

- Title
BILLS
Family Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment (Schoolkids Bonus Budget Measures) Bill 2012
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-05-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
3117
- Party
Ind.
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/edb45988-55dc-4a02-8239-a916040eb623/0100
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Budget
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Budget
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Budget
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Housing Supply and Affordability
(Payne, Sen Marise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Education Funding
(Polley, Sen Helen, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Economy
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Aviation
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
National Disability Insurance Scheme
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Budget
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Broadcasting Services Amendment (Regional Commercial Radio) Bill 2012, Fair Work Amendment (Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry) Bill 2012
- Corporations Amendment (Future of Financial Advice) Bill 2012, Corporations Amendment (Further Future of Financial Advice Measures) Bill 2012
- Customs Amendment (Anti-dumping Improvements) Bill (No. 2) 2012, Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2012
- Customs Tariff Amendment (Schedule 4) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No. 1) Bill 2012
- Health Insurance Amendment (Professional Services Review) Bill 2012
- Migration Legislation Amendment (Student Visas) Bill 2012
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1304)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1581)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1582)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1583)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1584)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 1594)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 1595)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 1601)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Hospitality (Question Nos 1609 and 1611)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Overseas Travel (Question Nos 1612 to 1614)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1625)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1627)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1628)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1630)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research (Question No. 1722)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (Question No. 1723)
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Health Services Union (Question No. 1728)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Muckaty Land Trust (Question No. 1785)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1304)
Page: 3117
Senator XENOPHON (South Australia) (13:37): I will make a very brief contribution on the Family Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment (SchoolKids Bonus Budget Measures) Bill 2012, because on such an important piece of legislation it is important that the record is made clear. I will be supporting the second reading of this bill but not the third reading. I do so for this reason: as a general principle I think it is important to support parents in the area of schoolkids' education expenses. I am a supporter of government assistance where it is needed. One of the functions of government is to provide financial assistance to help those in need meet basic living expenses. So in that respect the principle is not a bad one. Increasing the level of assistance to families for schoolkids' expenses is a laudable principle.
I object to the bill in its current form and I cannot support the third reading of the bill because of the way it is being handled, because this is just a blank cheque, in a sense. A voucher system would have been much more preferable—the system that was in place previously—because it would limit the possibility of some parents, a small minority of parents, rorting the system. In some cases that does happen and we ought to acknowledge that. But there is also the general principle of ensuring that, if this is about schoolchildren and their educational expenses, this money ought to be spent directly for the kids' educational expenses, not by means where there is no accountability. That is why I think this bill in its current form is flawed. The government ought to have stuck with the voucher system; if it had, I would have supported this bill.
In summary, I do support the principle that there should be additional assistance to families, but if it is targeted specifically to educational expenses for schoolchildren then it ought to be via a voucher system rather than a system which does not have any reasonable measure of transparency or accountability.