

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2004-07
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
-
General Business
- Notice given 9 December 2004
- Notice given 7 March 2005
- Notice given 10 May 2005
- Notice given 11 May 2005
- Notice given 16 June 2005
- Notice given 17 August 2005
- Notice given 6 September 2005
- Notice given 8 September 2005
- Notice given 4 October 2005
- Notice given 30 November 2005
- Notice given 2 December 2005
- Notice given 7 February 2006
- Notice given 29 March 2006
- Notice given 16 August 2006
- Notice given 17 August 2006
- Notice given 12 September 2006
- Notice given 13 September 2006
- Notice given 28 November 2006
- Notice given 7 December 2006
- Notice given 7 February 2007
- Notice given 21 March 2007
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged, Laid Aside or Negatived
-
Questions on Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 16 November 2004
- Notice given 17 November 2004
- Notice given 19 November 2004
- Notice given 23 December 2004
- Notice given 10 March 2005
- Notice given 17 March 2005
- Notice given 18 March 2005
- Notice given 3 May 2005
- Notice given 4 May 2005
- Notice given 21 July 2005
- Notice given 18 August 2005
- Notice given 29 August 2005
- Notice given 14 September 2005
- Notice given 15 September 2005
- Notice given 5 October 2005
- Notice given 5 January 2006
- Notice given 18 January 2006
- Notice given 16 February 2006
- Notice given 27 March 2006
- Notice given 4 May 2006
- Notice given 9 May 2006
- Notice given 6 June 2006
- Notice given 8 June 2006
- Notice given 16 June 2006
- Notice given 14 July 2006
- Notice given 19 July 2006
- Notice given 28 July 2006
- Notice given 31 July 2006
- Notice given 8 August 2006
- Notice given 9 August 2006
- Notice given 15 August 2006
- Notice given 16 August 2006
- Notice given 17 August 2006
- Notice given 24 August 2006
- Notice given 28 August 2006
- Notice given 31 August 2006
- Notice given 6 September 2006
- Notice given 18 September 2006
- Notice given 21 September 2006
- Notice given 4 October 2006
- Notice given 17 October 2006
- Notice given 18 October 2006
- Notice given 19 October 2006
- Notice given 31 October 2006
- Notice given 6 November 2006
- Notice given 7 November 2006
- Notice given 8 November 2006
- Notice given 9 November 2006
- Notice given 10 November 2006
- Notice given 13 November 2006
- Notice given 14 November 2006
- Notice given 15 November 2006
- Notice given 17 November 2006
- Notice given 20 November 2006
- Notice given 21 November 2006
- Notice given 23 November 2006
- Notice given 24 November 2006
- Notice given 28 November 2006
- Notice given 29 November 2006
- Notice given 30 November 2006
- Notice given 1 December 2006
- Notice given 4 December 2006
- Notice given 6 December 2006
- Notice given 7 December 2006
- Notice given 8 December 2006
- Notice given 12 December 2006
- Notice given 14 December 2006
- Notice given 18 December 2006
- Notice given 22 December 2006
- Notice given 12 January 2007
- Notice given 15 January 2007
- Notice given 17 January 2007
- Notice given 23 January 2007
- Notice given 25 January 2007
- Notice given 29 January 2007
- Notice given 1 February 2007
- Notice given 5 February 2007
- Notice given 6 February 2007
- Notice given 8 February 2007
- Notice given 15 February 2007
- Notice given 20 February 2007
- Notice given 22 February 2007
- Notice given 23 February 2007
- Notice given 26 February 2007
- Notice given 27 February 2007
- Notice given 28 February 2007
- Notice given 1 March 2007
- Notice given 7 March 2007
- Notice given 8 March 2007
- Notice given 14 March 2007
- Notice given 16 March 2007
- Notice given 20 March 2007
- Notice given 21 March 2007
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- A Guide to the Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 23 January 2007
2967 Senator Milne: To ask the Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation—With reference to the Minister’s announcement on 4 December 2006 that Gunns Limited will be paid $2.6 million to assist in the development of a pulp mill feasibility study and preliminary engineering works:
(1) How much of the $2.6 million will go towards: (a) funding the study; and (b) the preliminary engineering works.
(2) Has the study been completed; if not, when will the study be completed.
(3) When will the study be made available to the public.
(4) What is involved in the preliminary engineering works.
(5) Have the preliminary engineering works begun; if not, when will they commence.
(6) Why has the Minister agreed to provide funding for preliminary engineering works for the pulp mill when the construction of the pulp mill has not been approved.
(7) Will the Minister request that the funding for the preliminary engineering works be re-funded if the pulp mill is not approved; if not, why not.
2968 Senator Allison: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs—
(1) Can the Minister confirm that participants at the Maralinga nuclear tests must independently prove that they were at the tests in order to be eligible for the new white cards; if so, why is this the case given that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has ruled that the published document of the preliminary nominal roll was sufficient evidence that they were present.
(2) Does the Government now dispute the fact that those on the roll were present at the tests; if so, on what basis.
(3) If the Government has taken the position that the Epidemiology Studies (Confidentiality) Act 1981 restricts the use of the roll for such purposes, is it the case that this restriction does not apply once the relevant study is completed.
(4) To date, how many: (a) veterans have been issued with white cards; and (b) applications have been made for white cards.
(5) What is the average length of time taken to process applications.
(6) Are veterans who were on ships providing services to the tests entitled to white cards; if not, why not.
(7) How many veterans received: (a) an act of grace compensation; and (b) Comcare compensation, for leukaemia prior to the closure of those schemes.
(8) Given the number of veterans found in the study to have leukaemia, is the Government considering reinstating these schemes; if not, why not.