

- Title
MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
Asylum Seekers
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
15-08-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
5400
- Party
Nats
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Williams, Sen John
- Stage
Asylum Seekers
- Type
- Context
MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/9c427010-0933-4aac-ae6b-ecf1d4f90dc4/0144
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- BILLS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- MOTIONS
-
COMMITTEES
- Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- Environment and Communications Legislation Committee
- Electoral Matters Committee
- Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee
- Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Committee
- Community Affairs References Committee
- Community Affairs References Committee
- MOTIONS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- FIRST SPEECH
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- PETITIONS
- CONDOLENCES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1558)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1809)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australia Post (Question No. 1866)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Question No. 1870)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Question No. 1871)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (Question No. 1872)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research (Question No. 1874)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
World Health Organisation (Question No. 1879)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health and Ageing (Question No. 1881)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question Nos 1886 and 1887)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Treasury (Question No. 1888)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Resources and Energy (Question No. 1889)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1897)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Climate Change (Question No. 1902)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian National University Student Union (Question No. 1903)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1905)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1907)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1910)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1911)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1914)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Building and Construction Industry Improvement Amendment (Transition to Fair Work) Bill 2012 (Question No. 1916)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1921)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No, 1922)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1923)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1924)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1925)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1928)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Defence: Procurement (Question No. 1934)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Defence: Heavy Landing Incident (Question No. 1936)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet (Question No. 1951)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (Question No. 1952)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health and Ageing (Question No. 1953)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Burma (Question No. 1954)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Resources and Energy and Tourism (Question No. 1955)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1957)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Minister for Foreign Affairs: Statement of Interests (Question No. 1958)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (Question No. 1962)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (Question No. 1963)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (Question No. 1964)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Resources and Energy (Question No. 1966)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1558)
Page: 5400
Senator WILLIAMS (New South Wales—Nationals Whip in the Senate) (16:45): Can I start with Senator Polley's words about turning the boats back. Let me quote the now Prime Minister, Ms Julia Gillard. The Australian people must also be wondering what is going on when the Prime Minister, and people like Senator Polley, are saying today, 'You can't turn the boats back,' when in 2002, when Ms Gillard was in opposition, she said:
And we think turning boats around that are seaworthy, that can make the return journey and are in international waters, fits in with that.
Ms Gillard was saying turning the boats around, when it was safe to do so, fits in. Of course, prior to the 2007 election, the then opposition leader Mr Rudd, the politically decapitated Mr Rudd, said, 'Turn the boats back when safe to do so.' So we have got the now current Prime Minister saying that, we have got the former, politically decapitated Prime Minister, Mr Rudd, saying the same, and now we have got these people saying, 'No, you can't do that.'
This whole asylum seeker industry has become one big tragedy. Last Saturday week I was with the deputy opposition leader, the Hon. Julie Bishop, up in the New England area at Tenterfield, a great place where Henry Parkes and others sat down to help establish the Federation. It is the birthplace of Peter Allen. It was very interesting as I showed Ms Bishop around Henry Parkes's museum there. He was an interesting man—he had three wives and 18 children and obviously had quite an exciting life. What a great contribution he made to our nation. But Ms Bishop was telling us that when the Labor government was elected in 2007 there were just four people in detention centres in Australia. Just four! And then, in August 2008, the then Prime Minister Mr Rudd at the request of the previous opposition immigration minister Ms Julia Gillard said, 'We will change the rules. We will do away with the Pacific solution,' a solution that the Howard government had brought in under the careful guidance of the Hon. Mr Philip Ruddock. The coalition had a problem and found a solution. This government had the solution and you turned it into a disastrous problem. What have we seen? More than 20,000 asylum seekers have arrived since August 2008. We have seen 386 boats. At the last election—you would remember it well, Madam Acting Deputy President Boyce—the then Prime Minister Ms Gillard said, 'We will do a deal with East Timor.' She told all of Australia, 'We will do a deal with East Timor.' It was just that she did not happen to tell East Timor. So then it was, 'We will do a deal with Malaysia.' It was not a very good deal: 'You take 800 of our asylum seekers and we will take 4,000 of your refugees.' Eight hundred for 4,000—that is not a very good deal either. Of course, the High Court put an end to the so-called solution that the Gillard government had in relation to asylum seekers. It was the end of that when the High Court handed down its decision. So now we see the government, under the Houston recommendations, adopting Nauru. I do not know how many times Mr Abbott has said it.
How many times did Mr Abbott say, 'Pick up the phone to Nauru'? Hopefully, the facility will be back in working condition soon. Hopefully, those people who traffic in human beings for money, putting their lives at risk, will be brought to a stop. Some 22,000 people have come to this country seeking asylum on boats since the introduction of this government. Some figures say four per cent of these people lose their lives. We are talking 800 to 900 people who may have drowned at sea making this dangerous journey to our country. That industry must be shut down.
I am very fortunate to live in a beautiful country town where we have refugees from Sudan who have come to our town and become established there. They are really good people. One lady came there with four children. Her husband was murdered. I think her brother was also murdered. She got a life again, a new start in a lovely country town like Inverell, where the people have made them most welcome, where they are good citizens and where their children are being educated, getting work and going off to university. That is an ideal result—looking after those in refugee camps, those who are threatened, not those who are paying their way to come here. I find it amazing when we see boatloads of people coming and seeking asylum and they are all men. The boat is full of men. What, the women and their children are not seeking asylum? What is going on here? These are the people paying to come here. The industry must be stopped. I think it is certainly good that the government has now adopted the Nauru solution. It has worked before; it will work again. I know this is embarrassing for members of the government who have resisted this in arrogance for so long. But now we are getting steps that hopefully lead to this industry being shut down—lives will be saved and we can continue our compassionate settlement of proper refugees.