Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document


Previous Fragment    Next Fragment

Notice given 24 January 2003

Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1131-1133)—In relation to the Southport Lagoon Conservation Area, which is a Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) reserve listed on the Indicative Register of the National Estate:

(1) Does the Minister agree that the Tasmanian Government has committed a major breach of the RFA by approving a road through this reserve; if not, why not.

(2) What action has been taken to protect the reserve, to stop any further work on the road and to rehabilitate the damage.

(3) What mechanisms are in place to alert the Minister to breaches of the RFA such as this.

(4) When did the Minister become aware that the RFA had been breached.

(5) Will the Minister commence action to terminate the RFA on the grounds of this major breach.

1131 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage

1133 Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage

Senator Brown: To ask the Ministers listed below (Question Nos 1134-1137)—

(1) (a) What permanent committees with members from outside the public service advise the Minister on energy policy; and (b) for each committee can the following information be provided: (i) the committee’s terms of reference, and (ii) a list of its members, their terms of appointment, and the  institutions or organisations to which they belong.

(2) (a) What temporary or ad hoc committees have advised the Minister on energy policy in the past 5 calendar years; and (b) for each committee can the following information be provided: (i) the committee’s terms of reference, and (ii) a list of its members, their terms of appointment, and the  institutions or organisations to which they belong.

1134 Minister representing the Prime Minister

1140  Senator Allison: To ask the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts—Given that, according to the foreword and annexes of the new Radiation Protection Standard RPS3 - Maximum Exposure Levels to Radiofrequency Fields - 3 kHz to 300 GHz, approved by Dr John Loy on 7 May 2002, research papers indicate adverse health problems from extremely low levels of radiofrequency (RF) energy, which have been neither confirmed nor denied:

(1) How will the Australian Communications Authority (ACA) handle these uncertainties when it integrates the levels specified in the standard into the regulatory framework.

(2) Will there be references in the regulations to: (a) the research papers; (b) the precautionary measures contained in clause 5.7(e) of the standard; and (c) the annexes at the back of the standard.

(3) Why has the ACA used only selected parts of the RF standard in regulating the mobile phone and broadcasting industries.

(4) What protection is now offered regarding occupational exposure to workers in these industries since the sections relating to occupational exposure have not been taken up by ACA.

(5) Why did the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency agree to selective use of parts of the standard.