- Parliamentary Business
- Senators and Members
- News & Events
- About Parliament
- Visit Parliament
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013
- Parl No.
- Question No.
Farrell, Sen Don
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013
- System Id
Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Table Of ContentsDownload Current Hansard View/Save XML
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny)
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Carr, Sen Bob)
(Brandis, Sen George, Wong, Sen Penny)
Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny)
National Disability Insurance Scheme
(Singh, Sen Lisa, McLucas, Sen Jan)
(Sinodinos, Sen Arthur, Wong, Sen Penny)
Literacy and Numeracy
(Wright, Sen Penny, Lundy, Sen Kate)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Lundy, Sen Kate)
- Carbon Pricing
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- Publications Joint Committee
- Regulations and Ordinances Committee
- Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee
- Community Affairs References Committee
- National Disability Insurance Scheme Bill 2013, Royal Commissions Amendment Bill 2013
- Maritime Powers Bill 2013, Maritime Powers (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2013, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2013, International Tax Agreements Amendment Bill 2013, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Recognition Bill 2013, Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Improving Electoral Procedure) Bill 2013, National Disability Insurance Scheme Bill 2013, Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2012-2013, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2012-2013, Higher Education Support Amendment (Further Streamlining and Other Measures) Bill 2013, Royal Commissions Amendment Bill 2013, Television Licence Fees Amendment Bill 2013, Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Improving Electoral Administration) Bill 2013, Fisheries Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2013, Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Amendment Bill 2013, Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Convergence Review and Other Measures) Bill 2013, Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Finance) Bill 2013, Completion of Kakadu National Park (Koongarra Project Area Repeal) Bill 2013, Customs Amendment (Anti-Dumping Commission) Bill 2013, Customs Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2013
- Tax Laws Amendment (Countering Tax Avoidance and Multinational Profit Shifting) Bill 2013
- Asbestos Safety and Eradication Agency Bill 2013
- Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013
- Parry, Sen Stephen (The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
- Domestic Violence
- National Apology for Forced Adoptions
- Ready Flowers
- International Conference on Population Development
- Institute of Public Affairs 70th Anniversary, Thatcher, Baroness Margaret
- Chisholm Electorate
- New South Wales Labor Government
- Defence Reserves: Employer Support Payment Scheme
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
Senator FARRELL (South Australia—Parliamentary Secretary for Sustainability and Urban Water) (12:43): I table a revised explanatory memorandum relating to the bill and I move:
That this bill be now read a second time.
I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in Hansard.
The speech read as follows—
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION AMENDMENT BILL 2013
The government has now introduced amendments that will create a new matter of national environmental significance under national environmental law. This amendment will enable the Commonwealth Environment Minister to take into account significant impacts of coal seam gas and large coalmining development on a water resource.
These amendments are the product of a long period of engagement with the community, as well as with members of this parliament who have been strong in their advocacy of this issue.
The challenge we have had up until now is that people quite reasonably expect the Minister for the Environment and Water to take into account, by law, the impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining on water resources. They want to know that the Environment Minister is considering: if there is an irreversible depletion and contamination of our surface and groundwater resources; the impacts on the way critical water systems operate; and the related effects on our ecosystems.
But, under our current national environment law, the Commonwealth Environment Minister cannot take these concerns into consideration directly, because the Commonwealth does not directly regulate projects that are likely to have an impact on a water resource—either surface water or groundwater. This is because water resources are not currently a matter of national environmental significance.
Under our current laws, the only way the Environment Minister can take these issues into consideration is where there is a connection to an existing matter of national environmental significance.
For example, that connection may be to a threatened species which is legally listed but may be a hundred kilometres away downstream of the project. If there is an impact on that species downstream, only then can the Environment Minister take account the impact the project is having on that water source, to the extent that it affects the listed species.
The Australian government has already taken steps to provide more certainty for regional communities around coal seam gas and large coalmining developments, and the protection of water resources.
Last year we established the independent expert scientific committee under national environment law, to provide independent expert scientific advice to all governments on the water related impacts of coal seam gas and large coalmining.
The independence of the expert committee provides the community with the confidence they need that the scientific work being done has the integrity that people want.
However, when that advice comes back, the Environment Minister can only take that information into account if it is having that flow-on effect to an existing matter of national environmental significance.
The amendment does not seek to invoke the Commonwealth in all water decisions. The trigger will not capture small projects such as farm dams. The amendments will create a new matter of national environmental significance for coal seam gas and large coalmining developments which are likely to have a significant impact on a water resource. It will provide the strong legal basis for protection that the community wants.
In addition, the Bill includes an amendment to prevent states and territories from being accredited to make approval decisions in relation to the water trigger.
This is not a broad trigger. The Australian government has already established independent expert scientific committee, which considers coal seam gas and large coalmine developments. This amendment provides the appropriate gateway for federal approval, and should continue to do so.
The amendments also deal with the transition to the new trigger.
There are a number of projects that have already been referred under national environment law which are already undergoing assessment. The government thinks it would be a perverse outcome if every project already in the system was finished without taking account the new matter of national environmental significance.
This is why the amendments provide that, for any project that is already undergoing assessment, provided the Independent Expert Scientific Committee has not yet given its advice and a proposed decision on the project has not yet been made, the new trigger will apply.
This does not mean that the assessment will need to begin again and completely restart for those projects that are captured.
We know that the sort of information that would be needed to make a decision for the new matter of national environmental significance already gets collected in different ways for state approvals, and for the work of the independent expert scientific committee.
The Commonwealth environment department is contacting proponents to advise them of any additional information requirements which may apply, the same way they frequently seek additional information, so that the full impacts of those projects on water resources can be assessed.
Since the introduction of the amendments into the House of Representatives, the Australian Government has consulted with industry and community stakeholders.
The government will continue to engage industry and stakeholders in the lead-up to, and following the commencement of, the amendments, should they be passed by the Parliament. This will include providing guidance on the application of the new environmental law to their projects, such as the likely information requirements.
Up until now Australia's Environment Minister has not been able to take into account this information, which is already being collected. The information is provided and analysed but does not currently form part of the decision-making process. Under the new trigger, it will.
It means that when an approval is given or an approval decision is made, the community expectation that the Environment Minister has taken into account the impacts on water resources will match up with the legal obligations of environment minister.
At the same time, the Australian government is making sure that the administrative processes for the transition are done in a way that delivers better scrutiny and gives better-quality and more thorough decisions, without needlessly adding to time frames. I commend the bill to the Senate.