Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Thursday, 1 October 1936


Senator BRENNAN (Victoria) (Assistant Minister) . - in reply - The amendment to section 4 has no relation to the dried fruits case, but tho amendment to section 6 has. Whereas the Dried Fruits Boards were originally the authority, these boards haying possibly, as a result of tho Privy Council decision, become invalid, thcwords " a prescribed authority " have been substituted for the words " the prescribed authority within the meaning of the Dried Fruits Act 1928-29-1935." It may well be that the prescribed authority under the amended act will be the Dried Fruits Boards at present in existence.

Question resolved in the affirmative.

Bill read a second time.

In committee:

Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to.

Clause 4 (Rate of bounty).







Suggest corrections