- Parliamentary Business
- Senators and Members
- News & Events
- About Parliament
- Visit Parliament
Clean Energy Finance Corporation Bill 2012
- Parl No.
Williams, Sen John
McLucas, Sen Jan
- Question No.
Urquhart, Sen Anne
Clean Energy Finance Corporation Bill 2012
- System Id
Table Of ContentsDownload Current Hansard View/Save XML
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
- Start of Business
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Lundy, Sen Kate)
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Carr, Sen Bob)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Wong, Sen Penny)
(Wright, Sen Penny, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
Department of Human Services
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Carr, Sen Kim)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny)
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Wong, Sen Penny)
(Cameron, Sen Doug, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
- Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- Shipping Reform (Tax Incentives) Bill 2012, Shipping Registration Amendment (Australian International Shipping Register) Bill 2012, Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Bill 2012, Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (Shipping Reform) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No. 3) Bill 2012, Income Tax (Seasonal Labour Mobility Program Withholding Tax) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (Income Tax Rates) Bill 2012
- Corporations Amendment (Future of Financial Advice) Bill 2012, Corporations Amendment (Further Future of Financial Advice Measures) Bill 2012
- Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee, Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Legislation Committee
- Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee
- Clean Energy Finance Corporation Bill 2012
- Clean Energy Legislation Amendment Bill 2012, Clean Energy (Customs Tariff Amendment) Bill 2012, Clean Energy (Excise Tariff Legislation Amendment) Bill 2012
- Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2012-2013, Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2012-2013, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2012-2013
- Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2012
- Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Stronger Super) Bill 2012, Superannuation Supervisory Levy Imposition Amendment Bill 2012
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Monday, 25 June 2012
Senator URQUHART (Tasmania) (13:36): I rise to speak in favour of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation Bill 2012—a bill that will establish the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Clean Energy Finance Corporation Special Account and that appropriates funds to that account. The Clean Energy Finance Corporation will be a $10 billion fund that will provide a new source of finance for the development or commercialisation of Australian based clean energy technologies and projects. This includes renewable energy technologies, low-emission technologies and energy efficiency projects.
All we have heard from the opposition today is negativity, and all we ever hear from the opposition about transitioning to a low-carbon economy is negativity. After Senator Joyce's contribution, I would like to share with the Senate today the story of Chicken Little's adventure. Once upon a time there was a tiny, tiny chicken named Chicken Little. One day Chicken Little was scratching in the garden when something fell on her head. 'Oh,' cried Chicken Little, 'the sky is falling. I must go and tell the king.' So Chicken Little ran and ran, and she met Henny Penny. 'Where do you travel so fast, Chicken Little?' asked Henny Penny. 'Ah, Henny Penny,' said Chicken Little, 'the sky is falling, and I must go and tell the king.' 'How do you know that the sky is falling, Chicken Little?' asked Henny Penny. 'I saw it with my eyes, I heard it with my ears, and a bit of it fell on my head,' said Chicken Little. 'I will go with you to the king,' said Henny Penny. So they ran along together, and they met Ducky Daddles. 'Where do you travel so fast?' asked Ducky Daddles. 'Ah, Ducky Daddles,' said Chicken Little, 'the sky is falling, and Henny Penny and I go to tell the king.' 'How do you know that the sky is falling, Chicken Little?' asked Ducky Daddles. 'I saw it with my eyes, I heard it with my ears, and a bit of it fell on my head,' said Chicken Little. 'I will go with you to the king,' said Ducky Daddles. So they ran along together, and they met Goosey Loosey. 'Where do you travel so fast, Chicken Little?' asked Goosey Loosey. 'Ah, Goosey Loosey,' said Chicken Little, 'the sky is falling. Henny Penny and Ducky Daddles and I go to tell the king.' 'How do you know that the sky is falling, Chicken Little?' asked Goosey Loosey. 'I saw it with my eyes, I heard it with my ears, and a bit of it fell on my head,' said Chicken Little. 'I will go with you,' said Goosey Loosey. So they ran along together, and they met Turkey Lurkey. 'Where do you travel so fast, Chicken Little?' asked Turkey Lurkey. 'Ah, Turkey Lurkey,' said Chicken Little, 'the sky is falling, and Henny Penny and Ducky Daddles and Goosey Loosey and I go to tell the king.' 'How do you know that the sky is falling?' asked Turkey Lurkey. 'I saw it with my eyes, I heard it with my ears, and a bit of it fell on my head,' said Chicken Little. 'I will go with you to the king,' said Turkey Lurkey. So they ran along together, and they met Foxy Loxy. 'Where do you travel so fast, Chicken Little?' asked Foxy Loxy. 'Ah, Foxy Loxy,' said Chicken Little, 'the sky is falling, and we go to tell the king.' 'Do you know the way to the king's house?' asked Foxy Loxy. 'No,' said Chicken Little. 'No,' said Henny Penny. 'No,' said Ducky Daddles. 'No,' said Goosey Loosey. 'No,' said Turkey Lurkey. 'Then come with me and I will show you,' said Foxy Loxy. Just as he was about to lead them into his den to eat them, the sky fell on him. 'Oh dear,' said Chicken Little. 'We're too late,' said Henny Penny.
Senator Williams: Madam Acting Deputy President, I rise on a point of order. Is this a chamber of fairytales or are we actually debating an issue? I draw your attention to the issue of relevance. This is not a preschool, although some on the other side seem to act like preschool students. Can you draw the issue of relevance to Senator Urquhart's attention?
Senator McLucas: On the point of order, Madam Acting Deputy President: we had a presentation from the Leader of The Nationals which we allowed to continue. People talk about fairytales, but there were a lot of fairytales told by him, too. I think that Senator Urquhart is making a debating point and I suggest that there is no point of order.
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT ( Senator Pratt ): Senator Urquhart, I am sure you will draw this story to a conclusion and come back to the bill.
Senator URQUHART: I will, Madam Acting President. Those listening can draw their own conclusions about the connection between Henny Penny's adventure and the opposition's rhetoric on pricing carbon. I thought that was a much easier story to follow than the story we heard from Senator Joyce in his presentation.
As we are all aware, manufacturing in Australia is under pressure from the resource-fuelled high Australian dollar and overseas competition as the manufacturing industries in our big Asian trading partners mature. But Australian manufacturers and manufacturing workers want to do their part for the environment and for the future, and they realise the opportunities that our changing world presents. Australia is a late starter in the transformation to clean technology due to its access to low-cost fossil fuels. Current global financial conditions, the complex nature of Australia's electricity markets, the cost of renewable energy and the preference of investing institutions for listed assets inhibit the financing of the clean energy sector.
Unfortunately, traditional avenues of finance can often be out of reach for companies looking to make sustainable capital investments in their operations and to commercialise innovative products. The corporation is a mechanism to help mobilise investment in renewable energy, low-emission and energy efficiency projects and technologies in Australia. The corporation will finance Australia's clean energy sector using financial products and structures to address the barriers currently inhibiting investment. Ultimately, Australian manufacturing will get ahead of the game because of the government's willingness to back them in making this important transition. Shell Global CEO Peter Voser rightly noted on ABC TV's 7.30 program last Thursday, '
... Shell as a company is actually very much advocating that we need a price for carbon on a worldwide basis ...we take a very long-term view that the carbon will be priced ...
Global carbon pricing will occur. Smarter, greener technologies and manufactured goods will emerge around the globe. Australia is uniquely placed to capitalise on first-mover advantage by making sure our manufacturers are equipped to produce and are capable of producing solar cells and windmills and the associated infrastructure, and it is necessary to assist producers get their products to market while meeting the demands of a low-carbon future and changing consumer patterns.
We cannot afford to miss this opportunity because our banks and other finance companies are not prepared or able to back Australian innovation and know-how. In terms of lifting our manufacturing industry's competitiveness and getting ahead of the game on a global scale, the Clean Energy Finance Corporation is an essential piece of the picture. This transformation will require substantial capital which the private sector alone may not be able to provide. I am a member of the Senate's Economics Legislation Committee, which held an inquiry into this bill. Submissions to the inquiry all supported the creation of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation. In its submission to this inquiry, the Clean Energy Council suggested that the challenge of developing new energy technologies is not unique to the clean energy sector. The council argues:
... other technologies such as coal and gas generation have enjoyed decades of public support to get to where they are today.
Some level of government support is warranted when long-term investments requiring large amounts of capital are needed to kick-start promising first-of-kind technologies. In the clean energy sector specifically, the Clean Energy Council indicates:
To overcome current market constraints and accelerate commercialization and deployment of low carbon technologies, support is needed in the construction of financial transactions in a way that will enable use of conventional capital markets products such as debt financing, private equity, venture capital and capital from longer term equity investors (like superannuation funds) at an affordable cost.
While all the evidence received by the committee supported the concept of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, there were a range of options shared to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics. In its evidence to the committee, Treasury stated that it was not aware of concerns from either the finance sector or the green energy sector about how the framework for the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, as contained in the bill, has been designed. I quote:
There is a spectrum of views: 'We need to do it now and we need to do it quickly' to 'We should do more' to some sectors that question the need for the corporation. So there is a broad spectrum of views, but the bill ... reflects the findings of the expert review panel into the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, which was chaired by Jillian Broadbent. Also on that panel were Ian Moore and David Paradice. All three members have extensive experience within the financial sector and the corporate sector.
In its submission to the inquiry, Hydro Tasmania stated that the Clean Energy Finance Corporation offers significant opportunity to build on Hydro's established capabilities in the renewable energy sector. As they are the largest clean energy producer in Australia, I am inclined to listen to them rather than the negativity espoused by those opposite. As a well-established clean energy producer, Hydro Tasmania is continuing to invest in additional renewable energy as well as in the maintenance, upgrade and refurbishment of their existing hydro assets. Hydro concluded their submission calling for:
Expedient passage of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation Bill 2012—
will provide certainty to industry and investors and allow the CEFC to begin assessing eligible clean energy proposals in a timely manner.
I turn to the submission provided by the Beyond Zero Emissions organisation. In particular, the Beyond Zero Emissions organisation is advocating the take-up of concentrating solar thermal power with storage technology to power our country. Concentrating solar thermal is a commercial technology able to provide reliable power 24 hours a day. However, as it is a less mature technology, it is currently not cost competitive with other fossil and renewable technologies. Given the large capital cost component of the cost of solar thermal energy electricity, Beyond Zero Emissions highlight that the Clean Energy Finance Corporation could help this technology be deployed in Australia. And, excitingly, we could build the infrastructure here in Australia using our existing manufacturing expertise.
As with most renewable energy technologies, the up-front capital cost of concentrating solar thermal power represents over 90 per cent of the levelised cost of energy. Consequently the cost of capital, or the effective interest rate on capital investment, has a substantial influence on the economic viability of a project. Using the government bond rate through finance from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation may be able to deliver investment in concentrating solar thermal power. However, to do this, Beyond Zero Emissions state that the Clean Energy Finance Corporation must be allowed to provide at least 75 per cent of the capital investment for concentrating solar thermal power plants. This represents as much as $500 million to $1 billion. At current commercial rates, the levelised cost of electricity for concentrating solar thermal power is over $250 per megawatt hour. If the Clean Energy Finance Corporation allowed 75 per cent of the capital cost to be financed at the government risk-free rate, with the remaining 25 per cent financed at the commercial rate, the levelised cost of electricity could approach $150 per megawatt hour. This composition of debt to equity is typical finance leverage for power infrastructure projects. And this leaves concentrating solar thermal power about $12 to $25 per megawatt hour more expensive than other renewable energies. To achieve investment in concentrating solar thermal power in Australia, we need the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to significantly consider a larger than traditional investment in concentrating solar thermal power.
I thank Hydro Tasmania, Beyond Zero Emissions and all organisations for their submissions to the Senate inquiry. I urge all senators to support this bill and not be spooked by those opposite and their attitude to this most serious issue.