Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Disclaimer: The Parliamentary Library does not warrant the accuracy of closed captions. These are derived automatically from the broadcaster's signal.
Lateline Business -

View in ParlView

(generated from captions) they'll fix everything. They

had all the powers before, they

didn't fix everything. We are

putting all our eggs in one

basket, that concerns me, I

don't feel like I want the

safety and soundness of our

financial system resting on the

Fed getting it

Fed getting it right. President

Barack Obama is hoping to have

the new rules through Congress

and in place by the end of the year. How effective will the

from Washington by new rules be, we are joined

from Washington by economist

Centre for Economic and Policy Dean Baker, co-director for the Dean Baker, co-director for

Research, welcome to the

program Dean Baker. Thank for

having me on. Has Barack Obama

addressed the failings in the

system? Has he got it right? I

think he has part of it right.

There's a number of proposals

that will strengthen regulatory

power, one thing is it creates

a product safety commission -

that's not the right name, but

reviewing the safety of

mortgage products and other

product so consumers understand

them, it expands the pour of

the Fed over non-bank financial

institutions and a number of

steps in the right direction,

the big failing is that the big failing is that it

absolves the regulators of

personal failings, because we

had the regulatory

had the regulatory authority

necessary to prevent this

disaster and, in effect, by

saying the problem is the

regulations rather than the

regulators we are letting them

off the hook, and at the end of

the day the best set of

regulations will have to regulations will have to have

regulators to enforce them, if

we don't have the regulators

with a view this they have to

enforce them or face

consequence, the easiest thing

to do is not enforce them and

let the financial industry do to do is not enforce them and

what it wants, which is what

happened here. Is that failure

that you talk about, of regulatory enforcement

recognised by Obama, he talked

about how those whose job it

was to oversee the system

didn't have the authority they need, saying they were charged

with seeing the trees, not the

forest. Is there an

acknowledgment of failure of enforcement? I'm afraid there's

inadequate acknowledgment. I'll enforcement? I'm afraid there's

put it that way. The Feds had

all the power it needed to

prevent the housing bubble. It

shows it made a decision to

allow the housing bubble to

grow. I am not privileged to

their conversations, but I their conversations, but

assume they knew - I knew I was

talking about this back in talking about this back in '02,

it was easy to see we had a

housing bubble that grew to $8

trillion, it was inevitable it

would collapse and lead to

havoc for the economy. They had

the authority needed to reign

in the housing bubble but opted

not to, it was a failure of the

regulate ors more than the

regulation, regulation was

problemics, if you look at how problemics, if you look at

we dealt with AIG, we dealt

with it, bhab not the best

with it, bhab not the best way,

it was a huge insurance

company. It would have been

better to have resolution at

the Fed so it could have had an

orderly resolution of its

bankruptcy, they were able to

jury a nonbankruptcy to keep

worked out its the firm in business as they

liabilities. What do you say

about the fed makes the pointed

for pertinent that we heard in

the previous story, that is is

the Fed the right regulator to

have oversight of system-wide

risk? Well, there is no

alternative, that was the Fed's

responsibility, they recognised

that in '87 they intervened

when the stock market carkd. In

'98 they intervened in the long

term capital income. They term capital income. They have

not always had that

responsibility, they had that.

We are not giving them anything

knew, it's hard to envisage

anyone else doing that, if the

Fed is not on board it's hard

to commission you have a

commission of three or five

people as a systematic risk

regulator, that it would tell

the Fed what to do. The Fed has

to be on board, integrally

involved in that involved in that process. Did President Barack Obama go as

far as you thought he would, on

the one hand he talks about a

failure of the regulatory

architecture, on the other this architecture, on the other

would seem a long way from a

real rebuild of the system from

the top to bottom. Yes, I think

it's a relatively modest set of

proposals, again I like the product - financial product

safety commission, I think it's

a good thing. On issues like

restoring the break between investment banks and commercial banks this we used

banks this we used to have

until the late '90s, he didn't

do that, trying to address this

issue of into big to fail, many

people, including Paul Voecke

says we shouldn't allow banks

to be too big to stale, if they

are that big they shouldn't

exist, we should break them up.

It's modest. They are steps in

the right direction, it's not

the radical overhaul that may

be warranted under the

be warranted under the

circumstances. If it's not the

radical overhaul, does that

improve chances to get through

Congress, do you think it will

get through Congress. I think

it's a good chance. That's

President Barack Obama had his it's a good chance. That's what

eyes on, what can we get

through Congress, saying he

wants to get that this year,

leaders of the key committees,

Barney Frank in the House and

Senator Dodd. It was a bill

designed to pass

designed to pass quickly, I

think it does that, but the

cost is - it probably does cost is - it probably does not

go as far as it should. I want

to emphasise that it lets the

regulators off the hook, if

they don't feel they have to be

held accountable we'll have a

problem no matter what the

regulations are. Dean regulations are. Dean Baker,

thanks for your

insights. Thanks for having me

on.

Back home, and to the major

movers on our market today.

Rio Tinto dropped 9% shares

trading without the right to

the miner's recent share issue.

LNG sales from the Gladstone

product helped Santos at 3.5.

Macquarie best, rising 3% among

the banks. Babcock & Brown met

its demine, de-listed a

its demine, de-listed a week

after - demise, de-listed after

investors were told it was

unlikely they'd receive any

more of their money.

Strong ever greenback in New

York pushed oil blof $71 US a

barrel. Action loirs emboldened

by a surprise

by a surprise admission by wrongdoing by the Commonwealth

Bank in the lead up of the

collapse of Storm collapse of Storm Financial,

and are calling on the Bank of

Queensland and others to do the

same and demanding that all

banks negotiate in good faith

to ensure a speedy

settlement. Dark clouds have

been gathering around been gathering around the

Commonwealth Bank. Slammed for

raising mortgage rates last

week, this week it's

apologising for its role in the collapse

collapse of Storm

Financial. The stories that

have come forward from clients

of ours who were caught of ours who were caught by

Storm Financial would - they

are so sad, and any ray of hope

is welcome. Thousands have been

affected. Including Lance

Mayers, who took out a margin

loan through the Commonwealth

Bank. I was told I could

retire, and was virtually in

retirement mode when all

retirement mode when all this

went bad. So it's been a

struggle the last six months.

No income. The Commonwealth

Bank is now looking to make

life easier for customers life easier for customers like

Lance Mayers, by suspending

loan repayments until the end

of August. That action, and

admission of fault has come

ahead of the parliamentary

inquiry into the Storm collapse

that begins next week. The key

pbs for Commonwealth Bank pbs for Commonwealth Bank are,

of course, reputation -

problems for Commonwealth Bank

are reputational harm and

damage, it's been going on for

some time. The bank is some time. The bank is trying

to handle that. Secondly,

there's the real prospect of

litigation of Commonwealth Bank

and by this announcement we see

the Commonwealth Bank

endeavouring to minimise

potential potential litigation. The

Commonwealth Bank was not the only lender to

only lender to Storm clients,

the Bank of Queensland was also

heavily involved, but so far

has refused to admit any

wrongdoing. I would hope that

they will take a leaf out of Mr

Norris's book and announce

they'll sit down sensibly and

talk with us, because we are

not going away. Damian Scattini

is leading a 1300-strong class

action and is preparing his clients for a

clients for a drawn-out litigation process if the banks

refuse to come to the table, a process extending the pain for

those that have already lost

their life savings. You would

have thought who better to be

with than involvement with with than involvement with the

Commonwealth Bank. Yeah, Commonwealth Bank. Yeah, we've had been let down

severely. While the CBA copped

plenty of political flak for

raising its varnal rates,

raising its varnal rates, a

report from the Reserve Bank --

variable rates a report variable rates a report from

Reserve Bank shows margin fees

to all customers has fallen.

Business customers didn't Business customers didn't fare

as well, they are charged more

than before the financial

crisis, less competition is

starting to translate into

higher profits, average margins

across entire loan books across entire loan books rising

in recent months. The head of the Federal

the Federal Government's

inquiry into superannuation put

the industry on notice, Jeremy Cooper says he'll take a Cooper says he'll take a close

look at the complicated and

excessive fee structures

prevailing in a large part of

the industry, speaking a day

after the body after the body representing

retailed manage funds announced

a gradual move away from

commissions. Andrew Robertson reports.

In his first major address as

head of the superannuation inquiry, Jeremy Cooper

inquiry, Jeremy Cooper was

speaking to the people who

he'll be investigating, he

wasted no time grabbing their

attention. As Chair of the

Super and system Review my

number one priority is to

abolish fees in super. He was

joking, when the laughter stopped Jeremy Cooper had tough

things to say to the people who

ran the super industry. Fees

are too complex, high, too many

and too much ticket and too much ticket clipping,

Jeremy Cooper was scathing of

the traditional management fee

calculated of the percentage of

the dollar amount invested. The

investment management fees

increase rather than decrease

with the size of funds under

management. This is in spite of

the economies of scale that a

larger fund brings. This just doesn't feel like it's right

for super. The retail manage

the funds industry, though, is

not going to give up that cash

cow without a fight as it

indicated yesterday when

launching its version of the future of

superannuation. There's no way

that we can go in and say

people have to charge fixed dollar fees, for example, that

is, I think, swhaf of an

economic nonsense. Jeremy

Cooper said nothing in the

super industry would be sacred flagging competition or the

lack of it, the role of

trustees, default options trustees, default options and

whether or not there's a whether or not there's a need

for a greater consumer voice in

super, with super, with the global

financial crisis as a

backdropt, the inquiry will be

looking at the superannuation

sectors high exposure to equity

harkts. A direction welcomed by

the industry, smoking the

collapse of share markets

focussing attention on the need

to look at other classes such

as infrastructure. The industry

needs to change and the

framework, because the needs of

members are getting broader, we

have different types of

members, that is where the

challenge will be. The Jeremy

Cooper review of superannuation

begins on 1 July and will

report to the Government by 30

June next year.

June next year.

Australia's newest mining

company, albeit Chinese owned

MMG was launched today, the

holder of the Oz Minerals

assets bought last week by

China's Minmetals, while there

were smiles all around

Minmetals officials concede

resources market remains flat,

but they are keen to build on

$1.7 billion investment in Australia and position the

company for long term

growth. We think the market

will be flat in the next one or

two years. And it will take

time to recover. Once it

recovers demand will be

strong. The Federal Government

knocked back Minmetals's bid to

buy the Prominent Hill Mine on

national security ground. Vice-President of Minmetals

Vice-President of Minmetals and

project director or the Oz

Minerals deal is Mark Liu,

joining me from our Melbourne

studios earlier. Welcome

studios earlier. Welcome to

Lateline Business. Thanks. You

have officially launched MMG,

this deal is well and truly

done, it's not the deal you

wanted in the first place. You

picked up most of the Oz

Minerals assets, but not

perhaps the bestiun, prominent

hill. When you were stopped

hill. When you were stopped

from buying that on national

interest grounds, was there

about abandon ing the deal. I

think all along in all areas

outside of China, we adopt the

mentality whenever you do a

deal you must not look at what

is good for you, also what is

good for your counterparty. For

what the final structure of the

deal. I

deal. I think we end up is win,

win, not just for the two companies, but for companies, but for the

Australian Government and for

the Australian communities. I

wonder how both sides of this

transaction can have highly

paid advisors but miss the fact that Prominent Hill Mine, a

large asset was in a restricted

area and you wouldn't be able

to buy it on national security grounds,

grounds, how was that missed. I

haven't had a chance to ask my

advisors, so... Did it surprise

you. It was a surprise. you. It was a surprise. Again,

I think utmost at this point in

time, we'll be able to turn

around and restructure and represent it to Australian

Government and subsequently we

have endorsement and support

from Australian Government. A

lot has been written about

lot has been written about Chinese investment in

Australia, particularly after

the failure of the Chinalco bid

for Rio Tinto. Do you - I mean,

you have lived in Australia for

a long time. Do you detect a

hint of xenophobia in the

commentary. Yes, what I'm very

much sensitive on all the

critics, about Chinese

management. But all along, I think

think this - something is

challenge for management,

particular now for this new

company which has been company which has been revealed

to the public today, MMG, is

challenge to us to perform

beyond expectations, and all

around - also be able to answer

some critics, where we'll some critics, where we'll be able to address and deliver

what we have promised. I take

it from that then that you do

recognise, I guess, the concern

about a state-owned enterprise

as a shareholder versus is

purely commercial player, and I

wonder, if you like, how you

answer that, because in the

end, you are answerable to your

main shareholder, and that is a

sovereign Government with its

own sovereign interest. We own sovereign interest. We are

Chinese Government owned,

that's a fact, there's

that's a fact, there's no

denying about that, but we are

not Government controlled. We

have over-30 years Chinese

Government has driven this

reform - economic reform

policy. You'll probably see a

lot of company like ourselves,

Minmetals, coming to very much

commercialise. We are obey the

market practice, doctrines, we

market practice, doctrines, we

come to a country like

Australia, we will respect

their practice locally here,

the law, the standard to

regulations, that's really regulations, that's really what

we are here for. But

Government-owned but not

Government-controlled. That's a

fine line, isn't it. If I read

from the web site just today,

the web site of your parent, it

says, "In 1999 China Minmetals was listed

was listed among the 44 key enterprises with a great

bearing on National Security

and economic lifeline",

hypothetically down the track,

10, 15, 20, 30 years if there

is a global crisis with

commodity supply, will you then

become controlled by the

Government? I think from the

shareholder point of view what

I'm sensing is really we

I'm sensing is really we are

mandated to driving mandated to driving our commercial practice on economic

ground. At a time of crisis,

the commercial could be

outweighed or is likely to be

autoweighed by the political. I

have been working have been working with

Minmetals for over 10 years, I don't have that sense of

pressure from that. Where next

for MMG in this country? What

interests you. Our first

objective is to make

objective is to make sure that

the assets we have acquired

will be successful, we'll

deliver to the shareholders

what we have been commissioned

to, and that then how to grow

the company. So when you look

at growing MMG in this country,

are there particular

commodities that you wish to

focus on, are you mosh focused

on smaller assets or - more

focussed on smaller assets or

start ups. At the moment

nothing is excluded. It's the

first day MMG company has been

introduced on the way - we'll

have our first board meeting,

we'll have shareholders from

Beijing, and we are seeking

mandate from them. We are

looking what their looking what their expectations

of the company. At the moment,

certainly, from MMG point of

view nothing is excluded. How

deep are your pockets. You

spent over $1.5 billion, do you

have a lot more in the

kitty. That's something I have

addressed to the MMG staff and

also management. We cannot

expect a shareholder with

unlimited capital. We have

unlimited capital. We have to

make sure that we operate the

company very much stand-alone

to be able to operate the company on independent

basis. Does that mean in the

short term you won't be able to

go back to Beijing for more

money even if there is a good

deal on the table. It's not

necessary. Of course, if good

projects on the table and the

shareholder thing

shareholder thing is necessary

for further capital investment

I'm sure shareholder will look

closely at those issues. What

about the outlook more

generally, do you see demand as

being flat given the extent to

which a number of commodities

are stockpiled in China at the

moment. That's right, at the

moment we feel that stock

levels still high, on base metals,

metals, we are seeing positive

things in demand and return, we

expect the market to be

flattened for a while. How long

is quite a while. Well, quite a

while, maybe is few months. A

few months or years? I hope

it's not going to be a few

years. For everybody's sake, yes. Mark Liu thanks for

joining Lateline

Business. Thank you.

Business. Thank you. Professional athletes are

tonight celebrating an against

the odds come from behind

victory against the toughest

opponent of all - opponent of all - the

Australian Tax Office N a landmark decision the High

Court allowed them to claim

management fees as tax

deductions, today's decisions

signal full-time on a five year

battle brought by former Sydney

Swans AFL player David Spriggs

and former NRL player Mark

Riddell, in 2005 both claimed

deductions for fees paid to

management companies for

negotiating contracts and

sponsorship deals, we excuse

the puns. Tomorrow's business diary:

Before we go, a look at what

is making news in the business

sections of tomorrow's sections of tomorrow's papers,

The Sun looking at the launch

of MMG. The Australian leads on

Santos' LNG contract from the

Gladstone project. Gladstone project. Australian

The Financial Review examines a

shake-out of US financial

regulation, and Sydney wr -

says the Commonwealth Bank has

capped its exposure to Storm

Financial at $200 million.

That's all for tonight. As I

leave you the FTSE trading down

14 points, or 0.3 of 1%. The

Dow futures pointing to Dow futures pointing to on

opening up 3 points. If opening up 3 points. If you

want to review any part of the

program visit the web site

abc.net.au/latelinebusiness,

where you can watch the show

online or down load as a

vodcast. If you'd like to

vodcast. If you'd like to give

feedback email us. I'm Ali Moore, goodnight.

Closed Captions by CSI

# It's at times such as this she'd be tempted to spit # If she wasn't so ladylike # She imagines how she might have looked

# Back when legends and history collide # So she looks to her prince # Finding since he's so charming that, slumped at her side # Those days are recalled on the gallery wall

# And she's waiting for passion or humour to strike

# What shall we do, what shall we do # With all this useless beauty?

# All this useless beauty # She won't practice the looks of the great tragic books

# That were later disgraced to face celluloid # It won't even make sense but you can bet # If she isn't a sweetheart or plaything or pet # The film turns her into an unveiled threat

# Nonsense prevails, modesty fails

# Grace and virtue turned into stupidity # While the calendar fades # Almost all barricades to a pale compromise # And our leaders have feasts on the backsides of beasts

# They still think they're the gods of antiquity # If something you missed didn't even exist # It was just an ideal # Is it such a surprise? # What shall we do?

# What shall we do # All this useless beauty # Allll # All this useless beauty. # CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

UPBEAT MUSIC The crimes committed in the opera house are many and gruesome to behold.

Regicide, infanticide, and all the other forms of homicide are perpetrated nightly before the footlights. The threat of eternal damnation and darkness, more profound here than at any death metal concert. Opera also contains moments of extraordinary beauty, spiritual longing, hymns to forgiveness that have endured for hundreds of years and stretch into the world of future possibilities. My guest tonight is the premier American classical soprano of our time.

Simply one of the greatest singers one can hear today in any music. The star of the Metropolitan Opera House in New York and many other great opera houses and recital halls around the world,

her repertoire includes some of the most popular,

as well as some of the most challenging roles in operatic literature. Her recorded catalogue also includes albums of jazz ballads, Broadway songs, folk airs, and contemporary compositions. In 2008, she performed during the Beijing Olympics shortly before travelling to Stockholm to receive the Polar Music Prize in the company of this year's other laureates, The Pink Floyd. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Renee Fleming. CHEERING AND APPLAUSE Hi. For those that don't understand about the operatic voice, the trained voice isn't something obviously one is born with. You have to recognise the potential for it and then it has to be nurtured, to move forward you have to train. How was it that you discovered, or did somebody hear you singing and say that you have the potential to develop your voice in this way? Well, actually, my story is incredibly organic because my parents were both high school vocal music teachers so it would have almost have been strange if I didn't become a singer. I'm still paying back my debt, my musical education. And they... I think they, you know, are shocked

that I've actually done so well and I tried really hard to do other things. I tried to become a jazz singer, I wanted to be first lady president for a time, and I guess that job is still going to be open, and, ah...

Anything could happen But it's true. We say that the voice is 10%, and, you know, a lot of the best voices in the world

may be right in this room, right this second. There are voices that haven't been discovered. I mean, you may be unbelievable in the shower and just have not had someone say to you when you were maybe 16 or maybe younger and said, "Gosh, you're loud," or "Gosh, that's really beautiful. You should taking singing lessons." Of course people have been saying that to me until even recently but it takes, you know, it really takes an extraordinary amount of development and training, it's true, on top of the instrument which has to be there, that's a given. When you first discovered your voice, did you look at the repertoire, there were some things that you were fearful of? Well I was a fearful singer. I'm not innately a performer.

I didn't grow up with that personality. In fact, all through high school I was more likely to have my throat closed on stage than anything else and just produce a "Ahhhhh." And this went on for a long time. It was only perseverance that kept me at it. But I loved the practice room and I loved learning about music and about singing. And you're right, I choose from 400 years of music to perform and that's endlessly exciting and fascinating.

I think the people that are not familiar with the range of opera, maybe just one or two pieces of music that they know, don't necessarily appreciate that the voice that one uses for Verdi is not the same voice as one uses for Monteverdi. I mean there's years, they were very different, and that singers have to be mindful of when they approach certain roles, there is just the matter of fatigue, how much singing there is to be done

and they can wreck their voice by... Are there roles in soprano literature that have the same fear to them? Absolutely. You have to choose repertoire that suits you personally, so there's the whole issue of, is it too heavy, is it too big, because the most important distinction between us and other kinds of singers is that we're not amplified. There is no microphone on stage at The Metropolitan Opera,

and it's a house that seats 4,000 people and we sing over an orchestra. So this issue of whether or not something is too big or not is incredibly important. And then it's also the quality of your voice, the range, the median range. There's so many different elements which go into choices for repertoire. Now, I've sung 51 roles already. I just counted them recently so I think I should retire.

Whoo, that's a lot.

Or maybe just repeat a few, because of all the classical musicians, our careers are the shortest. The voice doesn't last as long as someone, Horowitz could play the piano or any number of conductors, they never retire, they just keep going. They nail them to the podium. Exactly. The Metropolitan Opera is Renee's artistic base, as she has said,

and people speak critically sometimes of these institutions

throwing around words like 'elitism'.

I'm not sure they take into account the relative price of some rock'n'roll concerts. And you're at a pinnacle in terms of profile, in terms of your role at the Met. I mean, right now I think if you look around New York, you're on the side of taxi cabs and buses.

I mean, it's like you're in Sex and the City. Is it.. It's pretty wild. I have to say it's a bit... It must be very wild. I was walking the dog yesterday and saw two people staring at the poster on the subway station and I kind of put my head down. But then of course my hair fell across my eyes and I thought, "Oh no, now I really do like the poster. This is, you know..." But it's a big responsibility and you mention something about it

in terms of just preserving the voice that I think is something that people in rock'n'roll don't have to do so much. There is the element of the sponsorship, it's a huge thing. It's a hugely expensive art form. We have the backstage, the expense of the productions, the orchestra, and we only seat, you know, 2,000-4,000 people so ticket sales definitely are not going cover it. There's no huge tour.

And only recently is there... are these HDTV broadcasts

which are in local theatres, movie theatres all over the world and that's really making a huge difference, that's outreach. And what's happened to opera that is so fascinating is that now we're held to the same dramatic standards as any actor, whether on television, film, or in any venue or on the stage

because we're meant to look like our characters, within reason, and behave like them. My goal as a singer is to make the audience actually forget that I'm singing. If I'm doing my job right, if you're so involved in the story, that later on you think, "That was an opera," even through the foreign language because I sing in eight foreign languages, not including two versions of Elvish from the Lord of the Rings, that was interesting, LAUGHTER and we have to learn all this style and these different... The training goes on and on and then I'm in a costume. I wore a costume a couple years ago that was 8 feet wide. I mean, to get in the door I had to do a three-point turn. So we have all these challenges but it is expensive. Some productions, I mean, there are many infamous stories about disasters in the opera but there are disasters in all forms of theatrical performance. I mean, I saw a friend of mine singing Carmen who's 6 foot tall and, you know, in order for her to be eye to eye

with her rather diminutive Don Jose she was singing half of the opera kind of prone on the table or he would appear in a window or halfway up a staircase. I know, I've been there. And also the... And the lunge attack. You have to bend your knees as you come in close to the shorter tenor. What is that? The lunge attack? Yes, the lunge. "Darling, I love you and I'm trying to be shorter than you." But we were just laughing backstage trying to remember... You know, my favourite opera story of all time is actually from Tosca, which I'm going to sing, which is that, and this is true, which is that the director, there was no time to rehearse

and they had a whole new group of supers, which are extras, and he said, "You're soldiers, you follow Tosca. You just completely follow her til the end of the act." Well, Tosca jumps off the parapet and commits suicide so sure enough, she jumped off and they all followed her, 20 guys jumped off. The aria that you are going to sing is a very beautiful and well-known piece. Can you tell us, for those who don't know it, the background? Tosca is a famous singer and she's in love with a painter, and this is about the Revolution actually, and what happens is that the local and evil chief of police covets her and so he takes her lover into custody and he says, "I'm going to kill him." He's torturing him in front of her and he says, you know,

"I'm going to kill him unless you sleep with me," and she, of course, before any heinous act in opera whether it's rape, or death, or suicide, there's a beautiful aria. I mean it just comes with the... Before Romeo and Juliet die they both have to sing and then they wake up and sing again. So in this case she sings one of the most beautiful arias in all of the repertoire because she says and it's, the text, "I live for love, I've lived for art, I have been generous to the poor, I've given my jewellery, to make them shine brighter." and I have sung to the stars I done to deserve this? I love that line and, "What have Why, why is this happening to me?" And then she kills him. Well, I can't do anything else. LAUGHTER would you sing it for us? Well, before you kill him,

Absolutely. This is Vissi D'Arte. CHEERING AND APPLAUSE # Vissi d'arte

# Vissi d'amore # Non feci mai male # Ad anima viva!

# Con man furtiva

# Quante miserie conobbi # Aiutai # Sempre con fe sincera # La mia preghiera # Ai santi tabernacoli sali # Sempre con fe sincera # Diedi fiori # Agl'altar

# Nell'ora del dolore