Download PDF Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Senate Journal No. 13 - 23 November 2010
- 1 MEETING OF SENATE
- 2 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS
- 3 CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- 4 ORDER OF BUSINESS—REARRANGEMENT
- 5 TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
- 6 QUESTIONS
- 7 MOTION TO TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- 8 PETITION
- 9 NOTICES
- 10 LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- 11 POSTPONEMENTS
- 12 NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY BILL 2010 (NO. 2)
- 13 LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE—LEAVE TO MEET DURING SITTING
- 14 HEALTH—GST AGREEMENT—PROPOSED VARIATION—ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- 15 BROADCASTING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (ANTI-SIPHONING) BILL 2010
- 16 LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS REFERENCES COMMITTEE—REFERENCE
- 17 ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE—REFERENCE
- 18 ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE—PROPOSED REFERENCE
- 19 ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE—REFERENCE
- 20 POSTPONEMENT
- 21 DEFENCE—EXERCISE HAMEL
- 22 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS—UNPAID OVERTIME
- 23 DISCUSSION OF MATTER OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE—COMMUNICATIONS—NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK
- 24 LAW AND JUSTICE—GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS—MINISTERIAL STATEMENT—DOCUMENTS
- 25 EDUCATION—BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION—COST DATA—ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS—DOCUMENT
- 26 COMMUNICATIONS—NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK—ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS—DOCUMENT
- 27 FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION—AUSTRALIAN CIVILIAN CORPS BILL 2010
- 28 COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
- 29 FISHERIES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2010
- 30 TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) BILL 2010E INCOME TAX RATES AMENDMENT (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) BILL 2010
- 31 TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CONFIDENTIALITY OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION) E BILL 2010
- 32 LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE—REPORT—EVIDENCE AMENDMENT (JOURNALISTS' PRIVILEGE) BILL 2010 AND EVIDENCE AMENDMENT (JOURNALISTS' PRIVILEGE) BILL 2010 (NO. 2)
- 33 TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
- 34 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS—CONSIDERATION
- 35 ADJOURNMENT
- 36 ATTENDANCE
HEALTH—GST AGREEMENT—PROPOSED VARIATION—ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSSenator Cormann, pursuant to notice of motion not objected to as a formal motion, moved general business notice of motion no. 121—That the Senate— (a) notes that: (i) the Government has refused to provide the information requested by the Senate in relation to advice to Government about the requirement for unanimous agreement from all parties to change the GST arrangements, (ii) the Government did not justify its refusal by pointing to a recognised public interest ground and by explaining any harm to the public interest from releasing that information, (iii) both the 1999 Intergovernmental Agreement on the Reform of Commonwealth-State Financial Relations (GST Agreement) as well as the Intergovernmental Agreement on Federal Financial Relations in 2008 require unanimous agreement from all parties to make any changes to GST arrangements, (iv) there is no unanimous agreement to change the GST arrangements, and (v) in its Incoming Government Brief, Treasury advised the Government that `Western Australia has indicated that it is not prepared to agree to proposed amendments to the IGA notwithstanding that they preserve the current arrangements for Western Australia' and that `as changes can only be made to the IGA by unanimous agreement of all parties, alternative approaches may need to be considered to give effect to the financing arrangements for other jurisdictions'; (b) orders again that there be laid on the table by 5 pm on Thursday, 25 November 2010, any advice (including legal advice and advice from the Solicitor-General or the Australian Government Solicitor) to the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet or the Department of the Treasury, or advice from these departments to their respective Ministers, concerning the need for unanimous agreement to vary GST arrangements; (c) notes the agreements between the Government and other parties and independents to refer disputes about public interest disclosures to the Information Commissioner, who will arbitrate on the release of documents; and (d) orders that, if the Government does not produce the information required by this order within the specified timeframe, there be laid on the table by 15 December 2010, a report on the matter by the Information Commissioner, including a review of the adequacy of the grounds specified by the Government for its refusal to produce the information and, if applicable his arbitration on the release of the information.
The Senate divided— AYES, 34 Senators— Adams Back Barnett Bernardi Birmingham Boswell Boyce Brandis Cash Colbeck Coonan Cormann Ferguson Fielding Fierravanti-Wells Fifield Fisher Heffernan Humphries Johnston Kroger Macdonald Mason McGauran Minchin Nash Parry (Teller) Payne Ryan Scullion Troeth Trood Williams Xenophon NOES, 32 Senators— Arbib Bilyk Bishop Brown, Bob Brown, Carol Cameron Collins Conroy Crossin Farrell Feeney Forshaw Furner Hanson-Young Hogg Hurley Hutchins Ludlam Ludwig Lundy Marshall McEwen (Teller) McLucas Milne Moore Polley Pratt Sherry Siewert Stephens Sterle Wortley Question agreed to. | |