thing’ replaces the references to ‘goods or services’ used in this Bill. For the purposes of new subsection 149A , thing takes its meaning from the GSTA 1999 where it is defined as anything that can be supplied or imported.
1.27 New paragraph 149A(2)(a) clarifies that the application of the FBT gross-up provisions is not limited only to those situations where the benefit is the ‘thing’ which has been acquired or imported. Rather, the provisions apply to all types of benefits that may arise, depending on the way in which the ‘thing’ that has been acquired or imported, is made available to an employee or an employee’s associate. For example, the provisions would cover benefits that arise from the employee’s use of a ‘thing’, such as a car.
1.28 The ‘thing’ referred to in new subparagraphs 149A(2)(a)(i) to (vi) must have been acquired or imported. To satisfy the tests of a ‘GST-creditable benefit’, entitlement to input tax credits arising from the acquisition or importation of the ‘thing’ must also have been available to the person providing the benefit; or, where the person providing the benefit is a member of a GST group, either that person, or to a person who is or was a member of the same GST group. [New paragraph 149A(2)(b)]
1.29 These provisions ensure that members of a GST group are not able to structure the way in which a ‘thing’ is acquired or transferred between members of the same GST group, in order to avoid using the new FBT gross-up rate. Note, for the purposes of new paragraph 149A(2)(b) , it is not necessary for the person providing the benefit to be a member of the GST group at the time the ‘thing’ was acquired or imported. Similarly, the person who acquired or imported the ‘thing’ or the person who was entitled to input tax credits for the acquisition or importation, does not need to be a member of the group at the time the benefit was provided, in order for the provisions to apply.
Type 2 aggregate fringe benefits amount
Requests for amendment 5 and 6
1.30 The method statement contained in new subsection 5C(4) explains how to calculate an employer’s ‘type 2 aggregate fringe benefits amount’. Steps 1 and 3 of the method statement are rephrased so that the provisions clearly apply to all fringe benefits which are not included in the calculation of an employer’s ‘type 1 aggregate fringe benefits amount’.
1.31 The amendments provide a simpler method for calculating the ‘type 2 aggregate fringe benefits amount’ and make it easier for employers to understand how the provisions operate.
Amendment 1 consequential to the requests for amendment
1.32 Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA 1986 is amended to include the meaning of ‘GST-creditable benefit’. It is defined to have the meaning given by new subsection 149A (see paragraphs 1.24 to 1.29).