

- Title
BILLS
Landholders' Right to Refuse (Coal Seam Gas) Bill 2011
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-09-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Page
6803
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Brown, Sen Bob
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/fab7f92c-00c9-4a5f-be69-4f49ac44396a/0017
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Asylum Seekers
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Superannuation
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Asylum Seekers
(Brandis, Sen George, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Coal Seam Gas
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Asylum Seekers
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Pensions and Benefits
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Asylum Seekers
(Back, Sen Chris, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Carbon Pricing
(Madigan, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband
(Furner, Sen Mark, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Asylum Seekers
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Financial Services and Superannuation (Question No. 57)
(Johnston, Sen David, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 896)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities: Program Funding (Question No. 917)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
National Water Commission (Question No. 920)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities: Accommodation (Question No. 923)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 925)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Emergency Short Message Service (Question No. 1034)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1055)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Northern Territory Communities: Swimming Pools (Question No. 1086)
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government: Staffing (Question No. 1162)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Sherry, Sen Nick)
-
Financial Services and Superannuation (Question No. 57)
Page: 6803
Senator BOB BROWN (Tasmania—Leader of the Australian Greens) (11:52): by leave—We have a general agreement in the Senate that private members' time, because it is short, will be organised so that the primary piece of legislation being brought on each week for discussion will be brought to a vote. What we have just seen is that fail to happen.
Senator Cormann: Are you saying that I am not allowed to speak?
Senator BOB BROWN: Yes, I am. Senator Cormann, you are interjecting against the standing orders. I am saying you should organise, within the ambit of a commitment from your side as well as everybody else's, to have an orderly arrangement whereby a vote is taken in private members' time. What you are otherwise saying, Senator Cormann, is that you do not want opposition bills coming to a vote in the chamber. If that is your position, that is new. Let us know about it. The same goes for the government.
Senator Cormann: My position is that, if want to speak, I should be allowed to speak.
Senator BOB BROWN: Your position is that you do not want any action, Senator Cormann. It is obvious from the contribution you were giving why that is the case. I am just saying to the government and the opposition that this is a breach of spirit by both sides and it ought to be brought back into order. Otherwise private members' time goes back to being of no significance—government bills get through; private members' bills do not get through. That is not proper in this place.