

- Title
FOOD STANDARDS AMENDMENT (TRUTH IN LABELLING—GENETICALLY MODIFIED MATERIAL) BILL 2010
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
16-11-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
- Page
1341
- Party
IND
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-11-16/0085
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CONNECTING PEOPLE WITH JOBS) BILL 2010
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL PREVENTIVE HEALTH AGENCY BILL 2010
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Fifield, Sen Mitchell, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Climate Change
(Moore, Sen Claire, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Water Infrastructure
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Automotive Industry
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Broadband
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Health: Disease Control
(Milne, Sen Christine, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Broadband
(Kroger, Sen Helen, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Broadband
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Antisiphoning List
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
-
COMMITTEES
- Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee
- Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee
- National Capital and External Territories Committee
- Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee
- Corporations and Financial Services Committee
- Environment and Communications References Committee
- PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION REPORT
- LANGUAGE RIGHTS OF TIBETANS
- MENTAL HEALTH
- FOOD STANDARDS AMENDMENT (TRUTH IN LABELLING—GENETICALLY MODIFIED MATERIAL) BILL 2010
- ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS
- BUSINESS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AVIATION CRIMES AND POLICING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL PREVENTIVE HEALTH AGENCY BILL 2010
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1341
Senator XENOPHON (4:05 PM)
—I move:
That this bill be now read a second time.
I table an explanatory memorandum relating to the bill and seek leave to have the second reading speeches incorporated in Hansard.
Leave granted.
Senator XENOPHON
—The incorporated speech read as follows—
The issue of genetically modified food is one that justifiably creates concern in the community.
That said I believe not enough Australians realise that our entire food industry is going through a revolution the likes of which is unprecedented.
And, sadly, not enough Australians seem to realise the implications that the rapid introduction of genetically modified materials may have on our health and potentially on our ability to produce safe foods and foods free from GM contamination.
Right now, Australians are living under one of the weakest food labelling regimes in the world, including when we come to genetically modified foods.
On the surface, our laws seem set up to protect consumers and there is a requirement for all food that contains GM materials to be labelled.
But there are significant exemptions to this requirement that render it useless as a consumer protection.
In September 2010, independent testing by Greenpeace revealed that infant baby formula, S-26 Soy, contained traces of genetically modified (GM) material and that presence of GM had been found in separate trials of the product in varying countries in previous years.
However, because the amount of GM found in the product was less than 1 percent, under the current food labelling standards, manufacturers, producers and distributors are not required to label their products as containing GM.
In fact, if the presence is less than 1 percent and the manufacturer, producer or distributor claims it was ‘unintentional’, they are not in breach of any labelling requirement.
This is despite growing community consensus that consumers have a right to know what they are eating, and many want to know if they are consuming products which have a presence of genetically modified materials.
A 2009 Newspoll survey found that 90 percent of Australian consumers want all food derived from GM crops to be labelled.
Australians want to know what’s in their food and what they’re feeding their families.
This Bill will require the accurate labelling of genetically modified material in food.
Under the Bill, Food Standards Australia New Zealand will be required to introduce a standard for the labelling of genetically modified material, irrespective of the amount or how it came to be present.
It also requires Food Standards Australia New Zealand to establish due diligence guidelines for products which claim to be GM-Free.
This will ensure that products that claim to be GM-Free, whether it’s by way of using it in their labelling or by not having any labelling, will be required to provide evidence of their claim.
I thank Greenpeace for their ongoing campaigning on this issue.
Truth in labelling is vital to enable Australian consumers to have an informed choice about the food they eat and the products they consume.
Otherwise, we are literally shopping in the dark.
Quite simply, Australians have a right to know, and this Bill will ensure that manufacturers, producers and distributors provide them with clear labelling information about genetically modified materials.