Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Full Day's HansardDownload Full Day's Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Wednesday, 4 December 1935


Senator HARDY (New South Wales) . - May we take it that the scale of pensions provided is intended to recompense a man for his inability to secure " remunerative " occupation ? In other words, may we assume that, if a man is in receipt of a fortnightly wage of 36s., he will be deemed to be employed in a " remunerative " occupation, or is it to be understood that a man is not in a " remunerative " occupation unless he is in receipt of the basic wage?


Senator A J McLACHLAN (SOUTH AUSTRALIA) - A man employed permanently, and receiving the equivalent of the amount of pension provided, will not be deemed to be " permanently unemployable " within the meaning of the act.







Suggest corrections