

- Title
BILLS
Marriage Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2012
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
20-09-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
7456
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Stage
Marriage Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2012
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/f12702a2-dfed-4af1-ba05-32a4c0133aaa/0011
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
BILLS
-
Marriage Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2012
-
Second Reading
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Boyce, Sen Sue
- Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter
- Stephens, Sen Ursula
- Humphries, Sen Gary
- Madigan, Sen John
- Thorp, Sen Lin
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Furner, Sen Mark
- Williams, Sen John
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Hogg, Sen John
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Fawcett, Sen David
- Farrell, Sen Don
-
Second Reading
-
Marriage Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2012
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Budget
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians
(Brown, Sen Carol, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Mining
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Vocational Education and Training
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Building Better Regional Cities
(Payne, Sen Marise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration
(Polley, Sen Helen, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Defence Personnel
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Qantas
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Carbon Pricing
(McKenzie, Sen Bridget, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Investment
(Gallacher, Sen Alex, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Budget
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1941)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1942)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1943)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1944)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1945)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1946)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1947)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1948)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1949)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1950)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 2093)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 2095)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 2099)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 2110)
(Edwards, Sen Sean, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 2111)
(Edwards, Sen Sean, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Housing (Question No. 2117)
(Payne, Sen Marise, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 2135)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 2136)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Kokoda Track (Question No. 1941)
Page: 7456
Senator RONALDSON (Victoria) (10:50): This debate is not about the right to love or the right to be loved, because both rights are undeniable and irrevocable. The debate is about the definition of 'marriage' under the Marriage Act. I strongly believe that marriage is between a man and a woman and I strongly believe that the definition under the Marriage Act should not be changed. I oppose this bill.