Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Disclaimer: The Parliamentary Library does not warrant the accuracy of closed captions. These are derived automatically from the broadcaster's signal.
Gruen Planet -

View in ParlView

(generated from captions) This Program Is Captioned

Live. (Applause)

G'day. I'm Wil Anderson.

This is Gruen Planet where we

run the X-ray over spin,

branding, image controlling and tidesing. We'll meet tonight's

panel in a moment but first in

branding news, this week, US

chain Hooters announced it was

suing a rival breast-aurant

... (Laughter) That's right,

there's now a word for them -

for stealing its intellectual

property. (Laughter) See if

you think they have anything in

common. Some people think it's not

about the mountains, but it is.

You can look around, it's an

authentic mountain lodge. We

feel like every guy deserves to

relax in an authentic mountain

lodge, drink 29 degree draft

beer and be catered to by a

beautiful lumberjill.

Completely different!

(Laughter) I don't think the

animals would be the only

things stuffed at Twin Peaks.

The Twin Peaks motto is eats

drinks scenic views but really

it's just about men who seek

the company of other men in

simulated mountain lodge decor.

The Hooters lawsuit comes only

months after Twin Peaks sued a

third breast-aurant chain for

pinching its ideas. True story.

A chain called, wait for it 90s

TV fans, Northern

Exposure. (Laughter) Also bad

news for the restaurant I was

going to open called Groin

Planet. From the world of spin,

fashion label American Apparel

famous for porny ads recently

tried to improve its image with

a competition to try to find

and celebrate plus size

modelled. 24-year-old Nancy

Upton, not a fan, entered

mocking pic s of herself

smeared with cherry pie, lying

naked on a bed of lettuce and

pretending to be a suckling

pig. Somewhere right now, Matt Preston is very turned

on. (Laughter) (Applause)

Because once in a blue moon,

democracy comes through for us,

Nancy won. Backed into a

corner, American Apparel sent

out its best PR guy. Everyone

knows us now. I can't thank her

enough for what she did for

us. Gets around! Last week we

talked breast cancer pink. A

marketing success so huge, it

monsters other causes. Prostate

cancer aware sentence one of

advertising's toughest briefs.

No-one wants a brown

ribbon. (Laughter) But a new

Canadian ad might've cracked

it. I am the prostate check.

You know the time. I know

that time. It's time to check

your prostate. Prostate check,

get your prostate check here. I

can do it here but it might be

very unpleasant for you, right.

(Bleep). You're sweating. I

know. (Applause)

Thank dwod it wasn't the

prostate Siberian. Cold hands.

Or the prostate American. Goes

in with good intentions, messes

the place up, then pulls out

leaving everything on

fire. (Laughter)

Gruen, the daily habit of

successful people.

Time to welcome the panel,

Russell Howcroft and Todd

Sampson. They're joined by two

Gruen debutantes the Managing

Director of City Public

Relations whose clients include

Nathan Tinkler, John Simon and

a 15 year PR veteran whose

clients have included Sydney

Airport and electronics

retailer Bing Lee, Susie Yates.

Welcome. (Applause) Tonight,

our special subject is death

threats. Here's one we prepared

earlier. From last Wednesday's

Sydney 'Daily Telegraph'.

Qantas boss death threat. The

story hit page 3 of the 'Herald

Sun' in Victoria and ran in

News Limited papers around the

country. Tim, why would you

publicise a death threat? You

wouldn't. Under under any

normal circumstances, because

it reflects the company being

at war with its own staff. It

sends out a very bad image

especially for a plane because

they tend to drop out of the

sky. You don't want them say

we're going to kill you and

your body parts will be here

and here, here and here. But industrial disputes are a

really big emotional and

perceptual battle that takes

place in the public using PR. I

think it's no surprise that the

PR people involved in crisis

management will be opportunistic. But releasing a

death threat saying I've got

death threat that just attracts

others. It is really basic PR

don't do it. The only people

that release death threats are

people that, well, maybe

Russell after the weekend I

know you did a stint on radio ... (Laughter) That's a tough

review of your new show. If a

radio person gets a death

threat they tell the world, it

increases their ratings. If

they don't get one, they make

one up. I think e they've been

been in with a meeting with a

journalist and the CEO has been

explaining what's occurring and

someone in the mealing has said

"We've even got a death threat" then suddenly that becomes the

headline. Really? There was

corner in the corner going

(coughs) death threats. We're

getting death threats? I would

be amazed if the public

relations people in Qantas and their advisers said let's tell

the press this is going on. A Qantas spokesperson confirmed

the story had been given to the

Telly on the Tuesday. A photo

shoot was done the same day.

Joyce is smiling and happy in

all of them. Is that the right

look for the occasion? Should

he be hiding under the desk in

the brace position? No. First

of all Alan Joyce definitely

didn't choose his own photo.

That photo either would've been

chosen by his PR person or the

editor. They choose it. It's

out of your control. You supply

options they choose what they

want. How do you as a

communications expert try to

manipulate it so that you get

the right photo and you get the

right journalist? You take your

own shot and give it to the

paper as well as the story. And

hope they'll run that way. And

not come out through the

library and get another shot of

him smiling. That's the trick.

You're trying to control the

message as much as you can. The

best way if you want to control

the media is by ads. That's

what they've resorted to

now. For me, this photo is

evidence that it was an error.

Because if you went into the

meeting with the intention of

saying there's been death

threats, then you would not

take a public relations shot

like this. So I see this as

being ... Unless you wanted to

prove that he'd been up all

night so worried about these

death threats that he forgot to

put a tie on. He always is

photographed, always wears a

tie. In this one it's more

casual. There may be even a

slight couple of days'

growth. Or it was the best

photo they had. If you look at

the dark art behind it, and if

you do believe that they did

place that story, what they've

done is effectively smear the

union. And try to garner the support of the public behind

them, so they would have the

white hats and the unions would

have the black hats. 'Cause

no-one cares. CEO gets a death

threat, who cares? I think it

matters quite a lot. The Qantas

brand is one of the most

powerful brands in Australia. The esteem with which it's held

by the public is a really

important part of its success.

So you can diminish if you like

the lustre of the brand if

you're having front page

headlines like this. The same

morning, it was corporate affairs boss Olivia Wirth

facing the TV cameras. There

has been a campaign going on

for some time not only

targeting myself but also Alan

and other senior executives.

It's part of what is called a

US playbook that the unions are

using. Now they know where to

find you, she is standing

outside Parliament House! Why

send her out and the CEO? He

might've been busy that

morning. From a PR point of

view, this is incredibly

cynical but I will say it

anyway. The threat was made

against her as well which made

it more real. She could talk in

the first person. Putting a CEO

on the line taking personal

responsibility is a big risk.

We know that from BP. On

television they can read your

television, the smile on your

face, within secs they can

think if you smile, you're

insincere. If you look down to

the left you're lying. If you

touch your hair you're

insecure. You choose a

performer. She is a

performer. What's this US playbook she is talking

about? They repeated that term

over and over again to make it

sound like it was something

really important. It's not

really. It's a guidebook. And

they're basing it on something

that has been done in the US,

by pilots over there. Is it

that part of it, to make it

sound like it's this slick

operation they've got against

them? They've planned this.

They're getting their cue from

the US. They're going to do

what the US pilots did. They're

going to slam management. It

will be part of the playbook

for the unions is make the

management the enemy, is what's

going on. You have to, from a

media point of view you've got to make it black and white. You

have to make it easy for people

to consume ... And take a side. Hardly surprisingly the

unions decided not take it

lying down. The head of the

Transport Workers Union has his

own evidence of intimidation,

abusive emails sent to union

officials. If you (bleep) my

holiday I'm coming looking for

you (bleep). The next time a

bus leaves at midday, be under

it. I love that, the next time

a bus leaves at midday. Be

under a one. Don't catch an

early bus! Or a late bus. But

lie under the midday bus.

They're in the scheduling business. Specific! So each side seems to have evidence

that the other is a bully.

Todd, does that just neutralise

the situation? It definitely

puts up a smokescreen. But I

actually think this was a

missed PR opportunity by the

unions. Because choosing to

attack the PR that there was a

potential death threat just

adds credibility to the notion

that they're aggressive.

Another way of the handling it

from the unions' perspective

would've been to come out and

say look, if this has happened,

we will investigate it, we

don't tolerate this within our

movement. Now back to the real

issue here. The union response

didn't get the headlines like

the original claim did. What do

unions have to do to get on the

front page? Follow through,

kill someone. (Applause) If

it's true, and the union is

responsible for the death threats, they're going to lose

more than the PR game. That's

major criminal stuff. I think

what they need to do now is

continue with their strategy,

and it's a similar sort of thing they've done with the

strikes this week. Pull their

strikes. Say they're strike

then pull their strike. Union

boss sds more than provide

evidence of threats against

them. They were also quite

happy to suggest where police

might find the auth authority

of the Qantas threat. If the

allegations are true they need

to probicically be investigated

by the police. If the

allegations aren't true they

should be looking at the hard

drives of the media team of

Qantas to find out whether they

produced this document. That's

a big card to play. If the

death threats turned out to be

real, haven't they lost the PR

game? They've completely lost

the PR game, but now is the

time for them to back off, drop

that work, there has been the

tit for tat, but did something

completely different, change the strategy. There is no way

that Alan Joyce running one.

Largest companies in Australia

would wake up one morning and

think "I'm going to create a

death threat. I'm going to go

to the public with that death

threat." That would be

moronic. Normally the union

have the emotive side 'cause

they represent the people but

in this case Qantas has the

emotive side. And Tim, do you think that's the case? I

imagine that someone like an

Alan Joyce, in a public

position like that, gets death

threats all the time. You lost

my bags, I will kill you, sort

of thing. (Laughter) A lot of

Chief Executives in Australia

get death threats all the time. They go to the police and handle it privately. I think

this is what should've happened

in this case as well. I don't think there are any winners

apart from the competitors. The

public has a choice. We can go

to Jetstar, but he can also go

to Virgin and we can use Tiger

if we like. We all have

choices. (Laughter) Using

Tiger is kind of going I

haven't got any condoms but I

can pull out, I

think. (Laughter) (Applause)

Qantas, which as our friends

at The Chaser said still calls

Australia 51% home, may be

looking in the wrong place for advice. The question it needs

to ask itself is simple. What

would Putin do? If one man

Russian spin tornado Vladimir

Putin wanted to win back public

support because his brand was

on nose, how would he do it?

He'd find on opportunity to

show he's both decisive action

man and caring animal lover. As

he did in 2008 by tranquilising

a rogue tiger that had broken

out of its restraints, saving

the lives of the news crew he

just happened to have with him. (Laughter) What a

magnificent beast! And the

tiger's cute too! Gruen, we

take the burden out of tax.

Now, a countdown of this

week's tragically naked

attempts to grab our attention.

At No. 3, Doritos. In the week

Steve Jobs left us, more on

that in a minute, we're

reminded that even death can be

a promotional opportunity.

Frederick Bauer, the man behind

the original Pringles can,

asked to have his ashes buried

in one after his death in 2008.

Now, Doritos creator Arch West,

who died a few weeks ago, has

been buried in a casket

sprinkled with corn chips.

Which makes this recent US ad

for the company steam a bit

spooky. At least he got his

dying wish. A jumbo casket full

of Doritos.

It's a miracle! In other

news, the boss of Dominos wants

to be buried in a box with the

dots. When the colonel kicks

the bucket he wants it filled

with hot'n'spicy and original

recipe and Ronald McDonald has

stipulated when he dies it will

be a straightforward cremation.

Would you like to fry with

that? No. 2 is playboy. This

meek the playboy club came the

first show cancelled in the new

US TV season. The veteran wank

mag responded to the setback

with pink washing launching

bunnies for the cure. For every

person who follows playboy on

Twitter during October, it will

donate a whopping 10 c to

breast cancer research. As long

as the total doesn't exceed 10

grand. Given playboy's whole

empire is built on breasts

there's one figure that could

do with surgical en enhancement. $10,000, that's

what Hef spends on Viagra and

Mylanta a month. Our publicity

winner in week is ... Amanda

Knox. Freed from an Italian

jail acquitted of the murder of

Meredith Kercher, Knox has been

inundated with offers since she

returned to the States. Huge

cash bids for film and book

rights, interviews and

appearances. Her local radio

station has promised a 10 grand

a week if she will turn DJ and Hollywood's biggest porn

company Vivid wants her to be

its clothing optional

spokeswoman. Tim, say she's

your client. What would you do

this week? I would've hired a

ghost writer to start with and

start writing the book of her

life. She's already started to

publish excerpts of her diary,

so clearly there's a diary deal

in it as well as the book deal.

Basically I'd be booking for

her every possible reality show

and endorsement you can right

at this point because I think

the story will get very, very

old very, very quickly. I would be trying to capitalise on it as much as I can right now. I

feel a bit ill just listening

to it. You're just like wow. If

I kill someone and then get off

I'm hiring him! (Applause)

(Laughter)

She was free. She's

innocent. You get it all done

now, over and done with?

Yep. There is already a

fascinating ex erpt from one of

our diaries. It's not good to

keep someone in a cage like

this. That's poetry! Move

over, Anne Frank! Exactly. The

trick is it to leak out little

bits of information as a teaser

to the big sell and you flog it

hard as hard as you can. Maybe

that's not the right terminology. (Laughter) I felt

like that was the perfect

terminology.

Susie, what would you

do? The story will die at a

certain time but there's going

to be the movie. So I would

keep my powder dry for the

movie and the book at the same

time. I would probably do a major in the old days it

would've been Oprah, now it

would be American Sixty Minutes

and do one king-hit. But have

some of those really meaty

stories held back. Maybe the

jail lesbian mother or

something like that. Hold them

back. And then when the movie

and the book ... (Laughter) I

like that. I can work with

that. (Laughter)

Gruen Planet, all for

fashion.

And now, the Pitch where we

ask agencies to sell the

unsellable. Based on real-world

scenarios. This week we asked

them for a campaign on behalf

of the Tasmanian Government to

convince us to move the

offshore processing of asylum

seekers closer to home to the

Apple Isle. Can they do it?

Please welcome Belinda Lightfoot and Nick Lewis.

Did your idea come by

boat? Yes, it did. As with

anything, we always started

with who the audience is. In

this case we believe it to be

the fence sitters and those who believe in onshore processing

not not in backyard. This is a

race against time. It's a race

against the odds. Indeed, some will never make it. But still

they try. Because people who

start this race believe they

have no choice. We want asylum

seekers to find a safe haven in

Tasmania. The perfect place for

the new processing centres.

We're an island. We're remote.

And boat people mean jobs. It's

money spent in Australia for

Australians. Processing centres

should be built in Tasmania.

Because no-one else wants them

and we do. Everyone wins. (Applause)

How did you smuggle the

truth in? Our approach was to

address the issue of the fear

and talk to the history of

Tasmania and the fact that for

a long time, Tasmania has

welcomed the displaced. So

rather than fearing today's

asylum seekers we should be

welcoming them. Let's have a

look. We welcome those in need.

We welcome those who have

suffered for freedom. Those who

have fought for hope. Whose

childhood was lost. We welcome

the chance to give the weak

courage. The silent a

voice. And the prosecuted

peace. We welcome hard work. We

welcome brave dreams. We

welcome those who can make

Australia proud. We are

Tasmania. We welcome those who

seek asylum.

(Applause)

Both amazing I think.

Russell, what did you prefer? I

like the idea of Belinda and

the notion that everyone could

win. However, Sputnik and Nick,

I think really I think you

captured what a lot of us are

thinking about this issue. Congratulations. I thought it was great. (Applause)

I was moved by the Sputnik

one. I really enjoyed it. But

for me, Belinda's campaign, I'm

a Tassie fan and you visually

depicted the beauty of

Tasmania, along with those

really graphic images of the

people arriving in the boat. So

Belinda for me everyone

wins. (Applause) Tim? I

thought they were both terrific

. But No. 1 actually found a

reason for Tasmania to continue

operating as a State.

(Laughter) I go with No. 1.

You know this show goes to

Tasmania? (Laughter) You might

not be welcome now. They'll

lock you up! Todd, which

one? I thought they were both

good. I thought the second one

was excellent. And I was very

proud of it, hope the

government watches, so I go for

the second one. (Applause)

They were both amazing. It's

only fitting that you get half

a trophy each.

We already know what the

shock jocks think but you can

share your wisdom at our web

site or on Facebook or Twitter.

Next week on the Pitch, a campaign for this brand.

Gruen Planet, the power of

dreams.

Now, how do you sell a brand

when the guy who is the brand

dies. Let's set the scene by

reminding ourselves what a

family visit to the Mapple

store looks like. Attention

Mapple universe. Prepare for a

live announcement from Mapple

founder and chief imaginative

officer Steve Mobs. Steve

Mobs! He's a genius. He's like

a God what knows what we

want. Greeting, it is, your

insanely great leader Steve

Mobs. I'm speaking to you from

Mapple headquarters deep below

the sea with an announcement

that will completely change the

way you look at everything.

Oh!

Another fine example of The Simpsons writers hitting the

nail on the head. In the last decade Apple has become almost

a religion with Steve Jobs its

charismatic God-head A

neuroscience experiment recently confirmed that the

parts of the brain activated

when Apple fans see the

products are exactly the same

as those that light up when

Christians see pictures of

Jesus. Russell, last week

Steve Jobs powered down for the

final time. (Laughter) What

will his death mean to the

Apple brand? One commentator

said Steve Jobs was Willy Wonka

and everyone else was

Oompaloompas. I'm not so sure

that's the reality of the Apple

beast. It's a top 10 value

brand in the world. It's one of

the top 2 most valued companies

in the US. I think the share

price is still fine. You have

to be concerned because clearly

the magic dust that Steve Jobs

was able to create obviously

had a huge amount of impact on

the success of that business

and that brand. And it is

interesting to think about

Sony. Sony of course was a

great success story, 80, 90s,

and then their founder, he

died, and I'm sure Sony didn't

think that there'd be a big

problem but Sony doesn't have

the same lustre that it used to

have. There so there'd be great

concern. In the Mead term you

would think all will be fine.

The major concern for Apple is

around conservatism. You

imagine you inherit the role of

running Apple. Your main role

will be not screw it up. The

danger is that is an inherent

conservatism that comes with

that in a company where Steve

Jobs let by instinct. Con

serving tichl is a big risk for

Apple al this stage. You can

imagine a playbook and the

title is 'What would Steve do?'

In the end that would atrophy

the business. You would say, am

I thinking differently or am I

not thinking differently? The

PR that's out there at the

moment is that there are four

or five products that jobs

created and that will be rolled

out over the next couple of

years, so his genius still

lives. I think the brand is

bigger than him. I think the

average punter out there just

loves the product. They love

the brand. He's invested in the

brand. That will live for a

long, long time. One of the

things Jobs was famous for was

his micromanagement of the company's marketing including

this ad which heralded his

return to Apple in 1987. Here's

for the crazy ones, the rebels,

the troublemakers. The ones who

see things differently.

While some may see them as

the crazy ones, we see genius.

Because the people who are

crazy enough to think they can

change the world are the ones who do.

Of course some crazy people

just throw poo at the

wall. (Laughter)

They didn't make the ad

though apparently. Programs the

most successful ungrammatical

slogan ever. Jobs was diagnosed

with cancer seven years ago.

Could Apple have done

differently? I've been involved

in a couple of these campaigns

where we've lost CEOs. When an

illness is first diagnosed, you

do, you jump on the front foot

immediately. And you work out,

well, what is our plan. Who

will be the suppose person? In

one situation we do did replace

a very well-known spokesperson

with a family member. You have

that plan. I think they have

planned for it. Or the big

mistake that they made was last

week when they released the

iPhone 4 with benefits which

obviously everybody thought was

the iPhone 5, now this was

released the day before Steve

Jobs died. And the share price

did tumble on that day. I

They didn't know he was going

to die. It would've been quite

difficult - if they could

manage that, that is a

miracle. (Applause) I think the

PR for Steve Jobs over the last

maybe two to three years has

been held ransom by the stock

market. There was a time where

if Steve Jobs took sabbatical

the share price dropped. Steve

Jobs went to the toilet for too

long, the share price would

drop. That's changed over time.

Companies are inherently bad at

succession planning. Most CEOs

don't want to talk themselves

out of their job while they're

in it. In this case they had to

keep succession planning a

secret for a very, very long

time. They knew as soon as that's mentioned in combination with the imness the PR would be

he's out. Last week at the

launch of the iPhone 4S we saw

new CEO Tim Cook anointed by

Jobs only weeks ago. This is my

first product launch since

being named CEO I love Apple. I

consider it the privilege of a

lifetime to have worked here

for almost 14 years. The am I

vm excited about this new role.

Very excited. I'm very

excited. Watch some old Big

Kev clips mate. (Laughter)

He is tall and skinny like

Steve, wears jeans like

Steve's, looks like he studyed

a few jobs presentation videos.

Todd, if you're Apple do you

try to build up another guru or

go for a complete new strategy? You definitely don't

try to replace Steve Jobs.

People are less loyal to

individuals running companies

or even to brands in general.

They're incredibly loyal to

utility. We all know that Mark

zuken Berg is an ego maniac

that's controlling us on

Facebook but we use it because

it's useful to us. They won't

get the PR hit they got with

Steve Jobs. If they continue to

use Tim Cook they're dead.

Really. (Laughter) I think

before you said that the union

should kill somebody ... Now

you're saying we should kill

off the new guy from Apple. Are

there other people you'd like

to get killed? This is a

company that has more cash than

the US Government at the

moment. They have plenty of

cash to throw around. They'll

spend it in as many marketing

vehicles as possible. They

definitely need to bring out

the i-Steve or the

i-jobs. (Laughter)

Maybe. I-jobs just sounds

rude. Name the best product

they have in their box of

tricks after Steve Jobs in some

way. I think this is actually

an opportunity for Apple. Steve

Jobs said himself death is the

best invention of life and I

think this is - they didn't

need him to die but this is an

opportunity for Apple to do

something different. The bottom

line is he was great PR copy.

He sold thousands of products

on the basis of his name that

will be missing from the

equation from now on.

Especially if that guy keeps

wearing skivvies. He looked

like something that even The

Wiggles would look at and go

"You are a nerd." Gruen

Planet, the science of looking

awesome.

That is all for tonight.

Please thank our wonderful

panelists, Russell, Susie, Tim and Tom. (Applause)

We will leave you with the

latest crack at the title of

worst product of all time.

The winner of this year's

competition will take home the

Gruen golden steak knives which

are this week wobbling about in

the back of Australian cricket

are the clearly dodgy and

unreliable agent Mazhar Majeed

told a London court on Monday

that Aussie players are the biggest match fixers. Ow!!

Come on, our team can barely

even play cricket let alone fix

it! (Laughter) Tonight,

remember, when your parents

used to get angry at you for

wiping your nose on your sthreef? Well they didn't know

you were doing the right thing.

They didn't know snot could be

fun and fashionable. As this

frightening and frankly

nauseating ad points out. See

you next week.

Jimmy, please cover your

mouth when you sneeze. Even

covering your mouth doesn't

prevent the spreading of germs.

So how do you protect your

family and those around you?

It's easy. My sneezy. It's the

fun and fashionable way to

teach your child the proper

sneezing technique. It's a

soft ash southernent innovative

tool that will help train your child This Program is Captioned

Live. (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE)

Welcome to Hamilton, the show

about what is making news and

how the news is made. Any

second the sky will fall in

because Australia we're getting a Carbon Tax.

Only an ABC audience would

clap a new tax.

You have to admire Julia

Gillard though. She has been

very determined to get these

laws through and has prevailed

over weak, backfliping

politicians, I yoits who want

more useless talk and

unprincipled liars who will say

anything to get elected. It has

been one hell of a ride to get

to this point. A hard one poor the Government to get a balance

right on. At the start of the

debate Labor's position was

this. Climate change is the

great moral challenge of our generation. Now on the Government's clean energy future website they lead with

this: How much will I get, that

is the great moral journey we

have all gone on. At least now

the laws have gone through the

public debate should calm

down. Things were much more

measured on talk back this morning. Democracy in Australia

as we have none it is dead.

Naturally the media chose to

focus on the big smouldering

kiss between Gillard and Rudd

in the parliament. It was good

to see them kiss and make up.

They went too far when they continued under the Australian

flag. Disgraceful! Not on! Inappropriate! I'm just

glad they are talking again. Of

course earlier in the week the

tension was palpable as Rudd

and Gillard scram ed to be the

best friend of the 14-year-old

teenager who was arrested for

drugs in Bali. First Rudd was

on the case then Gillard got on

the none then Rudd had to go

one better by going over to Bali and actually smoking a

bong with the boy. I thought it

was a lovely gesture. It has

been a tricky story for the media. Obviously the boy is

young. Because of his age

channel Ten, Seven and the ABC

decided to protect his identity

by obscuring his face. Channel

9 opted to reveal his identity

and give his name and face. We

don't want to make the same

mistake as them. When we show

you nine's footage here we have

altered his case so as not to

prejudice the case. No, no, no. After Nine's official stuff

up they went too far the other

way and started pixelating

everyone. That is overly

cautious surely. Sure enough it

didn't take long for the

networks to send their

reporters over there. A few

have missed the story. They are

so focused on the kid that

bought if marijuana but they

failed to miss the giant

shipment of co taint that

cruised behind them. The media

has been supportive of the boy.

Even Steven price had an

interesting line of

defence. This is an innocent

exchange of money and

drugs. Craig come son had an

innocent exchange of money for innocent exchange of money for prostitutes.

Elsewhere in happier nows the

Wallabies had a big win this week.

They are through to the

semifinals of the Rugby World

Cup narrowly getting home over

south Africa after an inspired to play 'Black Caviar'.

What a weekend for 'Black

Caviar'. The whole country has gone 'Black Caviar' crazy. Exactly the morale

booster to gaming industry

needed after all the anxiety

over the pokie laws. Clubs

Australia had a bad week as

wheel revealing the plan to