

- Title
MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
Asylum Seekers
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
15-08-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
5392
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Back, Sen Chris
- Stage
Asylum Seekers
- Type
- Context
MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/9c427010-0933-4aac-ae6b-ecf1d4f90dc4/0140
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- BILLS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- MOTIONS
-
COMMITTEES
- Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- Environment and Communications Legislation Committee
- Electoral Matters Committee
- Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee
- Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Committee
- Community Affairs References Committee
- Community Affairs References Committee
- MOTIONS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- FIRST SPEECH
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- PETITIONS
- CONDOLENCES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1558)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1809)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australia Post (Question No. 1866)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Question No. 1870)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Question No. 1871)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (Question No. 1872)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research (Question No. 1874)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
World Health Organisation (Question No. 1879)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health and Ageing (Question No. 1881)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question Nos 1886 and 1887)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Treasury (Question No. 1888)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Resources and Energy (Question No. 1889)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1897)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Climate Change (Question No. 1902)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian National University Student Union (Question No. 1903)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1905)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1907)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1910)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1911)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1914)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Building and Construction Industry Improvement Amendment (Transition to Fair Work) Bill 2012 (Question No. 1916)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1921)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No, 1922)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1923)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1924)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1925)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1928)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Defence: Procurement (Question No. 1934)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Defence: Heavy Landing Incident (Question No. 1936)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet (Question No. 1951)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (Question No. 1952)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health and Ageing (Question No. 1953)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Burma (Question No. 1954)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Resources and Energy and Tourism (Question No. 1955)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1957)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Minister for Foreign Affairs: Statement of Interests (Question No. 1958)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (Question No. 1962)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (Question No. 1963)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (Question No. 1964)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Resources and Energy (Question No. 1966)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1558)
Page: 5392
Senator BACK (Western Australia—Deputy Opposition Whip in the Senate) (16:11): This particular acceptance represents for the government, and for the now Prime Minister Ms Gillard, a most disappointing reversal and embarrassment. But it is all the fault of one person—that is, the Prime Minister herself.
It was as shadow minister that Ms Gillard came up with the now infamous statement, 'Another boat, another policy failure.' Very rarely did she or her staff ever have to trouble the press gallery with that particular statement. More importantly, it was during the period in which the Hon. Philip Ruddock was the minister that he invited and subsequently took then shadow minister Ms Gillard to Nauru, where she had every opportunity to observe for herself the success of the program instituted by the coalition in response to a need. The coalition then, as the coalition now, had and has a plan to stop the boats.
Worse than that, then Deputy Prime Minister Gillard was part of a group that dismantled a policy that was working. There is nothing worse in the Australian democratic system than to have ideology replace good policy; it inevitably comes back to bite you, and it has on this occasion. Since I began working in this chamber, early in 2009, this side of the chamber has suffered the scorn, disdain and ridicule of what was a successful coalition policy by the now government. They have to eat humble pie, because they were the makers of that pie and they were the bakers of that pie.
When she became the Prime Minister of this country, it was Ms Gillard who said that one of her key priorities was to fix up border protection. We know that she has not. She has lost control of our borders; a fundamental priority for the Prime Minister of any country. Six weeks ago, she outsourced—fortunately to an eminent group of three consultants—the job of advising her, because her own ministers could not and she did not accept the advice of the coalition. This is advice that we have been so often willing to provide to the government. I believe our leader, Mr Abbott, has suggested on more than 100 occasions the very solution that now is being proposed for this place. As our then coalition Prime Minister Mr Howard said, 'We will decide who comes to this country.'
We have not yet got the full restoration of the policy that worked for Australia and worked for genuine refugees. That is a three-plank policy. The first plank is the use of Nauru and Manus Island, which of course now the government, embarrassedly, has had to come back to ask us to accept, and I believe it is the intention that the coalition will. The second and third are temporary protection visas and a policy to turn the boats back when it is safe to so do. These form the three planks of the policy. In the absence of the second two we cannot be confident that we are actually going to see a successful outcome.
Air Vice Marshal Houston and his team have indicated that they agree with the concept of turning the boats back when it is prudent to do so. The Sri Lankan government has even pleaded with this government to do the same thing. We would say the same. We know that naval personnel support that particular element.
What has happened as a result of five years of the failure of this government to continue a policy of the coalition which worked? The first, of course, has been the regrettable death of at least 600 people drowned at sea that we know about. Of course, there are probably more than that and there may be more than those into the future, particularly as on a daily basis those boats are putting to sea in the middle of winter.
The second has been a massive cost blow-out at a time when the budget can ill afford the blowing out of costs as a result of other profligate spending by this Labor government and its mismanagement. The third is a loss of confidence by the Australian community, and gross embarrassment in the Australian community, in what has become a laughing stock internationally—our border protection policy. And in so doing, of course, making fools of the Australian Navy—it now being said throughout the Asian region that the Australian Navy has become the people-smugglers' taxi service. Who can be proud of that sort of criticism in the region? Yet it is this government that has led to that level of embarrassment.
Lastly but not least is the fact that genuine refugees as a result of this mismanagement of the Labor government have been left to rot in refugee camps around the world at a time when, as we know, they should have been coming into this country under our very, very generous refugee program. Recent surveys point to the concern by Australians that we want to see people come through the right and correct channels. It has been this failure to do so that has caused so much concern. (Time expired)