

- Title
FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
26-11-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
- Page
2411
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Fifield, Sen Mitchell
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-11-26/0186
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- ASSISTING VICTIMS OF OVERSEAS TERRORISM BILL 2010
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- PRIVATE SENATORS' BILLS
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
-
In Committee
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Division
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Division
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Brandis, Sen George
- Brandis, Sen George
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- COMMITTEES
-
NATIONAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING REGULATOR BILL 2010
NATIONAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING REGULATOR (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 2010 - BUSINESS
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- AIRPORTS AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CONFIDENTIALITY OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION) BILL 2010
- RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT (VALIDATION OF CERTAIN PARENTING ORDERS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
- CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (SONS OF GWALIA) BILL 2010
- HEALTH INSURANCE AMENDMENT (PATHOLOGY REQUESTS) BILL 2010
- FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- THERAPEUTIC GOODS AMENDMENT (2010 MEASURES NO. 1) BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
- EXTRADITION (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES) REGULATIONS 2010
- TERRITORIES LAW REFORM BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
- BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- BUSINESS
- VALEDICTORY
- NOTICES
- Adjournment
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 2411
Senator FIFIELD (Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) (2:32 PM)
—I rise to speak on the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill 2010. This is the seventh financial framework legislation amendment bill since 2004. These bills have continued the coalition’s work to promote transparent and accountable government finances for Australian government departments, agencies, Commonwealth authorities and companies, which are predominantly contained in the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 and the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997. This bill in particular seeks to update the framework, improve operational efficiency and assist with the operation of interjurisdictional entities.
Firstly, the bill repeals 20 redundant special appropriations including six acts in their entirety. Secondly, the bill seeks to improve the governance framework established by the FMA Act and the CAC Act—that is an acronym that has always troubled me—both of which govern the management and accountability of Commonwealth agencies, authorities and the executive arm of government. The bill will allow ministers to delegate certain functions under the CAC Act to departmental secretaries, relating to the oversight of Commonwealth authorities and Commonwealth companies. It also seeks to allow relevant state and territory ministers to request information about the FMA Act, agencies and Commonwealth authorities operating under the CAC Act.
Thirdly, the bill consolidates the Australian Institute of Criminology with the Criminology Research Council into a single agency while also transferring them from the CAC Act to the FMA Act. It also seeks to transfer the governance of the Australian Law Reform Commission from the CAC Act to the FMA Act and, further, the National Transport Commission will be brought under the CAC, as it currently sits outside existing frameworks other than for its annual reporting.
The coalition broadly supports these amendments, however I draw the house’s attention to page 5.2 of the Department of Finance and Deregulation red book—the incoming government brief publicly released on 1 October—which stated:
Through this Bill—
the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill 2010—
there is also an opportunity for the Government to reconfirm its support for a strong financial framework dealing with Commonwealth resources by expanding the definition of ‘proper use’ to include ‘economical’. While proper use already includes ‘efficient, effective and ethical’, inclusion of the word ‘economical’ will increase the focus on the level of resources the Commonwealth applies to achieve outcomes.
This was the department’s subtle way of acknowledging this government’s reckless waste and mismanagement across a range of portfolios. Although I am tempted, in light of the hour of the day I will not go exhaustively through every example, which I know will be a source of great relief to those on the other side. This side of the chamber does support the very careful stewardship of taxpayers’ money. It is not what we have seen over the three years of this government. Rather than elucidating that further, I will just indicate that the opposition will not be opposing the bill.