

- Title
JOINT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT
20/08/2008
Effects of the ongoing dividend on smaller public sector agencies
- Database
Joint Committees
- Date
20-08-2008
- Source
Joint
- Parl No.
42
- Committee Name
JOINT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT
- Page
- Place
Canberra
- Questioner
- Reference
Effects of the ongoing dividend on smaller public sector agencies
- Responder
- Status
Final
- System Id
committees/commjnt/11159/0000
Next Fragment
-
JOINT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT
(Joint-Wednesday, 20 August 2008)-
McPHEE, Mr Ian
CHAPMAN, Mr Steve
Mr Chapman
Mr ROBERT
Mr McPhee
CHAIR
Mrs Rimington
Senator HOGG
RIMINGTON, Mrs Dianne
Senator LUNDY -
Prof. McMillan
Mr ROBERT
BRENT, Mr Ronald (Ron)
Senator FEENEY
McMILLAN, Professor John
Mr Brent
CHAIR
JEPSON, Ms Jill
Senator HOGG
Senator LUNDY -
Mr Lowe
Senator FEENEY
CHAIR
MORISON, Mr Bob
Mr Bergman
Mr ROBERT
LOWE, Mr Peter
BERGMAN, Mr David -
Senator FEENEY
Senator LUNDY
CHAIR
DYMOND, Dr Tim
Senator HOGG
Mr Jones
Mr ROBERT
JONES, Mr Stephen -
CARNELL, Mr Ian
Senator HOGG
CHAIR
Mr ROBERT
Mr Carnell -
SMART, Mr Jeff
Mr Smart
HARRIOTT, Mr Grahame
Mr ROBERT
Senator FEENEY
Mr Phelan
Mr Foster
PHELAN, Mr Andrew
CHAIR
FOSTER, Mr Richard
Mr Harriott -
ROEDIGER, Ms Julie
Mr Kettle
ALLBON, Dr Penny,
Mr ROBERT
Senator FEENEY
Ms Roediger
Dr Allbon
CHAIR
KETTLE, Mr Andrew -
Mr Elder
Mr Harris
Mr ROBERT
Mr Pereira
Senator FEENEY
CHAIR
ELDER, Mr David
PEREIRA, Mr Doug
HARRIS, Mr Ian, AO
Senator HOGG
WRIGHT, Mr Bernard -
Mr Kenny
Mr ROBERT
Senator FEENEY
Mr Thompson
KENNY, Mr David
CHAIR
THOMPSON, Mr Alan
KONIG, Ms Judy
Ms Konig
Senator HOGG
-
McPHEE, Mr Ian
Joint committee
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
Effects of the ongoing dividend on smaller public sector agencies
Final
CHAIR (Ms Grierson) —I declare this meeting open. This is the first hearing of the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit for its inquiry into the effect of the efficiency dividend on small agencies. The efficiency dividend was established 20 years ago. From the submissions made to the inquiry, it is clear that agencies take their budgetary responsibilities very seriously. It is also clear that agencies have sought to improve their processes and be more efficient under the dividend. In addition, the submissions demonstrate to the committee that agencies are keen to have a say on how the dividend affects them and their ability to provide their services. Further, it appears that some small agencies are now cutting services due to the prolonged effect of the dividend. This is a claim that the committee takes very seriously, and that is why we are here today.
Our nation has defined many aspects of its democracy by establishing these small agencies. Examples are the courts, the Auditor-General, the Ombudsman, the parliamentary departments and the Electoral Commission. Adequacy of funds for these agencies is always seen as essential for a healthy democracy. Today the committee will be meeting many of these agencies and discussing how the efficiency dividend has affected them.
[9.20 am]