Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Full Day's HansardDownload Full Day's Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Tuesday, 3 April 1973
Page: 963


Mr SPEAKER -Does the honourable gentleman claim to have been misrepresented?


Mr TURNER - Yes. On Friday, 30th March, the 'Sydney Morning Herald", on page 10, misreported in one particular a speech that I had made. The report said:

Mr Turnersaid he believed television would revive Parliament, which he described as 'a lying institution*.

I did not say 'a lying institution'; I said 'a dying institution'. There is, I think, a certain difference which should be made clear. The context of my speech makes it perfectly clear. I said:

I believe that is-

That is, television - would revive what is. now a dying institution. Why is it a dying institution?

I went on to say that statements which ought to be made in the House are now being made outside the House; that statements are being made to Press conferences which are not the subject of questioning in this House; and that during the period of what I termed 'the duumvirate' fundamental changes of policy were made without debate in this place. In short, I said it in the context that Parliament was being ignored.







Suggest corrections