Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Full Day's HansardDownload Full Day's Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Thursday, 6 December 1973
Page: 2591


Senator MURPHY (New South Wales) (Attorney-General and Minister for Customs and Excise) - We oppose the amendment. I gave the reasons during the cognate debate a little earlier.

The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT (Senator Lawrie)- The question is that words proposed to be added be added. All those in favour say 'aye'. Those against say 'no'. I think the ayes have it. Senator Murphy, is a division required?


Senator MURPHY -Senator McManus, what is your Party going to do?


Senator McManus - We will support the Opposition's amendment.


Senator MURPHY - We are running short of time. To save the time of the Senate, it will be indicated on the record that the Government opposed the amendment. This will save the necessity for a division.

Question resolved in the affirmative.

Original question in relation to the Income Tax Assessment Bill (No. 5) 1973, as amended, agreed to.

Question in relation to the Income Tax Bill 1973 and the Income Tax (Non-resident Dividends and Interest) Bill 1973 resolved in the affirmative.

Bills read a second time, and passed through their remaining stages without amendment, requests or debate.

TRADE PRACTICES BILL 1973 (No. 2) Second Reading

Debate resumed from 15 November 1973 (vide page 1879), on motion by Senator Murphy:

That the Bill be now read a second time.







Suggest corrections