Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Disclaimer: The Parliamentary Library does not warrant or accept liability for the accuracy or usefulness of the transcripts.These are copied directly from the broadcaster's website.
Early Agenda -

View in ParlView

AM Agenda

1 November 2010

KIERAN GILBERT: Joining me this morning on AM Agenda to look at all of the issues of the week
ahead, the Parliamentary Secretary for Foreign Affairs Richard Marles, from Melbourne, good
morning, Richard.

RICHARD MARLES: Good morning, Kieran.

KIERAN GILBERT: And from our Sky News Centre the Shadow Minister for, the Shadow Special Minister
of State Bronwyn Bishop, Bronwyn Bishop thank you very much for your time as well.

BRONWYN BISHOP: Great pleasure.

KIERAN GILBERT: I want to start in Melbourne though, Richard Marles the Victorian Premier heading
to Government House today, the campaign starts tomorrow. This is a real test for him and his
government isn't it given as I say, the Greens' vote is looking very strong in the polls?

RICHARD MARLES: Well, look this is going to be a tough fight here in Victoria. It's, of course, a
government that's been in power since 1999 so everyone understands the fight is ahead of John
brumby but I think that he's very much up to the task. This is a really good government, John
Brumby's a very good economic manager, the OECD regard Victoria as one of the best regional
economies in the world. And speaking as somebody who lives in regional Victoria I think John
Brumby's been arguably the most important state politician we've ever had in terms of regional
Victoria so there's a lot of positives out there and I'm confident that he's going to put up a good
showing and we'll see this government get re-elected.

KIERAN GILBERT: Bronwyn Bishop it was the worst state for the Coalition, I think, at the recent
federal election if not the worst certainly one of the strongest states for Labor. Any hopes for
Ted Baillieu that he might be able to pull off an upset here?

BRONWYN BISHOP: Well, I think Ted Baillieu is surprising people. I think earlier on it was thought
that the Labor Party would have an easy ride and then suddenly Ted and his team have started to
emerge as putting up a real challenge and I think you certainly wouldn't want to write them off. I
think they're certainly in there with a chance.

KIERAN GILBERT: Okay, let's look at Julia Gillard's overseas visit now, Richard to you, the focus
at the weekend at the East Asia Summit was very much on this asylum plan. Julia Gillard made
reference to it in her remarks before she left, she left Vietnam. I want to play those to you then
get both of your responses to it.

JULIA GILLARD: I'm pleased that there is a specific paragraph on this question in the Chairman's
statement.

KIERAN GILBERT: Yeah, specific reference in the communiqué, Richard but it's a long way from a
commitment to the regional body itself, this regional facility itself and, indeed, a long way from
having it built.

RICHARD MARLES: Well, look the first thing is that Julia Gillard went to the East Asia Summit to
raise this issue. It's been, formed part of the communiqué at the end of the summit so I don't
think you get better than that. She's raised this issue in a number of bilateral meetings that
she's had and, of course, she's going to Malaysia today and she'll also be going to Indonesia. We
understand that this is an issue which is only going to be solved with the help of our neighbours.
It is a regional problem and so it needs a regional solution. She's raised it and I think this has
been a really important foray and her part into the foreign policy world and I think she's done a
great job at this summit.

KIERAN GILBERT: Is there a risk, Richard, that they're just simply being polite with the Prime
Minister there but there's, I mean as I say, reference in a communiqué is different and a long way
from having the bricks and mortar built in East Timor?

RICHARD MARLES: Well, you wouldn't expect the bricks and mortar to form part of a communiqué from a
summit of this kind, What you're wanting to do at a summit of this kind is to raise attention
around the issue itself to make sure that it's put on the agenda and Julia Gillard did that. We
have never said that this is going to be something which is able to be built overnight. This is a
processing centre which is going to take some time to deliver but what's important is that we
understand this to be a regional problem, we understand that to have a long term solution to this
issue you need more than a three word slogan, you actually need to work with your neighbours to
come up with a solution to the problem. We're doing that and our minds are very much in the long
term about trying to get a solution to this problem going forward and I think that we can do this
and I think this is an important step forward.

KIERAN GILBERT: Bronwyn Bishop does this show that Julia Gillard is being serious about this
approach or this policy solution? She's mentioned it at the East Asia Summit, today Kuala Lumpur
tomorrow Jakarta and President Yudhoyono, so she's certainly speaking to the right people about it
all?

BRONWYN BISHOP: Look, absolutely not. This is not a serious policy for this government at all and I
think you can call Julia Gillard very easily satisfied because really, I think, what she got is a
polite put down. The fact of the matter is that if she was serious she would reopen Nauru; she
would introduce, reintroduce Temporary Protection Visa's and be serious about stopping the boats
coming. The bottom line, what we're sending out are the soft messages, what the Indonesians have
previously called the sugar on the table, we've heard so many comments in the media this morning
saying that we are making it more and more attractive and that you can expect more and more boats
and boat people to come. The illegal arrivals are just that and we are very serious about saying
that we want people to come through the front door not the back door, the Labor Party isn't and the
sight of opening up our defence bases to put the illegal asylum seekers in just, just a nonsense.
There is no sincerity in this policy at all, it will never happen.

KIERAN GILBERT: Richard Marles ...

RICHARD MARLES: Can I just say ...

KIERAN GILBERT: ... well, one of the points, I'll let you respond but I want to put one of the
points that Bronwyn Bishop made there and it refers, I think in part to The Australian newspaper
report today where it's quoting senior Pakistani official charged with fighting people smugglers,
he says the government is sending all the wrong messages with its recent policy reforms.

RICHARD MARLES: Well, look, I don't think that's right at all, I think we're sending a message that
we want to have a long term solution to this problem. We know that there are a lot of people on the
move at the moment, there are a lot of refugees on the move globally and every country is feeling
this issue particularly at the moment and I think the notion that people in villages in Afghanistan
or Sri Lanka are, you know, folding or opening the pages of The Australian newspaper ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: Oh or goodness sake.

RICHARD MARLES: ... every morning to work out exactly what the policy of the Australian government
is patently ridiculous. But can I just say in relation to what Bronwyn was talking about. Nauru was
not a processing centre, Nauru was a holding centre, Nauru was a backdoor to this country, and
almost everyone who went to Nauru ended up in Australia. It is not a solution to the problem, what
we need to have is actually a regional processing centre, one which is being done in conjunction
with the United Nations and Julia Gillard met with the Secretary General of the United Nations to
talk through this proposal with him ...

KIERAN GILBERT: But, so, so Nauru was under the auspices ...

RICHARD MARLES: ... so we actually have a centre which deals with this issue.

KIERAN GILBERT: But Richard, Nauru was also

BRONWYN BISHOP: Absolutely.

KIERAN GILBERT: ... under the auspices of the UNHCR. Let's talk to, get Bronwyn Bishop's response
though to this idea that most of the people that were on Nauru ended up here anyway so, you're
talking tough Bronwyn Bishop but ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: You bet I am.

KIERAN GILBERT: ... did you really deliver when in government?

BRONWYN BISHOP: Absolutely we did, when we were in government we stopped the boats coming. We had a
permanent solution ...

RICHARD MARLES: You built a backdoor called Nauru.

BRONWYN BISHOP: ... the rot started when the Rudd government abolished Temporary Protection Visas,
it's been a downhill run since then and I feel sorry for Richard having to defend the indefensible.

KIERAN GILBERT: Alright, let's move on. COAG and the state Commonwealth relations, we've heard all
this talk about cooperative federalism, Bronwyn bishop, now we're hearing that there's going to be
a review, that Ken Henry's going to review this, the COAG Agreements between the states and the
Commonwealth that there's too much on the agenda, that under Kevin Rudd it was too cluttered but at
least, I suppose, he had a go. It wasn't one of the bright points of the Coalition government
reforming this area was it?

BRONWYN BISHOP: Well, I suppose what you're seeing is the contrast whether or not you utilise the
Section 96 tied grants or whether you have these broad outcome agendas. COAG has become enormously
bureaucratised. From my personal preference I always like I bit of competitive federalism, I think
it shows up better results and I think it's become mired in bureaucratic process. Having attended
those Ministerial Councils as a Minister I have to say that I do think there is a great need for a
tightening up of the process and hopefully this review might actually do something ...

KIERAN GILBERT: Alright ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: ... but unless we see some more competition being allowed to emerge between the
states, and I think Colin Barnett is one who seems to be taking a lead in this area, I think
Australia is poorly served by being over bureaucratised.

KIERAN GILBERT: Richard Marles, is this, is this reform a welcome one and is the agenda on the COAG
table just too cluttered particularly, I suppose, given the strains we've seen in recent times?
We've seen, you know, the rhetoric between the Prime Minister and the New South Wales Premier for
one, cooperative federalism looks like it's very much under pressure at the moment?

RICHARD MARLES: Well, can I just say that the competitive federalism model that we saw under the
Howard government put the whole state of federalism into a catatonic fit. I mean we saw complete
paralysis on this issue. Under John Howard there was no move in terms of getting reform in relation
to federalism, in terms of getting unified legislation on anything whatsoever. The Howard
government essentially threw its hands in the air and did nothing on this all. This is hard reform,
it's not just a matter of the federal government biting the bullet on its own reform decisions,
you've actually got to corral eight other governments in the process so this is difficult stuff but
...

KIERAN GILBERT: But Richard did the Rudd government try to be too ambitious in this area? Are there
too many reform items on the COAG agenda?

RICHARD MARLES: Well, look I think having the review is fair enough, but I think the point you made
in your initial statement on this is right, we're having a go and we've actually had some really
good achievements. I mean, you've got standardised business reporting which has come out of this
process that's worth $800 million to the Australian economy every year; we've got a streamlined
system of registering business names that's worth $1.5 billion over eight years and even if you
look at occupational health and safety that, you know, this is a very important reform ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: Well, it's failed ...

RICHARD MARLES: ... we've got an agreement ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: ... New South Wales pulled out.

RICHARD MARLES: ... sure, well, we've got a fight with the New South Wales government but the
important thing is we're actually having that fight and the culmination of that fight, one hopes,
will lead to, for the first time, a national system of occupational health and safety. So, we're
addressing the issue, the Howard government completely put their head in the sand.

BRONWYN BISHOP: Kieran ...

KIERAN GILBERT: Well, let's get Bronwyn's response before, we've got to take a break shortly
Bronwyn.

BRONWYN BISHOP: Yeah, look, what we've got to see, we've had reciprocity agreements on the table
for a long time, they need to be implemented but more particularly until people are prepared to
address the problem of vertical, fiscal imbalance we will not see a real truly federal policy
because the states are forever losing their tax base and yet they're being given more and more
things they've got to pay for. Then they try and unload it into local government and we get into a
terrible administration mess. Those are the issues that really have to be addressed.

KIERAN GILBERT: Okay, time for a quick break, we'll be right back, stay with us on AM Agenda.

Welcome back to AM Agenda, with me this morning Bronwyn Bishop at the Sky News Centre and in
Melbourne Labor's Parliamentary Secretary for Foreign Affairs Richard Marles. I want to look now at
Greg Hunt, the Shadow Environment Minister's called for a judicial inquiry into the pink batts
scheme. He made that call yesterday; he's going to introduce a private member's bill along these
lines. He was on Australian Agenda yesterday.

GREG HUNT: The Auditor General, and this is not a criticism, is only empowered to investigate the
operation of the Department in implementing the program, not in the position to investigate the
link between the four tragedies and the program, not in the position to investigate the providence,
the nature, the quality of the policy and the advice received by the ministry from outside of the
executive and not in a position to investigate the executive. This has been the greatest failure of
public policy in a single program since the Second World War, in my view, and it must be the
subject of a full judicial inquiry.

KIERAN GILBERT: Richard Marles in Melbourne, this, these sorts of things, these sorts of private
member's bills can cause a real headache for you in the current Parliamentary environment. They
provide a real threat.

RICHARD MARLES: Oh well, in terms of the process of the Parliament, you know, we welcome a new
paradigm. We're working with it and I think these sorts of private member's bills from across the
Parliament are going to, you know, provide some interesting debate within the Parliament. So,
there's no problem with that. In terms of this particular bill, though, can I say that it is a
political stunt. We're not going to have any time with it. You know, what you're seeing with the
Opposition is a complete refusal to accept the umpire's decision. We've had the Auditor General's
report; as Greg Hunt was talking about he didn't like the outcome of that so he's moving down the
path. We've had the Hawke Report, he didn't like the outcome of that either so we're getting this
private member's bill. We understand the need for accountability and transparency which is why
we've had these reports, which is why we're having monthly reports of the way in which the
program's going. But our focus is on getting it done, completing the inspections, making safety the
first priority and we're not going to be, we're not going to be put off the track by political
stunts of this kind.

KIERAN GILBERT: Bronwyn Bishop, the Coalition did call for the Auditor Report, that was delivered
and it seems, what 's your response to that assertion from Richard Marles that these various
reports that have been delivered, you don't like them so you'll keep pursuing one till you find one
that does suit you.

BRONWYN BISHOP: Kieran, I am very offended that Richard could call the death of four young
Australians and our concern about that a stunt, I find that offensive. Secondly ...

RICHARD MARLES: That's not what I said.

BRONWYN BISHOP: ... the Auditor General only has the power to conduct a project audit, that's what
it did and the point that Greg hunt made about his power's to look at the connection between the
policy implementation and the death of those four young Australians was absolutely correct. Now,
the only way you can look at the way that this mess was gotten into is to have the inquiry that
Greg is calling for. The other point I would make very strongly is that the Minister refuses, Mr
Combet refuses to release the details of the outcome of the inspections that are being done of the
roofs that were subject to having the insulation out into. We have no idea what the failure rate
was and this is a cover-up of grand proportions which can only be dealt with by having a full
inquiry and I think that the government should be honest and should say, alright we'll have
transparency and agree to support the private member's bill which Greg Hunt is going to bring
forward.

RICHARD MARLES: (Inaudible).

KIERAN GILBERT: Alright, we'll let, yeah Richard respond if you like before we move on.

RICHARD MARLES: Yeah, look I mean, the notion that this is a cover-up is patently ridiculous. We've
been ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: Then release the figures.

RICHARD MARLES: ... offering the Opposition, now we've been offering the Opposition ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: Release the figures.

RICHARD MARLES: ... comprehensive briefings on all of this which the Opposition has refused to take
...

BRONWYN BISHOP: It's not for the Opposition, it's for the people of Australia.

RICHARD MARLES: ... and instead has moved down this path ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: Absolutely.

RICHARD MARLES: ... now we've made it clear that the inspections that we've been doing in relation
to the non-foil insulation have not been random, they've been particularly targeted and so the
numbers that they come up with in terms of a failure rate will not be representative. It also is
going to do something to ...

BRONWYN BISHOP: People are entitled to know.

RICHARD MARLES: ... undermine the progress that we're making in terms of attacking those fraudulent
operators in the system and that's what our focus is on as well as safety. So, to talk about a
cover-up in circumstances where we've been offering a briefing, is very unfair.

BRONWYN BISHOP: It's not a briefing question, poor old Greg Combet, he might look like Clark Kent
but he ain't no superman, he's got to be transparent in this issue.

KIERAN GILBERT: Okay, let's move on, another issue. Peter Slipper, the Member for Fisher on the
Sunshine Coast in Queensland, he accepted, of course, the government's offer to become the Deputy
Speaker, apparently now facing some grassroots problems, Bronwyn Bishop, within his local division
of Fisher. Members, Liberal members, LNP members are calling for a meeting where they want to
express and vote on a no confidence motion in their local member. What can come of this? Is, can
there really be a revolt within the electorate? Or, I mean, Peter Slipper was elected and that's
pretty much it isn't it?

BRONWYN BISHOP: Well, the question is if people want to speak out in their conference they will do
so and I've seen some reports of that. Peter, of course, was the government's candidate, we put
forward Bruce Scott, the government and the Independents elected Peter Slipper. Peter has been true
to his word in saying he would vote with the Coalition and has done so. The question of endorsement
is one for the LNP at their highest levels. So, I guess they've made their point of view quite
clear but that doesn't stop people speaking in their conference and nor should it.

KIERAN GILBERT: Yeah, but is there a sense within the Liberal ranks that the people, you speak to
many people within the Liberal Party itself, that this is just a small example of broader sentiment
about Peter Slipper and his decision?

BRONWYN BISHOP: Well, I, as I said, we did put forward Bruce Scott and we were not successful in
his being elected. Peter Slipper was elected but he did say he would continue to vote with the
Coalition and has done so. And, so no doubt when the LNP looks at those issues they will see that
that's occurred.

KIERAN GILBERT: Okay, Richard Marles this is a difficulty for your new Deputy Speaker. Is it
something which you would assume would happen to any MP if they've decided to go with the other
side for a particular position?

RICHARD MARLES: Oh, well, I mean I think what we see here is the nature of the, the cut throat
nature of Liberal Party politics. There's certainly not a particular embracing of diversity on
their part but ultimately it's matter for the Liberal Party rank and file as to what they do. I
think the point that I would make is that in Peter Slipper but also in Bruce Scott and very much in
Harry Jenkins, I think you've got a team who are managing the Parliament well and they're
performing a very good role in what they are in terms of overseeing the House and the point that
Bronwyn made is right, the undertakings that Peter Slipper made to the Liberal Party he's honoured.

BRONWYN BISHOP: I think it's important to point out Kieran, that if a Labor Party person had done
what Peter Slipper did and accepted the nomination of the other side, he would've automatically
been expelled by the Labor Party. We have much more tolerant rules, shall I say.

KIERAN GILBERT: Yeah, that's a fair point actually but we'll leave it on that point. Bronwyn Bishop
thanks a lot for that this morning and Richard Marles appreciate your time as well.

BRONWYN BISHOP: Great pleasure to be with you.

RICHARD MARLES: Thanks, Kieran.

(c) Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2010

This work is copyright. Except to the extent of uses permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no person
may reproduce or transmit any part of this work by any process without the prior written consent of
the Parliamentary Librarian. This requirement does not apply to members of the Parliament of
Australia acting in the course of their official duties.

This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information
available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the
Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.

Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: web.library@aph.gov.au. Any concerns or complaints
should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to
discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this
service, clients may contact the author or the Library's Central Entry Point for referral.