

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2002-03
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
-
General Business
- Notice given 14 February 2002
- Notice given 11 March 2002
- Notice given 16 May 2002
- Notice given 26 June 2002
- Notice given 19 August 2002
- Notice given 22 August 2002
- Notice given 16 September 2002
- Notice given 19 September 2002
- Notice given 24 September 2002
- Notice given 17 October 2002
- Notice given 24 October 2002
- Notice given 12 November 2002
- Notice given 13 November 2002
- Notice given 9 December 2002
- Notice given 18 March 2003
- Notice given 25 March 2003
- Notice given 16 June 2003
- Notice given 17 June 2003
- Notice given 18 June 2003
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged, Laid Aside or Negatived
-
Questions on Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 12 February 2002
- Notice given 15 March 2002
- Notice given 8 April 2002
- Notice given 18 April 2002
- Notice given 19 June 2002
- Notice given 2 July 2002
- Notice given 10 July 2002
- Notice given 11 July 2002
- Notice given 22 July 2002
- Notice given 15 August 2002
- Notice given 20 August 2002
- Notice given 13 September 2002
- Notice given 17 September 2002
- Notice given 23 September 2002
- Notice given 24 September 2002
- Notice given 15 October 2002
- Notice given 1 November 2002
- Notice given 7 November 2002
- Notice given 8 November 2002
- Notice given 11 November 2002
- Notice given 12 November 2002
- Notice given 21 November 2002
- Notice given 26 November 2002
- Notice given 29 November 2002
- Notice given 3 December 2002
- Notice given 10 December 2002
- Notice given 11 December 2002
- Notice given 13 December 2002
- Notice given 7 January 2003
- Notice given 14 January 2003
- Notice given 17 January 2003
- Notice given 3 February 2003
- Notice given 17 February 2003
- Notice given 25 February 2003
- Notice given 27 February 2003
- Notice given 10 March 2003
- Notice given 14 March 2003
- Notice given 18 March 2003
- Notice given 20 March 2003
- Notice given 25 March 2003
- Notice given 27 March 2003
- Notice given 2 April 2003
- Notice given 8 April 2003
- Notice given 14 April 2003
- Notice given 16 April 2003
- Notice given 17 April 2003
- Notice given 22 April 2003
- Notice given 7 May 2003
- Notice given 30 April 2003
- Notice given 2 May 2003
- Notice given 5 May 2003
- Notice given 6 May 2003
- Notice given 7 May 2003
- Notice given 9 May 2003
- Notice given 13 May 2003
- Notice given 14 May 2003
- Notice given 15 May 2003
- Notice given 19 May 2003
- Notice given 22 May 2003
- Notice given 27 May 2003
- Notice given 30 May 2003
- Notice given 2 June 2003
- Notice given 4 June 2003
- Notice given 5 June 2003
- Notice given 6 June 2003
- Notice given 10 June 2003
- Notice given 11 June 2003
- Notice given 13 June 2003
- Notice given 16 June 2003
- Notice given 17 June 2003
- Notice given 18 June 2003
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- A Guide to the Daily Notice Paper
- A Guide to the Full Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 30 April 2003
1419 Senator Ludwig: To ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General—
(1) (a) How many staff currently hold: (i) ongoing, and (ii) non-ongoing, positions in the Human Rights Branch; and (b) what is the Australian Public Service (APS) level of these positions.
(2) (a) How many ongoing and non-ongoing staff based elsewhere in the department are working on human rights matters; and (b) what is the APS level of these staff.
(3) (a) Which positions are currently vacant in the Human Rights Branch; and (b) how long have they been vacant.
(4) Since the additional estimates hearings in February 2003, how many staff have left the Human Rights Branch.
(5) What is currently the average period of service of staff in the Human Rights Branch.
(6) Since the additional estimates hearings in February 2003, what has been the absentee rate for: (a) sick leave (including workers compensation leave); (b) annual leave; (c) miscellaneous paid leave; and (d) long service leave, in the Human Rights Branch, and in the department as a whole.
(7) What involvement did the Human Rights Branch have in the development of the Australian Human Rights Commission Bill 2003.
1420 Senator Ludwig: To ask the Minister representing the Attorney-General—
(1) How was the tender for the review of copyright reforms advertised.
(2) When was it advertised.
(3) How many tenders were submitted.
(4) How was the winning tender selected.
(5) What qualifications in copyright law, including legal, technical and economic aspects, was the Government looking for in the winning tender.
(6) Does the law firm of Phillips Fox have an interest or specialise in copyright law; if so, can details be provided.
(7) Where is the law firm Phillips Fox located.
(8) How many employees of Phillips Fox will be working on the review process.
(9) What is the total cost tendered for by the law firm Phillips Fox for the review of copyright reforms.
(10) Can a copy be provided of the tender submitted by Phillips Fox.
(11) What outcomes are expected from the review.
(12) When will the review be completed.
(13) Does the Government have any input into the review process performed by the law firm Phillips Fox.
(14) What qualifications does the law firm Phillips Fox have in the economic and technical aspects of copyright law.