

- Title
MOTIONS
Health Services Union
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
20-08-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
PRESIDENT, The
- Page
5791
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Stage
Health Services Union
- Type
- Context
MOTIONS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/36885766-09eb-423d-8597-f2b0a8957b25/0090
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Education Funding
(Milne, Sen Christine, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Quarantine
(Moore, Sen Claire, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Carbon Pricing
(Sinodinos, Sen Arthur, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Future Fund: Tobacco Investment
(Di Natale, Sen Richard, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Schools
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Carbon Pricing
(Williams, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Manufacturing
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
Education Funding
(Mason, Sen Brett, Carr, Sen Kim) -
National Broadband Network
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Carbon Pricing
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Fisheries Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2012, Health Insurance Amendment (Extended Medicare Safety Net) Bill 2012
- Maritime Powers Bill 2012, Maritime Powers (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2012
- Tax Laws Amendment (Cross-Border Transfer Pricing) Bill (No. 1) 2012
-
Criminal Code Amendment (Cluster Munitions Prohibition) Bill 2010
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Feeney, Sen David
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Departmental and Agency Offices (Question Nos 1752, 1761, 1768, 1769 and 1780)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Health Services Union (Question No. 1857)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health Services Union (Question No. 1862)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Infrastructure and Transport (Question Nos 1877 and 1878)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1900)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1904)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health Services Union (Question No. 1908)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1917)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1920)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australia Post (Question No. 1926)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australia Post: Coorparoo (Question No. 1927)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Communications and Media Authority (Question No. 1967)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australia Post (Question No. 1970)
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australia Post (Question No. 1979)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Departmental and Agency Offices (Question Nos 1752, 1761, 1768, 1769 and 1780)
Page: 5791
Senator JACINTA COLLINS (Victoria—Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Parliamentary Secretary for School Education and Workplace Relations) (15:45): I seek leave to make a brief statement.
The PRESIDENT: Leave is granted for one minute.
Senator JACINTA COLLINS: The government does not support this motion. The government has been clear that we do not condone the misuse of members' funds by trade unions. We have been clear that we consider the conduct outlined in the Temby report to be unacceptable. On these matters there is no question. That is why we have moved and passed legislation in this parliament to increase the financial accountability and transparency of trade unions and to triple penalties. That is why we applied to the Federal Court to appoint an independent administrator for the HSU. On both matters we got not one iota of support from the opposition.
This government also respects the independence of Australia's tribunals and our courts. We understand that it is not our role to seek to unduly influence investigations or court processes. This simply is not our role. The opposition has been inconsistent on this matter from day one. They accused us of interference, then called on us to intervene and then wanted matters to be dealt with in the courts, but they want to act as judge and jury in the meantime. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. (Time expired)