FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE REFERENCES COMMITTEE—REFERENCE

Senator Johnston, pursuant to notice of motion not objected to as a formal motion, moved business of the Senate notice of motion no. 3—That the following matters be referred to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee for inquiry and report by 1 May 2011:

 (a) all details concerning the Department of Defence's Request for Tender (AO/014/09) for the provision of air support to the Middle East Area of Operations, and other aviation contracts let by the Commonwealth, to ensure that value-for-money will be achieved, including:

  (i) the adequacy of the due diligence process around the choice of potential suppliers from Standing Offer Panels and, more specifically, whether there was existing or any subsequently discovered evidence to warrant non-selection of any of the panel members, or whether the information obtained should have resulted in further inquiry and investigation,

  (ii) the requirements of tenders and how effectively these will be met,

  (iii) whether the preferred respondent decision was influenced by any vested interests, outside influences or any other perceived or actual conflicts of interest,

  (iv) the role of departmental personnel in the tender processes and their adherence to the Commonwealth's procurement policy, as well as any conflict of interest issues arising from the tender process and if any perceived or actual conflicts were declared,

  (v) the methodology and adequacy of the decision processes and whether the services to be supplied in the contract were determined on the basis of objective and supportable, current and likely future requirements or were structured so as to unfairly advantage a particular respondent,

  (vi) the integrity of governance around the development of Requests for Tender and the subsequent evaluation process, and whether the governance arrangements achieved their intended purposes, including the processes to manage perceived and actual conflicts of interests,

  (vii) whether the governance arrangements were adequate and in fact did ensure that there were no perceived or actual conflicts of interest, for any people involved in the lead-up to the decision to tender, and during the tender review, assessment and supplier selection processes, and

  (viii) whether the respondents, including directors and other key personnel (whether employees, agents or contractors nominated in the tender response) for the proposed contracts, are fit and proper for the purpose of contracting with the Commonwealth and the adequacy and methodology of this process; and

 (b) the adequateness and appropriateness of the processes in determining:

  (i) whether the respondents and associated companies supplying services to the respondents have the financial and commercial capacity to deliver the services submitted in their responses,

  (ii) whether respondents have the capacity to deliver the services submitted in their responses to a quality and standard that meets the requirements of the Commonwealth and its regulatory authorities and, if so, whether the department was fully satisfied with the services provided by their appointed foreign carrier when they last provided such services (Request for Tender AO/014/09),

  (iii) whether the department is in a position to guarantee the security status of all foreign personnel involved in the air-transportation of troops between mainland Australia and its deployment base adjacent to a war zone (Request for Tender AO/014/09),

  (iv) whether issues relating to respondents, or their related companies of their contracts in South Africa are such as to warrant their exclusion for consideration on ethical or probity grounds (Request for Tender AO/014/09), and

  (v) any other matters relevant to the probity of the procurement processes and the respondents, including the appointment of a permanent and independent probity auditor to oversee the awarding of all aviation contracts by the Commonwealth.

Question put and passed.