Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Interactive Gambling Bill 2001

Part 7 Complaints system: review of decisions

   

61   Review of decisions

             (1)  An application may be made to the Tribunal for a review of any of the following decisions made by the ABA:

                     (a)  a decision to give an Internet service provider a standard access-prevention notice;

                     (b)  a decision to give an Internet service provider a special access-prevention notice;

                     (c)  a decision under section 42 or 56 to:

                              (i)  give a direction to an Internet service provider; or

                             (ii)  vary a direction that is applicable to an Internet service provider; or

                            (iii)  refuse to revoke a direction that is applicable to an Internet service provider.

             (2)  An application under subsection (1) may only be made by the Internet service provider concerned.

             (3)  An application may be made to the Tribunal for a review of a decision of the ABA under section 38 to refuse to register a code.

             (4)  An application under subsection (3) may only be made by the body or association that developed the code.

             (5)  If the ABA makes a decision that is reviewable under this section, the ABA is to include in the document by which the decision is notified:

                     (a)  a statement setting out the reasons for the decision; and

                     (b)  a statement to the effect that an application may be made to the Tribunal for a review of the decision.

             (6)  In this section:

Tribunal means:

                     (a)  before the commencement of Parts 4 to 10 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2001 —the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; and

                     (b)  after the commencement of Parts 4 to 10 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2001 —the Administrative Review Tribunal.