

- Title
BILLS
Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Bill 2012
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-11-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
9514
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Stage
Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Bill 2012
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/8c264796-9a16-462c-8fff-2c57d7357f38/0112
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Superannuation Laws Amendment (Capital Gains Tax Relief and Other Efficiency Measures) Bill 2012, Superannuation Auditor Registration Imposition Bill 2012
- Tax Laws Amendment (Clean Building Managed Investment Trust) Bill 2012
- Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No. 5) Bill 2012
- Corporations Legislation Amendment (Derivative Transactions) Bill 2012
- Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Bill 2012
- Superannuation Legislation Amendment (New Zealand Arrangement) Bill 2012
- Freedom of Information Amendment (Parliamentary Budget Office) Bill 2012
- Judicial Misbehaviour and Incapacity (Parliamentary Commissions) Bill 2012, Courts Legislation Amendment (Judicial Complaints) Bill 2012
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Corruption
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Murray-Darling Basin
(McEwen, Sen Anne, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Economy
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Murray-Darling Basin
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Prime Minister
(Brandis, Sen George, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Vocational Education and Training
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Asylum Seekers
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Intellectual Property Rights
(Madigan, Sen John, Lundy, Sen Kate)
-
Corruption
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
- Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Bill 2011
- National Health Security Amendment Bill 2012
- Superannuation Legislation Amendment (MySuper Core Provisions) Bill 2012
-
Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Amendment Bill 2012
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Rhiannon, Sen Lee
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Third Reading
- Dental Benefits Amendment Bill 2012
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 9514
Senator CORMANN (Western Australia) (13:20): The Personal Liability for Corporate Fault Reform Bill 2012 is part of the process to introduce sensible reforms to the laws imposing liability on a director for acts or omissions of their companies. We do not oppose this bill; it was Peter Costello, of course, who began the hard work to introduce reforms to this area of overregulation. It was a coalition government that tried to bring some sensible reform to this area of Commonwealth law.
The Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee reported to the then Treasurer in September 2006. That committee recommended a principled and consistent approach to personal liability across the various jurisdictions. This was taken up by COAG and is reflected in this bill.
The reform aims to harmonise the imposition of personal criminal liability for corporate fault across Australian jurisdictions; to remove regulatory burdens on directors and corporate officers that cannot be justified on public policy grounds, and there should be more of that; and to minimise inconsistencies between Australian jurisdictions.
Given that the changes have been agreed through a COAG process and are supported by stakeholders as an improvement to the status quo, the coalition do not oppose this bill. We do believe that more work needs to be done in relation to laws which reverse the onus of proof and/or impose strict liability, but that might be a debate for another day.