Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Disclaimer: The Parliamentary Library does not warrant the accuracy of closed captions. These are derived automatically from the broadcaster's signal.
ABC News 24 10am News -

View in ParlView

(generated from captions) don't think it's a significant step to provide additional information. We'll leave that there for the moment. That was from Brisbane, just a short time delay on that. Lawyers for the 7-Eleven employees underpaid. The lawyers say by millions of dollars, calling for greater education of migrants who work in Australia. The Greens' leader Richard DiNatale has become a media conference. Let's listen in.We're having a series of round tables with the ultimate aim of a drug summit in the nation's Parliament so we can engage in the national conversation and start implementing some evidence-based measures. We know at this facility, needle and syringe exchange is very effective, a way of preventing the spread of blood borne viruses and a way of bringing people to a treatment centre where they can engage with health professionals and have access to treatment when they need it. We're also having a conversation about pill testing. Now pill testing is harm minimisation just as needle and syringe exchange is harm minimisation. The NSW Health Minister says that pill testing won't happen under his watch and he uses the same old tired arguments that we use when needle and syringe exchange was first introduced into Australia. It's the same arguments, this nonsense that somehow it condones drug use. It doesn't. What it does is it prevents harm. We've got young people overdosing and dying, because they're taking substances of unknown quality and purity and the consequence is we're losing people. Why wouldn't we put in place a measure that prevents those young people from ingesting potentially harmful substances, and keeps them safe. It makes perfect sense, it's the principle of harm minimisation here that we know works and it needs to be advanced through this public debate. I might just hand over to Lyn quickly to talk briefly about some of those issues and then we'll take questions on that and I'm happy to take further questions in a moment.We are really excited about the call for an improved approach to drug issues. We've watched for some time as communities work to try to deal with the needs of their children, their families. They're looking for access to treatment. They're looking for a guarantee that when people need help it's available for them. We know over the last few years there's been an increasing trend to look at this as a law enforcement issue. We know that's not working. Services like this one have a demonstrated track record in engaging with people who are using drugs in a way that supports them to get the help they most need. We look forward to the summit. We're looking forward to community leaders taking a stand in this area and making sure we really begin to move more towards the sort of responses that are more like what communities themselves want when members of their families are affected by drug use and the related harms. People are not helped by the rhetoric. What they're helped by is access to good quality health services in a timely way. We're very excited to be able to host this discussion today. Happy to take questions. I've got questions on other topics, if you're happy.No more on this one? Happy to take some more. Terrific. Have The Greens told the Government you're on board to pass Senate electoral reforms? The Greens have put forward our position on Lechtal voting reform. It's a long-held position. We had legislation introduced under Bob Brown to reform the voting system so we put power back in the hands of voters rather than backroom preference deals which is the current system. We've put forward our proposal to the Government which is that we abolish group voting tickets. That is those backroom preference deals and allow voters to make those preferences. We want a system where we ensure voters distribute at least six votes according to their own preference, not according to a backroom deal. We don't want changes to membership numbers, for political parties to make it harder for new parties to enter the Parliament. We've also suggested a few other proposals. For example, a voter or a registered officer for a political party can't control more than one political party and use that as an opportunity to funnel preferences. That's antidemocratic. We've put forward our position to the Government. We've said we have a long-standing position in this area and we've left that with the Government now. I understand they're considering changes and it will be a matter for them to decide whether they accept The Greens' proposals. When do you expect a bill to come to Parliament? That's a question for the Government. We put our position last week to the Government. Back - voters decide preferences not backroom operators and to make sure people's vote is reflected in the outcome. At the moment you can vote for the high taxes party and elect the low taxes party and vice versa. We don't have a democratic system where someone's vote is reflected in the outcome. We've said to the Government these are our basic non-negotiatable positions. We don't want changes that make it harder for small parties through increasing the membership threshold. We don't want a system of vote one, so small parties continue to be in the race for those positions. Ultimately as we want as a key reform outcome, we want to put power back in the hands of voters. The Government will decide what timetable it uses. It knows what our bottom line is. It's up to the Government to decide whether they support The Greens' proposal. How many extra seats do you predict The Greens could pick up under changes? We've done analysis and it's swings and roundabouts. If this electoral voting system was implemented in past elections there would have been occasionally elections where we would have lost people and others where we would have gained them. It probably makes little difference to the outcome for The Greens over the longer term, but it makes the voting system much more democratic. Does the Government's plans lead you to believe they're heading towards a double-dissolution election? That's a question for the Government. There is a lot of speculation about a double-dissolution election.